Black Book II (1)

8/9/2019 Black Book II (1)

1/251

1

January 1 2009

Irrefutable evidence the government is Organized Crime personified with the RCMP providing the

conclusive proof by persistently refusing to Investigate Government Organized Crime-corruption andconspiracy demonstrating their modus operandi designed by the conspirators that has permitted theirsuccess.

BLACK BOOK II (1)The RCMP Connection Part 1

Compiled RCMP Correspondence January 3 2006 until November 8 2007

Commencing page 37 is the Correspondence with the RCMP that began January 3 2006 up and toNovember 8 2007 when I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP for refusingto investigate Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy.

On September 10 2008 I received the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 signed byRCMP Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander Greater Toronto Area. (Pages 17, 18)

On September 23 2008 I requested a REVIEW of the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition (Pages 3-32) andreceived confirmation September 24 2008 signed be S.Smitt stating the pertinent evidence has beenrequested from the RCMP (Page 36)

On page 7 I note the importance of acquiring a copy of Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdams report ASAP and onNovember 7 2008 I wrote requesting copies of said report but they have refused to respond as suspectedbeing under the control of the conspirators. (Pages 33-36)

Note: the Chain of Command of the RCMP

Prime MinisterParliament of CanadaDOJ-Minister of Justice and Attorney General of CanadaMinister of Public SafetyRCMP Commissioner

These offices have responded irrefutably proving their involvement in the conspiracy

Amongst the evidence provided to the RCMP is the original BLACK BOOK dated September 1 2007clearly noted in Lawyer File # 14 addressed to Sgt. Michael Thomson that clearly shows the issues havepersistently been of Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy headed by the office of theOntario Attorney General and the major role the RCMP play in it since Sgt. Thomsons response of January18 2006 where he links the DOJ to the conspiracy as they ignore the evidence of the criminally fraudulentoccurrences at the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal June 30 2005, as had others before I came to the RCMPwith the evidence.

Since Sgt. Thomsons response of January 18 2006 I have proliferated cyber space with irrefutable evidenceof the Government conspiracy and refusal to restructure the illegitimate system to a legal one consistent


2/251

2

with the Constitution conducive to the support of every individuals guaranteed Charter rights of equalprotection and benefits

The RCMP, the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, my MP Peter Van Loan, DOJ-Minister of Justice andAttorney General of Canada, Robert Nicholson and former Vic Toews, Minister of Public Safety StockwellDay, and RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and former commissioner ZACK, Senators, the GovernorGeneral and Armed Forces have been e-mailed the irrefutable evidence along with a prodigious numbers of others of the Federal Government whose e-mail addresses appear in the AAAALIST document published on

the Charter Democracy Force web site and others referenced on the URus Charter Democracy Force ROPweb site www.URus.ca

The AAAALIST also includes a prodigious number of prominent Ontario Government personnel, thePremier of Ontario Dalton McGuinty, my MPPP Julia Munro, Ombudsman, Attorney General Chris Bentleyand former Michael Bryant to name a few, the media, Church, charities, Bar Associations across Canada,the Federation of Law Societies and the Lieutenant Governor.

The issues are addressed in other editions of the BLACK BOOK irrefutably proving the entire government,federal and provincial are staffed with personnel that do not give a damn about the Constitution, the peopleand their guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit cooperating with the conspiracy and the

reason for its success as the struggle of humankind persists as it has since long before Confucius 551 BC-479 BC gave us the Golden Rule Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself and

There were no dates in this history scrawled this way and that scrawled across every page were the wordsBENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITYfinally I began to make out what was writtenbetween the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE

As Confucius says there were no dates as the same ideology persists today in the illegitimate systemstructured by government members of the Law Societies to ransack the people and protect their membersfrom their victims who become aware but stand alone against these charlatans of deception, prevarication,manipulation and orchestration of the people and the entire government for the unscrupulous purpose of the

nefarious bent.

The evidence is overwhelming supported by reality itself with no legitimate way out that will finally end thestruggle of all humankind or just mine.

The government conspirators illegitimate system is well documented as they site this law and that devoid of mention of the Constitution and Charter rights simply because there is no semblance to the spirit of theirmodus operandi with The Spirit of the Law that provides the authority and demands, either stated orimplied the Constitution: Establishment be the personification of the Constitution: Document yet tomaterialize.

The Ideal is simply reality sanely dealt with
http://www.urus.ca/http://www.urus.ca/


3/251

3

Continued in BLACK BOOK II (2)

The RCMP Connection Part 2

Compiled RCMP Correspondence November 9 2007 up to September 3 2008

This is copyright material See www.URus.ca for restrictions For Personal Use Only
http://www.urus.ca/http://www.urus.ca/


4/251

4

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: September 25, 2008 3:15 PMTo: 'REVIEWS'Subject: RE: Check: Correction

September 25 2008

Please make note of corrected date on page 4 of the Request Review of Complaint September 25 2008document published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web sitehttp://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

Excerpt from page 4 follows

False statements are underlined

Paragraphs

Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

The investigator also reviewed numerous documents found on my web sites in order to understand thecircumstances surrounding my complaintThat is what he stated in his May 20 2008 interim reportHe has reviewed Staff Sergeant MacAdams report and wishes to share with me the results.He emphasizes that despite the hundreds of pages of documentation involved in my complaint, the RCMPssole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately.

He is suggesting there is a difference as to how the evidence is examined. The evidence provided toSergeant Michael Thomson up to October 18 2007 when I met with Roy Steinebach is irrefutable to theGovernment Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy even though he refused to take the evidence Ibrought to him that date he said he had access to the evidence that I had been sending to Sergeant Michael

Thomsons e-mail address and I could continue to send evidence via the same method, which I did and is allrelevant up to the date I filed the complaint with the commission November 8 2007. I presume he wasinstructed how to handle me before we met on October 7 2007, (Correction: October 18 2007 not October 72007) perhaps a note on the file. As far as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent RobertDavis states Inspector Verheul instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the evidence and istherefore responsible for Sergeant Thomsons actions. Inspector Brian Verheul had plenty of time toconfirm whether or not the evidence was relative to the Government Organized Crime of corruption andconspiracy. It is yet to be determined if Inspector Verheul acted on his own or consulted with hissuperiors.)

Please acknowledge

Frank Gallagher
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-forcehttp://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force


5/251

5

From: REVIEWS [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: September 23, 2008 3:33 PMTo: [email protected]: RE: Check

This is to acknowledge receipt of your Request for a Review. You will be receiving a letter shortlyconfirming your request.

Thank you.

Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMPReviews & Investigations UnitFAX #: 613-952-8045TELEPHONE #: 1-800-267-6637E-MAIL ADDRESS: [email protected]

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: September 23, 2008 3:24 PM

To: REVIEWSSubject: Check

September 23 2008

Commission for Public Complaints Against the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceCanada Post: Bag Service 1722Ottawa, OntarioK1P 0B3Fax-613-952-8045www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca

Re: File No. PC-2007-2316Re: File No. PC-2007-2317

Re: Request Review of my ComplaintRCMP refuse to investigateGovernment corruption and conspiracy

Dear Commission Representative

I have received the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 signed by Superintendent

Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area and he informs if I wish to exercise my right to areview of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by contacting the Commission for PublicComplaints Against the RCMP at Canada Post: Bag Service 1722, Fax-613-952-8045, andwww.cpc.cpp.gc.ca

I do wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint. I have had some difficultiescommunicating with Andree Leduc, Enquiries and Complaints Analyst at the 7337 137 Street, Suite 102,Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4 office so I am submitting this Request for Review of my Complaint byboth Fax-613-952-8045 and your on line form at www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca .

Frank Gallagher34 Riverglen DriveKeswick, On.L4P [email protected]

ManagerCharter Democracy Forcewww.cdf.name
mailto:[email protected]://www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca/http://www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca/http://www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca/mailto:[email protected]://www.cdf.name/http://www.cdf.name/mailto:[email protected]://www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca/http://www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca/http://www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca/mailto:[email protected]


6/251

6

Andree Leduc will get the whole document by e-mail along with the rest on the AAAAALIST

All pertinent evidence regarding this Request for Review of my Complaint is published or referenced on theRCMP Final Letter of Disposition http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition affiliate web site of the Charter Democracy ForceAll evidence published on this site is pertinent including correspondence with Andree Leduc of your Surrey,British Columbia Office.

The RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 implicates Inspector Robert Davis to be inon the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and the details are explained indocument Request Review of Complaint September 23 2008 published on the aforementioned web site of which this is the first page.

The links to the evidence originally published on the sites referenced in my original complaint to your officeNovember 8 2007 were corrupted so I opened a new site CDF Documents and transferred pertinentevidence there informing Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam and everyone else published on the AAAAALISTof the original Charter Democracy Force web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

The CDF Documents web site can be accessed from this site. .

It would be prudent to mention that I have been providing the irrefutable evidence of GovernmentOrganized Crime of corruption and conspiracy to Sergeant Michael Thomson of the Milton RCMP officesince January 18 2006 when he responded to the evidence I originally left with Inspector Peter Goulet of theNewmarket detachment dated November 15 2005.On January 3 2006 Inspector P. Goulet wrote to inform the evidence was originally reviewed by membersof the Federal Enforcement Section and it was learned I was concerned about possible offences under theCanada Business Act.The Act falls under the investigative mandate of the RCMP Commercial Crime Section also located inNewmarket and was being forwarded on to them for review.

I had indeed originally requested the RCMP address the relative issues regarding my former tenant DonWilson president and director of Bio Safe under the Canada Business Corporations Act, Part XIX Paragraph229 (1) having already attempted to get the York Regional Police to deal with Don Wilson under theCriminal Code and Tenant Protection Act, 1997 but they declined to do so.

By the time I went to the RCMP with the November 15 2005 cover letter and evidence I had already triedseveral government departments to address the issues that occurred June 30 2005 at the ORHT but to noavail, so that is the reason I presented the issues in different manner under the Canada Business Act to trymy luck that way.This is all documented on the Golden Rule for Society Gold for Law Society web sitehttp://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-law-society-

under the heading Royal Canadian Mounted Police Compiled A C documents now available on theRCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site along with other pertinent evidence.

You must remember I was just a victim experienced in another field of endeavour with no experience inhow the police carried on business at the time and simply provided the evidence that crimes had beencommitted by my former tenant and president of a company that I had invested in and thought they wouldbe dealt with by professional people in these matters not realizing I had to dot (t) s and cross (i) s and followprocedures I was not aware of or experienced in.I was under the opinion at the time that the people financed all government personnel involved in theadministration and enforcement of the law to be proficient competent responsible and irreproachable with
http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-dispositionhttp://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-forcehttp://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-law-society-http://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-law-society-http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-forcehttp://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition


7/251

7

fortitude and conviction to the safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter of equal protection and benefits consistent with the Constitution and the Police Services Act.My opinion has never wavered.

Police Services ActR.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15

PoliceServicesAct.doc

Declaration of principles

1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles:1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario.

The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.

The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities theyserve.

4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.

It is all about common sense and the law, not aware at the time the absence of it throughout the personnel of the system but with further thought and reason determined it was too consistent to be incompetence andeventually proved it was deliberate organized crime of corruption and conspiracy by members of the LawSocieties beginning in the very first line of the Charter, all documented on the web sites.

The Sergeant Michael Thomson e-mail dated January 18 2006 specifically states that I proposed aninvestigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices of the Canada Business Act and as such investigated theevidence

This information is all published on my web sites that RCMP Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam investigatedand states in his interim report dated May 20 2008 that he felt he should be thorough and thoughtful when

forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence.

Since Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area does not comprehend theneed to be competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction for the safety andwellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms nor is hecompetent to command a police force consistent with the Police Services Act I will just address the issueshe stated in his September 3 2008 Final Letter of Disposition, which is self-evident

In such serious matters of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy well documented andfiled with you on November 8 2007 and studied by Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam in a manner he felt wasthorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence as he states in his interim

report dated May 20 2008, and finally completed on July 11 2008 as stated in the letter from theProfessional Standards Unit signed by Sergeant Karen Delorey, after 8 months of studying the prodigiousamount of irrefutable evidence of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy published onmy web sites that had been provided to Inspector Brian Verheul, Milton detachment via e-mail addressed toSergeant Michael Thomson since January 18 2006 it is incomprehensible that the final 2 page report datedSeptember 3 2008 by Superintendent Robert Davis only contained a little more than one page of relativetext, especially since he states Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam was a veteran investigator.

It states in the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP pamphlet Andree Leduc mailed mewhen confirming my complaint that if the CPC carries out a further investigation an investigator will gather
http://groups.google.com/group/cdf-double-exposure-constitution-document-vs-establishment/web/PoliceServicesAct.dochttp://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/DBLaws/Statutes/French/90p15_f.htm#1.http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/DBLaws/Statutes/French/90p15_f.htm#1.http://groups.google.com/group/cdf-double-exposure-constitution-document-vs-establishment/web/PoliceServicesAct.doc


8/251

8

all the information relevant to the complaint and will conduct interviews with me, the RCMP members(s)involved, and any witnesses.

The pertinent evidence is published on my Charter Democracy Force web sites aforementioned and thereport by Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is now pertinent evidence having spent 8 months studying theevidence thorough and thoughtful and of course he is a pertinent witness to attest that the report the RCMPpresent at the review is in fact the report that he prepared for the investigation of the complaint.Superintendent Robert Davis is also a pertinent witness to attest that the final report he sent me after 1

months reviewing Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdams report is indeed the report he prepared.

I ask that you immediately request a copy of Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdams report to ensure no time isallowed for a fixed new replacement report.A copy of Superintendent Robert Daviss report is enclosed.

It is within your competence to determine if they are consistent with each other.

Address of contents of Superintendent Robert Davis dated September 3 2008

False statements are underlinedParagraphs

Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)The investigator also reviewed numerous documents found on my web sites in order to understand thecircumstances surrounding my complaintThat is what he stated in his May 20 2008 interim reportHe has reviewed Staff Sergeant MacAdams report and wishes to share with me the results.He emphasizes that despite the hundreds of pages of documentation involved in my complaint, the RCMPssole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately.

He is suggesting there is a difference as to how the evidence is examined. The evidence provided toSergeant Michael Thomson up to October 18 2007 when I met with Roy Steinebach is irrefutable to theGovernment Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy even though he refused to take the evidence Ibrought to him that date he said he had access to the evidence that I had been sending to Sergeant MichaelThomsons e-mail address and I could continue to send evidence via the same method, which I did and is allrelevant up to the date I filed the complaint with the commission November 8 2007. I presume he wasinstructed how to handle me before we met on October 7 2007,

Correction: October 18 2007 not October 7 2007perhaps a note on the file. As far as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent Robert Davis

states Inspector Verheul instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the evidence and is therefore

responsible for Sergeant Thomsons actions. Inspector Brian Verheul had plenty of time to confirm whetheror not the evidence was relative to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy. It is yetto be determined if Inspector Verheul acted on his own or consulted with his superiors.)

It is superfluous to just stick with the complaint I filed November 8 2007 against Sergeant Roy Steinebachand Inspector Brian Verheul. They have some splainin to do as does Superintendent Robert Davis that willinevitably lead to their superiors.

I complained of Government corruption and conspiracy and they refused to investigate, and when Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam investigated the evidence thorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions


9/251

9

based on the relevant evidence, in order to determine which was relevant he had to be thorough andthoughtful as he stated he was.

