1

Synthetic Biology New technology creating new life (p. 6)

BioHazard

Nuclear ScienceRevolutionizing the way we think about energy (p. 13)

The Giant SquidThe truth about the deep sea’s

mysterious monster (p. 21)

Volcanoes and Ice CreamAmazing experiments that you

don’t need a lab to do (p. 17)

Issue 9001

2

Table of Contents

5

14

23

Letter from the Editor What we’re all about and our inspiration for the magazine

Contributor’s Page All about the writers of this magazine

Synthetic Biology An up and coming field that could revolutionize the way we look at life

Human Evolution How we became the species we are today

Nuclear ScienceHow we manipulate the building blocks of the universe

Home Experiment Our science brought to your home

Fish of the WorldThe way fish around the world have adapted to their environments

The Giant SquidAn amazing and mysterious creature that we are just beginning to understand

3

4

5

10

14

19

21

23

Picture courtesy of: BBC News

Picture courtesy of: Oregon State University

Picture courtesy of: GloFish.com

Cover photo courtesy of: GloFish.com

3

A Letter From BioHazard

We have had a hard time bringing you this month’s Biohazard magazine, and we take pride in our work and hope you enjoyed your read. Biohazard’s mission statement is to educate the ordinary of the science of the extraordinary, and this month’s magazine certainly has been educating, with prevalent topics that were unbeknowst to the public not long ago.

We thought of the idea when we realized the way science is being taught in schools is quite boring. We set out to make all these science topics actually interesting so students can better understand these topics and become fascinated with them. We hope you, the reader, have yourself have become fascinated and will read more of our magazine.

Picture courtesy of: Elizah Flores

4

[Contributor’s Page]Michael BarreMichael Barre was born in Louisiana and moved to Austin at an early age. He went to Patton Elementary School and Kealing Middle School and is now a freshman as LASA. He has always had an interest in science and the more technical aspect of the world. He currently spends a lot of time programming, but has a general interest in all fields of science and computer-related topic. He also played soccer through elementary school and has picked it back up in high school.

Nick BlacklockNick Blacklock, born in Austin, Texas, is fascinated by ma-rine biology. He also has an unnatural obsession with fishing, which he is quite good at. Besides marine biology, he enjoys science in general as well as math. He goes in fishing trips almost every weekend. His likes alternative music by gener-ally lesser-known artists, and is almost always listening to some form of alternative music.

Caleb ElligntonCaleb Ellington, an aspiring bioengineer, was born in Indiana. He is the head of the Synthetic Biology Club at LASA. In the summers, he works at a Univeristy of Texas Lab for cichlids (a type of fish) and animal behavior studies. He’s been playing guitar for five years and trombone for four, and is currently learning piano. He has played ultimate frisbee since middle school, and can ride a unicycle.

Pictures courtesy of: Michael Barre

5

If you can imagine it

you can make it

3D PrintersNow, only at

Picture courtesy of: BJet

6

Playing GodBy Caleb Ellington

How genetic engineering and synthetic biology are changing the world

The flourecent fish are above called GloFish, created through the implementation of genes for certain floure-cent proteins along with muscle promoters, turning the fish’s muscles different colors. Scientists hope to have these fish detect pollution in water in the future by turning the flourecence on and off.

turing long pieces of DNA, genetic cir-cuitry, de-extincting organisms, and better ways to produce drugs and biochemicals through bacteria and yeast. Today though, synthetic biology is already making tech-nological leaps and bounds in the Mar-cotte lab. In a recent project, Marcotte has been able to predict and prove the effects of genetic diseases that have, officially, never happened. It may seem like a something a psychic would do, but thanks to synthetic biology, the results are completely real.

“It's getting fairly straightforward to tell which of someone's genes have changes that might make them mal-function,” He said, “Combine knowl-edge like that with the growing cata-log and you start to be able to diagnose which particular genetic changes might cause a given person's genetic disease.” Marcotte was able to synthesize proteins from genes he had manipulated in order to create a scenario for a genetic disease. After synthesis of the new protein, he observed

Picture courtesy of : GloFish.com

A couple years ago the idea of real X-men was just a comic book fiction. To achieve the goal of a superhuman, we would have had to modify the building blocks of how our bodies work, meaning that a change in our protein structures was necessary, a massive feat for today’s engineering and biology. However, we may only be a couple years away from creating mod-ern x-man equivalents thanks to a young and useful field called synthetic biology.

