7/23/2019 Blueprints for Taming the Climate Crisis - The New York Times

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/blueprints-for-taming-the-climate-crisis-the-new-york-times 1/6

http://nyti.ms/1xOKiYD

ECONOMY

Blueprints for Taming the Climate CrisisJULY 8, 2014

Eduardo Porter

ECONOMIC SCENE

Here’s what your future will look like if we are to have a shot at preventing

devastating climate change.

Within about 15 years every new car sold in the United States will be

electric. In fact, by midcentury more than half of the American economy

will run on electricity. Up to 60 percent of power might come from nuclearsources. And coal’s footprint will shrink drastically, perhaps even disappear

from the power supply.

This course, created by a team of energy experts, was unveiled on

Tuesday in a report for the United Nations that explores the technological

paths available for the world’s 15 main economies to both maintain

reasonable rates of growth and cut their carbon emissions enough by 2050

to prevent climatic havoc.

It offers a sobering conclusion. We might be able to pull it off. But it

will take an overhaul of the way we use energy, and a huge investment in

the development and deployment of new energy technologies. Significantly,

it calls for an entirely different approach to international diplomacy on the

issue of how to combat climate change.

“This will require a heroic cooperative effort,” said Jeffrey D. Sachs, the

7/23/2019 Blueprints for Taming the Climate Crisis - The New York Times

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/blueprints-for-taming-the-climate-crisis-the-new-york-times 2/6

Columbia University economist who directs the Sustainable Development

Solutions Network at the United Nations, which convened the

multinational teams.

The teams, one in each of the 15 countries, looked at what would benecessary to keep the atmosphere from warming more than 2 degrees

Celsius, 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above the preindustrial average of the late

19th century, a target that most of the world committed to at the climate

summit meeting in Copenhagen five years ago. To do so, CO2 emissions

from industry and energy use would have to fall to at most 1.6 tons a year

for every person on the planet by midcentury.

That is less than a tenth of annual American emissions per person

today and less than a third of the world average. And we haven’t quite

figured out how to get from here to there.

The American team built several paths that would hit the target, using

different mixes of nuclear power, renewable energy and fossil fuels with

carbon capture and storage technology. So did the Russian team, aided by

the expected shrinking of the Russian population.

But the Chinese team was stymied by the country’s vast heavy industry

— its steel makers and cement plants, which use enormous amounts of

energy. The best it could do was chart a path that took CO2 emissions to

some 3.4 tons per person by midcentury. “We have shipped a lot of industry

to China,” Mr. Sachs said. “Industry is hard to decarbonize.”

Over all, the teams built plausible technological paths to cut annual

emissions across the 15 countries only to about 2.3 tons per person.

The analysis, however, offers solid ground for hope. The teams expect

to improve on these paths in coming months. Faster deployment of some

technologies than assumed could provide for deeper decarbonization in

several countries. What’s more, likely changes in economic structure in

coming decades — such as China’s expected shift away from heavy industry — could further shrink the carbon footprint.

7/23/2019 Blueprints for Taming the Climate Crisis - The New York Times

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/blueprints-for-taming-the-climate-crisis-the-new-york-times 3/6

Most important, the assessment offers an opportunity to end decades

of inconsequential horse-trading over climate change and to start

addressing the problem for real.

Five years since political leaders from countries around the worldcommitted to do whatever it took to keep global temperatures from rising

more than two degrees above the preindustrial average, no one had taken

the trouble, until now, to evaluate how that might be achieved.

Lacking any understanding of the feasibility of the exercise,

governments postured and jockeyed over which country should be

responsible for what, offering as little as they could get away with in actual

reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, whether the collective effort met

the two-degree commitment or not.

“If governments don’t have any idea of what two degrees means in

their countries, how can they commit to two degrees?” asked Guido

Schmidt-Traub, executive director of the Sustainable Development

Network.

The report commissioned by the United Nations could end the

jockeying: to stick to the two-degree limit every country, rich and poor,

must reduce annual CO2 emissions to 1.6 tons per person, whether it is

responsible for a lot or a little of the climate change so far.

