Bosch Project

33
ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF POWER FACTOR AT BOSCH SHOP FLOOR BY INSTALLING CAPACITOR BANK BY External Guide Lingaraju.Ky(Sptd.Eng) P.Sreelekha Internal Guide Akash Roy A.M.Leela(Asct.Professor) Sunith Kumar.A

Transcript of Bosch Project

Page 1: Bosch Project

ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF POWER FACTOR AT BOSCH SHOP FLOOR BY

INSTALLING CAPACITOR BANK

BY External Guide

Lingaraju.Ky(Sptd.Eng)

P.Sreelekha Internal Guide

Akash Roy A.M.Leela(Asct.Professor)

Sunith Kumar.A

Page 2: Bosch Project

SCOPE

Introduction to Problem Definition.Possible Solutions & Remedy Chosen. Present Situation & Conclusion.

Page 3: Bosch Project

Terminologies Power Triangle

Page 4: Bosch Project

Terminologies

Power Factor:

Cosine of the angle between the voltage & the current.

Types of Power Factor:• Unity• Lagging• Leading

Page 5: Bosch Project

Causes for Low Power Factor

Most A.C motors are of induction type having low lagging power factor.

Magnetizing current drawn by transformers lead to lagging current at low loads(specially during morning & evening).

Typical characteristics of Arc lamp in Cinema Induction furnace ,Short transmission lines.

Current limiting reactors used to minimize fault currents work at low power factor.

Page 6: Bosch Project

Disadvantages of Low Power Factor

Large KVA rating of equipment .Greater conductor size .Large copper losses .Poor voltage regulation .Reduced handling capacity of system.Unnecessary penalty is imposed (during

billing).

Page 7: Bosch Project

Different PF Correction Methods Available

Reduce the amount of reactive energy.Compensate artificially for the consumption

of reactive energy. ROTARY EQUIPMENT STATIC CAPACITORS

Page 8: Bosch Project

Remedy Chosen

STATIC CAPACITORS

Page 9: Bosch Project

Specification of the Capacitors

Page 10: Bosch Project

Specification of the Capacitors

Page 11: Bosch Project

Capacitors

Page 12: Bosch Project

Advantages Of Capacitors Over Other Method(s)

Capacitor banks ensures very low initial cost.

The running costs are minimal and they can be used with the same high efficiency on all sizes of installation.

Compact, reliable, highly efficient & convenient to install .

Page 13: Bosch Project

Present Situation At BOSCH

Page 14: Bosch Project

Present Situation At BOSCH

Page 15: Bosch Project

Procedure Followed• Calculations

Page 16: Bosch Project

Procedure Followed

Page 17: Bosch Project

Procedure Followed

Page 18: Bosch Project

Procurement List

Page 19: Bosch Project

Procurement List

Page 20: Bosch Project

Brief Installation List

,

Page 21: Bosch Project

Brief Installation List

,

Page 22: Bosch Project

Savings in Power

• Resistance of the cable 0.15ohm / km load ; Length= 175mt.• Resistance of the cable = 0.15 *0.175km = 0.026 ohm.

• P= √3 *VL*IL* Cos Φ1

• Current drawn by the load at 0.763 P.F , IL1= P/ (√3 *VL*Cos Φ1 )

=171.83/( √3 *430.52*0.763)

=302.009A.

• PF after correction Cos Φ2 = 0.96

• Current drawn by the load at 0.96 P.F , IL2 = P/ ( √3 *VL*Cos Φ2 )

= 171.83/( √3*430.52*0.96)

= 240.03A.

Page 23: Bosch Project

Savings in Power

• Power loss P1= 3*I12R = 7.114KW

• Power loss P2= 3*I22R = 4.493KW

• Saving in power = 7.114KW – 4.493KW = 2.621KW.• Time= 18Hours * 25 Days = 450.• KWh loss in P1 = 3201.3KWh.• KWh loss in P2 = 2021.85KWh.• Reduction in KWh (units) = 1179.45• Cost saving = 1179.45 *12 months * Rs. 6/-unit =

RS.84920.4

Page 24: Bosch Project

Installation Work

Page 25: Bosch Project

Single Line Diagram

Page 26: Bosch Project

Installation Work

Monday

Tuesday

Wedesd

ay

Thursday

Friday

Satu

rday

Sunday

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.57 0.54 0.54 0.6 0.550.67

0.575

0.94 0.93 0.93 0.96 0.90.98 0.93

Feeder 307

BeforeAfter

Page 27: Bosch Project

Installation Work

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesd

ay

Thursday

Friday

Satu

rday

Sunday

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

0.6820.7070000000000

010.673000000000002

0.7070000000000010.698 0.6670000000000

020.6680000000000

02

0.90.9500000000000

010.90.9500000000000

010.92 0.92 0.92

Feeder 504

BeforeAfter

Page 28: Bosch Project

,

106 307 312 402 501 415 504 505 5110

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0.650.57

0.8090.73

0.82 0.86

0.70.78 0.736

0.320.37

0.120.22

0.1 0.050.23 0.1 0.174

Previous Improvement

Page 29: Bosch Project

ALGORITHM • Identify the feeder to be worked based on the

difference of power factor• p= Power in KW• a= Power factor(current) • b= Target power factor • Find out the Reactive power Compensation required

for achieving target power factor• Compare the current and targeted P.F• Improvement done is displayed

Simulation using MATLAB

Page 30: Bosch Project

FLOW CHART

Page 31: Bosch Project

FLOW CHART

Page 32: Bosch Project

CONCLUSION

• Improved the power factor from the range of 0.65-0.85 to an existing range of 0.95-0.99 effectively.

• Significant decline in the rating of current flow & reduced I2R losses also leading to reduced stress on the cable there by increased durability of the cable.

• Finally reduced on the KVA demand there by reducing the penalty imposed ,also the total KWh consumption as a whole has been reduced. Thus

creating savings of 27.5lakhs p.a

Page 33: Bosch Project

THANK YOU