Synthetic biology is the design and con-struction of biological devices and sys-tems for useful purposes. Thanks to this newly emerging field, protein structure changes may be possible, along with many other amazing things. Synthetic Biology does not only have future appli-cations though. Today scientists like Dr. Sara Sawyer of the UT Virology lab and Dr. Edward Marcotte of the UT Biochem-istry lab are using these new practices to create HIV/AIDS resistant T-Cells and predict genetic diseases that have never occurred before, respectively. This and many other projects that could affect and help our entire world are being under-taken by this new and revolutionary field.

Dr. Marcotte, a UT professor of bio-chemistry, is a prominent scientist to-day. He is renowned for his recent studies in genetic diseases and protein interaction within cells, as wells as his lead in the charge of synthetic biology.

“[Synthetic biology] is a field in its infancy.. relatively few major in-dustries or processes have been built around it yet.” Marcotte said. This means that synthetic biology is a less-er known field right now; However, Mar-cotte states that in the near future, possible applications would be custom manufac-

7

networks down, creating a feasible anticancer drug by stopping mitosis, as well as other medical medical aid. Albeit synthet-ic biology being a new field, it has already begun to help in major proj-ects like this one, that tackle humanity’s problems today.

One of our main problems has been the nasty little ret-rovirus HIV. It has become a pandem-ic, spread every-where across the globe and since it mutates nearly as rapidly as the in-fluenza virus, the one that changes

too fast we need to get a vaccination ev-ery year, no cure can be found. Not even

-Edward Marcotte

“these are systems so complex that they make the most sophisticated

man-made device seem relatively trivial.”

Mask In Vivo In Silico

Playing with Pigment

A.) When there is no light, bacteria produce pigment

IN AN EXPERIMENT CONDUCTED by the Ellington lab of Biochemsitry at UT, E-coli bacteria were given light sensors and modified in other ways. The properties of their modifica-tions ranged from generating pigment when the light sensor detected no light, to creating a communication molecule (quorum) to interact with other molecules in order to create complex pictures.

B.) Bacteria produce quorum molecules when not in light, when other bacteria pick up the quorum, the produce pigment

C.) When there is light, bacteria pro-duce pigment

D.) Pigment is turned on only when bacteria in the light come in contact with quorum, only produced by bacteria in the dark, creating the border

Picture courtesy of : Ellington Lab

whether the mutated protein would have functions and properties different from the old one or whether it would just be a useless hunk of amino acids with no func-tion. From this, and the way the normal protein would behave within the body, the impacts of the mutated protein’s func-tion on the organism could be predicted and so a genetic disease could be identi-fied, without anyone ever contracting it. In his current project, Marcotte is using synthetic biology to create a map of our cells. However, he is not creating just any map; Marcotte is creating new proteins and using ones found within our cells to map out the intricate inner workings of our cells. “Proteins are the roads, the scaffolding, the supports, the factories, the motors, and the machines of the cells. We still don't know what half of them are doing in any detail, so we hope that by mapping out their relationships, especially which proteins physically connect to which other ones, we'll get a sort of Google map for the cell, a birds eye view of what and where the different proteins are. ... This map is just the starting point for lots of future research to figure out what the proteins are doing,” Marcotte said. A map of the ways cells carry out their jobs and interact outside and within themselves would serve a great benefit to many different fields. Being able to know how protein networks interact would al-low us to see cells in a much different way than the current organelle based view we have today. Marcotte’s research would al-low us to see cells for what they really are. Another product of this project is pos-sible medical treatment to shut protein

Axotl Salamanders made to glow by the introduction of Green Flourecent Protein (GFP) genes and muscle promoters into their genome. This process has beeen applied to many other organisms including pigs, cats, mice, and fish (such as the GloFish seen earlier)

Picture courtesy of : Wikipedia Commons

8

our own bodies and their immune systems can find a way to triumph this virus since HIV preys on T-cells, the very cells de-signed to kill intruders. However, human-ity’s reckoning day with the virus may not come thanks the creation of HIV resistant T-cells. Doctor Sara Sawyer of the UT vi-rology lab has created these revolutionary cells through advances in the way we think about genetics because of synthetic biology. “The type of synthetic biology that I do is to engineer human cells to encode immune system compo-nents from other species. We have learned a lot about the in-terplay of viruses and immunity by doing this,” Sawyer said. The role of other species in the process of outsmarting a virus is very important. Because a virus evolves to trick a particular species into being a host, it cannot jump to another species im-mediately. This is why we don’t get mistletoe and other tree dis-eases just from walking by or touching them; Those diseases are specifically evolved to affect trees.So, if we could get our cells to be taken by the virus as, say, a tree or another species, rather than our own, that would render us immune to that virus. But in or-der to be taken as something different by viruses, we would have to take their DNA, and that is where synthetic biology comes

