BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? %...
-
Upload
lucas-sherin -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? %...
![Page 1: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIPNJASK 3-8 RESULTS
2010-2011
![Page 2: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
How are we doing compared to the standard?
% Partially Proficient
% Proficient
% Advanced Proficient
![Page 3: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
How are we compared to the District Factor Group?
Relative Performance
![Page 4: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
GRADE 3NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 12.8% 66.1% 21.1%
Bethlehem Twp.
6.9% 55.2% 37.9%
![Page 5: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
GRADE 3NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 54.2% 36.7% 9.1%
Bethlehem Twp.
43.1% 44.8% 12.1%
![Page 6: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
GRADE 4NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 13.6% 66.4% 20.0%
Bethlehem Twp.
15.7% 65.7% 18.6%
![Page 7: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
GRADE 4NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 46.4% 44.3% 9.3%
Bethlehem Twp.
62.9% 25.7% 11.4%
![Page 8: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
GRADE 4NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
SCIENCE
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 64.9% 32.0% 3.1%
Bethlehem Twp.
81.4% 18.6% 0%
![Page 9: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
GRADE 5NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 12.3% 67.9% 19.8%
Bethlehem Twp.
15.0% 57.5% 27.5%
![Page 10: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
GRADE 5NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 56.8% 35.1% 8.1%
Bethlehem Twp.
46.3% 36.3% 17.5%
![Page 11: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
GRADE 6NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 13.4% 69.2% 17.5%
Bethlehem Twp.
18.2% 70.5% 11.4%
![Page 12: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
GRADE 6NJ ASK - SPRING 2010
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 41.9% 47.9% 10.2%
Bethlehem Twp.
52.3% 40.9% 6.8%
![Page 13: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
GRADE 7NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 22.7% 59.6% 17.7%
Bethlehem Twp.
25.7% 58.1% 16.2%
![Page 14: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
GRADE 7NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 38.9% 43.7% 17.4%
Bethlehem Twp.
33.8% 45.9% 20.3%
![Page 15: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
GRADE 8NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 34.1% 59.7% 6.2%
Bethlehem Twp.
41.4% 55.7% 2.9%
![Page 16: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
GRADE 8NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 46.9% 39.5% 13.7%
Bethlehem Twp.
71.4% 20.0% 8.6%
![Page 17: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
GRADE 8NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
SCIENCE
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 46.8% 46.6% 6.6%
Bethlehem Twp.
58.6% 38.6% 2.9%
![Page 18: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Data Analysis
What trends do you find in the data?
Cohort Analysis: Follow the same group of students from Grade 3-8
![Page 19: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
3-8 Cohort Analysis: Language Arts
![Page 20: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
3-8 Cohort Analysis: Mathematics
![Page 21: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
How are we doing compared to ourselves?
Progress
Non-Cohort Analysis: Different groups of students in a specific grade over time
![Page 22: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 3 Lang. Arts
![Page 23: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 3 Mathematics
![Page 24: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 4 Lang. Arts
![Page 25: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 4 Mathematics
![Page 26: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 4 Science!
![Page 27: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 5 Lang. Arts
![Page 28: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
7.94
50.962.7
41.2
33.3
6.8
14.8
50.3
54.2
42.9
31
18.3
11.2
47.9
46.6
33.8
42.2
10
17.3
40.8
53.4
49.2
29.3
8.911.4
37.5
52.2
53.6
36.4
8.1
17.5
35.1
36.2
56.8
46.3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT
% S
tud
en
ts
DFG I and BT Comparison Non-Cohort Data Gr. 5 Math
2006 2007 2008* 2009 2010**
*ScoringChange
Adv. Prof.
Part. Prof.
Proficient
2011
**Stayed at Conley
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 5 Mathematics
![Page 29: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 6 Lang. Arts
![Page 30: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 6 Mathematics
![Page 31: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 7 Lang. Arts
![Page 32: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 7 Lang. Arts
![Page 33: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 8 Lang. Arts
![Page 34: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 8 Mathematics
![Page 35: BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551b89c3550346167e8b4ed2/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 8 Science