BosweLL - dos.ny.gov · APR $ 0 20tg rrySDOS Planning & Development Re: US Army Corps of Engineers...

BosweLL ENGTNEERTNG ENGINEERS T SURVEYORS T PI.ANNERS T SCIENNSTS

330 PhillipsAvenue . P.O. Box 3152. South Hackensack, N.J. 07606-1722. (2011il1-0770 . Fax (201) il1-183i

VIA FEDEX

April 23, 20Lg

Ms. Katherine PijanowskiProject ManagerUS Army Corps of Engineers, NY DistrictAttn: Regulatory Branch, Room 193726 Eederal PLazaNew York, NY 10278-0090

' Reeeived -q

APR $ 0 20tg

rrySDOSPlanning & Development

Re: US Army Corps of EngineersNationwide Permit 3 ApplicationRestoration of the Byram River BulkheadVilIage of Port ChesterWestchester County, New JerseyOur FiIe No. 75-192

Dear Ms. Pijanowski:

We are submitting herewith an ACOE Individual- Permit Application for theabove referenced site.

The project involves the repair of a collapsed bulkhead along 1,600linear feet of an existing bulkhead, as well- as, the installation of anelevated pedestrian bridge.

Encfosed herewith for your review and approval please find the following:

1. One (1) original and one (1) copy of an US Army Corps of EngineersNationwide Permit No. 3 for the Emergency BoaL Ramp along theHackensack River consisting of:

I. JOINT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FORM

II. SUPPLEMENT TO ENGINEERING FORM 4345 (NANY FORM-201)

ITI. ENVIRONMENTAI QUESTIONNAIRE

APPENDICES:

Appendix A: Directions to the Site

Appendix B: Project Summary

Appendix C: Site Description

Appendix D: Previous Work

F-2017-0792 JS

Ms. Katherine Pijanowski, Project Manager Army Corps of Engineers April 23, 2018

Appendix E :

Appendix F:

Appendix G:

Appendix H:

Appendix I:

Appendix J:

Appendix K:

Appendix L:

FIGURES:

Property Owners within 300 Feet

Site Photographs

Project Maps

General Conditions

Natural Heritage Database Search

Phase lA Archeological & Historic Resources Assessment

Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF)

Design Plan & Details

A. U.S . G.S . Quadrangle Map B. Tax Assessment Map C. NYSDEC National Wetland Inventory Map D. SSURGO Soil Survey Map E. Aerial View Map F. FEMA Flood Mapping (Effective & Proposed FIRM Panels) G. Google Street View Maps

If you should have any questions or require additional information , please do not hes i tate to contact me directly .

FJR/cr Enclosures

Very truly yours ,

cc : Mr . Christopher D. Steers (w . enc . ) Village Manager Village of Port Chester Ms. Rebecca Crist (w/o encs . ) NYS Department of Environmenta l Conservation Mr. Brian P. Thompson (w. encs . ) CT Dept. of Energy & Environmental Protection

180423crll acoe

tT

INEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Federal Consistency Assessment Form

Received

AUG 2 5 ?017

NYSDOSPlanning & Development

T

T

T

T

T

An applicant, seeking a permit, license, waiver, certification or similar type of approval from a federal agency which is

subjectto theNew York State Coastal ManagementProgram(CMP), shall completethis assessment form for anyproposedactivity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This form is intended to assist an applicantin certiffing that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State's CMP as required by U.S. Department ofCommerce regulations (15 CFR 930.57). It should be completed at the time when the federal application is prepared. The

Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in its review of the applicant'scertification of consistency.

A. APPLICANT (please print)

Christopher D. Steers, Village Manager1. Name:

222 Grace Church Street, Port Chester NY 105732. Address:

IIT

tT

tIT

3. Telephone: Area Code PL5939-2200

B. PROPOSED ACTIVITY

l. Brief description of activity:

The proiect involves the repair of a collapsed bulkhead and waterfront walkway that wasdamaged during Hurricane Sandy. Additionally, the Village is proposing the installation of apedestrian bridge.

3. Location of activity:

Westchester Village of Port Chester Terminus of Westchester Ave

2. PurposSplgglty

2- oublic access to the waterfront. 3- safetv imrestoration of public open space

County

4. Type of federal permit/license required:

City, Town, or Village

ACOE Nationwide Permit No. 3

Street or Site Description

5. Federal application number, if known:

6. If a state permit/license was issued or is required for the proposed activity, identifu the state agency and provide the

application or permit number, if known:

NYDEC Tidal Wetlands Permit, Protection of Waters and Water Quality Certificate

N/A

tT

t

IIItIT

IT

T

T

T

IIT

T

T

IT

T

C. COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either "YES" or "NO" for each of these questions. The numbers following eachquestion refer to the policies described in the CMP document (see footnote on page 2) which may be affected [y theproposed activity.

1 Will the proposed activity result in any of the following:

a.Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which wiil require the preparationof an environmental impact statement? (11,22,25, 32,37 ,39,41, 43)b. Physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreline, landunder water or coastal waters? (2, Il, lZ,20,28,35, 44)c. Revitalization/redevelopment of a deteriorated or underutilized waterfront site? (1)d. Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? (19, 20)e. Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9,10) . . .

f. Siting ofa facility essential to the exploration, development and production ofenergy resourcesin coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf? (29) . .

g. Siting of a facility essential to the generation or transmission of ener gy? (27)h. Mining, excavation, or dredging activities, or the placement of dredged or fill material incoastal waters? (15, 35)i. Discharge oftoxics, hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters? (g, 15, 35)j. Draining of stormwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33) . .

k. Transport, storage, treatment, or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36,39) .

I' Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors? (4) . . .

2. Will the proposed activity affect or be located in, on, or adjacent to any of the following:

a. State designated freshwater or tidal wetland? (44)b. Federally designated flood andlor state designated erosion hazard, area? (11, 12, 17,) . . . . .

c. State designated significant fish and/or wildlife habitat? (7)d. State designated significant scenic resource or area? (24)e. State designated important agdcultural lands? (26) .

f. Beach, dune or barrier island? (12) . .

g. Major pons of Albany, Buffalo, Ogdensburg, Oswego or New york? (3)h. State, county, or local park? (19, 20)i. Historic resource listed on the National or State Register of Historic places? (23)

3. Will the proposed activity require any of the following:

a. Waterfront site? (2, 21,22)

YES /NO

atrtrtr

YES /NO

YES /NO

tr_ -trtr_ .EMEtr_ -trNEE_ .trEI .Etr_.EE1 .trNE

EEEEtrEEEE

E- -EtrtrMEm-EME

trmtr-mEBmt}n

b' Provision of new public services or infrastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populatedsections ofthe coastal area? (5)c. construction or reconstruction of a flood or erosion control structure? (13, 14,1 6) . . . . . .

d. State water quality permit or certification? (30, 38, 40)e. State air quality permit or certification? (41,43)

4. Will the proposed activity occur within and/or affect an area covered by a State approved localwaterfront revitalizationprogram? (see policies in localprogramdocument) . . . . . . . . _ats

T

IT

tIItT

IT

D. ADDITIONAL STEPS

t. If all of the questions in Section C are answered uNou, then the applicant or agency shall complete SectionE and submit the documentation required by Section F.

2' If any of the questions in Section C are answered "YES,, then the applicant or agent is advised to consult tle CMp, orwhere appropriate, the local waterfront revitalization program documenti. The propised activitymust be analyzed in moredetail with respect to the applicable state or local coastal policies. On a separate page(s), the applicant or agent shall: (a)identift, by their policy numlers, which coastal policies are affected by tile activity, irjj uri"riv assess the effects of theactivity upon the policy; and, (c) state how the activity is consistent with each policy. iollowing the completion of thiswritten assessment, the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the-documentafon requirid by SectionF.

E. CERTIFICATION

The applicant or agent must certifr that the proposed activity is consistent with the State's CMp or the approved localwaterfront revitalization program, as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made, the proposed activity shall not beundertaken. If this certification can be made, complete this Section.

"The proposed activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management program, or with the applicableapproved local waterfront revitalization prograrn, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program.,,

Applicant/Agent's Name: christopher D' steers' vi I lage Manager

Address: 222 Grace Church Street, port Chester Ny 10573

T

IT

T

IT

Telephone: Area Code (914 ) 939-2200

Applicant/Agent's

F. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

l ' The applicant or agent shall submit the following documents to the New York State Department of State, Officeof Coastal, Local Government and Community Sustainability, Attn: Consistency neview Unit, I CommercePlaza,99 \ilashington Avenue - Suite 1010, Albany, New york 12231.

a. Copyoforiginal signed forrn.b. Copy ofthe completed federal agency application.c. Other available inforrnation which would support the certification of consistency.

2' The applicant or agent shall also submit a copy of this completed form along with his/her application to the federalagency.

3. If there are any questions regarding the submission of this forrn, contact the Departrnent of State at(5r8) 474-6000.

*These state and local documentsare available for inspection at the offices ofmany federal agencies, Department of environmentalconservation and Deparhnent of state regional offices, an{ t}re appropriate regional and couity plaminj agencies. Local programdocuments are also available for inspection at the offices ofthe aiiropri ateloialgovernment.T

T

I

ItT

tIIItT

T

IT

IT

T

T

tIT

Compliance with Coastal Policies

The proposed project is in compJiance with the relevant New York State Department of state coatalPolicy's:

Policy 2

Facilitate the siting of water-dependent uses and facilities on or adiacent to coastal watetsTlere h a,frnite anoant of watefont t?ace suitablefor deuela?nenr?ur?otet. Consequentb, while the clemand.{or aty giuen?ie*d?ro?ertJ wil/f/uctuate in res?onrc lo uarying eronomic and ncia/ conditiont, on a siatewicle bais. the only reinori/r- -

e&edation h that /ongJerm demand_for waterfront s?ace will intent&

The lradiliona/ method of land allocation. i.e.. the real efiate market, with or withaut local laod ,r, ,ortrolr. ofi,r* littl,a$urdnce that tlm which re?uire wate{ront itet will. in,fact. haue accer to the 6 State's coailal *rlro To ,rrrrc thot ,rrh"water-dQendent" uw can continae to be accommodaled within the State, State agenciet will autid urdrrtrkirr.,farditxg 0r4??roa.inSnon-water de?endent atet when sach uw wouldpreem?t the reasonabb,krueeable cleuelo?ment oj:witi, depeidruturer;.{arthermore. a*encie.r will atiliz"e a??roPriate exiiling?rograms to encoarage water dependefi)ciluitiet.

Valer de?endent actiuilies rhall not .be cousidered a Priqate nuiunce, ?rouidetl tuch actiuitiet were comrnencecl prior to th,Mtr1andin{ actiuitiet and haue not been detenzined to be the caurc o=f conditiow dangerow to life or hrnlth oid o^ dirtorbor*t0 eU7Jment 0f land and water.hat not ruateial4t inrea$d. A water de?endent use * an actiiiq/ which ,r, trb"b, ,rrdrrtrd ,r.in. zuer or adrent to a water bo@ because ruch actiuilt requiret dirett acler to that water bod, and. which inioluet, o, o,integralpax o{such atiaiu, the use of the warer.

The Village of Pot Chestet is subject to a Local STaterfront Revitalization program pWRp) thateflcourages the maintenance and enhancement of existing public waterfront recreation. The publicpromenade provides direct access to the waterftont and supports various water dependent uses. Acopy of the Village of Pott Chestet's Final LWRP can be found at l'rtrps://docsdos.ni,.gov/opd-h"'rp /L\\&,P /Port94,20Ch es ter V / I n dex. html

Policy 7

Significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats will be protected, preserved, and wherepractical, restored so as to maintain their viabilitv as habitats.

HdbitatprLtectiLn h recTgtxi?"ed 4r,fundamental t0 d$aring the ialaiual ,j:j?rh dftd wildllfe?o?lilatiant. C:el.tain habitdtr areParticuldrltlcritical to the maintenance qf agiuen?o?ulation and, there"fore, meit t?enalpritectioo. Sorh hnbitotr r*hibit orc o,

The proposed ptoject is considered a maintenance activity required to repair an existing previouslyauthorized watetftont bulkhead and adjacent promenade. The project has been d.rign.d to minimizetemPorary distutbances to existing aquatic biota and will have no long term adverse;ffects on coastalfi sh/wildlife habitats.

Policy 2l

Water-dePendent and water-enhanced tecreation will be encoutaged and facilitated, and wiflbe girr.n p.iority orr.r rorr-*ut.r-r.lat.d,r..d ulorrg th" .ou.t.

Vater-related recreation incl14es wch obuioasb water-cle?endent actiuitiet as boating. wimming. and_fithing, as we/l at certoi,actiaitie| which are enhanced ltJ a coailal /otation and increay thegeneralpublilt iccess to the"roortiorh nr?rdrrtiro ordbi?Cle traih,Picnic areat venic ouerlooks, andpaxiue recreation ireas th)t tuke adaort* o,f ,*rtol ,r*rr.

T

IIT

T

IT

T

T

T

T

IT

tT

T

tIT

l'TOwa€a lD€ d€U€l0D/71€/1[ 0l Wd[€1r-f0lat€d f€tY€dll0lX ZJ t'011llil€fit 2ytlh t/le jbre|eruatnn nnd pnhnn,:pmpn/ nl rurh itatnrtnut rnn

retourcet at,lith and wi/dlzfe habitah. ae$hetirul|t ignlfican/ areat hbtoic and cahural retoaruer agicultare and sigtqlfrcantmineral and-foril de?0ifi. and?roaided demand existu, water-related retreatioru deaelopment b to be increased and ici urcsthal/ haue a htgherPioitt than aUt non-coastal de?endent utet inc/ading non-water-related rerealion aset. In addition, water-de?endent rereation urcs shall haue a higher?ioiU ouer water-enhanced recrealion we. Detemtining a?ioitJt among coastaldePendent uss will reqaire a rate b:t carc anabit.

The existing ptomeaadl provides water-dependent recreation opportunities to local and Countyresidents and is in full compliance with this Policy. The proposed repair activities are requfued toptovide a long-term solution to the previous bulkhead collapse and allow the Village to re-open thesouthern potion of the promenade vrhich is cwrently closed to the public due to unsafe .orrditioos.

A detailed project descdption with supporting documentation has been included in Appendix A- TidatlVetlands & Protection of lVaterc Permit

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

NATIONWIDE PERMIT 3

for the

Restoration of the Byram River Bulkhead

Village of Port Chester Westchester County, New York

Our File No. 15-192

Prepared for:

Village of Port Chester

Prepared by:

t-

~J ~

Boswell ENGINEERING

South Hackensack, New Jersey

ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS

April2018


TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. JOINT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FORM

II. SUPPLEMENT TO ENGINEERING FORM 4345 (NANY FORM-201)

III. ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

APPENDICES:

APPENDIX A:

APPENDIXB:

APPENDIXC:

DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE

PROJECT SUMMARY

SITE DESCRIPTION

APPENDIX D: PREVIOUS WORI<

APPENDIX E: PROPER1Y OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET

APPENDIXF:

APPENDIXG:

APPENDIXH:

APPENDIX I:

APPENDIX]:

APPENDIXK:

APPENDIXL:

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

PROJECT MAPS (See Figures on Next Page)

GENERAL CONDITIONS

NATURAL HERITAGE DATABASE RESULTS

PHASE lA ARCHEOLOGICAL & HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESS:MENT

SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (SEAF)

DESIGN PLANS & DETAILS

BOSWELL ENGINEERING


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FIGURES:

A. U.S.G.S. Quadrangle Map

B. Tax Assessment Map

C. NYSDEC National Wetland Inventory Map

D. SSURGO Soil Survey Map

E. Aerial View Map

F. FEMA Flood Mapping (Effective & Proposed FIRM Panels)

G. Google Street View Maps

BOSWELL ENGINEERING


..... Recetved

APR 3 0 !018 'dr::>Jv::-4 w Departmental

lfE Environmental Conservation

Office of General Services

Department of State ?~~arwnMrA; & QeveloDme USArmyCorps

of Engineers •

JOINT APPLICATION FORM For Permits for activities activities affecting streams, waterways, waterbodies, wetlands, coastal areas, sources of water, and endangered and threatened species.

You must separately apply for and obtain Permits from each involved agency before starting work. Please read all instructions.

1. Applications To: >NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 0 Check here to confirm you sent this form to NYSDEC.

Check all permits that apply: 0Dams and Impound- 0 Tidal Wetlands D Water Withdrawal 0 Stream Disturbance ment Structures D Wild, Scenic and 0 Long Island Well 0 Excavation and Fill in 0401 Water Quality Recreational Rivers

0 Incidental Take of Navigable Waters Certification

0 Coastal Erosion Endangered I 0 Docks, Moorings or D Freshwater Wetlands Management Threatened Species

Platforms

>US Army Corps of Engineers 0 Check here to confirm you sent this form to USAGE.

Check all permits that apply: 0 Section 404 Clean Water Act D Section 1 0 Rivers and Harbors Act

Is the project Federally funded? ['Yes Ill No

If yes, name of Federal Agency: I General Permit Type(s), if known: I Nationwide Permit No. 3 I I Preconstruction Notification : ["I Yes fll No

>NYS Office of General Services 0 Check here to confirm you sent this form to NYSOGS.

Check all permits that apply: D State Owned Lands Under Water

0 Utility Easement (pipelines, conduits, cables, etc.) D Docks, Moorings or Platforms

>NYS Department of State 0 Check here to confirm you sent this form to NYSDOS.

Check if this applies: [{] Coastal Consistency Concurrence

I Village of Port Chester 2. Name of Applicant licant is NOT an individual

I I

Telephone I {914) 939-2200 Email Ll C:....:S:....:t.::..ee:....:r.::..s@'==P-='"o'-'rt-=-C.:..:.he.::...:s::..::.te:..:.r:....:N....:.Y:....:.c::::o:::m:--_________ ___,l Applicant Must be (check all that apply): [Z] Owner D Operator D Lessee

Mailing Address

II Post Office I City

Telephone

I For Agencv Use Only j Agency Application Number:

JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08/16 Page 1 of 4


JOINT APPLICATION FoRM- Continued. Submit this completed page as part of your Application.

Mailing Address Post Office I Cit State~

~~ 1330 Phillips Avenue South Hackensack

Telephone I (201) 615-8082 Email [frossi@boswell~~.9J!leering.com

Section I Block I Lot Number:

l_r. T.~Y"'~ _ I" ymage ______ C Ci!Y----, ~-----l ~tream/Waterbody Name Port Chester ~ (Westchester Ll 8---'y'--ra~m---:R_iv_e_r ___________ __, Project Location Coordinates: Enter Latitude and Lon~ftude fn degrees, minutes, secorcnd=s"-: ----.

Latitude:l4o lo ls9 I• Iss j" Longitude:l-73 lo 139 I• Iss I" 6. Project Description: Provide the following Information about your project. Continue each response and provide any additional information on other pages. Attach plans on separate pages.

a. Purpose of the proposed prolect: The purpose of the project is to repair the collapsed bulkhead and associated walkway and install an elevated pedestrian bridge.

b. Description of current site conditions: The site consists of a waterfront public open space and walkway adjacent to an existing Costco retail store and parking lot.

c. Proposed site chanqes: The project proposes to replace the existing bulkhead in-kind and construct a new pedestrian bridge.

d. Type of structures and fill materials to be instal[ed, and quantity of materials to be used (e.g., square feet of coverage cubic yards of fill material structures below ordinary/mean high water etc.):

The only fill material associated with the bulkhead instalfation consists of the replacement of previously existing armoring and wall matli)rials which were washed out during Hurricane Sandy.

e. Area of excavation or dredaina, volume of material to be removed location of dredged material placement: N/A

f. Is tree cutting or clearing proposed? r Yes If Yes, explain below. 17 No Timing of the proposed cutting or clearing (month/year): I

~----------~============~ Number of trees to be cut: I I Acreage of trees to be creared:

JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08/16 Page 2 of4

I I

JOINT APPLICATION FoRM -Continued. Submit this completed page as part of your Application.

I g. Work methods and type of equipment to be used: Barge, excavators, backhoes, dump trucks, track loaders, pile drivers and manual labor

I h. Describe the planned sequence of activities:

1- Remove collapsed bulkhead and provide temporary support as necessary. 2- Drive new steel sheeting and construct block retaining walls. 3- Improve existing walkWay, construct second tier block retaining walls and install pedestrian bridge 4- lnstaU chain link fence/landscaping and final restoration I

i. Pollution control methods and other actions proposed to mitigate environmental impacts: Sill curtain and cofferdams will be utilized to isolate the active work area from the Byram River. I

I j. Erosion and silt control methods that will be used to prevent water quality Impacts:

Silt curtain, stabilized construction access, inlet filters and silt fence will be utilized to prevent the transport of sediment downstream. I

k. Alternatives considered to avoid regulated areas. If no feasible alternatives exist, explain how the project will minimize impacts:

The project Involves an in-klnd replacement of a public waterfront resource and cannot avoid regulated areas due to its I proximity to the Byram River.

I. Proposed use: 0 Private [Z]Public 0 Commercial I

m. Proposed Start Date: 1511/2017 I Estimated Completion Date: 112131/2017 I n. Has work begun on project? Dves If Yes, explain below. IZINo I

I o. Will project occupy Federal State or Municipal Land? Dves If Yes, explain below. 1?.1 No

I l~~st on;: ~revious DEC, USACE, OGS or DOS Permit/ Ae~llcallon n"mbe,. for actMties at this location:

I

I I

q. Will this project require additional Federal, State, or Local authorizations, including zoning changes?

I Dves If Yes, list below. 10 No

I I JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08/16 Page3 of4

I


JOINT APPLICATION FORM- Continued. Submit this completed page as part of your Application.

7. Signatures. Applicant and Owner (If different) must sign the application. Append additional pages of this Signature section if there are multiple Applicants, Owners or ContacUAgents.

I hereby affirm that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Permission to Inspect - I hereby consent to Agency inspection of the project site and adjacent property areas. Agency staff may enter the property without notice between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm, Monday- Friday. Inspection may occur without the owner, applicant or agent present. If the property is posted with "keep out" signs or fenced with an unlocked gate, Agency staff may still enter the property. Agency staff may take measurements, analyze site physical characteristics, take soil and vegetation samples, sketch and photograph the site. I understand that failure to give this consent may result in denial of the permit(s) sought by this application.

False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the NYS Penal Law. Further, the applicant accepts full responsibility for all damage, direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whomever suffered, arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits, actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from said project. In addition, Federal Law, 18 U.S.C., Section 1001 provides for a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both where an applicant knowingly and willingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up a material fact; or knowingly makes or uses a false, fictitious or fraudulent statement.

Signature of A~[:!licant Date

I ~----··--·······---~:.:--.---···-·-··--·---·-· · ·

I I t3--. lc. /12 --=~ c..:::==_ _ _

Applicant Must be (check all that apply): 0 Owner Ooperator 0Lessee / I

Printed Name Title

I Christopher D. Steers I I Village Manager

Signature of Owner (if different than Applicant) Date

I I I Printed Name Title

I I Signatur~tact I .A./ant Date

I L-//~ I I J-j ?;:;/;7 Print\;( Name - Title

I Fr{nk J:_5oss( I Boswell Engineering I I Project Manager

For Agency Use Only . . • DETERMINATION OF.NO PERMIT REQUIREO ·· •· . ..---~------~~----~~--·

Agency Application Number '------,---'--------,---~---,--' '---,-....,.--;-;;-----:7-~,-----=--:-:----:---:--:-----:~:-:--:-:-::---'-.l (Agency Name) ha~ determined that No Penmit Is

. required from ~his Agency for the project describe~ :in this application: · ·

Agency Representative: ·Printed :I· ::

Name .· ·. ,, ' Title I · · I Date 1:=. ================~~ · Signature ·

JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08/16 Page 4 of4

I

I

I

I

I

I


DREDGING- UPLAND DISPOSAL

11. Submit specific locations and photographs, color if possible, of the proposed site(s) for the disposition of dredged material. IdentifY all photographs as indicated in box 6. Non-applicable (see below)

12. Describe the present land use of the disposal site(s).

A disposal site will be determined based on post-excavation sampling.

13. Indicate physical nature of dredged material (i.e., sand, silt, clay, etc). Give percentages of the various fractions, if available.

Native sand, gravel silt and rock (gneiss I quartzite) with shell fragmentation.

14. For maintenance dredging, DA pennits are generally issued for a 10 year period. Indicate the number of times dredging is anticipated over a 10 year period and the total capacity (cubic yards) ofthe proposed disposal site(s) which will be used to accommodate the dredge material.

The nature of the proposed dredging is associated with the reconstruction of a failed bulkhead section and is not considered a maintenance dredging. Periodic dredging will not be required.

15. Describe method of dredged material containment (i.e., embankment, bulkhead, etc.)

The dredged material will be placed within a stockpile area as indicated on the construction plans.

DREDGING- OPEN WATER DISPOSAL

16. For maintenance dredging, DA permits are generally issued for a 10 year period. Indicate the number of times dredging is anticipated over a 10 year period. Non-applicable.

17. Submit required testing data (testing criteria will be furnished upon request). Non-applicable.

18. Discuss alternatives to open water disposal of dredged material and why they were rejected. Non-applicable.

MOORING FACILITIES

19. Number of water craft using the present marina facility. Are pumpout facilities available? Non-applicable.

20. Number and type of water craft which will utilize the proposed marina or docking facility. Will pumpout facilities be provided for? Non-a_ppllcable.

LANDFILL

21. Indicate type of structures to be built on the proposed fill. Non-applicable.

22. Type of fill to be used (i.e., sand, stone, rubble, earth, etc.) Non-applicable.

23. Method of fill placement.

Non-applicable.

24. Describe any proposed methods for controlling turbidity during filling operation.

Non~applicable.

NANY FORM~201


SUPPLEMENT TO ENG FORM-4345 Complete and submit, along with materials requested below and executed ENG Form-4345, "Application for aDA permit". If necessary, continue item on an Additional sheet. Identify entry by item number.

GENERAL 1. Period of time required to complete the proposed work. Both actual work time and

duration of the project are required (i.e., three weeks of work time over a two-month period).

8 to 10 months

2. Information characteristic of neighborhood (i.e., high, medium, or low density; residential, commercial, or industrial).

High Density- Commercial, Business District

3. Types of adjacent marine structure and approximate distance from the project site.

Ebb Tide Boat Rentals, Inc- 135':!: east Municipal Boat Slips- Northern project terminus

4. Distance of noise sensitive areas (i.e., schools, hospitals, etc).

Other than the adjacent Costco, restaurants and local businesses there are no noise sensitive areas within the immediate vicinity.

5. Types of construction equipment to be used during construction and number of each type (i.e., bulldozers, trucks, cranes, etc).

One (1) barge, one (1) back hoe, one (1) bucket loader and several dump trucks in conjunction with manual labor.

6. Submit representative photographs, color if possible, of the project area. Identify pictures (i.e., view from north, east, etc., time and date taken). Outline the location of the proposed work on the photograph. See Attached Appendix F

7. Indicate on your project plans and on photographs of the site(s) the location of any wetlands vegetation (such as cordgrass, reedgrass and cattails) in the construction area. Identify photographs as indicated in box 6. No wetlands present on-site.

8. Indicate the location of any know historical or archaeological site(s) within the project limits.

See Appendix J- There are no known historical or archaeological site(s) within the project limits

9. Submit copy of any completed environmental studies or reports on the proposed project.

Copies of reports and data requests are attached herewith.

10. Discuss alternatives to the proposed project which were investigated including alternative locations, disposal areas, construction techniques etc. and why they were rejected.

See Attached Appendix B

NANY FORM-201 FEB78


ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

This is intended to supplement ENG Form 4345, Application for Department of the Army Permit, or the Joint Application for Permit used in the State of New York. Please provide complete answers to all questions below which are relevant to your project. Any answers may be continued on separate sheet(s) of paper to be attached to this form.

PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

The purpose of this form is to provide the Corps of Engineers with basic information regarding your project. This information will be used to facilitate evaluation of your permit application and for public dissemination as required by regulation. Failure to provide complete information may result in your application being declared incomplete for processing, thereby delaying processing of your application.

GENERAL--APPLICABLE TO ALL PROJECTS

1. Explain the need for, and purpose of, the proposed work.

The project involves the repair of an existing bulkhead that was damaged during Superstorm Sandy. (A detailed description of the project purpose and need can be found in Appendix B).

2. Provide the names and addresses of property owners adjacent to your work site (if not shown on the application form or project drawings).

I See Appendix E.

(Please note that depending upon the nature and extent of your project, you may be requested to provide the names and addresses of additional property owners proximate to your project site to ensure proper coordination.)

3. Photographs of the project site should be submitted. For projects in tidal areas, photographs of the waterway vicinity should be taken at low tide. Using a separate copy of your plan view, indicate the location and direction of each photograph as well as the date and time at which the photograph was taken. Provide a sufficient number of photographs so as to provide a clear understanding of conditions on and proximate to your project site.

I See Appendix F.

4. Provide a copy of any environmental impact statement or any other environmental report which was prepared for your project.

I See Appendix K.


5. Provide a thorough discussion of alternatives to your proposal. This discussion should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the "no action" alternative and alternative(s) resulting in less disturbance to waters of the United States. For filling projects in waters of the United States, including wetlands, your alternatives discussion should demonstrate that there are no practicable alternatives to your proposed filling and that your project meets with current mitigation policy (i.e. avoidance, minimization and compensation).

I See Appendix B.

DREDGING PROJECTS

Answer the following if your project involves dredging.

1. Indicate the estimated volume of material to be dredged and the depth (below mean low water) to which dredging would occur. Would there be overdepth dredging?

I Non-applicable.

2. You can apply for a ten-year permit for maintenance dredging. If you wish to apply for a ten-year permit, please provide the number of additional dredging events during the ten-year life of the permit and the amount of material to be removed during future events.

I Non-applicable.

3. Indicate on your drawings the dewatering area (if applicable) and disposal site for the dredged material (except landfill sites). Submit a sufficient number of photographs of the dewatering and disposal sites as applicable so as to provide a clear indication of existing conditions. For ten-year maintenance dredging permits, indicate the dewatering/disposal sites for future dredging events, if known.

I Non-applicable.

4. Describe the method of dredging (i.e. clamshell, dragline, etc.) and the expected duration of dredging.

I Non-applicable.

5. Indicate the physical nature of the material to be dredged (i.e. sand, silt, clay, etc.) and provide estimated percentages of the various constituents if available. For beach nourishment projects, grain size analysis data is required.

Non-applicable.


6. Describe the method of dredged material containment (i.e. hay bales, embankment, bulkhead, etc.) and whether return flow from the dewatering/disposal site would reenter any waterway. Also indicate if there would be any barge overflow.

Non-applicable.

MOORING FACILITIES

Answer the following if your project includes the construction or rehabilitation of recreational mooring facilities.

1. It is generally recommended that any fixed piers and walk ramps be limited to four feet in width, and that floats be limited to eight feet in width and rest at least two feet above the waterway bottom at mean low water. Terminal floats at private, noncommercial facilities should be limited to 20 feet in length. If you do not believe your proposal can meet with these recommendations, please provide the reason(s).

I Non-applicable.

2. Using your plan view, show to scale the location(s), position(s) and size(s) (including length, beam and draft) ofvessel(s) to be moored at the proposed facility, including those of transient vessel(s) if known. I Non-applicable.

3. For commercial mooring sites such as marinas, indicate the capacity of the facility and indicate on the plan view the location(s) of any proposed fueling and/or sewage pump out facilities. If pump out facilities are not planned, please discuss the rationale below and indicate the distance to the nearest available pump out station.

I Non·applicable.

4. Indicate on your plan view the distance to adjacent marine structures, if any are proximate and show the locations and dimensions of such structures.

Non-applicable.


the mooring facility may be subject to wave action from wakes of passing vessels, whose operations would not be required to be modified. Issuance of a permit would not relieve you of ensuring the integrity of the authorized structure(s) and the United States would not be held responsible for damages to the structure(s) and vessel(s) moored thereto from wakes from passing vessels.

Non-applicable.

BULKHEADINGIBANK STABILIZATION/FILLING ACTIVITIES

Answer the following if your project includes construction of bulkheading (also retaining walls and seawalls) with backfill, filling of waters/wetlands, or any other bank stabilization fills such as riprap, revetments, gabions, etc.

1. Indicate the total volume of fill (including backfill behind a structure such as a bulkhead) as well as the volume of fill to be placed into waters of the United States. The amount of fill in waters of the United States can be determined by calculating the amount of fill to be placed below the plane of spring high tide in tidal areas and below ordinary high water in non-tidal areas.

All proposed fill will be placed behind the existing face of the sheet-pile bulkhead. Fill proposed below the MHW includes 9,100 CY of medium stone, 550 CY of granular fill, 300 CY of crushed stone and 750 CY of structural fill.

2. Indicate the source(s) and type(s) of fill material.

Natural crushed stone and rip rap from locally sourced quarry.

3. Indicate the method of fill placement (i.e. by hand, bulldozer, crane, etc.). Would any temporary fills be required in waterways or wetlands to provide access for construction equipment? If so, please indicate the area of such waters and/or wetlands to be filled, and show on the plan and sectional views.

Stone will be placed with backhoe or barge supported crane. No fills will be required within the Byram River to provide construction access.

The foregoing requests basic information on the most common types of projects requiring Department of the Army permits. It is intended to obviate or reduce the need for requesting additional information; however, additional information may be requested above and beyond what is requested in this form.

Please feel free to add any additional information regarding your project which you believe may facilitate our review.

I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX A

I DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE

I I I I I I I I I I


DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE

From 1-95 (New York)

Continue North on the New England Tluuway (Interstate 95). Take Exit 22 for Midland Avenue toward Port Chester. Head North on 72/Midland Avenue and continue straight onto Waterfront Place. Turn Right onto Westchester Avenue and drive to the edge of the Byram River.

From 1-287 (New York)

Continue East on the Interstate 287. Take Exit 11 for US-1 towards Port Chester. Tum Right onto US-1 (Boston Post Road) and continue North. Turn Left onto S Main Street and continue straight. Turn Right onto Westchester Avenue and drive to the edge of the Byram River.

From 1-95 (Connecticut)

Continue South on the Connecticut Turnpike (Interstate 95). Take Exit 2 onto Frontage Road. Head South and take a Right onto Delavan Avenue. Continue straight onto Mill Street and cross the bridge into New York. Take the first Left onto Abendroth Avenue and continue South. Turn Left onto Westchester Avenue and drive to the edge of the Byram River.

From US-1 (Connecticut)

Continue South on US-1 towards New York. Cross the bridge into New York and take a slight left onto Putnam Avenue. Turn Right onto North Main Street and continue South. Turn Left onto Mill Street and then take the first Right onto Abendroth Avenue. Turn Left onto Westchester Avenue and drive to the edge of d1e Byram River.

BOSWELL ENGINEERING

I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX 8

I PROJECT SUMMARY

I I I I I I I I I I


Project Summary

The Village of Port Chester is applying to the Army Corps. of Engineering (ACOE) for a Nationwide Permit

No. 3 associated with the repair of a collapsed bulkhead (approximately 1,600 I. f.) along the Byram River in the Village of Pmt Chester, Westchester County, NY. The collapse occurred along a public walkway and

pavilion area directly adjacent to the western bank of the Byram River. The public walkway is owned by the

County of Westchester and provides local and County residents with direct access to waterfront view of the Byram River and marina.

The bulkhead originally collapsed in 2009 and is in danger of complete structural failure. Several emergency

repairs were made to prevent further damage to the structure and minimize erosion. The repairs were designed

as a temporary solution. The existing walkway south of the cove is still not open to the public and has adversely

affected the Village's small businesses due to limited accessibility along this portion of the waterfront. The

proposed repair represents a comprehensive solution to the damaged bulkhead structure revitalizing the area to its former state and providing residents with a unique public open space adjacent to the Byram River.

The major project components are described in detail below:

Cast-in-Place Concrete Retaining Wall (Station 0+00 to Station 6+75)

The southern portion of the repair involves the construction of a cast-in-place concrete retaining wall which

will act as the new bulkhead while supporting a cantilevered steel beam deck. The deck will consist of a timber "boardwalk" walking surface with a decorative railing for fall protection. The design includes a proposed rip rap revetment located waterward of the concrete retaining wall to protect the wall from wave action and prevent the concrete footings from scour. The waterward limit of the rip rap revetment will terminate at the existing bulkhead (to be removed) to minimize additional disturbances to the Byram River. The use of a cantilevered deck allows the watercourse to extend further landward along the western bank and occupy space

below the walking surface that was previously filled. (2,327 CY)

G 16

12

8

4

0

-4

-8

-12

-16

-20

LANDSCAPED AREA

UARDRAI~~ ........... \

111\ J;" .a~? II

J I

--NEW-€\:! 'n I "~

-40 - 20

RAIUNG--, 01 00 + l:.! ·l 100 YEAR FlOOD: 12.00

TW:9.8,2 ' Ex stint?: Bul~ bead

l..----" -c pN,:RElE __..

HW; ... In t< . l f'ININ(.; WAIJ..

......... I

.......... i ,.--RIPR P REvt:TME~ T 'Jj MLW:-3 99

! ""'-. ..-RES bRED GRADE I I -- -z 11.1 \ ----

..JI ::J rAI:> IfNI.> CI:.U I

~I Cl

~ 11.1

~I a:: al Cl..

0 20 40


Project Summary

Steel Sheet-pile Bulkhead (Station 6+75 to Station 16+00)

The second method of repair involves the driving of new sheeting immediately waterward ofthe existing sheet

pile bulkhead to reinforce the water' s edge and prevent potential collapse. The proposed sheet pile wall will

contain a concrete cap and decorative railing with a paver block walking surface. The proposed improvements

are considered an in-kind repair of existing, previously authorized structures. The work will be located within the 18" of the existing bulkhead limit and no new structures are being proposed.

RETAINING -GUARDRAILuALL-KEYSTONE 1\ 07+00 NEW

3\

CURB RAIUNG---, 16

I 100 YEAR kooD:12.00 El. : 1.3.B2\_ Il l . . ~~ 'VEW N I fl.,_ lJ/ PAVE I

/ I l:jB : 9.52! \. :rw:ln." I I 8 ~~~/ I - .I!.XIStlD!! tsutkbead!

I .-1---- ' ! ANC HOR~ : lb I

I I

4 !:!W:-3:-20 ............ ....,.;,- I I

0 --- : ! -~ i I

-4 1-r"" I I M W:-3•99 I .... I : 1--L SltEL SHEE11NG I -8 I i r - i- BULKHEAD WALL

I I I - I ~~- --

' ... 1\ ---- 12 z

-'I I\. - -::II EXI5liNG -Bm-JdN<" -- -~..,-- 0

-16 ~jllP EL 15.0"' I

- 20 I !II a: I I a;1 .... I a::

-40 -20 0 20 40

Pre-fabricated Pedestrian Truss Bridge

The project also includes the installation of a prefabricated steel pedestrian truss bridge to provide access between two (2) existing pavilion areas. The purpose of the bridge is to enhance connectivity and circulation

through the waterfront area while offering scenic views of the Byram River. The bridge will span the existing

inlet with a low chord elevation of 6.5 (NA VD 1988) which is 3.3 feet above MHW. The width of the bridge

(10' walkway I 12' - 7" total width) was designed to match the existing walkway approaches on either end of the structure.

rA PROPOSED PREFABRICATED

BRIDGE WEST ELEVAllON N.T.S.


