Boy Scout of the Phils. vs. COA
-
Upload
sophia-amor -
Category
Documents
-
view
25 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Boy Scout of the Phils. vs. COA
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fon 1/24
G.R.No.177131:BOYSCOUTSOFTHEPHILIPPINES,petitioner,v.COMMISSIONONAUDIT,respondent.
Promulgated:
June7,2011
xx
DISSENTINGOPINION
CARPIO,J.:
Idissent.
TheBoyScoutsofthePhilippines(BSP)isneitheragovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationnoragovernmentinstrumentalitysubjecttotheCommissiononAudits(COA)jurisdiction.TheBSPisaprivate,nonstock,andnonprofitcorporationbeyondtheCOAsauditjurisdiction.
I.
COAsAuditJurisdiction
Section2(1),ArticleIXDoftheConstitutionprovidesforCOAsauditjurisdiction,asfollows:
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fon 2/24
SECTION2.(1)TheCommissiononAuditshallhavethepower,authorityanddutytoexamine,audit,andsettleallaccountspertainingtotherevenueandreceiptsof,andexpendituresorusesoffundsandproperty,ownedorheldintrustby,orpertainingto,theGovernment,oranyofitssubdivisions,agencies,orinstrumentalities,includinggovernmentownedandcontrolledcorporationswithoriginalcharters,andonapostauditbasis:(a)constitutionalbodies,commissionsandofficesthathavebeengrantedfiscalautonomyunderthisConstitution(b)autonomousstatecollegesanduniversities(c)othergovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationsandtheirsubsidiariesand(d)suchnongovernmentalentitiesreceivingsubsidyorequity,directlyorindirectly,fromorthroughthegovernment,whicharerequiredbylaworthegrantinginstitutiontosubmittosuchauditasaconditionofsubsidyorequity.However,wheretheinternalcontrolsystemoftheauditedagenciesisinadequate,theCommissionmayadoptsuchmeasures,includingtemporaryorspecialpreaudit,asarenecessaryandappropriatetocorrectthedeficiencies.ItshallkeepthegeneralaccountsoftheGovernmentand,forsuchperiodasmaybeprovidedbylaw,preservethevouchersandothersupportingpaperspertainingthereto.
BasedonthisConstitutionalprovision,theCOAexercisesjurisdictiononapreauditbasisoverthe(1)Government,(2)anyofitssubdivisions,(3)agencies,(4)instrumentalities,and(5)GOCCswithoriginalcharters.
TheCOAalsohasjurisdictiononapostauditbasisover(1)constitutionalbodies,commissionsandofficesthathavebeengrantedfiscalautonomyundertheConstitution(2)autonomousstatecollegesanduniversities(3)otherGOCCs1andtheirsubsidiariesand(4)nongovernmentalentitiesreceivingsubsidyorequity,directlyorindirectly,fromorthroughthegovernment,whicharerequiredbylaworthegrantinginstitutiontosubmittosuchauditasaconditionofsubsidyorequity.
Hence,ifanentityisproperlyidentifiedandcategorizedasamongthoseenumeratedinSection2(1),ArticleIXDoftheConstitution,thentheCOAcanindisputablyexamine,audit,andsettleallaccountspertainingtotherevenueandreceiptsof,andexpendituresorusesoffundsandpropertyofthatparticularentity.
II.
HistoryoftheBSP
TheBoyScoutsofthePhilippinesbeganin1923withtheestablishmentofthe
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fon 3/24
PhilippineCounciloftheBoyScoutsofAmerica,whenthePhilippineswasanAmericanpossessionatthetime.2
On31October1936,thePhilippineNationalAssemblyenactedCommonwealthActNo.111,orAnActtoCreateaPublicCorporationtobeKnownastheBoyScoutsofthePhilippines,andtoDefineitsPowersandPurposes,thepertinentprovisionsofwhichread:
Section1.J.E.H.Stevenot,A.N.Luz,C.P.Romulo,VicenteLim,ManuelCamus,JorgeB.Vargas,andG.A.DazaallofManila,Philippines,theirassociatesandsuccessors,areherebycreatedabodycorporateandpoliticindeedandinlaw,bythename,styleandtitleofBoyScoutsofthePhilippines(hereinaftercalledthecorporation).xxx
Section3.Thepurposeofthiscorporationshallbetopromote,throughorganization,andcooperationwithotheragencies,theabilityofboystodothingsforthemselvesandothers,totraintheminscoutcraft,andtoteachthempatriotism,courage,selfreliance,andkindredvirtues,usingthemethodswhicharenowincommonusebyboyscouts.
Section4.Untilsuchtimeasthecorporationshallhaveacquiredbypurchase,giftorotherequitablearrangementfromandwiththeBoyScoutsofAmericaalloftheexistingassetsandpropertiesoftheaforesaidBoyScoutsofAmericainthePhilippines,itshallcarryonitsoperationsinaccordancewithsucharrangementsasitmaymakewithsaidBoyScoutsofAmericaandthecorporationcreatedbythisActshalldefrayandprovideforanydebtsorliabilitiestothedischargeofwhichsaidassetsoftheBoyScoutsofAmericashallbeapplicable,butsaidcorporationshallhavenopowertoissuecertificatesofstockortodeclareorpaydividends,itsobjectsandpurposesbeingsolelyofabenevolentcharacterandnotforpecuniaryprofitbyitsmembers.
Section5.ThegoverningbodyofthesaidcorporationshallconsistofanexecutiveboardcomposedofresidentsofthePhilippines.Thenumber,qualifications,andtermsofofficeofmembersoftheexecutiveboardshallbeprescribedbythebylaws.xxx
On17May1974,thenPresidentFerdinandE.MarcosissuedPresidentialDecreeNo.460,AmendingCertainProvisionsofCommonwealthActNo.111,OtherwiseKnownastheNationalCharteroftheBoyScoutsofthePhilippines.OneofitsWhereasclausesreads:
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fon 4/24
WHEREAS,recenteventshaveshownthatithasbecomenecessarytoeffectreformsintheorganizationsstructureinordertorevitalizeandstrengthenitsoperationalcapabilities,enhanceitseffectivenessasaninstrumenttopromotetheyouthdevelopmentprogramofthenation,andinsurethefullandactivecooperation,involvementandsupportofallsectorsofthecommunity,publicandprivatexxx
OneoftheamendmentsintroducedbyPD460pertainedtothecompositionoftheBSPsgoverningbody.PD460reorganizedandrestructured3theBSPsexecutiveboard,thus:
SectionII.Section5ofthesaidActisalsoamendedtoreadasfollows:
ThegoverningbodyofthesaidcorporationshallconsistofaNationalExecutiveBoardcomposedof(a)thePresidentofthePhilippinesorhisrepresentative(b)thecharterandlifemembersoftheBoyScoutsofthePhilippines(c)theChairmanoftheBoardofTrusteesofthePhilippineScoutingFoundation(d)theRegionalChairmanoftheScoutRegionsofthePhilippines(e)theSecretaryofEducationandCulture,theSecretaryofSocialWelfare,theSecretaryofLabor,theSecretaryofFinance,theSecretaryofYouthandSports,andtheSecretaryofLocalGovernmentandCommunityDevelopment(f)anequalnumberofindividualsfromtheprivatesector(g)theNationalPresidentoftheGirlScoutsofthePhilippines(h)oneScoutofSenioragefromeachScoutRegiontorepresenttheboymembershipand(i)threerepresentativesoftheculturalminorities.ExceptfortheRegionalChairmanwhoshallbeelectedbytheRegionalScoutCouncilsduringtheirannualmeetings,andtheScoutsoftheirrespectiveregions,allmembersoftheNationalExecutiveBoardshallbeeitherbyappointmentorcooption,subjecttoratificationandconfirmationbytheChiefScout,whoshallbetheHeadoftheState.VacanciesintheExecutiveBoardshallbefilledbyamajorityvoteoftheremainingmembers,subjecttoratificationandconfirmationbytheChiefScout.ThebylawsmayprescribethenumberofmembersoftheNationalExecutiveBoardnecessarytoconstituteaquorumoftheboard,whichnumbermaybelessthanamajorityofthewholenumberoftheboard.TheNationalExecutiveBoardshallhavepowertomakeandtoamendthebylaws,and,byatwothirdsvoteofthewholeboardatameetingcalledforthispurpose,mayauthorizeandcausetobeexecutedmortgagesandliensuponthepropertyofthecorporation.