This is dictated not by fairness, but by our technological frontier. There

is wiggle room for negotiation. China’s emissions from manufacturing

would look smaller if they were allocated to consuming rather than

producing countries. Still, we know of no feasible technology that would

allow, say, the United States to have negative emissions in 2050 so India or

China could emit more.

The new assessment also underscores the pointlessness of small,

incremental emissions cuts. Under the path, the United States decarbonizes

its energy supply at an average pace of almost 4 percent a year over the nextfour decades. That is more than 10 times faster than the Energy

7/23/2019 Blueprints for Taming the Climate Crisis - The New York Times

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/blueprints-for-taming-the-climate-crisis-the-new-york-times 4/6

Information Administration’s forecast last year. China takes CO2 out of its

energy about six times as fast as the E.I.A.’s forecast.

This is not achievable by going after low-hanging fruit, such as

replacing coal with natural gas in power plants. Doing so could even be

counterproductive, locking the country’s energy infrastructure into a high-

carbon path.

Most important, perhaps, the new assessment suggests that deep

decarbonization can be done without breaking any economy. Chinese

incomes, for instance, are assumed to grow about 4.6 percent a year until

midcentury.

The decarbonization paths rely on aggressive assumptions about our

ability to deploy new technologies on a commercial scale economically. For

instance, carbon capture and storage is supposed to be available starting in

about 10 years. Second-generation biofuels are assumed to come into play

by 2020. Hydrogen fuel cells and power storage technology are deployed

starting around 2030.

But these technologies all exist today and seem reasonably scalable.

The teams did not rely on more speculative technologies, like cold fusion, to

make their numbers.

The new approach — which the United Nations hopes will inform the

debate up to the next climate summit in Paris in fall 2015 — could offer a

path out of the stalemate that international climate negotiations have

become.

No country will commit legally to slash its CO2 emissions by 80

percent over the next 40 years. But if there is a map, many might offer their

best effort to follow it. Absent a legal commitment, a long-term path could

encourage the large investments ultimately required to address the

problem.

“Governments won’t precommit to huge technological revolutions on a

7/23/2019 Blueprints for Taming the Climate Crisis - The New York Times

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/blueprints-for-taming-the-climate-crisis-the-new-york-times 5/6

legal basis,” Professor Sachs said. “Countries might be willing to aspire

more on a conditional basis.”

What’s more, countries are more likely to participate if they

understand what everybody else is trying. “The Chinese want to see an American pathway to two degrees,” Mr. Schmidt-Traub said.

Big challenges remain. Any 40-year forecast must be taken with some

skepticism. Technologies that seem feasible and economic today might turn

out not to be. And it bears repeating that though the teams contend they

can get to 1.6 tons per person, they have not yet.

Russia, for instance, hit the target. But Oleg Lugovoy of the

Environmental Defense Fund, who worked on the Russian plan, observed

that “if we don’t have carbon capture and storage we would have to

reconsider.”

And while sketching a technological path toward a low carbon

economy will certainly help ground in reality the abstract negotiations over

the future of climate, it does not do away with the main hitch that has

stumped progress for decades: How much will this all cost and who will pay

for it?

The team purposefully did not assess the costs of their paths to prevent

distributional arguments from flaring up immediately. That gives policy

makers space to consider the implications without having to stake out a

negotiating stance.

An assessment of costs and how they could be distributed will be added

in a next iteration to be published next spring. Debates over cost allocation

and technology transfer could still hamstring prospects of substantive

international collaboration.

But despite these risks, the report offers a promising new path to

overcome the decades-old logjam of climate change negotiations. For the

first time, when we say we can stop the climate from heating we will more

or less know what we are talking about.

7/23/2019 Blueprints for Taming the Climate Crisis - The New York Times

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/blueprints-for-taming-the-climate-crisis-the-new-york-times 6/6

Email: eporter@nytimes.com;

Twitter: @portereduardo

A version of this article appears in print on July 9, 2014, on page B1 of the New York edition

with the headline: Blueprints for Taming the Climate Crisis.

© 2015 The New York Times Company