Bio Politics

3
Biopolitics 1 Biopolitics The term "biopolitics" or "biopolitical" can refer to several different yet often compatible concepts. The term originates with Rudolf Kjellén in the 1920s who also coined the term geopolitics. In contemporary US political science studies, usage of the term is mostly divided between a post-modernist group using the meaning assigned by Michel Foucault (denoting social and political power over life) and another group who uses it to denote studies relating biology and political science. [1] Various definitions of biopolitics 1. In Kjellén's organicist view, the state was quasi-biological organism, a "super-individual creature". Kjellén sought to study "the civil war between social groups" (comprising the state) from a biological perspective and thus named his putative discipline "biopolitics". 2. The Nazis also used the term occasionally. For example, Hans Reiter used it in a 1934 speech to refer to their biologically based concept of nation and state and ultimately their racial policy. 3. Morley Roberts in his 1938 book Bio-politics used to argue that a correct model for world politics is "a loose association of cell and protozoa colonies". 4. Robert E. Kuttner used the term to refer to his particular brand of (self-named) "scientific racism," which he worked out with noted antisemites Eustace Mullins (with whom Kuttner cofounded the Institute for Biopolitics in the late 1950s), and Glayde Whitney, a behavioral geneticist . Kuttner and Mullins were inspired by Morley Roberts who was in turn inspired by Arthur Keith or both were inspired by each other and either co-wrote together(or with the Institute of Biopolitics) Biopolitics of Organic Materialism dedicated to Roberts and reprinted some of his works. 5. In the work of Foucault, the style of government that regulates populations through "biopower" (the application and impact of political power on all aspects of human life). [2] 6. In the works of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, anti-capitalist insurrection using life and the body as weapons; examples include flight from power and, 'in its most tragic and revolting form', suicide terrorism. Conceptualised as the opposite of biopower, which is seen as the practice of sovereignty in biopolitical conditions. [3] 7. The political application of bioethics. 8. A political spectrum that reflects positions towards the sociopolitical consequences of the biotech revolution. 9. Political advocacy in support of, or in opposition to, some applications of biotechnology. 10. Public policies regarding some applications of biotechnology. 11. Political advocacy concerned with the welfare of all forms of life and how they are moved by one another. 12. The politics of bioregionalism 13. The interplay and interdisciplinary studies relating biology and political science, primarily the study of the relationship between biology and political behavior. For example, the relationship of biology and political orientation, but also biological correlates of partisanship and voting behavior. (See also sociobiology.) Foucault and biopolitics French philosopher and social theorist Michel Foucault first discussed his thoughts on biopolitics in his lecture series "Society Must Be Defended" given at the Collège de France from 19751976. Foucault's concept of biopolitics is largely derived from his own notion of biopower, and the extension of state power over both the physical and political bodies of a population. While only mentioned briefly in his "Society Must Be Defended" lectures, biopolitics has recently seen a surge in prominence among academics and social critics. Foucault first mentioned biopolitics on 17 March 1976, during his "Society Must Be Defended" lectures. He described it as "a new technology of power...[that] exists at a different level, on a different scale, and [that] has a

description

hi

Transcript of Bio Politics

Page 1: Bio Politics

Biopolitics 1

BiopoliticsThe term "biopolitics" or "biopolitical" can refer to several different yet often compatible concepts.The term originates with Rudolf Kjellén in the 1920s who also coined the term geopolitics. In contemporary USpolitical science studies, usage of the term is mostly divided between a post-modernist group using the meaningassigned by Michel Foucault (denoting social and political power over life) and another group who uses it to denotestudies relating biology and political science.[1]

Various definitions of biopolitics1. In Kjellén's organicist view, the state was quasi-biological organism, a "super-individual creature". Kjellén

sought to study "the civil war between social groups" (comprising the state) from a biological perspective andthus named his putative discipline "biopolitics".

2. The Nazis also used the term occasionally. For example, Hans Reiter used it in a 1934 speech to refer to theirbiologically based concept of nation and state and ultimately their racial policy.

3. Morley Roberts in his 1938 book Bio-politics used to argue that a correct model for world politics is "a looseassociation of cell and protozoa colonies".

