Bibliography - shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.inshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/13606/... ·...
Transcript of Bibliography - shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.inshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/13606/... ·...
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
188
Bibliography
Aarts, Bas. (2005). Conceptions of categorization in the history of linguistics. In
Language Sciences 28 (2006). Elsevier Ltd, 361-385.
Abbi, Anvita. (1994). Semantic universals in Indian languages. Shimla: Indian
Institute of Advanced Study, Rashtrapati Nivas.
Allerton, D.J. (1979). Essentials of Grammatical Theory: A Consensus View of
Syntax and Morphology. London: Rougtledge and Kegan Paul.
Allwood, J., Gardenfors, P. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive Semantics: Meaning and
Cognition. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, PA.
Alm-Arvius, C. (1993). The English Verb See: A Study in Multiple Meaning.
Goteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitas Gothoburgensis.
Alm-Arvius, Christina. (2005). Types of polysemy variation. English Department.
Stockholm University, Sweden.
Apresjan, J.D. (1973). Regular Polysemy. In Linguistics, 142: 5-32.
Austin, J.L. (1961). Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baker, M.C. (2003). Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge
Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bakula Rangdol Nima. (2005). A Ladakhi Grammar. Cultural Preservation &
Promotion Society, Achinathang, Leh (Ladakh).
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
189
Baldinger, Kurt. (1980). Semantic Theory towards a modern semantics. Basil
Blackwell. Oxford.
Barcelona, A. (1997). Clarifying and Applying the Notions of Metaphor and
Metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics. Atlantis XIX.1: 21-48.
Barcelona, Antonio (ed.). (2003). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads.
New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barcelona, Antonio. (2001). On the systematic contrastive analysis of conceptual
metaphors: case studies and proposed methodology. In Putz, Martin,
Susanne Niemeier and Rene Dirven (eds.), Applied Cognitive Linguistics
II: Language Pedagogy. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barcelona, Antonio. (2003). Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: An Analysis and
a Few Modest Proposal. In Cuyckens, Hubert, Thomas Berg, Rene Dirven
and Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Motivation in Language.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Barcelona, Antonio. (2003a). Introduction. The cognitive theory of metaphor and
metonymy. In Barcelona, Antonio (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the
Crossroads. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barcelona, Antonio. (2003b). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic
motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Barcelona, Antonio (ed.),
Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin, New York: Mouton
de Gruyter.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
190
Bauer, J. (1949). Die Ausdrucke fur ‘schauen’ in den Mundarten Italiens und der
Sudschweiz (nach dem AIS). Erlangen.
Bechtel, F. (1879). Uber die Bezeichnungen der sinnlichen Wahrnehmungen in
den indogermanischen Sprachen. Ein Britrag zur Bedeutungsgeschichte.
Weimer.
Beretta, Alan, Fiorentino, Robert and Poeppel, David. (2005). The effects of
homonymy and polysemy on lexical access. An MEG study. Department of
Linguistics. Machigan State University, A-628 Wells Hall, East Lansing,
MI 48824 USA.
Best, J.B. (1992). Cognitive Psychology (third edition). West Publishing
Company, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Bhatrihari. (AD 450). Vaakyapadiya (dealing with the philosophy of grammar).
Bilkova, Ilona. (2000). Czech and English Idioms of Body Parts: A view from
Cognitive Semantics. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Glasgow.
Blutner, R. (1998a). Lexical pragmatics. Journal of Semantics, 15: 115-162.
Boers, F. (1996). Sptail Prepositions and Metaphor. A Cogntive Semantic Journey
along the UP-DOWN and the FRONT-BACK Dimensions. Tubingen:
Gunter Narr Verlag.
Boers, Frank. (1999). When a bodily Source Domain Becomes Prominent: The
Joy of counting Metaphors in the Socio-Economic domain. In Gibbs,
Raymond W. Jr. and Gerard J. Steenn (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
191
Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing
Company.
Boguraev, B.K. (1979). Automatic Resolution of Word-Sense Ambiguity. Ph.D.
thesis, Cambridge University.
Bohnemeyer, J. (2004). When Going means Becoming Gone: Framing Motion as
State Change in Yukatek. Session “The Expression of PATH in the
languages of the Americas” at the 2004 Annual Meeting of SSILA, Boston,
MA, January 8011.
Briscoe, E.J., Copestake, A.A., & Boguraev, B.K. (1990). Enjoy the paper: lexical
semantics via lexicology. In COLING 90, Vol. 2: 42-47 Helsinki.
Brugman, C. (1981). The Story of Over. MA thesis. University of California at
Berkeley. Distributed by L.A.U.T. July 1993. Series A. Paper Nr. 102.
Brugman, C. (1988). The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of
the Lexicon. New York: Garland.
Buck, C.D. (1949). A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-
European Languages. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Byrd, R.J. (1989). Discovering relationships among word senses. In Dictionaries
in the Electronic Age: Proc. Fifth Ann. Conf. of the UW Centre for the
New OED, 67-80 Oxford.
Cadierno, Teresa. (2004). Expressing Motion events in a second Language: a
Cognitive Typological Perspective. In Achard, Michel and Susanne
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
192
Niemeier (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and
Foreign Language Teaching. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cann, Ronnie. (1993). Formal Semantics: An introduction. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Caplan, D. (1973). A note on the abstract readings of verbs of perception.
Cognition 2.3: 269-77.
Caramaza, A., Grober, E. (1976). Polysemy and the structure of the subjective
lexicon. In Georgetown University Round Table on Language and
Linguistics, 1976 (C. Rameh, ed.), 181-206. Georgetown University Press,
Washington, DC.
