BNBC 2017: Evaluation of Seismic Load using Equivalent ......Earthquake force •Inertia force...
Transcript of BNBC 2017: Evaluation of Seismic Load using Equivalent ......Earthquake force •Inertia force...
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 1
74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
BNBC 2017: Evaluation of Seismic Load using Equivalent Static Force Method
Dr. Tahsin Reza Hossain Professor Department of Civil Engineering, BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 2
74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Outline of Lectures • Lecture 1- Seismic loading concept of BNBC 2017; estimation of
seismic loading using equivalent static force method (ESFM) and Computer application
• Lecture 2- Dynamic Analysis as per BNBC 2017, Response spectrum method (RSM) and Time History method (TH), computer applications
• Lecture 3- Seismic design and detailing of concrete structure for IMRF structures with Computer applications
• Lecture 4- Seismic design and detailing of concrete structure for SMRF structures with Computer applications
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 3
74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Lecture 1:
• Basic Philosophy of earthquake resistant design
• Equivalent Static Analysis method as in BNBC 2017 section 2.5.9
• Computer application(ETABS) to design a RC building
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 4
74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
What causes Earthquake?
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 5
74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Earthquake effects
Four basic causes of earthquake damage
• Ground shaking
• Ground failure
• Tsunamis
• Fire
• Our concern is ground shaking
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 6
74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Earthquakes do not kill people, buildings do
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 7
74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Earthquake force
• Inertia force throughout the mass
• Distinctly different from DL, LL, WL
• Reversible force
• Complex, random
• Difficult to predict
• Dynamic
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 8
74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Inertia force and relative motion
• Frame structure
• Inertial force at roof transfer through column
• Larger u larger internal force
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 9
74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Simultaneously in three directions
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 10 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Generation of seismic force
• Inertia force flows through all structural components
• All components need to be sufficiently strong to transmit the force
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 11 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Philosophy of seismic design
11
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 12 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 13 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 14 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Lateral Force Method
• Equivalent Static Force Method
• Dynamic Response Method –Response Spectrum Method
–Time History Method
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 15 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET 15
WR
ZICV
amF
Sir Isaac Newton
1642-1727
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 16 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET 16
Z coefficient and C curve
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 17 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Factor of 2 hidden in old BNBC
17
WR
ZICV
2
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 18 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET 18
Seismic Zoning Map: 1993 and 2017
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 19 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 20 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 21 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Design Earthquake Force, BNBC 2017
sa CR
ZIS
3
2
Spectral Acceleration
0.11
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 22 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Base shear
V = SaW
0.044
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 23 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Vertical Distribution of base shear
V
F1
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
k=1 k >1
k = 1 for structure period 0.5 = 2 for structure period ≥ 2.5s = linear interpolation between 1 and 2 for other periods.
n
i
k
ii
k
xxx
hw
hwVF
1
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 24 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Soil type S TB
(s) TC (s)
TD (s)
SA 1.0 0.15 0.40 2.0
SB 1.2 0.15 0.50 2.0
SC 1.15 0.20 0.60 2.0
SD 1.35 0.20 0.80 2.0
SE 1.4 0.15 0.50 2.0
Site dependent soil factor and other parameters defining elastic response spectrum
0for15.21 BB
s TTT
TSC
TTTSη.C CBs for52
DCC
s TTTT
TSC
for5.2
sec 4for5.22
TT
T
TTSC D
DCs
Normalized acceleration response spectrum, Cs
55.0)5/(10 η
Here is structural damping expressed as a percentage of critical damping.
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 25 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 26 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Seismic Zone
Location Seismic
Intensity
Seismic Zone
Coefficient,
Z 1 Southwestern part
including Barisal, Khulna, Jessore, Rajshahi
Low 0.12
2 Lower Central and Northwestern part including Noakhali, Dhaka, Pabna, Dinajpur, as well as Southwestern corner including Sundarbans
Moderate 0.20
3 Upper Central and Northwestern part including Brahmanbaria, Sirajganj, Rangpur
Severe 0.28
4 Northeastern part including Sylhet, Mymensingh, Kurigram
Very Severe
0.36
Description of Seismic Zones
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 27 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 28 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
The seismic zoning map divides the country into four seismic zones with different expected levels of intensity of ground motion. Each seismic zone has a zone coefficient which provides expected peak ground acceleration values on rock/firm soil corresponding to the maximum considered earthquake (MCE). The design basis earthquake is taken as 2/3 of the maximum considered earthquake.
MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE (MCE): The most severe earthquake ground motion considered by this code.
DESIGN EARTHQUAKE: The earthquake ground motion considered (for normal design) as two-thirds of the corresponding Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE).
The intent of the seismic zoning map is to give an indication of the Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) motion at different parts of the country. In probabilistic terms, the MCE motion may be considered to correspond to having a 2% probability of exceedance within a period of 50 years.
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 29 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Nature of Occupancy
Occupancy Category
Buildings and other structures that represent a low hazard to human life in the event of failure
I
All buildings and other structures except those listed
in Occupancy Categories I, III, and IV
II
Buildings and other structures that represent a substantial hazard to human life in the event of failure, including, but not limited to:
• W here more than 300 people congregate in one area • Daycare facilities with a capacity greater than 150 • S chool facilities with a capacity greater than 250 • C olleges or adult education facilities having more than 500 students. • Health care facilities with a capacity of 50 or more resident patients but nor
surgery facility. • Jails and detention facilities
III
Buildings and other structures designated as essential facilities, including, but not limited to:
• Hospitals and other health care facilities having surgery or emergency treatment facilities
• Fire, rescue, ambulance, and police stations and emergency vehicle garages • Designated earthquake, hurricane, or other emergency shelters • Designated emergency preparedness, communication, and operation
centers and other facilities required for emergency response • Power generating stations and other public utility facilities required in an
emergency • Ancillary structures (including, but not limited to, communication towers,
fuel storage tanks, cooling towers, electrical substation structures, fire water storage tanks or other structures housing or supporting water, or other fire-suppression material or equipment) required for operation of Occupancy Category IV structures during an emergency
IV
Occupancy Category of Buildings and Other Structures
Occupancy Category
Importance factor
I
I or II 1.0
III 1.25
IV 1.5
Importance Factors for Buildings and Structures for Earthquake design
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 30 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Occupancy Category I, II and III Occupancy Category IV
Site Class Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
SA B C C D C D D D
SB B C D D C D D D
SC B C D D C D D D
SD C D D D D D D D
SE, S1, S2 D D D D D D D D
Seismic Design Category of Buildings
Seismic design category controls the building height limit and permissible framing type.
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 31 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Site Class
Description of soil profile up to 30 meters depth
Average Soil Properties in top 30 meters Shear wave velocity 𝑽 𝒔 (m/s)
Standard Penetration Value, 𝑵 (blows/30cm)
Undrained shear strength, 𝑺 𝒖 (kPa)
SA Rock or other rock-like geological formation, including at most 5 m of weaker material at the surface.
> 800 -- --
SB Deposits of very dense sand, gravel, or very stiff clay, at least several tens of metres in thickness, characterised by a gradual increase of mechanical properties with depth.
360 – 800 > 50 > 250
SC Deep deposits of dense or medium dense sand, gravel or stiff clay with thickness from several tens to many hundreds of metres.
180 – 360 15 - 50 70 - 250
SD Deposits of loose-to-medium cohesionless soil (with or without some soft cohesive layers), or of predominantly soft-to-firm cohesive soil.
< 180 < 15 < 70
SE A soil profile consisting of a surface alluvium layer with Vs values of type C or D and thickness varying between about 5 m and 20 m, underlain by stiffer material with Vs > 800 m/s.
-- -- --
Site classification based on soil properties
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 32 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Natural Period mnt hCT
hn = Height of building in metres from foundation or from top of rigid basement. This excludes the basement storeys, where basement walls are connected with the ground floor deck or fitted between the building columns. But it includes the basement storeys, when they are not so connected.
Ct and m are obtained from Table 6.2.20
Structure type Ct m
Concrete moment-resisting frames 0.0466 0.9
Steel moment-resisting frames 0.0724 0.8
Eccentrically braced steel frame 0.0731 0.75
All other structural systems 0.0488 0.75 NOTE: Consider moment resisting frames as frames which resist 100% of seismic force and are not enclosed or adjoined by components that are more rigid and will prevent the frames from deflecting under seismic forces.
