Bomas 1997 Materials Science and Engineering A

download Bomas 1997 Materials Science and Engineering A

of 4

Transcript of Bomas 1997 Materials Science and Engineering A

  • 8/12/2019 Bomas 1997 Materials Science and Engineering A

    1/4

    ELSEVIER

    Materials Scienc e and Engineering A234G236 (1997) 393-396

    Calculation method for the fatigue limit of parts of case hardened

    steels

    H. Bomas *, P. Mayr, M. Schleicher

    Stiftung Institut fir Werkstofftechnik, Badgasteiner StraJe 3, D-28359 Bremen, Germany

    Received 31 January 1997

    Abstract

    Based on the weakest link concept a method is developed, from which the surv ival probability of every surface and volume

    element of a case hardened part, which is loaded near the fatigue limit, can be calculated. Prerequisite of the calculation is the

    knowledge of the hardness and residual stress distribution, the surface roughness, and the surface oxidation depth. By

    multiplication of the surv ival probabilities of neighboured elements the surv ival probability of a limited region or of the whole

    part can be calculated, which includes a fatigue limit determination. It is shown, that this method can be applied successful ly to

    unnotched specimens o f case hardened steels. The necessary calculation parameters can be gained from a set of reference parts.

    Because of the possibil ity to formulate a surv ival probability for every volume and surface element, there are no geometrical

    restrictions to the parts which shall be calculated. 0 1997 Elsevier Science S.A.

    Keywords: Case hardening; Fatigue limit; Calculation; Weakest link concept

    1. Introduction

    The here presented calculation method for the fatigue

    limit of parts of case hardened steel is based on the

    weakest link concept which was developed by Weibull

    [l] for the strength of brittle materials and later trans-

    ferred to fatigue behaviour by Heckel and co-workers

    [2-61. The principles of this concept were also applied

    to the calculation of the fatigue limit of homogeneous

    materials by several other authors [7-lo]. Only a few

    people showed the physical nature of the weakest links

    and the correlation between their size distribution and

    the fracture probability [ll]. The application of the

    weakest link concept to inhomogeneous materials like

    case hardened steel is new and needs additional devel-

    opments considering different crack initiation mecha-

    nisms and the role of local strength and residual

    stresses.

    * Corresponding author. Tel.: + 49 421 2185350; fax: + 49 421

    2185333; e-mail [email protected]

    0921-5093/97/ 17.00 0 1997 Elsevier Scienc e S.A. All rights reserved.

    PIISO921-5093(97)00159-7

    2. Calculation principles

    The failure of casehardened parts under loading near

    the fatigue limit is a problem of crack initiation. This is

    the condition under which the weakest link concept can

    be applied to describe fatigue failure. Two main sites of

    fatigue crack initiation and different reasons have to be

    considered in case hardened parts:

    l

    crack initiation at the surface A) due to surface

    roughness R) or due to surface oxidation SO)

    l

    crack initiation in the volume v>

    According to the rules of probability mathematics,

    the survival probability P, of a case hardened part can

    be calculated as the product of the survival probabili-

    ties of the surface P, A) and the volume P, V):

    ps = Ps A).Ps V 1)

    The weakest link concept is based on the assumption

    that material strength is determined by bulk or surface

    imperfections which are equally distributed in the

    stressed egion. Fracture is caused by the weakest link,

    which means the worst imperfection with respect to

    crack initiation. Thus, the fracture probability near the

  • 8/12/2019 Bomas 1997 Materials Science and Engineering A

    2/4

  • 8/12/2019 Bomas 1997 Materials Science and Engineering A

    3/4

    H. Bomas et al. /Materials Scienc e and Engineering A234-236 (1997) 393-396 395

    400 600 800 1000

    Measured Fatigue Limit [N/mm21

    1200

    Fig. 1. Measured and calculated fatigue limits o f case hardened,

    unnotched specim ens under rotating bending, push-pull and plane

    bending.

    ized by an equivalent short or long crack, depending on

    its depth xso and a fit parameter x0. Considering this, a

    factor Yso after Topper and El Haddad [16] is used to

    describe the effect of surface oxida tion:

    y,,= x,

    J---

    x0 + Go

    (12)

    The Weibull exponents

    mA and m, are determined by

    reference specimens.

    By multiplication of the survival probabilities of

    neighboured elements, the survival probability of lim-

    ited regions or of the whole part can be calculated. The

    fatigue limit is the nominal stress amplitude with the

    total survival probability 0.5.

    3. Application to unnotched, case hardened specimens

    In order to study the described method with easy

    calculations procedures, it was applied to unnotched,

    case hardened specimens of two steel grades under

    rotating bending RB), plane bending PB), and push-

    pull loading PP) including different mean stressesand

    different case hardening processes. Table 1 shows the

    most important data of the examined specimens rom

    the steels 16MnCr5 and 16MnCrS5 steels for case

    hardening after German standard DIN 17 210), which

    have partially been published before.

    The specimens of charge I are cylindric with a net

    diameter of 6 mm. The material is 16MnCrS5. The

    specimensA and X were chosen as reference becauseA

    exhibits crack initiation at the surface and X shows

    crack initiation in the volume. The specimensof charge

    II [17] are also cylindric with a net diameter of 12 mm.

    The material is 16MnCr5. The specimensof charge III

    [18] are bars with rectangular cross section and were

    loaded by plane bending with a stress atio R = 0. The

    bending height is 17 mm. Specimen H2 was taken as

    additional reference in order to determine the parame-

    ter Ho describing the mean stresssensitivity. The speci-

    mens of charge IV [19] are cylindric with a net diameter

    of 12 mm. The steel is 16MnCrS5.

    The hardness and residual stress distribution of all

    specimens is known, so that the survival probability

    could be calculated. The calculation parameters de-

    scribed in chapter 2 were optimized until the calculated

    and measured fatigue limits of the reference specimens

    were identical. Table 2 shows the optimized parameters,

    which were used to calculate the fatigue limits shown in

    Table 1 and Fig. 1. It can be seen, that the involved

    effects on the fatigue limit of the examined unnotched

    specimens, concerning their manufacturing, geometry,

    and loading, are well described by the presented calcu-

    lation method. Further work will show the applicability

    of this method to notched specimens.

    References

    [l] W. Weib ull, Ingenieur-Archiv 28 (1959) 360-362.

    [2] J. Biihm, K. Heckel, Z eitschrift fur Werkstofftechnik 13 (1982)

    120- 128.

    [3] K. Heckel, J. Kiihler, Zeitschrift fiir Werkstofftechnik 6 (1975)

    52-54.

    [4] C Kra, Beschreibung des Lebensdauerverhaltens gekerbter

    Proben unter Betriebsbelastung auf der Bas is des statistische n

    GroBeneinflusses, The sis, Universitat der Bundeswehr, Miinchen,

    1988.

    [5] F. Scholz, Untersuchungen zum statistische n GrBBeneinfluB bei

    mehrachsiger Schwingbeanspruch ung, Fortschritt-Bericht, VDI,

    Reihe 18, Nr. 50, Dusseldorf, VDI-Verlag, 1988.

    [6] G. Schweiger, Statistischer GrdBeneinfluCi bei unregelmLl3iger

    Schwingbeanspruchu ng, The sis, Hochsc hule der Bundeswehr,

    Munchen, 1983.

    [7] R. Kuguel, ASTM Proc. 61 (1961) 732-744.

    [8] J. Liu, H. Zenner, Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik 26

    (1995) 14-51.

    [9] C.M. Sonsino, Konstruktion 45 (1993) 25533.

    [lo] H. Bomas, T. Linkewitz, P. Mayr, F. Jablonski, R. Kienzler, K.

    Kutschan, M. Bather-Hiichst, F. Miihleder, M. Seitter, D.

    Wicke, in: G. Liitjering, H. Nowack (eds.), Fatigue 96, vol. I,

    Pergamon, Oxford, 1996, p. 141-146.

    [ll] H. Bomas, T. Linkewitz, P. Mayr, F. Jablonski, R. Kienzler, K.

    Kutschan, M. Bacher-Hiichst, F. Miihleder, M. Seitter, D.

    Wicke, in: B.L. Karihaloo, Y.-W. Mai, M.I. Ripley, R.O. Ritchie

    (eds.), Advances in Fracture Research, Pergamon, Oxford, 1997,

    pp. 1321-1328.

    [12] K. Dang Van , G. Cailletaud, J.F. Flavenot, A. Le Douaron,

    H.P. Lieurade, in: M.W. Brown and K.J. Miller (eds.), Biaxial

    and Multiaxial Fatigue, EGF 3, Mechanical Engineering Publi-

    cations, London, 1989, pp. 459-478.

    [13] W. Schiitz, Zeitschrift fur Flugwissensc haften 15 (1967) 407-429.

    [14] Y. Murakami, JSME Series I 32 (1989) 167-180.

  • 8/12/2019 Bomas 1997 Materials Science and Engineering A

    4/4

    396 H. Bomas et al. /Materials Scienc e and Engineering A234-236 (1997) 393X396

    [15] A. Melander, S. Preston, Mater. Sci. Forum 1022104 (1992)

    199-210.

    [16] T.H. Topper, M.H. El Haddad, Can. Metall. Q 18 (1979) 207.

    [17] G. Lowisch, H. Bomas, P. Mayr, in: H.P. Rossmanith, K.J.

    Miller (eds.), Mixed Mode Fatigue and Fracture, ESIS Publ. 14

    (1993) 111-124.

    [18] H. Bomas, P. Mayr, Antriebstechnik 27 (1988) 40-45.

    [19] C. Jansen, H. Bomas, P. Mayr, in 28. Tagung des Arbeitskreises

    Bruchvorgange, Deutscher Verband fur Materialforschung und

    -priifung, 1996, pp. 247-256.