Casad, H. Eugene (ed.) (1996). Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The
Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics. New York: Mouton de
Gruyter Berlin.
Census Report. 2001. Census of India.
Chapell, Hilary and William McGregor (eds.). (1996). The grammar of
Inalienability: A typological perspective on body part terms and the part-
whole relation. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Charles, W.G. (1988a). Categorization of contextual information. Ph.D. Dept. of
Psychology, Princeton University.
Chatterjee, A. (1994). Understanding Vagueness. Delhi: Pragata Publications,
Delhi.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
193
Chen, Zelin. (1989). Zang xiang (Theory of internal organs). In Jin, Wentao (ed.),
Jiating Yixue Quanshu (Family Medicine). Shaghai Science and
Technology Press, Shanghai, 1003-1012.
Chierchia, G. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1990). Meaning and Grammar. An
Introduction to Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Chowdury, Bakul Chandra. (1974). M.A. dissertation on Segmental Phonemes of
Ladakhi.
Coleman, L., and Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: The English verb ‘lie’,
Language, 57.1.
Copestake, A., Briscoe, T. (1996). Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension.
In Lexical semantics: The problem of polysemy (J. Pustejovsky and B.
Boguraev, eds.), 15-67. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Copestake, A.A. & Briscoe, E.J. (1991). Lexical operations in a unification-based
framework. In Pustejovsky, J. & Bergler, S. (Eds.), Lexical semantics and
knowledge representation: ACLSIGLEX Workshop Berkeley, California.
Croft, William, Cruse, Allan. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, D. Alan. (2000). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and
Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cruse, D.A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, D.A. (1992). Monosemy vs. polysemy. Linguistics, 30: 577-599.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
194
Cruse, D.A. (1995). Polysemy and related phenomena from a cognitive linguistics
viewpoint. In P. St. Dizier and E. Viegas (eds.). Computational Lexical
Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 34-49.
Cruse, D.A. (1999). Lexical ‘facets’: Between monosemy ad polysmey. In
Sprachspiel and Bedeutung: Festschrift fur Franz Hundsnurscher zum 65.
Geburtstag (S. Beckmann, P.P. Konig, and G. Wolf, eds.), 25-36.
Niemeyer, Tubingen.
Csordas, Thomas J. (1994). Introduction: the body as representation and being-in-
the-world. In Csordas, Thomas J. (ed.), Embodiment and Experience: The
Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1-24.
Cuyckens, H., and Zawada, B. (2001). Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics.
Amsterdam, NJ: John Benjamins.
Cuyckens, Hubert, Awada, Britta (eds.). (2001). Polysemy in Cognitive
Linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Cuyckens, Hubert, Dirven, Rene, Taylor, John R. (eds.). (2003). Cognitive
Approaches to lexical semantics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York.
Danesi, M. (1990). Thinking is seeing: Visual metaphors and the nature of
abstract thought. Semiotica 80.3/4: 221-237.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
195
Dash, Niladri Sekhar. (2005). Role of context in word sense understanding. Indian
Linguistics. Journal of the Linguistic Society of India Vol. 65, No. 1-4. 66:
159-175. Deccan College, Pune.
Dash, Niladri Shekhar. (2001). Review of polysemy of Ravin, Yael and Leacock,
Claudia (eds.). (2000). Polysemy-Theoretical and Computational
Approaches. London: OUP.
Deane, P.D. (1987). Semantic Theory and the problem of polysemy. Ph.D.
dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.
Deane, P.D. (1988). Polysemy and cognition. Lingua, 75: 325-361.
Deignan, Alic and Liz Potter. (2004). A corpus study of metaphors and metonyms
in English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1231-1252.
Deignan, Alice and Potter, Liz. (2004). A corpus study of metaphors and
metonyms in English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1231-1252.
Dik, S.C. and K. Hengeveld. (1991). The hierarchical structure of the clause and
the typology of perception-verb complements. Linguistics 29: 231-259.
Dirven, R. (1993). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of
conceptualization. Leuvense Bijdragen 82: 1-28.
Dirven, Rene and Porings, Ralf (eds). (2002). Cognitive Linguistics: Metaphor
and Metonymy in comparison and contrast. Mouton de Gruyter.
Dolling, J. (1992). Polysmey and sort coercion in semantic representations. In
Discourse and lexical meaning (Arbeigspapiere des
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
196
Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, No 30) (P. Bosch and P. Gerstl, eds.), 61-
78.
Eaton, Trevor. (1972). Theoretical Semics. Mouton and Co. C.V. publishers. The
Hague.
Engen, T. (1982). The perception of Odours. New York: Academic Press.
Enghels, Renata. (2005). Les modalites de perception visuelle et auditive:
Differences cognitives et repercussions semantico-syntaxiques en
espagnol et en francais. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Gent,
Belgium.
Evans, Gareth and McDowell, John (eds.). (1976). Truth and Meaning: Essays in
Semantics. London: OUP
Evans, Nicholas, Wilkins, David. (2000). In the mind’s ear: The semantic
extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language,
Volume 76, Number 3 (2000), 546-593.
Evans, Nicholas, Wilkins, David. (2001). The complete person: Networking the
physical and the social. Forty years on: Ken Hale and Australian
languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 493-521.
Evans, Nicholas. (1992). Multiple semiotic systems, hyperpolysemy, and the
reconstruction of semantic change in Australian languages.