in, creating a new type of cell from the combination of the immune system of a different organism’s and our own, for the purpose of becoming unaffected by the virus. It is not a perfect treatment though. “The idea would be to give these cells to people that already have HIV in or-der to keep them from getting AIDS and dying,” Sawyer said “It's sort of a desperate, expensive, and extreme measure, but that is the reality of

where we are with AIDS. ... The more densely humans live on the planet (increasing all the time), the more dis-ease will be a problem and the more new diseases will arise.” It is a harsh reality that, although this is an inefficient and desperate cure, it is still one of the only ones there is, and if it proves to work, that is all that matters at this point. Still, it is a cure, and we have synthetic biology and its advances in virology and genetics to thank for that. Synthetic biology goes hand in hand with genetics, which is why it has been able to manipulate virology and biology to create the amazing aforementioned results. Its ability to cooperate with and manipulate genetics so easily is why synthetic biology is cata-

A diagram of the DNA/RNA interface that is the basis for most biology. By changing a nucleotide (A,T,C,G) in the DNA, it subsequent-ly affects thhe proteins made by the RNA, and thus the organism is altered.

“Countries that invest more will hire better scientists and do better science, and then get to reap the commercial re-

wards of that.” -Scott Hunicke-Smith

Picture courtesy of : Wikipedia Commons

9

pulting to the forefront of science right now. Our DNA is the chief of command, the defining factor for who we are, and the new ability to manipulate an organ-ism by changing a couple of nucleotides has proved to be an amazing and incred-ibly useful one. Doctor Scott Hunicke-Smith, head of the UT genetics sequenc-ing department, has had a long history with genetics. Through the years he has witnessed the change in the way we see our DNA from a unchangeable, defining string of nucleotides, to the manipulat-able, program type of view we have today. “I picked up a part-time job in the bio-chemistry department because they needed new engineering solutions so we could sequence the first human ge-nome as fast and as cheaply as possible. That field was great - many more unan-swered questions than answered ones and people just starting to learn how to ‘build’ - like DNA cloning, genetic engi-neering, etc. So I jumped in,” Smith said.

Since he jumped in, many of those un-answered questions have been answered through new technology, and most re-cently, the question of whether we will ever have the power to create organisms by design, a god like feat, has been an-swered with a yes. Smith was a mechani-cal engineering major before he discov-ered the field of genetics. Because of his previous knowledge of engineering and his newfound passion for biology, he was able to accomplish projects that other ge-neticists and biologists would not dare to attempt. Recently he created a machine in which, a piece of DNA could be split evenly and predictably, a process that was somewhat left to chance with other ma-chines, and at the molecular level, preci-sion and predictability are a necessity. These new defined strings of DNA are easier to use than the strings created by previous methods, and that means that the use of synthetic biology in genetics, the lifeblood of biology, is only growing. Synthetic biology has proved itself through various feats in science such as the cellu-lar maps of protein highways, foresight in deadly mutations, HIV resistant T-cells, and its use in genetic engineering. The field can only grow and expand to become a defining factor in our future, perhaps to produce fuel for our cars as oil reserves run dry, facilitate organ synthesis, de-ex-tinct organisms that have been long gone, or even create our real life x-men equiva-lents through the modification of our ge-nome. These examples may appear a little

Bacteria modified with genetic circuitry to produce pigment when in light have had useful applications in the discovery of Bioengineering. A sort of meta-art is displayed above, with E-coli taking a picture of itself on a petri dish

An image of Dr. Ellington, head of the UT Biochem-istry lab, created by the bacteria mentioned above

Picture courtesy of : Ellington Lab

Picture courtesy of : Ellington Lab

far fetched, but with the help of synthetic biology and its amazing potential, every day that passes make these ideas look less like something that came out of a sci-ence-fiction novel and more like a reality.

10

OH, THE HUMANITYWE WERE NOT ALWAYS HUMAN. Our journey to the sophisticated creatures we are today has been an onerous and fascinating one. Once unevolved monkeys, we have made our way past vicious pretators, natural disasters, and even other subspecies of ourselves to make it into the modern world. This diagram demonstrates the millions of years of natural selection, speciation, trials, and troubles that have brought modern man to his vast hold on the Earth today.

1.) A r d i p i t h e c u s r a m i d u sDate of Origin: 4.5 million years agoKey Characteristics: lanky and hairy, 20 per-cent sapien brain size. Straighter spine.Significance: The link between humans and monkeys. Where Discovered: North Rift Valley

2.) K e nya nt h ro p u s p l at yo p sDate of Origin: 3.5 million years agoKey Characteristics: flat face, smaller jawSignificance: Natural selection starts to have a large effect, speciationWhere Discovered: Southern Ethiopia, Rift Valley

3.) H o m o r u d o l f e n s i sDate of Origin: two million years agoKey Characteristics: larger cranial capacity than platyops, less protruding faceSignificance: From a different lineage, yet similar enough to humans to be genus HomoWhere Discovered: Northern Kenya

4.) Australopithecus anamensisDate of Origin: four million years agoKey Characteristics: Related closely to Ardipi-thecus, climbed treesSignificance: Link between Africanus species and HomoWhere Discovered: Kenya, Ethiopia

6.) Australopithecus africanusDate of Origin: three million years agoKey Characteristics: slender build, larger cra-nium, human like posture, large teethSignificance: First of our bipedal ancestorsWhere Discovered: All Africa, four fossils

7.) Australopithecus robustusDate of Origin: two million years agoKey Characteristics: heavy chewing complex, large jaw crestsSignificance: adapted to be savage (more gor-rilla like)for dry environmentWhere Discovered: South Africa

5.) A u s t r a l o p i t h e c u s b o i s e iDate of Origin: 2.3 million years agoKey Characteristics: Massive Jaw, small cra-nium, much like modern day gorillasSignificance: Massive teeth and smaller brain for harsh environmentWhere Discovered: Eastern Africa

8.) H o m o h a b i l i sDate of Origin: 2.3 million years agoKey Characteristics: Long arms, short, smaller jaw, half the cranial capacity of humansSignificance: close enough to be within the “Homo” familyWhere Discovered: Kenya

9.) H o m o e r g a s t e rDate of Origin: 1.8 million years agoKey Characteristics: Thinner skull bones, less protrusive face, larger cranial capacitySignificance: cranial capacity starts to increase drastically, first use of tools among hominidsWhere Discovered: Rift Valley

10.) H o m o e r e c t u s Date of Origin:1.5 million years agoKey Characteristics: physically similar to H. ergaster, much more technological advancesSignificance: first hominid to venture beyond Africa and colonize other parts of the world Confirmed use of controlled fire.Where Discovered: Pliocene epoch

11.) H o m o h e i d e l b e r g e n s i sDate of Origin: 600,000 years agoKey Characteristics: Use more evolved tools than those of Homo Erectus, more spread throughout the worldSignificance: last branch between H. neander-thalis and sapiensWhere Discovered: South Africa

12.) H o m o n e a n d e r t h a l i sDate of Origin: 400,000 years agoKey Characteristics: flatter skull than modern humans, use of more advanced tools.Significance: evolved at the same time as Hu-mans, humans most likely out-competed this species, causing it to go extinct.Where Discovered: Neander Valley

13.) H o m o s a p i e n sDate of Origin: 400,000 years agoKey Characteristics: Domed cranium, smaller feet and hands, shorter legs and arms, ad-vanced toolsSignificance: The final stop . Humans devel-oped civilization. Much larger cranium and smaller jaw than all previous species

By Caleb EllingtonAridpithecus ramidus, the link between us and apesPicture courtesy of www.humanbeings.50web.com

11

CHANGE BY THE AGEMillions of years ago

www.boneclones.com

0

1

2

3

4

5

1.)

2.)

3.)

4.)

6.)

7.)

5.) 8.)

9.)

10.)

11.)

12.) 13.)

Pictures courtesy of:

12

AFTER THE BOMBING of Hiroshi-ma and Nagasaki in 1945 and throughout the Cold War, the word nuclear evoked images of explosions and mass destruc-tion. Now, however, the word nuclear means much more than a bomb. Nuclear science has created a promising source of renewable energy in the future, and given us a much better understanding of the universe.

Dr. Sheldon Landsberger, a nuclear and radiation engineer at the University of Texas, believes the benefits in using nucle-ar power outweigh the potential danger of a nuclear meltdown.

“The emission of greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels is much more serious to the environment and people,” he said.

Nuclear reactors are a great source of en-ergy, but many people are scared of them because they don’t understand how they work and they think they are in danger. A proper understanding of how nuclear reactors work and how they differ from nuclear bombs, both as a potential re-source and safety precautions, can make people feel safer about energy produced

in a nuclear plant. Knowledge of the ben-efits of a nuclear power plant as opposed to other forms of energy generation will make people see the potential of nuclear science.

Dr. Mark Deinert, a professor at the Uni-versity of Texas, said nuclear reactions produce millions of times more energy than fossil fuels.