xxxx(Emphasissupplied)
On6December1991,thenPresidentCorazonC.Aquino,pursuanttoherdelegatedlegislativeauthorityunderSection22ofProclamationNo.50,issuedExecutiveOrderNo.495convertingtheBSP,togetherwiththePhilippineShippersCouncilandtheGirlScoutsofthePhilippines,intoaprivatecorporation.However,on4March1992,PresidentAquinoissuedExecutiveOrderNo.509revokingthedissolutionandconversionoftheBSPintoaprivatecorporation,andrestoredCommonwealthActNo.111andPD460priortotheirrepealunderEO495.
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fon 5/24
On24March1992,RepublicActNo.7278,furtheramendingCommonwealthActNo.111,asamendedbyPD460,wasenacted.AimedatstrengtheningthevolunteeranddemocraticcharacteroftheBSP,RA7278amendedthecompositionofBSPsgoverningbodybydrasticallyreducingthenumberofCabinetsecretariesintheNationalExecutiveBoard,towit:
SEC.3.Sections5,6,7and8ofCommonwealthActNo.111,asamended,areherebyamendedtoreadasfollows:
SEC.5.ThegoverningbodyofthesaidcorporationshallconsistofaNationalExecutiveBoard,themembersofwhichshallbeFilipinocitizensofgoodmoralcharacter.TheBoardshallbecomposedofthefollowing:
(a)One(1)chartermemberoftheBoyScoutsofthePhilippineswhoshallbeelectedbythemembersoftheNationalCouncilatitsmeetingcalledforthispurpose
(b)Theregionalchairmenofthescoutsregionswhoshallbeelectedbytherepresentativesofallthelocalscoutscouncilsoftheregionduringitsmeetingcalledforthispurpose:Provided,Thatacandidateforregionalchairmanneednotbethechairmanofalocalscoutcouncil
(c)TheSecretaryofEducation,CultureandSports
(d)TheNationalPresidentoftheGirlScoutsofthePhilippines
(e)One(1)seniorscout,eachfromLuzon,VisayasandMindanaoareas,tobeelectedbytheseniorscoutdelegatesofthelocalscoutcouncilstothescoutyouthforumsintheirrespectiveareas,initsmeetingcalledforthispurpose,torepresenttheboyscoutmembership
(f)Twelve(12)regularmemberstobeelectedbythemembersoftheNationalCouncilinitsmeetingcalledforthispurpose
(g)Atleastten(10)butnotmorethanfifteen(15)additionalmembersfromtheprivatesectorwhoshallbeelectedbythemembersoftheNationalExecutiveBoardreferredtointheimmediatelyprecedingparagraphs(a),(b),(c),(d),(e)and(f)attheorganizationalmeetingofthenewlyreconstitutedNationalExecutiveBoardwhichshallbeheldimmediatelyafterthemeetingoftheNationalCouncilwhereinthetwelve(12)regularmembersandtheone(1)chartermemberwereelected.
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fon 6/24
xxxx
III.
TherulinginBSPv.NLRC
TheCOAreliesontheCourtsrulinginBoyScoutsofthePhilippinesv.NationalLaborRelationsCommission,4promulgatedon22April1991,declaringtheBSPbothaGOCCandagovernmentinstrumentality5withinthemeaningofSection2(1)ofArticleIXBoftheConstitution6basedonthefollowingcriteria:
Firstly,BSPsfunctionsassetoutinitsstatutorycharterdohaveapublicaspect.BSPsfunctionsdorelatetothefosteringofthepublicvirtuesofcitizenshipandpatriotismandthegeneralimprovementofthemoralspiritandfiberofouryouth.
xxxx
ThesecondaspectthattheCourtmusttakeintoaccountrelatestothegovernanceoftheBSP.ThecompositionoftheNationalExecutiveBoardoftheBSPincludesxxxseven(7)SecretariesofExecutiveDepartments.xxxWemustnoteatthesametimethattheappointmentsofmembersoftheNationalExecutiveBoard,exceptonlytheappointmentsoftheRegionalChairmanandScoutsofSenioragefromthevariousScoutRegions,aresubjecttoratificationandconfirmationbytheChiefScout,whoisthePresidentofthePhilippines.xxxItdoesappearthereforethatthereissubstantialgovernmental(i.e.,Presidential)participationorinterventioninthechoiceofthemajorityofthemembersoftheNationalExecutiveBoardoftheBSP.
ThethirdaspectrelatestothecharacteroftheassetsandfundsoftheBSP.TheoriginalassetsoftheBSPwereacquiredbypurchaseorgiftorotherequitablearrangementwiththeBoyScoutsofAmerica,ofwhichtheBSPwaspartbeforetheestablishmentoftheCommonwealthofthePhilippines.xxxInthisrespect,theBSPappearssimilartoprivatenonstock,nonprofitcorporations,althoughitscharterexpresslyenvisagesdonationsandcontributionstoitfromtheGovernmentandanyofitsagenciesandinstrumentalities.7(Emphasissupplied)
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fon 7/24
IV.
RepublicActNo.7278reducedthenumberof
CabinetsecretariesintheBSPgoverningbody.
WhenPD460,amendingCommonwealthActNo.111,wasissuedbythenPresidentMarcos,thePresidentofthePhilippinesandsixCabinetSecretarieswereamongthemembersoftheBSPsNationalExecutiveBoard.ThePresidentevenhadthefinalsayontheprivatesectorrepresentationintheBSPsgoverningbody.8TheleadershipoftheBSPwasvirtuallyundertheOfficeofthePresident.