That remains to be seen but Superintendent Robert Daviss report is self- evident he is not.

I reiterate all police have a responsibility to be consistent with the Police Services Act and the Constitutionconducive to every individuals guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits and it is eachpersons superior that is responsible to see that they are competent responsible and irreproachable with

fortitude and conviction to every individual as guaranteed with particular attention to victims, attentive toany flaws in the system that should be addressed to prevent such reoccurrences to some other individual.





2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they

serve.4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.

Obviously Inspector Robert Davis has insulted my intelligence and demonstrated hisincompetence for success as either the bad or good guy.

You will see in many of my writings I presumed the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot had beenconsulted and it was he who actually is behind the refusal to investigate along with Minister of PublicSafety and so on right up to the DOJ and higher.

Staff Sergeant MacAdams investigation revealed when I attended the Toronto North Detachment onOctober 18 2007 and met with Sergeant Steinbach, it was not to make a new complaint but rather to providemore documents with respect to the same complaint I had previously made to the Commercial CrimeSection (CCS). I was advised in 2006 that CCS would not be investigating this complaint and I wasprovided with the rationale for that decision being informed the Department of Justice had been consultedprior to responding to me.

As previously stated only the first file I provided to Inspector Peter Goulet dated November 152005 made reference to the Canada Business Act issues that Sergeant Michael Thomsonaddressed in his report on January 18 2006.

From then on it was all about Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and the refusal of the YRP, OPP, RCMP and many government departments and agencies to deal with the issues which led tothe Ontario Attorney General who advises them all and he is the guardian of the public interest which herefuses to guard.

5a) Sergeant Steinbach declined to take more documents and explained the CCS Intake process tome.I printed out the evidence to take down to him because the RCMP web site stated they do nottake evidence by e-mail.He refused to take the evidence stating he already had it because the evidence I had been
http://groups.google.com/group/cdf-double-exposure-constitution-document-vs-establishment/web/PoliceServicesAct.dochttp://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/DBLaws/Statutes/French/90p15_f.htm#1.http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/DBLaws/Statutes/French/90p15_f.htm#1.http://groups.google.com/group/cdf-double-exposure-constitution-document-vs-establishment/web/PoliceServicesAct.doc


10/251

10

sending via Sergeant Michael Thomsons e-mail address was being kept on file and healready had a copy of the recording of the ORHT hearing that I provided with the November15 2005 evidence I gave toInspector Peter Goulet.

5b) He did however tell me that he felt that my complaint was too vague and over reachingand that it did not meet the CCS Investigational mandate.He refused to look at the evidence I brought with me and the evidence on the web sites isnot vague at all.

He did not state the evidence was vague and over reaching and the evidence irrefutablyproves his opinion as to the relevancy of Government Organized Crime of corruption andconspiracy is valueless and I suspect that he is not all that familiar with the file and was

just acting on instructions.5c). He also told me that there was already a file open regarding my allegations and went on to

explain that it did not necessarily mean that the RCMP was going to investigate the complaint.(Sergeant Steinbach told me for certain the RCMP was not going to investigate the complaint)

6) Inspector Verheul did not deal with me directly, but he did provide direction to SergeantThomson, my principle contact person, that if material being submitted continues to relate to the

issues already reviewed then nothing further should be done than to place a copy of the

correspondence on the file.As previously mentioned Inspector Verheul is responsible for Sergeant Thomsons actions and when Ibrought the matter to his attention prior to filing the complaint he should have looked into it and he has hadplenty of time since as he has been provided all the evidence the same as the rest of the people whose e-mailaddresses are in the AAAAAALIST document published on the original Charter Democracy Force web site

7) In the course of his investigation Staff Sergeant MacAdam also determined that my initialcomplaint involving my investment in Mr. Wilsons company and the Ontario Rental Housing andTenants Act dispute was reviewed and that I was advised in writing that the matter was mostappropriately handled through the civil provisions provided for in the noted statute and that no

criminal investigation would be undertaken

I presume reference is being made to Sergeant Michael Thomsons January 18 2006 e-mail again.He has to fill in the report somehow. Heaven knows I am not referring to reiterations being particularlyreiterative myself. I am noting the struggle to put something to paper that looks legitimately convincing.

8) When I was not satisfied with that response I wrote back the same day and Sergeant Thomsonwrote his second letter dated February 7th 2006, further explaining that if I suspect criminalactivity, the police service with primary jurisdiction would be responsible for investigating theallegations and it seems the Ontario Provincial Police had also reviewed my complaint and hadreferred me to the York Regional Police as the police services of jurisdiction. It was establishedas well that I had met with the YRP previously and was told that the matter was civil and that

they would not be conducting an investigation.

I do not seem to have a copy of that letter in my computer files, perhaps in my 3 stack of hard copy but it isirrelative.The police sent me in circles as to who had the authority whereas the YRP was the original police force of

jurisdiction but they have persistently refused to look into the Government Organized Crime of corruptionand conspiracy, the same as the OPP and the RCMP whereas they all have been provided the sameevidence.

After careful consideration of the details surrounding my complaint, he finds no evidence thatindicates that Sergeant Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and furthermore hesupports Inspector Verheuls directives, given the nature of the file and the documentation being


11/251

11

provided.There you have it, after careful consideration he finds no evidence that indicates that Sergeant Steinebach orInspector Verheul acted improperly and further more he supports Inspector Verheuls directives.Was it he Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander Greater Toronto Area that gave the order notto investigate? Was it an obvious decision for him? Did he need to bother consulting with his superiors?That is yet to be determined!!

If I wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so bycontacting the CPU at the Ottawa office

Of course I wish to exercise my right!!!That is what this all about. Right?

I see Inspector Brian Verheul is retired now ( bottom of his 2nd page).Before Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam finished the investigation he was provided a new job( See his May 202008 interim report) with NCO i/c after his name as Occupational Health and Safety Services O Division/ Return to Work/Medical Discharge Facilitator of Occupational Health and Safety Services O Division

As predictable as the likelihood of people becoming victims with government members of the LawSocieties holding every position of authority in the legal system who are not required to give a damn aboutevery individuals guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits nor is the Law Society of UpperCanada required to examine evidence provided in support of complaints against their members.

See the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document published on the original Charter Democracy Forceweb site.

CanLaw National Lawyer Referral Service confirmed this on their web site www.canlaw.com and I copied other evidence from their site, which they were not too happy about which you will seepublished on the Charter Democracy Force web site.

All evidence referred herein is published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites and was e-mailed toeveryone on the aforementioned AAAAAALIST and they were provided with the web site addresses theywould be published on.**********************************************************************************It is predictable you of the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP will be orchestrated bythe superiors of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy as it is apparent theyalready caused Andree Leduc to not cooperate with me.

You will find that information on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site or referenced where youwill find all the evidence stated herein, and quite probably more.

The evidence is irrefutable of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and with theRCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 they are securely implicated in the conspiracy.

Now it is your turn to provide us the irrefutable evidence of the Commission for Public Complaints Againstthe RCMP for the public to see which you really have no choice but to cooperate with the conspiracy orcooperate consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individuals guaranteed Charter rights.

Of course this document will be e-mailed to everyone on the AAAAALIST and many others.
http://www.canlaw.com/http://www.canlaw.com/


12/251

12

I will expect acknowledgement of receipt of the first page of this document informing you where the rest of it is published and the other pertinent evidence.Should you have any problems with the links to the documents or web sites please do not hesitate to contactme at [email protected]

The same if you need any help understanding the evidence or should you require more evidence, anything atall please do not hesitate to contact me.

Frank GallagherManagerCharter Democracy Force

PS

You have more than enough to demand a Public Inquiry if you can find someone you can demand.Perhaps you can find a way to get the information to the media.

You will read throughout the correspondence every government department and agency suggesting I get alawyer and deal with my personal issues, as they like to say, in civil court.