Evans, Nicholas. (2003). Context, Culture, and Structuration in the Languages of
Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 13-40.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
197
Evans, Vyvyan and Green, Melanie. (2005). Cognitive Linguistics: An
introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Evans, Vyvyan. (2005). The meaning of time: polysemy, the lexicon and
conceptual structure. In J. Linguistics 41 (2005). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 33-75.
Fass, D. (1991). Met*: A method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by
computer. Computational Linguistics, 17 (1), 49-90.
Fellbaum, C. (1990). English verbs as a semantic net. International Journal of
Lexicography, 3(4), 278-301.
Fenyvesi-Jobbagy, Katalin. (2004). Non-literal and non-metaphorical uses of
Danish komme ‘come’: A case study. UDC 81’ 373.612.2, Jezlkoslovlje
4.2: 225-244.
Ferguson, C.A. (1959). Diglossia. Word 15: 325-40.
Fernandez Jaen, Jorge. (2006). Verbos de percepcion sensorial en espanol: una
clasificacion cognitiva. Interlinguistica 16: 1-14.
Fieke Van der Gucht, Klaas Willems, Ludovic De Cuypere. (2006). The iconicity
of embodied meaning. Polysemy of spatial preposition in the cognitive
framework.
Fillmore, C.J. (1978). The organization of semantic information in the lexicon. In
Papers for the Parasession on the lexicon. Chicago Linguistics Society.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
198
Fillmore, C.J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.),
Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 111-138.
Fillmore, J. and Atkins, B.T.S. (1992). Towards a frame-based lexicon: the
semantics of risk and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer and E. Feder Kittay (eds.),
Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical
Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fillmore, J.C. (1966). Deictic categories in the semantics of come. In Foundations
of language, 2, 219-227.
Fillmore, J.C. (1971). Toward a Theory of Deixis. In University of Hawaii
working papers in linguistics, vol. 3, 219-242.
Fillmore, J.C. (1975). Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixix 1971. Bloomington: IULC.
Fillmore, J.C. (1982). Towards a Descriptive Framework for Spatial Deixis. In
Jarvella, R.J. and Klein, W. (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action. Studies in
deixis and related topics. Chichester (u.a.): John Wiley and Sons, 31-59.
Fillmore, J.C. (1983). How to Know Whether You’re Coming or Going. In Rauh,
G. (ed.), Essays on Deixis. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 219-227.
Fillmore, J.C. (1997). Lectures on Deixix. Standford: CSLI Publications.
Francke, A.H. (1901). Sketch of Ladakhi Grammar. journal of the Asiatic Society
of Bengal, Vol. 1xx, Part I, 1900, Extra No. 2. Calcutta.
Francke, A.H. (1905). A Lower Ladakhi Version of the Kesar Saga. Asian
Educational Services, New Delhi.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
199
Francke, A.H. (1979 edition). Ladakhi and Tibetan Grammar. Seema Publication,
Delhi.
Fujii, Yoko. (1999). The story of “break”: Cognitive categories of objects and the
system of verbs. In Hiraga, Masako, Chris Sinha and Sherman Wilcox
(eds.), Cultural, Psychological, and Typological Issues in Cognitive
Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing
Company.
Gale, W., church, K., and Yarowsky, D. (1992). A method for disambiguating
word senses in a large corpus. Computational and the Humanities 26:
415-439.
Garcia Hernandez, B. (1976). El campo semantico de ‘ver’ en la lengua Latina.
Estudio structural. Salamanca: Universad de Salamanca.
Garcia-Miguel, Jose Maria. (2005). Aproximacion empirica a la interaccion de
verbos y esquemas construccionales, ejemplificada con los verbos de
percepcion. Estudios de Linguistica Universidad de Alicante (ELUA) 19:
169-91.
Geeraerts, D. (1990). The lexicographical treatment of prototypical polysemy. In
Tsohatzidis, S.L. (Ed.), Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic
Classification, 195-210. Routledge, London.
Geeraerts, D. (1993). Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries, cognitive
linguistics 4.3: 223-273.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
200
Geeraerts, Dirk and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds). (2007). The Oxford Handbook of
Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ghassemzadeh, Habibollah. (2004). Vygotsky’s mediational psychology: A new
conceptualization of culture, signification and metaphor. In Language
Sciences 27 (2005). Elsevier Ltd, 281-300.
Gibbs, R. (1984). Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science,
8(3), 275-304.
Gibbs, R.W.Jr. (1994). The Poetics of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Gibbs, Raymond W. (1996). What’s cognitive about cognitive linguistics? In
Rene Dirven, Ronald W. Langacker and John R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive
Linguistics in the Redwoods, The Expansion of a New Paradigm in
Linguistics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gibbs, Raymond W. (1996). Why many concepts are metaphorical? Cognitive 61:
309-319.
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. and Gerard J. Steen (eds.). (1999). Metaphor in Cognitive
Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing
Company.
Gibson, J.J. (1950). The Perception of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton-
Mifflin.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
201
Gibson, J.J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston:
Houghton-Mifflin.
Gisborne, N. (1996). English Perception Verbs. PhD Dissertation. University
College London.
Goatly, Andrew. (1997). The languages of Metaphors. Routledge 11, New Fetter
Lane, London EC 4P 4EE.
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.). (1994). Semantic and Lexical
Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings. John Benjamins Publishing
Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Goddard, Cliff. (2004). The lexical semantics of culture. In Language Sciences 27
(2005). Elsevier Ltd, 51-73.
Goosens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in
expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 323-340.
Gorfein, S. David. (1989). Resolving Semantic Ambiguity. New York: Springer-
Verlag.
