Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

38
Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area Pat Saffel FWP Fish Manager Missoula

description

Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area. Pat Saffel FWP Fish Manager Missoula. This Presentation sort of a “welcoming”. Diverse examples of projects around Missoula B iological considerations Assessments One fish screen project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Page 1: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Pat SaffelFWP Fish Manager

Missoula

Page 2: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

This Presentationsort of a “welcoming”

• Diverse examples of projects around Missoula– Biological considerations– Assessments

• One fish screen project– Complex up and downstream passage

• Three upstream fish passage projects– Hydro dam, low-head dam & diversion

• Wrap up with general themes, sneak in a video?

Page 3: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

This Presentationsort of a “welcoming”

• Diverse examples of projects around Missoula– Biological considerations– Assessments

• One fish screen project– Complex up and downstream passage

• Three upstream fish passage projects– Hydro dam, low-head dam & diversion

• Wrap up with general themes, sneak in a video?

Page 4: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

This Presentationsort of a “welcoming”

• Diverse examples of projects around Missoula– Biological considerations– Assessments

• One fish screen project– Complex up and downstream passage

• Three upstream fish passage projects– Hydro dam, low-head dam & diversion

• Wrap up with general themes, sneak in a video?

Page 5: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Questions with Fish Screens

• Is a fish in the stream better than one in the ditch?– Usually, but how much better?– Worth the cost?

Page 6: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

EF Rock Creek Fish Screen

Irrigation season: May – SepOutflow: seepage - 200+ cfs

200 cfs capacity$700,000

Atrophied channel5 cfs summer flow

Page 7: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area
Page 8: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological Considerations

• Reservoir population

• Canal salvage history

• EF Rock Cr. fish populations & habitat

• Return spawners

Page 9: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological Considerations

• Reservoir population

• Canal salvage history

• EF Rock Cr. fish populations & habitat

• Return spawners

Page 10: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological Considerations

• Reservoir population

• Canal salvage history

• EF Rock Cr. fish populations & habitat

• Return spawners

Page 11: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological Considerations

• Reservoir population

• Canal salvage history

• EF Rock Cr. fish populations & habitat

• Return spawners

Page 12: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Monitoring at EF Rock Creek

• Hopefully answer how much better a fish in the creek is than one in the ditch – after the fact…

• Trap & mark fish that are screened– How many fish are put back into the creek?

• Trap returning adults– How many fish screened return as adults?– Move above dam?

Page 13: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Monitoring at EF Rock Creek

• Hopefully answer how much better a fish in the creek is than one in the ditch – after the fact…

• Trap & mark fish that are screened– How many fish are put back into the creek?

• Trap returning adults– How many fish screened return as adults?– Move above dam?

Page 14: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

TrapsUpstreamDownstream

Page 15: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area
Page 16: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area
Page 17: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Questions with Upstream Passage

• How many fish are being impeded?

• Where do they want to go?– Are you passing fish to the correct location\population?– Will they survive?

• What kind of passage?– Volitional or selective– Passage structures

Page 18: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Questions with Upstream Passage

• How many fish are being impeded?

• Where do they want to go?– Are you passing fish to the correct location\population?– Will they survive?

• What kind of passage?– Volitional or selective– Passage structures

Page 19: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Questions with Upstream Passage

• How many fish are being impeded?

• Where do they want to go?– Are you passing fish to the correct location\population?– Will they survive?

• What kind of passage?– Volitional or selective– Passage structures

Page 20: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Milltown Dam

Page 21: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

About 200,000 fish of 12 spp. blocked each year

Page 22: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area
Page 23: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Radial GateBlackfoot R.

Clark Fork R.

Page 24: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Two Ladders?

Page 25: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Silver Lake

Silver Lake System

Page 26: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

DeHaan et al. 2009

Page 27: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

DeHaan et al. 2009

Page 28: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

DeHaan et al. 2009

Page 29: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological Considerations

• Both creeks could be contributing bull trout to Silver Lake, with adults wanting to return

• What is the origin of bull trout in Silver Lake?– Prioritize passage efforts between the two creeks

Page 30: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

DeHaan et al. 2009

Page 31: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Silver Lake/Storm Lake Creek Bull Trout Passage Project

• In 2012: Tagged/ moved 8 adults (and 13 sub-adults)• At least 7 adults moved upstream• Large redds found

• Manual passage for now - hybridization concerns with rainbow

Page 32: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

• West Fork Clearwater• Had ~ 30 redds

• Emily-A Dam• Migration route blocked

Lake Inez Fish Barrier (aka, Emily-A Dam)

Emily-A Dam

Page 33: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

• Many radio-tagged fish went to WF Clearwater

Lake Inez Fish Barrier (aka, Emily-A Dam)

Emily-A Dam

Page 34: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area
Page 35: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Bull trout caught at dam, not in trap

Page 36: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Restoring Migration

VIDEO

Page 37: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

General Themes• Many factors reduce numbers of fish (e.g., EF Rock Creek),

understanding the biology improves a project’s chance of success (e.g., Silver Lake)

• The fewer life-stages and habitat problems involved the more likely to succeed (e.g., upstream passage of adults vs. downstream passage of juveniles).

• Passage to suitable biological and physical habitat can be very successful (e.g., Emily-A Dam).

• More information is needed to understand what affects a project’s effectiveness (e.g., fish screen projects).

Page 38: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area