Black Holes Accretion vs Galaxy Properties

8
Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, GERMANY Angela Bongiorno s: A. Merloni, G. Zamorani, M. Brusa, D. Vergani et al. Honolulu, June 9 th 2010

description

Black Holes Accretion vs Galaxy Properties. Angela Bongiorno. Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, GERMANY. Cols: A. Merloni, G. Zamorani, M. Brusa, D. Vergani et al. Honolulu, June 9 th 2010. EVOLUTIONARY SCENARIO. Starburst & buried Quasar. Galaxy mergers. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Black Holes Accretion vs Galaxy Properties

Page 1: Black Holes Accretion  vs Galaxy Properties

Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik,

Garching, GERMANY

Angela BongiornoAngela Bongiorno

Cols: A. Merloni, G. Zamorani, M. Brusa, D. Vergani et al.

Honolulu, June 9th 2010

Page 2: Black Holes Accretion  vs Galaxy Properties

Hie

rarc

hica

l gr

owth

Grow

th of SM

BH

Gas inflow

AGN feedback Active

Quasar

Starburst &buried Quasar

Normal galaxies

Galaxy mergers

(adapted from Hopkins et al., 2008)

EVOLUTIONARY SCENARIO

Page 3: Black Holes Accretion  vs Galaxy Properties

Fraction of Obscured AGN vs L and z

0.15< z <0.3 from ∼65% to ∼50% from L[O III]=106.2 -108.2 L to 108.2-109.2L

• at L[OIII] > Lc, decreasing fraction of type–2 AGN with luminosity

• What happen at L[OIII] < Lc?

0.3< z <0.45 and 0.5< z <0.92 from ∼80% to ∼25% from L[O III =106.2-108.5L ⊙ to L[O III]=109.0-109.6L ⊙

(Bongiorno, Mignoli, Zamorani et al., 2010 A&A 510, 56B)

SDSS (Reyes08)zCOSMOS

0.15<z<0.3 0.3<z<0.45 0.5<z<0.9

Page 4: Black Holes Accretion  vs Galaxy Properties

SDSS type-2 AGN sample @z<0.3 (Kauffmann & Heckman 2008)

BH accretion as a function of galaxy properties…

Feast: Galaxies rich in cold gas ; BH growth is regulated by small-scale feedback.

Famine: Galaxies poor in cold gas. BH accretes ~0.3% - 1% of the mass lost by evolved bulge stars.

~2% Edd

Eddington Log(L[OIII]/MBH) =1.7

Page 5: Black Holes Accretion  vs Galaxy Properties

BH accretion and star formation…at higher redshift

using the 20k zCOSMOS type-2 AGN sample 392 sources @ z~1

(close to the peak of the cosmic AGN and star formation density)➤ AGN hosts masses through SED fitting

• AGN templates: - Elvis et al. (1994) - E(b-v)=0 - 0.3 in 0.01 steps• Galaxy templates: - 14 phenomenological from Polletta (2007) - Libr. of synthetic sp. (Bruzual & Charlot) a) 10 declining SFH SFR e-t/ =[0.1-30] Gyr tage=[50Myr-5 Gyr] tage<tuniv(z) 0 < E(B-V) <0.5 b) 1 constant SF

Separate the Spectral Energy Distribution of AGN into nuclear+host components and derive the host properties

(Merloni, Bongiorno et al. 2010 ApJ 708, 137M)

Red/Purple: Galaxy templateBlue: AGN template

Used Bands6 SUBARU bands

K band (CFHT)4 Spitzer/IRAC

24m Spitzer/MIPS

Page 6: Black Holes Accretion  vs Galaxy Properties

SED fitting M* (scaling relation) BH masses

(150)

~1.5%Edd~0.2%Edd

( Bongiorno, Merloni et al. in prep)

BH accretion and star formation…at higher redshift

➤ Computation of the BH Masses

Page 7: Black Holes Accretion  vs Galaxy Properties

( Bongiorno, Merloni et al. in prep)

Using the sSFR to distinguish “old” and “young” galaxies

~0.6%Edd~0.02%Edd

(391)

Page 8: Black Holes Accretion  vs Galaxy Properties

( Bongiorno, Merloni et al. in prep)

Using the sSFR to distinguish “old” and “young” galaxies

Dotted lines: [OIII] completeness limit

Gradual trend towards lower Eddington ratios with older stellar population content.

However … selection effect still to be fully accounted for…