Brian Edwards Praesentation 2011

download Brian Edwards Praesentation 2011

of 25

description

Brian Edwards Praesentation 2011

Transcript of Brian Edwards Praesentation 2011

  • Green Buildings Pay: design, productivity and ecology

    Prof Brian W Edwards

    Author of books : z Green Buildings Payz Rough Guide to

    Sustainabilityz Sustainable Architecturez Green Architecture

    RIBA sustainability advisor 2000-2

  • Questions addressed in research: Main Question :How do green buildings pay?

    What measures of benefit should we use What is the mix of Social, Economic and

    Environmental benefits What is the relationship between energy

    use, wellbeing, health, ecology and staff productivity

    Do green buildings produce image benefits for the company

    What impact does environmnetal certification have upon design and client expectation

  • Research method

    12 primary cases (6 in USA, 3 in Denmark, 3 in UK)

    6 secondary cases (4 in USA, 2 in UK) Criteria for cases (POE, high BREEAM, LEED

    score, architectural quality, client feedback) Technical (energy use) and social/user surveys,

    interviews (clients, designers etc) Comparison of building types and within types

  • The main cases

    Denmark Ramboll HQ, VKR Holding HQ, Green Lighthouse

    UK- BDP offices, Wessex Water HQ, Woodlands Trust

    USA- Hearst Tower, Bank of America Tower, New York Times HQ, San Francisco Federal Building, Genzyme HQ, US Census Bureau

    Canada- Manitoba Hydro HQ

  • Examples 1 (Denmark)

  • Ramboll Head office High energy performce 79 kWh

    (equivalent to BREEAM Excellent) (83kWh in use)

    High level of staff satisfaction (8.5 out of 10)

    Key satisfaction points were daylight quality, comfort and controls (80+%)

    Lack of satisfaction were cold drafts, top floor and noise (20%)

    Other key points noted- good communication, inspiring, motivating, democratic

    Atrium, views and public transport highly valued

  • Examples 2 (UK)

  • Examples 3 USA

  • Context and Issues Growth in environmental

    assessment and certification schemes

    BREEAM (1990), LEED (1998), DGNB (2008)

    Client drivers for accreditation (image, life cycle costing, market advantage)

    Global standards or national standards (conflicts across frontiers)

    Added value of green certification- real or perceived

  • Key Findings: Impact of BREEAM, LEED etc

    On clients (business benefits, recruitment, productivity, image)

    On architects and engineers (new design approaches, new digital tools, integration of design and technology)

    On users (perception of health and well- being, commitment, retention, quality of life at work)

  • Key Findings (clients)

    Different client types have different motives and objectives

    Corporate HQ is main arena Private clients leading public clients Different business models in USA

    compared to Europe and China Green clients are green across a broad

    front (not just building)

  • Key findings (Architects) BREEAM, LEED etc has led to much innovation

    in design Innovation is most marked in facade

    engineering, atria design and roofs Practices now use a wide range of

    environmental simulation tools Architects are expected to be green Renewable energy is big design driver in

    emerging economies Move from passive to active systems

  • Key findings (users) High level of satisfaction with certified buildings

    (8.7 out of 10) Users like natural design Users like views and green space Users acknowledge productivity benefits Users like social benefits of atria Users like simple controls and screen

    knowledge Users think design affects communication and

    ideas generation

  • Typical examples of working space

  • Problems

    Clients- buildings do not perform as well as intended. Energy use often 3 times predicted consumption

    Designers- risks and complexity of green design. Certification is driving design solutions

    Users- noise is problem in open plan; ground floors and top floors are less attractive; lack of control

  • Future Trends 1 New workspace types require new sustainable

    solutions (Google model) Environmental assessment is moving towards

    sustainability assessment Certification matters more than assessment Growth in environmental assessment software Energy is driving built form (especially

    renewable energy) Skill and accreditation migration into architects

    offices Growth in green research in practice

  • Future Trends 2 China is catching up LEED has led to global awareness of business

    benefits of sustainability. Growth in green marketing via LEED, BREEAM Regional patterns of green design are emerging

    in spite of global accreditation Consumers (users) are a big driver for green

    buildings especially in knowledge industries (media, banking, research)

    Knowledge flows from new build to refurbishment (in recession)

  • Future Trends 3

    Accreditation can erode national characteristics Cultural differences exist between Europe, USA

    and Asia In Europe there are big differences Green buildings reflect cultural values as well as

    environmental priorities Denmark has strong social democratic tradition

    in architecture. Will it survive the techno-focus of DGNB

  • Future Issues

    Should building environmental certification be for life

    Should LEED, BREEAM, DGNB etc be incorporated into national legislation

    Should there be EU standards for certification Can design variety exist in highly regulated and

    certified green world Are the design professions moving fast enough Are our assumptions correct

  • LEED Images

  • BREEAM Images

  • Danish Green (but not DGNB) Offices

  • Conclusions 1- Does Green Building Pay?

    Yes but... Green offices produce tangible business benefits. These

    benefits are improved with certification The benefits are found mainly in increased business

    performance and productivity Green offices have marketing and image appeal Energy savings are relatively small but good energy

    design leads to factors enjoyed by users Life cycle model has to consider social, economic and

    environmental factors, not just energy performance

  • Conclusions 2: Life Cycle models

    Business benefits of enhanced productivity (2%- 5%) outweigh energy cost benefits of green design by a factor of about 4 to 1

    Image (of building) and marketing (of company) through sustainable design brings secondary benefits (to company and community)

    Energy is not the only impact (ecology and other environmental resources matter too)

    Life cycle models must include users POE should be conditional on certification to

    confirm LCA

  • New green model Research suggests the following model. Green Buildings Pay when:

    En+Ec+Ev=