Blended learning pace march 2013 slideshare version
22
Anthony G. Picciano CUNY Graduate Center Blended Learning Meets MOOCs: Education’s Digital Future presentation at Pace University March 2013
description
This presentation was delivered as the keynote at a conference held at Pace University, New York in March 2013. It examines blended learning and MOOCs as harbingers of education's digital future.
Transcript of Blended learning pace march 2013 slideshare version
Anthony G. PiccianoCUNY Graduate Center
Blended Learning Meets MOOCs: Education’s Digital Future
presentation at Pace University March 2013
2
Presentation Outline
.Introduction
.Teaching and Learning in 2012 – Scenarios
.Blended Learning
.Blending with Pedagogical Purpose
.Enter the MOOCs
.Education’s Digital Future
.Questions
3
Teaching and Learning in 2013 –
Different Scenarios!
4
Teaching and Learning in 2013 –
Different Scenarios!
Blended Learning Conceptualization
ConventionalFace to Face Classroom
Fully
Online
Blended
Source: Picciano, A.G, & Dzuiban, C. (2007). Blended learning: Research perspectives. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/books/index.asp
Synthesis/ Evaluation
(Assignments/Assessment) Papers, Tests, Student Presentations (PPT, Youtube), E-Portfolios
Blending with Pedagogical Purpose: A Multimodal Model
Reflection
(Blog,Journal)
Collaboration/Student Generated Content
(Wiki, Mobile Tech)
Social/Emotional (F2F)
Dialectic/Questioning
(Discussion Board)
Content
(LMS/CMS/Media/
Games/MUVE)
Blending with
Purpose
Source: Picciano (2009).
Blending with Purpose – The Multimodal Model
Synthesis/ Evaluation (Assignments/Assessment) Papers, Tests, Student Presentations (PPT, Youtube), E-Portfolios
Reflection
(Blog,Journal)
Collaboration/Student Generated Content
(Wiki, Mobile Tech)
Social/Emotional (F2F)
Dialectic/Questioning
(Discussion Board)
Blended
Ecosystem
Content (LMS/CMS/Media/ Games/MUVE)
8
Blended Learning as Ecosystem
As blended learning matures and develops, it is evolving into a seamless, organic environment or ecosystem
It is the artful design of a teaching and learning experience that leverages instruction, technology, administrative and support services, into a natural experience for learner and teacher.
9
Enter the MOOCs – Massive Open Online Courses
.The term MOOC is used for the first time in 2008 at the U. of Manitoba.
.Sebastian Thrun offers a MOOC in 2011 at Stanford University and 160,000 students enroll.
.MOOC consortia/companies (Udacity, edX, Coursera) are formed.
.Millions of students are now enrolling every year in MOOCs.
10
MOOCs - Pros and Cons!
Pros
Worldwide student access to courses and materials Scalability will drive down higher education costs
Convenience for adults/ career development Interesting uses of data and learning analytics
Cons
Taking a course is not equivalent to an education
Some MOOCs are poorly designed and lack substantive interaction
High attrition rates (as much as 90%) Financial sustainability (most MOOCs are free).
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." – Thomas Watson, Chairman of IBM, 1943
11
The Future of Technology
- Easy to Get it Wrong!
"There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." – Ken Olson, president, Chairman Digital Equipment Corp., 1977
"640K ought to be enough memory for anybody." – Bill Gates, Chairman of Microsoft, 1981
12
The Future – Higher Education
Source: U.S. Department of Education - NCES (January 2013). Projections of Education Statistics to 2012.
13
Non-Traditional Students are Now Traditional!
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, “Fall Enrollment Survey” (IPEDS-EF:94–99), and Spring 2001 through Spring 2009; Enrollment in Degree-Granting Institutions Model, 1980–2008; and U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, "Social and Economic Characteristics of Students," various years. (This table was prepared February 2010.)
14
The Future - One Size Does Not Fit All!
.Different strokes for different folks.
.Different types of schools will approach Blended Learning and MOOCs differently.
.Different programs/disciplines/courses will approach Blended Learning and MOOCs differently.
.Different students will approach Blended Learning and MOOCs differently.
15
The Future – Allen & Seaman Survey of Chief Academic Officers (N=2,820)
Source: Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2013).
This year’s survey finds only 2.6 percent report they currently offer MOOCs and slightly less than ten percent (9.4%) have plans to offer them.
16
The Future
Source: Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2013).
When examined by Carnegie classification, it is the research universities (Doctoral/Research institutions) that are in the lead. They are almost twice as likely to beoffering MOOCs or planning to offer MOOCs (9.8% vs. the next highest of 4.5%for Specialized institutions in offerings and 21.4% vs. the next highest of 11.8% forMaster’s level institutions for planning).
17
The Future
Source: Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2013).
Overall, academic leaders are split in their opinions about MOOCs as a sustainablemethod for offering courses with 27.8 percent agreeing, 27.0 percent disagreeing,and most Chief Academic Officers (45.2%) neutral.
18
The Future – Large Lecture Courses
Will Pave the Way!
.Put lecture part of the course in online/MOOC environment
.Put discussion/recitation part of the course in blended environment.
19
The Future – MOOCs -> OCs
.San Jose State University enters into Agreement with Udacity to develop remedial and introductory courses (2013-2016).
.Courses will be limited to 300 students.
.Tuition will be $150. per course.
.Provision for faculty involvement in a blended format.
.Efforts will be made to overcome the biggest failure of MOOCs — their 90 percent dropout rate.
20
Summary/Questions?
22
ReferencesAllen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Wellesley, MA: Babson College Survey Research Group. Knowles, M., Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R. (1998). The adult learner. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Lin, L., Cranton, P., & Bridglall, B. (2005). Psychological Type and Asynchronous Written Dialogue in Adult Learning.Teachers College Record Volume 107 Number 8, 2005, p. 1788-1813http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 12096, Date Accessed: 1/25/2008 3:15:54 PM
Picciano, A.G. & Dzuiban, C. (2007). Blended learning: Research perspectives. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
Picciano, A.G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 5(1). Kent, Oh: Kent State University.
U.S. Department of Education - NCES (January 2013). Projections of Education Statistics to 2012.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, “Fall Enrollment Survey” (IPEDS-EF:94–99), and Spring 2001 through Spring 2009; Enrollment in Degree-Granting Institutions Model, 1980–2008; and U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, "Social and Economic Characteristics of Students," various years. (This table was prepared February 2010.)
