Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
-
Upload
judicialfraud -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 1/20
Page 1 of 2
Judicial Council of the 11th Circuit
COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY
To begin the complaint process, complete this form and prepare the brief statement of factsdescribed in item 5 (below). The RULES FOR JUDICIAL-CONDUCT AND JUDICIAL-DISABILITY
PROCEEDINGS, adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States, contain information on
what to include in a complaint (Rule 6), where to file a complaint (Rule 7), and other important
matters. The rules are available in federal court clerks’ offices, on individual federal courts’
Web sites, and on www.uscourts.gov.
Your complaint (this form and the statement of facts) should be typewritten and must be legible.
For the number of copies to file, consult the local rules or clerk’s office of the court in which
your complaint is required to be filed. Enclose each copy of the complaint in an envelope
marked “COMPLAINT OF MISCONDUCT” or “COMPLAINT OF DISABILITY” and submit
it to the appropriate clerk of court. Do not put the name of any judge on the envelope.
1. Name of Complainant: DR. JORG BUSSE
Contact Address: P.O.BOX 7561
NAPLES, FL 34101-7561
Daytime telephone: ( 239 ) 595-7074
2. Name(s) of Judge(s): JUDGE BLACK
Court: U.S.COURTOFAPPEALS,11thCIRCUIT
3. Does this complaint concern the behavior of the judge(s) in a particular lawsuit or
lawsuits?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
If “yes,” give the following information about each lawsuit:
Court: ITCONCERNS:CORRUPTION,CASE-FIXING,BRIBERY
Case Number:
Docket number of any appeal to the Circuit: ___________________
Are (were) you a party or lawyer in the lawsuit?
[ ] Party [ ] Lawyer [ ] Neither
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 2/20
Page 2 of 2
If you are (were) a party and have (had) a lawyer, give the lawyer’s name, address, and
telephone number:
4. Have you filed any lawsuits against the judge?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
If “yes,” give the following information about each such lawsuit:
Court: LAWSUIT PENDING
Case Number:
Present status of lawsuit:
Name, address, and telephone number of your lawyer for the lawsuit against the judge:
Court to which any appeal has been taken in the lawsuit against the judge:
Docket number of the appeal:
Present status of the appeal:
5. Brief Statement of Facts. Attach a brief statement of the specific facts on which the
claim of judicial misconduct or disability is based. Include what happened, when and
where it happened, and any information that would help an investigator check the facts.
If the complaint alleges judicial disability, also include any additional facts that form the
basis of that allegation.
6. Declaration and signature:
I declare under penalty of perjury that the statements made in this complaint are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge.
(Signature) /S/JORG BUSSE,M.D.,M.B.A.,M.M. (Date) 04/22/2009
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 3/20
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 4/20
CRIMINAL JUDICIAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE BLACK
1
5. BRIEF STATEMENT OF PUBLICLY RECORDED/SPECIFIC FACTS
1. Attached is self-authenticating unauthorized and null-and-void Lee County
[FL] Official Record [O.R.]569/875. Defendant Judge Black [“Black”]
conspired to conceal the invalidity of prima facie unexecuted sham land
[eminent domain] “claim” O.R.569/875. Under false pretenses of a “legislativeact ”, Black conspired to defraud and deliberately deprive the Appellants of
their Constitutionally-protected riparian Gulf-front lands [PID 12-44-20-01-
00015.015A]. In the sham 04/21/2009 11th
Circuit Opinion, Black conceded that
“Appellants’ [riparian] Lot 15A is on the west side of the Cayo Costa
subdivision on the Gulf of Mexico…”
Here, Black conceded that Appellants’ riparian lands abut the “Gulf of
Mexico”, which is the platted natural monument and Lot boundary.
BLACK CONCEALED PLATTED DESIGNATED 60’ WIDE STREET
2. Defendant Black [“Black”] concealed that a designated 60’ wide street appears
“on the west side” of the 1912 Plat of the private undedicated residential
subdivision. See Plat Book 3, p. 25.
BLACK CONCEALED ABSENCE OF ANY “UNDESIGNATED AREAS ”
3. Defendant Black conspired to conceal that no “‘undesignated areas’ appear on
said Plat and that no “ Lee County Resolution 569/875” exists. Black stated:
“Most of the allegations in the complaint concern the 1969 Lee County
Resolution 569/875, which claimed the undesignated areas on the east and
west side of the Cayo Costa subdivision plat and accretions thereto as
public land to be used for public purposes.” Opinion, p. 3.
Defendant Black concealed that admittedly, Lee County never executed andsigned eminent domain fraud and extortion-scheme O.R.569/875. Said fraud-
scheme was devoid of any resolution number .
CONCOCTION OF “UN-NUMBERED AND UNLETTERED AREAS ”
4. Black concealed that no ‘undesignated areas’ and no ‘certain un-numbered and unlettered areas lying West of the Westerly tier of blocks in said subdivision’
appear on said 1912 Plat. Black concealed that in its eminent domain fraud-
scheme, Lee County fraudulently “claimed” accretions to undesignated un-
numbered and unlettered areas, which do not appear on said 1912 Plat. Black
conspired to extend said eminent domain fraud-scheme. Black concealed that
Appellants’ multiple independent claims regarding state eminent domain fraud
issues were ripe.
BLACK CONCEDED THAT APPELLANTS OWN DESIGNATED STREET
5. Defendant Black conceded that Appellants own the platted adjoining designated
60’ wide street:
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 5/20
CRIMINAL JUDICIAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE BLACK
2
“The Appellants are owners of Lot 15A [PID 12-44-20-01-00015.015A] in
the Cayo Costa subdivision in Lee County, Florida.” Opinion, p. 2.
6. Defendant Black knew that the Appellants hold perfect title to and own the
platted adjoining designated 60’ wide street, the upland, and accretions thereto.
Black concealed that said platted designated street 60’ wide is a private
easement, which is Constitutionally-protected property. See also “First Case”;
Legal Opinion [Doc. # 31-4].
7. Defendant Black conspired not to review de novo eminent domain extortion
and fraud-scheme O.R.569/875, which invoked Federal jurisdiction. Black
concealed that Lee County itself removed and eliminated any cloud by eminent domain fraud-scheme O.R.569/875 pursuant to Blue Sheet 980206 and
O.R.2967/1084-1090. Black conspired to fix and dismiss Appellants’ ripe
Federal claims under the 14th
, 4th
, 5th
, 1st, and 7
thAmendments to protect his
fellow Defendant Judges. Black obstructed justice and just adjudication by
concealing the invalidity of said eminent domain fraud-scheme which wasprima facie devoid of legal description/boundaries, seal , execution, vote count ,
names of any single legislator , resolution number, public purpose.
8. Black conspired not to construe the fictitious undesignated un-
numbered/unlettered areas in the light most favorable to Appellants, but
extended the fraud-scheme. Corrupt and dishonest Official Black does more
harm to the public and Appellants than common criminals, because he
obstructs investigation. Baucom v. Martin, 677 F.2d 1346(11th
Cir.1982). Black
has no immunity for his crimes of, e.g., false pretenses, misprision of felonies,
deliberate deprivations, fraud.
EXHIBITS:
Eminent domain extortion-scheme O.R.569/875, which invoked jurisdiction
Self-authenticating 1912 Plat devoid of
undesignated areas;
undesignated un-numbered and unlettered areas on the west side;
Public record evidence of platted designated 60’ wide street
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 6/20
CRIMINAL JUDICIAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE BLACK
3
DEFENDANT BLACK CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL
Defendant Black conspired to conceal that:
(1) O.R.569/875 is an eminent domain fraud and extortion-scheme
(2) Lee County never had any authority to ‘claim’/condemn uncertain lands
(3) Eminent domain fraud-scheme O.R.569/875 invoked Federal jurisdiction
(4) Any [inverse] condemnation was impossible absent a legal description
(5) Any condemnation [inverse or direct ] was impossible for private use
(6) This Circuit concocted “200 Acres” to be the ‘claimed’ area absent boundaries
(7) Appellants pursued remedy of invalidation in State court
(8) Invalidation and damages for the temporary taking were exclusive remedies
(9) A designated 60’ wide street appears on the west side of Cayo Costa
(10) No “undesignated ” areas exist on the Plat
(11) No undesignated un-numbered and unlettered areas appear on said Plat
(12) No legal description exists
(13) No ascertainable boundaries exist(14) “ Reverse condemnation remedy” did not exist for said fraud-scheme
(15) Appellees treated Appellants disparately as compared to A. M. S. Robinson