The July 26 2008 Saturday Star headlined the serious situation that the Middle Class cannot afford to accessthe civil courts costing $60,000 for 3 days and the media who are on the AAAALIST have also beenprovided the evidence of precisely what I informed them more than three years ago which they attempt toorchestrate themselves out of this one.

Invariably everything they do is corrupt and they have no choice but to continue in their ways when they areconfronted but the jig is up.

There is always the option of finally doing things legal consistent with the Constitution conducive to everyindividuals guaranteed Charter rights.

That would require restructuring and come right out and fess the truth something they are not familiar withso it could be somewhat clumsy.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


13/251

13

From : Michael Thomson Sent : January 18, 2006 12:51:19 PM

To :

CC : "Mona Eichmann"

Subject : BioSafe Natural Products Inc./ Bio-Safe Natural TechnologiesInc.

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

I have reviewed the documents, forwarded to our office here, that were submitted to our NewmarketDetachment. You have proposed an investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices of the CanadaBusiness Corporations Act, Chapter C-44 (CBCA) and as such, this matter has been taken by our office forreview.

A review of the matter has been completed and the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been consulted interms of prosecution under the jurisdiction of this Act.Unfortunately, Part XIX, and Section 229(1) CBCA and thereafter of the Act is quite specific in the terms of the investigation and enforcement of same. This is entirely a civil procedure that requires the Court to issue

an Investigation Order and thereafter appoint an Inspector. The Inspector has specific authorization allowingentry and examination of the corporation's books and records. These duties are outlined in Section 130(1)CBCA. Part XIX.1 outlines the apportioning of the award of damages, and Part XX outlines remedies,offences and punishment.

Mr. Donald Wilsons assertions that a subpoena and/or a search warrant are required in order to allow theshareholders to review the companies' books and records are erroneous, as outlined in Section 21 (1-10)CBCA.

It is the judgment of DOJ and this office that this matter lies solely within the confines of civil litigationalprocedures, and as such, DOJ will not consider prosecuting this matter and no investigation will be

undertaken by this office. An attempt has been made to verbally convey this message via telephone,however the number provided appears to be the number of a fax machine. The information provided will bekept on file for intelligence/ information purposes only. If you have any further questions, these may bedirected to the Writer atthe numbers listed below.

Yours truly,

M.J. Thomson, Sgt.NCO i/c Central Intake & Admin. Support.

Greater Toronto Area - Commercial Crime Section,Milton, Ontario(905) 876-9656(905) 876-9757 (Fax)[email protected]
http://by114fd.bay114.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&a=bed378f4aa7ae8c205cf394937ab963b649074f06d1462617bb55c2922c7425d&mailto=1&[email protected]&msg=5F984C95-C8F6-451D-BDD6-4EFCF99D5FC1&start=0&len=3420&src=&type=xhttp://by114fd.bay114.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&a=bed378f4aa7ae8c205cf394937ab963b649074f06d1462617bb55c2922c7425d&mailto=1&[email protected]&msg=5F984C95-C8F6-451D-BDD6-4EFCF99D5FC1&start=0&len=3420&src=&type=x


14/251


15/251

15

.You will notice how FFF, Forthright Forthcoming and Forthwith I endeavour to be expecting the same inreturn and of course when not, it is painfully obvious and though I would prefer appropriate action from youI have learned to settle for more evidence as if I didnt have enough already.

From the tone of my writing it is hoped you will comprehend that what concerns me does concern you oneway or another and all I can do is hope that you understand that I am a victim requesting justice as detailedon the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name (Now www.URus.ca ) and 10 affiliate sites

although in reference to the evidence originally attached to the complaints you will find it on the originalCharter Democracy Force site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

There is sufficient evidence there that demands the RCMP look into in the 15 Lawyer Files and the Mad,Glad mostly Sad.Why document that asks many questions Why that need to be formally answered eventhough they answer themselves.

I have made note of some very significant serious problems within the upper command of the RCMP in thefollowing pages, which includes a copy of their Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008.

I believe considering your admittance of incompetence that this is a case of rare circumstance and at the

discretion of the Chair of the CPC request the CPC become involved and conduct its own investigation inthe public interest or conduct a public interest hearing or both.

Please acknowledge receipt and your intent to cooperate

Thank youFrank Gallagher
http://www.cdf.name/http://www.urus.ca/http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-forcehttp://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-forcehttp://www.urus.ca/http://www.cdf.name/


16/251


17/251

17

The painful obviousness of that which is predictable becomes pathetically more nauseating when proventrue.One charged with a crime can not be judged by the amoral and most definitely not by oneself.

CONSISTENCY to evade the purpose of truthwith irrelevant unfounded truths consistentlyreveals the truth whether they are truths or lieswhere Reality is the truth impervious toperception yet precisely due to perception.

When ones mandate is to meet with a personto pay them back $5 owed and finds themlying in the street in pain a competent reporton the incident, no matter how thorough tomandated purpose should include mention of the victim, how he or she got there, and whatinitiatives were taken to secure their safetyand wellbeing and was there any obvioushazards that could be removed to ensure noreoccurrence.

Due diligence to a purpose when the safetyand wellbeing of every individual is severely

jeopardized weighs heavy on the ability of anauthority assigned responsibility and thereport is self-evident


18/251

18


19/251

19

Priority





The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charterof Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.

The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communitiesthey serve.

4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.

In which way does a preponderance of paper proliferated with words protect every individual as guaranteed

by the Charter?

Of what purpose are such words and those found in the Constitution if staff is without principles?15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equalbenefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, nationalor ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.Incompetence is a relatively simple matter to deal with when competence is the quest by all concerned

Deliberate incompetence is a simpler matter to deal with when incompetence is the quest by all concerned

When there is an obvious CONSISTENCY of incompetence it could very well be the person who perceives

the CONSISTENCY of incompetence to be obvious is personally consistently incompetent.52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with theprovisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.Considering every individuals safety and well being is at stake consistent CONSISTENCY of those peopleassigned the responsibility to protect every individual equally as guaranteed is mandatory either stated orimplied.Similarly and most assuredly government personnel financed to administer and enforce the provisions of theConstitution must be competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and convictionmeaning they must be aware of their legitimate purpose and the serious ramifications upon society shouldthe CONSISTENCY not be consistently monitored and maintained.

The consequences of neglect are of the most serious nature to the public interest and most assuredly theAttorney General of Ontario is the guardian of the public interest as the Roles and Responsibilities of theAttorney General published on the Ontario web site attests.

CONSISTENCY is also prerequisite in the safety and wellbeing of personnel involved in the governmentorganized crime of corruption and conspiracy.

The evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force was collected by me Frank Gallagher who becamelucidly alert on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal hearing to the fact I had beenvictimized by my former tenant DON Wilson president of a company I had invested in.
http://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-law-society-/web/PoliceServicesAct.dochttp://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/DBLaws/Statutes/French/90p15_f.htm#1.http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/DBLaws/Statutes/French/90p15_f.htm#1.http://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-law-society-/web/PoliceServicesAct.doc


20/251

20

Over a period of three years I presented the irrefutable evidence of the crimes to a preponderance of

prominent government personnel, media and others whose e-mail addresses in the AAAAALIST documentare published on the original Charter Democracy Force web sitehttp://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

The CONSISTENCY of their do not give a damn attitude about the Constitution and the individuals equalguaranteed Charter rights indicative of the spirit that emanates from the Law Society of Upper Canada

demonstrated in the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document is overwhelming and patheticallyincomprehensible in terms of incompetence and ignorance to legitimate purpose.

So overwhelming that stretches far beyond the realm that such incompetence could be achieved naturallyand already certain there was much more to this than meets the eye turned my efforts to divulge the root of the problem that led me right back to that which was immediately apparent at the beginning that the officeof the Attorney General of Ontario was behind it all, being advisor to the Minister of Municipal Affairs andHousing John Gerretsen who was responsible to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997but demonstrated an irresponsible indifference to his responsibility.

This is all detailed in the 15 Lawyer Files, which we are all quite familiar with by now. Right?

Well to save me time and everyone else concerned the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Forceirrefutably proves the incompetence of the entire legal system to protect every individual equally asguaranteed by the Charter but at the same time demonstrates an uncanny CONSISTENCY to protect everyindividual involved in the conspiracy from the people adverse to the moral legitimate purpose that they havethe people believe

So CONSISTENT and so obvious that any sane person of moral thought and reason can discern the truththat what we have here in Canada is government organized crime personified.

The RCMP who studied the evidence since I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the

RCMP November 8 2007 not November 7 2007 as suggested in their Final Letter of Disposition had towade through the evidence which was apparently either over their heads or was simply of no concern tothem as they did their Law Society rendition of pathetic injustice oblivious to The Spirit of the Law andthe vital role evidence plays.

Well, the RCMP had an opportunity to show their stuff and blew it miserably incompetent to the conspiracyand most assuredly no semblance at all to what is expected of a competent responsible irreproachable entityof fortitude and conviction in continuity to support a moral society conducive to every individualsguaranteed equal Charter rights.

Such lame excuses to avoid addressing the major issues and even in what amounts to a one full page of

response maintains an inconsistency with actual fact, but then competence to any purpose is not expected of them from their superiors so what you see is what you get and the public has no choice but to forget it andmove on to retain their sanity.

Perhaps all the inconsistencies are deliberately entered to draw ones attention to them and would be of noavail to argue, petty in nature distracting from the obvious serious issues they obviously never intend toaddress.Perhaps they are intended to infuriate me so I will respond insanely providing them opportunity to divert theissues to a mental instability.
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-forcehttp://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force


21/251

21

Well, that does not work absolutely inane to competent responsible irreproachable sane moral purpose.

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception

The truth cannot change but perceptions are vulnerable and fickle things.They will allow you to believe you are cunning intelligent above many, provide you confidence andarroganceand stuff like that.

Simple fact is it will betray you.

Do not believe?

Have a serious look at the Final Letter of Disposition from the point of view of an individual of the moralmajority who once believed their Charter rights secure and were treated fairly as if in a democracy.

The government organized crime has clearly been proven to be initiated at the top but its success isdependent on the ignorance and cooperation of the ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE.

As the economy gets worse nature will take its course as history attests and be assured we of the Charter

Democracy Force will humongously increase our efforts to the resolve necessary to prevention of thepredictable unnecessary chaos.

One has to wonder if terrorists is just a word attached to groups who are well aware that sane peacefulinitiatives to fair sane moral purpose of sane moral thought and reason is impossible with greedy imbecilesdevoid of conscience inept to sane moral thought and reason.

It seems to me the manipulative abilities of international corporate conglomerates and the humongousadvantage the affluent and influential have illegitimately over the people of the Lower Tiers the WorldTrade Center was a likely target when the people are driven insane by the insanity of it all left unchecked.

Anyway, the people have a right to know what is published on the Charter Democracy Force web site andwith phase one now complete with the irrefutable evidence the upper echelon of the RCMP are involved wecan now direct our efforts full time to spreading the truth and we thank you for that for making it so vividlyclear.

This document ReceivedSeptember102008 will be published in its appropriate place on the RCMP FinalLetter of Disposition web site http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition

I need not mention how severely disappointed we are but nothing we had not expected and certainly nothing

we were not prepared for.

We will give the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP one more opportunity todemonstrate their incompetence to serve the people consistent with the Constitution and of course make aformal request to the RCMP Commissioner to investigate the government organized crime as evidenced onthe Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name (Now www.URus.ca ), which Robert Davis,Superintendent, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area was kind enough to admit as did Staff SergeantR.B. MacAdam that you have possession of the evidence or access of all the evidence on the web sites buthave chosen to ignore it with blinders on and chose to emphasize your sole mandate was to determinewhether or not the members acted appropriately
http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-dispositionhttp://www.cdf.name/http://www.urus.ca/http://www.urus.ca/http://www.cdf.name/http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition


22/251

22

This is how my first conversation with Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam began when he phoned me to see if Iwould come down to the Newmarket office to discuss the complaint and now 10 months later theincompetence remains..

It was about 3 weeks after he began looking into it on a part time basis he informed and at first I agreed togo down, but when I asked if he had looked at the evidence on the web site he said no, he was just investingthe complaint against the RCMP members.

He had not yet talked to the 2 RCMP members and not looked at the evidence and he wants me to comedown.I questioned how could he possibly determine if they acted appropriately with out looking at the evidenceand of course the Law Society of Upper Canada is of the belief their member acted appropriately withoutlooking at the evidence and we see a significant CONSISTENCY throughout that evidence appears to beirrelevant when members of the Law Societies are involved as the Attorney General who plays a major roleadvising all government departments and agencies.

I told him he would first have to determine if the evidence was valid to the complaint or considered trivial,frivolous or vexatious which I cited from the Complaints Commission brochure.

You state Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is a veteran investigator which hardly supports your intendedpurpose when logically in the peoples minds evidence plays a major role in investigations and if yourveteran investigators are not aware the public are in serious trouble.

OOPS: They are in serious trouble arent they?

All that has been noted is the pathetic incompetence of the person assigned to the investigation and for thathe gets a promotion and I can expand that to see how you made it to District Commander.

There can be no doubt you are aware of the conspiracy because you would have to be an imbecile not to

understand what is going on if you are familiar with the evidence.

Of course that has crossed my mind in earlier writings that for the government organized crime to besuccessful persons in you positions have to be selected from the incompetent or cooperative to theconspiracy permitting its persistent existence.

You have made reference to issues being discussed with the DOJ, which is absurd as the evidence clearlyshows the DOJ and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada are major players in theconspiracy.

I know it appears that I am addressing these issues to you in an effort to make you people understand the

error of your ways but we know you are well aware, however it is imperative the public clearly understandsand it is to that endeavor I am most attentive.

I presume your efforts are addressed similarly and I have to inform you the intended recipients of thisinformation are hardly as dumb as they would have to be to comprehend any reason for you not to act ontheir behalf consistent with the Constitution.

Meanwhile I am requesting every recipient to jump in and act appropriately on behalf of the people inlegitimate support of the sanctity of the Canadian Constitution.


23/251


24/251

24

Anyway I leave you all to ponder your decisions while we test the Complaints Commission.


PS

I did make mention I am not satisfied with your incompetent irresponsible trivial, frivolous vexatious FinalLetter of Disposition didnt I?

I suppose the obvious does not require the formality.

If I seem a little frustrated and perhaps a bit irate perhaps if we looked at the evidence we could determinethe cause and help me out.

OOPS, silly me, I keep forgetting you are not required to give a damn but when the opportunity arises makea kind gesture.

One more time I state unless the evidence that had been provided to the RCMP up until October 18 2007has been thoroughly examined as to its validity of the charges of government organized crime of corruptionand conspiracy the RCMP have demonstrated their incompetence to protect the public interest.

Obviously the District Commander provides a good example of the incompetence that must run rampantthroughout the force.

We cannot have that, can we?


25/251


26/251

26


27/251

27


28/251

28

October 7 2008

ReviewsCommission for Public ComplaintsAgainst [email protected]

Re: File Nos. PC-2007-2316 & PC-2007-2317

Government Organized CrimeCorruption and Conspiracy

Dear Reviews

Your letter by Canada Post dated September 24 2008 states you have requested the RCMP to forward youthe pertinent evidence pursuant to my request where urgency is of the essence to ensure there is no time forthe RCMP and other conspirators to manipulate the evidence.

I am most concerned that you should now have secured a copy of RCMP Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdams

report who was assigned by the office of the RCMP Commissioner to investigate my complaint.