“Renewable energy technologies share the problem that they are much more expen-sive than fossil fuels, and this is also the case for nuclear energy,” he said.

While this means that nuclear power is a viable form of energy, there are some problems with the use of nuclear plants.

There are two different types of nuclear reactions, fission and fusion. According to PopSci, a website with information on popular scientific topics, in a fission reac-tion, a subatomic particle is fired at the nucleus of an atom. This splits the atom and releases energy. For the process to work best, the subatomic particle must be a “free neutron”, which is a neutron not bound to an atom. The atom in the re-

action must be a heavy isotope, normally some variation of uranium or plutonium. Once the atom splits, the new pieces col-lide with more atoms, creating more splits, and causing a massive chain reac-tion. This entire process produces tons of electromagnetic radiation and kinetic en-ergy, which mainly manifests as heat.

While this produces massive amounts of energy, fusion reactions produce more energy than fission reactions, but that’s not the only thing taken into account when deciding an energy source. Dein-ert thinks if fusion was economically and technologically feasible, then it would be the better choice.

“Their operation is safe, the by-products are not a concern, the fuel is plentiful, and per kilo-gram of fuel, fusion produces about four times the energy of nuclear fission. However, fusion reactors have been in develop-ment for 60 years and there are significant technical obstacles that need to be overcome before fusion is commercially feasible.”

Gone Fission

By Michael Barre

Cooling towers of a nuclear power plant in IllinoisPicture courtesy of: Michael Kappel

13

Research from the Culham Centre for Fu-sion Energy shows, in the process of fu-sion, two light weight particles are heated to extremely high temperatures (about 100 million degrees celsius) and fired at each other. The particles used are gen-erally atoms of deuterium and tritium, because both of those atoms are types of hydrogen, which is the lightest element in the universe. To prevent the particles from cooling, they are trapped in a mag-netic confinement system.

When the deuterium and tritium collide, they fuse into hydrogen and neutrons traveling at high speeds. The energy from the neutrons is converted into electricity. Unfortunately, the technology for such a reaction is out of our reach because there is not yet a way to feasibly maintain the conditions that would be required for such a reaction to take place.

According to the website for the company Duke Energy, there are several common misconceptions about nuclear forms of energy, and because of these many people have fears that actually have no scientific backing.

The first common myth about nuclear en-ergy is that the fuel is a radioactive green goop that could leak out of the reactor. The fuel is actually small pellets stacked into rods, and willl stay in this form in-definitely. These pellets will never leak out of the reactor as a dangerous slime. This myth leads straight into the next one though, because of the idea of radiation.

Many people also believe that living close to a nuclear reactor poses a danger

to them because of radiation risk. What these people don’t realize is that everyone on earth is exposed to radiation every sec-ond of the day from normal environmen-tal factors. Nuclear reactors do produce tons of radiation, but Dr. Steven Biegalski, another professor at UT, says this isn’t a reason to worry.

“The radiation risk is very small. The re-actor core itself is very radioactive, but it is also well contained,” he said.

Radiation is normally measured in milli-rems, or mrems, and a normal person living in a brick house receives about 10 mrems of radiation a year. A person liv-ing close to a nuclear reactor may receive about 1 more mrem per year, and this practically has no negative effect.

So there isn’t a leaking radioactive green goop leaking anywhere, and there’s no danger of radiation from being close to a plant, but neither of those address prob-ably the biggest and most feared miscon-ception about nuclear energy. Because the word nuclear is generally associated with the idea of a bomb, many people

think that a nuclear plant has the chance to explode like a bomb would. Biegalski finds this fear understandable but untrue.

“[There is] no real comparison to a nu-clear bomb. A reactor core will just not explode in that manner.”

Io9, a futuristic and science advancement blog, says the simple answer is the “en-richment” of the uranium used in the re-actions. Uranium that occurs in nature is mostly useless for reactions. The process of enrichment removes some of the ura-nium that cannot be used. Power plants only use uranium that is about three or four percent, uranium - 235, which is the isotope required for the reaction to take place. Nuclear weapons generally use uranium that is 80 - 95 percent enriched, which means that even if all of the safety measures of a nuclear power plant failed, which has happened before, the result would be nowhere close to the destruc-tion caused by a bomb.

The power plants don’t just rely on this to prevent disaster though, one of the most important safety measures put in use is the introduction of control rods, made of a material such as boron. The reason boron is special is because it can absorb neutrons, but it cannot undergo a nuclear reaction. This is useful in a fission reactor that’s producing too much heat because the reaction is carried on by the produc-tion of more neutrons which collide with more atoms, causing more splits, and the removal of the neutrons into a mate-rial that they will have no effect on slows down the reaction, preventing the reactor from meltdown.

