BMO_Form
11
株株 株株株株株株株株株株株株株株株 （） Your Business Evaluator Years later Market 3/31/2018 3 Items of evaluation Score Market size, feasibility of profit 10 7 Market Size in 2018/3/31 (5) 2 1,800,000,000.00 Average ROI (5) 5 1,045,500,000.00 ROI(%) 58% Market Growth Rate 10 5 20% Competition 10 9 Strength of Competitors (4) 3 Competitor name and product Situation of competitors Restu Mande Bandung Uda Gembul Bandung Chef William Wongso Jakarta Life span of merchandise (3) 3 As long as hungry 10% (3) 3 Acquisition Risk dispersion 10 6 Nasional Internasional Jabodetabek Inggris Feasibility of industry restructuring 10 6 Special social condition 10 5 Halal Label Price Domestic product Fluctuatif Inggridients Price 3/31/2018 3 60 38 Business Name Attractiveness evaluated in Year （YYYY/MM/DD) Max Point Evaluation Premise（grouond for calculation, reference） Market size（$） Growth rate(%) Life Span in Years Industry-wide IP(Patents, Brand etc.) situation dinas kesehatan (PIRT), HAKI, Medsos, Marketing Web, Carefour, Secondary Market Already addopt the vaccum packaging technology, and for the future R&D in hi-tech sterilization. Positive effects Easy Government Permits for SME Negative effects Level of attractiveness in Years later
description
BMO, form
Transcript of BMO_Form
1 Form SheetBusinessNameYour BusinessEvaluatorFill Out Date yyyy/mm/dd2015/2/16Attractivenessevaluated inYearYYYY/MM/DD)Years laterMarket SegmentCountryRegion3/31/183PhilippinesItems of evaluationMax PointScoreEvaluation Premisegrouond for calculation, referenceItems of evaluationMax PointScoreEvaluation Premisegrouond for calculation, referenceMarket size, feasibility of profit107Financial strength105Investment CapitalFuture Investment CapitalCommentsMarket Sizein2018/3/31(5)21,800,000,000.00Market size$OwnGovernmentAverage ROI(5)51,045,500,000.00ROI(%)58%Existing marketing ability105Market Growth Rate105Growth rate(%)20%Existing production ability106Competition109Existing technological ability108Strength of Competitors(4)3Competitor name and productSituation of competitorsStrength of intellectual properties(4)3Restu MandeBandungStrength of R&D(3)3Uda GembulBandungStrength of customization(3)2Chef William WongsoJakartaProcurement ability of raw materials108Life span of merchandise(3)3As long as hungryLife Span in Years10%Support from management108Industry-wide IP(Patents, Brand etc.) situation(3)3dinas kesehatan (PIRT), HAKI, Medsos, Marketing Web, Carefour,AcquisitionSupport from top management or external support(5)4Risk dispersion106Secondary MarketNasionalInternasionalStrong business development team(5)4JabodetabekInggrisLevel of corporate suitability inFeasibility of industry restructuring106Already addopt the vaccum packaging technology, and for the future R&D in hi-tech sterilization.Level of corporate suitability in2015/2/166040Special social condition105Positive effectsEasy Government Permits for SMEHalal LabelLevel of business feasibility12078Negative effectsPriceDomestic productFluctuatif Inggridients PriceLevel of attractiveness in3/31/18Years later36038
&L
2 Guideline Procedure2BusinessNameNot technology nor R&D name, but business name such as retail businessEvaluatorFill Out Date yyyy/mm/dd2012/1/27Attractivenessevaluated inYearYYYY/MM/DD)Years laterMarket SegmentCountryRegion5 years later or the year when the business starts to rollSegment market as small as possibleSpecify major market areaItems of evaluationMax PointScoreEvaluation Premisegrouond for calculation, referenceKey Failure Factors (The most important Assumptions)1Market size, feasibility of profit10Specify data which you based on for your score2Market Sizein5 years later or the year when the business starts to roll(5)math formula and the source of data (ex; unit price x quantity, Sales goal /Share )Market size$3Average ROI(5)Cumulative profit/cumulative investment during period between launch date and evaluation date for Attractiveness)ROI(%)Main AssumptionsDescription of AssumptionsVerification MethodPeriodPerson in chargeMarket Growth Rate10Average rate of annual growth between the period of launching date and evaluation date for attractivenessGrowth rate(%)4Competition105Resistance ability of competitors or potential competitors(4)Competitor name and productSituation of competitors6Name of competitors and productsStrengths of response and commitment level7Life span of merchandise(3)Product or service life spanLife Span in Years years8Strength of IP(Patents, Brand etc.)(3)Entry barrier by intellectual properties such as patents, brand, etc.Acquisitionyear of acquisition9Risk dispersion10Secondary MarketHow many opportunities similar to this size using same technology or know how or different geographical areas10Feasibility of industry restructuring10Impact level of this business on the current industry from technology and market point of views11Special social condition10Positive effectspositive business environmental factors12Negative effectsNegative business environmental factors13Level of attractiveness inYears later06014Capital strength10Investment CapitalFuture Investment CapitalCommentsImprovement for SuitabilityPast Invested capitalExisting marketing ability10Are the current marketing resources sufficient to make this business successful?Existing production ability10Are the current production or operational resources sufficient to make this business successful?Existing technological ability10Strength of intellectual properties(4)Are the intellectual properties strong enough to keep competitors to threat your position?Strength of R&D(3)Are the current R&D resources sufficient to make this business successfulStrength of customization(3)Are the current development resources sufficient to support customers request sufficient?Procurement ability of raw materials10Are the current arrangements sufficient to obtain stable and inexpensive raw materials, parts, etc?Support from management10Support from top management or external support(5)Does this business have strong endorsement from top management or external support?Attract-ivenessSuit-abilityStrong business development team(5)Is this business team has strong leader and team members?ScoresLevel of corporate suitability in60JudgmentNo entry0Level of business feasibility120testtest
&L
2 Guideline Procedure
No EntryEntry with conditionsEntrySuitabilityAttractiveness
3 List of AssumptionsList of Assumptions for BMO EvaluationBusiness0Evaluator12/31/99Fill-out Dateyyyy/mm/dd1899/12/31Key Failure Factors (The most important Assumptions)123Main AssumptionsDescription of AssumptionsVerification MethodPeriodPerson in charge4Manajemen of Assumption51How customer respons, prepare the list62Verify the assumption3Manage the assumption7Type Assumption8Internal : Vismis, Bisnis Policy, production qty, sales pricing9External : social trend, market price, competitor price, rate of market growth, regulation1011121314Improvement for Suitability
&L
3 List of Assumptions11
No EntryEntry with conditionsEntry'List of Assumptions'!#REF!'List of Assumptions'!#REF!SuitabilityAttractiveness
4 BMO Chart3835603535
0Attractiveness lineSuccess lineCorporate SuitabilityAttractivenessBMO Chart
5 Success Curve0.200.19510.2250.205300.207400.21450.215500.22550.23600.25620.27640.3660.325680.36700.470.50.44710.4871.50.52720.5472.50.58730.6273.50.66740.6974.50.72750.7475.50.76760.7776.50.79770.79577.50.81780.81578.50.82790.8379.50.84800.85820.855840.86860.87880.8790100105
Success Curve0Feasibility PointsSuccess ProbabilitySuccess Curve
Background Data for BMO Chart0Attractiveness lineSuccess lineCorporateSuitability00602045Attractiveness3835356035
Background Data Success curve 0Success curveFeasibility0025304045505560626466687070.57171.57272.57373.57474.57575.57676.57777.57878.57979.5808284868890100105Success ratio20%20%20%21%21%21%22%22%23%25%27%30%33%36%40%44%48%52%54%58%62%66%69%72%74%76%77%79%80%81%82%82%83%84%85%86%86%87%87%0%100%