Project Summary

Project Disturbances

The area/volume disturbances associated with the proposed bulkhead repair are as follows:

~,,":~~~~--."'~-~-~!!~:U~~iii~fli'_- _- ~fi~ ~~- ~, -~~=t!~~~~f:?~ 7i!~lf~i4~i~tit}' ---:J1~@l!iY!!~j)3cifi!-1Y!fl:,)}fj Unclassified Excavation and Disposal CY 19,100 9,100

Stone Filling (Medium) CY 1,100 1,033

Select Granular Fill CY 600 550

Concrete for Structures (Retaining Wall) CY 1,100 650

Crushed Stone CY 1,048 300

Select Structural Fill CY 1,780 750

Backfill- Restored Material CY 1,990 1,990

The area of proposed fill below the MHW line is currently located behind the existing waterward face of the sheet-pile bulkhead. The fills are necessary to replace the damaged bulkhead and construct a cantilevered section of the walkway, which will remove approximately 2,23 7 CY of material below the MHW within the Byram River. The project does not propose any new fills within waters of the United States.

The project will create no additional permanent disturbances to the Byram River waterward of the existing bulkhead from Station 0+00 to Station6+75. The remainder of the repair (Station 6+75 to 16+00) involves

the driving of sheeting at the waterward face of the existing bulkhead to minimize disturbances to the regulated watercourse.

Best Management Practices

The bid documents will require the use of cofferdams, silt curtains and construction netting to avoid discharge of debris within the state and federally regulated Byram River. Active work areas requiring the application of shotcrete or mortar below the mean high water line will be dewatered utilizing a Porta Dam as detailed below.

DEWATERED WORK AREA IMPERVIOUS FABRIC

BED SEALING APRON


Project Summary

The use of wet cement or pouring of concrete will be scheduled during low tide and protected with temporary controls to avoid contact with open waters. Since this area is tidally influenced and experiences varying degrees of storm surge activity on a regular basis, the temporary increase in noise and possibly

turbidity within the limit of work will have no adverse impacts to existing aquatic biota within the vicinity. The use of concrete below the mean high water mark will be required from Station 0+00 to 6+75 for the installation of the above referenced cast-in-place retaining wall.

I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX C

I SITE DESCRIPTION

I I I I I I I I I I


Site Description

The site is located on Block 310001, Lot 42 along the western bank of the Byram River. This portion of the

Byram River delineates the New York/Connecticut state boundary between the Village of Port Chester and

Town of Greenwich. The site can be accessed from Abendroth and Westchester Avenues near an existing Loews Theatres, Costo Wholesale and other retail establishments and local business. The proposed project is situated on Block 310001, Lot 42 with the specific areas of rehabilitation identified on the design drawings

from Station 0+00 to 16+00. The waterfront walkway and pavilion area are located directly adjacent to the

Costco parking lot and an existing Sunoco gas station. The subject property is depicted on the

Glenville/Mamaroneck, New York Quadrangle Map (USGS) and the State Plane Coordinates for the project limits are as follows:

Northern Project Limit: Nmthing: 790,538 Easting: 723,710- NAVD 1983 (US Feet)

Southern Project Limit: Northing: 789,640 Easting: 724,049- NA VD 1983 (US Feet)

The Byram River is a tidally influenced watercourse that meets the confluence with Long Is land Sound approximately 0.85± miles from the project site. The river is approximately 20 miles in length and has a

watershed area of29 square miles. The depth and frequency of flooding adjacent to this Federally regulated

watercourse has historically increased due to the reduction of flood storage within the watershed as a result of development (impervious coverage). The lower reach of the river is polluted with non-point sources such

as nutrients, sediment, metals, pesticides, tloatables and pathogens. Additionally, the NYDEC Natural Heritage Program has no records of any rare or State listed aquatic flora or fauna within the affected portion of the river.

I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX D

I PREVIOUS WORK

I I I I I I I I I I


Previous Work

The original bulkhead was rebuilt with a modern sheet-pile bulkhead in 1998. The structure was damaged as a result of Hurricane Sandy and collapsed in two (2) areas. Several emergency repairs have been performed to arrest further damage and prevent continuous bank erosion. The bulkhead is currently in need of replacement.


APPENDIX E

PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET


Properties within 300ft (New York)

Municipality Address KEY ID

Port Chester Abendroth Ave 142.31-1-39.1

Port Chester 30-32 Martin PI 142.39-1-51

Port Chester 21 Martin PI 142.39-1-59

Port Chester 28 Adee St 142.31-1-7

Port Chester Martin PI 142.39-1-61.1

Port Chester 37 Westchester Ave 142.31-1-40.1

Port Chester Waterfront PI/Westchester Ave 142.31-1-43.1

Port Chester Abendroth Ave 142.31-1-39

Port Chester Martin PI 142.39-1-53

Port Chester 61 Westchester Ave 142.31-1-3

Port Chester 17 N Main St 142.31-1-18







Port Chester Westchester Ave 142.31-1-41



Port Chester 37-39 N Main St 142.31-1-13



Port Chester 13 1/2 N Main St 142.31-1-20











Properties within 300ft (Connecticut)

Municipality Location Greenwich SOUTH WATER STREET Greenwich SOUTH WATER STREET Greenwich SOUTH WATER STREET Greenwich SOUTH WATER STREET Greenwich SOUTH WATER STREET Greenwich

Greenwich SOUTH WATER STREET

Greenwich SOUTH WATER STREET Greenwich SOUTH WATER STREET



Greenwich SOUTH WATER STREET Greenwich SOUTH WATER STREET

MBL PIN 04-2124/S 481616-896238

04-1328/S 481616-899224

04-1948/S 481616-902204

04-1949/S 481616-903192

04-1653/S 481616-903177

C0159 481608-905160.000

04-1392/S 481608-906145

04-1114/S 481608-921142 04-1893/S 481608-920137

04-1561/S 481608-905126

04-2117/S 481608-918127

04-1559/S 481608-917123

04-2014/S 481608-916118

I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX F

I SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

I I I I I I I I I I


CLIENT NAME:

Villa e of Port Chester

Description: Northwestern view of a damaged section of the bulkhead.

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

PROJECT NAME: Restoration of the B ram River Bulkhead

-1-


CLIENT NAME:


Description: Northwestern view along the damaged bulkhead.

Description: Northwestern view of a destroyed section of bulkhead.

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

PROJECT NAME:

Restoration of the B ram River Bulkhead

-2-


I BOSWELL ENGINEERING 8 ENGINEERS o PLANNERS o SURVEYORS o SCIENTISTS

CLIENT NAME:


Description: Northwestern view of the bulkhead. Note: The fenced off access point for a pier.

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

PROJECT NAME: Restoration of the 8 ram River Bulkhead

-3-


I BOSWELL ENGINEERING e ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS

CLIENT NAME: Villa e of Port Chester

Description: Northwestern view of the northern limit of the bulkhead.

Description: Southwestern view of the collapsed bulkhead.

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS


-4-


I BoswELL ENGINEERING e ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS

CLIENT NAME: Villa e of Port Chester

Description: Northwestern view of the closed waterfront walkway.

Description: Western view along the waterfront walkway.

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS


-5-


I BoswELL ENGINEERING 8 ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

CLIENT NAME: SITE LOCATION: PROJECT NAME: Villa e of Port Chester Port Chester, New York Restoration of the B ram River Bulkhead

-6-

I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I

Village of Port Chester

.. ~.?.~-~:~!:.~~~~~=~~~~:,. 330 Phlllps Avenue South H.achnuck, NJ 07606

Tel: 201-U1..0770 . Fu:: Z01-641-17!H


APPENDIX G

PROJECT MAPS (See List of Figures)


SOURCE: U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP

N 789,943 E 724,001

I

in. (irllUY fJF:Iodc .

( ;

RESTORATION OF THE BYRAM RIVER BULKHEAD

VILLAGE OF PORT CHESTER

WESTCHESTER COUNTY NEW JERSEY

BY: FJR

BOSWELL ENGINEERING

DATE: JAN2017

N.J. 07606

NO. 15-192

GS

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

(i) ) /\-~-- -::-=-:: - -.· - ··· ··· - ··•"""- ''' - ''' ........ _ ., __

SOURCE: PORT CHESTER TAX MAPS

::i (,)

I ,. I

:I; w w cr 0

\

.,

\

' \

l

' \ '

\ \

\

\

I i

\

\ .... \

\ I .I

\

\ \

ffi \\ ~ IX.

RESTORATION OF THE BYRAM RIVER BULKHEAD VILLAGE OF PORT CHESTER


BOSWELL ENGINEERING 330 PHILLIPS AVE., SOUTH HACKENSACK, N.J. 07606

DR. BY: JMW SCALE: NTS JOB NO. 15-192 CKD. BY: FJR DATE: JAN 2017 TAX


SOURCE:

NYDEC NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY

N 789,943 E 724,001



ESTCHESTER COUNTY NEW JERSEY


DR. BY: JMW

CKD.BY: FJR

SCALE: I" = 150'

DATE: JAN 2017

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SOURCE:

SSURGO WESTCHESTER COUNTY SOIL

I SURVEY

N 789,943

I E 724,001

I

W: Water



STCHESTER COUNTY NEW JERSEY

BOSWELL ENGINEERING 330 PHILLIPS AVE. SOUTH HACKENSACK, N.J. 07606

BY: JMW SCALE: 1" = 150' DATE: JAN 2017


SOURCE: 2010 PTCTOMETRY ORTHOPHOTOGRAPHY

N 789,943 E 724,001

RESTORATION OF THE BYRAM RlVER BULKHEAD VILLAGE OF PORT CHESTER


BOSWELL ENGINEERING 330 PHILLIPS AVE. SOUTH HACKENSACK, N.J. 07606

BY: FJR AERIAL


SOURCE:

WESTCHESTER COUNTY FEMA FLOOD DATALAYER

N 789,943 E 724,001




BOSWELL ENGINEERING 330 PHILLIPS AVE. , SOUTH HACKENSACK, N.J. 07606

DR. BY: JMW BY: FJR

SCALE: I" = 150' DATE: JAN 2017

JOB NO. 15-192 FEMA

FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION

SO:FlSHHH IUt(DJWLU.OO.IOIIIUli&.\,FUF.MMIIULA'I'IIDT

THE llffOIMATJON DU'IClm ON tHIS IIW' AltO SUri'OITifG DOC\.IIIOilAT10f!At£AUO.IIIIMAIIllllfDI(;Il'AlFOIIMAl'Af

HTTP-j / MSC.FEMA.GOV

I B. WkilottBaufklodEJewallo~(llfE)

Z.,.w~.V,AINI

\'t1UI DFEor 0.pth <1;r,..<.!.AO.MV!.AII == lliPiiJ Rejlllltoi'}'ACOdWI )

UIHtJIAHI:ASut FtOOOIWARO

- 0.2%AIIIniChiK:tAoociHumi, Areas afl'II. AIInuiii ChuccAoodwttllt-.(t depllleu tMn one rootorwllfl dralua~ •u•oflaStllu -lqutrelllilt lJ>I><lli flltllreC .. GitlOri51,.JIIIIIU .. Cll.1nceFloo4HUJi11 ZMot>: AfttwltiiReductdFloodRisllduetGI.evee ~NOie$ 1.,....(

I~ Anafllt.lllllmalfloadHIUrd lm;o. ~· = !'P" -. ArufliU!n:leterrnlnedflotiiiHuard rtoo .. o

CENERAI. I--- CIIannii,C~Inrt,orSto~mSft'ef STRUCJl.llES .,., ___ ltrtt,OiMI,GffloodWIII

~CronS«ttons lldtlll ,. Aaaaa!Onu -..!1:!. WlllllfSurl.C.IIBI!'Ja!IOII{liFE)

(!) ·--- CNSU.Ilrun(t - ··- · Co1Sti1Transect 8uellnt ---· Prunla la5<~1U

-- ~ropaplll~fnture

-.lll -tl&~floiMIEieratinUnetiiFEI

FfA= I=== ~u~~=~uadary

NOTES TO USERS """----·-... -· .. .----.... -~ --....... , ___ .. _,_ ..... _..,.... ...... _ ,.,.,._.,,....,., _ ........ ..rw.w•-·.,._ ., ,_IIT1~11 .. 1l'-!Jf.2121l•*-""'UIA -- t-- .. ..--.... ...-...- .... - ........... -._. .. _ ,__, ____ . ___ ... .. -.. -........... _ ,._.. ..... ... -.... -.. ... ........ _ ... __ ......... __ ... _, __ ... .. .... _ ..... _ ... _ .... ____ ~-- ...... _ ... . ( .... .... - ........ . ---.. ·-·----..... ..,. ........ -........ .. -.. ... ...- .... .. ...... ·--· .. --... --... ... --.,._ ..... _ .... _ .... ___ ...... .. ......... ___ ,,_ ..... _ 1•-·--·--... --------·· ...... --.... ·-~··--loooo _____ • ...,_ .,_., __ .. _, ... so. .. '- ....

.:.....-------·-·----... u , ... _ ---.. - ........ ,., ..

..... , .,_ .... 11_Aef!Ot_a6 ... __ ~ · ·1ool .. --.-~ ...... ~~~?:-::::=.:===:~~~= ......____.___ UTIIItuiMOT.Iende\\'a.,Actloa(UMWA}

SCALE

j l ::::.'::i:,.,,. ~,~,,_t.NUH.i'oottll_oo_ l1 1l • Glla_lliiO_NoM ____ ollliU

N lludl .. 500fccl 1:6.000

1,000 '-~ .. , Mt\t rl

"' PANEL LOCATOR

~ ~ ~ ~ J:.Lo Q)

a- g ~ j ~ "" ::I - U)

.E "C

8 u:: Cij

6 ;;

"' z

NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP

WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK ::::.,, ~e~

PRELIMINARY DECEMBER 8, 2014

W:IISO~NUWBVI

2.2.2.1

N...,IIU!IIBO: 36U9C0293G



!)91f£0:)6l:t9£ 10el'l!IM~'t'W

~~;NOISIIJA

"lOZ 'g ~3Br.l3:>30 Al::IVNI~I13l::ld

= -: :::: ·- «)--~ ""' HJRNrll WNnl'MIY.I I.)

gz~ .a gg£,...

·'if:? )!}lOA MlN 'A..I.NOOJ t~lJ.SiH:)lSj,;:

dlf~<W3l'I'(IJ::ltJ'v'l;I0SNIOOOlJ

WVllr!Olld lJNVIlnSNI OOOlJ lVNOU'iN

_ ..... .. ----...... - ..... - ... --... --.. ........ ... ,... __ ... _ ... _, --- ..... ---~~-- __ _..., ..... ___ ... _ _.. .. , "Moonl ___ .. _.. . .. __ _,,.,._,_,.:a-:JMJ:IOOI'IIll"""

z "' !:!: 0 ::1

!!!. ., 0 0 0. :;-

"'

'ti Ol_ ., ___ ... __

--n··-------~• ---_ _, ___ .. ,._..,...,._, __ •.,.""----<:: OJ ::1

l!C- ··-----......... ---..... -·~ ... "1-'!"""--·-·1 __ ., ______ ..... -----~ ... C"l

1-rj "' _ ... -.:l __ ... ___ .. --...------__ _..,._ ,. ______ ..... -- ... -... -~

-o l:r.1 a

~ ~ "' 3

31VOS S~3Sn 01 S310N

h•~MJnos~!PIPSIJI'I( -- Slllf\1¥'1:1 ,(pntSI011Wn -- "~O

Walfll!liiOIIUIIfl~Kr; -uiaJIQI:a~~<le4a.IPolK--

.... t!Mq~!IG'd · - ·IUJIHeSl)ISUtJl(e}Sto:) ·· - ··

):18SURI1!a)S.OJ-·-·0

~ue~l'=~==:'o,~ ~ HlapCIOUIO'qiQ ·~ •••••••••"-[ D MIU!lll iUS

Ja.olfSUIJCqS.IO'lJ~'puurq!)--""""

{J""<>< ~•raH IWIII:II"ffltuWiapunp> HI\' I m" . "'""' )' •<J<>lp.!m!HPIIOI:I II!IIJIUIW IO"'Y ~~

1(-l WlONUS INIMilOl.,P~IIpooupeoonptyqpnry

~·!iOJ p.I I:.Hpoo(;la:JYf!IJ pi!RUIIV'IU IUOA!PUO:)IJiqllj

N)'!J' 'dW3:f;)SW//..:lllH J.V1Witi~'MJ'JiaNIJliYl!WIY0$'1YJWNOUY1HlWOJOO

~ti06«1SON\'4YWSIIUNO~N~iK1

IIIU'I'ItJI'f.II.III:IIIQt-~lll'fllllUIIJIMJG-JIOoiJISU:B1

NOilVW~O~NI O~lfZVH 0001~

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ZONEAE

FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP IN AREAS

OUTSIDE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY

- -• MAP SCALE 1"

500

- -500'

1000 FEET

360912 360928

360930

MAP NUMBER 36119C0293F

EFFECTIVE DATE

Fttlc:nd F.mtrgt iiCY l\lauagt1n ent Agc:ncy

-

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -MAP SCALE 1"

500

600'

COMMUNITY

HARRISON, TOWN OF PORT CHESTER, VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK, VILLAGE OF RYE, CITY OF

1000 FEET

NUMBER

360912 360928

360930

360931

•"tdual EmtrJttncy Management Agency

-


O' VGII'tiOt•VI I r'\11111

Thrift Store EJ

;/. CD; '' q. Copacaba a Steakhouse

~

EJ f) Valero

Wings

0 .

0 Mars ails

0 Costco Who lesa le

hop

-~

.; .i .·.-,

,-!.':~1Ck .~ ... '

·-,

SOURCE: GOOGLE STREET MAPS

I Cli ~ C .. ..'

~ ~





DR. BY: JMW

CKD. BY: FJR

SCALE: NTS

DATE: JAN 2017

JOB NO. 15-192

MAP(+)


r_ . -~ -

. ~j .• 'Q

li ~.

Rye Brook

,EI

l

.fl ., 0 Playland Par .. ~ :."!! ·-.

SOURCE: GOOGLE STREET MAPS

.. , - .u

' 1~~ /

<-: ;.-

Q._

V '

G o g le





DR. BY: JMW CKD. BY: FJR

SCALE: NTS DATE: JAN 2017

JOB NO. 15-192 MAP(-)

I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX H

I GENERAL CONDITIONS

I I I I I I I I I I


GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. Navigation: The bulkhead repair is situated along the western edge of the Byram River, which meets its confluence with the Long Island Sound approximately 0.85+ miles from the project site. The rehabilitation of the bulkhead structure existing will not impede the channel or result in the loss of navigability to commercial or recreational vessels. The proposed bulkhead will be replaced in the same location as the existing bulkhead as shown on the design drawings.

2. Aquatic Life Movements: The proposed project is a strict repair of an existing bulkhead. All activities will take place within the existing footprint of disturbance and no new development which would pose physical barriers to the movement of fish along finfish migratoty pathways is being proposed. The project will not result in:

- lowered dissolved oxygen levels; - the release of toxic chemicals; - raised ambient water temperature; - impinging or suffocating fish; - silt and sedimentation; or - raised turbidity levels during migration periods.

All of the material proposed to be placed on site is clean and will not impact water quality or violate State Water Quality Standards.

3. Spawning Areas: The project location has not been identified as a spawning area.

4. Migratory Bird Breeding Areas: The project location has not been identified as a breeding area for migratory birds.

5. Shellfish Beds: Our field inspection team did not find the presence of shellfish beds on or near the project area.

6. Suitable Material: All materials used during the repair of the existing bulkhead and pavilion will consist of dean suitable material free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts.

7. Water Supply Intakes: There are no water supply intakes within the vicinity of the project area.

8. Adverse Effects from Impoundments: The project will not create an impoundment of water within the Long Island Sound or the Atlantic Ocean.

9. Management of Water Flows: The pre-construction course, condition, capacity and location of open waters will not be adversely affected as a result of the project.

