Big “D” & The Measuring Stick

U N D E R S TA N D I N G T H E S T O RY O F N U M B E R S

BIG “D” & THE MEASURING STICK

Dignified/Dinos United/Unidos Problem-Solver/Solutionista Humble/Humildes Diligent/Diligentes

SESSION OVERVIEW

• Objective: • We will analyze SY13 TCAP data to determine areas for

intentional development in SY14.• We will evaluate our Pacing Guides (and P/S standards)

for inclusion of areas of intentional development – and add them, if necessary.

• Exit Ticket: • How does your Pacing Guide now reflect what the TCAP

data tells you?


GUIDING QUESTIONS


What went well?What needs work?

WHO struggled in “needs work”?

Why?

CASE STUDY: 3G READING

U PP P A0

102030405060708090

100SY13 RFMA Reading vs CSI Reading

5666

29

19

13 112

4




U PP P A0

102030405060708090

100

LowMi High

Reading Levels by Performance Buckets


P0

102030405060708090

100

56

77

Change in P/A with HPP


MINING THE SHEET


Drop Down Arrow =

Sort Function Enabled

Blue = Hidden Info

Total Proficiency Level Proficiency Level in Sub-

Content Area

Scale Score

Student Specific Performance Section:

Question NumberType (MC/CR)Point Value

Scale Score & PLStandard & Sub-Content

Performance % Dis/School


DATA SORT

• Data sheet for 3G Reading• Sorting for:• Target area Magonistas = HPP + LP• What worked?• What needs work?• WHO needs work here? • Why do they need work (if you are able to answer this

question)?


HPP Performance• FicPoe = 5/9 P+• NonFic = 1/9 P+

(11%)• Voc = 3/9 P+ (33%)

• MC >50% = 4/9 (44%)• CR >50%= 5/9*

LP Performance• FicPoe = 11/14 P+• NonFic = 7/14 P+

(50%)• Voc = 11/14 P+

• MC >50% = 13/14• CR >50% = 9/14

(64%)Dignified/Dinos United/Unidos Problem-Solver/Solutionista Humble/Humildes Diligent/Diligentes

Performance At-a-Glance


• WHO struggled?• HPP as target

audience• Evaluate HPP

performance for trends


8/9 BP on NF (SA2)

6/9 BP on V (SA3)

Sub Content Areas



Mining the Trends of Non Fiction & Vocab

Sub Content Areas & Benchmarks

Question Performance



Question level error analysis to determine what Sub Area Content Standard Benchmarks are of highest priority.



Frameworks and Fact Sheet Packets to Evaluate Supporting CAS Standards for Prior Teaching

Evaluate for Presence in Priority/Supporting Standards and Pacing Guide for SY14

SMALL GROUP WORK


• 45m – 60m• Based on groups listed below, you will run this process again

with the sixth grade writing data. • At the end of work, we will share out team findings and

evaluations of pacing guides. • ASK QUESTIONS!

1 2 3 4 5KaraAzucenaJacareZachMarcelino

CruzJasmineHeatherMaryLuz

CharleneJamesMarissaCollin

Brittany DeborahAdonia Emma

David R. David C. SusanaMandi

YOU DO


• 60m – 90m• You will receive the data from your grade level and run this

same process for tested areas. • Or you will look at 3RG data to identify how you can be pro-

active based on performance.


EXIT TICKET

How does your Pacing Guide now reflect what the TCAP data tells you?

TCAP SUMMARY SY13


Reading Writing Math Science0

102030405060708090

100

RFMACSI


HPP IMPACT

Read-ing

Writing Math Science0

102030405060708090

100

RFMA - NRFMA - OCSI

Big “D” & The Measuring Stick

Documents

Transcript of Big “D” & The Measuring Stick