(16) Any O.R.569/875 cloud was removed [Blue Sheet 980206 / O.R.2967/1084]
(17) Appellants own the accretions to their riparian Lot and adjoining street
(18) No identifiable legislators ever “passed” fraud-scheme O.R.569/875
(19) Absent any legal description, said fraud-scheme violated due process
(20) Eide, Reahard, Tinney, Greenbriar, did not apply to eminent domain fraud
(21) The D.C. Judges were objectively partial, because no legislative act existed
(22) Appellants stated ripe claims: e.g., unconstitutional temporary takings
(23) No public lands existed in private undedicated Cayo Costa
(24) This Circuit engaged in case-fixing and bribery
(25) Lee County never held title to the fictitious undesignated areas “claimed”
DEFENDANT BLACK’S CONCESSIONS
Defendant Black conceded that:
(26) Appellants’ riparian Lot 15A abuts the “Gulf of Mexico”
(27) Appellants are the legal record owners of Lot 15A[12-44-20-01-00015.015A]
(28) As owners of Lot 15A, Appellants own the adjoining designated street
(29) R. 11 sanctions were inappropriate, because eminent domain issues were ripe
CONSPIRACY AND FALSE PRETENSES
Defendant Black conspired to falsely pretend that:
(30) Reverse condemnation is an available remedy [invalidation was available]
(31) Appellants’ claims under the 1st, 4
th, 14
th, 5
th, and 7
thAmend. were not ripe
(32) Regulatory case law applied to said eminent domain fraud-scheme
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 7/20
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 8/20
11TH
CIRCUIT FRAUD, CORRUPTION, CASE-FIXING, BRIBERY
UNDER FALSE PRETENSES THAT NULL AND VOID O.R.569/875
IS A PURPORTED “ LEGISLATIVE ACT ”:
THE 11TH
CIRCUIT
• CONCOCTED A “ LEGISLATIVE ACT ” [NO RECORD EXISTS];
• CONCEALS O.R.569/875’s PRIMA FACIE INVALIDITY;
• PERVERTED SAID SHAM “CLAIM” INTO A “ LEGISLATIVE ACT ”;
• OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE FOR APPELLEES’ BRIBES.
UNEXECUTED O.R.569/875 IS INVALID FOR MANY REASONS:
1. IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND IPSE DIXIT CONFISCATORY
2. NO ASCERTAINABLE LEGAL BOUNDARIES
3. NO LEGAL DESCRIPTION – SURVEY IMPOSSIBLE
4. NO SIGNATURE(S) BY LEE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
5. NO EXECUTION BY LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA
6. NO IDENTIFIABLE “ LEGISLATOR”
7. NO RESOLUTION NUMBER
8. NO RECORD OR ENTRY IN COUNTY RESOLUTION BOOK(S)9. NO NOTARIAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
10. NO SEAL
11. NO IDENTIFIABLE PUBLIC USE/PURPOSE
12. NO NECESSITY
13. PUBLIC USE FACTUALLY AND LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE
14. EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED BY FLORIDA CONSTITUTION
15. VIOLATES FLORIDA’S EMINENT DOMAIN STATUTES
16. VIOLATES 14TH
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
17. VIOLATES 4TH
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
18. VIOLATES 5TH
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
19. DECEPTION OUTSIDE JUDICIAL CAPACITY AND JURISDICTION
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 9/20
Rules for Judicial-Conductand Judicial-Disability Proceedings
Adopted March 11, 2008, by the Judicial Conference of the United States
Effective April 10, 2008
WITH
Eleventh Circuit Judicial Conduct and Disability Rules
(Cited as 11th Cir. JCDR)
Effective April 1, 2009
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 10/20
CC: U.S. Supreme Court [11th
Circuit Corruption and Case-Fixing;
Concealment of fraud-scheme O.R.569/875];
Federal Bureau of Investigation
U.S. Department of Justice
Florida Department of Law Enforcement
U.S. Attorney
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 11/20
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 12/20
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 13/20
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 14/20
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 15/20
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 16/20
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 17/20
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 18/20
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 19/20
8/9/2019 Black Criminal Judicial Complaint res
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-criminal-judicial-complaint-res 20/20