10. Fills within 100~year Floodplains: The project area is located within tl1e 100-year floodplain of the Byram River as indicated on FEMA panels 36119C0293G and 36119C0356G. The project will not adversely effect flooding upstream or

BOSWELL ENGINEERING


GENERAL CONDITIONS

downstream of the subject property and will increase flood storage within the area of the cantilevered walkway and rip rap embankment.

The proposed waterfront reconstruction will have no effect on the mean low /high water elevations and will not increase flooding. The minor disturbances associated with the seawall restoration activities will also have no effect on the water surface elevation of the Long Island Sound or Atlantic Ocean. Conversely, the proposed design will remove approximately 2,327 cy of fill behind the existing bulkhead in the area of the cantilevered deck section (southern project limit).

11. Equipment: No work is being proposed within wetlands or mud flats. The utilization of a barge, silt curtains and a port-a-dam system to isolate the work areas will minimize disturbances to Water of the United States. Minor disturbances associated with the use of an excavator are anticipated along the proposed rip rap embankment.

12. Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls: Soil Erosion and Sediment Control measures, such as silt curtains, silt fencing, inlet filters, stockpile areas, haybales and temporary cofferdams will be utilized during const1uction to prevent the transport of sediment downstream.

13. Removal of Temporary Fills: The proposed activity does not require temporary fills during construction.

14. Proper Maintenance: The proposed activities are necessru:y to restore tl1e existing bulkhead and protect private/public property. The bulkhead was damaged during Superstorm Sandy and has been in need of repair for several years.

15. Wild and Scenic Rivers: The Byram River is not part of the National Wild and Scenic River System.

16. Tribal Rights: The project will not impair resenred tribal rights in any way.

17. Endangered Species: According to the New York Natural Heritage Program the NYSDEC Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources has no records of rare or state-listed animals or plants, or significant natural communities.

18. Historic Properties: There are no properties within the project area that are listed or are eligible for listing on the National Register for Historic Places. (Appendix K)

19. Designated Critical Resource Waters: The Long Island Sound is not designated as an NOAA-designated marine sanctuary.

20. Mitigation: The project will not require mitigation for the loss of natural resources.

21. Water Quality: The water quality of the Byram River will not be adversely affected. As stated above, soil erosion and sediment control devices (such as temporary

BOSWELL ENGINEERING


GENERAL CONDITIONS

cofferdams, silt curtains, turbidity monitoring, etc.) will be used during the proposed reconstruction to ensure disturbances to the waterway are isolated and sediment is not transported downstream.

22. Coastal Zone Management: A Coastal Zone Management Program "Consistency Certification" has been included in Section IV of this permit application.

23. Regional and Case-by-Case Conditions: There are no additional compliance measures under 33CFR 330.4(e) applicable to the proposed seawall rehabilitation project.

24. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits: The project is not requesting the use of more than one Nationwide Permit. The activity strictly requires authorization under Nationwide Permit 3 for the reconstruction of an existing bulkhead. The footprint of development will remain unchanged

25. Transfer of Nationwide Permit Verifications: The bulkhead is located on property owned and maintained by the Village of Port Chester. There are no plans to sell this property in the near future.

26. Compliance Certification: The Village of Port Chester will provide the Corps with a signed certification detailing tl1e completed work upon finalization of the reconstruction activities.

27. Pre-Construction Notilication: A sample of the Pre-Construction Notification has been included in Section V for your review.

28. Single and Complete Project: The proposed activity is a single and complete project associated with the repair of a damaged bulkhead and constmction of a pedestrian footbridge.

BOSWELL ENGINEERING


APPENDIX I

NATURAL HERITAGE DATABASE RESULTS


NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway, 5th Floor, Albany, New York 12233-4757 Phone: (518) 402-8935 • Fax: (518) 402-8925 Website: www.dec.ny.gov

James Woodward Boswell Engineering 300 Phillips Avenue South Hackensack, NJ 07606

January 18, 2017

Re: Restoration of Byram River Bulkhead, Village of Port Chester

Town/City: Rye. County: Westchester.

Dear James Woodward:

In response to your recent request, we have reviewed the New York Natural Heritage Program database with respect to the above project.

We have no records of rare or state-listed animals or plants, or significant natural communities at your site or in its immediate vicinity.

The absence of data does not necessarily mean that rare or state-listed species, significant natural communities, or other significant habitats do not exist on or adjacent to the proposed site. Rather, our files currently do not contain information that indicates their presence. For most sites, comprehensive field surveys have not been conducted. We cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence or absence of all rare or state-listed species or significant natural communities. Depending on the nature of the project and the conditions at the project site, further information from on-site surveys or other resources may be required to fully assess impacts on biological resources.

This response applies only to known occurrences of rare or state-listed animals and plants, significant natural communities, and other significant habitats maintained in the Natural Heritage database. Your project may require additional review or permits; for information regarding other permits that may be required under state law for regulated areas or activities (e.g., regulated wetlands), please contact the appropriate NYS DEC Regional Office, Division of Environmental Permits, as listed at www.dec.ny.gov/about/39381.html.

1681

Sincerely,

(};~~~-<>-Andrea Chaloux Environmental Review Specialist New York Natural Heritage Program


APPENDIXJ

PHASE 1A ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT


HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES INC.

Phase lA Archaeological and Historic Resources Assessment Repair of the Collapsed Bulkhead Sections along the Byram River

Port Chester, Westchester County, New York


Phase lA Archaeological and Historic Resources Assessment Repair of the Collapsed Bulkhead Sections along the Byram River

Port Chester, Westchester County, New York

Prepared For:

Boswell Engineering 330 Phillips A venue

P.O. Box 3152 South Hackensack, N.J. 07696

Prepared By;

Historical Perspectives, Inc. P.O. Box529

Westport, cr 06881

Authors: Daryn Reyman-Lock, Ph.D.

Julie Abell Horn, M.A., R.P.A. Cece Saunders, M.A., R.P A.

May2016


MANAGEMENT SUMMARY

SHPO Project Review Number (if available):

Involved State and Federal Agencies: New York State Department of State

Phase of Survey: Phase lA Archaeological and Historic Resources Assessment

Location Information Location: Adjacent to 1 Westchester Avenue Minor Civil Division: 10573, Port Chester County: Westchester

Survey Area Length: approximately 860 feet Width: approximately 10 feet Number of Acres Surveyed: approximately 0.2 acres

USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Map: Mamaroneck

Archaeological Survey Overview Number & Interval of Shovel Tests: N/A Number & Size of Units: N/A Width ofPlowed Strips: N/A Surface Survey Transect Interval: N/A

Results of Archaeological Survey Number & name ofprecontact sites identified: None Number & name of historic sites identified: None Number &name of sites recommended for Phase III Avoidance: None

Results of Architectural Survey Number of buildings/structures/cemeteries within project area: None Number of buildings/structures/cemeteries adjacent to project area: One; Costco store Number of previously determined NRHP listed or eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: None Number ofidentified eligible buildingslstructuresfcemeteries/districts: None

Report Authors(s): Daryn Reyman-Lock, M.A., Pb.D., Julie Abell Horn, M.A. R.P.A., and Cece Saunders, M.A., R.P.A., Histortcal Perspectives, Inc,

Date of Report: May 2016


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Boswell Engineering was contracted by the Village of Port Chester to stabilize and repair the modem bulk11ead along the Byram River in the Village of Port Chester, Westchester County, New York. The project site is within Block 310001, Lot 41, a narrow corridor of land which includes a riverside walkway. The project site is adjacent to Block 310001, Lot 42, on Westchester Avenue, containing the existing Costco Wholesale and its associated parking lot (Figure I and 2).

The Applicant proposes to stabilize 860 feet of bulkhead along the Port Chester Byram River Waterfront. The bulkhead has failed in two areas (Figure 3), leading to land collapse (referred to as "Activity Node" by the Applicant and the Village ofPort Chester) and compromising the safety of the waterfront walkway.

As part of the SEQRA environmental review process, Historical Perspectives, Jnc. (HPI) was contracted to conduct a Phase IA Archaeological and Historic Resources Assessment of the project site, which is_0.2 acres in extent. The Archaeological Area of Potential Effect (APE) is limited to the area that will experience direct impacts as part of the proposed project and, for the purposes of this study, the APE is the same as the project area. The Architectural APE is considered to include the proposed development areas within the project site as well as the area substantially contiguous to the project site. According to SEQRA, the term "substantially contiguous" is intended to cover situations where a proposed activity is not directly adjacent to a sensitive resource, but is in close enough proximity that is could potentially have an impact. Generally, this would include resources that could be seen from ·•tong vistas" at ground level, until project development heights are finalized and an official viewscape can be determined. For the purposes of this study, HPI considers one-tenth mile from the project site to be the approximate distance used to comply with this requirement.

From what is known of pre contact period settlement patterns in Westchester County, most habitation and processing sites are found in sheltered, elevated sites close to wetland features, major waterways, and with nearby sources of :fresh water. The project site was originally under the water of the Byram River. The current, modem bulkhead is still in the riverbed, while soil behind the bulkhead consists of imported fill. Hence, there is little precontact petiod archaeological sensitivity.

The project site was completely under water until the 1890s. Landfill was placed in the project site, west of the bulkhead, to create the artificial shoreline of today. During the 201h century the project site was part of the Port Chester waterfront. Creation of the Costco store and parking lot in 2002 necessitated massive changes to the project site vicinity, including construction ofthe riverside walk. The current bulkhead dates to the 1990s. HPI concludes that the project site has no remaining historic period archaeological sensitivity.

There are no architectural resources to be considered for the present project either within the project site boundaries or substantially contiguous to the project site. There is one building adjacent to the project site: Costco. The building was constructed within the last 15 years and has no architectural significance.

Based on the conclusions, above, HPJ recommends that there are no cultural resources concerns for the proposed project and no additional work is required.

ii


TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................. iii

I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. ! II. METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................. ! ill BACKGROUND RESEARCH ........................................................................................... 2

A. CURRENT CONDITIONS ......................................................................................... 2 B. TOPOGRAPHY AND HYDROLOGY ....................................................................... 2 C. SOILS .......................................................................................................................... 2 D. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC SITES AND SURVEYS

WITHIN A ONE MILE RADIUS ............................................................................... ] E. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT SITE .......................................................................... 4 F. SUMMARYOFARCHIVALRESULTS ................................................................... 7 G. ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................ 7

IV. CONCLUSTONS ................................................................................................................. 7 A. ?RECONTACT SENSITIVITY AND DISTURBANCE RECORD ........................... 7 B. HISTORICAL PERIOD SENSlTIVITY AND DISTURBANCE RECORD .............. 7 C. ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................ 8

V. RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................... 8 VI. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 9

FIGURES

PHOTOGRAPHS


l.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

II.

12.

13.

FIGURES

Project site on Mamaroneck, N.Y. 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle (U.S.G.S. 2013).

Project site and photograph locations on aerial photograph.

Proposed project development (Boswell Engineering 2016).

Project site on Web Soil Survey (U.S.D.A. 2016).

Project site on Atlas of New York and Vicinity (Beers 1867).

Project site on Atfas of Westchester County, New York (Bromley 1881).

Project site on Port Chester, New York (Bailey 1882).

Project site on Atlas of Westchester County, New York (Bien 11!93).

Project site on 1925-6 aerial photograph (Westchester County GIS).

Project site on 1947 aerial photograph (Westchester County GIS).

Project site on 1955 photograph (Daily Item, Westchester County Archives).

Project site on 1960 aerial photograph (Westchester County G1S).

Project site on 1986 aerial photograph (Westchester County GIS).

iv


1.

2.

3.

4.

PHOTOGRAPHS (Locations and orientations shown on Figure 2)

View looking northwest from the southern point of the riverside walk.

View looking east from the northern section of the riverside walk.

View looking south from the piers attached to the housing complex on South Water Street, Greenwich, CT.

View looking northeru;t from the parking lot of Greenwich Bay Marina, South Water Street, Greenwich, CT.

S. View looking south from the piers attached to the housing complex on South Water Street

6. View looking northeast from the parking lot of Greenwich Bay Marina, South Water Street, Greenwich, CT.

v


I. INTRODUCTION

Boswell Engineering was contracted by the Village ofPort Chester to stabilize and repair the modem bulkhead along the Byram River in the Village ofPort Chester, Westchester County, New York. The project site is within Block 310001, Lot 41, a narrow corridor of land which includes a riverside walkway. The project site is adjacent to Block 31000 l, Lot 42, on Westchester Avenue, containing the existing Costco Wholesale and its associated parking Jot (Figure 1 and 2).

The Applicant proposes to stabilize 860 feet of bulkhead along the Port Chester Byram River Waterfront. The bulkhead has failed in two areas (Figure 3), leading to land collapse (referred to as "Activity Node" by the Applicant and the Village of Port Chester) and compromising the safety of the waterfront walkway.

As part of the SEQRA environmental review process, Historical Perspectives, Inc. (HPI) was contracted to conduct a Phase fA Archaeological and Historic Resources Assessment of the project site, which is_0.2 acres in extent. The Archaeological Area of Potential Effect (APE) is Limited to the area that will experience direct impacts as part of the proposed project and, for the purposes of this study, the APE is the same as the project area. The Architectural APE is considered to include the proposed development areas within the project site as well as tbe area substantially contiguous to the project site. According to SEQRA, the term "substantially contiguous" is intended to cover situations where a proposed activity is not directly adjacent to a sensitive resource, but is in close enough proximity that is could potentially have an impact. Generally, this would include resources that could be seen from "'long vistas" at ground level, until project development heights are finalized and an official viewscape can be determined. For the purposes of this study, HPJ considers one-tenth mile from the project site to be the approximate distance used to comply with this requirement.

The project site and adjacent lots have been the subject of several Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) studies as part of previous redevelopment initiatives (Village of Port Chester 1998; see also Longobardi 2013). While reports produced in 1986 and 1989 were part of a development plan that was never realized, the 1998 report was part of the renewal project responsible for the construction of Costco and the redevelopment of over 27 acres of land along the waterfront. Because of the scope of these projects, the Cultural Resources section of the reports incorporated any archaeological and historic sites within a large radius. There were, however, two Phase IA assessments that examined a few sites proximal to the project area The 1990 assessment produced one potentially significant finding -an early-to-mid 19th century well floor. Further testing was suggested, but not completed due to practicality and relative cost. In 1998, several lots near the project area were deemed potentially significant and subject to a Phase lB cultural assessment. A FOIL request was submitted in order to access the Phase IB and associated FEIS, but was not fulfilled in time for the completion of this assessment.

Environmental impacts were also assessed as part ofthese reports. The redevelopment site was principally on filled urban land and, consequently, most of the environmental concerns resulted from buried structures associated with the potential leaching of pathogens and solvents and mitigation recommended. The area continues to be reviewed and new plans for revitalization proposed (Village of Port Chester 2012a, 2012b, 2013; see also Longobardi 2013).

This Phase !A Archaeological and Historic Resources Assessment was prepared to satisfy the requirements of New York State's environmental review process, and complies with the standards of the OPRHP (New York Archaeological Council 1994; NYSOPRHP 2002). The HPI project team consisted ofDaryn Reyman-Lock, M.A., Ph.D., Julie Abell Hom, M.A., R.P.A., and Cece Saunders, M.A., R.P.A., who together conducted research, the site walkover, and wrote the report. Luc Litwinionek, Ph.D., R.P.A. contributed the graphics.

a METHODOLOGY

The present study entailed review of various resources.

• Historic maps and aerial photographs were reviewed at the Westchester County Department of Planning, the Westchester County Historical Society, the Rye Historical Society, the Port Chester-Rye Brook Public Library, and using various online websites. These maps and aerial photographs provided an overview of the topography and a chronology of land usage for the study site.


• Primary and secondary sources relating to the project site and its vicinity were reviewed. Repositories consulted included the Westchester County Archives, the Westchester County Historical Society, the Rye Historical Society, and the Port Chester-Rye Public Library.

• Several deeds were reviewed from the Westchester County Archives. • Property information, including engineering schematics of the project site, was provided by the project

applicant. • A site file search was conducted using resources from the OPRHP. • Prior Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statements for the project site were reviewed at the

Westchester County Archives and a Final Environmental Impact Statement reviewed at the Port Chester Village Clerk's office.

• Additional property infonnation was obtained from the Westchester County GIS database. • Last, a site visit was conducted on March 25, 2016, to assess any obvious or unrecorded subsurface

disturbance and to document historic resources on and adjacent to the property (Photographs 1-6).

lll. BACKGROUND RESEARCH

A. CURRENT CONDITIONS

The project site, Block 310001, Lot 41, is focused on 860 feet of bulkhead along the Port Chester Byram River Waterfront, located proximally to the Costco store and immediately adjacent to its parking lot (Figures 2 and 3 and Photographs 1-6). The modern metal bulkhead, rebuilt in 1998, has failed in two areas (Figure 3), leading to land collapse and undermining the stability of the waterfront walkway. Several emergency stabilization efforts have temporarily abated further deterioration. The bulkhead is anchored to the riverbed, and contains fill soils behind it. This area was originally under the Byram River, and was landfilled over time to create the existing line of the modem shore.

B. TOPOGRAPHYANDBYDROLOGY

Early maps of the study area and its vicinity record the topography and environment of the area at the beginning of historic development. Historical maps indicate that the project area vicinity was at one time a topographically low, swampy area that was progressively filled and graded as urban development required. The area containing the modern bulkhead, which comprises the project site, was once under water of the Byram River; landfilling during the late nineteenth and twentieth century extended the shoreline to its current boundaries. Prior to landfilling, the area adjacent to the project site would have been just at or above sea level. Unfortunately, historic maps do not provide elevations between 0-20 feet, and as this area would have been within this range, precise elevations were not given on historic maps. Current elevations of the landfilled portion of the project site are 14 feet or less as is indicated on survey maps, representing landfilling that brought the area up to its present grade. Today, the land to the immediate west of the project area is relatively flat, with a gentle upward slope beginning at the eastern end of Westchester Avenue. This slope reaches its highest elevation directly behind the marina, but as part of the development associated with. Costco, this area was regraded. This crest is located approximately halfWay between Westchester Avenue and Purdy Street. The topography oflhe project area and its immediate vicinity is shown on Figure 1.

The Byram River, a perennial waterway, runs along the eastern side of the project site, forming the natural boundary between Greenwich and Port Chester as well as the state line between Connecticut and New York. The project site occurs along a mile of the river where both ftesh water and salt water mix fairly extensively as Long Island Sound is less than one mile to the south. As a result, the river is tidal and the flow of water subject to reversal every six hours. The Byram River has been prone to flooding and is known to be relatively polluted. Consequently, there have been several interventions to limit ilooding and various development models to remediate further pollution and treat the current bacterial problems (U.S. Army Corp of Engineers 1977; Danzer 2011; Columbia EES Department 20 12).

C. SOILS

One soil type is mapped for the project site (U.S.D.A. 2016). This soil is described Table I, below. Figure 4 illustrates the soli mapped for the project site.

2


T bl 1 P · s·t s il a e : roject 1 e 0

Name Soil Horizon Texture, Slope Drainage Landform Depth (in) Inclusions %

Urban Land (UF) NA NA NA NA NA

As part of the Supplemental Draft EIS for the Marina Redevelopment project which included both the Costco land parcel as well a review of the bulkhead, an environmental site assessment was completed by Dunn Geoscience Corporation in 1990, another environmental investigation by J.M. Sorge, Inc. in I 998, and a geotechnical assessment completed by Langan Engineering also in 1998. These assessments surveyed several different lots which, at that point, were under consideration for development, and now host the Costco and its associated parking lot. The full environmental assessment and geotechnical reports were not included in the Supplemental DEIS, but the results were summarized in Appendices P and Q, and are excerpted, below.

D.

