Attribute Measurement Systems Analysis using A Binary Random
Binary non coherent in random phase channel
-
Upload
yogesh-singh -
Category
Engineering
-
view
99 -
download
2
Transcript of Binary non coherent in random phase channel
Performance of binary Non-
orthogonal signals in Random
Phase channels
YOGESH SINGH
Performance of Binary non-
orthogonal signals• For binary case, the probability of error can be simplified
much further as:
• The receiver compares are still given by eq. 5.94 and 5.94b of Simon.
• Multiplying Zci and Zsi, i=0,1, by , we have:
νc0 = Zc0 = 2Es/No+uc0
……. (5.110)
νs0 = zs0 = us0
0,1ifor , and where and 22
10 zzzz sicisici
NEs 02
NE s
0
2
NE s
0
2
2
Cnt'd…
assuming m0 was transmitted. The Gaussian noise variables,
are zero-mean, unit variance with
E{uc0 uc1}=E{us0 us1}=(2Es/N0)α, E{uc0 us1}= -E{uc1 us0} =
(2Es/N0)β.
The probability of error, assuming message m0 is transmitted, is
equal to the probability that exceeds or
…..(5.112)
Which requires the computation of the joint pdf .
General quadratic form in complex-valued RV by,
…..(5.113)
uuuu sccand
11s00, ,
1v
1v
),(10
yxfvv
)(**
3
*
3
2
2
2
11
xyAyxAyAxA kkkkkk
L
k
A
dxdyyxPEx
vvvvs fmmP ),()/()/(0
100010
3
Cnt'd…
where A1, A2, A3 are constants and {xk,yk} are pairs of correlated
complex-valued Gaussian random variables.
Consequently the variables and
are Rician and independent and the probability of error reduces to
the probability that one Rician variable exceeds another
independent Rician variable. Defining the vector x as,
…..(5.114)
then the mean and covariance ,
…..(5.115)
vv swcww
2
0,
2
0,0, vv swcww
2
1,
2
1,1,
) ( 1100 vvvvx scsc
TT
0
1
)(
)(
0
)(
0
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
NE
ms
x
NE
NE
NE
s
s
s
4
Cnt'd…
And also,
…..(5.116)
Due to the symmetry of the problem, it is easily shown that
Ps(E/m0)=Ps(E/m1)=Ps(E). Hence, the error probability is
given by,
…..(5.117)
Where,
10
01
10
01
0
2
NE s
x
)0()( QxP x
T
sPE
5
Cnt'd…
1000
0100
0010
0001
Q …..(5.119)
6
Cnt'd…
In order to whiten the vector x, we need to perform a linear
nonsingular transformation Ƭ on x which diagonalizes ,
xw=Ƭx …..(5.120)
One such transformation is given by,
…..(5.121)
Where,
k= …..(5.122)
x
k
k
k
k
kk
s
10
01
10
01
)1(2
EN0
22
1
7
Cnt'd…
Also,
…..(5.123)
…..(5.124)
Hence, the probability of error becomes,
.....(5.125)
Where are unit variance uncorrelated
Gaussian (and hence independent) RV with mean
xxNE
xxQx w
T
w
s
w
T
wx
T
T
x
QkQ
x
T
w
0
1 21
2
1,
2
1,
2
0,
2
0,
00
swcwswcw
w
T
wx
T
s
P
QPPE xxQxP
1,1,0,0, and ,,
swcwswcw
8
Cnt'd…
…..(5.126)
The optimum receiver compares the pdf of is,
…..(5.127)
…..(5.128)
k
k
kk
kkxEE
NENE
NENE
x
s
s
s
s
w
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
12
12
iww ,
2
0, and
iw,
)1(
)1(
2exp
0
2
1
0
2
0
0
22
0,
k
k
where
NE
s
NE
s
sIs
mf
s
s
i
i
iw
9
Cnt'd…
Hence, the probability of error becomes,
……(5.129)
Which is similar to (5.112) except the variables are now
independent. The Rician RV(s) R0 and R1, the probability that R1
exceeds R0 is given by,
P=Prob (R0< R1)
…...(5.130)
…..(5.131)
dydxyx
PE
x
wws
ff
mP
ww
1,0
0,
00,1,
)(
and 1,0, ww
2
1
2
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
2
1
02
1
2
0
2
0
and
2exp,
ss
I
ba
where
abba
baQ
10
Cnt'd…
In our case 1 and,
…..(5.132)
With . Hence, the probability of error for two
nonorthogonal signals is given by,
…..(5.133)
2
0
2
1
2
00
2
00
112
)1(2
112
)1(2
NE
NE
NE
NE
ss
ss
kb
ka
j
NE
INE
NE
NE
P
ss
ss
sQE
22 0
0
0
2
0
2
0
exp2
1
112
.112
11
Cnt'd…
which is identical to 1-Ps(C) as given by (5.109) in M-ary
equicorrelated signals. It is clear that orthogonal signals (i.e. ρ=0)
minimizes Ps(E). In this case, Ps(E) reduces to,
…..(5.134)
But since , then
…..(5.135)
Consider the cross-correlation between two FSK signals at
frequencies f0 and f1. then the coss-correlation between the
corresponding complex baseband signals is,
NE
NE
NE
P
x
NE
NE
P
sss
s
ss
s
E
xQ
QE
222
2
000
2
00
exp2
1exp
2
1exp
2exp,0
exp2
1,0
12
Cnt'd…
T
T
f
T
Tdt
ff
T
dtf
Tf
T
f
f
ef
fe
eEeEE
tjT
tj
tj
s
Ttj
s
s
1,0
1,0
2
1,0
1,0
0
)(2
2
0
2
sin
sin1
222
1
1,010
10
13