Bike Share
24
description
Bike Share. Green Apple Move Out. Two Birds, One Stone. Community Agriculture Club. Igoe Renewable Energy Project. NYU Green Lease. National comparison : Grants Funded. NATIONAL COMPARISON: INTEREST. Internal analysis: grant Budget size. Internal analysis: recipient type. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Bike Share
Bike Share
Green Apple Move Out
Two Birds, One Stone
Community Agriculture Club
Igoe Renewable Energy Project
NYU Green Lease
NATIONAL COMPARISON: GRANTS FUNDED
SIUC
Penn
NYU
Princet
on
UCB-TGIF MIT
GMC
UCIrvine
UCB-CACSWWC
UHManoa
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
26
18 18
15
11
7 6 64 4
1
26
18
53
3033
20
30
6
3134
1
Numberof GrantsFunded
Average Number of Grants Funded Per Year
Total Grants Funded
Num
ber o
f Gra
nts
NATIONAL COMPARISON: INTEREST
NYU SIUC
UCB-TGIF
Penn
UCIrvine
GMC
UHManoa
WWC0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
5447
33
2114
7 5 5
163
47
100
2114
35
5
43
Quantity of Proposals Submitted
Average Number of Proposals Submitted YearlyTotal Number of Proposals Submitted
Prop
osal
s Sub
mitt
ed
WWCGMC
NYU SIUC
UCB-TGIF
UHManoa
UCIrvine
Penn
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
5.00%
4.30% 4.27%
0.26% 0.21% 0.17% 0.10% 0.05% 0.05%
Percent of Elgible Campus Members who Submitted Applications
Num
ber o
f Pro
posa
ls Su
bmitt
ed/
Elg
ibal
e Po
pula
tion
Pool
INTERNAL ANALYSIS: GRANT BUDGET SIZE
$0-$1,500 $1,501-$5,000 $5,001-$999 $10,000+0
5
10
15
20
25
Green Grants by Original Budget
OverallLast Cycle
Original Budget of Grant
Num
ber o
f Pro
ject
s
INTERNAL ANALYSIS: RECIPIENT TYPE
Undergrad-uate
Staff Faculty Graduate0
5
10
15
20
25
Grant Recipients by Project Leader Type
OverallLast Cycle
Num
ber o
f Pro
ject
s
INTERNAL ANALYSIS: GRANT TYPE
Operations
Enga
gemen
t
Operations &
Enga
gemen
t
Researc
h
Researc
h & Enga
gemen
t
Operations, R
esearc
h & Enga
gemen
t02468
1012141618
Green Grants by Project Type
OverallLast Cycle
Num
ber o
f Pro
ject
s
INTERNAL ANALYSIS: COMPLETION RATE
Completed
Completed, awaiti
ng docu
mentation
Defunct
In Progress
0
5
10
15
20
25
Completion Rate
Num
ber o
f Pro
ject
s
INTERNAL ANALYSIS: REASONS FOR FAILURE
Top three reasons projects become defunct:1)Personnel leave NYU2)Project leader abandoned
project3)Project leader decided to pursue
project outside of Green Grant Support
INTERNAL ANALYSIS: PI TYPE VS. SUCCESS
Undergraduates Graduate Students Faculty Staff0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Completed Project Leader Type by Success Rate
SuccessfulIncompleteDefunct
Num
ber o
f Pro
ject
s
Successful: 73% 71% 71% 50% Defunct: 27% 29% 29% 50%
INTERNAL ANALYSIS: GROUP TYPE VS. SUCCESS
Collaboration Solo0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Completed Project Group Type by Success Rate
SuccessfulIncompleteDefunct
Num
ber o
f Pro
ject
s
INTERNAL ANALYSIS: BUDGET SIZE VS. SUCCESS
INTERNAL ANALYSIS: BUDGET SIZE VS. SUCCESS
NYU GREEN GRANTS: EXTENSIONS
INTERNAL ANALYSIS: STAFFING
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Green Grants Assistant Position: Contri-bution to Completion Rate
DefunctCurrent Anticipated Completion RateAnticipated Completion Rate before Position
Proj
ect C
ompl
etion
Rat
e
INTERNAL ANALYSIS: STAFFINGGreen Grants Assistant: Ratio of Time Spent on Major Tasks
Payments34%
Planning &Execution
28%
Outreach &Communications
21%
Institutionalization17%
NYU GREEN GRANTS: MOVING FORWARD
NATIONAL COMPARISON: SELECTIVITY
UHManoa
NYU
UCB-TGIF
UCIrvine
SIUC
WWC
GMCPen
n0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percentage of Proposals Funded
FundedRejected
Perc
enta
ge o
f Sub
mitt
ed P
ropo
sals
WWC
NYU
Prince
tonNAU
UCB-TGIF
SIUC
MIT
UHManoa
Penn
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%100%
40% 40%
33%28%
20%17% 16%
11%
Percent of Selection Committee Members who are Experts
Perc
ent o
f mem
bers
who
ar e
xper
ts
