Application of QuickField Software to Heat Transfer Problems i j k By Dr. Evgeni Volpov.
Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity
description
Transcript of Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity
Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski
Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity
• 200 PMTs were measured ( box2, box3, box4, box6 ).
• Only one PMT ( LA0007 ) was found to exceed the linearity limits at 104 gain in box2.
• For other boxes all measurements are present below for comparison.
-3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
2%0%-2%10000500001000000
Linearity test of PMTs from box 3
NONLINEARITY (%) RATE EFFECT (%)
N PMT G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3
5 LA0166 ,24 -,69 -2,2 ,86 -,41 -,43
48 ZL2600 ,6 ,9 2,1 ,33 ,32 -,55
50 ZL2606 -,5 -,5 -2,2 -,56 ,7 ,64
-3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
2%0%-2%10000500001000000
Linearity test of PMTs from box 4
-3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
2%0%-2%10000500001000000
Linearity test of PMTs from box 6
NONLINEARITY (%) RATE EFFECT (%)
N PMT G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3
11 LA0109 -2,4 -1,5 1,4 ,41 ,2 -,65
26 LA0686 -1,8 2,3 2,3 -,71 -,47 -,61
35 LA0709 1,7 2,4 -2,7 1 1 -1,1
-3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
2%
0
-2%
10000
50000
1000000
Rate effect test of PMTs from box 3
-3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
2%
0
-2%
10000
50000
1000000
Rate effect test of PMTs from box 4
-3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
2%
0
-2%
10000
50000
1000000
Rate effect test of PMTs from box 6
NONLINEARITY (%) RATE EFFECT (%)
N PMT G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3
34 LA0707 ,73 ,7 1,4 -2,5 1,8 -1,9
45 LA0736 -,44 -1,4 -1,8 -1,2 -1,5 -2,3
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
1%
0%
-1%
10000
50000
1000000
Stability test of PMTs from box 3
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
1%
0%
-1%
10000
50000
1000000
Stability test of PMTs from box 4
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
1%
0%
-1%
10000
50000
1000000
Stability test of PMTs from box 6
Conclusions
1. 9 PMTs from 200 measured were found to exceed the linearity or rate effect limits.
2. From 9 bad tubes (8 of them were measured by Bernard) 3 PMTs are present in the LAL list of bad PMTs.
3. Only 2 PMTs ( LA0007, LA0109 ) has nonlinearity more 2 % at the gain 104 that was measured HAMAMATSU:
NONLINEARITY (%) RATE EFFECT (%)
PMT G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3
box2 LA0007 -2,3 -1,7 -1,3 ,66 ,76 -,5
box6 LA0109 -2,4 -1,5 1,4 ,41 ,2 -,65
4. For other 7 PMTs nonlinearity and rate effect exceed 2% level at higher gains (not measured by HAMAMATSU).