The process of nuclear fusion, showing two mol-ecules fired at each other, which create a new atom and release energy.

Uranium fuel pellets used in fission power plants.

Control rods used in nuclear power plants.

Picture courtesy of: Wikipedia

Picture courtesy of: ITER and Fusion Energy

Picture courtesy of: Marco Brigandi

14

While the power plants don’t pose a real threat to the general public themselves, there’s still the matter of the final ma-jor misconception about energy coming from nuclear power. Many people be-lieve reactors produce millions of tons of radioactive waste. While the waste is radioactive, this figure is nowhere close to the actual number. Over 50 years of use, the nuclear reactors of the United States have produced only about 63 thousand metric tons of waste, and it’s all properly contained.

Dr. Andrew Osborne, an expert on the topic of nuclear science, says the biggest problem with nuclear waste is storage of it because it can remain radioactive for sev-eral million years.

“Solutions to this have been pro-posed, such as storing the waste in a secure, geologically stable underground facility, such as the canceled Yucca Mountain nucle-ar waste repository project.”

Biegalski believes the Yucca Mountain project is the proper choice for storage of the waste.

“Years of research has shown that this is a very good option. Opposition is just poli-tics,” he said.

According to Reuters, a news and general information website, Yucca Mountain was chosen as a storage site mainly because of

its location. It’s in the desert and far from any large populations, which means that the waste would potentially have little im-pact on anyone. There are currently about 100 storage sites all over the US, and the Yucca Mountain site would have been the alternative to all of these.

The opposition to the Yucca Mountain is mainly from politicians who claim that having the site in the state would reduce tourism and create potential water pollu-tion sources. They also say that shipping nuclear waste across the country would create targets for terrorists and that the site is too close to frequent fault lines.

The other option is to try to reduce the waste being produced by the reactors. Os-borne believes this is a possible solution.

“Methods of eliminating waste have al-ready been produced” he said. “It may be possible to reduce nuclear waste from a million-year problem into a five-hundred year one.”

Map of nuclear related sites in America, including power plants and waste disposals.

Diagram showing how a con-tainment chamber in the moun-tain would have been designed.

The Outside of the Yucca Mountain nuclear containment site.

Picture courtesty of:The Living Moon

Picture courtesy of: Wikipeida

Picture courtesy of: Yuccanmountain.org

15

SmithsonianA little bit of something for everyone

19 Museums and 9 Research Centers in Washington DC, Capitol Row

African American History and Culture

American Art

Air and Space

American Indian

Arts and Industries

National Zoo

Natural History

Air and Space Museum

Marine Science Museum

Pictures courtesy of: Smithsonian Institute

16

Step 3.Boil the solution down to increase the concen-tration of the sodium acetate (the mixture of vinegar and baking soda). The solution will be ready when there are little pieces of sodium acetate sticking to the side of the pot (little white specs) and a crusty film is forming on the top. Don’t mix the pieces of sodium acetate back in, instead gather them with a spoon and store them seperately because you will need them later.

Step 5.Cool the solution in the icebath if you have it. If not, then you can just put the solution in the fridge or freezer, but it will take longer to cool this way. Now add the soduim acetate pieces saved from

earlier to the solution. They should set off a chain reaction, causing the entire solution to freeze. If the solution does not freeze, it was either not cold enough or not boiled down enough.

Step 4.When the solution is ready, move it into the glass container and add a tablespoon of vinegar to the solution. Then stir the solution to make sure that any solid pieces are completely disolved because any solids can cause the solution to freeze early.

Step 2.Add one liter (4 1/4 cups) of vinegar to the pot. Do this slowly to ensure that the bubbling reaction between the baking soda and the vinegar will not spill out of the pot.

and Other Ways to Misuse Your KitchenHow to Make Hot Ice

SCIENCE IS INTERESTING IN GENERAL but everyone knows that the best science is what you can actually do at home. Unfortunately, many experiments that produce really cool effects require many safety precautions and some rather hard to get materials. These three experiments can be carried out by just about anyone and with materials that most people could find by just looking around their house or with a quick trip to the store.

Ice That Freezes At Room Temperature

Step 6.The sodium acetate has been frozen, but you’re not done with it. You can remelt the sodium acetate and then recool and refreeze the soluiton as many times as you want.

What You Will Need:• Baking soda• White vinegar• 1 pot (at least 1 1/2 liters)• 1 glass container (at least half a liter)• A measuring spoon and cup• An icebath for the container (optional)

Step 1.Put three tablespoons of baking soda into the pot.

