Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd 

 BRAD GOODE & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD 

Consulting Anthropologists & Archaeologists 79 Naturaliste Terrace, Dunsborough WA 6281 

0432 267 443  bradnlee@westnet.com.au www.bradgoode.com.au 

ABN: 41 134 732 040 

 

2nd November 2015   Mr Wayne Prangnell and Mr Mike Hulme Hulme Developments Pty Ltd Sustainable Human Settlement Design & Development 10412 Bussell Highway WITCHCLIFEE WA 6283   Dear Wayne and Mike,  The results of the heritage consultation process regarding the proposed Witchcliffe Ecovillage project from Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd (BGA) is documented below.   Hulme Developments Pty Ltd (Hulme Developments) are proposing to develop existing Lots 2807 and 2812 along the eastern portion Bussell Highway in the town of Witchcliffe, Western Australia.   Specifically  Hulme  Developments  are  proposing  to  develop  a  300  residential  lot  ecovillage with adjoining commercial and community facilities, recreation, agriculture and drainage reserves over 150 hectares  of  existing  cleared  land.  The  Witchcliffe  Ecovillage  has  been  designed  to  be  a  highly sustainable and self‐reliant community through its planned integration and utilisation into the existing environment. This will be done through a high level of self‐sufficiency in energy, including; the use of on‐site power generation, solar passive housing design and  lot orientation; 100% self‐sufficiency  in on‐site water capture and use including rainwater harvesting from roof catchments, treatment and re‐use of greywater and blackwater and use of other water supplies; and the production of food and agricultural products  including the provision of  infrastructure to enable community gardens for the growing of fresh food produce.  Prior  to proceeding Hulme Developments wishes  to determine  if  there  are  any  sites or places of Aboriginal heritage significance as defined by section 5 of the Western Australian Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (AHA) that will be affected by the proposed works, thereby fulfilling their obligations under the AHA.   In relation to the Aboriginal heritage consultation a search of the Department of Aboriginal Affairs (DAA) Aboriginal Sites register was conducted on the 19th of October 2015  in order to determine  if there are any previously recorded Aboriginal heritage sites or places that would be affected by the proposed  project.  The  search  revealed  that  there  are  no  previously  recorded  ethnographic  or 

   

2 Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd 

archaeological Aboriginal heritage sites or places located within the proposed Witchcliffe Ecovillage development.   Anthropological and historical research in the South West of Western Australia has revealed that all water sources contain great significance for the Nyungar people, not only as a life‐sustaining resource but  as  a  fundamental  embodiment  of Dreaming  and mythologies  (Radcliffe‐Brown  1926:  19‐22). Water has been widely described throughout Aboriginal culture as the living element that both creates and defines the shape and character of the country, as well as inscribing it with sacredness and identity (Berndt & Berndt 1999: 110‐113). The importance of such mythologies and spiritual beliefs result in particularly  respectful practices concerning waterways, as well as dictating cultural affiliations and relationships with  country. As well as  containing  special  importance and  significance due  to  their spiritual associations, waterways act as  focal points  for  resource activities and  ritual aggregations (Hallam 1979: 67‐68). In the South West the Dreaming serpent spirit of the water is referred to as the Waugal, a multi‐faceted ancestral deity who created the rivers, hills and valleys, and whose spirit still resides in places where it camped, slept and lived (see Bates 1966; Bates 1985; and Radcliffe‐Brown 1926). As such these places are considered to be sacred by Nyungars.   In the vicinity of the Witchcliffe Ecovillage lie a number of brooks. In particular, located approximately 775 metres from the location of the proposed ecovillage, is DAA Heritage Place ID 24131 ‘Boodjidup Brook’.  Boodjidup  Brook  was  reported  to  the  DAA  in  2007  as  a  water  course  of  mythological significance.  The  Brook was  defined  to  have  significance  due  to  its  spiritual  association with  the Waugal; as a source of red and white ochre used for ceremonial purposes; as a source for plant species traditionally used for creating spears, rope and for medicinal purposes; and as a habitat for echidnas and kangaroos (AIC 2007: 36). The name ‘Boodjidup’ was reported to mean ‘small river going through’, with ‘Boodj’ the Nyungar word for ‘small’ (ibid).  The  same  mythological,  historical  and  socio‐economic  Nyungar  cultural  values  surrounding  the Boodjidup Brook are most  likely to be attached to the adjacent brooks  in the Witchcliffe Ecovillage project area.   The Witchcliffe Ecovillage environment has been highly disturbed due to historically being utilised as a beef cattle farm and an organic vineyard. Subsequently, no additional habitat clearing is required for the development of the ecovillage. Due to no previous Aboriginal sites or places being recorded within the proposed Witchcliffe Ecovillage area, as well as the developable area existing as a significantly altered environment,  it was determined by BGA  that  there  is a  low risk of archaeological material existing  in  the  project  area.  Therefore,  a  documented  consultation with  local Nyungar  people  to ascertain the importance and significance of the proposed development area was recommended in order to comply with the AHA.   As such the following representatives of the South West Boojarah WC2006/004 and the Harris Family WC1996/041 Native Title Claim groups were present at the consultation:  

