Bibliography

1. Richmond, Phyllis Allen, "fchnt Are We Looking For?"; Science% vol. 139* February 22f 1965#

2% G. Salton, Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval; McGraw Hill Book Co., 19&8, Chapter I.

3. G. Salton, Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval; ilcGraw Hill Book Co., 19o©t Chapter II.

4. G. Salton and M. E. Lesk; Computer Evaluation of In­dexing and Text Processing; Scientific Report No. ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation Section III, De­partment of Computer Science, Cornell University; June, 1967.

5« G. Saltonf Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval; McGraw Hill Book Co., 19bb, Chapter VII.

6. M. E. Lesk and G. Salton; Evaluation of Interactive Search and Retrieval Methods Using Automatic Informa­tion Displays; Technical Report No. 68-17t Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, revised September, 1968.

7. ti. Rubinoff, S. Bergman, W. Franks, and 3. Rubinoff; Experimental Evaluation of Information Retrieval Through a Teletypewriter; Communications of the ACM, Volume 11, No* 9f September, 1968.

6. J. J. Rocchio, Relevance Feedback in Information Re­trieval; Report ISR-9 to the National Science Founda­tion, Chapter 23.

9# J. J. Rocchio, Document Retrieval System Optimization and Evaluation; Harvard University Doctoral Thesis, Report ISR-10 to the National Science Foundation, Har­vard Computation Laboratory; June, 196%

10. J. J. Rocchio, G. Salton, Search Optimization and Iter­ative Retrieval Techniques; Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference« Las Vegas, November, 196%

llo 0. W. Riddle, T. Horwitz, R. Dietz, Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval Systems; Report ISR-11 to the National Science Foundation, Chapter 6, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University; June, 1966.

12. R. Crawford and H. Melzer; The Use of Relevant Documents Instead of Queries in Relevance Feedback; Scientific Re­port No* ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation, Section XIII; Department of Computer Science, Cornell University) October, 1968.

i

1$. D. Steinbuhlsr and C. Aleta; Negative Relevance Feed­back Process; student reports, Computer Science 43bt Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Spring, 1968.

14 • J* Kelly; Negative Response Relevance Feedback; Scien­tific Report No. ISR-12 to the National Science Founda­tion Section IX, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University; June, 1967•

15# 0* Salton, The Evaluation of Automatic Retrieval Pro­cesses, Selected Test Results Usine; the Sf/ART System; American Documentation. Vol* 16, No. 3* July* 196%

16« F. Wilcoxon, R. Wilcox, Some Rapid Approximate Statis­tical Procedures; Lederle Laboratories, America Cyanamid Company, 1964.

17« H. Hall, N. Weiderman, The Evaluation rroblem in Rele­vance Feedback Systems; Scientific Report No. ISR-12 to the National Science Poundation, Section XII, De­partment of Computer Science, Cornell University, June, 1967.

16. C. Cleverdon, E. IA. Keen, Factors Determining the Per­formance of Indexing Systems, Vol. 2, ASLIB Cranfield Research Project, 1966, Chapter III.

19* fcU Leak, G. Salton, Design Criteria for Automatic In­formation Systems, Report ISR-11 to the National Science Foundation, Chapter V, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, June 1966.

20# G. Salton, Automatic Information Organization and Re­trieval ; McGraw Hill Book Co., 1968, Chapter VlT"

21# R. Steel, J. Torrie, Principles & Procedures of Sta­tistics, McGraw Hill Book Co., i960, Chapter 2T.~

22« G. Salton, Search Strategy^and The Optimization of Re­trieval Sffectiveness; Scientific Report No. ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation, Section V* Depart- , ment of Computer Science, Cornell University; June, 1967»

25# Leech and Matlack; Information Retrieval: Dictionary Representation and Cluster Evaluation; Scientific Report No# ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation, Section VII, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University; June, 1967•

24# Williamson, Williamson, and Ide; The Cornell Programs for Cluster Searching and Relevance Feedback, Scientific He-port No. ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation, Sec­tion 17, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University; June| 1967»

205

25# R« Grauer and M. Messier, An Evaluation of Pocchiof8 Clustering Algorithm, Scientific Report No* ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation, Section VT, Department of Computer Sciencef Cornell University, Junef 1V67.

26* A. Borodin, L# Kerr, F# Lewis, Query Splitting in Relevance Feedback Systems, Scientific Report No# ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation, Section XII, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, October, l'768o

27© M# Davis, M« Linsky, M. Zelkowitz; A Relevance Feedback System Employing a Dynamically evolving Document Space; Scientific Report No, ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation, Section X, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, October, 1^68.

23. £• Brauen, R. Holt, T* wilcox, Index Space Modification Based on Relevance Feedback, Scientific Report Noa ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation, Section XI, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, October, 1968.

29* No Nilseon^ Learning M chines. New Yorki McGraw-Hill, 196%