Why it works:When vinegar and baking soda inter-act, carbonic acid is created, which is so unstable that it imme-diatly decomposes into carbon dioxide, which bubbles up, and water. A dilute solution of sodium acetate in water is left behind. Boiling increasing the con-centration of soduim acetate becuase water boils before sodium ac-etate. After boiling, the solution is cooled and undergoes a process known as supercooling, which is when a solu-tion is cooled below its freezing point, which for sodium acetate is about room tempera-ture. Introducing solid sodium acetate to the solution disrupts it and causes it to freeze.

By Michael Barre

17

Step 3.Add a tablespoon of the quick rise yeast to the bottle, and watch the “volcano” explode. The foam should last for a few minutes.

Step 1.Put half a cup of hydro-gen peroxide into the bottle.Step 2.Add some food coloring to the peroxide to color the eventual lava.

Make a VolcanoWith YeastWhat You Will Need:• 1 packet of quick rising yeast• Hydrogen peroxide• 1 8 oz. bottle• 1 measuring cup• Food coloring

Homemade Ice CreamWhat You Will Need:• 1 quart size plastic bag• 1 gallon size plastic bag• Whole milk• 2 quarts of ice (crushed if possible)• Vanilla extract• Rock salt• Sugar (optional)

Why it works: The hydrogen peroxide is made up of hydrogen and oxygen, and the introduction of yeast causes the hydrogen peroxide to decompose much faster. than it normally would The hyodrogen peroxide decomposes into water and oxygen, and the bubbles you see are oxygen bubbles.

Step 1.Put a cup to a cup and a half of whole milk into the quart bag. If you want to add sugar, add about a tablespoon of sugar to the bag. Then add a half a teaspoon of vanilla (or a little more if you’re us-ing a cup and a half of milk) to the bag and mix it all together. Seal the bag.

Step 2.Fill the gallon bag up about halfway with the ice and then add about a cup of rock salt (does not need to be precise).

Step 3.Put the bag of milk into the bag of ice and salt, making sure the bag is tightly sealed. Seal the ice bag. Start flipping the bag of ice over, trying to make sure the milk gets evenly cooled. Continue until the milk begins to solidify. Then take out the milk bag and enjoy!

Why it works: Icecream is just frozen milk with added flavor-ing, so the real science is in the rock salt. The salt causes the ice to melt by lowering the freezing point of the water through disrupt-ing the chemical bonds in the water. This allows the mixture to cool the milk faster and more evenly.

Pictures courtesy of: Michael BarreInformation From: www.wikihow.com, chemistry.about.com

Dorado/Mahi-Mahi/DolphinfishRecord weight- 95 lb 0 ozEating-chase sardines in schools out off coastspawning- Spawn every two nights

Largemouth BassRecord Weight- 25 lb 1 oz Eating- minnows, worms crawdeds, hunts in hydrilla, suspends, schools in summerSpawning-spawns at a certain temperature, in the spring,

RoosterfishRecord weight- 144 lb 0 ozEating- chase sardinas along shoresSpawning-release eggs in water column and are fertilized

Atlantic Blue MarlinRecord weight-1150 lbs 0ozEating- Chases sardines in schoolsSpawning-Swim to warm waters every year to spawn

Plenty of Fish in the Sea

Art From: www.tpwd.state.tx.us, www.foodforsport.co.za, www.redorbit.com,www.crushfish.com www.fisheries.no, eol.org www.jrusselljinishiangallery.com, spearfishingcharters.com.au, www.vectortemplates.com

By Nick Blacklock

Giant GrouperRecord weight- 395 lb 9 ozEating- Mainly eat crabs, and other crustacians and small fishesSpawning- Form large spawning groups in places and spawn through the summer

British CodRecord Weight-58 lbs 8 ozEating-Eat small fish but prefer squidSpawning- Spawn in fish hatcheries buit in Britain

Giant TrevallyRecord weight- 160 lbs 7 ozEating-Eat small fish around estuaries and crabsSpawning- Leave eggs to be fertilized in water column

Skipjack TunaRecord Weight- 76 lbsEating- hunt sardines in schoolsSpawning-Release eggs which are then fertilized in the water column

There are many observable fish from many places that we can learn from and see how they have evolved over time. Here are some of the

many fish from around the world.