WiththeenactmentofRA7278,onlyoneCabinetSecretary,thatis,theSecretaryofEducation,remainsamemberoftheBSPsNationalExecutiveBoard.TheBSPreliesonthisdrasticchangeinthecompositionofitsgoverningbodyforitsclaimthattheBSPisnotaGOCCsubjecttoCOAsauditjurisdiction.AccordingtotheBSP,RA7278tookouttheelementofgovernmentcontrol,whichisakintoprivatization.ItfollowsthenthatthefindinginBSPv.NLRCthattheBSPisaGOCCwithoriginalcharternolongerholdswater.RA7278wasenactedafterBSPv.NLRC.
V.
TheBSPisnotaGOCC.
1.Controltest
InFelicianov.CommissiononAudit,9theCourtdeclaredthatthedeterminingfactorof
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fon 8/24
COAsauditjurisdictionisgovernmentownershiporcontrolofthecorporation.CitingPhilippineVeteransBankEmployeesUnionNUBEv.PhilippineVeteransBank,10theCourtheldinFelicianothatthecriterionofownershipandcontrolismoreimportantthantheissueoforiginalcharter,thus:
ThispointisimportantbecausetheConstitutionprovidesinitsArticleIXB,Section2(1)thattheCivilServiceembracesallbranches,subdivisions,instrumentalities,andagenciesoftheGovernment,includinggovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationswithoriginalcharters.AstheBankisnotownedorcontrolledbytheGovernmentalthoughitdoeshaveanoriginalcharterintheformofR.A.No.3518,itclearlydoesnotfallundertheCivilServiceandshouldberegardedasanordinarycommercialcorporation.Section28ofthesaidlawsoprovides.TheconsequenceisthattherelationsoftheBankwithitsemployeesshouldbegovernedbythelaborlaws,underwhichinfacttheyhavealreadybeenpaidsomeoftheirclaims.11(Emphasissupplied)
EmployingthetestlaiddowninFelicianoindeterminingCOAsjurisdiction,wefindthattheBSPisnotaGOCC.
A.ThegovernmentdoesnotowntheBSP.
UnderSection2(13)oftheRevisedAdministrativeCode,12aGOCCreferstoanyagencyorganizedasastockornonstockcorporation,vestedwithfunctionsrelatingtopublicneedswhethergovernmentalorproprietaryinnature,andownedbytheGovernmentdirectlyorthroughitsinstrumentalitieseitherwholly,or,whereapplicableasinthecaseofstockcorporations,totheextentofatleastfiftyone(51)percentofitscapitalstock.
Undertheabovedefinition,aGOCCmustbeownedorcontrolledbythegovernment,andinthecaseofastockcorporation,atleastamajorityofitscapitalstockmustbeownedbythegovernment.Inthecaseofanonstockcorporation,byanalogy,atleastamajorityofthemembersmustbegovernmentofficialsholdingsuchmembershipbyappointmentordesignationbythegovernment.13
Inthiscase,theBSPisanonstockandnonprofitorganizationcomposedalmostentirelyofmemberscomingfromtheprivatesector,moreparticularlyboysrangingfromagesfour(knownasKIDScouts)toseventeen(knownasSENIORScouts).TheBSPisoneofthelargestScoutorganizationsintheworldtoday(afterGerakan
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fon 9/24
PramukaofIndonesiaandtheBoyScoutsofAmerica,firstandsecond,respectively)andisoneoftheworldsNationalScoutAssociationshavingthehighestpenetrationrate(Scoutdensity),withoneScoutoutoftwoboysofScoutingageenrolledintheScoutingprogram.14SincetheBSPiscomposedalmostentirelyofmembersandofficersfromtheprivatesector,theBSPisclearlynotownedbythegovernment.
B.ThegovernmentdoesnotcontroltheBSP.
PriortoRA7278,thePresidentofthePhilippinesandsixCabinetSecretarieswereamongthemembersoftheNationalExecutiveBoard.AccordingtoSenatorJoseA.LinaduringtheSenatedeliberationsonRA7278,the[voluntary]characterandthenongovernmentalcharacteroftheBoyScoutsofthePhilippineswasalteredbytheoldlaw,thusnecessitatingitsamendment.Moreimportantly,priortoRA7278,theappointmentofallothermembersofthegoverningboard,excepttheelectedregionalchairmenandseniorscoutrepresentatives,weremadesubjecttotheratificationandconfirmationofthePresidentofthePhilippines.15ThereisthereforenodoubtthatpriortoRA7278,thegovernmenthadeffectivecontrolofthestructureandmembershipoftheNationalExecutiveBoard.However,asclearlyintendedinRA7278,thegovernmentlostcontrolovertheBSPtotheprivatesectorupontheeffectivityofRA7278.
InFeliciano,16wefoundthatlocalwaterdistricts(LWDs)wereGOCCsconsideringthat,amongotherfactors,thegovernmentcontrolsLWDsbecauseunderPD198themunicipalorcitymayor,ortheprovincialgovernor,appointsalltheboarddirectorsofanLWDforafixedtermofsixyears.xxxLWDshavenoprivatestockholdersormembers.TheboardofdirectorsandotherpersonnelofLWDsaregovernmentemployeessubjecttocivilservicelawsandantigraftlaws.Inotherwords,wherethegovernmentappointsatleastamajorityofthemembersoftheboardofdirectorsofanentity,suchentityisundoubtedlyunderthecontrolofthegovernment.Likewise,ifthegovernmenthasthepowertofillupatleastamajorityofthevacanciesinthegoverningbodyofanentity,thensuchanentityisdefinitelygovernmentcontrolled.17
TheforegoingcircumstancesmanifestinggovernmentcontroloveranentityarewantinginBSPscaseunderRA7278.
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 10/24
AspointedoutbytheBSP,underRA7278onlyoneCabinetSecretaryremainsamemberoftheNationalExecutiveBoard,asopposedtothepreviouscompositionwherethePresidentofthePhilippinesandsixcabinetsecretariesweremembersofthesameboard.Torepeat,theNationalExecutiveBoardispresentlycomposedof(1)achartermemberoftheBSP(2)theregionalchairmenofthescoutsregions(3)theSecretaryofEducation,CultureandSports(4)NationalPresidentoftheGirlScoutsofthePhilippines(5)aseniorscout,oneeachfromLuzon,VisayasandMindanao(6)twelveregularmemberstobeelectedbythemembersoftheNationalCouncil(7)atleasttenbutnotmorethanfifteenadditionalmembersfromtheprivatesector.Significantly,thelonecabinetmember,whoistheEducationSecretary,merelyservesasanexofficiomember.18Meanwhile,thePresidentofthePhilippinesisnolongeramemberoftheNationalExecutiveBoardandsimplyactsastheChiefScoutoftheBSP.ExceptfortheEducationSecretary,noneoftheothermembersoftheNationalExecutiveBoardisagovernmentofficialorholdssuchpositionormembershipthroughappointmentordesignationbythegovernment.Moreover,thegovernmentlacksthepowertofillupvacanciesintheNationalExecutiveBoardoftheBSPorremoveanyofitsmembers.Infact,vacanciesintheNationalExecutiveBoardshallbefilledbyamajorityvoteoftheremainingmembers.19ThisstructuralsetupandmembershipofBSPsgoverningbodyunderRA7278,whereallexceptonecomefromtheprivatesector,glaringlynegateanyformofgovernmentcontrolovertheBSP.
Moreover,iftheBSPisaGOCC,aswhattheCOAinsists,thenitmustbeunderthePresidentspowerofcontrol.InRufinov.Endriga,20whichinvolvedthebattleforCulturalCenterofthePhilippines(CCP)leadershipbetweentheRufinoandEndrigagroups,theCourtexplainedexhaustivelythePresidentspowerofcontrol,thus:
Underoursystemofgovernment,allExecutivedepartments,bureaus,andofficesareunderthecontrolofthePresidentofthePhilippines.Section17,ArticleVIIofthe1987Constitutionprovides:
ThePresidentshallhavecontrolofalltheexecutivedepartments,bureaus,andoffices.Heshallensurethatthelawsbefaithfullyexecuted.(Emphasissupplied)
ThepresidentialpowerofcontrolovertheExecutivebranchofgovernmentextendstoallexecutiveemployeesfromtheDepartmentSecretarytothelowliestclerk.ThisconstitutionalpowerofthePresidentisselfexecutinganddoesnotrequireanyimplementinglaw.CongresscannotlimitorcurtailthePresidentspowerofcontrolovertheExecutivebranch.
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 11/24
xxx
ThePresidentspowerofcontrolappliestotheactsordecisionsofallofficersintheExecutivebranch.ThisistruewhethersuchofficersareappointedbythePresidentorbyheadsofdepartments,agencies,commissions,orboards.Thepowerofcontrolmeansthepowertoreviseorreversetheactsordecisionsofasubordinateofficerinvolvingtheexerciseofdiscretion.
Inshort,thePresidentsitsattheapexoftheExecutivebranch,andexercisescontrolofalltheexecutivedepartments,bureaus,andoffices.TherecanbenoinstanceundertheConstitutionwhereanofficeroftheExecutivebranchisoutsidethecontrolofthePresident.TheExecutivebranchisunitarysincethereisonlyonePresidentvestedwithexecutivepowerexercisingcontrolovertheentireExecutivebranch.AnyofficeintheExecutivebranchthatisnotunderthecontrolofthePresidentisalostcommandwhoseexistenceiswithoutanylegalorconstitutionalbasis.21
However,inthiscase,unlikeinCCPscase,22thereisabsolutelynothingwhichdemonstratesthatthePresidentofthePhilippinesexercisescontrolovertheactsordecisionsoftheBSPsNationalExecutiveBoardoranyofitsmembers.23ThePresidentdoesnothavethepowertoalterormodifyornullifyorsetasidewhattheBSPsNationalExecutiveBoarddoesintheperformanceofitsdutiesandtosubstitutethejudgmentoftheformerforthatofthelatter.24ThetitleChiefScoutdoesnotconferonthePresidentanypowerofcontrolovertheaffairsandmanagementoftheBSP.ThisabsenceofanyformofpresidentialcontrolreinforcesthefactthatthegovernmentdoesnotcontroltheBSP.Inshort,thePresident,whileholdingthetitleofChiefScout,doesnotcontroltheBSP.
C.ThefundsoftheBSPareprivateinnature.
TheCourtnotedinBSPv.NLRCthattheoriginalassetsoftheBSPwereacquiredbypurchaseorgiftorotherequitablearrangementwiththeBoyScoutsofAmerica,ofwhichtheBSPwaspartbeforetheestablishmentoftheCommonwealthofthePhilippines.TheBSPcharter,however,doesnotindicatethatsuchassetswerepublicor
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 12/24
statalincharacterorhadoriginatedfromthegovernment.NopubliccapitalwasinvestedintheBSP.25AccordingtotheBSP,itsoperatingfundsusedforcarryingoutitspurposesandprogramsarederivedprincipallyfrommembershipduespaidbytheBoyScoutsthemselvesandfrompropertyrentals.TheBSPdoesnothavegovernmentassetsanddoesnotreceiveanyappropriationfromCongress.ThiswasrevealedduringthedeliberationsintheHouseofRepresentativesonRA7278,thus:
MR.ESCUDERO.Yes,Mr.Chairman.Thequestionisthesourcesoffundsoftheorganization.First,Mr.Chairman,theBoyScoutsofthePhilippinesdonotreceiveannualallotmentfromthegovernment.Theorganizationhastoraiseitsownfundsthroughfunddrivesandfundcampaignsorfundraisingactivities.Asidefromthis,wehavesomerevenueproducingprojectsintheorganizationthatgivesusfundstosupporttheoperation.xxx26
Further,BSPspropertiesarebeingmanagedandoperatedbytheBSPitself,notbythegovernmentoranyofitsagencies.Therefore,itiscrystalclearthatthefundsoftheBSPcomefromprivatesources.Assuch,theBSPfundsarenecessarilybeyondthejurisdictionoftheCOA,whichexclusivelyauditspublicfundsandassets.
D.PublicpurposeofBSPisnotdeterminativeofstatus.
Indeed,theBSPperformsfunctionswhichmaybeclassifiedaspublicincharacter,inthesensethatitpromotesvirtuesofcitizenshipandpatriotismandthegeneralimprovementofthemoralspiritandfiberofouryouth.However,thisfactalonedoesnotautomaticallymaketheBSPaGOCC.Significantly,theCourtdeclaredinPhilippineSocietyforthePreventionofCrueltytoAnimalsv.CommissiononAudit,27thefactthatacertainjuridicalentityisimpressedwithpublicinterestdoesnot,bythatcircumstancealone,maketheentityapubliccorporation,inasmuchasacorporationmaybeprivatealthoughitschartercontainsprovisionsofapubliccharacter,incorporatedsolelyforthepublicgood.28TheCourtfurtherheld:
Authoritiesareoftheviewthatthepurposealoneofthecorporationcannotbetakenasasafeguide,forthefactisthatalmostallcorporationsarenowadayscreatedtopromotetheinterest,good,orconvenienceofthepublic.Abank,forexample,isaprivatecorporationyet,itiscreatedforapublicbenefit.Privateschoolsanduniversitiesarelikewiseprivatecorporationsandyet,theyarerenderingpublicservice.Privatehospitalsandwardsare
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 13/24
chargedwithheavysocialresponsibilities.Moresowithallcommoncarriers.Ontheotherhand,theremayexistapubliccorporationevenifitisendowedwithgiftsordonationsfromprivateindividuals.
Thetruecriterion,therefore,todeterminewhetheracorporationispublicorprivateisfoundinthetotalityoftherelationofthecorporationtotheState.IfthecorporationiscreatedbytheStateasthelattersownagencyorinstrumentalitytohelpitincarryingoutitsgovernmentalfunctions,thenthatcorporationisconsideredpublicotherwise,itisprivate.Applyingtheabovetest,provinces,charteredcities,andbarangayscanbestexemplifypubliccorporations.TheyarecreatedbytheStateasitsowndeviceandagencyfortheaccomplishmentofpartsofitsownpublicworks.29(Emphasissupplied)
2.Economicviabilitytest
TheConstitutionrecognizesonlytwoclassesofcorporations.30Thefirstreferstoprivatecorporationscreatedunderagenerallaw.31Thesecondreferstogovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationscreatedbyspecialcharters.32Section16,ArticleXIIoftheConstitutionprovides:
Sec.16.TheCongressshallnot,exceptbygenerallaw,providefortheformation,organization,orregulationofprivatecorporations.Governmentownedorcontrolledcorporationsmaybecreatedorestablishedbyspecialchartersintheinterestofthecommongoodandsubjecttothetestofeconomicviability.(Emphasissupplied)
Contrarytothisconstitutionalprovision,themajorityintroducesatotallydifferentspeciesofcorporation,whichisneitheraprivatecorporationnoragovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporation.ThemajoritygravelymissesthefactthattheBSP,whichwascreatedasanonstock,nonprofitcorporation,canonlybeeitheraprivatecorporationoragovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporation.TheLegislaturesusagein
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 14/24
CommonwealthActNo.111ofthetermpubliccorporation33todesignatetheBSPmustneverbeconstruedascreatinganentirelynewtypeofcorporation,neitherprivatenorgovernmentownedorcontrolled.Otherwise,suchaninterpretationwillunjustifiablyandunlawfullyexpandtheclassesofcorporationsexpresslyrecognizedbytheConstitutioninSection16,ArticleXII,puttingthenewclassofcorporationoutsidethecoverageofSection16.Inshort,suchnewclassofpubliccorporationcreatedbyspecialcharterwillnotbesubjecttothetestofeconomicviability,ablatantcircumventionoftheConstitution.
InManilaInternationalAirportAuthority(MIAA)v.CourtofAppeals,34wheretheCourtruledthatMIAAisagovernmentinstrumentality,theCourtexplainedtheimportanceofthetestofeconomicviability,inthiswise:
TheConstitutionexpresslyauthorizesthelegislaturetocreategovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationsthroughspecialchartersonlyiftheseentitiesarerequiredtomeetthetwinconditionsofcommongoodandeconomicviability.Inotherwords,Congresshasnopowertocreategovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationswithspecialchartersunlesstheyaremadetocomplywiththetwoconditionsofcommongoodandeconomicviability.Thetestofeconomicviabilityappliesonlytogovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationsthatperformeconomicorcommercialactivitiesandneedtocompeteinthemarketplace.BeingessentiallyeconomicvehiclesoftheStateforthecommongoodmeaningforeconomicdevelopmentpurposesthesegovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationswithspecialchartersareusuallyorganizedasstockcorporationsjustlikeordinaryprivatecorporations.
xxxTheintentoftheConstitutionistopreventthecreationofgovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationsthatcannotsurviveontheirowninthemarketplaceandthusmerelydrainthepubliccoffers.
CommissionerBlasF.Ople,proponentofthetestofeconomicviability,explainedtotheConstitutionalCommissionthepurposeofthistest,asfollows:
MR.OPLE:MadamPresident,thereasonforthisconcernisreallythatwhenthegovernmentcreatesacorporation,thereisasenseinwhichthiscorporationbecomesexemptfromthetestofeconomicperformance.Weknowwhathappenedinthepast.Ifagovernmentcorporationloses,thenitmakesitsclaimuponthetaxpayersmoneythroughnewequityinfusionsfromthegovernmentandwhatisalwaysinvokedisthecommongood.Thatisthereasonwhythisyear,outofabudgetofP115billionfortheentiregovernment,aboutP28billionofthiswillgointoequityinfusionstosupportafewgovernmentfinancialinstitutions.Andthisisalltaxpayersmoneywhichcouldhavebeenrelocatedtoagrarianreform,tosocialserviceslikehealthand
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 15/24
education,toaugmentthesalariesofgrosslyunderpaidpublicemployees.Andyetthisisallgoingdownthedrain.
Therefore,whenweinsertthephraseECONOMICVIABILITYtogetherwiththecommongood,thisbecomesarestraintonfutureenthusiastsforstatecapitalismtoexcusethemselvesfromtheresponsibilityofmeetingthemarkettestsothattheybecomeviable.Andso,MadamPresident,Ireiterate,forthecommitteesconsiderationandIamgladthatIamjoinedinthisproposalbyCommissionerFoz,theinsertionofthestandardofECONOMICVIABILITYORTHEECONOMICTEST,togetherwiththecommongood.
FatherJoaquinG.Bernas,aleadingmemberoftheConstitutionalCommission,explainsinhistextbookThe1987ConstitutionoftheRepublicofthePhilippines:ACommentary:
Thesecondsentencewasaddedbythe1986ConstitutionalCommission.Thesignificantaddition,however,isthephraseintheinterestofthecommongoodandsubjecttothetestofeconomicviability.Theadditionincludestheideasthattheymustshowcapacitytofunctionefficientlyinbusinessandthattheyshouldnotgointoactivitieswhichtheprivatesectorcandobetter.Moreover,economicviabilityismorethanfinancialviabilitybutalsoincludescapabilitytomakeprofitandgeneratebenefitsnotquantifiableinfinancialterms.35(Emphasissupplied)
Indisputably,agovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationcreatedbyspecialchartermustnecessarilymeetthetestofeconomicviability.Otherwise,thecreationbyCongressofagovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationnotsatisfyingthetestofeconomicviabilityclearlyrunscountertotheexpressmandateofSection16,ArticleXIIoftheConstitution.Congresshasnopowertocreategovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationswithspecialchartersunlesstheyaremadetocomplywiththetwoconditionsofcommongoodandeconomicviability.Torepeat,governmentownedorcontrolledcorporationsmaybecreatedorestablishedbyspecialchartersxxxsubjecttothetestofeconomicviability.Therefore,therecanbenopubliccorporationorgovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationthatcannotbesubjecttothetestofeconomicviability.Inshort,themajoritysviewthatBSPisapubliccorporationwhichdoesnotfallundereitheroftheclassificationsofcorporationrecognizedunderSection16,ArticleXIIoftheConstitution,andconsequentlynotsubjecttothetestofeconomicviability,ispatentlyerroneousandbaseless.
ThetermpubliccorporationreferstoagovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationasreferredtoinSection16,ArticleXIIoftheConstitution.However,inthiscase,theusageofthetermpubliccorporationinCommonwealthActNo.111todesignateBSPisnolongercontrollingindeterminingtherealnatureoftheBSP.AsamendedbyRA7278,CommonwealthActNo.111nowreferstoacorporationowned,managedandcontrolledbytheprivatesectoralthoughthepurposeofthecorporationremainspublic.
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 16/24
Themajoritytheorizesthatpubliccorporationsaretreatedbylawasagenciesorinstrumentalitiesofthegovernmentwhicharenotsubjecttothetestsofownershiporcontrolandeconomicviabilitybuttodifferentcriteriarelatingtotheirpublicpurposes/interestsorconstitutionalpoliciesandobjectivesandtheiradministrativerelationshiptothegovernmentoranyofitsDepartmentsorOffices.
Thistheoryfindsnobasisinlaw.AstheCourtemphaticallystatedinPhilippineSocietyforthePreventionofCrueltytoAnimals,thefactthatacertainjuridicalentityisimpressedwithpublicinterestdoesnot,bythatcircumstancealone,maketheentityapubliccorporation,inasmuchasacorporationmaybeprivatealthoughitschartercontainsprovisionsofapubliccharacter,incorporatedsolelyforthepublicgood.36NeitherdoesadministrativerelationshiptothegovernmentindicatethatanentityisaninstrumentalitywithinthepurviewoftheCOAsauditjurisdiction.Onlycorporationscontrolledandownedbythegovernment,whicharesubjecttothetestofeconomicviability,andgovernmentinstrumentalities,asdefinedbytheAdministrativeCode,fallunderCOAsauditjurisdiction.TheBSPisneitherhence,itisbeyondtheCOAsauditjurisdiction.
VI.
NeitheristheBSPagovernmentinstrumentality.
AgovernmentinstrumentalityisdefinedbytheRevisedAdministrativeCodeasanyagencyoftheNationalGovernment,notintegratedwithinthedepartmentframeworkvestedwithspecialfunctionsorjurisdictionbylaw,endowedwithsomeifnotallcorporatepowers,administeringspecialfunds,andenjoyingoperationalautonomy,usuallythroughacharter.Inotherwords,tobeconsideredagovernmentinstrumentality,anentitymustbe(1)anagencyoftheNationalGovernment(2)outsidethedepartmentframeworkoftheNationalGovernment(3)vestedwithspecialfunctionsorjurisdictionbylaw(4)endowedwithsome,ifnotall,corporatepowers(5)administeringspecialfundsand(6)enjoyingoperationalautonomy.
TheBSPisnotanagencyoftheNationalGovernmentbecausetheBSPisnotaunitoftheNationalGovernment,likeadepartment,bureau,office,instrumentalityorgovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporation,oralocalgovernmentoradistinctunittherein.37ThereisalsonodisputethattheBSPdoesnotadministerspecialfundsofthe
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 17/24
government.WhiletheBSPmayreceivedonationsorcontributionsfromthegovernmentjustlikeothernongovernmentorganizations,thesamecannotbecharacterizedasspecialfunds.Moreover,theBSPisnotvestedwithspecialfunctionsorjurisdictionbylaw.Hence,theBSPisnotagovernmentinstrumentality.
IftheBSPisagovernmentinstrumentality,thefollowingconsequencesareinevitable:(1)pursuanttoSection2(1),ArticleIXDoftheConstitution38itwillbesubjecttoCOAspreaudit,andnotpostaudit(2)itwillbesubjecttotheGovernmentProcurementReformActorRepublicActNo.9184and(3)theBSPsofficersandemployeeswillbeconsideredgovernmentpersonnelwhoare(a)subjecttoCivilServicelaws39(b)coveredbytheGovernmentServiceInsuranceSystem40(c)subjecttotheSalaryStandardizationLaw41(d)requiredtofileStatementsofAssets,LiabilitiesandNetworth42(e)underthejurisdictionoftheOmbudsman43and(f)subjecttothecontrolofthePresident.
UndertheAdministrativeCodeof1987,theBSPisanattachedagencyoftheDepartmentofEducationforpurposesofpolicyandprogramcoordination.However,thiswaschangedwiththeenactmentofRA7278whichremovedgovernmentcontrolovertheBSP.Torepeat,thedeterminingfactorofCOAsauditjurisdictionisgovernmentownershiporcontrol.Conversely,withoutsuchownershiporcontrol,theBSPisbeyondtheCOAsauditjurisdiction.Surprisingly,themajoritystatesthattheBSPisnotundergovernmentcontrolalthoughitisanattachedagencytotheDepartmentofEducation.Needlesstosay,theDepartmentofEducationandanyagencyorunitattachedtoitisunderthecontrolofthePresidentpursuanttoSection17,ArticleVIIoftheConstitution,whichmandatesthatthePresidentshallhavecontrolofalltheexecutivedepartments,bureaus,andoffices.Ifagovernmentoffice,unit,orinstrumentalityissubjecttothecontrolofthePresident,thenitisobviouslyundergovernmentcontrol.
VII.
TheBSPisaprivate,nonstock
andnonprofitcorporationperformingpublicfunctions.
Scoutingisanonpartisan,nongovernmentalworldwideyouthmovementgearedtowardsthedevelopmentofyoungpeopleinachievingtheirfullphysical,mental,social,
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 18/24
intellectualandspiritualpotentialsasindividuals,asresponsiblecitizensandasmembersoftheirlocal,national
andinternationalcommunities.44Scoutingcomplementstheschoolandthefamily,fillingtheneedsnotmetbyeither.45Itbelongstothecategoryofnonformaleducationsince,whileittakesplaceoutsidetheformaleducationalsystem,itisanorganizedinstitutionwithaneducationalaimandisaddressedtoaspecificclientele.46
InBoyScoutsofAmericav.Dale,47whichinvolvedasuitforreinstatementanddamagesfiledbyanAssistantscoutmaster,whowasexpelledafterhepubliclydeclaredhewashomosexual,againstBoyScoutsofAmerica(BSA),theSupremeCourtoftheUnitedStatesstatedthattheBoyScoutsisaprivate,notforprofitorganizationengagedininstillingitssystemofvaluesinyoungpeople.
ThefactthattheBSP,liketheBSA,isaprivate,nonstock,nonprofitcorporationisconsistentwiththeclearintentoftheLegislatureinenactingRA7278.ThefollowingexchangesduringthedeliberationsintheSenateonRA7278revealtheintentoftheLegislaturetorestorethenongovernmentalandprivatecharacteroftheBSP,thus:
SPONSORSHIPSPEECHOFSENATORLINA
SenatorLina.Thankyou,Mr.President.
Themeasurebeforeusthisevening,SenateBillNo.132,seekstostrengthenthenatureofScouting,restorethedemocraticandnongovernmentalprocesstothemovement,andprovideaframeworkofleadershipwhichshallgivedirectionandpurposetothetwomillionboysandyoungmen,agessevento17.Representativesofthevitalgroupofouryouthwereherethisafternoon,waitingthatthisbillbesponsoredtoday.48
xxxx
SenatorLina.BeforeIanswerthatquestion,Mr.President,originally,theboyscoutingmovementinthiscountryisintrinsicallydemocraticanditsstrengthderivesfromtheeffortsofthenongovernmentalsector.TheConstitutionofthemovementdeclaresthatitisindependent,voluntary,nonpolitical,nonsectarian,andnongovernmental.ThelocalandnationalleadershipoftheBoysScoutMovement,fromitsinceptionupto1974,whenitwas
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 19/24
amendedbyPresidentialDecreeNo.460,camefromelectedmembersoflocalcouncils,volunteerswhohaveworkedformanyyearsoftheirlivesforthedevelopmentofyoungboyssothattheywilllearnandheedthescoutoathandlaw.
