Beth Drewniak
description
Transcript of Beth Drewniak
Soil organic carbon response to harvested crops: a comparison between biogeochemistry model versionsBeth Drewniak
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
2
Background/Motivation
CLM4.5 – harvest puts grain into litter pools
Microbes = Happy Farmers = Sad But, removing grain has a big impact
on the carbon cycle
http://www.sipcamadvanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/corn_harvest.jpg
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
3
First: Calculate Yields
Calculate grain yield (adapted from Agro-IBIS):
Yield = grainc * fyield * convfact / cgrain
grainc = grain carbon (g/m2) fyield = adjustment factor for portion of grain that is actually harvested convfact = conversion to get from g/m2 to bu/acre cgrain = amount of carbon in grain (0.45)
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
4
Harvesting Grain
Grain carbon and nitrogen pushed into product pool
Decays over 1-yr Can be coupled to atmosphere as
respiration Option to put leaves and stems into
product pool, currently not used
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
5
Yields when crops are harvested
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
6
PTCLM: Bondville, ILAmeriflux site
BGC vs. CN
Photo Courtesy of David Cook
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
7
Gross Primary Productivity at Bondville, ILunder a corn-soybean rotation
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
8
Net Ecosystem Exchange at Bondville, IL
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
9
Corn at Bondville, IL
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
10
Soybean at Bondville, IL
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
11
What about Soil Carbon?…and other crazy plots
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
12
At Bondville, IL
Year
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
13
Crazy corn yields – increasing, and huge variabilityOther crops are OK
Year
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
14
A global perspective
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
15
Conclusions
Harvest does have an effect on plant productivity BGC works great for corn, CN works better for soybean Harvest results in a decrease in SOC for CN, but not for BGC
– Increases in SOC result in increasing yield Model needs to be properly spun up with crops
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
16
Future Directions
CSI (Corn Scenario Investigation) to resolve the corn yield– Run with other atmospheric forcing data?
Calibrate parameters – in progress for soybean Start testing residue harvest Incorporate other management practices
CLM Working Group Meeting, February 24-27, 2014
17
Thanks
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research, U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract DE-AC02-06CH11357.
Numerical simulations were performed with resources provided by “Fusion,” a 320-node computing cluster operated by the Laboratory Computing Resource Center at Argonne National Laboratory and the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, supported by the Office of Science and US Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.