4. Robert E. Kuttner used the term to refer to his particular brand of (self-named) "scientific racism," which heworked out with noted antisemites Eustace Mullins (with whom Kuttner cofounded the Institute for Biopolitics inthe late 1950s), and Glayde Whitney, a behavioral geneticist . Kuttner and Mullins were inspired by MorleyRoberts who was in turn inspired by Arthur Keith or both were inspired by each other and either co-wrotetogether(or with the Institute of Biopolitics) Biopolitics of Organic Materialism dedicated to Roberts andreprinted some of his works.

5. In the work of Foucault, the style of government that regulates populations through "biopower" (the applicationand impact of political power on all aspects of human life).[2]

6. In the works of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, anti-capitalist insurrection using life and the body as weapons;examples include flight from power and, 'in its most tragic and revolting form', suicide terrorism. Conceptualisedas the opposite of biopower, which is seen as the practice of sovereignty in biopolitical conditions.[3]

7. The political application of bioethics.8. A political spectrum that reflects positions towards the sociopolitical consequences of the biotech revolution.9. Political advocacy in support of, or in opposition to, some applications of biotechnology.10. Public policies regarding some applications of biotechnology.11. Political advocacy concerned with the welfare of all forms of life and how they are moved by one another.12. The politics of bioregionalism13. The interplay and interdisciplinary studies relating biology and political science, primarily the study of the

relationship between biology and political behavior. For example, the relationship of biology and politicalorientation, but also biological correlates of partisanship and voting behavior. (See also sociobiology.)

Foucault and biopoliticsFrench philosopher and social theorist Michel Foucault first discussed his thoughts on biopolitics in his lecture series"Society Must Be Defended" given at the Collège de France from 1975–1976. Foucault's concept of biopolitics islargely derived from his own notion of biopower, and the extension of state power over both the physical andpolitical bodies of a population. While only mentioned briefly in his "Society Must Be Defended" lectures,biopolitics has recently seen a surge in prominence among academics and social critics.Foucault first mentioned biopolitics on 17 March 1976, during his "Society Must Be Defended" lectures. Hedescribed it as "a new technology of power...[that] exists at a different level, on a different scale, and [that] has a

Page 2: Bio Politics

Biopolitics 2

different bearing area, and makes use of very different instruments." More than a disciplinary mechanism, Foucault'sbiopolitics acts as a control apparatus exerted over a population as a whole or, as Foucault stated, "a global mass." Inthe years that followed, Foucault continued to develop his notions of the biopolitical in his "The Birth of Biopolitics"and "The Courage of Truth" lectures.Foucault gave numerous examples of biopolitical control when he first mentioned the concept in 1976. Theseexamples include "ratio of births to deaths, the rate of reproduction, the fertility of a population, and so on." Hecontrasted this method of social control with political power in the Middle Ages. Whereas in the Middle Agespandemics made death a permanent and perpetual part of life, this has shifted around the end of the 18th century.The development of vaccines and medicines dealing with public hygiene allowed death to be held (and/or withheld)from certain populations. This was the introduction of "more subtle, more rational mechanisms: insurance, individualand collective savings, safety measures, and so on."

Notes[1][1] Liesen, Laurette T. and Walsh, Mary Barbara, The Competing Meanings of 'Biopolitics' in Political Science: Biological and Post-Modern

Approaches to Politics (2011). APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper[2] Michel Foucault: Security,Territory,Population p.1 (2007)[3] Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri (2005). Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. Hamish Hamilton.

External links• Steinmann, Kate. Apparatus, Capture, Trace: Photography and Biopolitics (http:/ / fillip. ca/ content/

apparatus-capture-trace-photography-and-biopolitics) in: Fillip. Fall 2011.

Page 3: Bio Politics

Article Sources and Contributors 3

Article Sources and ContributorsBiopolitics  Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=599181490  Contributors: Al Lemos, Alex Oleskin, Alexjohnc3, Alf.laylah.wa.laylah, Amberrock, Bhny, Biopolitics InternationalOrganization, Brossow, Chealer, Criticlmind, Dysepsion, Edward, Esperant, Fillipta1, Goethean, Gregbard, Ground Zero, Icairns, John Vandenberg, Khawaga, Lapaz, Levineps, Loremaster,Meatsgains, Nick.ruiz, Northamerica1000, Omnipaedista, Parneix, Portlandium, Qwertyus, Raven820, Richardlord50, Rjwilmsi, Robert Pollard, SEWilco, Samuel Blanning, Second Quantization,Stitchingreader, Tango, The Vintage Feminist, Tijfo098, Vaneb, Zarkumo, 65 anonymous edits

LicenseCreative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/