The Dunn Geoscience Corporation identified several areas of concern due to industries that required underground kerosene tanks, coal storage facilities, oil storage, and the possibility of methane generation in the soil. J. M. Sorge, Inc. was hired to conduct and investigation into these areas of concern and although a comprehensive plan designed to evaluate the existing environmental conditions in the development site was included in the DEIS, the testing had not yet been undertaken by the time the report was compiled.

The subsurface conditions encountered by both J. M. Sorge, lnc. and Langan Engineering in the explorations consisted of urban fill soils. Previous investigations associated with an earlier renewal plan in 1986 and 1989 indicate that the project area was composed of at least four feet of fill, which included concrete rubble overlaying lenses of silty-sand, glacial outwash sands and bedrock. These studies were not included in the DErS, but were summarized in section 3.3-I. Soil borings for nearby parcels were carried out, and the subsurface conditions encountered consisted of the following generalized strata:

1) Eill: Fill materials consisting of ash, cinders, coal, rubble and loose silts. The fill extended to depths ranging from 4-10 feet below existing grades.

2) Stream Deposits: Soft black to grey silt with variable composition ranging from fine sand, peat and clay with root fibers. This layer was 3-6 inches thick and was present immediately below fill layers.

3) Glacial Outwash: A layer of dense brown, micaceous fine sand was present below silt layers, between 10 and 24 feet below existing grades.

4) Bedrock: Precambrian Age rock called the Hartland Formation was encountered beiow the fill, stream deposits and glacial outwash in all explorations.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC SITES AND SURVEYS WITHIN A ONE MILE RADIUS

A site file search conducted using materials from the OPRHP indicated that there are two archaeological sites within one mile of the project site, o:ts described in the Table 2, below.

Table 2: Archaeolocical Sites within a One-Mile Radius of the Project Site NYSOPRHP NYSM Site #/Name Di.!ltance from APE Time Period Site Type Site#/Name 11944.000440 Location is general, ca. 0.8 Historic Domestic Lester Historic mile southwest historic site Shell Midden 11944.000441 Location is general, ca. 0.8 Prehistoric Traces of Grace Church mile southwest Occupation Historic Site

There are no S/NRHP eligible resources within the project site. The OPRHP lists several listed and! or eligible resources between 0.1 and 0.2 miles from the project site, including an historic district on North Main Street and a building located at 27 Traverse Avenue. The historic district is not substantially contiguous to the project area and

3


lies outside the viewshed. Further investigation of27 Traverse Avenue indicates the building is no longer standing. The lot was bought by G & S Port Chester, LLC and is now occupied by Costco.

The OPRHP notes three prior archaeological studies within a one mile radius of the project site. The closest study was a cultural resources assessment for the Fox Island Townhouse Project. OPRHP requested additional Phase m testing on the upland portions of the site as well as investigations adjacent to the filled part of the low-lying area of the site (Pickman 2006).

Greenhouse Consultants, Inc. completed a Phase lA cultural resources assessment for several lots near the project area inApril1990. This study found one potentially significant resource which was an early-to-mid-19m century well floor. However, further study was not completed as it was not practical for the relative cost of the project. This structure was listed as being found at 22 Westchester Avenue and is now covered by Costco. In August 1998, Eugene Boesch completed another Phase IA assessment on lots adjacent to the project area; one was the site of the former Lyons residence, while several others were marked as potentially significant due to reports ofNative American campsites and a possible village. A Stage ffi was performed on these sites as part of the FEIS. While a FOIL request was submitted, access was not granted in time for the completion of this report.

E. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT SITE

The project site is located near one of the earliest settled sections of Port Chester, known historically as Lyon's Point. The Sewanay Indians, a tribe of Mohegans, were the earliest known settlers in the area. In the early 17"' century, the Dutch founded New Amsterdam and soon thereafter, in 1640, the Du1ch Director General, Wilhelm Kieft, sent a representative to negotiate the purchase of several parcels ofland from the Sewanay (Scharf 1886: 629); although the boundaries of the purchases remains obscure, the land for modern day Port Chester was included (Griffin 1946:1: 131).

In 1660, three English settlers from "Greenwidge", Thomas Stedwell, Peter Disbrow, and John Coe, negotiated the purchase of Manussing Island from Shanarockwell, a sachem of the Sewanay tribe. Soon after, other settlers under the leadership of John Budd, bought more land and built homes on Manussing Island, Peningo Neck (now the Town of Rye) and the banks ofthe Byram River. By 1665, Connecticut merged all three settlements under the name of Rye and within 18 years, the area became part ofthe colony ofNew York (Shmmard and Spooner 1900: 123-124; French II 1925: 799; see also Bolton 1848, 8-9, 246-248).

In 1732, Lyon's Point was a main area of activity. Because of the logging and boat building industries established by the English on Lyon's Point itself, as well as a saw mill slightly further upstrea.m., the area became known as "Saw P.it" or "Saw Pit Landing". The first commercial activities revolved primarily around these trades, although substantial economic activity was centered on the shipping of local produce to New York City. By 1741, small parcels of land were organized and distributed to the "ancient Proprietors ofPeningo Neck". However, until the Revolutionary War, Saw Pit was barely a village and hosted little more than a few houses owned by boatmen, a few farms and one or two taverns, at least one of which was on Lyon's Point. Farmers living in the vicinity of King Street and Hogpen Ridge brought produce to Saw Pit's markets by sloop and shipped goods to New York on a weekly basis (Baird 1871: 267).

During the Revolution, Saw Pit was an important military outpost; it offered not only superior views from the top of Sniffen's Hill (later known as Bloomer's Hill, a location near modern day William Street), but also good accessibility to surrounding waterways. Consequently, both the British and the Colonial armies wanted control of the port. In an attempt to intercept any market ships bound to New York with provisions, the British anchored three vessels offManussing Island. The ensuing skirmishes nearly destroyed Saw Pit, and while many residents were British sympathizers, the John Lyon Homestead served as headquarters for American General Israel Putnam (Baird 1871:378). After the war, the village was rebuilt and its commercial industries reestablished. Farming, shipping and boat building increased and the area prospered. particularly after the construction of the Westchester Avenue, which allowed access to Lyon's Point and was previously known in part as "Lyon's Point Road", and Boston Post Road in lBOO(Baird 1871:267).

By 1837, several residents no longer believed the name "Saw Pit" was adequate as there was a change in economic pursuit; trade had changed substantially and the business of exporting produce had decreased. Although there was

4


some resistance, Saw Pit became known as Port Chester and the village gained a reputation based on some of its local industries, especially the production of stoves and furnaces. The Abendroth Foundry, one of the largest foundries on the East Coast, was established in 1840 on land just to the north of the project site (Village of Port Chester 2012b). However, the project site vicinity on Lyon's Point continued to be a major site for the lumber and coal industries into the early 201

b century.

Port Chester was incorporated as a village within the Town of Rye on May 14, 1868. The strong local economy, based on shipping, the Abendroth foundry, and agricultural industries, supported 3,500 inhabitants, two banks, coal and lumber yards on Lyon's Point, and several dozen stores. The 1867 Beers map (Figure 5) illustrates the project site vicinity during this period, but indicates that the project site itself was under waters of the Byram River. Agriculture and shipping began to decline, however, when the railroads were built. The economy changed and as the village was no longer dependent on its port, it became a center of manufacture and new companies, i.e. Earnest Simons Manufacturing Company, the first company in the world to product readymade sheets and pillowcases and who was also responsible for developing the Fruit of the Loom trademark, was established in 1876, and Russel, Burdsall and Ward Nut and Bolt Company in 1882. The new employment opportunities were accompanied by an influx ofEuropean immigrants which substantially changed the demography ofPort Chester. From 1870 until WWI when truck transport be<:ame more economical, there was regular steamship service from Port Chester to New York.

Historic maps show that during the final decades of the 19th century, the shoreline of the Byram River was extended further east through landfilling. The 1881 Bromley map (Figure 6) shows that the project site was still located just offshore, within the river, as does a Bird's Eye view from 1882 (Figure 7). However, the Bien map from t 893 (Figure 8) illustrates that additional landfill had extended the shoreline to its approximate current alignment.

Public services expanded in the last two decades of the 19th century. Port Chester Water Works was established in 1884 and private wells and cisterns were replaced with dependable sources of potable water from Connecticut Reservoirs. A community hospital and a trolley service were also arranged. Infrastructure improved with the widening and paving of roads and the installation of sewers and drains. By 1950, several corporations including Life Savers, Empire Brush Works, Arnold Bread and the Neisner Brothers, had established their headquarters within Port Chester.

Over the course of the 20th century, the economy of Port Chester began to shift once again. Many of the manufacturers began closing their headquarters and relocating their operations. The use of the project site vicinity also began to change; the coal and lumber facilities closed during the early part of the century and the structures progressively torn down. Instead of industrial maritime activities, the project site was used for privately-owned boat storage and docking, parking for the marina and a junk yard. Figures 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 illustrate existing conditions ofthe project site and vicinity through aerial and bird's eye photographs from the 1920s-1980s. The economic base of Port Chester declined in the 1980s and while there have been small areas of revitalization since, the village has increasingly focused on retail and service. South and Central American immigrants fuel this economic change, particularly along Main Street and Westchester Avenue where ethnic shops and restaurants are located.

Since 1977, Port Chester has wanted to redevelop and revitalize its waterfront and downtown area which was declared "blighted." The project site and adjacent lots contained junk yards, industry, multi-family housing, auto repair shops and some of the most deteriorated structures in the village (Village of Port Chester 2013). The first marina redevelopment projects were proposed in the late 1980s by the Robert Martin Company (New York Times 1986a-c, 1992; see also Longobardi 2013, 55-56), but were never realized. In April 1998, a redevelopment project was begun. G & SPort Chester, LLC entered into a Land Acquisition and Disposition Agreement with Port Chester which would see the redevelopment and beautification of a 27 acre area including the marina and the project site. The area implicated was named the MUR district- The Marina Redevelopment Project Urban Renewal Projectand would eventually host 500,000 square feet of modern retail establishments, all of which would be anchored by Costco. The scope of this project required the acquisition of 3 8 properties and the relocation of over 100 families and 52 local businesses. This redevelopment project has been undertaken in stages, the first of which was completed in 2002 when Costco opened to the public. As a part of this first phase of construction, G & S diverted money into public infrastructure and improvements, including a sea wall and waterfront park.

5


The development of the downtown waterfront entailed inspecting, repairing, and installing the current bulkhead. The retaining walls along the project waterfront were not built at one time. Rather, sections of the bulkhead were constructed in different stages over several years. The bulkhead to the north of the Costco lot within the small inlet is steel and was built by the Village of Port Chester in 1994 to replace a wooden seawall. lt was accompanied by a vinyl wall constructed by both G&S Port Chester, LLC and the Village of Port Chester cooperatively. The remaining portion of the seawall, including the 860 feet considered the project site, was inspected and evaluated in 1998 by Langan Engineering as part of the DEIS prepared for G&S in 1998 in advance of the construction ofCostco. Langan recommended several portions be rebuilt and stabilized, which G&S did as part of their development/revitalization of the waterfront (Lohud 20 I 0). G&S rebuilt the bulkhead in metal; however, it began to warp after a series of storms in 2010 (Port Chester Patch 2012). Sections of the wall began to collapse soon after and have continued to deteriorate over the course of the following five years. Although various emergency repairs abated further collapse, these were temporary fixes (Port Chester Patch 2012; Lohud 2015).

Table 3, below, outlines the specific history of the project site as depicted on historic maps.

T bl 3 P . t S"t d APE H" t ll e : roJec 1 eaa Js o.ry ---· Year/Source Description 1788 Erskine map Several structures shown on Lyon's Point in Saw Pit in the vicinity of project area, locations

imprecisely mapped 1833 anon. map Saw Pitt Listed on regional map, but locations are imprecise 1862 anon. etching View of wharf property of J. V. Peck as viewed from Port Chester marina. Area adjacent to

project site emp_ty save for piles oflumber. 1867 Beers map Several structures attributed toW. L. Bush's lumber and coal yard as well as Lyon's Dock

listed adjacent to project area, which is still shown as under water (Figure 5). 1868 Beers map Same conditions as the 1867 Beers map 187Z Beers map Same conditions as 1867 Beers map, except W. L. Bush's lunch and coal yard is now

attributed to J. T. Hall. 1881 Bromley map Structures attributed to J. V. Peck and coal yards adjacent to the project area; no structures of Port Chester listed to the south of coal yard, but land attributed to William Purdy (Figure 6). Project site

still under water. 1881 Bromley map Similar conditions as earlier maps, but no property divisions or landowners labeled. (towns of Harrison and Rye} 1882 Bromley map Several structures located on Lyon's Point, but no owners or businesses labelled (Figure 1).

Project site still under water 1893 Bien map Wooden structures attributed to C. H. Tibbits Lumber Yard and J. V. Peck located adjacent

to the project area (Figure 8). Landfilling has extended shoreline to approximate current boundary.

1901 Bromley map Structures attributed to C. H. Tibbits to the north of Westchester Avenue; several structures attributed to Port Chester Electric Light Company and George Martin Boats adjacent to project area.

1908 Hyde map Street map of Port Chester no structures mapped. 1910 Bromley map Same conditions as 1901 Bromley map. 1914 Bromley map Same conditions as other Bromley maps. 1925-6 aerial Area to the immediate west of project site has the same buildings as shown on historical photograph maps (Figure 9). 1929 Hopkins map Structures attributed to C. H. Tibbits and J. V. Peck now attributed to F. C. Mertz & Son and

Port Chester Lumber Company. 1934 Sanborn map Northern portion of lot attributed to both the project site and Costco listed as public land

with no stmctures (designated "STGE Yard" on map) and southern e>.tent listed as a wharf and marina.

1943 Westchester Only roads listed on map, no structures. County Department of Planning map

6


Year/Source Description 1947 aerial Fewer structures t1> the west of project area (Figure 1 0). photograph 1954 aerial Dock/launch structure constructed toward the south of project area. photograph 1955 Daily Item Only two structures remain. Area adjacent to project site is mostly a parking Jot and boat photograph rep()sitory. Boat launches and mooriitg§ constructed in front of bulkhead (FiRUfe 11 ). 1960 aerial Similar conditions as 1954 aerial photograph (Figure 12). ~hotograph

1986 aerial Area adjacent to project site vacant; several boat launches and docks constructed (Figure photograph 13). 1990 aerial Similar conditions as the 1986 aerial photograph. photograph 1995 at:rial Similar conditions as the 1986 aerial photograph. photograph

F. SUMMARY OF ARCHIVAL RESULTS

Modern Block 310001, Lot 41 was originally under the Byram River. It was landfilled by the end of the 19th century, to create the approximate line of the current waterfront The project site was further landfilled in conjunction with construction of the modern Costco building and parking lot, and the creation ofthe riverfront walk. Adjacent Lot 42 contained what originally were several smaller historic parcels, each owned by VBrious companies involved in the production and shipping oflumber and coal. These companies were in operation in the early 18th century and located on Lyon's Point, to the north and east of what the maps either refer to as the "Road leading to Lyon's Point" or "Lyon's Point" road (modem day Westchester Avenue).

G. ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES

As noted above, the OPRHP does not list any extant SINRHP eligible resources historic resources within or substantially contiguous to the project site.

As described in the Current Conditions section, the project site is adjacent to the existing Costco store and its associated parking lot, which was built in 2002.

IV. CONCLUSIONS

A. PRECONTACT SENSITIVITY AND DISTURBANCE RECORD

From what is known ofprecontact period settlement patterns in Westchester County, most habitation and processing sites are found in sheltered, elevated sites close to wetland fuatures, major waterways, and with nearby sources of fresh water. The project site was originally under the water of the Byram River. The current, modem bulkhead is still in the riverbed, while soil behind the bulkhead consists of imported fill. Hence, there is little precontact period archaeological sensitivity.

B. HlSTORTCAL PERlOD SENSITIVITY AND DISTURBANCE RECORD

The project site was completely under water until the t 890s. Landfill was placed in the project site, west of the bulkhead, to create the artificial shoreline of today. During the 201

h century the project site was part of the Port Chester waterfront Creation of the Costco store and parking lot in 2002 necessitated massive changes to the project site vicinity, including construction of the riverside walk. The current bulkhead dates to the 1990s. HPI concludes that the project site has no remaining historic period archaeological sensitivity.

7


C. ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES

There are no architectural resources to be considered for the present project either within the project site boundaries or substantially contiguous to the project site. There is one building adjacent to the project site: Costco. The building was constructed within the last 15 years and has no architectural significance.

v. RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the conclusions, above, HPI recommends that there are no cultural resources concerns for the proposed project and no additional work is required.

8


VI. REFERENCES

Army Corps ofEngineers 1917 Feasibility Report for Flood Control Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers Basin (Village and Town of

Mamaroneck, N. Y.) and Byram River Bastn (Greenwich, C. T. and Port Chester, N. Y.). Available online at htlp://www.nan.u.qace.army.mil/Portals/37/docsicivifworks/grojects/nvjJhn/mamshel/feasrpt.pdf. Aecessed on May 2, 2016. New York District U.S. Army COips of Engineers.

Baird, C'harles Washington. 1871 Chronicle ofa border town: history of Rye, Westchester County, New York, 1660-1870, Jnduding Harrison

and the White Plains till !788. A. D. F. Randolph and Company, New York.

Beers, F. W, 1867 Atlas ofNew York and. Vicinity. E. Beers and Company, New York.

!868 Atlas of New York and Vicinity. E. Beers and Company, New York.

1872 Atlas. of New York and Vicinity. E. Beers and Company, New York.

Bien, J. R. 1893 Atlas of Westchester Couhty, New York. Bien an~ Co., New York.

Boesch, Eugene J, 1.998 Stage !A Archaeological Investigati_on. Marina Red!Nelopmerit Project Area -Portions of Blocks 60, 98,

99, 100, 101 and 108. Village of Port Cheste1~ Westchester County, New York.

Bolton, Robert 1848 History of the County ofW?.sfchester: From its First Seltlemen~ to 1he Present Tim.e. Alexander S. Gould,

New York.

Boswell Engineering 2016 Project site maps.

Bromley, George Washington 1881 Atlas ofWestchesterCounty. George W. and WalterS. Bromley. G.W. Bromley and Company,

Philadelphia

1910 Atlas a/Westchester County, New York. George W. and WalterS. Bromley. G.W. Bromley and Company, Philadelphia.

1914 Atlas o[Westchesler County and·Vicinity. G.W. Br01rrley and Co., Philadelphia.

Columbia University 2012 Final Report on Byram River Watershed Model Development. Available online at

httn:/fwww .cl!:!oV/deep/lib/deep/water/watershed managementlwm plans/arrabvramm odel269 .pdf. Accessed May 2, 2016. Submitted to New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

Daily Item 1955 Photograph of the Port Chester Marina. September 23, 1955.

Danzer, S. 201 l Byra»J River Watershed Management Plan. Available online at

http:/ fwww.ct.gov(dcep!Jibldeep/watet/watershed ntana£lementfwm plan:ifbvram wbp20 12att.ptlf. Accessed May 2, 2016. State of Connecticut.

9


Erskine, Robert 1778 Survey #60. New York.

French,.Alvah P. 1925 History of Westchester County, New York. Two volumes. Lewis Historical Publishing Company, New

York.

Hopkins,. G.M. CQmpany 1929 Atla,s of Westchester County, New York. Hopkins Company, Philadelphia.

Hyde, E. Belcher 1908 Atlas of the Rural Country District North of New York City. E Belcher Hyde, New York, New York.

Longobardi, E. A. 2013 Main Street Remade: A Case Study ofEminerli Domain U~e in Port Chester, New Yo-,:k. Dissertation

submitted to the University of Texas- Austin. Unpubl.ishel!.

Lohud 2010 Pmt Chester moving t'O repair breached sea walL December 30,2010.

2015 Port Chester Bulkhead Fight Con~nues, Walk Shuttered. June 8, 2015.

New York Archaeological Council (NYAC) 1994 Standards for Cultural Resource Jnvestigat,ions and the Curation of Archaeo{ogical Cofledion~. New York.

