Bill Stack

23
Saving our watersheds by greening our cities January 12, 2011 Bill Stack Center for Watershed Protection

description

Smart Growth and Watershed Implementation Plans Panelist

Transcript of Bill Stack

Page 1: Bill Stack

Saving our

watersheds by

greening our cities

January 12, 2011

Bill Stack

Center for Watershed

Protection

Page 2: Bill Stack

Citizen

Stewardship

35%

Redevelopment

15%

Stormwater

Retrofitting

50%

3-Way Partnership

Page 3: Bill Stack

Stream Restoration, Urban Best Management

Practices, Community Greening, In-line Debris

Collection, Infrastructure Cleaning and Inspection,

Development Greening

The Green RenaissanceIt’s what the public wants

Cost of the Program: $32 Million Per Year

Benefits:

Page 4: Bill Stack

Harder to implement without CSOs

Page 5: Bill Stack

River Valley Watersheds

Page 6: Bill Stack

Vacant Lands = SWM opportunities

Page 7: Bill Stack

How do we develop a

watershed

restoration plan with

active community

leadership for an

area of enclosed

streams where the

environmental quality

and social fabric of

the watershed are

both impaired?

Watershed Community Collaboration

Page 8: Bill Stack

Restoration

projects should

be selected

with an

understanding

of their

interactions and

how they will

perform in

synergy to

impact the

watershed.

Page 9: Bill Stack
Page 10: Bill Stack

Neighborhood Assessment

• Neighborhood Source Assessment (NSA)

• Hotspot Site Investigation (HSI)

• Pervious Area Assessment (PAA)

• Streets and Storm Drains (SSD)Two levels of BMP screening needed

Page 11: Bill Stack

Project Selection

• The presence of trees,

utilities (i.e., gas, electric,

water, sanitary sewer,

etc.), very compacted

urban soils, and a general

lack of space ruled out a

lot of projects and BMP

types…

– Only 35 sites were

investigated in detail

– The list of potential BMP

types was trimmed down to

about 5

Don’t forget public out-reach at program and project scales

Page 12: Bill Stack

Paired watershed

monitoring design

Monitoring, Evaluation and Research

Methods

Compare Median Concentration Storm Samples

Lead, Total

2018

46

44

16

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Hamilton

Storm EMC

Radecke

Storm EMC

Lanvale St.

Storm Comp

Baltimore St.

Storm Comp

National

Storm EMC

Lead

, T

ota

l (u

g/L

)

Medians Current Lab Reporting Limit

Pollution Hotspot

Page 13: Bill Stack

Monitoring Stations

Page 14: Bill Stack

Ultra Urban Watershed

Page 15: Bill Stack

School Greening: before and after

Page 16: Bill Stack

Design and Construction• Construction

Note prefab tree planter boxes

Page 17: Bill Stack

B-1 Plaza Bioretention

Post- Construction

Pre-Construction

During

Construction

Page 18: Bill Stack

B-15: Tree Box Inlet with

Curb Extension and

BioretentionPost- Construction

Pre-Construction

During

Construction

Page 19: Bill Stack

C-13: Filterra Unit

Post- Construction

Pre-Construction

During

Construction

Page 20: Bill Stack

I-1: Impervious Cover

Removal

Post- Construction

Pre-Construction

During

Construction

(Tried deep soil tilling)

Page 21: Bill Stack
Page 22: Bill Stack

Figure 9: Sidewalk enhancements on Collington between Lombard and Baltimore

Streets

Figure 10: Bump out at Collington and Lombard Street

Power of the people

Page 23: Bill Stack

www.awsps.org

Member Benefits

Two issues of the Watershed Science Bulletin

Substantial webcast discounts

50% discounts on publications

Subscription to our quarterly e-newsletter, Runoff Rundown