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 33 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 34 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 35 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 36 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 37 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 38 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 39 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 40 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 41 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
BNBC 2017 PROVISIONS
1. 1.4D 2. 1.2D + 1.6L 3. 1.2D + (L or 0.8W) 4. 1.2D + 1.6W + L 5. 1.2D + E + L 6. 0.9D + 1.6W 7. 0.9D + E
D = Dead load E = Seismic Load F = Fluid pr. H = Soil pr. L = Live load
Lr = Roof live load R = Rain load T = Thermal load W = Wind load
1. 1.4D 2. 1.2D + 1.6L 3. 1.2D + L 4. 1.2D + 0.8W 5. 1.2D + L + 1.6W 6. 1.2D + L + E 7. 0.9D + 1.6W 8. 0.9D + E
For Typical Building Analysis
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 42 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
RC design in BNBC 2017 is similar to ACI318-2008
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 43 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 44 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 45 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
EXAMPLE: ETABS PROBLEM
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 46 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 47 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
DESIGN SPECIFICATION Dhaka City: Seismic Zone 2, Z=0.2 (Table 2.5.2, 2.5.3) Site Class: SC (Table 2.5.1) Occupancy Category: II (Table1.2.1) Importance Factor: 1 (Table2.5.5) Seismic Design Category: C (Table 2.5.6) Frame Type: Intermediate Moment Frame, R=5 (Section 8.3.3.1)
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 48 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
DESIGN SPECIFICATION Live load: 40psf residential, multi family (Table 2.3.1) Floor finish: 30psf (estimated) Partition wall: 80psf (assumed, estimated) Live load on stair: 100 psf(Table 2.3.1) Number of floors: GF+8 fc’= 3ksi, fy=60ksi
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 49 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 50 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 51 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 52 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
H WX Wxhx^k V
96 582.15 164405 0.209262 52.54357
86 582.15 143499 0.182652 45.86204
76 582.16 123163 0.156767 39.3627
66 582.15 103447.3 0.131672 33.06158
56 582.15 84429.57 0.107466 26.98355
46 582.15 66201.63 0.084264 21.15793
36 582.15 48893.07 0.062233 15.62615
26 582.16 32697.56 0.041619 10.45009
16 582.15 17939.44 0.022834 5.733415
6 105.49 966.7574 0.001231 0.308974
Sum 5344.86 785642.3 1 251.09
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 20 40 60
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 53 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Soil Type Zone-1 Zone-2 Zone-3 Zone-4
SA 0.0121 0.0201 0.0281 0.0362
SB 0.0145 0.0241 0.0338 0.0434
SC 0.0139 0.0231 0.0324 0.0416
SD 0.0163 0.0271 0.0380 0.0488
SE 0.0169 0.0281 0.0394 0.0507
Lower Cut-off: Minimum percentage of load,
V= value x W
Values are 0.06035 times Appendix-C Table- 6.C.4
Note: lower cutoff will NOT work if ASCE 7-02 is
selected in ETABS
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 54 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Upper Cut-off: Maximum percentage of load
V= value x W / R Soil Type Zone-1 Zone-2 Zone-3 Zone-4
SA 0.2000 0.3333 0.4667 0.6000
SB 0.2400 0.4000 0.5600 0.7200
SC 0.2300 0.3833 0.5367 0.6900
SD 0.2700 0.4500 0.6300 0.8100
SE 0.2800 0.4667 0.6533 0.8400
Note: Upper cutoff will WORK if ASCE 7-02 is
selected in ETABS
Values are same as Appendix-C Table - 6.C.4
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 55 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Stiffness in Strength Analysis • Use reduced moment of inertia of beam, column and
wall • Elastic Second order analysis • The reduction represent ultimate state and used for
design
• For lateral deflection under service load multiply these stiffness values by 1.4
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 56 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Wind drift and sway
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 57 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
SWAY CHECK FOR WIND • For occupant comfort • Use reduced moment of inertia of beam, column and wall
• For lateral deflection under service load multiply these stiffness values by 1.4
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 58 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Storey drift for earthquake
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 59 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 60 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 61 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 62 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 63 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 64 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 65 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
BNBC 2017 SEISMIC PROVISIONS Vertical Earthquake Loading, Ev (sec. 2.5.13.2 ) The maximum vertical ground acceleration shall be taken as 50 percent of the expected horizontal peak ground acceleration (PGA). The vertical seismic load effect Ev may be determined as: 𝐸v = 0.5(𝑎ℎ)𝐷 Eqn. (6.2.56) Where, 𝑎ℎ = expected horizontal peak ground acceleration (in g) for design = (2/3)𝑍𝑆 if Z corresponds to MCE (2500 yr return period) = ZS if Z corresponds to DBE (500 yr return period) 𝐷 = effect of dead load, S = site dependent soil factor (see Table 6.2.16).