Grierson, G.A. (1927). Linguistic Survey of India, Vol-III, Part-I, 51-70. Low
Price Publications, Delhi.
Gupta, K. Manohar. (2006). Linguistic Approach to Meaning in Pali. Sundeep
Prakashan, Delhi.
Halliday, M.A. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London,
Baltimore and Melbourne: Edward Arnold.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
202
Hamid, Abdul. (1998). Ladakhi-English-Urdu Dictionary. Melong Publication,
Leh, Ladakh.
Hanks, Patrick (ed.). (2008). Lexicology: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, vol. I
to VI. Routledge.
Haser, Verena. (2003). Metaphor in semantic change. In Barcelona, Antonio (ed.),
Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin, New York: Mouton de
Gruyter.
Heine, B., U. Claudi and F. Hunnenmeyer. (1991). Grammaticalization. A
Conceptual Framework. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Held, R. (1988). Readings from the Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Sensory
Systems I: Vision and Visual Systems. Boston, Basel: BirkHauser.
Herskovits, Annette. (1986). Language and Spatial Cognition: An
Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Bosto, Basel:
Birkhauser.
Hirst, G. (1987). Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity. CUP,
Cambridge, England.
Ho, Harvey Hsin-chang. (2008). The polysemy of PO in Mandarin Chinese. The
proceedings of ROCLING XX: Conference on Computational Linguistics
and Speech Processing, 244-258.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
203
Horie, Kaoru. (1993). A Cross-linguistic study of Perception and Cognition Verb
Complements: A Cognitive Perspective. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
University of Southern California.
Horno Cheliz, Maria del Carmen. (2002). Aspecto lexico y verbos de percpcion: a
proposito de ver y mirar. In Rosa Maria Castaner (ed.), memoriam Manuel
Alvar. Archivo de Filologia Aragonesa 59-60: 555-76.
Hoshi, Michiyo and Tsering, Tondup. (1978). Zanskar Vocabulary: A Tibetan
dialect spoken in Kashmir. Institute for the study of languages and cultures
of Asia and Africa.
Howes, M.M. (1990). The Psychology of human Cognition. New York: Pergamon.
Hudson, Richard. (1995). Word Meaning. London: Routledge, II New Fetter Lane.
Hurford, James R. & Heasley, Brendan. (1983). Semantics: a course book.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide and L. Serratrice. (1999). Ms. Making Sense of ‘Over’:
A Study in Acquisition. Department of Linguistics. University of
Edinburgh.
Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1997). Smelling and perception: A cross-linguistic
study. In A. Barcelona (ed.) Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa 6.2: 113-21.
Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1999). Polysemy and Metaphor in Perception Verbs:
A Cross-linguistic Study. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Edinburgh.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
204
Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1999a). Semantic extensions in the sense of smell.
International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology. Anuario de
Seminaria de Filologia Vasca Julio de Urquijo (In press).
Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1999b). Metaphorical mappings in the sense of smell.
In R. W. Gibbs Jr. and G. Steen (eds.) Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 29-45.
Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1999c). an inside look at tactile verbs. In F. J. Ruiz
de Mendoza, A. Barreras and S. Pena (eds.) Perspectivas aplicadas de la
organizacion del conocimiento y del procesamiento y uso del lenguaje.
Logrono: Universidad de Logrono (In press).
Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1999d). Predictable vs. Unpredictable Polysemy. In
S. J. Hwang and A. Lommel (eds.) LACUS Forum 25: 201-211.
Iwata, S. (1995). Invariance again: what is preserved in a metaphorical mapping?.
English Linguistics 12: 173-196.
Jackendoff, Ray. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. The Massachutt Institute of
Technology.
Johnson, C. (1999). Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: the
case of see. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Wilcox (eds.) Cultural,
Typological and Psychological Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
205
Johnson, Christopher. (1999). Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of
polysemy: The case of see. In Hiraga, Masako, Chris Sinha and Sherman
Wilcox (eds), Cultural, Psychological, and Typological Issues in
Cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Publishing Company.
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: the Bodily Basis of Meaning,
Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, M. (1992). Philosophical implications of cognitive semantics. In
cognitive linguistics 3.4: 345-366.
Katz, J.J. & Fodor, J.A. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39,
170-210.
Katz, Jerrold J. (1972). Semantic Theory. New York: Harper and Row.
Keller, Barbara. (1986). A Qualitative approach to the study of language and
identity in Ladakh.
Kempson, M. Ruth. (1977). Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Kilgarriff, A. (1992). Polysemy. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, CSRP 261,
School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences.
Kilgarriff, A. (1993). Dictionary Word Sense Distinctions: An enquiry into their
nature. Computers and the Humanities 26 (1-2): 365-387.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
206
Kilgarriff, A. (1995). Inheriting polysemy. In Computational Lexical Semantics
(P. Saint Dizier and E. Viegas, eds.), 319-335. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Kilgarriff, A. (1997). I don’t believe in word senses. Computers and the
Humanities 31: 91-113
Kilgarriff, A. (2004). How dominant is the commonest sense of a word? In Text,
Speech, Dialogue. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol. 3206.
Sojka, Kopecek and Pala, (eds.). Springer Verlag: 103-112.
Kilgarriff, A., G. Gazdar. (1995). Polysemous relations. In Grammar and
Meaning: Essays in Honor of Sir John Lyons (F. Palmer, ed.) 1-25.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knowles, Murray & Moon, Rosamund. (2006). Introducing Metaphor. Oxon:
Routledge.