However,Mr.President,inMay1974,thischaracterofthelocalboyscoutingmovementwasalteredbecausetheolddispensationissuedaPresidentialDecreewhichincludedinthemembershipofthegoverningboardthePresidentofthePhilippinesandsevenMembersoftheCabinet.ThatwasthemajorchangeinCommonwealthActNo.111.
So,thePresidentofthePhilippinesandsevenCabinetMemberswereincludedandinstitutionalizedasmembersofthegoverningbodyoftheBoyScoutsofthePhilippines.So,thenonvoluntary[sic]characterandthenongovernmentalcharacteroftheBoyScoutsofthePhilippineswasaltered.Notonlythat.
Allothermembersofthegoverningboard,excepttheelectedregionalchairmenandseniorscoutrepresentativesweremadesubjecttotheratificationandconfirmationofthePresidentofthePhilippines.So,iyonpoangnagingmajoramendmentnainistrodyusngPDNo.460.Andasaresultofthis,maramipoangnadiscouragesaboyscoutingmovement,sapagkatdatiratitalagangdemocraticiyan,walangsomuchimpositionfromgovernmentanditsofficials.Also,asaresultofPDNo.460,thevoluntarycharacteroftheboyscoutingmovementwaschanged.Halosnaginggobyerno,andimagine,thedictatorialcharacterofthatpreviousGovernmentwastransferredtotheBoyScoutsofthePhilippines,kasithemembersofthegoverningboardhavetobesubjectedtoconfirmationbythePresident.So,napulitikarinpoiyongboyscoutingthemovement.
Ngayon,angginagawaponatin,basically,istoremovethisundemocraticfeatureofthelawcreatingtheBoyScouts,andalsotoremovefromtheConstitutionofthepresentBoyScoutsofthePhilippinestheotherfeaturesthatmaketheboyscoutingmovementnowundemocractic.
SenatorGuingona.TheintentofthisbillistomakemoredemocraticthemembershipintheBoyScoutsofthePhilippines.
SenatorLina.Well,tolessengovernmentdirectinterference.49
============
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 20/24
SenatorLina.xxx
Noongarawaymasaktiboangboyscoutingmovement.Peronoong1974,whenPresidentialDecreewasissuedbythethenPresidentamendingCommonwealthActNo.111,iyonpongNationalExecutiveBoard,thegoverningbody,aynapasukannghalospitongCabinetMembers.Dariratipo,walaiyon.IyonpolamangDepartmentofEducation,CultureandSportsandkasamasaBoyScoutsofthePhilippines.KungsinoangSecretary,iyonangnagigingexofficioorinstitutionalizedmember.Pero,nangmadagdaganitongmiyembromulasaDepartmentofNationalDefense,fromtheotherdepartments,patiDSWD,naginggovernmenthalosangcharacternito.Nawalanaiyongspiritofvoluntarism.SincetheCabinetMembersarebusydoingotherthings,hindipoitonabigyannggaanongpansinkungkayanagdeterioratenangmalakiangscoutingmovementofthePhilippines.Ngayonlamangpoitonarerevive,becauseSecretaryCarinoisthePresident.Rightnowheisverymuchinvolved.HeaspresidentbeforehebecametheSecretaryofEducation,CultureandSports.Underhisleadership,thingsareshapingup.Thereisgreaterrecruitmentandmoreactivities.
SenatorRomulo.Kayapo,mahalagaangbillnaito,sapagkatibinabaliknatinitosaprivatesectoratnangsaganoon,gayanoongnakaraan,thisismoreconducivetovoluntarismandtherefore,tothegrowthoftheBoyScoutmovement.
SenatorLina.Opo.50(Emphasissupplied)
ThereisnoquestionthatRA7278wasenactedpreciselytoremovegovernmentcontrolandreturntheBSPtotheprivatesectorandtoitsnongovernmentalstatus.Inotherwords,thegovernmentlostcontrolovertheBSPtotheprivatesectorupontheeffectivityofRA7278.Theabsenceofgovernmentcontrolorownership,coupledwiththeprivatenatureofBSPfunds,makestheBSPaprivatecorporationbeyondtheauditjurisdictionoftheCOA.Clearly,theattributesofBSPsrelationshipwiththeStatethatpointtoitsbeingaprivatenonstockcorporationareoverwhelmingandirrefutable.51
VIII.
ConstitutionalityofBSPcharter,asamended
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 21/24
SincetheBSPisnotaGOCC,canCongresscreate,organizeandregulatetheBSPbyenactingitscharter,orCommonwealthActNo.111,asamendedbyPD460andfurtheramendedbyRA7278?
Theanswerisinthenegative.
Section7,ArticleXIVofthe1935Constitution,asamended,wasinforcewhentheBSPwascreatedbyspecialcharteron31October1936.Section7,ArticleXIVofthe1935Constitution,asamended,reads:
SEC.7.TheCongressshallnot,exceptbygenerallaw,providefortheformation,organization,orregulationofprivatecorporations,unlesssuchcorporationsareownedorcontrolledbytheGovernmentoranysubdivisionorinstrumentalitythereof.
Thesubsequent1973and1987Constitutionscontainsimilarprovisions.Thus,Section4,ArticleXIVofthe1973Constitutionprovides:
SEC.4.TheNationalAssemblyshallnot,exceptbygenerallaw,providefortheformation,organization,orregulationofprivatecorporations,unlesssuchcorporationsareownedorcontrolledbytheGovernmentoranysubdivisionorinstrumentalitythereof.
The1987ConstitutionsubstantiallyreiteratedtheaboveprovisioninSection16,ArticleXII,towit:
SEC.16.TheCongressshallnot,exceptbygenerallaw,providefortheformation,organization,orregulationofprivatecorporations.Governmentownedorcontrolledcorporationsmaybecreatedorestablishedbyspecialchartersintheinterestofthecommongoodandsubjecttothetestofeconomicviability.
InFeliciano,52theCourtdiscussedthesignificanceoftheaboveConstitutionalprovisioninthiswise:
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 22/24
TheConstitutionemphaticallyprohibitsthecreationofprivatecorporationsexceptbyagenerallawapplicabletoallcitizens.Thepurposeofthisconstitutionalprovisionistobanprivatecorporationscreatedbyspecialcharters,whichhistoricallygavecertainindividuals,familiesorgroupsspecialprivilegesdeniedtoothercitizens.