The Staff Sergeant spent 8 months studying the evidence and it is germane to the complaint as to hiscompetence to review the evidence consistent with the Constitution in support of every individualsguaranteed Charter rights.

As the evidence on the Charter Democracy Force web sites irrefutably proves the entire government modusoperandi is consistent with that of the Law Society of Upper Canada, which has been documented andpublished as the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document.

In this document they clearly state or imply that their members are not required to give a damn about the

individuals guaranteed Charter rights nor is evidence relevant to their decisions when it is against theirmembers.

The Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General published on the Ontario web site clearly states heis responsible as the guardian of the public interest and the guardian of the rule of law to protect everyindividual and society as a whole and yet he has been provided the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canadadocument along with a preponderance of other evidence which he has refused to deal with consistent withthe Constitution conducive to the support of every individuals guaranteed Charter rights.

He is the advisor of all Cabinet Ministers, government departments and agencies who have all refused todeal with these most serious issues and I expect no different from your Reviews office consistent with the

conspiracy.

You have more than just the responsibility to study the evidence published on the webs sites to coherency todetermine if the RCMP have acted appropriately conducive to the protection of every individual asguaranteed by the Charter as it imperative that you demonstrate due diligence to the support of everyindividuals guaranteed Charter rights particularly since the evidence highly suggests you will not becooperative with me as it is impossible to do so and remain consistent with the conspiracy.

Once again the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site irrefutably proves theconspiracy and all government personnel who have responded to the evidence have had precisely the same

www.cdf.name
http://www.cdf.name/http://www.cdf.name/


29/251

29

evidence to review and their responses or no responses is self evident they are not competent responsibleand irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the Constitution conducive to every individualsguaranteed Charter rights, however they have all been consistent with the conspiracy conducive to itssuccess.

The evidence clearly shows due diligence to the conspiracy clearly orchestrated from the office of theMinister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the office of the Ontario Attorney Generalregarding the issues I have presented relative to incidents that occurred in Ontario.

The RCMP Superintendents Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008, less than 2 pages of context is incomprehensible clearly demonstrating that he is not competent responsible and irreproachablewith fortitude and conviction consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individuals guaranteedCharter rights however it irrefutably proves he is consistent with the conspiracy.

On the other hand the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site attests that I have beencompetent responsible irreproachable with fortitude and conviction consistent with the Constitutionconducive to every individuals guaranteed Charter rights where we comprehend the significance of evidence and the necessity of its acquisition to support allegations and have applied every effort to obtainingpertinent evidence to ensure the truth, the whole truth is being provided for all to see and act appropriately.

To maintain our consistency to the Constitution conducive to every individuals guaranteed Charter rightsand our attentiveness to competent responsible and irreproachable approach with fortitude and convictionwe request confirmation you are now in receipt of the pertinent evidence requested from the RCMP withrelative information confirming the date that you received it.

Consistent with democracy and equality guaranteed by the Charter I request a copy of the evidence acquiredfrom the RCMP relative to my complaint where I am particularly interested in the contents of RCMP Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdams report after 8 months of studying the pertinent evidence.

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception

It is imperative that we know whether or not his perception of what he was to accomplish is consistent withthe Constitution conducive to every individuals guaranteed Charter rights or not.

If you do not comprehend this then your perception is not adept to these most serious issues.

I remind you that laws, policies, procedures and normal routines set out by the conspirators are of no forceor effect as to their inconsistencies with the Constitution

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with theprovisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

I request you consider wisely before you make a decision not to cooperate with me consistent with theConstitution conducive to every individuals guaranteed Charter rights.

I request immediate acknowledgement of receipt of this documentRequestReviewsProvideEvidenceOctober72008 published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition website under heading Reviews Correspondence

I also request immediate confirmation as to whether or not you are in now in possession of the evidencerequested from the RCMP and whether or not you intend to immediately forward the requested evidence tome.


30/251

30

Thank you


PS

It is imperative you and everyone understands the present financial crisis cannot be dealt with appropriatelyby the conspirators that caused it who will invariably be attentive to the preservation of their own asses andtheir own financial well being, as always humongously detrimental to the safety and wellbeing of theindividual and society as a whole.

They must be exposed and appropriate action taken to ensure competent responsible people with fortitudeand conviction to the Constitution and our Charter rights are provided the authority to lead us out of thefinancial crisis hugely detrimental to world peace and the well being of the world populace.


31/251

31

To: The Chief of Police

The unscrupulous Government members of the Law Societies and their unscrupulous counterparts world wide are responsible forpresent reality as certain as always as history attests where:

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perceptionTheir insatiable quest for wealth and power in cooperation with the affluent and influential and multinational corporateconglomerates have manipulated the markets indifferent to the safety and wellbeing of the people of the Lower Tiers and now whentheir manipulations are back firing on them, they who have been ransacking us to poverty reveal they have always had the money todeal with poverty and prove their indifference to poverty by now pulling out the money to save their asses. They are only coherentto poverty when it nears them and justice will be learned the hard way.

Can we trust the people who have been irrefutably proven to be unscrupulous back stabbing cancers upon society to actresponsibility all of a sudden for Society or will they use their BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY ploy tokeep their unscrupulous Law Societies luxuriously secure and us in poverty to the bitter end?

Quite a responsibility for the Chair of their Commission. Such a serious issue belongs to the democratic moral majority

Public Inquiry warranted and demanded

Only the conspirators will object and thereby thrust themselvesupon their own swords

This was well worth the wait, but unfortunately society has paid fartoo much for the pleasure and cannot afford to wait any longer.

Expediency is of the essence

PUBLIC INQUIRY NOW!!!!


32/251

32

Royal Canadian Mounted Police

From: Frank Gallagher (Share holder) BioSafe Natural Products Inc./Bio-SafeNatural Technologies Inc (Exhibit A1 & Exhibit A2))34 Riverglen DriveKeswick,OnL4P 2P8905-476-8959

[email protected]

November 15 2005

RE: BioSafe Natural Products Inc. Corporation # 6159206 BN #871599601RC0001dated November 13 2003 Registered Office Address (A1) Still active

Donald Wilson12 Tower CourtBradford,ON.L3Z 2V2 Canada

and

Bio-Safe Natural Technologies Inc. corporation # 6186581 BN864226600RC0001dated January 27 2004 Registered Office Address (A2) Still active

Donald Wilson16715-12 Yonge ST #260NewmarketOntario L3X 1X4Canada

Dear

I, a major share holder of the above named corporations am applying for an investigation of Don Wilsonpresident and director of the same under the Canada Business Corporations Act ,Part XIX Paragraph 229 (1)

The charges include:2(a) Don Wilson president, director ,etc has intended to defraud his share holders

(b) Don Wilson, power of the director has been exercised in a manner that isoppressive or unfairly prejudicial to or that unfairly disregards the interests of asecurity holder.

(d) Don Wilson, president, director ,etc. acted fraudulently or dishonestly.

It is a long story that I have to tell and I have an abundance of evidence to support my allegations in 2(a)(b)and (d) above but in the interest of brevity I offer two agreements signed by Don Wilson and myself Frank Gallagher .

1) The May 6 2005 witnessed by my mother Edythe Gallagher (Exhibit Z1) (4 pages)2) The April 13 2005 witnessed by Dave Kirby. (Exhibit Z)

Note that pages 2 and 4 were revised and signed on April 27 2005 and witnessed by

This document along with accompanyingevidence denoted in ( ) was hand delivered to

P. Goulet, Insp. RCMP January 3 2006


33/251

33

my mother Edythe Gallagher. (6 pages) original pages 2 and 4 are included.

These two agreements are similar in content with changes made to percentages of commission etc. andrecords updated.

It is prudent to use the April 13 2005 agreement as case in point because I introduced it as evidence at anOntario Housing Rental Tribunal hearing on June 30 2005.