Ms Ellen Hill 

Ms Dorothy Blurton 

Mr Jack Hill 

Ms Gloria Hill 

Mr Wayne Webb 

Mr Vernon Webb 

Mr Keith Harris  

 On  the  21st  of  October  2015  BGA  consultants  Mr  Brad  Goode  and  Ms  Louise  Huxtable (Anthropologists) met the aforementioned members of the South West Boojarah WC06/04 and the Harris  Family WC96/41  Native  Title  Claim  groups  at  the  Hulme  Developments  headquarters  in 

   

3 Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd 

Witchcliffe. Mr Mike Hulme, Ms Michelle Hulme and Mr Wayne Prangnell were also in attendance to provide information in regards to the proposed Witchcliffe Ecovillage.   Mr Goode briefed the group to the project details with the aid of aerial photographic maps showing the location of the proposed ecovillage. Mr Goode advised that there are no previously recorded DAA Aboriginal  heritage  sites  or  places  located  within  the  survey  area  and  that  BGA  had  previously undertaken  a  heritage  survey  on  the  neighbouring  land  on Davis  Road with  no  ethnographic  or archaeological sites uncovered.   Mr Hulme then paid his respects to the Traditional Owners, acknowledging Wardandi country and the sustainable traditional way of living conducted by Aboriginal people in Australia.   Mr Hulme then explained the Witchcliffe Ecovillage plan to the group, advising that the aim of the project is to produce sustainable residential housing and living that is designed in a manner to enable residents to be self‐sufficient in water; energy neutral; and achieve a high level of self‐sufficiency in fresh  food produce. Mr Hulme advised that Hulme Developments have purchased 150 hectares of cleared land adjacent to the town centre of Witchcliffe. The ecovillage is designed to be self‐sufficient whilst using  renewable clean energy harnessed  from  the sun and wind and generated on site. Mr Hulme further advised that rain and storm water will be collected in catchments which will be used for households and for the production of food. On‐site rainwater harvesting, through rooftops and dams, will enable the ecovillage to be 100% self‐sufficient in regards to water requirements. A waste water treatment plant will recycle all grey and black water to drinking water standard for re‐use within the ecovillage, whilst dams will supply water for recreation and irrigation.   Here the Traditional Owners enquired into the effect the water system would have on the land. Mr Hulme  responded  that  studies  carried  out  on  the  potential  effects  from water  run‐off  from  the ecovillage yielded positive results as currently the water runs through the paddocks quickly due to the lack of vegetation. Through  revegetation planting and  infrastructure, water  run‐off will be  slowed down through the catchment and will subsequently be absorbed into the land on porous ground.  Mr Hulme reported that the residential homes will be built utilising natural materials, such as straw‐bales, rammed earth, timber and stone. The residential homes will be divided into 14 clusters which will  each  be  responsible  for  maintaining  a  community  garden  and  producing  fresh  food  for consumption. Each cluster will also have a community shed and chook pens. Cycle paths will be placed throughout the ecovillage, encouraging pedestrians to cycle and walk to work, whilst small roads will service the back of the houses for vehicle and parking access.  Mr Hulme advised that there will be shared community strata management guidelines and codes of conduct for the residents to follow, aimed at avoiding potential conflict and built upon the premise of community living. Each of the 14 clusters will have an internal organisation for the strata group with 3 or 4 nominated residents representing the cluster. If the residents wish to alter an aspect of their cluster then all 14 resident lots will be required to vote in regards to the proposed change. Here Mr Hulme suggested that the Traditional Owners could provide advice in regards to traditional ways of cultural intergroup living and conflict management.  The Traditional Owners then enquired into the use of native plant species in revegetation and planting in  the  ecovillage. Mr  Hulme  responded  that  the  urban  and  residential  portion  of  the  ecovillage expands approximately 60 hectares. The remaining hectares of the ecovillage will be used for organic agricultural food production and utilities, such as orchids and dairy farming. The current ecovillage design plan does not account for producing grain, however this may be an option in the future.  With the exception of vegetable, fruit and herb plants, including the community gardens, the only planting 