Art From: www.tpwd.state.tx.us, www.foodforsport.co.za, www.redorbit.com,www.crushfish.com www.fisheries.no, eol.org www.jrusselljinishiangallery.com, spearfishingcharters.com.au, www.vectortemplates.com

20

World’s Deepest MysteriesINGER WINKELMAN THOUGHT SHE HAD MADE A MISTAKE when gathering data on the giant squid at first, but then she checked again, then checked again. The data was not go-ing to change. It was astounding. No one could have guessed that the giant squid is all one species. The kraken, sailors used to tell tales of it eating entire ships. this creature was mainly folklore, but did have a shred of truth to it. It is believed the kraken tale was theorized after sights of the giant squid

The ocean is still very much unex-plored. The Giant squid is one of the most unknown creatures in the ocean. Since it lives in such deep and murky waters, scientists have lots of trouble studying it. Most specimens of giant squids are found dead washed up onto beaches and are also cut out of sperm whales’ stomachs. Finally sci-entists have sent samples from muse-ums all over the world to Inger Win-kelmann and her team.

“Since the list of suggested giant squid species goes all the way up to

21 species, I was expecting a lot more variation than there turned out to be...The giant squid varies a lot in physi-cal form said Winkelmann. This newly found data was extremely surprising to scientists. The specimens collected were from all over the world from Europe, to Antarctica. This data was gathered from museums that had found giant squids washed up on shore and put them in jars with preserving liquids.

This preserver makes it possible for scientists to have accessible samples.

The depths of an undersea trench

by Nick BlacklockPicture courtesy of :DeviantART

21

Before all this, Dr. Edith Widder was close to the coast of Japan, trying to film this elusive beast.The Medusa, is deployed only for the second time onto the ocean floor.The Medusa whirs to life and begins recording at the depths of the ocean. It simulates a jellyfish under attack, but the giant squid doesn’t want the jellyfish. It wants what is attacking the jellyfish. The squid swims up to examine this odd contraption, and thus the first video of a giant squid in its natural habitat.

The over-all simul-taineous and in-stant re-action to this was

“A lot of wild screaming and near disbelief” says Widder. “The Medusa was based on The Eye-in-the-Sea which I developed as a new way of exploring the deep sea. Part of the inspiration came from a deep sea fish that uses red bioluminescence o be able to see without being seen. Unlike most deep sea inhabitants it can see red light. We used the same trick.” said Widder. This camera was set out to record the

giant squid in its natural habitat for the first time ever. The Medusa is a very complex machine, the first of its kind, engineered by Widder’s team or the “squid squad’

This is much different than other methods.

“Previous attempts have used noisy platforms fitted with bright white lights that I believe scare animals away. “ said Widder. “Medusa is a camera plat-

form that can be de-ployed as a lander or a drifter. As a land-er it drops to the bot-tom and r e m a i n s their re-c o r d i n g

until we send an acoustic signal that causes it to drop a weight and float to the surface where it is recover. ” said-Widder. “ It was the Medusa that recorded the first images ever recorded of a giant squid in its natural habitat – some-thing that’s been described as the Holy Grail of natural history cinema-tography. It was a wonderful valida-tion of the point that I’ve been mak-ing for a lot of years now – that we are exploring the oceans wrong and scar-

ing away the very creatures we want to discover. I hope it gets across the point that we’ve been scaring animal-away. I also hope it encourages more use of submersibles instead ROVs.”said Widder

After all this Inger Winkelmann pub-lishes her paper and astounds the world yet again. “difference in physical appearance is the main reason for suspicion of more than one species” says Jan, a cowork-er with Winkelmann. “The newly found data is interesting and intriguing” Widder said And there is always room for the fu-ture. The giant squid is shrouded in mystery. Winkelmann describes in closing

“Although the similarity of their mi-tochondrial genomes is very compel-ling evidence in favour of one global species, we should still wait and see what the nuclear sequences look like. I would not be surprised if these ani-mals had a few more tricks up their sleeves, or mantles if you will.”

Edith Widder lecturing at a TED talk

A full body shot of the giant squid

“ It was the Medusa that recorded the first images ever recorded of a giant squid in its natural habitat , something that’s been described as the Holy Grail of natural history cinematography.”

Picture courtesy of : Discovery

Picture courtesy of :DeviantART

Picture courtesy of :TED.com

22

Photo of the giant squid taken from the medusa

The Kraken Finally

RevealedFrom the notorious Kraken, the giant squid has come a long way. The image of it today is-vastly different from the original myth. Though it does contain some common features, the myths are nothing but, that, myths. Ships will have no reason to fear this beautiful creature. We know so little about this species of squid we have no idea how many of them remain. The photos taken by the medusa have just scratched the surface. We have a long way to go before we can ever truly understand this species.

Picture courtesy of : Discovery

Give Blood

Give Life

Donate blood to the East Austin Blood Bank and

save a life today.