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 66 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
BNBC 2017 PROVISIONS
Load Effect Combinations for LRFD/USD (Sec. 2.7.3): 1. 1.4(D+F) 2. 1.2(D+F+T) + 1.6(L+H) + 0.5(Lr or R) 3. 1.2D + 1.6(Lr or R) + (L or 0.8W) 4. 1.2D + 1.6W + L + 0.5(Lr or R) 5. 1.2D + E + L 6. 0.9D + 1.6W + 1.6H 7. 0.9D + E + 1.6H
D = Dead load E = Seismic Load F = Fluid pr. H = Soil pr. L = Live load Lr = Roof live load R = Rain load T = Thermal load W = Wind load
Definition of Seismic Load, E
Total load effects of earthquake that include both horizontal and vertical, or related internal moments and forces.
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 67 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
BNBC 2017 PROVISIONS
1. 1.4D 2. 1.2D + 1.6L 3. 1.2D + (L or 0.8W) 4. 1.2D + 1.6W + L 5. 1.2D + E + L 6. 0.9D + 1.6W 7. 0.9D + E
D = Dead load E = Seismic Load F = Fluid pr. H = Soil pr. L = Live load
Lr = Roof live load R = Rain load T = Thermal load W = Wind load
1. 1.4D 2. 1.2D + 1.6L 3. 1.2D + L 4. 1.2D + 0.8W 5. 1.2D + L + 1.6W 6. 1.2D + L + E 7. 0.9D + 1.6W 8. 0.9D + E
For Typical Building Analysis
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 68 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
BNBC 2017 PROVISIONS
1. 1.4D 2. 1.2D + 1.6L 3. 1.2D + L
4. 1.2D + 0.8Wx
5. 1.2D - 0.8Wx
6. 1.2D + 0.8Wy
7. 1.2D - 0.8Wy
8. 1.2D + L + 1.6Wx
9. 1.2D + L - 1.6Wx
10. 1.2D + L + 1.6Wy
11. 1.2D + L - 1.6Wy
12. 1.2D + L + Ex + D 13. 1.2D + L - Ex + D 14. 1.2D + L + Ey + D 15. 1.2D + L – Ey + D
16. 0.9D + 1.6Wx 17. 0.9D - 1.6Wx 18. 0.9D + 1.6Wy 19. 0.9D - 1.6Wy
4
5
7
6
20. 0.9D + Ex - D 21. 0.9D - Ex - D 22. 0.9D + Ey - D 23. 0.9D - Ey - D
8
Expanded Combinations for 3D Analysis of Typical Buildings (SDC B) 𝐸v = 0.5(𝑎ℎ)𝐷 Eqn. (6.2.56), Let Ev = D where = 0.5(𝑎ℎ)
1. 1.4D 2. 1.2D + 1.6L 3. 1.2D + L 4. 1.2D + 0.8W 5. 1.2D + L + 1.6W 6. 1.2D + L + E 7. 0.9D + 1.6W 8. 0.9D + E
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 69 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
BNBC 2017 PROVISIONS
1. 1.4D 2. 1.2D + 1.6L 3. 1.2D + L
4. 1.2D + 0.8Wx
5. 1.2D - 0.8Wx
6. 1.2D + 0.8Wy
7. 1.2D - 0.8Wy
8. 1.2D + L + 1.6Wx
9. 1.2D + L - 1.6Wx
10. 1.2D + L + 1.6Wy
11. 1.2D + L - 1.6Wy
12. 1.2D + L + Ex + 0.3Ey
13. 1.2D + L + Ex - 0.3Ey
14. 1.2D + L - Ex + 0.3Ey
15. 1.2D + L - Ex - 0.3Ey
16. 1.2D + L + Ey + 0.3Ex
17. 1.2D + L + Ey - 0.3Ex
18. 1.2D + L - Ey + 0.3Ex
19. 1.2D + L - Ey - 0.3Ex
20. 0.9D + 1.6Wx 21. 0.9D - 1.6Wx 22. 0.9D + 1.6Wy 23. 0.9D - 1.6Wy
24. 0.9D + Ex + 0.3Ey
25. 0.9D + Ex - 0.3Ey
26. 0.9D - Ex + 0.3Ey
27. 0.9D - Ex - 0.3Ey
28. 0.9D + Ey + 0.3Ex
29. 0.9D + Ey - 0.3Ex
30. 0.9D - Ey + 0.3Ex
31. 0.9D - Ey - 0.3Ex
4
5 7
6 8
Expanded Combinations for 3D Analysis of Typical Buildings
(SDC C and D) Vertical seismic effect not yet shown