Konchok Phanday. (2007). Comment on Thonmi’s Grammar. Cultural
Preservation & Promotion Society, Achinathang, Leh (Ladakh).
Koshal, Sanyukta. (1976). Ladakhi Phonetic Reader. Publication Unit, Central
Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore.
Koshal, Sanyukta. (1979). Ladakhi Grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas.
Koshal, Sanyukta. (1982). Conversational Ladakhi. Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass.
Koshal, Sanyukta. (2006). Guide to learn Ladakhi language: a phrase book for
learning Ladakhi language. Hanish & Co., Delhi.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
207
Kovecses, Zoltan, and Szabo, Peter. (19986). Metaphors of anger, pride, and love:
A lexical approach to the study of concepts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kravchenko, Alexander. (2005). Cognitive linguistics, biology of cognition and
biosemiotics: Bridging the gaps. In Language Sciences 28 (2006). Elsevier
Ltd, 51-75.
Krifka, Manfred. (1998). Polysemy in LIN393S Lexical Semantics.
Kurath, H. (1921). The Sematnic Sources of the Words from the Emotions in
Sanskrit, Greek, Latin and the Germanic Languages. Menasha (Wi):
George Banta Publishing Co.
Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide
to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. The
embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic
Books.
Lakoff, George, Johnson, Mark. (1980). Metaphor we live by. Chicago: The
University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories
Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, George. (1988). Cognitive Semantics. In Eco, U., M. Santambrogio and P.
Violi (eds) Meaning and Mental Representations. Blooington: Indiana
University Press, 119-54.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
208
Lakoff, George. (1992). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor (2nd
edition).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony
(ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Landau, B. and L.R. Gleitman. (1985). Language and Experience. Cambridge,
Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I:
Theoretical prerequisites. Standford: Standford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2:
Descriptive application. Standfor: Standford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (2002). Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis
of Grammar 2nd
edition. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leder, Drew. (1990). The Absent Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, Keedong. (1996). Getting at the meaning of make. . In Rene Dirven, Ronald
W. Langacker and John R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in the
Redwoods, The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics. New York:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Leech, G. (1981). Semantics: the Study of Meaning. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 2nd
edition.
Leech, Geoffrey. (1974). Semantics. CUP, Cambridge, England.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
209
Lehrer, A. (1990). Polysemy conventionality, and the structure of the lexicon.
Cognitive Linguistics I.2: 207-246.
Lehrman, Alexander. (2005). Meaning as grammar. In Language Sciences 28
(2006). Elsevier Ltd, 497-507.
Lepore, E., Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). What is Cognitive Science? Blackwell, Oxford.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. (2007). Polysemy, Prototypes, and Radial
Categories. In Geeraerts, Dirk & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), The Oxford
Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewandowski, Wojciech. (2007). Toward a comparative analysis of COMING
and GOING verbs in Spanish, German, and Polish. Master degree
Dissertation, Univeritat Autonoma de Barcelona.
Litchenberk, F. (1991). Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization.
Language 67.3: 474-509.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (2 vols.). London & New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Lyons, J. (1981). Language and Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge
University Press.
Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistics Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge, England;
New York: Cambridge University Press.
MacLaury, Robert E. (1991). Prototypes revisited. Annual Review of
Anthropology, Vol.20, p.55.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
210
MacWhinney, B. (1989). Competition and lexical categorization. In Corrigan, R.,
Eckman, F., & Noonan, M. (Eds.), Linguistic Categorization, 195-241.
John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Mark Turner and Gilles Fauconnier. (2003). Metaphor, Metonymy, and binding.
In Barcelona, Antonio (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads.
Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Marobela, Refilwe Mmaseroka. (2006). Polysemy of the verbs YA ‘go’ and TLA
‘come’ in Northern Sotho. Master degree Dissertation, University of
Stellenbosch.
Michaelis, Laura. (1996). Cross-world continuity and the polysemy of adverbial
still. In Fauconnier, Gilles, Sweetser, Eve (eds.), Spaces, worlds, and
grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 179-226.
Miller, G.A. and P.N. Johnson-Laird. (1976). Language and Perception.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Miller, George A. & Philip N. Johnson-Laird. (1977). Language and perception.
Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Miller, George. (1990). Wordnet: An on-line lexical database. International
Journal of Lexicography (special issue), 3(4):235-312.
Miller, I.J.Jr. and Bartoshuck, L.M. (1991). Taste perception, taste bud
distribution, and spatial relationships. In T.V. Getschell, R.L. Doty, >.M.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
211
Bartoshuck, and J.B. Snow, Jr. (eds.), Smell and Taste in Health and
Disease. New York: Raven Pres, 175-204.
Miller, I.J.Jr. and F.E. Reedy. (1990). Variations in human taste bud density and
tste intensity perception. Physiology and Perception 47: 1213-1219.
Mishra, Rajnish Kumar. (1965). Buddhist Theory of Meaning and Literary
Analysis. D.K. Printworld (P) Ltd, New Delhi.
Moiseeva, N. (1998). Verbs of perception in Russian. In M. Giger, T. Menzel and
B. Wiemer (eds.), Lexicologie und Sprachveranderung in der Slavia.
Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia 2. Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und
Informationssystem der Universitat Oldenburg, 153-164.
Nakazawada, Tsuneko. (1990). Pragmatic account of the distribution of come and
go in English, Japanese and Korean. In H. Hoji (ed.), Japanese/Korean
Linguistics, vol. 1, 97-110. Standford: CSLI Publications.
Nakazawada, Tsuneko. (2005). On come and go in English, Japanese, and
Chinese: Why do they come while others go? In Language, Information,
Text, vol. 12, 43-62. Tokyo: University of Tokyo.
Nakazawada, Tsuneko. (2006). Motion Event Deictic Motion Verbs as path-
conflating verbs. In Muller, S. (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG06
Conference. Standford: CSLI Publications.
Nemeth, Eniko, T., Bibok, Karoly. (2001). Pragmatics and the flexibility of word
meaning. Elsevier.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
212
Nerlich, B. and Clarke, D.D. (1997). Polysemy. Patterns of meaning and patterns
of history. Historiographia Linguistica XXIV.3: 349-385.
Nerlich, Brigitte and Clarke, D. David. (2001). ‘Ambiguities we live by: towards
a pragmatic of polysemy’, Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1-20, School of
Psychology, University of Nottingham, University park, Nottingham, NG7
2 RD, UK.
Nerlich, Brigitte, David D. Clarke, and Zazie Todd. (1999). “Mummy, I like
being a sandwich”: Metonymy in Language Acquisition. In Panther,
Klaus-Uwe and Gunter Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and
Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Nerlich, Brigitte. (2003). Polysemy: past and present. In Brigitte Nerlich, Zazie
Todd, Vimala Herman, David D. Clarke (eds.), Trends in Linguistics,
Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language. Mouton de
Gruyter.
Niemeier, Susanne. (2003). Straight from the Heart-Metonymic and metaphoric
explorations. In Barcelona, Antonio (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the
Crossroads. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Norberg-Hodge, Helena & Thupstan Paldan. (1991). Ladakhi English Dictionary.
The Ladakh Ecological Development Group and the Ladakh Project, Leh,
Ladakh.
Norman, Rebecca (unpublished). Ladakhi-English Dictionary.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
213
Norman, Rebecca. (1994). Getting Started in Ladakhi: A phrase book for learning
Ladakhi. Melong Publication, Leh, Ladakh.
Nunberg, G. (1979). The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions. Polysemy,
Linguistics and Philosophy 3: 143-184.
Nunberg, G. (1996). Transfers of meaning. In Lexical Semantics: The problem of
polysemy (J. Pustejovsky and B. Boguraev, eds.), 109-132. Clarendon
Press, Oxford.
Nunberg, G., Zaenen, A. (1991). Systematic polysemy in lexicology and
lexicography. In Euralex 92 proceedings. Part II (H. Tommola, K.
Varantola, T. Salmi-Tolonen, and J. Schopp, eds.), 387-396. Tampere.
Oe, Saburo. (1975). Nichieigo no hikakukenkyuu: syukansei o megutte (A
comparative study of Japanese and English: on subjectivity). Tokyo:
Nanundo.
OKUNO, Tadanori. (1993). An Integrated Theory of Coming and Going. Bull.
Fac. Educ. Hirosaki University 70: 11-20.
Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, Jonathan Crowther (ed.). (1996). Oxford
University Press.
Palmer, F.R. (1966). A Linguistic Study of the English Verb. London: Longman.
Palmer, F.R. (1976). Semantics. CUP, Cambridge, England.
Palmer, F.R. (1981). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Panman, O. (1982). Homonymy and polysemy. Lingua, 58: 105-136.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
214
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda L. (2007). Metonymy. In Geeraerts,
Dirk & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Gunter Radden (eds.). (1999). Metonymy in Language
and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing
Company.
Papafragou, A. (1996). On metonymy. Lingua 99.4: 169-195.
Peeters, Bert (Ed.). (2006). Semantic primes and universal grammar. John
Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Petho, Gergely. (2001). What is Polysemy?—A Survey of Current Research and
Results. In Eniko Nemeth T. and Karoly Bibok (eds.), Pragmatics and the
Flexibility of word meaning. Elsevier.
Petruck, Miriam. (1986). Body part terminology in Hebrew: A study in lexical
semantics. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
Poutsma, H. (1926). A Grammar of Late Modern English. Part II: The Parts of
Speech. Section II. Groningen: P. Nordhoff.
Prevot, A. (1935). Verbes grecs relatifs a la vision et noms de l’oeil. RPh 9: 133-
60.
Pustejovsky, J. (1989). Current issues in computational lexical semantics. In ACL
Proceedings, 4th
European Conference, xvii-xxiii Manchester.
Pustejovsky, James. (1995). The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
215
Quine, W.V. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, Mass; MIT press.
Radden, Gunter and Zoltan Kovecses. (1999). Towards a Theory of Metonymy.
In Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Gunter Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language
and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing
Company.
Radden, Gunter. (1996). Motion metaphorized: The case of coming and going. In
Rene Dirven, Ronald W. Langacker and John R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive
Linguistics in the Redwoods, The Expansion of a New Paradigm in
Linguistics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Radden, Gunter. (2003). How metonymic are metaphors? In In Barcelona,
Antonio (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin, New
York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. (2004). There and back: the case of Russian ‘go’. The
Slavic and East European Language Resource Center.
Raukko, Jarno. (1999). An “intersubjective” method for Cognitive-semantic
research on polysemy: the case of get. In Hiraga, Masako, Chris Sinha and
Sherman Wilcox (ed.), Cultural, Psychological, and Typological Issues in
Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Publishing Company.
Ravin, Y. (1990). Lexical semantics without Thematic Roles. Oxford: OUP
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
216
Ravin, Yael and Leacock, Claudia (eds.). (2000). Polysemy-Theoretical and
Computational Approaches. London: OUP
Riemer, Nick. (2005). The Semantics of polysemy: Reading meaning in English
and Warlpiri. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
Robins, R.H. (1987). Polysemy and the lexicographer. In Burchfield, R.W. (Ed.),
Studies in Lexicography, 52-75. OUP, Oxford.
Roegiest, Eugeen. (2003). Argument Structure of Perception Verbs and Actance
Variation of the Spanish Direct Object. In G. Fiorentino (ed.), Romance
Objects. Transitivity in Romance Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,
299-322.
Rogers, A. (1971). Three kinds of physical perception verbs. Chicago Linguistics
Society 7: 206-223.
Rogers, A. (1972). Another look at flip perception verbs. Chicago Linguistics
Society 8: 303-316.
Rogers, A. (1973). Physical Perception Verbs in English: A Study in Lexical
Relatedness. PhD Dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
Rojo, Ana and Javier Valenzuela. (2004-2005). Verbs of Sensory Perception: An
English-Spanish Comparison. Languages in Constrast 5.2: 219-43.
Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B.B. (Eds.). (1978). Cognition and Categorization. Lawrence
Erlbaum, New Jersey.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
217
Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories.
In T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and Acquisition of Language.
New York: Academy Press.
Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (ed.), Advances in Cross-
Cultural Psychology. London: Academy Press.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds),
Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal
structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7: 573-605.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. In Annual
Review of Psychology, 32: 89-115.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., Boyes-Braem, P. (1976).
Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive psychology 8, 382-439.
Rosch, Eleanor. (1975). Cognitive representations for semantic categories. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General 104, 192-233.
Ruhl, Charles. (1989). On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics. State
University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, Francisco Jose. (2007). High-level metaphor and
metonymy in meaning construction. In Radden, Gunter, Klaus-Michael
Kopke, Thomas Berg, and Peter Siemund (eds.), Aspects of Meaning
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
218
Construction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing
Company.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (1997). An interview with George Lakoff. In A. Barcelona
(ed.), Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa 6.2: 33-52.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Hutchinson, London.
Saint-Dizier, Patrick & Viegas, Evelyne. (1995). An introduction to lexical
semantics from a linguistic and a psycholinguistic perspective. In Saint-
Dizier, Patrick & Viegas, Evelyne (eds.), Studies in Natural Language
Processing: Computational Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Schiffman, S.S. and R.P. Erickson. (1980). The issue of primary tastes versus a
taste continuum. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 4: 109-117.
Schwanenflugel, P.J. (1991). Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? In P.J.
Schwanenflugel (ed.). The psychology of word meaning. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum, 223-250.
Schwarz, Ch., Schepping, M.-T. (1995). Polysemy in a two-level-semantics. In
Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language (U. Egli, P. Pause,
Ch. Schwarze, A. von Stechow, and G. Wienold, eds.), 283-300. John
Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Sekuler, R. and Blake, R. (1994). Perception. New York: McGraw-Hill.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
219
Sharma, D.D. (1996). Tribal Languages of Ladakh: part I and II. Delhi: Mittal
Publications Delhi-110035 (INDIA).
Shen, Ya-Ming. (1996). The semantics of the Chinese verb “come”. . In Rene
Dirven, Ronald W. Langacker and John R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive
Linguistics in the Redwoods, The Expansion of a New Paradigm in
Linguistics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wangchuk, Sonam. (1994 to 2006). Ladags Melong ‘Mirror of Ladakh’: A
bilingual magazine (25 issues). Melong Publication, Leh, Ladakh.
Spark Jones, K. (1986). Synonymy and semantic classification. Edinburgh
University Press, Edinburgh.
Sprig, R.K. (2002). Balti-English, English-Balti Dictionary. Routledge Curzon,
New York.
Stock, P.F. (1983). Polysemy. In Proc. Exeter Lexicography Conference, 131-
140.
Su, Lily I-wen and Hsiu-min Liu, Laura. (2001). Metaphorical Extension and
Lexical Meaning. Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Taiwan
University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Svorou, Soteria. (1993). The grammar of Space. Amsterdam and Philadelphia:
John Benjamins.
Sweetser, Eve. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics Metaphorical and cultural
aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
220
Talmy, L. (1975). Semantics and Syntax of motion. In Kimball, J.P. (ed.), Syntax
and Semantics 4, 181-238. New York: Academic Press.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms.
In Shopen, T. (ed.), Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Language
Typology and Syntactic Description III, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 57-149.
Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language cognition. Cognitive Science 12:
49-100.
Talmy, L. (2000). Typology and Process in concept structuring. Toward a
Cognitive Semantics, Vol.2. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.
Tashi, Konchok. (in press). English as medium of instruction in tribal areas
specifically in Leh Ladakh (J&K). In Indian Linguistics: 70: 425-428.
Tashi, Konchok. (2010). The polysemy of the deictic motion verb YONG ‘come’
in Ladakhi. In Interdisciplinary Journal of Linguistics (IJL) by
Department of Linguistics, University of Kashmir, Srinagar.
Taub, Sarah. (2001). Language from the body: iconicity and metaphor in
American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, John R. (1989). Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic
Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, John R. (1992). Old problems. Adjectives in Cognitive Grammar.
Cognitive Linguistics 3, 1-46.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
221
Taylor, John R. (1994). The two-level approach to polysemy. Linguistische
Berichte, 149: 3-26.
