BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between...

13
BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables

description

Hypothesis Two-tailed (do not predict the direction of the relationship) –Changes in Position cause changes in Stress One-tailed (predict the direction of the relationship) –Higher ranking officers have more stress

Transcript of BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between...

Page 1: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS

Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables

Page 2: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

Using the “crosstabulation” technique

• Open file Position stress gender.sav or .xls• Variables

– Position on the police force• Values: Patrol officer, Sergeant

– Stress• Values: Low, High

• What is the hypothesis? (Guess)

Page 3: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

Hypothesis

• Two-tailed (do not predict the direction of the relationship)– Changes in Position cause changes in Stress

• One-tailed (predict the direction of the relationship)– Higher ranking officers have more stress

Page 4: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

Using cross-tabulation (“crosstabs”)

• Analyze|Descriptive statistics|Crosstabs• Place independent variable in columns• Place dependent variable in rows• Select “Cells” & check “column

percentages”• Optional: For the dependent variable, to

have the “L” row appear above the “H” row, select “Format” & check “descending”

Page 5: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

Job Stress

Position on police force

Low

High

Total

Sergeant

86

30

116

Patrol Officer

24

60 84

Total 110 90 N= 200

Job Stress

Position on police force

Low

High

Sergeant

78% 33%

Patrol Officer

22% 67%

Total 100% 100%

Two-tailed hypothesis: as the level of the independent variable changes (from Patrol Officer to Sergeant), does the distribution of the dependent variable change?

One-tailed hypothesis: Is this change in the hypothesized direction?

Page 6: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

Introducing a “control” variable

• Could the apparent effect of position on stress actually be caused by another independent variable?

• Perhaps it’s “Gender” (M/F)– To challenge the opinion that Position affects Stress,

must choose a variable that is probably related to Position

– Gender is probably related to Position• In SPSS, add “Gender” to “Layer”

Page 7: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

Job Stress

Position on police force

Low

High

Sergeant

70% 53%

Patrol Officer

30% 47%

Total 100% 100%

Job Stress

Position on police force

Low

High

Sergeant

83% 23%

Patrol Officer

17% 77%

Total 100% 100%

Females

Males

“First-order” Partial Tables

Does the original, “zero-order” relationship between variables still hold true for the Male value of the control variable? For the Female value?

Page 8: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

Job Stress

Position on police force: Males

Low

High

Sergeant

83% 23%

Patrol Officer

17% 77%

Total 100% 100%

Job Stress

Position on police force: Females

Low

High

Sergeant

70% 53%

Patrol Officer

30% 47%

Total 100% 100%

Page 9: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

Ethnicity

Support for police

Black

White

Total

Supportive

5

20

25

Neutral

15

5

20

Unsupportive

10

5

15

Total

30

30

N = 60

Ethnicity

Support for police

Black

White

Total

Supportive

Neutral

Unsupportive

Total

Insert percentages…

Ethnicity support for police

Page 10: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

Ethnicity

Support for police

Black

White

Total

Supportive

5

20

25

Neutral

15

5

20

Unsupportive

10

5

15

Total

30

30

N = 60

Ethnicity

Support for police

Black

White

Total

Supportive

17%

66%

Neutral

50%

17%

Unsupportive

33%

17%

Total

100%

100%

Ethnicity support for police

Page 11: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

Support for police

Black

White

Supportive

5

9

Neutral

10

3

Unsupportive

3

3

Total

18

15

Support for police

Black

White

Supportive

0

11

Neutral

5

2

Unsupportive

7

2

Total

12

15

Has Reported a Crime Never Reported a Crime

First-order partial tables

Control variable: prior report as a crime victim

Insert percentages…

Page 12: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

Support for police

Black

White

Supportive

27%

60%

Neutral

56%

20%

Unsupportive

17%

20%

Total

100%

100%

Support for police

Black

White

Supportive

0%

74%

Neutral

42%

13%

Unsupportive

58%

13%

Total

100%

100%

Has Reported a Crime Never Reported a Crime

First-order partial tables

Control variable: prior report as a crime victim

Page 13: BIVARIATE/MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Displaying and analyzing the relationship between categorical variables.

First-order partial tables Reported a crime Never Reported a Crime

Zero-order table

Control variable: prior report as a crime victim

Hypothesis: Ethnicity determines support for police