1. 1.4D 2. 1.2D + 1.6L 3. 1.2D + L 4. 1.2D + 0.8W 5. 1.2D + L + 1.6W 6. 1.2D + L + E 7. 0.9D + 1.6W 8. 0.9D + E
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 70 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
BNBC 2017 PROVISIONS
12. 1.2D + L + Ex + 0.3Ey + D 13. 1.2D + L + Ex - 0.3Ey + D 14. 1.2D + L - Ex + 0.3Ey + D 15. 1.2D + L - Ex - 0.3Ey + D 16. 1.2D + L + Ey + 0.3Ex + D 17. 1.2D + L + Ey - 0.3Ex + D 18. 1.2D + L - Ey + 0.3Ex + D 19. 1.2D + L - Ey - 0.3Ex + D
24. 0.9D + Ex + 0.3Ey - D 25. 0.9D + Ex - 0.3Ey - D 26. 0.9D - Ex + 0.3Ey - D 27. 0.9D - Ex - 0.3Ey - D 28. 0.9D + Ey + 0.3Ex - D 29. 0.9D + Ey - 0.3Ex - D 30. 0.9D - Ey + 0.3Ex - D 31. 0.9D - Ey - 0.3Ex - D
6 8
Expanded Combinations for 3D Analysis of Typical Buildings Vertical seismic effect considered (SDC C and D) 𝐸v = 0.5(𝑎ℎ)𝐷 Eqn. (6.2.56) Let Ev = D where = 0.5(𝑎ℎ) Combination group 8 and 9 can be re-written...
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 71 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Seismic detailing is given in section 8.3 of part 6
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 72 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
Buildings are to be designed in accordance with Seismic Design Category (SDC).
Seismic Design Category vs RC design requirement. SDC Severity Design requirement B Low Ordinary reinforcement design provisions considering code specified
seismic and other loads. Use of reinforcement up to Grade 80 is possible for main reinforcement.
C Medium Reinforcement design provisions considering code specified seismic and other loads.
Use of reinforcement up to Grade 80 is possible for main reinforcement. Specific detailing of reinforcement at joints are required (no special
calculation needed). D High Special seismic design provisions considering code specified seismic and
other loads for reinforcement design. Maximum Grade 60 steel is allowed for main reinforcement. Rebar must
have fu/fy>1.25 as well as meet specified ductility requirement. Reinforcement design and detailing at joints are required based on special
design calculations specific for joints. This is essential.
BNBC 2017 SEISMIC PROVISIONS
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 73 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET 73
Thank you
Ref: 1. Manual for Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Building, PWD 2. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Frames-NEHRP 3. 2009 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions- Training and Instruction Manual 4. EQTIPS-www.nicee.org 5. Seismic Detailing of Concrete Buildings- David Fanella 6. Bangladesh National Building Code 2015, HBRI
Equivalent Static Analysis: BNBC 2017 74 74
Dr. Tahsin R. Hossain Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET