Bridge Design Presentation, Mechanics Statics
-
Upload
adibah-hanusi -
Category
Education
-
view
2.221 -
download
8
Transcript of Bridge Design Presentation, Mechanics Statics
By:ALIF HANIFA BIN CHE HASSAN (GL)
ADIBAH BINTI HANUSIAHMAD ZUHAILI BIN ZAINAL BASRI
ALBOGAMY, KHALED NAWAR MARIF AZRAEI BIN SAHABUDIN
CRISTINE HURING ANAK PATRICK KENNEDYDANIA QISYTEENA BINTI SALAHUDDIN
HAFIZAH HANUN BINTI ABU BAKAR
MEMB123 MECHANICS STATICS SLIDES PRESENTATION
Bridge Design Project
CRITERIAIn this project, we designed, built, and tested a model bridge with the measurements as
stated below:
69cm
49.2cm
Actual measurements for our design
PROTOTYPE DESIGN AND TESTING
DIMENSIONS
We’ve been told that the bridge should not be longer than 70cm. The width of the bridge should be at least 5cm but not more than 10cm. The height of the bridge should not be exceeds 20cm above or 5 cm below “ground level”. The bridge also must span a distance of 50 cm. So, we had to think of how we’re going to use the sticks and getting some useful information about them.•1 stick = 150mm•After calculating, we knew that we will need about 187 sticks for the base while total length of the bridge= 69cm
ANALYSIS/ SYNTHESIS/ CONCEPTUALIZATION
We were making 2 tests to perform the bridge component strength.
Test 1 - Tension Test Objective The objective of the tension test is to determine a recommended overlap distance for two tongue depressors in tension (taking into account strength and total span length). Procedure 1. The test specimens were built by gluing two tongue depressors together using different lengths of overlap ( max. < 3/4"). We made sure to test at least 3 specimens for a given overlap distance to ensure more accurate results. The hole was reinforced with extra pieces of tongue depressor. 2. The sticks were placed in the vice on the testing platform and the hole was reinforced at the other end with tape.
Test 2 - Compression Test Objective The objective for Test 2 is to determine a maximum length that designers should not exceed, to ensure adequate strength from compressions members. Procedure 1. A ruler is used to prepare several specimens for the compression test ranging in length from 3” to about 10”. For members greater than 6”, two tongue depressors were glued together with a 1” overlap length and then the ends was cutting to the desired length. At least 2 samples for each length are prepared to ensure some level of accuracy. 2. To test the specimens, we were placed them upright on the scale and pushed down as shown in Figure 2 (using pliers may be easier on our hands).
ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS CONCEPTUALIZATION
BRAINSTORMING IDEAS
To make the start of the project easier, some questions were asked!!
MATERIALS
•Tongue depressor sticks•A metal hook to carry the load at the center of the structure•Glue gun and glue sticks•String/ masking tape
CONSTRUCTION METHOD
1. Firstly, we decided on the design and laid it out on paper.2. Then, the sticks were measured and marked so they could be drilled for
the pin joints. 3. Next, we constructed the floor for the length of the bridge, or the struts
we will apply the sides to.4. After that, we measured the length of the floor or struts. It is likely the
bridge has to span a specified length.5. Finally, we attached each poles with ropes to the struts.6. Then, we constructed a number of identical poles by tied them with tiny
rope we are going to join to the struts or floor.
TESTING PROCEDURE
The bridge has been tested to failure using the testing apparatus in the picture since it must hold a minimum weight of 5 kg or 50 N.
Efficiency ratio = test load/weight of model = 5 KG / 7.65 KG= 6.536
DESIGN OF THE BRIDGE
CONCLUSION
At the end, we have accomplished the required task. We had a lot of fun, challenge, tire , and memorable experience that we have gained. The bridge task teaches us the values of determination, perseverance, creativity, logic thinking, time management, cost effectiveness, initiatives, and all this values can lead us towards success when we are working in group. Although we were facing a lot of difficulties in decision making and getting ideas but our cooperated team members were very patient and managed to solve the problems that we had during the construction. We started our project early so that we have time to modify and troubleshoot the problems. Flexibility, creativity and perseverance are our motto.
ATTACHMENTS
THANK YOU