Bkump Ed Media 20080627
-
Upload
bkump -
Category
Technology
-
view
510 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Bkump Ed Media 20080627
aposdle – New ways ...
... to work, learnand collaborate!
A Competence-based Approach for Formalizing Learning Goals in
Work-integrated Learning
Tobias Ley, Barbara Kump, Armin Ulbrich, Peter Scheir und Stefanie N. Lindstaedt
Barbara Kump
9 April 2023 / 2
Outline
A Workplace Learning Context Model Process Package
Domain Knowledge Package
Competency Package
Modelling Learning Goals for Work-Integrated Learning
Implementation of the Workplace Learning Context Approach in the APOSDLE Project
Real-World Applications and a Prototype
Conclusions and Outlook
9 April 2023 / 3
A Workplace Learning Context Model
[adapted form Lindstaedt & Farmer, 2004]
Worker Learner
Expert
9 April 2023 / 4
Domain Knowledge Package
Usually: documents are stored in structured databases
E.g. Ontology
Domain Concepts
Relation
[e.g. Green, 1999]
Domain Concepts as semantic metadata
9 April 2023 / 5
Process PackageTwofold role of the work process:
Tasks as organizational constraints
Task at hand defines personal learning need of a worker
KNOWLEDGE WORKER PROJECT MANAGEMENT TASKS
Sara (Engineer)
Estimating Project Effort
Analysing Project ResultsLearning Need
9 April 2023 / 6
Process Models
9 April 2023 / 7
Competency Package
Contains the competencies that are relevant for performing all tasks in a learning domain, and that can be acquired based on existing resources
Process Package:
defines the scope of competencies
Domain Knowledge Package:
limits the number of competencies (due to resources)
9 April 2023 / 8
Focus of the Competency Package
Human User
Task Demand (in terms of Knowledge & Skills)
Competencies: Knowledge & Skills,
Ability to perform TasksLearning Goals
(in terms of Knowledge & Skills to acquire)
Learning Opportunity[compare Schmidt, 2004; Sicilia, 2005]
Competency GapAnalysis
9 April 2023 / 9
Modeling Learning Goals for Work-integrated Learning –the APOSDLE Approach
9 April 2023 / 10
ScenarioPaul, Requirements Engineer
Recently changed his department
Build a first cut
Context Model Carry out an initial
stakeholder analysis
User ProfileTasks: Build a first cut Context ModelCary out an initial stakeholder analysis
Knowledge & Skills: Knowledge of different types of system stakeholders Understand the Syntax and Semantics of Context ModelsAbility to create a Context ModelKnowledge of diffent types of stakeholder analyses
Allocate functions between actors
according to boundaries
Competency Gap Analysis
Learning Opportunity
Knowledge & Skills: Knowledge about actors, tasks, goals and resources
Knowledge about different types of dependencies between actors
9 April 2023 / 11
Interlinking packages of the Workplace Learning Context Model
Task-Competency Assignment Annotation of Resources
Task History Knowledge & Skills
9 April 2023 / 12
Implementation of the Workplace Learning Context Approach in the APOSDLE project
[APOSDLE meta-model, Extract]
Task Demand
9 April 2023 / 13
Formal Specification of the Task Demand in APOSDLE
Competence based Knowledge Space Theory Korossy, 1997; Düntsch & Gediga, 1994; based on Doignon & Falmagne, 1985,
1999
Knowledge Space Theory has been applied and tested in various fields:
ALEKS (ALEKS Corp, 2003), RATH (Hockemeyer & Albert, 1999)
Workflow Processes (Stefanutti & Albert, 2002 ), Knowledge Management (Ley, 2006; Ley & Albert, 2003)
Implications for teacher education and training (Albert, 2006), Skills of Medical Trainees (Albert et al., 2007)
9 April 2023 / 14
Real World Applications of the APOSDLE Workplace Learning Context Approach
9 April 2023 / 15
Four Application Partner specific APOSDLEs
Network of SMEs
eConsulting for Innovation-management
Large Corporation
SW Simulation
Public Org. & SME
REACH Consulting & Event-Management
RESCUE
9 April 2023 / 16
Integrated modelling methodology
Domain Knowledge Package Process PackageCompetency Package
Informal Domain Model(Semantic Media Wiki)
Informal Task Model(Semantic Media Wiki)
Formal Domain Model(owl)
Formal Task Model(owl)
Semi-Formal Task Model
(YAWL)
Task Learning Goal Structure
(TACT => owl)
automatically
manually
automatically
Informal Task Demand(Semantic Media Wiki)
automatically
9 April 2023 / 17
Informal Models – EADS Example
Informal Simulation Domain Model
Informal Simulation Tasks Model
Define Objectives
Design
Develop
Execute
9 April 2023 / 18
EADS Domain Concept (Example)
9 April 2023 / 19
EADS Task (Example)
Informal Task Demand(in terms of domain concepts)
9 April 2023 / 20
Modelling the Task Demand: TACT tool
[TACT for modelling Requirements Engineering]
9 April 2023 / 21
and a Prototype…
9 April 2023 / 22
1
2
9 April 2023 / 23
Tasks(Process Package)
Learning Goals(Competency Package)
9 April 2023 / 24
Resource Viewer
Domain Concepts(Domain Knowledge Package)
9 April 2023 / 25
Conclusions & Outlook
9 April 2023 / 26
Conclusions & Outlook
We have presented a Workplace Learning Context Model Concrete implementation in 4 different application domains
Allows for competency gap analysis (based on task history)
Focus of further research: Additional indicatiors for skills and knowledge
Differences in the application domains, due to certain characteristics of the domains Relatedness of process package and domain knowledge package
Granularity of the task model and the domain model
9 April 2023 / 27
Conclusions & Outlook
The modelling methodology was useful, but needs further revision at certain stages, e.g.
It should allow for moving back and forth from informal to formal
Formative evaluation and model revision at different modelling stages is indispensable => tools for evaluation support
Combining the APOSDLE implementation of the Workplace Learning Context Model with existing Competency Management approaches
Bi-directional (APOSDLE and existing Competency Management Approaches)
Suggestions have been made, e.g. in Ley, 2007
9 April 2023 / 28
Thank you for your attention!
Barbara Kump
Graz University of Technology
Knowledge Management Institute
9 April 2023 / 29
References
Albert, D., Hockemeyer, C., Mayer, B., Steiner, C. M (2007). Cognitive Structure Modelling of Skills for Technology-Enhanced Learning. Paper presented at the 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007) , July 18-20, 2007, Niigata, Japan.
ALEKS Corp. (2003), ALEKS - A Better State of Knowledge, retrieved from http://www.aleks.com.
Doignon, J. and Falmagne, J. (1999), Knowledge Spaces, Springer, Heidelberg.
Falmagne, J., Doignon, J., Koppen, M., Villano, M. and Johannesen, L. (1990), "Introduction to Knowledge Spaces: How to Build, Test, and Search Them", Psychological Review, Vol. 97 No. 2, pp. 201-224.
Green, P.C. (1999), Building Robust Competencies: Linking Human Resource Systems to Organizational Strategies, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Hockemeyer, C., Held, T. and Albert, D. (1998), "RATH - A Relational Adaptive Tutoring Hypertext WWW-Environment Based on Knowledge Space Theory", in Alvegard, C. (Ed.), CALISCE`98: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computer Aided Learning in Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, pp. 417-423.
Korossy, K. (1997), "Extending the theory of knowledge spaces: A competence-performance approach", Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Vol. 205, pp. 53-82.
Ley, T., Albert, D. and Lindstaedt, S.N. (2007), "Competency Management using the Competence Performance Approach: Modeling, Assessment, Validation and Use", in Sicilia, M. A. (Ed.), Competencies in Organizational E-Learning: Concepts and Tools, Information Science Publishing, Hershey, pp. 83-119.
Ley, T., Lindstaedt, S.N. and Albert, D. (2005), "Supporting Competency Development in Informal Workplace Learning", in Althoff, K., Dengel, A., Bergmann, R., Nick, M. and Roth-Berghofer, T. (Eds.), Professional Knowledge Management, Springer, Berlin, pp. 189-202.
Lindstaedt, S.N. and Farmer, J. (2004), "Kooperatives Lernen in Organisationen", in Haake, J., Schwabe, G. and Wessner, M. (Eds.), CSCL-Kompendium - Lehr- und Handbuch zum computerunterstützten kooperativen Lernen, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, Munich, Germany, pp. 191-220.
Schmidt, A. (2004), "Context-Steered Learning: The Learning in Process Approach", Proceeding of the IEEE Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 04) Joensuu, Finnland.
Sicilia, M. (2005), "Ontology-Based Competency Management: Infrastructures for the Knowledge-intensive Learning Organization", in Lytras, M. and Naeve, A. (Eds.), Intelligent Learning Infrastructures in Knowledge Intensive Organizations: A Semantic Web perspective, Idea Group, Hershey, pp. 302-324.
9 April 2023 / 30
Appendix: Competence-based Knowledge Space Theory
9 April 2023 / 31
Task-Learning Goal Structure: Relevant Assumptions for APOSDLE
A learning domain can be structured as a set A of tasks t A.
Each Task requires a specific set of worker knowledge and skills (task demand)
Tasks can be structured by a subset-relation based on the task demand
A
A={t1, t2, t3, t4, t5}
t1{c1}
t5{c1, c2, c3, c4}
t3{c1, c2}
t2{c3}
t4{c1, c2, c3}
9 April 2023 / 32
Competence based Knowledge Space Theory – Relevant Assumptions for TEWIL
A learning domain encompasses a set K of competencies c K.
Competencies are structured according to a prerequisite relation
(c1, c2) R, R K X K
c1 R c2 => c1 is prerequisite for c2
Theory: a person who has one competency c, also has all competencies that are prerequisites for c
Example: If a person has competency c2, then she also has c1
The set of competencies that a person has available is called the „competence state“ of the person
A competence state is a subset of K that takes into account the prerequisite relationship
K
K={c1, c2, c3, c4}
c2
c4
c3c1
9 April 2023 / 33
c2
c4
c3c1
Prerequisite Relation(Competencies)
Subset Relation(Tasks)
t1{c1}
t5{c1, c2, c3, c4}
t3{c1, c2}
t2{c3}
t4{c1, c2, c3}
Task Demand:takes into account prerequisite relation on competencies
Competence State:takes into account prerequisite relation on competencies
Consequently: •Each Task Demand is a feasible Competence State
•The set union of two or more Task Demands is a feasible Competence State
•The Competence State of a user is inferred by taking set unions of the task demands of all tasks the user is able to perform (Performance Pattern)
9 April 2023 / 34
c2
c4
c3c1
{ }
{ }
{t1, t2, t3, t4}
{c1, c2, c3}
{t1, t2}
{c1, c3}
{t2}
{c3}
{t1}
{c1}
{t1, t2, t3, t4, t5}
{c1, c2, c3, c4}
{t1, t3}
{c1, c2}
Prerequisite Relation(Competencies)
Subset Relation(Tasks)
Competence State
t1{c1}
t5{c1, c2, c3, c4}
t3{c1, c2}
t2{c3}
t4{c1, c2, c3}
Task-Competency Structure
Performance State(theoretically assumed)
9 April 2023 / 35
The CbKST and the Learning Need… In terms of Competence-based Knowledge Space Theory in
my approach to technology-enhanced work-integrated leraning,
the Learning Need is the Discrepancy of
Task Demand (of a Task) and Competence State (of a User)
t5{c1, c2, c3, c4}
{c1, c2}
Learning Need = {c3, c4}
Example: