Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

29
Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been

Transcript of Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

Page 1: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

Beyond Sensor Technologies

Where Do We Go ?

What’s Next ?

Where Others Have Been

Page 2: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Real-time Active Sensor History

Ferte and Balp 1937

Optical Weeder

Page 3: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Real-time Active Sensor History

Marihart 1943

Variable rate nutrient, fungicide and herbicide

Page 4: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Real-time Active Sensor History

Palmer and Owens 1969

Chemcial weeder first to use digital computer

Page 5: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Real-time Active Sensor History

Henderson and Grafton 1975

First solid-state (LED) plant sensor

Page 6: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Real-time Active Sensor History

Stafford et al. 1988

Handheld turf sensor

Page 7: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Real-time Active Sensor History

Beck and Vyse 1992

Solid state weeder

Page 8: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Prof. Robert Olson Warned about Nitrate Leaching

Graduate Students : Curt Clausen, Bill Raun, Albert Simms

Producers had “discovered” the merits of N fertilizer

on corn yields and “assumed” that:

If a little is good, more would be better !

Page 9: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

High – Nitrate Groundwater in Nebraska

Deep soil cores showed nitrate leaching toward

groundwater.

Causes : Too much N fertilizer and water

Producers said - “If you want us to apply less N fertilizer, you will have to come up with a practical way to detect a pending deficiency and fix it before it reduces yield ! ! !

> 10 mg/L NO3-N

Page 10: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Hageman Enlightenment Regarding C & N

Schepers takes sabbatical leave with Dick Hageman

and works with Fred Below to explore ways to

monitor corn N status.

Leaf chlorophyll is key to high yields !

Page 11: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Concern over Nitrate and Pesticide Leaching

Burlington Northern Railroad funds project to

protect groundwater quality.

Nitrification inhibitor

Realistic N fertilizer rates and timing

Richard Ferguson

Raun Lohry (Nutra-Flo)

Developed leaf N vs. chlorophyll concentration relationships for corn at different growth stages

Page 12: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Problem – Variability in Yield Responses to N

Pioneer HiBred studies (Curt Clausen)

Schuyler, Page, ???? Nebraska

How to compare corn yield responses to N fertilizer

rates across years, hybrids, and locations ?

Used Relative Yield to evaluate N fertilizer effects across studies

Page 13: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

What portion of corn-yield variability should realistically be attributed to climatic conditions after silking ? Question

<5% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% >40%

?

Page 14: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

July 12, 2012August 11, 2012

Value of Irrigation

Page 15: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

Thermal IR image

Water Distribution Problems

Someplacein Kansas

2011

Page 16: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Minolta Introduces SPAD Meter

Project manager (Todd Peterson)

Graduate student (Tracy Blackmer)

SPAD meters used to make spoon-feeding decisions

for fertigation in MSEA studies

“Sufficiency Index” concept is published

Page 17: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Yiel

d, M

g/ha

Fertilizer N Rate, kg/ha

Canopy sensors can not quantify excess N

N Status

Similar

Page 18: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

’401930 ‘50 ‘70 2000‘60 ‘80 ‘90

Real-time Active Sensor History

Heege and Reusch 1995

First commercial variable rate applicator

Page 19: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

Early N

Planting

In-season N

V6 V9 Tasseling

When?How much?

How much early?In season?

Sensor based

N uptake

Page 20: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

EarlyGrowth

RapidGrowth Maturing

LateLoss

100

75

50

25

0May June July Aug Sept

Seas

onal

Nitr

ogen

Upt

ake,

%

70-80% of requirement after V8 - 10

40% of requirement after silking

Building Block

Page 21: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

Relative Dry Matter vs N Uptake

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Relative Dry Matter

Re

lati

ve

N U

pta

ke

GH2572

H2715

P3162

P3379

P3417

B17xMO17

Irrigated Corn - 1993

Silking

Page 22: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

0 50 100 150 200 2500

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

N Rate (kg N/ha)

NU

E (

%)

0 50 100 150 200 2500

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

N Rate (kg N/ha)

Yiel

d (M

g/ha

)Corn Yield NUE

All Yield

FertilizerOnly Yield

EONR = 176 kg/haEconomic Optimum N Rate

FREE yield

“Nitrogen Use Efficiency”

Fertilizer Effect

Total N Effect

Page 23: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

Pay More Attention to Cultural Practices ?Corn is the Wrong Crop ?

Data Interpretation ?Algorithm Development ?Product Quality Issues ?

Page 24: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

Seed Corn - 2012

Male

Female

Page 25: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

RapidSCAN

V8

Do high yielding hybrids have the same nutrient uptake patterns as older hybrids ?

….similar nutrient balance ?

Page 26: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

0 20 40 60 80 100

Dry matterNPK

ZnS

MgCaMnCl

Cu

Percent of Total Uptake at Silking

Silking

Page 27: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

0 20 40 60 80 100

Dry matterNPK

ZnS

MgCaMnClCu

% Total Uptake Removed in Grain

Harvest

Page 28: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

Forget about -building a better mouse trap ?

RatherStart by working with farmers to -

catch 50 – 75% of the mice with existing technologies ?

Drive and Fly Safely

Page 29: Beyond Sensor Technologies Where Do We Go ? What’s Next ? Where Others Have Been.

Jim Schepers

402-310-6150

[email protected]