Don Wilson denied ever seeing the May 6 2005 agreement and the April 13 2005 agreement at the hearing.

I introduced Dave Kirby to the judicator as the person who signed the April 13 2005 as witness.

Dave Kirby stated that he did witness Don Wilson signing all 4 pages of the agreement.

This is all a matter of record and I have a copy of the record on CD provided by the Tribunal.

I had entered these documents to support my application to evict the said Don Wilson for failure to pay merent for approximately a year and to support my claim that he had agreed to leave my premises by the end of May 2005.

It is important to note that Don Wilson signed these documents with a different signature than he has usedon previous documents

His denial of ever seeing these documents is powerful supporting evidence of my allegations.

I should also mention that at the hearing Don Wilson reiterated the words on his dispute (Z2) which he hadfiled with the Tribunal to argue my application for his eviction and he also stated that he had the documentsto prove his statements.

I was amazed at the ease he spewed out his fabrication which surely would have been enviously nose

worthy to Pinochio.

Of course Don Wilson had no documents to prove his lies and of course I had and did present the evidenceto dispute his dispute.

The Order under Section 69 Tenant Protection Act, 1997 (Z3) File # TNL-67103 found for me ordering DonWilson to leave my premises and to pay me back rent.

Although this hearing was to determine matters relative to rental accommodation it would be reasonable tosay that the May 6 2005 and the April 13 2005 agreements which Don Wilson (Bio-Safe) had denied everseeing played a decisive role in the findings of the Order when I was able to prove that he did indeed sign

them and the contents within, relative to the rental hearing were verified by supporting documentation.

The CD of the hearing is recorded evidence of Don Wilsons dishonesty which far surpasses rental mattersand supports my allegations under the Ontario Business Corporations Act.

The contents of these documents (May 6 2005 and April 13 2005) also reflect the issues of concern thatbecame apparent over time since I first invested with BioSafe Natural Products Inc. on the 7th of January2004.My final agreement with BioSafe Natural Products Inc. on February 11 2004 issues me a total of 30,000,000shares which includes the original shares acquired by me on the 7th of January 2004


34/251

34

It is also important to note that Don Wilson had registered a new company above as BioSafe NaturalTechnologies Inc. on January 27 2004 just a couple of weeks before I went all in but my shares were still of the Products corporation.

I also represent many friends who I have introduced to Don Wilson who have invested since then. Theirdocuments have the BioSafe Natural Technologies Inc. name on their agreements and I am listed as a shareholder on their documents. Others listed before me have an unstable number of shares as they show

differently on each agreement.

It is also important to note that none of the certificates provided to us are on the proper form, nor are theysigned except for one which is signed but has no certificate number.

You will also note that none of the agreements reflect the registered name of the corporation which is Bio-Safe Natural Technologies Inc.

Note the dash in Bio-Safe

I wonder if it is more than coincidence that this name is only used on his tax return account # 9317185

Donald Wilson16715-12 Yonge St, 260 (Ab)

and his

TD Canada Trust account # 3102-5208016 Bio-Safe. I am not sure of the 8 (Ca)His TD access card # 1305-432-422-098 shows BIO-SAFE NATURAL TECHNOLOG

DONALD WILSON

Don Wilson has also informed my mother and I on several occasions that we will be sorry for evicting him

and that I will never see anything from this business.

He has also told me that it will take me 10 years in court to unscramble the documentation which could verywell go beyond my demise. That would be a hell of a way to spend my remaining years.

I have plenty of evidence (documents) which lend credence to this but the documentation clearly shows hisdishonesty and more.

I have a document signed on 21st day of March 21 2005 by Donald Neil Wilson, PresidentBioSafe Natural Technologies Inc.

headed Proprietary Technology Declaration (Za) which states that all the intellectual property, know how,process technology etc. are the sole property of Donald Neil Wilson.

I do not believe that he has the best interest of share holders at heart.

It is also important to note that there is no way that I can get information from Don Wilson (Bio-Safe)I had provided him 6 months free rent in my basement from February 1 2004 to July 31 2004 to allow himmore time for research.


35/251

35

He was to pay me $800 per month since but I finally had him evicted on August 18 2005 owing me morethan $10,000 for rent.

He also owes me another $10,000 + or for promissory notes, phone bills etc .

He refuses to pay.

He refuses to provide me and my friends with proper documents for our shares.

He has never held a share holders meeting since I first invested on the 7th of January 2004.I have requested that he do so on several occasions and I have asked to see the company books.

He told me to get a subpoena.

I have asked for a copy of the certificate of incorporation and a list of the share holders, their addresses andthe number of shares that they own but he refuses to deliver.

Before he was evicted from my place I wrote him several times requesting that he complies and I requestedthat he hold a meeting to elect a director which is required by law before 18 months has passed since

registration.

Note: The registered address of the business is a post office box on Yonge Street as above.

One of my friends attempted to contact him by registered mail at this address which was returned to sender.after approximately 15 days.(Z4)

I know where he moved to when he was evicted from my place on August 18 2005 but I would not bewelcome there and I resist the urge to write him lest he moves to hinder investigation.

He would not leave a forwarding address and my attempt to follow him failed.

I was fortunate that he moved to a house on a main road and by luck I spotted his vehicle there on a latersearch, not all that far from where I lost him.

I make this point to make it known that if not for my detective work his and BioSafes where abouts may gounknown hindering prosecution and recovery of money that he owes me.

I wonder what address may appear on his drivers license. Perhaps post box # 260 unit 12 at 16715 YongeSt.

His last known address is 4021 Stoufville Road and his 1994 white Cadilac has plate # ASKA 151.

I could go on and on, but already I have surpassed brevity.

I hope that the evidence provided herein will be sufficient to warrant a proper investigation of Don Wilson,president and director of Bio-Safe Technologies Inc.

Yours truly,Frank GallagherTo: Chief of Police, OPP Chief of Police, RCMP


36/251

36

From: Frank Gallagher

34 Riverglen DriveKeswick,ONL4P 2P8 905-476-8959

January 3 2006

Dear Chief

I am a major investor in BIO-SAFE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

I have proven in a lower court of the Province of Ontario that the president and director DON WILSON hasfiled false and misleading documents to argue his case with the Ontario Housing Rental Tribunal.

During the hearing I introduced two documents which DON had signed with a false signature. He deniedever seeing or signing them.

I introduced a witness to one of the documents who attested that Don did sign them.

The contents of these documents represents a monetary value surpassing $150,000and his actions at the hearing can only be defined as crooked by any rational person.

I have written a few public offices with the hope of finding someone who may be concerned but at this pointit seems that there is nothing illegal about this.

The Tribunal found for me and Don was ordered to pay me $10,000 +/- but leave it up to me to try andcollect.

I have attempted to get various departments to investigate him further but to no avail.

There is a con man loose in society which I have provided the evidence beyond any reasonable doubt in aprovincial court that he has taken money from me and about 20 other investors with the obvious intention of denying our investments.

I have enclosed copies of the correspondence between Armand P. LA BARGE, Chief of Police, York Region and myself and a CD of the hearing.

I would appreciate that you have a look at it with the hope that you see cause to investigate this mansoperation. An early response at your convenience would be nice.

I personally do not have the resources to do the job.

There is no doubt that there is a criminal at large. I have identified him and located him for you.

Yours respectfully


37/251

37

Frank GallagherTo: Chief of Police, OPP Chief of Police, RCMP

From: Frank Gallagher34 Riverglen DriveKeswick,ONL4P 2P8 905-476-8959

January 3 2006

Dear Chief

I am a major investor in BIO-SAFE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

I have proven in a lower court of the Province of Ontario that the president and director DON WILSON hasfiled false and misleading documents to argue his case with the Ontario Housing Rental Tribunal.

During the hearing I introduced two documents which DON had signed with a false signature. He deniedever seeing or signing them.

I introduced a witness to one of the documents who attested that Don did sign them.

The contents of these documents represents a monetary value surpassing $150,000and his actions at the hearing can only be defined as crooked by any rational person.

I have written a few public offices with the hope of finding someone who may be concerned but at this pointit seems that there is nothing illegal about this.

The Tribunal found for me and Don was ordered to pay me $10,000 +/- but leave it up to me to try andcollect.

I have attempted to get various departments to investigate him further but to no avail.

There is a con man loose in society which I have provided the evidence beyond any reasonable doubt in aprovincial court that he has taken money from me and about 20 other investors with the obvious intention of denying our investments.

I have enclosed copies of the correspondence between Armand P. LA BARGE, Chief of Police, York Region and myself and a CD of the hearing.

I would appreciate that you have a look at it with the hope that you see cause to investigate this mans

operation. An early response at your convenience would be nice.

I personally do not have the resources to do the job.

There is no doubt that there is a criminal at large. I have identified him and located him for you.

Yours respectfully

Frank Gallagher


38/251

38

From : Michael Thomson


39/251

39

From : Michael Thomson

Sent : January 18, 2006 12:51:19 PM

To :

CC : "Mona Eichmann"

Subject : BioSafe Natural Products Inc./ Bio-Safe Natural TechnologiesInc.

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

I have reviewed the documents, forwarded to our office here, that were submitted to ourNewmarket Detachment. You have proposed an investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspicesof the Canada Business Corporations Act Chapter C-44 (CBCA) and as such, this matter has beentaken by our office for review.

A review of the matter has been completed and the Department of Justice (DOJ) has beenconsulted in terms of prosecution under the jurisdiction of this Act.Unfortunately, Part XIX, and Section 229(1) CBCA and thereafter of the Act is quite specific inthe terms of the investigation and enforcement of same. This is entirely a civil procedure thatrequires the Court to issue an Investigation Order and thereafter appoint an Inspector. TheInspector has specific authorization allowing entry and examination of the corporation's booksand records. These duties are outlined in Section 130(1) CBCA. Part XIX.1 outlines theapportioning of the award of damages, and Part XX outlines remedies, offences and punishment.

Mr. Donald WILSON's assertions that a subpoena and/or a search warrant are required in order

to allow the shareholders to review the companies' books and records are erroneous, as outlinedin Section 21 (1-10) CBCA.

It is the judgment of DOJ and this office that this matter lies solely within the confines ofcivil litigational procedures, and as such, DOJ will not consider prosecuting this matter and noinvestigation will be undertaken by this office. An attempt has been made to verbally conveythis message via telephone, however the number provided appears to be the number of a faxmachine. The information provided will be kept on file for intelligence/ information purposesonly. If you have any further questions, these may be directed to the Writer atthe numbers listed below.

Yours truly,

M.J. Thomson, Sgt.

NCO i/c Central Intake & Admin. Support.Greater Toronto Area - Commercial Crime Section,Milton, Ontario(905) 876-9656(905) 876-9757 (Fax)[email protected]
http://by114fd.bay114.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&a=bed378f4aa7ae8c205cf394937ab963b649074f06d1462617bb55c2922c7425d&mailto=1&[email protected]&msg=5F984C95-C8F6-451D-BDD6-4EFCF99D5FC1&start=0&len=3420&src=&type=xhttp://by114fd.bay114.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&a=bed378f4aa7ae8c205cf394937ab963b649074f06d1462617bb55c2922c7425d&mailto=1&[email protected]&msg=5F984C95-C8F6-451D-BDD6-4EFCF99D5FC1&start=0&len=3420&src=&type=x


40/251

40

To: Michael ThomsonRoyal Canadian Mounted Police

From: Frank GallagherPolitical Abstainer

January 18, 2006

Dear Michael

I am 63, old enough to have witnessed a lot of corruption, huge waste of tax payers money, and it just goeson and on. I am not politically inclined and in fact I really have no idea how the system is supposed to work.

I have been reading a little lately on the Charter of Rights and the Constitution Act, 1982 and although thematerial clearly identifies itself as Canadian I have to wonder just which country it is that I live in, atKeswick ,Ontario. I commuted to a City of Toronto job which is about of an hour south of where I livedfor 14 years.

All the surrounding areas which I have come to know are all indicated on any map of Ontario I read, andOntario surely is a province of Canada so I believe that I am a Canadian and in fact , my birth certificatereads that I was born in Toronto ,Ontario, Canada.

I just went and checked that, yep, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

My experience with public offices, and enforcement offices are not exactly what I would expect fromoffices structured under

P art I, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God andthe rule of law:

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedomsset out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can bedemonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

Fundamental Freedoms

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscienceand religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including

freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peacefulassembly; and (d) freedom of association.

Democratic Rights

3. Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons orof a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein.


41/251

41

LegalRights

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the rightnot to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusualtreatment or punishment.

Equality Rights

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has theright to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law wi thoutdiscrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, nationalor ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as itsobject the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groupsincluding those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin,colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Enforcement

24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, havebeen infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtainsuch remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.

(2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidencewas obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedomsguaranteed by this Charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that,having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedingswould bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

Does anyone understand this? There are tons and tons of books on this stuff isnt there?

Being an honest human being I can be honest with myself and trust that myself will be honest with me.It is a relationship that has developed since first we met nearly 63 years ago and we know each other verywell and should by now.

We have had our moments, arguing right from wrong, but we got it fairly well straightened out now.

We have adopted this Proverb as our foundation to base a decision on which seems to keep us together. I amreferring to I, me and myself.

DO ONTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO ONTO YOU

Everybody knows the intent of this statement and everybody knows that they are the only words that willserve to accomplish the intent as guaranteed in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.


42/251

42

Everybody knows, that we can not have peace, fair justice and equal rights for all if we set our goalselsewhere.

It is a shame how those empowered to administer justice fairly and to insure our rights are protectedas guaranteed in the Canadian Charter of Rights and the Constitution do not comprehend themeaning and purpose of these words.

Like perchance if I was a crook and was enjoying a very lucrative life style, then I imagine that I would vote

for the status quo, wouldnt I,and perhaps look for a few other changes that would enhance this ecstasy Ihave come to know.Perhaps you are a person who just doesnt pay his proper share of taxes ,so you would accept the status quo

and perhaps look for a few changes to enhance your lifestyle.Perhaps you are a person who enjoys a good lifestyle on social services for doing nothing when you arequite capable of working, who are you gonna vote for?

Any reasonable person must surely admit that those intelligent famous people who sat to write up theCharter of Rights surely did not do so with intent to guarantee injustice, and unequal rights for that was

achieved and guaranteed before they sat.

That we could have had for nothing.

Any reasonable decent fair person would argue out what is right with them selves sparing the rest of usneedless arguments.

So, obviously, any interpretation of a law that deprives the innocent and rewards the bad guy is not alegal interpretation of the law and in fact is a misinterpretation.(See Part VII, General 52.(1) below.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprivedthereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

P art II I, Equalization and Regional Disparities

36. (1) Without altering the legislative authority of Parliament or of the provinciallegislatures, or the rights of any of them with respect to the exercise of theirlegislative authority, Parliament and the legislatures, together with the government of Canada and the provincial governments, are committed to (a) promoting equalopportunities for the well-being of Canadians; (b) furthering economic developmentto reduce disparity in opportunities; and (c) providing essential public services of reasonable quality to all Canadians.

(2) Parliament and the government of Canada are committed to the principle of making equalization payments to ensure that provincial governments have sufficientrevenues to provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonablycomparable levels of taxation.

P art VII , General

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law o f Canada , and any lawthat is inconsistent w ith the provisions of the Constitution is , to the

Black Book II (1)

Documents

Transcript of Black Book II (1)