Taylor, John R. (1995). Linguistic Categorization: An essay in Cognitive
Linguistics. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Taylor, John R. (1999b). Approaches to word meaning: The network model
(Langacker) and the two-level model (Bierwisch) in comparison. In
Current Approaches to the Lexicon (R. Dirven and J. Vanparys, eds.), 3-
26. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Taylor, John R. (2002). Near synonyms as coextensive categories. ‘High’ and
‘tall’ revisited. Language Sciences, 25, 263-284.
Taylor, John R. (2003). Polysemy’s paradoxes. In Language Sciences 25 (2004).
Elsevier Ltd, 637-655.
Thepkanjana, Kingkarn & Uehara, Satoshi. (2007). The verb of giving in Thai and
Mandarin Chinese as a case of polysemy: A comparative study. In
Language Sciences.
Towell, G., and Voorhees, E.M. (1998). Disambiguating highly ambiguous words.
Computational Linguistics 24.1: 125-146.
Tuggy, D. (1993). Ambiguity, polysemy and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics 4.3:
273-290.
Tyler, Andrea, Evans, Vyvyan. (2001b). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy
networks: the case of over. Lanaguage 77: 724-765.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
222
Tyler, Andrea, Evans, Vyvyan. (2003). The Semantics of English prepositions:
spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Tyler, Andrea, Evans, Vyvyan. (2004). Applying cognitive linguistics to
pedagogical grammar: the case of over. In Achard, M., Niemeier, S. (Eds.),
Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language
teaching. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 257-280.
Ullmann, Stephen. (1972). Semantics: An introduction to the science of Meaning.
Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Ungerer, F. and H-J. Schmid. (1996). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics.
London: Longman. Essentials of Grammatical Theory: A Consensus View
of Syntax and Morphology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Vendler, Z. (1967). Philosophy and Linguistics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press.
Viberg, A. (1984). The verbs of perception: a typological study. In B. Butterworth,
B. Comrie and O. Dahl (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 123-162.
Vinge, L. (1975). The Five Senses: Studies in a Literary Tradition. Lund, Sweden:
Publications of the Royal Society of Letters at Lund.
Vlach, F. (1983). On situation semantics for perception. Synthese 54: 129-152.
Webster, Jeff. (1991). A survey of the Ladakhi Language.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
223
Weinreich, U. (1980). On semantics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1972). Semantic Primitives. Athenaum, Frankfurt.
Wierzbicka, A. (1987). Boys will be boys: ‘radical semantics’ vs. ‘radical
pragmatics’. Language, 63(1), 95-114.
Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics; Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures through their Keywords. Oxford
University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and
Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiggins, D. (1971). On sentence sense, word-sense and difference of word-sense.
Towards a philosophical theory of dictionaries. In Steinberg, D.D. &
Jakobitz, L.A. (Eds.), semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader. CUP,
Cambridge, England.
Wilkins, David P. and Dborah Hill. (1995). When GO means COME:
Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics
6(2): 209-259.
Willems, Klass. (2005). Logical polysemy and variable verb valency. In
Language Sciences 28 (2006). Elsevier Ltd, 580-603.
Williams, John N. (1992). Processing polysemous words in context: Evidence for
interrelated meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21:193-218.
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
224
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953). Philosophical Investigation. New York: Macmillan.
Wolfe, J.H. (1988). Readings from the Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Sensory
Systems II: Senses Other than Vision. Boston, Basel: Birkhauser.
Yu, Ning. (1995). Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English
and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10, 59-92.
Yu, Ning. (1998). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from
Chinese. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Yu, Ning. (1999). Spatial Conceptualization of time in Chinese. In Hiraga,
Masako K., Sinha, Chris, Wilcox, Sherman (eds.), Cultural, Psychological
and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins,
Amsterdam, 69-84.
Yu, Ning. (2000). Figurative uses of finger and palm in Chinese and English.
Metaphor and Symbol 15, 159-175.
Yu, Ning. (2001a). What does our face mean to us? Pragmatics and Cognition 9,
1-36.
Yu, Ning. (2001b). Chinese metaphors of thinking. Paper presented at the 7th
International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 23-27 July, Santa Barbara,
CA. [revised version to appear in Palmer, Gary B., Goddard, Cliff, Lee,
Penny (eds), the special issue on “Talking about Thinking across
Languages”, Cognitive Linguistics14].
@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography
225
Yu, Ning. (2002). Body and emotion: body parts in Chinese expression of
emotion. In Enfield, N.J., Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.), (special issue) The
Body in Description of Emotion: Cross-linguistic Studies. Pragmatics and
Cognition 10, 341-367.
Yu, Ning. (2003a). Metaphor, body, and culture: the Chinese understanding of
gallbladder and courage. Metaphor and Symbol 18, 13-31.
Yu, Ning. (2003b). Synesthetic metaphor: a cognitive perspective. Journal of
Literary Semantics 32, 19-34.
Yu, Ning. (2003c). The bodily dimension of meaning in Chinese: what do we do
and mean with “hands”? In Casad, Eugene H., Palmer, Gary B. (eds.),
Cognitive Linguistics and Non-Indo-European Languages. Mouton de
Gruyter, Berlin, 337-362.
Yu, Ning. (2004). The eyes for sight and mind. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 663-686
Yu-Fang Wang, Flora. A cognitive Account of the Lexical Polysemy of Chinese
Kai ‘open’. Graduate Institute of English, National Taiwan Normal
University.
Zgusta, L. (1971). Manual of lexicography. Mouton, The Hague.
Ziff, Paul. (1960). Semantic Analysis. Cornell: University Press.
Zwicky, Arnold M. and J.M. Sadock. (1995). Ambiguity tests and how to fail
them. Syntax and Semantics, 4:1-36.