BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / 5111. Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative...
-
Upload
rosaline-sabrina-walsh -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / 5111. Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative...
BOT / GEOG / GEOL
4111 / 5111
Field Data Collection and GPS
Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative
sitesUsed for classification (training data),
information extraction, and validation (accuracy assessment)
Collecting field data for remote sensing
Accurate field data permit us to match areas in the imagery to corresponding areas on the ground
Field data must be suitable for specific task
Field data must be appropriate for the scale (and resolution) of the remotely sensed imagery(!!!)
Field data must be associated with accurate spatial location
Field reconnaissance
Matching cover types to imagery
Dunes
Reed stands
Nominal dataQualitative/categorical designation of features
E.g., Forest, cropland, turbid water, etc.
Biophysical dataMeasurements of physical characteristics
E.g., Height, diameter, and volume of trees in a forest plot
Texture, color, and mineralogy of the soil surfaceEtc.
Site characteristicsCharacters of the area that may be relevant to
classification or other applications (e.g., topography)
Types of field data that may be needed
Ideally occurs at least three times during a projectBefore the interpretation of imagery starts
Develop an understanding of study areaDuring the interpretation process
Address uncertainties in classification/interpretation
After interpretation – detect and resolve problemsAssess accuracy before publishing maps and
reports
Field visits for information collection
Match the classification scheme (explicit definitions of types/personnel training)
Sites spread throughout the study area (capture as much variability as possible)
All land cover/use classes are representedAppropriate sampling design
Guidelines for collecting field data
Field visits: on the ground
Field visits: from the air
Can sometimes use high resolution data instead of going to the field (e.g. Google Earth)
Field visits: virtual trips
Can be biased or unbiased depending on your purposeBiased – useful for building models for
classification, etc., but not useful for statistical generalization about the entire area
Unbiased – can be used to generalize from a sample to a larger area or population
Field data collection
Must know the probability of visiting any pixel
Simple random samplingSites distributed randomly throughout the
study areaStratified random sampling
Sites distributed based on the areas of classes within the study area
Systematic samplingSites are distributed based on certain fixed
criteria such as distance (e.g., a site every 100 m along a transect)
Unbiased (random) sampling
Fully Random SampleDistribute sample points randomly across the
entire map area without regard to the various types.
Statistically robust but labor intensive.Usually not very efficient!
Simple random sampling design
°°
°
°
°
°
°
°°
°
° °
°
0
1
2
3
0 3
2
1
A
B
C
Stratified Random SamplingInsures that all of the types on your map get
sampledAn efficient way to gather enough data to do
accuracy assessmentInsures that rare types get sampledCan gather less sites for types that are very
accurate (e.g. open water)Unbiased – can calculate the probability of
sampling any pixel
Stratified Sample Design
°°
°
°
°
°
°
°°
°
° °
°
0
1
2
3
0 3
2
1
°
°
°
°°
°
°
°
°
°
°
°°
°
°
°
°
Systematic Sample Design
° °° °° °° ° ° ° °°0
1
2
3
0 3
2
1
° °° °° °° ° ° ° °°
° °° °° °° ° ° ° °°
° °° °° °° ° ° ° °°
° °° °° °° ° ° ° °°
° °° °° °° ° ° ° °°
° °° °° °° ° ° ° °°
° °° °° °° ° ° ° °°° °° °° °° ° ° ° °°
-- Samples regularly spaced but origin of design is randomly chosen-- Unbiased
Can be used for training data, understanding the study site, etc.
Can’t determine the probability of visiting a particular pixelE.g., sampling places that are easy to
access (along roads, on public land, etc.)Looking for “good” examples of typesUsing available incomplete data
Biased Sampling
Include site location information (point, line, or area (polygon) and information to extend these beyond the field site if possible.
Consider spatial uncertainty on the ground and in the imagery!
Accurately record relevant ground characteristics.
Field data should …
Field data – points
You must be able to extrapolate to some area around the point based on your field notes
You must recognize that there may be spatial error in the point location
Usually a good idea to include notes describing location of point relative to features that might be visible on the imagery (roads, land cover boundaries, etc.)
If you collect points
CR 4-1b Facing South Firehole T21N, R108, S 20 11.3
Lines
They must represent some area that you can find when you are back in the lab.
Requires unbiased sampling and good field notes.
Line transects should be long enough to capture variability in the area
If you use line sampling
Field data – areas (polygons)
You must accurately characterize what is inside each polygon.
You must recognize spatial uncertainty in the polygon boundaries.
You must collect areas large enough to find with some certainty on the image (generally at least 3 pixels x 3 pixels)
If you collect areas (polygons)
Uses 3 or more satellites (4 or more for accuracy) to “trilaterate” (not triangulate) to a position
Requires relatively unobstructed view of the sky
Accuracy varies depending on equipment and conditions
GPS
GPS receiversRecreational, mapping, or survey grade
instruments have different accuracyRecreational: ~5 - 10 m accuracy; $100 - $600Mapping: ~ 1 - 3 m accuracy; $1000 - $3000Survey: 1 cm accuracy or better; > $10,000
On-screen digitizing on an image in the field
Annotations on topographic mapsScale should match the application
Collecting location information in the field
Recreational grade: Garmin, etc., -- good enough for many RS applications. Pay attention to accuracy and data collection modes
Mapping grade: Trimble, etc.. High end data collection modes. Best choice for most RS applications
Survey grade: Trimble, etc. – most accurate. Rigorous time consuming data collection. Usually not required for RS, but might be for some applications.
Choosing GPS Equipment
Remember that field data collection for remote sensing is different than for many traditional ecological studies.
You must think about spatial uncertainty!
Last word…