Archaeological Cow;~cil.

New York State Office of Parks, recreation, and Historic Preservation (NYSOPRHP) 2002 Historic Resources Survey Recommended Standards.

New York Times 1986a Port Che~ter Seeking a New Downtown. July 20, 1986.

1986b Debate Raised Over Pact to Redevelop Port Chester. August 14, 1986.

1986c Contention Sun-ounds Contract for Port Chester-Redevelopment. December l4, 1986.

1992 If You're Thinking of Living in: Port Chester. May 31, 1992.

Port Chester Patch 2012 Port Cbestet, G & S Headed Toward 'Amicable Resolution' on Bulkhead Repair. J1111uary 18, 2012.

Accessed April25, 2016. Available hfip://patch.com/new-y~rk/portchester/port·chester-g-s-headed-towardamicable-re.solution-on9b71 fde678

Pickman, Arnold. 2006 Phase Ib Archaeological Survey. Fox·Lsland Tcwnho11se ProNct. Village of Port Chester, Town of Rye,

Westchester County, New York. Prepared for Lazz Development Corporation.

Sanborn Fire Insur!¥1ce Company 1934 lllsttrance Maps of Port Chester, N.Y. On file at Rye Historical Society Archives.

Sch!Uf. J. T. 1886 Htstary of Westchester County, New York. L. E. Preston & Co., Philadelphia.

Shonnard. Frederic and W. W. Spooner 1900 History of Westchester County New York from Its Earliest Settlement to the Year 1900. New York History

Company, New York.

10


State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) 2010 The SEQR Handbook, 3rd Edition. Division of Environmental Pennits, New York State Department of

Environmental Conservation.

United States Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.) 2016 Web Soli Survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed April21, 2016.

Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

United States Geological Survey (USGS) 2013 Mamaroneck, New York 7.5 Minute Quadrangle.

Village of Port Chester 1 998 Port Chester Modified Marina Redevelopment Project, Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact

Statement.

2012a Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Village of Port Chester, Westchester County, New York Comprehensive plan and Zoning Map and Text Amendments.

2012b Village ofPort Chester Comprehensive Plan. CPAC Recommendation Draft.

2013 Village of Port Chester Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Draft.

Westchester County 1943 Map of the VlUage of Port Chester. County of Westchester, State of New York. Department of Plarming.

Westchester County GIS 1925-6 Aerial photograph of Westchester County, New York.

1947 Aerial photograph of Westchester County, New York.







11


Figure 1. Project Site on Bayville NY-CT, Glenville CT-NY, Mamaroneck NY-a; Stamford CT 7~5 Minute Topographic Quadrangles {U.S.G.S 2013, 2015).

---- - --- --- - - -- - -- -

Figure 2. Project site and j)hotog-raph locations on aerial photograph.

- - - -

LEGEND

-AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT

[I)] AREA OF COLLAPSE

.. - - - -

aAIII.

Figure 3. Proposed project development (Boswell Engineering 2.016).

- - -

~ ...... _ ........

- - - - -

._ ltP'~-T.--,fti"""INt~--CoUAW:U -.rJ1lW&.·~~..:.~:-ADID\W7.

'· IU. -- IM4t. ..... "'aND. AIXDIUtiX ... - ""' ~~ ~1D'KiiiJrMM\Mama:t~'H-

~

... lf"..--..=f.~M.&r::.I':J:'A'lm:'.f RIIIW ...... ......_Halfl,.~fl~'

,. e-:=.~~"'T~::..~-:n."'o.. .. ~l'nJ!o~:E~~~ l"-al .......... f!Uull,_'ll¥li.LICA,._.

.........,..... .............

~

- -

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Figure 5. Project site on Atlas of New York and Vicinity (Beers 1867}. 200

I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Figure 6. Project site on Atlas of Westchester County, New York (Bromley 1881),

METERS

:too o 100 200

I I

-------------------

Figure 7. Project site on Port Chestet; NY (Balley 1882):

METERS

100 0 100 2.00

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :~:

.. , ··.·::

I I

Figure 8. Project site on Atlas of Westchester CountY,. New York (Bien 1893).

METERS

100 0 100 200

I I


Figure 9. Project site on l92S-6 aerial photograph (Westchester County GIS).

METeRS 100 0 100 200

-------------------

Figure 10. Project site on .1947 aerial photograph (Westchester County GIS).

METERS

100 0 100 200

-------------------

Figure 11. Project site on 1955 photograph (Daily ftem, Westchester County Archives).

METERS

100 0 100 200

-------------------

Figure 12. Project slte on 1950 aerial photograph (Westchester County GIS).

METERS

100 0 100 200

- --- - - -- - - - - - - - - -- -

Figure13. Project site on 1986 a!!rial photogrCiph (West~hester County GIS).

METERS

.100 200 0 100 f!f>


Photograph 1.

Photograph 2.

View looking northwest from the southern·point of the riverside walk.

View looking east from the northern section of the riverside walk,


Photograph 3.

Photograph 4.

View looking south from the piers attached to the housing complex on South Water Street, Greenwich, CT.

View looking northeast from the parking lot of Greenw,ich Bay Marina, South

Water Street, Greenwich, CT,


Photograph 5.

Photograph 6.

ViElW looking south from the piers attached to the housing complex. on South Water Street.

View looking northeast from the parking of Greenwich Bay Marina, South Water Street, Greenwich, CT.


APPENDIX K

SHORT ENVIROMENAL ASSESSMENT FORM (SEAF)


Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information

Instructions for Completing

Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information.

Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item.

Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information

Name of Action or Project:

Repair of Collapsed Bulkhead Section Along Byram River

Project Location (describe, and attach a location map):

Westchester Avenue, Port Chester, NY

Brief Description of Proposed Action: The purpose of the project is to repair the collapsed bulkhead and associated walkway and install a pedestrian bridge across the adjacent Inlet. The project proposes to replace the existing bulkhead in-kind and install a steel arch pedestrian footbridge to enhance connectivity throughout the waterfront park.

Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: (914)-939-2200

Christopher D. Steers, Village Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

Address: 222 Grace Church Street

City/PO: I State: I ZipCode: Port Chester New York 10573

1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO YES administrative rule, or regulation?

D If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that [{] may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2.

2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES lfYes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval:

D IZ1 Regulatory approvals from New York State Department of State, Army Corps of Engineers and local soil conseNation authority.

3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1.25 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 1.0 acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned

or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 1.75 acres

4. Check all land uses that occur on, adjoining and near the proposed action. IZJUrban D Rural (non-agriculture) D Industrial IZJ Commercial 0Residential (suburban)

DForest DAgriculture Ill Aquatic OOther (specify):

OParkland

Page I of3

I I

5. Is the proposed action, NO YES NIA a. A pennitted use under the zoning regulations? D [Z] D b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? D [Z] D I

6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? D [Z]

7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES I If Yes, identify: 31-90 D ll1 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES

ll1 D I b. Are public transportation service(s) available at or near the site of the proposed action? D ll1 c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? D [{] I

9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES

I If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies:

D ll1 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES • If No, describe method for providing potable water: Ill 0 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES

If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment; [l] D I 12. a. Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES

Places? [l] D b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? D [~]

13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? [ J ll1

I I

b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? [Z] D If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: I 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply:

0Shoreline 0Forest D Agricultural/grasslands 0 Early mid-successional I D Wetland tliUrban 0Suburban

15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed NO YES

by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? [l] 0 I 16. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES

I I I 1~1 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, Ill D a. Will stonn water discharges flow to adjacent properties? DNO DYEs

b. Will stonn water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and stonn drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: DNO DYES

I I I Page 2 of3

I

I I

18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids (e.g. retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)?

IfY es, explain purpose and size:

0 D I

19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility?

I I

IfYes, describe: 0 D •u~

20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or NO YES completed) for hazardous waste?

IfY es, describe: D 0 I I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE

Applicant/sponsor name: Christopher D .. ~teers, Village Manager Date: ?-!_,!_;;z.. ~----:::-,:,:-··- ~ -:.~··------

I

Signature:

I I I I I I I I I I I I PRINT FORM Page 3 of3

I


EAF Mapper Summary Report

l

' 0' . ··~ -_· ~ t 1 £(~ :~

0 ·-- -:,. - · . ., t . -

t

:Part 1 I Question 7 [Critical Environmental jArea]

Yes

Tuesday, January 31, 2017 3:16PM

Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist . ~U eJ"~.'Y. II?- project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental

assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are ~'I _ answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF

Cf. ~- e question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date dig~al data available to

R i ch 3 r.; DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order • to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a

substitute for agency determinations.

Part 1 I Question 7 [Critical Environmental Area - Identify]

Name:Long Island Sound, Reason:Exceptional or unique character, Agency:Westchester County, Date:1-31-90

Part 1 I Question 12a [National Register of No Historic Places]

'Part 1 I Question 12b [Archeological Sites] Yes

Part 1 I Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Regulated Waterbodles]

. Part 1 I Question 15 [Threatened or ~_n~~n~.~re~ ~!lim_<~1

Yes- Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.

No

Part 1 I Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Yes .......... ,.. - ... ···--- .... -. ~-" -·· -..... - ... -.-....... - ....... -. .. -..... ,-.-' ... , -- ------.-·-· Part 1 I Question 20 [Remediation Site] Yes

Short Environmental Assessment Form- EAF Mapper Summary Report

I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX L

I DESIGN PLANS AND DETAILS

I I I I I I I I I I

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

SHE£T riO.

REPAIR OF COLLAPSED BULKHEAD SECTION ALONG BYRAM RIVER

VILLAGE OF PORT CHESTER WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK

MARCH 2018

•..:..=::)

'.f.11["

INDEX OF SHEETS

OESCRIPOON

mtE »fiT

"

+- -::::::_::-:•"'-::.;~::=.,..-:-; --------1 Cf"" -~ rn_~~

"' fl.LVI\OOI'f-1

~'TION-2

Q •~•1<...1u.: '.''1\(llt_,. 1k

MAP OA"TA 2018 COOQ.£

KEY MAP N.T.S.

PLANS PREPARED BY

BOSWELL ENGINEERING 330 PHILLIPS AVENUE

SOUTH HACKENSACK, NEW JERSEY 07606 N Y CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 0012421

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL, P E

THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED FOR THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE WITH FUNDS PROVIDED UNDER TITLE 11 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FUND

JOHN R. VALENTIN, P.E.

Y!J..l.AQE._.QE_fORT CHESTER

MAr.QE RICHARD A, rAL.ANKA.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES GREGORY K. ADAMS ON-IIEL BRAKEWOOO G£NE C£CCAA:£W FRANK FERR.t.RA. LUIS A. MARINO BART DIDOEN

- -

- - - - - - -

GENfRAI NQlfS

1 Df'SION $P(CW1(;AlPI$: I'I~TLIV'DRDCE DIESICH !JIEOFJCAllOHS111n1111.L ~ti'WISJOtrl$ 1111! Elfn:T loS OJ N~Y, 211011 ~I'Oit DDIO!I PI.IU'CSES, ct*Pf~U"J!VE. S~ or Qi;JHOI[IE J"QR SUBSJliiUt"J\JII:ES .WO DECJ( s.J,SS AT 2e CAl'S" f'c - lOOCJNI.}

'l ~ 1oH11 MAJOMLS SPfllnCATIONS. :iJANOAIQ SPEUlCAllCINS. ~ oUCJ '-'A!EftW.S N£111 'YORK STAll ;:JEP~1WOIT OF ~~~J:.s.~IMTDIW.TI 2001LWI'OICUIIIIENT

3 ~r:l=~~~n~~~AU.sl.JfA~ "Ll.~OI'tA'MNO$ 5UIMIT'ImfCIR THIS PRO.ECTSI1o'.I..L BE: Ill US OJ!rrOI!INIY

'""'" !> ~:~r~,~~~~J0~c~-a·~~tJ.J..~

'~~f,~=~l~~~~~~u;'E~~li!Dn< "'-""&

? ~Fllfi:1WIClCHES!iiES:FSJm..ROUEDo\NCl£~41Cl51RUC~ Ill8lt<G ME PCWN oii!CtCIROiffC; TO lH£ IIISC tMHUM..

10. ~:-~rc1st~~~~,~~Al.lliF:Olloti'...CliD

'1 ~ACTDII C 10 U.Y 8AOC A I'QIIIllc.f 01 11'«

£AA1H ~TTONCot.A~ JtrQ.IIAIHC A c~ ..... ~~p O:tEJISCINS Cl Ttit ~ fftctSSNtY TO k'E.D' "'4101 ,_ £11 -..c twt £Jft:o\lfAl!CH $hH.f. liE FI.JIVr!l9lC NfO f'1Jial) Af H0 CO$T to 1tt( Alt,

S M1alf A COfrullMI IS i.llm, ThE COST (S; ll£fl'lri'IVIING lHE Et!UR(. =_v~f'bllll£~~~ rEIIM.ltR, SH'-U fJEIJftWI)fO .. 1M( UNit

(. SHOUUlFIELD~REOUIRtAOiAtoGEI'ROWIKT'I'P(OfCOFll:ffi)Not S\'SJE\1 CAUm FQII ON 1Ht fii.-"C$. '04£ £NCIJUFI-,... OiNtCE 5tW..l CONTACI 1t1t. Pc..t.s. FIR COORI)jN.I,'IIOII•lH UIPRQPAIAT[ A(l(NCif$ TO .t.f'l'ltO\I. lJC[ '"-Q. Ill Wli\.IIP'l.t CXlf'ftfUWIS All( !IIO"I.ACUI trr A 5NU. 5'1'51'01 A.S PO!;kiiTTUI 8Y M AEQONN,. K"'''OtAUuCS£NC:IN(DI PA'TNENl 9W.l. BE IIAStD OH Atl (IF ~ N'~ tOFFPOMI rmtS IHDitA'F£0 ~ lkt fii.AAS.

i,._{i\lrA~~~-\ot~~~JY~~ ~,.:~"':cTw~~~·>\1,~~~~ ~:!s!:=/i~B~l'£01G!JfEIR~4:EMO

"ll6JlOl ~11Ciot. DAl'LM NORll'l ~ IIEROC"'l OA~ 1M!! (1CA"rtlee} HOeZOIOAI,. OA'IJ.N. MORTH AWERICAH DAJU!Iol \M3 i~1

