Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

11
Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity 200 PMTs were measured ( box2, box3, box4, box6 ). Only one PMT ( LA0007 ) was found to exceed the linearity limits at 10 4 gain in box2. For other boxes all measurements are present below for comparison.

description

Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity 200 PMTs were measured ( box2, box3, box4, box6 ). Only one PMT ( LA0007 ) was found to exceed the linearity limits at 10 4 gain in box2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

Page 1: Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski

Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

• 200 PMTs were measured ( box2, box3, box4, box6 ).

• Only one PMT ( LA0007 ) was found to exceed the linearity limits at 104 gain in box2.

• For other boxes all measurements are present below for comparison.

Page 2: Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

-3

-2,5

-2

-1,5

-1

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

2%0%-2%10000500001000000

Linearity test of PMTs from box 3

NONLINEARITY (%) RATE EFFECT (%)

N PMT G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3

5 LA0166 ,24 -,69 -2,2 ,86 -,41 -,43

48 ZL2600 ,6 ,9 2,1 ,33 ,32 -,55

50 ZL2606 -,5 -,5 -2,2 -,56 ,7 ,64

Page 3: Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

-3

-2,5

-2

-1,5

-1

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

2%0%-2%10000500001000000

Linearity test of PMTs from box 4

Page 4: Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

-3

-2,5

-2

-1,5

-1

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

2%0%-2%10000500001000000

Linearity test of PMTs from box 6

NONLINEARITY (%) RATE EFFECT (%)

N PMT G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3

11 LA0109 -2,4 -1,5 1,4 ,41 ,2 -,65

26 LA0686 -1,8 2,3 2,3 -,71 -,47 -,61

35 LA0709 1,7 2,4 -2,7 1 1 -1,1

Page 5: Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

-3

-2,5

-2

-1,5

-1

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

2%

0

-2%

10000

50000

1000000

Rate effect test of PMTs from box 3

Page 6: Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

-3

-2,5

-2

-1,5

-1

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

2%

0

-2%

10000

50000

1000000

Rate effect test of PMTs from box 4

Page 7: Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

-3

-2,5

-2

-1,5

-1

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

2%

0

-2%

10000

50000

1000000

Rate effect test of PMTs from box 6

NONLINEARITY (%) RATE EFFECT (%)

N PMT G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3

34 LA0707 ,73 ,7 1,4 -2,5 1,8 -1,9

45 LA0736 -,44 -1,4 -1,8 -1,2 -1,5 -2,3

Page 8: Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

-1,5

-1

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

1%

0%

-1%

10000

50000

1000000

Stability test of PMTs from box 3

Page 9: Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

-1,5

-1

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

1%

0%

-1%

10000

50000

1000000

Stability test of PMTs from box 4

Page 10: Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

-1,5

-1

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

1%

0%

-1%

10000

50000

1000000

Stability test of PMTs from box 6

Page 11: Boris Bobchenko, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya and Evgeni Tarkovski Status of ITEP PMT test bench activity

Conclusions

1. 9 PMTs from 200 measured were found to exceed the linearity or rate effect limits.

2. From 9 bad tubes (8 of them were measured by Bernard) 3 PMTs are present in the LAL list of bad PMTs.

3. Only 2 PMTs ( LA0007, LA0109 ) has nonlinearity more 2 % at the gain 104 that was measured HAMAMATSU:

NONLINEARITY (%) RATE EFFECT (%)

PMT G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3

box2 LA0007 -2,3 -1,7 -1,3 ,66 ,76 -,5

box6 LA0109 -2,4 -1,5 1,4 ,41 ,2 -,65

4. For other 7 PMTs nonlinearity and rate effect exceed 2% level at higher gains (not measured by HAMAMATSU).