   

4 Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd 

and  revegetation will  be with  Indigenous  plant  species.  The  existing  riparian  and  remnant  bush habitats will be protected and encouraged.   The consultants then enquired into any possible places of Aboriginal significance within the proposed development area, including any sacred, ritual, ceremonial or historical sites that may be present. The Nyungar informants responded that they are not aware of any heritage sites within the survey area. The Traditional Owners did, however, provide advice on the importance of water sources, stating that there are a number of brooks in the area which have associations with the Waugal Dreaming figure. As such the Nyungar representatives requested that water sources in the area, including the existing and proposed dams which connect to the brooks, be treated with respect,  including ensuring  that untreated water is not discharged into the brooks.  The Traditional Owners  then enquired  into  their potential participation  in  the ecovillage after  this initial consultation. Mr Hulme responded that the traditional Aboriginal way of living in Australia was the most sustainable way. He advised that whilst no contemporary ways of living can be as sustainable as traditional Aboriginal culture, the ecovillage aims to replicate a modern version. As such Mr Hulme stated that he would be pleased if the Traditional Owners would provide advice regarding sustainable living  for  the  ecovillage. He  suggested  that  this  advice  could  be  implemented  into  interpretative signage, educational lessons and consultation in regards to Indigenous ways of living sustainably and Nyungar uses of Indigenous plant and animal species, and through providing advice on the cultural management of  intergroup  living and conflict resolution. Mr Hulme also suggested that there  is an opportunity to develop an Indigenous perspective in regards to tourism, such as the construction of mia‐mia  or  traditional  huts,  in  the  education  centre  or  in  the  community  gardens.  Mr  Hulme additionally  advised  that  there would  likely  be  Indigenous  employment  opportunities  during  the ecovillage development.   As  such  it  was  collectively  agreed  by  the  Nyungar  elders  that Mr Wayne Webb  represent  the Traditional Owners and be the point of contact in regards to the Witchcliffe Ecovillage.   Mr Hulme also offered to provide advice to the Traditional Owners in regards to the transfer of land under the Noongar Land Estate agreement of the Noongar Standard Heritage Agreement (NSHA). Mr Hill  responded  that  that  the Traditional Owners would be happy  to accept  the assistance  that Mr Hulme offered.  Mr Goode then concluded the consultation by enquiring as to whether the Traditional Owners had any  other  concerns  they  wished  to  express  in  relation  to  the  Witchcliffe  Ecovillage  proposed development. The Nyungar  informants  responded  that  they did not and  that  they were happy  for Hulme Developments to proceed with the ecovillage project.  As a result of the above consultation with several nominated members of the South West Boojarah WC2006/004 and the Harris Family WC1996/041 Native Title Claim groups  it has been determined that there are no ethnographic sites of significance as defined by section 5b, 5c, 39.2 and 39.3 of the AHA located within the proposed Witchcliffe Ecovillage development.   As a result of the consultation the following recommendations are made:  It  is  recommended  that Hulme Developments Pty Ltd proceeds with  their plans  to undertake  the construction of an ecovillage in existing Lots 2807 and 2812 along the eastern portion Bussell Highway in the town of Witchcliffe without risk of breaching section 17 of the AHA in relation to ethnographic Aboriginal heritage sites, as defined by section 5 of the AHA.   

   

5 Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd 

It is recommended that Hulme Developments Pty Ltd provide Indigenous employment opportunities, consultation,  interpretative signage and native  revegetation  in  the development of  the Witchcliffe Ecovillage.   In regards to the brooks in the area it is also recommended that the proponent should make every effort not to conduct activities that will pollute or affect the riparian zones of the brooks, as all water sources are defined as significant to Nyungar peoples’ spiritual beliefs and as places customarily used to hunt and source food, water and medicine.   If you require any further information or clarification please do not hesitate to contact the office.  I thank you for allowing myself and my colleges to be involved in such a project.  Kind regards 

 Louise Huxtable Consulting Anthropologist     

   

6 Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd 

  Reference List   Australian Interaction Consultants, 2007, ‘Site Identification Heritage Survey Report of Location: 2183, 

Bussell Highway, and Lot 2, Redgate Road, Witchcliffe, Western Australia’, report prepared for RPS Bowman Bishaw Gorham, February 2007 

 Bates, D. 1966, The Passing of the Aborigines, John Murray: London  Bates, D. 1985, The Native Tribes of Western Australia,  I. White  (Ed.) National Library of Australia: 

Canberra  Berndt, R.M. and Berndt, C.H. 1999, The World of the First Australians, Aboriginal Traditional Life: Past 

and Present, Aboriginal Studies Press: Canberra  Goode, B. and Harris,  J. 2008,  ‘Aboriginal Heritage  Survey of  Lot 1032 Redgate Road, Witchcliffe, 

Western Australia’, report prepared for Koltasz Smith on behalf of Redgate Development Pty Ltd, March 2008. 

 Goode, B.  and Harris,  J.  2008,  ‘An Aboriginal Heritage  Survey  of  Lot  1 Redgate Road Witchcliffe; 

Western Australia’, report prepared for the WPG Witchcliffe Ltd, December 2008.  Hallam, S.J. 1979, Fire and Hearth, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies: Canberra  Radcliffe‐Brown, A.R.  1926,  ‘The  Rainbow  Serpent Myth  of Australia’  in  The  Journal  of  the Royal 

Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 56  Western Australia Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972      

   

7 Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd 

Photographs from 21st October 201 

Search Criteria

No Registered Aboriginal Sites in Shapefile - Hulme_Development_Survey_Area

The Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 preserves all Aboriginal sites in Western Australia whether or not they are registered. Aboriginal sites exist that are not recorded on the Register of Aboriginal Sites, and some registered sites may no longer exist.

The information provided is made available in good faith and is predominately based on the information provided to the Department of Aboriginal Affairs by third parties.  The information is provided solely on the basis that readers will be responsible for making their own assessment as to the accuracy of the information.  If you find any errors or omissions in our records, including our maps, it would be appreciated if you email the details to the Department at heritageenquiries@daa.wa.gov.au and we will make every effort to rectify it as soon as possible.

Disclaimer

Your heritage enquiry is on land within the following Indigenous Land Use Agreement(s): South West Boojarah #2 People ILUA

On 8 June 2015, six identical Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUAs) were executed across the South West by the Western Australian Government and, respectively, the Yued, Whadjuk People, Gnaala Karla Booja, Ballardong People, South West Boojarah #2 and Wagyl Kaip & Southern Noongar groups, and the South West Land and Sea Council (SWALSC).   The ILUAs bind the parties (including 'the State', which encompasses all State Government Departments and certain State Government agencies) to enter into a Noongar Standard Heritage Agreement (NSHA) when conducting Aboriginal Heritage Surveys in the ILUA areas, unless they have an existing heritage agreement.  It is also intended that other State agencies and instrumentalities enter into the NSHA when conducting Aboriginal Heritage Surveys in the ILUA areas.  It is recommended a NSHA is entered into, and an 'Activity Notice' issued under the NSHA, if there is a risk that an activity will ‘impact’ (i.e. by excavating, damaging, destroying or altering in any way) an Aboriginal heritage site. The Aboriginal Heritage Due Diligence Guidelines, which are referenced by the NSHA,  provide guidance on how to assess the potential risk to Aboriginal heritage.   Likewise, from 8 June 2015 the Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP) in granting Mineral, Petroleum and related Access Authority tenures within the South West Settlement ILUA areas, will place a condition on these tenures requiring a heritage agreement or a NSHA before any rights can be exercised.   If you are a State Government Department, Agency or Instrumentality, or have a heritage condition placed on your mineral or petroleum title by DMP, you should seek advice as to the requirement to use the NSHA for your proposed activity.  The full ILUA documents, maps of the ILUA areas and the NSHA template can be found at https://www.dpc.wa.gov.au/lantu/Claims/Pages/SouthWestSettlement.aspx.  Further advice can also be sought from the Department of Aboriginal Affairs (DAA) at heritageenquiries@daa.wa.gov.au.

South West Settlement ILUA Disclaimer

© Government of Western Australia Report created: 19/10/2015 14:04:40 by: Public User Identifier: 198799 Page: 1

Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System

Aboriginal Sites Database

CopyrightCopyright in the information contained herein is and shall remain the property of the State of Western Australia. All rights reserved.

Coordinate AccuracyAccuracy is shown as a code in brackets following the coordinates. Map coordinates (Latitude/Longitude and Easting/Northing) are based on the GDA 94 Datum.The Easting/Northing map grid can be across one or more zones. The zone is indicated for each Easting on the map, i.e. '500000mE:Z50' means Easting=500000, Zone=50.

Terminology (NB that some terminology has varied over the life of the legislation)Place ID/Site ID: This a unique ID assigned by the Department of Aboriginal Affairs to the placeStatus:

o   Registered Site: The place has been assessed as meeting Section 5 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972o   Other Heritage Place which includes:

-  Stored Data / Not a Site: The place has been assessed as not meeting Section 5 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972-  Lodged: Information has been received in relation to the place, but an assessment has not been completed at this stage to determine if it meets

Section 5 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972Access and Restrictions:

o    File Restricted = No: Availability of information (other than boundary) that the Department of Aboriginal Affairs holds in relation to the place is not restricted in any way.

o    File Restricted = Yes: Some of the information that the Department of Aboriginal Affairs holds in relation to the place is restricted if it is considered culturally sensitive. This information will only be made available if the Department of Aboriginal Affairs receives written approval from the informants who provided the information. Download the Request to Access Restricted Information letter and form.

o    Boundary Restricted = No: place location is shown as accurately as the information lodged with the Registrar allows. o    Boundary Restricted = Yes: To preserve confidentiality the exact location and extent of the place is not displayed on the map. However, the shaded region

(generally with an area of at least 4km²) provides a general indication of where the place is located. If you are a landowner and wish to find out more about the exact location of the place, please contact DAA.

o    Restrictions: - No Restrictions: Anyone can view the information.-  Male Access Only: Only males can view restricted information.-  Female Access Only: Only females can view restricted information

Legacy ID: This is the former unique number that the former Department of Aboriginal Sites assigned to the place. This has been replaced by the Place ID / Site ID.