M1DO'IENlfl.OODl.£16.15£SJIW.lEI!T08EI2nfooiORl\<~'4JiliCAL

~~~\~~}M~~~'f&1!R&~D.£'1AtiON I'M

""

- - - - -

11 !!'!rf..B~5llD. $kAU. tOiftRN TO ~TM M1!oM (~GO) ~~~:c n:tl, IJoP' I.D'Gnt$ !iMM.L liE .ul BAR DIMC£1ERS UIUU

c .W. RDIFORQHC. :t1U1. c.£UI: (OYD $1ol...U. IE AS FOU.OWS LM.£SS OlKJIJJIISl'JIOtttl: •t'OJICR£ttCI.$TAUNNS'ft.tA1Ml" • AU. ono ~--111--PL"~ CONCRr'l£ 2·

11LSHOf"DitA..C0~1'ULS.UU:IItOUIRill10RIM:PEDESflltMM081C'ra.L ~(TWO~I'f&l1t.

1!J £1(l\,lll(lll: SilW.t.(:t$ (J' t€W CCitCftE1[ WALLS Nlll SLM5 SHAU. 8( 51:Rm ~~:~~~~Of' STIIUCrurtAL CtwaltTE

Zl~~~~~~~Bfs~ IOOIC(IllC»>AHI;IRtliOVAt.WOIII'I.SkAU.f'ftOCtm .. AW:~WHICH Pltt\IDinDNAAGETCtHEIJCI!>Jit&S'IRUC11..Rt!S Jl(f~ltllM£"DIISllNO SllWCl\.WIES fO RE .. M SHJo&..L. II£ AD'AMIED 1r1' 1)1( CQPinu.ctofi' A.f NO COST .......... =e~li~~~~~~~it~ ~~&~lHE Et«::NE:fR 'IHIInY(JO) ~...,NQ ro

-

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

-----··----

- -

JOHN R. VALENTIN

- - -

___ .,..""""""' (W-WAl[JI U .. T Of ~'l\IJI8Af<t0

--·-fllol.~~tui.NHfltJitl£

·- ··-PifKHU,OUN~

~------ &ul.KHLoAO LJNI:

REPAIR Of" COLLAPSED BUU<HEAC SECTION ,._LONG BYRAM RIVER

GENERAL NOTES & QUANTITIES

-

- - - -

GRAPH!f SCALE

- - -

•/',/

:~~--

BYRAM RIVER

/<~-~-:

-'// /

t·"'!'

, . .._,;;'·-.

./ -.. - .~ _ _,...:.;}

;;: ~>:~:.-

<."· :/~:;,~'---.r)"' - . - ~·· z .F ••

/'?~ T

PJ'

~ ~·-.'

1p • ~' .,. .,

.'*' ·'·

-

-.~-

lc:)

-

- ~ , .':

·-7t:~

._. .. "-~<,;;·. ,\.,·-

-

\ ~~?~ti-,.

,\:< ~ ~,

..

~~<· --~ ~..:._ ,/ '·'

\

·~, -... ·~. " . ..,. \

':\. ' " ~'

5'

' '¥ ~.{ ... ·, ' ~

'·· :.~_~'\. .,, . '

\';.. ~,., -~' /. >,•., :,~ \ ·-''/'' ..... ./ /' ..... ~;/

'·. './ ;j·· •. >.;/ ·'/

/// ... __ _ l '?49

,./~-,<1'4'

~0--i - i ~

(GII"EE'lf ·-·10•

t t=1 -· __ _._, __ tJJ=tJ t.C I OAT{ I DfSC~--~-·--

I_ BosweLL-8 ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PlANNERS - SClENllSlS 530 PH'lliPS A.li[NJE, SOiilH twXEMS:AOI:, N J ll7606

TtL. (201) &4T-o770 • ~AX. (ZOT) .. 1-1&31 N.J. CUfiTlCATE Of" AU'lHO!tiZATJON NO 24011o2MI!IOCIO

- - - -

•' ;-_

~- ..... ,

\.~.?.:? ·::-,:><7:

;/-- - -~ - '

- - - -~

1 f'OII' «NNJlAL 'Kl1tS. 5[E 9ttT 2.

2.FQII;I..f.tlO«).stf~2.

J. I,I£NIIf1iOKW.li:Ril.EioA110HlS.3.2J1 tTlSLOCAl(DaT 1'11£liUU()IE-'lJI.Qtll[S$0~1£5>fO'IIIItl

"- loi[NI LOW II'AlER [ILVAUQfrl 1$ -~tf" tr 1$ l~lB) "'' I'I£8UI.JOtlAOUNI.L'SS~lilSHCI!f(

-4:--' -::v-/-::-· \. . . -~WI ·-~· ~;~~ ,~ ~;, .

4'

~\~ ~·

....,

\z~

~

.. EL.-15.o'{Wit)

!\,· •• '"'-"'"'

SECTION 1-1 SCALE t/8. • 1'-(1~

tiP £L -2~0'{1111N)

""""~ lltTIJNINGWAU..- ~ ~I.Rf'A. ~ ·- -.. . .. ,J___... ~ I ,Ji

··~

STEPHEN T BOSWELL

~~!l.TUC.I»lmo

A I ±ttl . ~ .. ,...__

5ECTION 2-2 ~IJ!!"aJ'~

JOHN R. VALENTIN

;&(-a:-----PRCf~ OtOIHlDt III.Y uc 07SU

SIG£WAAD Wfl1.. ~

'TIP Q.. -te.O'{IoiiN)

liP Q,. -:$.cr(Wt}

REPAIR OF COLLAPSED BULKHEAD SECllON ALONG BYRAM RIVER

EXISTING BULKHEAD PLAN AND SECTIONS 'w'IUAG£ Of P~T OfE'STE~

W(SfCI-f!Sf[R CO\JNTY

::.w:·":" "'·~"'"'" -~-

-~15-192

r.flft YORl<.

"""'" -3 •26

-

- - - - - -

, >-211-11 l'l[liiS[D PER~ OOtMJI1'S

~Q~ M'l.fiUPli;)N

- - -

BYRAM RIVER

..... ~-<~ ~-=- \:..-

·--~· .... ··''

ENGINEERS - SUR\IEYORS - ?LANNERS - SCIENTISTS J30 PHll.UPS AvtNIJE. SOUTH JolACKENS.\CK. N J. 07606

1t.L (201) Ml-o770 • fAX. (20\) C141-1&J1

- - -

.. ,_ '

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

- -

:.··'

JOHN R. VALENTIN

- -

~ I '~ctN£1!""'-ft(Jl:D,SiE£SHirT2

:~. roN ~LiiOIO. sa: slittl z.

-

.3 lo!IENI>¥0HlMTEA:EL£V,TKlMISl.!lO' IT~L~Ut!lll lHE 8ui.J(jo£Jr0\H..£SI Ol'HEA'MS£ S110V1t.

4 WIEAH ..I:tW WATEJI El.tVAliON IS ~).tt' rT IS lOC41lii .\l THE8UI..JCHtAD IJitUSSO'IN(RMSE~

GRAPHIC SCALE

ko·...L:-i i i REPAIR Of COlLoA.PSED BUU<HEAO SECllON

ALONG BYRAM RIVER GENERAL PLAN

NEW YORK

-

- - - - - -BYRAM

!

I! ' I· .. ,_ ' i l ! ! ! ~)

.. ~. -·.

' ~,/· 7

_';~_.-/

--1 ~~-.; .::.~

Ri\tER

- - - - - - -

"!' 'r' ' ~ ·· . . -,

,,~.

·~):

,.-.

··><. ·'

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

- -

./

... .; ~ < ':::.>z:~; ';-)''

~\ ..

JOHN R. VALENTIN

- - -

/ ,.,_ /

1 fOR CEH£RAL HOlt'S. £ SHEil 2.

L rOR ~. SEE Si£E1 2.

.l l,ii£Mt>tGH.,.l[R£1LVA~IS.UO.ITISL.OC-.liDoi\T lH£ BIAJ(HEoJIGIJNLlSS OlH[Rifl\ll( SI40'*.

GRAPHIC SCAL£

k·.wLJ-.i T REPAIR Of COllAPSED BULKHEAD SECTION

ALONG BYRAM RIVER PARTIAL PLAN-1

V'IL!....t,-:;r ~PORT r.HfSTfR

-~15-192

-

- - - - - - - - - -

b,sosWELL-ENGINEERS SURIIEYORS - PU\NNERS - SCJENTISTS

330 PI'IIWPS A\'DI.IE,. SWlH HACKEHSAOC k.J 07605 ttl 201) 641-D770 a flU: (201) 641-1$31 K.J 'fti'JCA 01" HJ lll'QI 'It! :l<IOA2mtl000

I '~:zt~l6 A("'9EE i>£(1 II':SDf.C ~

NO DA l~ l~i;."j("Rf-.> IJ(:J. .. oy.<IJO'l Z lo.o.Uo._

- - - - -

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL JOHN R VALENTIN

- - -

\. r.llt COCIW. t«~TtS. S[[ $H£lT 2.

4 nil L[G£ND. 5tt1Hfr12.

:0 ~ I'IIO>l WA1D; ru'lloi.IION IS .!.ZQ' IT IS !.OC.O.TEP AT K~U.O.S.

4 ~lOWW.0.1DI £L£YA1lOIIIS -3.9$ ITI$L000.'ti:PAT 1Nt 8\UUoii:AO WI.US O'IJtfFMS£ :sHOIIIrl..

CRAPJiiC SC A.L.E

~~W::=i- __ j

REPAIR Of COU.APSill BUU<HEAD SECTlON ALONG B'I'RAM RIVER PARTIAL PLAN-2

VIlLAGE rF PORT CI-I£S'ItR wt:S:tCMtSTER COJNTY - .... -.- .. --·~15-192

-

- - - - - - - - - -

TYPICAL SECTION STEEL FRAME!l CANTILEVER WALKWAY ISJA 1±50) SCAI.E-'/IB-.. 1-u-

TYPICAL SECTION STEEL fRAMED WALKWAY fOB ACCESS RAMP <STA .!i±SQl

I_ BoswaL-8 ENGINEE~S - SUR 1/EYORS - PlANNERS - SCIENTISTS .l3Cl PHI~LIP$ A\t'Nl4: S()U'IH I'IACKENSADl, M...J. CfAOe ~ (201) ~1-0770 • F-'X (201) &4l-18JI IIIJ.CDmi'ICA.lE(J"I'il1liOfltlAMN!t02~796lt'IIXI

- - - - -

T)l?!CAl SECTION - S!ff! FRAMED CANTILEVER (STM±.W SCAli: 'f'lr"'1-Q"

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL JOHN R. VALENTIN

- - -

2. f'ORL£('£N[)SC:SH£t:T2

:! llltAH HICH litii.IER El£VAliOH I$" 1HI' IT IS lCICA'JED Al nt£ .IIU,.kt£\DU..Q.S..

"- loiE»> LOW W.O.mt ll.E'IAtiOH rS -l.lll' IT IS .LOCA1EJ) AT 'D<f SlA.Xi£.UI LNI.£!:5 Onow.st: SHDWk.

!.. ,.ORIOD«.RAA.PJ..NtS.SEt~S4-6.

REPA1R OF COI..l.APSEO BUU<HEAO SEC110N ALONG BYRAM RIVER

TYPICAL SECTIONS-1 'oi1UAGE Of PoRI t."HESTE~

-

- - - - - - - - -

TYPICAL SECDQN 71£0 BACK STEEL SHEET PILE BULKHEAD (STA 9+00 TO STA 10+50)

~.3/1&"•10"

TYPICAL SECTION TIED BACK SITEL SHEET PILE BULKHEAD (STA 13±00 TO STA 14±00)

SCotLt:J/1l"•1wO"

!!!>£!. -l&.O't.

- - -

""'"" f---'=~,;;,.u~··--1 ... ~ .. ·

_liPa...-II,!U:

-~-:ti..P.: __

- - - - - -

------~

l-----

D 1lP R. -130'1.

TYPICAl SEcrtON-TIED BACK STEEL SHEET PI· E BULKWAO ~.!,.J.l+OO TO STA J2+5Ql

'''"'''"'"' ~-,

5CAI.C J/115"•1 ...

TYPICAl SECTIQN-KING PILE BULKHEAD WALL {SIA 14+50 TO SJA 16±10 37)

SIC:M.£ Jf't" ... l-0~

!!!QliS.. I FOAOEW£RI,LHOUSEau:T2.

l.fllRl£C!:'M)!Il'I.~T2.

l.~~I'I.NIS.Ii!I:~~

le,sOSWELL-STEPHEN T. BOSWELL JOHN R. VALENTIN REPAIR OF COLLAPSED BULKHEAD SECTION

ALONG BYRAM RJVER

ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PlANNERS - SOENllSTS JJO PHILLIPS ~;t:NU(, SOIJll-l HACKENSACK. N J. 07606

~ cW~S:';;.,o~=~ s~o:L.::~

n'PICAL SECTIONS- 2

-

I I I

I

I ! ~1~ ~I

I if ~ I' g

' .

I I I I

f ~~ ~ I

I ~ I ~ 0

''\ ...,

~ ~ ~

! ::l ~

~ s 0 ~ ~

.,;

I I 2: l'>l :I:

"' I i ~ [/J

I I

/_.l

: );/ _1_, ' ' -·' / ~

·:i<.>r ~ .,~,.· .: ' < -;-·>'.: £'. -~ :(·<~·""':._"·

I /

I 0: w •. > Ci ·I

I I I I I I

- - - - -

I \

- - - - -

BYR.AM ~!VCR

"',_, --· '-

- - -

<_

\'.-':,~.

--:-..... I'

.··-/-'

'-;

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

- -

SIMP! lf!EQ PLAN

JOHN R. VALENTIN

- - -

%.Fat~$tt3'Uf.2

.1. loll!~ HICtl WA"'ttt EUVA~ IS 3.20'. If IS iDCAlU) 4f

1l{ IIWGOtl LNtSS o--4 Mf:lt,J<4 t.0w W#.ttlt Q.EV.4110to' 1$ -l,Qt' lffS"I.QCI.ItJ) AT

1HC IIIJUCH(.Mt ~ss O'IMR'MS£ SI1Co-..

GRAPHIC SCALE

!DinEr} ......... ,., 1\

.,.

R:EPAlR Of" COLLAPSED BUU(HEAO SECTION ALONC 8'111A~ R1VER

GENERAL PLAN

-

- - - - - - -

!'rP!CAL SECTION - STEEl FRAM£0 .!;ANT!LEVER WAL~WAY (STA 1±50)

SCAl.E l/16"•1-0"

- - - - - - - -

TYPICAl $£CDON STfE! FRAMED CAN'n! EVER

~ SCAlE J/\15"-1-0"

r------.,£-;;ST"IIiATE OFOUAN1i=-~ll~ES~--------,

·UHITI Pt.N.~ ' I OHN t~~ l

100 ~AR F\.000

~-

----~--- -· -~ -- -· -j -------- --- ----·-

-~

TYPICAL S~CDON- DEQ BACK STEEL SHEET PILE BULKHEAD CSTA 11+00 TO STA 12±50)

SCALE 3/ttil" ... t-o"

I_ Boswa.L~ 8 ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS 3JO PtiiWPS AVEtiUE SQJTH HA04.'NSACK. N.J. 016015

TEL (211\) 6<41•0710 .. FAlt (201) B41-l8J1

SIMPLifiED PLAN

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL JOHN R. VALENTIN

~EHQ~t~EERN.Y,UCC.7010

REPA!R OF COLLAPSED BULKHEAD SECTION ALONG BYRAM RIVER TYPICAL SECTIONS W..ll•;( OF j:t~T ~SlrR

wtSTCr<STER COl.Jk,'\"

=~;;:;~1=:~:.

-~15-192

-

- al - .. -•' "

- .. - - - - - .. - ... - - -

~

-·~·--· -- ·--Jfr;.!___:j ftE:TAlt41G wi F==-- I I ·---· I fl ~---- I I l,.c='· .. '"' ¥-"'"""" if. } j) tb . - -h'I~"'T ~ f ~T_._;--:-.,;;- ---

BWII!IS

sl ST([l$tl£E11NG .tj IM.OUI[AD ffH.1 ~ ~

c:orQ'[l[ :ra.1J.~ --~--_k:.,C:TW 11...10

!'!Q!E:L. 1, rOR CIEIIIERAL t.olES. SEt Sra1 2

2 fOII.WH.l.OE1M.$.SE£:5t!EV:2.

.1 5U CUNSI'Rut.'l'IOK "L.Ht!l Fat A:Et ... IKINC ... ALL. ltlJCNW£M1 DH 5HIXT ~

4 ros .. "TCH UN£ c-c, m SH«T u

l _ . tttl.t- . _ _ HttlitHtHtH~tl1tHtHtttHI=itHI I''· ,n+H1+8-t-8f1+!1 1 1 1 1 rtmmm1M1tl1ti11M1n+m-++n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I IiI I II I I I I I I I I I I I II I, 11 I ~ ; ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I' l ~!1-z~l.UJ.U.lLL ... _,_u.>-u...LLULUlU_LLIJ. LUlU .lU.lU.lLUlU_LU.l LU .Lu .J..U..L U..l.LU LU .LU.l.U.J.LU .LU.LU.lLij

f.LE.YAil.Qri GRAPHIC SCAL!

LEGEND JsyLW' i j

I_ BoswELl.-8 FNGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS - SCIENTISTS JJO PkiLitPS AVENUE. SOU'JH 1-!,t,Q(£HSACIC, tU 07606

!e: go~,;o~~:~ ~t!;~

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

,. .. ""'"""" JOHN R. VALENTIN

--~

..'f"f~-:::zt~ ~ ENCMZ11 tt., UC. qns.u

~!!'~·ft.

REPAIR OF" COU..APSEO 8UlKH£AD SECTION ALONG B'fflA.M RIVER

ELEVATIONS -1 lo'IL.Ar.E. C~ ~1 ..-.1-<[:0TfR-

r.IEIW~K

_..,0 •26

...

- - - - - .. - - - - .. -· --

,11111! I 1111111111111111111 111111111111 I 111 llllllllllllllllllllllllllll 111111 1111111111 1111111 11111111111111111 11111111111'

q ~ ~ : : : I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I ! I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ll Ll J!!:,!h-~-Ll UJ LU .LU .LUJLU LU .LU 1 Ul LU .LU .LU _l UJ LIJ .LU.LUJLIJ LIJ.LU j_ UJ LIJ .LU.LU_l UJ LU _LU _LU~LL..l LL.LLU..L UJ.LU LU .LU ..L U..l.lj

!~ ~~ ~!

!llYAl1Q1i

I

11 II 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I II II 1 II I I I I I I I tM I I l II I I I! II l I I I I II I II I I I I I I I I II I I l I II I I I I II I I I lit I I I I I 1 '•J ..L.lplf-Ll-p-1f-Urtl~~tt1J.1.) •llllltllllllllllllllllllllll 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111 i Ill 1111111 II: I I I till Jill Jill Jlll till Jll ~1...1."'-"'"-"'l>!.lJ..l Ll...l.l-ULU..LLLLLUl-UJ...U..LU..l.LUJ...UJ...U..l.LULUJ...LJ..LUJ.~_LUJ.U..lLUl.U..LUJLULLJl.U..LU-"".!!..:.!•.2..~ __!_[).1_ __!_[).1_ ____il,/.L =##= l)l

mn lT)j'-.affif liif =mr= ~ Is :" llll~j 1111 1111 1111 1111 I~

-c , r~..... ~WJ..~. WJ WJ WJ WJ ~ ..., L_L_ IIU.XMEAQW...U.

~ - ---=- - ~--

~

l!lQIES.. t. FOR GDDAI... rUiltS. 5E£ 5iUt :Z..

2. FOR '**.!. OU:M.$. K1: StaT 22..

.1 ~ ~ I"U#I J"(JI: I!ElNIOWG WAU. ~Ofri1HErf'-

"- fOR MA.TOI LN: C:-(. SU. M£'1 10..

GRAPHIC SCJ.a

ko-.tw' LW TOP aE ..... l ... 80fTOM ~ W.ul.

-

STEPHEN T BOSWELL JOHN R. VALENTIN REPAIR OF COLLAPSED BUU<HEAD SECllON ALONG. BYRAM RIV!l<

ELEVATIONS -2

N/A. GM $!(" JIN J.30 PHt.r..JPS A.\IENU£, SO'.JTH HACI(DISAQ(. N.J 01606 lEL· (20t) 641-0770 • FAX. (201) 6~1-1831 111-J aR~Tt or ~lHORll.-.TIOtt NO 24CA27til000

~€HCIMEERN.TUC..057DII)

'ill LACE 0:: PORT CH[Sl[R

t,fW YORit.:

-~15-192

-

- - -

.,

"'"""'' ..

... - - - - - -01 ~ 00

I! 100 )UR BOQD;l100

~' '"""" "''"'"" ' __.-J.lL ~

----·-----c~m-oi.Jiti:- --------

00+50

I .. ·-~~

T~· ...

____,_,.,._---""'l!l.>.>

~~---~c.;,;;;;;. ... ,""'~-------

~-~r '

---·---~------·•2

J30 PHIWPS A\£1f.J£. SOUTH HACKE"'SAA<.. )II,J, 07606 T£L 201 ~1-ono • FAX. (ZOI} e"',_,a,s,

- -

•· NE.W Wfte.

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

..

02+50

!DO Thf!~OOtllQ9•

7~<~...k.) -------"11!\.1.~

! t ... --

! 100'!fftRhOQQ;l1QQ!

f.,.,..,.. . I

I~ j_...,.,.... ,,_...,.. I ,_,.,

I ··~-··SIT 1-AbTOR£D CAAIIE l ~-4 ' 1-,--.. I •'-o..~.m-a.:-~--------1' 12' ; I ~--~~ . ' : t .• ~ '

TW. lOPfE'IW..L ~H.\ft. W[Hi Nl(lHE'R ttQI W'T£A ~1\W, WEAN~ Wllt.JER lf-1,.W 111tAN UN WJ.1trl ... ..J... lolr:Ntl.OKJti.WIU.l[JI'

JOHN R. VALENTIN

- -

,, - ----!.

' -~~

_,.

GRAPmC SCALE

k;-....Li-i

REPAJR OF COLLAPSED BUU<'HEAD SECTION ALONG 8'fflA.U RIVER

CROSS SEC110NS -1 tilt-"<:£: or POfl r 01E.STER

-~ 15-192-Aiternotes

-

- - - ... - - - - - - - -

03400

!! .,.,..,,...,,..,-~5El)SIJIJO£to0 --!! ~~

l,eosWELL- STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

- -

L J

----111

I

.. io

1 i I

--: t.;.:.-; ;..--;;.---:--- -~- -~=-:.-~t-- -~-~- ~ -~~-~---- -~ i

"

---- --- ...... __ I

I ,,

---- - -1c --- 1(:

-- -~ ~ ... -' - -;-e

Ol$1ING ;~ -------- -~. ---:-.=_-_:"'---~---- -::---·=---....... ----- -~ -J-u

ToP OF WAll IUI.JUl loi(NliN-IEJIIIQi'a'Al£R WJi W.. wtMf HIGH WA1tR VL• lolf:Mlo-1 -.ttlt ..U,.....W. fiiENI.t.O\IISI UlW WAttfl

JOHN R. VALENTIN

,t((~---·-

--- j•lli

CRAPHJC SCAlE

ko-~·

"I ,-2<1

ill

' ---'8

!-e !_,7

REPAIR OF rou.APSEO BULKHEAO SI:CTION Al.ONG BYRAW RIVER

CROSS SECTIONS -2

-

- - - ... - -

.. ~ "

06+00

-•.

D-ta IIEIIIml-·~~fS N/A GK Clll: , .sw t.~o ')A;'f or:;::~~--

- - - - - .. -

.,- --- -4.--· ---

------------ -·- --~·---------

.. 1-

'1 ,, ' -•:-

~e -e; ll!

-16 16

I_ BoswELL EHGINEE-- ENGINEERS SURIIEYORS - PlANNERS - SOENllSTS

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

... -

lcf'I'F-..!. ~14GMEJfi'J(J{'IUo1'[Jt

W[MNQ-IIIATER lfLW. IIIUJI LOW WA1tA U.LL-W.. WUH LOIER LDW WAl[ll.

JOHN R. VALENTIN

- -

GB.A..PBJC SCALE

ko-J!I·U··i

-

REP AIR Of COUAPSEO BULKHEAD SEC"OON ALONG BYRAM RWER

CROSS SECTIONS -3 \1Llo'.CE OF ~T OiE51I.R

_.,15-192

-

·"

- - - -

NC r=;:-~-~~ fi(R =~:;:ts

- - - - - - .. - - - - - - -

w~~ln -~·-~-~~~~ ::-~-------- ,.;:,;r . ,· ' ... ..,_,_, -•' -_-·- _- ~;;;-t.:-:J:::le: -=---=-:.-..:'::.':._-_..:.:.-.:·:.;-:..:~ --_-_:... -_- -:.--...

""i.'~-11 . ~---·--··--

--~-~·-. ~-

N/A. I Gil t gr 1.//fV

~£1.-U.!. ., ... ~ ..,,i,;> ...._

~BOSWEU--t.N~..t~N~!! - SURVE'YORS - PlANNERS - SCfENTISTS

3lO P+illl.IPS A. VENUE. SOUTH KAOCEIIIS~ N..J. 016QI!I

~ d;~';o~zr~ !om!lc!:~

... et.-110

___.....

__ -_i"~~r:Htl~-~ h---- '

~ i ~~mriM· --+----

-} -

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

PIIDfESSIOIW...EMGINEER N'l'.UC-0510\CI

--:----- ~-12

lli2lliQ. TW. tW~WAU. ... JtJlill. U(Nri ttQO l«i>1 -.mrt lol)l.: I«..IJJIM;HW.il(l!

~· UC.UCI..OWWo\'TEJI IU...l.W. .!lEAN l..tNIDI. LD" WAliJt

JOHN R. VALENTIN

lbf~.:::---

~ PfQhUJi N..T UC lrnll2l

GRAPHIC SCALE

~-..1 :i •• t r ~

,t!,!!':)a.

REP AtR OF COLLAPSED BULKHEAD SECllON ALONG BYRAM RIVER

CROSS SECTIONS -4 VILL4C£ 'Y POP1 CI-IESTER

-

- - - - - -

"

-2~

1-1----1-- ---. 1--~---

---+-+-I ll-29-1&l~f'Utlort5D[t:CCNI.IOiTS M/A I Q( I Gil I JfiN

~I OAf': :lt.SCNI>'llr'N ~

- - - - - .. - - -"'"''""""'"J:-~' ,...-~ 1C+0>0 '""' ""'"''"" """" "'""'""' ~ : "''~ -""'"' .. - .. ~.. _,..,. """""~

, _ . - : T- -::~ ~ ___ --: - ------ --. --- -c;;,;:; ;;-------0 ~~ '

14 ::a (_!...~~ ~-~ ....,._ 10+00

Jloil ' ' 09 'YEAlt npipqzao

:...~ -y' ____.DG!iTIMGfi'RDPOSED

r """'"'"' ----=. ...............

·-- .......... ---~-

__::;>------ lt'H' "--- . -•r-'C-- -- -------1 "---srm. ~ C.ICIS'TM IC li'I;E; -~- ---

_-rJP0....-1150 __

,;;

la,sosW£LL-t.Nl>!Ntt.t<~ - ~URVEY~S - PLANNERS - SCIENTISTS

J,.lO PHIUJJ"$ A\OAJ(, SOU-n-1 HA0<£NSACK. lf.J. !}7608 m_ (2ot) 541-ono • F"A){ (201) 64t-ID31 1t.J.C£Rl'I'J':oi\'110FNJ1HOft!ZA'll(»tN0l<fCAZ~

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

!.ffiENQ TW. JQP Of" WAU. lii.H.HW. W,AHftiQHERtlDtWAlER tULW. u£,t,N NIGH WA'tVt W.LI'I W£Mihtf11AlER N~J..W KNilQIIIIIEJI LDW W<IIIVI

JOHN R. VALENTIN

~-~-

~t:M(JN(E'RliYIJC;.0)51122

.,,

.,

1-12

- - -

GRAPHlC SC.W:

~.i;i-o" j i ,!,!~) ....

REP AIR OF COUAPSED BULKHEAD sECTION AlONG BYRAM RIVER

CROSS SECTIONS -5 VIH .. AG[ ::f" P~~ C-i(SltN

.-tSTCMCSTN <CUr.TY NEW~

---:!'':'' !=!."~ I -~~I ::.::1.:;::;.. , ... ~ 15-192 -·16 •26

-

- - - - - - - - - -

'-·

liP EL.-11.0

-' !2·

- - - -190lf68 npoouoo

-'-t;!;r""':!!--~ .. -~~-··

i -~·

'

.-~.!!~-~...:. --·~--- _: ~~-

100 !(M 11Q!pf2 go

~·--. -- .:_j.-.;J.i ~~t~BmU~(

.--""lt.t.2L·--

........... II£AM HIQER ..oM WAlDI

W.HW \I(AN)«Jo. W...TDI IU.'6'.. !«AN LOW lUoTDt I.U..LW. III(Mft.tMiet I..CWW.l'!R

STEPHEN T BOSWELL JOHN R VALENTIN

- - -

__ j__ ---

• j

·t· ---~-..

-!

- _j

---l I

cRAPHlc seAL£