Inshort,Congresscannotenactalawcreatingaprivatecorporationwithaspecialcharter.Suchlegislationwouldbeunconstitutional.Privatecorporationsmayexistonlyunderagenerallaw.Ifthecorporationisprivate,itmustnecessarilyexistunderagenerallaw.Stateddifferently,onlycorporationscreatedunderagenerallawcanqualifyasprivatecorporations.Underexistinglaws,thatgenerallawistheCorporationCode,exceptthattheCooperativeCodegovernstheincorporationofcooperatives.
TheConstitutionauthorizesCongresstocreategovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporationsthroughspecialcharters.Sinceprivatecorporationscannothavespecialcharters,itfollowsthatCongresscancreatecorporationswithspecialchartersonlyifsuchcorporationsaregovernmentownedorcontrolled.(Emphasissupplied)
WhilebothBSPandCOAsubmitthatCommonwealthActNo.111anditsamendatorylawsdonotviolateSection16,ArticleXIIoftheConstitution,theCourtshouldrejectsuchcontention.ConsideringthattheBSPisnotaGOCC,itfollowsthatthelawcreatingandregulatingtheBSPclearlyviolatesSection16,ArticleXIIoftheConstitutionwhichspecificallystatesthatCongressshallnot,exceptbygenerallaw,providefortheformation,organization,orregulationofprivatecorporations,unlesssuchcorporationsareownedorcontrolledbytheGovernmentoranyofitssubdivisionorinstrumentality.
Inthiscase,theCourtdirectedthepartiestocommentontheissueoftheconstitutionalityofCommonwealthActNo.111,asamended.ThisispreciselybecausetheconstitutionalityofCommonwealthActNo.111,asamended,isinextricablylinkedtotheissueofwhethertheBSPissubjecttoCOAsauditjurisdiction,whichinturndependsonwhethertheBSPisaprivateoragovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporation.Hence,thisissuewasproperlyaddressedandexhaustivelyargueduponbytheparties.
ThatthepartiesdidnotspecificallyraisetheissueontheconstitutionalityofCommonwealthActNo.111,asamended,doesnotprecludethisCourtfromresolvingsuchissuesinceitisabsolutelyindispensableforthecompletedispositionofthiscase.Infact,inexceptionalcases,suchasthis,itiswithintheCourtsdiscretionwhena
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 23/24
constitutionalissuemayberuledupon.ItislikewisethedutyofthisCourttopassupontheconstitutionalityofCommonwealthActNo.111,asamended,sinceitclearlyappearsthatadeterminationoftheconstitutionalquestionisnecessarytodecidethiscase.InPeoplev.Vera,53theCourtheld:
Itistruethat,asageneralrule,thequestionofconstitutionalitymustberaisedattheearliestopportunity,sothatifnotraisedbythepleadings,ordinarilyitmaynotberaisedatthetrial,andifnotraisedinthetrialcourt,itwillnotconsideredonappeal.Butwemuststatethatthegeneralruleadmitsofexceptions.Courts,intheexerciseofsoundsdiscretion,maydeterminethetimewhenaquestionaffectingtheconstitutionalityofastatuteshouldbepresented.Thus,incriminalcases,althoughthereisaverysharpconflictofauthorities,itissaidthatthequestionmayberaisedforthefirsttimeatanystageoftheproceedings,eitherinthetrialcourtoronappeal.Evenincivilcases,ithasbeenheldthatitisthedutyofacourttopassontheconstitutionalquestion,thoughraisedforthefirsttimeonappeal,ifitappearsthatadeterminationofthequestionisnecessarytoadecisionofthecase.
Unless,therefore,theconstitutionalquestionisthustimelyraisedandpresented,itwillbeconsideredwaived,exceptinextraordinarycasesnotedinPeopleandHongkong&ShanghaiBankingCorporationvs.VeraandCuUnjieng,supra,orinexceptionalcaseswhere,theopinionofthiscourt,thequestionmaybesaidtobefairlyinvolveduponthefaceoftheundisputedrecord.(Emphasissuppliedcitationsomitted)
InRobbv.People,54theCourtreiterated:
Unless,therefore,theconstitutionalquestionisthustimelyraisedandpresented,itwillbeconsideredwaived,exceptinextraordinarycasesnotedinPeopleandHongkong&ShanghaiBankingCorporationvs.VeraandCuUnjieng,supra,orinexceptionalcaseswhere,theopinionofthiscourt,thequestionmaybesaidtobefairlyinvolveduponthefaceoftheundisputedrecord.(Emphasissupplied)
InMoldexRealty,Inc.v.HousingandLandUseRegulatoryBoard,55thisCourtheldthatconstitutionalchallengecanbemadeanytime:
Thatthequestionofconstitutionalityhasnotbeenraisedbeforeisnotavalidreasonforrefusingtoallowittoberaisedlater.Acontraryrulewouldmeanthatalaw,otherwiseunconstitutional,wouldlapseintoconstitutionalitybythemerefailureoftheproperpartytopromptlyfileacasetochallengethesame.(Emphasissupplied)
TheConstitutionprohibitsthecreationofaprivatecorporationthroughaspeciallaw.TheConstitutionalprohibitionunderSection16,ArticleXIIisclear,categorical,
-
7/1/2015 G.R.No.177131
data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Cp%20style%3D%22marginright%3A%200in%3B%20marginleft%3A%200in%3B%20fontsize%3A%20medium%3B%20fo 24/24
absolute,andadmitsofnoexception.SincetheBSPisaprivatecorporationandnotagovernmentownedorcontrolledcorporation,Sections1,562,573,585,596,607,619,62and1163ofCommonwealthActNo.111,asamended,areunconstitutional,andhencevoid,forcontraveningtheConstitutionalproscriptionagainstthecreation,organization,andregulationofprivatecorporationsbyCongress.
Therestoftheprovisions,namely,Sections4,648,65and1066ofCommonwealthActNo.111,asamended,remainvalidasthesedonotrefertoBSPscreationasacorporationandthus,donotviolatetheprohibitionunderSection16,ArticleXIIoftheConstitution.Moreover,Section5ofRA7278,amendingCommonwealthActNo.111,providesforaseparabilityclause.67
Insum,theBSPisaprivatecorporationbeyondtheauditjurisdictionoftheCOA.Accordingly,thespecificprovisionsintheBSPchartercreatingtheBSPasaprivatecorporationarevoid.ConsideringtheConstitutionalinfirmityofitscreation,BSPsrecourseiseithertoincorporateundertheCorporationCodeofthePhilippinesortoexistasanunincorporatedassociation.
ACCORDINGLY,IvotetoGRANTthepetition.TheBoyScoutsofthePhilippinesisaprivatecorporationbeyondtheauditjurisdictionoftheCommissiononAudit.Sections1,2,3,5,6,7,9,and11ofCommonwealthActNo.111,asamendedbyPresidentialDecreeNo.460andRepublicActNo.7278,arevoidforbeingviolativeoftheprohibitioninSection16,ArticleXIIoftheConstitution.
ANTONIOT.CARPIOAssociateJustice