© Government of Western Australia Report created: 19/10/2015 14:04:40 by: Public User Identifier: 198799 Page: 2

Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System

Aboriginal Sites Database

No Results

List of Registered Aboriginal Sites with Map

© Government of Western Australia Report created: 19/10/2015 14:04:40 by: Public User Identifier: 198799 Page: 3

Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System

Aboriginal Sites Database

Copyright for topographic base map information shall at all times remain the property of the Commonwealth of Australia, Geoscience Australia - National Mapping Division. All rights reserved.

Aerial Photos, Cadastre, Local Government Authority, Native Title boundary, Roads data copyright © Western Australian Land Information Authority trading as Landgate (2015).

Geothermal Application, Geothermal Title, Mining Tenement, Petroleum Application, Petroleum Title boundary data copyright © the State of Western Australia (DMP) (2015.10)

For further important information on using this information please see the Department of Aboriginal Affairs' Terms of Use statement at http://www.daa.wa.gov.au/Terms-Of-Use/

Legend

Selected Heritage Sites

Registered Sites

Aboriginal Community Occupied

Aboriginal Community Unoccupied

Town

Search Area

© Government of Western Australia Report created: 19/10/2015 14:04:40 by: Public User Identifier: 198799 Page: 4

Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System

Aboriginal Sites Database

Search Criteria

No Other Heritage Places in Shapefile - Hulme_Development_Survey_Area (2)

The Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 preserves all Aboriginal sites in Western Australia whether or not they are registered. Aboriginal sites exist that are not recorded on the Register of Aboriginal Sites, and some registered sites may no longer exist.

The information provided is made available in good faith and is predominately based on the information provided to the Department of Aboriginal Affairs by third parties.  The information is provided solely on the basis that readers will be responsible for making their own assessment as to the accuracy of the information.  If you find any errors or omissions in our records, including our maps, it would be appreciated if you email the details to the Department at heritageenquiries@daa.wa.gov.au and we will make every effort to rectify it as soon as possible.

Disclaimer

Your heritage enquiry is on land within the following Indigenous Land Use Agreement(s): South West Boojarah #2 People ILUA

On 8 June 2015, six identical Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUAs) were executed across the South West by the Western Australian Government and, respectively, the Yued, Whadjuk People, Gnaala Karla Booja, Ballardong People, South West Boojarah #2 and Wagyl Kaip & Southern Noongar groups, and the South West Land and Sea Council (SWALSC).   The ILUAs bind the parties (including 'the State', which encompasses all State Government Departments and certain State Government agencies) to enter into a Noongar Standard Heritage Agreement (NSHA) when conducting Aboriginal Heritage Surveys in the ILUA areas, unless they have an existing heritage agreement.  It is also intended that other State agencies and instrumentalities enter into the NSHA when conducting Aboriginal Heritage Surveys in the ILUA areas.  It is recommended a NSHA is entered into, and an 'Activity Notice' issued under the NSHA, if there is a risk that an activity will ‘impact’ (i.e. by excavating, damaging, destroying or altering in any way) an Aboriginal heritage site. The Aboriginal Heritage Due Diligence Guidelines, which are referenced by the NSHA,  provide guidance on how to assess the potential risk to Aboriginal heritage.   Likewise, from 8 June 2015 the Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP) in granting Mineral, Petroleum and related Access Authority tenures within the South West Settlement ILUA areas, will place a condition on these tenures requiring a heritage agreement or a NSHA before any rights can be exercised.   If you are a State Government Department, Agency or Instrumentality, or have a heritage condition placed on your mineral or petroleum title by DMP, you should seek advice as to the requirement to use the NSHA for your proposed activity.  The full ILUA documents, maps of the ILUA areas and the NSHA template can be found at https://www.dpc.wa.gov.au/lantu/Claims/Pages/SouthWestSettlement.aspx.  Further advice can also be sought from the Department of Aboriginal Affairs (DAA) at heritageenquiries@daa.wa.gov.au.