~~~-~--5~~~~·---zi~~~i t lll'l'ar)

·--~~~ tl.

REPAIR OF COLLAPSEO EiUlt<;HEAO stCllON ALONG BYRAM RI\IER

CROSS SECTIONS -6 VI....L.AGf Of CIQOTIT CHC!51;::;:t

o'I(SfCH£S1(R COIJH;{'t

-~15-192

-

- .. - - -

-~~0

·""<!.~

- -pusrw.c~

""""'"' --~.

!OO!fAJ!A,090tJ200

OISTI!tG/PWO'ORU ...........

-

.._i;\11A-QQ l!XlltN!DWlll"'

~~ .... :_\ ,...., """"'.:"""""" __ _

~••u-- ~__:::..,__ _......!

~'ilii'il!=rn --- - .• --~~Ml>~ ---~= -

,..(1.-t(l.O

- -

6C-10

,.,·-"'

~o l,_o~~~~~~~~=-,;----r~·,~,- Gil l.ftV ~e~~waL-~UII'K..c.n~ - SURVEYORS - Pu.NNERS - SOENTlSTS

.3.30 PHt.UPS AvENUE. SOUTH ~. H.J. 07105

~~~t;D~~:~,i,.~~

- - - - -t&!·

"' ' .:

•I

-t~r·

-''#L ··-_.,,

_., ...

'b+OO ...... l.. """"""' ---~ ::?"';'~ ~..:..-:.-·; .. ~- - -- ~-~\,r-- _:::::._ _.,.,.... IIC~::_t'-..

N['ll "AAUitG\115.1 50

N€J, - '"":,--IQij! YFHf f!OM:)?QO """""""'-~ .. ~~

1------~-- :Irt.A.D

~4~-o-

""""""""' """'""'

""-"cl!Jt ~· ~:s~rbl .. ; : ' DRu£0 3-IAFT

; : ~ ! I ~ -' I 0 ;-·t11$11NGIW ROQ(

i:! ~·~

~-O'"Df.l.-11 I)RJULOstW'T ••

'

., '

--!

j .,

~ ... ..--

. ~-

W.IOl.W. lEAH tCMER MO-l WillER ILI(W. liltMIItiQI WAfOI lo!LW loltMf lOWWt.'JBI w.LUt. t,l["lofiUN(Jtl.OIII'.,_lER

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL JOlL"' R. VALENTIN

_)(?[~~-- --

~tffGNQ:ItN.TL)C..C.7UID "110ftJ$'11'Jffli_[NGUIIWIII II..Y UC. (ll$f2Z

- - -

. .-"

--- oo·:i.li

GRAPffiC SCIJ..E

~ - ~ i .... t ----~ " ,!,.:!':}1'.

R!PAIR OF COLLAPSED 9\JLKHEAO SEC110N ALONG BYRAM RIVER

CROSS SECTIONS -7 V<I...LlGC cr F'\JQT CHrSTER

'Nl~'D<!tllR C.().RITY

-~15-192

-

I I I I { I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

~·~·~ I w~p~ ~ i ~ ~a -~~ ~il ~sj~i! •• ~

~g~ it ~i §h ~~ H~g i 6 ri! I :sh ~~ iii .e . ~i ., 6 !

iii;!• n 1u "" g' *- •• g~i·ia ·i g. ~r ~~ w'! r .... -· ,,. -~ ~~ ~ i ~!~~h~ ~~ wh~ r ~ ~ h . .. . nm~ i: m; " .

~ I!

~· 2

z

~ r

~ 0 ....

I I


J ~ il

- i

~

j

I ! H

f J ~ ·' ! ~

I

L~---11 ~ () 1

1

"' " fu 0:

z

\ ~ z

~ I

i ~ I z

~. i :X: 0 ...,

::l ~ 0 IIl

~ I z .. I :I:

Q.. r.l E--(/)

• ~ -~ ~b i;

I !l

I I

i I ~

I [z ' I ~~

i ~

! I

I

~ oi z,

- - - - - - -I

1:r'-e·

i ......

WAlKWAY

1-----_::.";:;·•:..·, ""'lOtS~~~--' ! I

--~

1-12-tt"W.U

-----~ J -----~--~

r s tft ra!iQI

d. !L /X.!

(" = = = = < ''"

= ~ ~.t;::'~- ~ 11 /-

~

I

::\:: 0\ICfQ.I>!PIIlRtr

= lt:CUN: TOQ£~ - -- I - ~ --+- I I I

~ \'PM'!?"' I\' IIQWf!i

PLAN OF"'~ f;J. ~~ARDWALK

- - -

SUPPORT STEEl FRAMING SCIU.L.l/'4"•'"-D"'

lJO PHilUPS A\I£NU£. SOUTrl t'l.t.CI<Dffi,t.O.. N..J. 07&06 lR (201) 6o&I-077il • tAX, {20l} 641-11!1)1

- - -

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

- - -

I I !

"'' !i ~~

-

II' OIA. 'f'lRI'ORATd:l PlPt: !

2:-dCI'lUSHai'S~T-WRII.PPED ~ GEOlEJCtU :

I !

CONCRETE RETAINING WALL SE)::TIONS

SC&t J/8 .. ,.-a"

''r I!.::<C.

STEP FOOTING DETAIL seALt tfl' .. 1 rr

-

JOHN R. VALENTIN REPAIR Of COll.APSEO BULKHEAO SECTION At.ONG B"''R-'M RIVER

DETAILS-2

-

- -~

i

- - - -

STEP$ DETAIL $tM.C• 1/t'ai'-CJ'

S\.OK :~sPOt rQ01 I

/ I .. CiFIINitEll ACOI~DX£ I I /iOIW>INQ.L.~"P&'\01

1-t/t" I:XN"ot.C'IUI $M'ID-' liiiJX)( (.c"118"o2-J/I', 8000 PSI) t!lo£1JHC CCOR:iiiE M APPRO'IE!) E.QliM. CDLOR TO

D[SEJ.[.t1ti)8TJH[O'IIoi[Jt

NOlE. LEAliE 2.-1/4' I1IOW TOP CX" U\'ELMG c:ouASE TO f'NSI-I GIWlE. f'V.C[ 8l..fXt(. T~ AMD 'II&RA'It BI.OCK TO~ GIIADE. fAt1(1'\J. tii'IH SAHO tcnUtt IIL.OCCS 1010 llfi:Cl.IT OR ORT WO: TO "t.N.lO llnwtllrf ll.OCKS.

CONCREif PAVER SIDEWALK Nts:

- - - - -

{~~' '::.'''' :£:2,--

..,--

1(.2"DI4. Glll\1Nttl£01R01t ....., ..

WAI KWAY _fi~IUNG RETAIL

I .4

;:r~·~:~.:; i ~ ~ ; . ~~~··-:~~

""-CIIIJ'SHai:PQM(7~CDI.tl'lot'll"05Ul'ICili'o.OE

CONCREJ}; ,SIDEWALK

- - - - - -lg IBJ ·---1 - ·~. - .,...,_,_____.

! ~~~=~ii~~~ !tJI/YI,J/t'~IIO(!I)I:I:liSI'IVIIIU

....,.. 0 ,_

o•-L~6-~ I f =~~- BENCH [DuM or~ tnc. • 1 t L!::' IDift-......Pl ....... C

t-1"

r~ ""' SQ.Nf-f>OMIIED TUSH COWI"olc;1tllt MI!HiF"~eviiOif.LLYOit~t:~

SOLAR POWERED JRASH COMPACTOR

SCALE 1/'r•1"..(f'

flE!jCH DETAIL ., ..

CONCRETE JR .fl.SH RECEPtACLE

-

I_ BosWELL ENOI&RINCI

STEPHEN T BOSWELL JOHN R. VALENTIN REPAIR Of COLLAPSED BULKHEAO SECllON ALONG SYRAJ.t RIVER - - . . . . - - --- -- ----

~ I I I I I I I - "~ ~,. --~-. -·~ ··--·~ ..... ···-No Ol.lt I O£.$CRIP'I"JON.0:8 .... ":"~ ~C:U~ m..; (201) 4•~-0770 4 FIIK: (201) 64t-18ll UIIIJO' ........... ...,. ..... ~QlJ!!:! • »... N.J c:arnriCAI( Of'

PIIOf'D3(IICAI. £1i1a1NEEA N..T. UC. 081010

DETA!l.S-3 VI~C£ ~ PORO •::..,t'i!Eii. ,;xi (.~.5:.·----·-

PAOFf;$!IONAI. tiKDlEift lf'f UC. OmM

-

- - - -

t ~-11 lt!GB fiUI NYSDf:C CCJir4CHT$

NO DA tr DI:St:Rif> TION

/

-

/ /

/

/ /

- - -

/

/ /

.. / ~:

/

-

/ /

-

. _____________ -:;·..=..::::--===-:.o:-:=-.::-:::;-==~

BR!DG[ W£ST ELEVA T!ON tt.T.S..

- - -

STEPHEN T BOSWELL

- - - -l.~$Jifmt;"-BCJ:K

2008 f!VSDOT STANOARO SPEQFICA.l!Cifi f'OII RDIIoO AND 8RIDCE ~~WOOIAEPaTltlt$l.JI'I"'..:NDtTMT511'1.tJ'lCA'ftONS

l P'REF'MfiiC.Uto 1JII!Oe[ $HAU. 8E: A (;OIIl"'t€MT~ ftEll£S11111.-N B111tK0E SYSI(lol AS QI£52CNfD, OCTAII.£U. A110 SI.I""L'fll 111' CONTWt ~ WU!li(W!, U.C. OR APPAO\o£D [QWL mE OOHtl"..t.CtoA. 'SH.U. !U81o11T SHCI" DRA!IIItec:s AND SPEDRCA"ADHS Rll'l 'Q£ ~N'PROVI!I....

< ""'-""'l.. P£D£S'ntiAN LM: LOAO., t:; UI/SF )9(11;\LUV£ Lo.t.O ... ~~ 1.8

Sa..itn'lt0£:2GJI':S~ .._ DiJII:II't 1XM"Rt"SSnot: S1li(NOTIIS (fc:) ~" ~·- •.ooo PSI a....ss a ___ .s,ooo pg

ll,a..,t.ZW:~S111(MGTH$..{1N~WI!HTAIIU 903..Dl.Oii-JOFJ111:N..DOTSTANIJAfltl~b)<l$)

Q..I.SSA __ 4,&rot>SI

~~ ---l.100PS

f. !!ONf"QQI!D!Qf! 5JfD A5n.l1161311(~60i

~ ~~TSCAT ~$ NtO IIE.IJINOANC:HCfl80Lt DETALSSMAU.·~·VliCC:OrtrltAClOflNdl~ IUIMJtACMIUt t'tnal!: TI)(X)NSlftvtl'IOII..

l. (JCPOSal ctJRNERS 5HIIU. liA'I£ A 3/lo IHOf OV.UFOI UtiL£SS OntEJIIIIISI: HO'lRl

1Q. 8iUDCE SlU\.StlAU..etf",t,JNlUllflllli'IA ~-eon.srt71)1 CCLOII.m Bt:~lln'TI1l0Mel

-

JOHN R. VALENTIK REPAIR OF CDU.APSED BUL.KHEAD SECTION ALONG BYRAM RIVER

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE G£NERAL PlAN AND ElEVATION \IIUACf !Y PORT CHEST£~

-

- - - - - - - - -

II II

! i 'I II II II '! II II II i I II II ! I II ~ ! II ; I II f I I; II 'I I i II II II I II JL-'-~-- .l L)_Lj_l_J_

NORTH ABI)TMENT ELEVATION SCAl£. 1/C " 1·-o=

-- ---~__:~------ _________ ,

- - - - - -

r-----------1_!_-4"'·-------9:\!!!!!!'c'fl ~ ,._,,. ..

!

~·12"

I I I.

ll I ! I ' I i I I I j ! I I I I ! I I I I ' I I i I I I I I ' I ' I I I ' I I I ; I I i I . ' I I I I I I I i I

SlttL'SHtt'rPLE .___j_ ___ .n:p_ - .,_, -

I I I I I I I ' ; I I I I I I I I I I I : I __ lJ _.,.;

~Q!.!lli 8~~~~~.ll.EYA TION

STEPHEN T BOSWELL JOHN R VALENTIN

- - -

f'OAII:ENDI"LNCmS.I!(J(JI.TOSHttfltOt .t.D.IJ1T COfiii.1..MlE BAA SP,\OHQ _.5 Rtotiii!EP ~T BRC1it SO.t TO Q.£AA BEAU MotOR DOMl.S.

3 CHAWRRAU.ElcPaiEDCOIICAETtEOOESK'" UMLSS HOlED 0111ER*SE

e aUI!fiG S{.Al" [UW.'PON IS APf'ROlaloi,U[ (lW;1 D.£VA.llQN~81EvoaFlfDt.I'CJMSUIIM~ OF 8RIOQ( AND IIU.IIHO OOIIU.

REPAIR OF COLLAPSED BULKHEAD SECTION ALONG BYRAM RIVER

BRIDGE ABUlMENT DETAILS \llu..AG[ Of POR'T CHESTER'

1\'lSH:'"'i:.SJ(ft {;OI.JNT\' NtW v:lRK

:::~:«~~;_;~~ ~-•t e';.~ -~ 15-192 -·25 •26

-

- - - - - -~\

~~:.~~~ -~

~~-~~~:

:.f '' It

cl ~

-

_,. _f..·

- -

,;-'

./

'lYRAM RivER

/

/ .;:,.._,

s ::::;_-~._,.,: -t-.

--- -~~1 _. ___ :::~· ~

r': :~:J; ~:~-; ... " ' ' -,

. ,,\

,.,'

'< .,

.-•:-./

'>,

-

;. .

'~ "·

---

- -

.,....;: '/ ~·

·~-

' I ~.

~~:~--;_t::_:.-~-~

rJ;: " ,~,c--., • ,v '·

~:..~:~:,;.

'> \-

c.'{~ .. ·

\\~~~~· ~~~-...

?

'

-

" ,.:'- ~,

~ '··-1'?-~;~

"'~t-..,tr',

~ .. ;.:-"-

'

·-~

sc.r.L.£! M1.S.

' ' +~ '~ .. ,,

,o<~'

l,~ .. ELL-,_, • ...,.,,~~ - ~URVEVORS - PLANNERS - SOENTlSTS

.l30 PHIU.JPS A\I{)IU£. SOUlH ~ N.J. 07606

~~ ~~:1;.0~:; J:li!~

·, /1'~·

STEPHEN T. BOSWELL

PROfD'SIClNAL. tMINf~ N. Y IJC, OIT0\0

- -

/

- - -

--

~ I ftlet aNEJ!Al MOltS. m 51«1 t.

2. f'Olii.£CEHD,!.F;E!ii1Ettl.

l.. fDII Sl.T CURJA#rl 0[1.-,u. S£1 swttr 22..

4 II' 1'tlt .a:nc Nft.J.rtMOliSOLATEil.OS SHO'Wi.lHE WCifiK IIU<JWiolliW-u,.HA"" "10 U\lt£PlAa:8C'l'IIEDI 10/t-1)1/t~ 10 PIIO'Itef MnOR 1'\,0UIIC)[R sPA.liiNINC, SIJW~Qi Sf'A~ fi3H PlD£3. AND m I.IIQ'CA'nOH.

TYPICA* IN WATFR aarf.i!'JVfDON CQNf!GtJRATION

JOHN R. VALENTIN

~c:_-~, -

~DIGHEEiil "-" ~c'~

REPAIR OF COllAPSED BULI<HE.&.D SECTION ALONC BYRAM RIVER

BARGE STAGING PLAN

-

BosweLL - dos.ny.gov · APR $ 0 20tg rrySDOS Planning & Development Re: US Army Corps of Engineers...

Documents

Transcript of BosweLL - dos.ny.gov · APR $ 0 20tg rrySDOS Planning & Development Re: US Army Corps of Engineers...