South West Settlement ILUA Disclaimer

© Government of Western Australia Report created: 19/10/2015 14:05:29 by: Public User Identifier: 198801 Page: 1

Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System

Aboriginal Sites Database

CopyrightCopyright in the information contained herein is and shall remain the property of the State of Western Australia. All rights reserved.

Coordinate AccuracyAccuracy is shown as a code in brackets following the coordinates. Map coordinates (Latitude/Longitude and Easting/Northing) are based on the GDA 94 Datum.The Easting/Northing map grid can be across one or more zones. The zone is indicated for each Easting on the map, i.e. '500000mE:Z50' means Easting=500000, Zone=50.

Terminology (NB that some terminology has varied over the life of the legislation)Place ID/Site ID: This a unique ID assigned by the Department of Aboriginal Affairs to the placeStatus:

o   Registered Site: The place has been assessed as meeting Section 5 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972o   Other Heritage Place which includes:

-  Stored Data / Not a Site: The place has been assessed as not meeting Section 5 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972-  Lodged: Information has been received in relation to the place, but an assessment has not been completed at this stage to determine if it meets

Section 5 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972Access and Restrictions:

o    File Restricted = No: Availability of information (other than boundary) that the Department of Aboriginal Affairs holds in relation to the place is not restricted in any way.

o    File Restricted = Yes: Some of the information that the Department of Aboriginal Affairs holds in relation to the place is restricted if it is considered culturally sensitive. This information will only be made available if the Department of Aboriginal Affairs receives written approval from the informants who provided the information. Download the Request to Access Restricted Information letter and form.

o    Boundary Restricted = No: place location is shown as accurately as the information lodged with the Registrar allows. o    Boundary Restricted = Yes: To preserve confidentiality the exact location and extent of the place is not displayed on the map. However, the shaded region

(generally with an area of at least 4km²) provides a general indication of where the place is located. If you are a landowner and wish to find out more about the exact location of the place, please contact DAA.

o    Restrictions: - No Restrictions: Anyone can view the information.-  Male Access Only: Only males can view restricted information.-  Female Access Only: Only females can view restricted information

Legacy ID: This is the former unique number that the former Department of Aboriginal Sites assigned to the place. This has been replaced by the Place ID / Site ID.

© Government of Western Australia Report created: 19/10/2015 14:05:29 by: Public User Identifier: 198801 Page: 2

Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System

Aboriginal Sites Database

No Results

List of Other Heritage Places with Map

© Government of Western Australia Report created: 19/10/2015 14:05:29 by: Public User Identifier: 198801 Page: 3

Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System

Aboriginal Sites Database

Copyright for topographic base map information shall at all times remain the property of the Commonwealth of Australia, Geoscience Australia - National Mapping Division. All rights reserved.

Aerial Photos, Cadastre, Local Government Authority, Native Title boundary, Roads data copyright © Western Australian Land Information Authority trading as Landgate (2015).

Geothermal Application, Geothermal Title, Mining Tenement, Petroleum Application, Petroleum Title boundary data copyright © the State of Western Australia (DMP) (2015.10)

For further important information on using this information please see the Department of Aboriginal Affairs' Terms of Use statement at http://www.daa.wa.gov.au/Terms-Of-Use/

Legend

Selected Heritage Places

Other Heritage Places

Aboriginal Community Occupied

Aboriginal Community Unoccupied

Town

Search Area

© Government of Western Australia Report created: 19/10/2015 14:05:29 by: Public User Identifier: 198801 Page: 4

Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System

Aboriginal Sites Database