NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 1 of 14

SILENCE IS ACQUIESENCE, AGREEMENT AND DISHONOUR

Equity will not allow a statute to be used as a cloak for fraudQUI JURE SUO UTITUR, NEMINI FACIT INJURIAM. He who uses his legal rights harms noone. Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition

I, Marc Anton Paul Horn, Sui juris,, juris et de jure within my authority and jurisdiction Jure Divino, nunc pro tunc ,hereby give the Respondants notice as detailed within this NOTICE OF LIABILITY - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Pages 1 of 14 to 14 of 14, including the attested statements of fact on this 7th day of February 2017Hereinafter: Claimant, 1. I have exhausted all reasonable means to settle this matter and reluctantly peruse this formal remedy procedure.2. It is not my intention to harass, intimidate, offend, conspire, blackmail, coerce, or cause anxiety, alarm or distress. 3. This notice is presented with honourable and peaceful intentions, 4. It is expressly for your benefit to provide you with due process and a good faith opportunity to state a verified rebuttal of my claim in order to reach an equitable resolution to the harm caused in regards your failure to perform your fiduciary duties as trustees and, thereby causing me harm by denying me my right to enjoy the benefits of my grant.The Claimants Authority in this matter.QUI NON IMPROBAT, APPROBAT. He who does not blame, approves. Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

1. The Claimant has authority as derived and established in the " Statement of Facts; Macrocosm - Natural Authority, Rights and Law".2. The Claimant entered an Agreement of Sale defining the duties and responsibilities with the Respondents on the 23 June 2014 as the Grantor and Beneficiary of the trust, with the Respondents as the Trustee, thereby establishing the Three Certainty Principles of Trusts (Knight v Knight (1840) 49 ER 58)

(1) Certainty of intention: The Agreement for Sale dated 24 June 2014.(2) Certainty of subject matter: Within the Agreement for Sale; Contract Particulars including Schedules 1 The Lease, Schedule 2: The Management Agreement, Schedule 3 The Sellers Legal Charge, Schedule 4: The Works, Schedule 5: The Secured Deposit Deed, Schedule 6: VAT From 70B(3) Certainty of objects: Within the Agreement for Sale; Contract Particulars including Schedules 1 The Lease, Schedule 2: The Management Agreement, Schedule 3 The Sellers Legal Charge, Schedule 4: The Works, Schedule 5: The Secured Deposit Deed, Schedule 6: VAT From 70B

I hereby issue this notice to:Notice to agent is Notice to principal, Notice to principal is Notice to agent.

1. It is your personal responsibility to notify all humans within the persons you are agents of as this may affect these fellow humans either directly or indirectly.2. Not doing so could put you as Trustees of this notice into breach of trust, and expose you to further liability should principals or agents within the persons you are an agent of to be harmed and you thereby are knowingly causing harm.

A man's word is his bond - A Trust Agreement!PERSON: Term may include artificial beings, as corporations, quasi-corporations, territorial corporations, and foreign corporations,BOND. An instrument which is not necessarily under seal..BONDSMAN. A surety; one who has entered into a bond as surety. TrusteeBlack's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

Whoever creates the liability must create the remedy

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 2 of 14

MICHAEL GUBBAY 1 of 13 to try settle one on one

Noon 7 February try to settle with all 13 Hereinafter: "Respondent # " or "Respondents #, #, etc." with the # referring the Respondent number to whom this notice is issued listed Respondent 1 to Respondent 11 above.

YOUR LIABILITY IN THIS MATTER.Your failure to perform your fiduciary duties as trustees of my Agreement of Sale as detailed in the enclosed "Statement of Facts - Microcosm - Trustees Breaches of Trust" and as the humans as detailed in the enclosed " Statement of Facts - Macrocosm - Natural Authority, Rights and Law".

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 3 of 14

FULL DISCLOSURE - Terms and Conditions1. NOTICE LANGUAGE. Unless defined herein, English as understood by a human who speaks reasonable English at UK school completion level.

2. GOVERNING LAW.1. All parties entered the Agreement for Sale by their freewill right to interact with other living humans, Jure Divino,2. This established the sub-jurisdictions with authority and responsibility as laid out within The Agreement for Sale dated 24 June 2014.3. Jure Divino take precedence in conflicts of interpretation within the Agreement for Sale and any Acts (Statute Law).

3. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. Any errors and omissions, and statements of fact, including but not limited to spellings and grammar, are by honest mistake oft based on my best understanding. Please include a list if any are found with your response within the requested method of response and timeframe detailed next in 4.

4. YOUR REMEDY TO MY CLAIM IS WE ESTABLISH THE FACTS - Methods of Response.

Failure to respond by attested affidavits is by default deemed failure to respond.

1. Responses are required, referenced point by point using the provided numbers in this Notice within 7 days commencing on the Certificate of Posting Guaranteed Next Day Delivery as follows;2. You must post your responses in the comments section under the appropriate page referenced point by point heading your response as follows - Respondent #, Page number, point reference number in the top line followed by your response, navigation links are found on this page by using this link. Password is 1233. ADDITIONALLY send a copy to fax +965 2457 255 .4. ADDITIONALLY send a copy by email to maphorn@yahoo.com as we live in 21st Century!.

5. IF YOU FAIL TO RESPOND THE FACTS CANNOT BE ESTABLISHED. 1. Failure to have respond within 7 days will result in a "Notice of Default - Opportunity to Cure Failure to Disclose Information ".2. If you again fail to respond within 3 days your inaction will result in a "Notice of Pre-Court Action, Opportunity to Cure Failure to Disclose Information and Notice of Lien".3. If you again fail to respond within 3 days your inaction will result in a "Notice of Default Judgement - Opportunity to Cure and Notice of Commencement of Civil Proceedings"

6. If you again fail to respond within 3 days a summary judgement will be applied for accordance with the Courts Procedure Rules , requiring and trust and equity judge, which you may appeal.

7. Remedy recovery procedures will commence through the legal system details of which you can find in Statement of Facts - Macrocosm - Natural Authority, Rights and Law. Page 5 of 5

Equity looks to the intent, and will regard substance rather than formJURIS IGNORANTIA EST CUM JUS NOSTRUM IGNORAMUS. It is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights. Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 4 of 14

REMEDY FOR HARM CAUSED

SUMMARY OF CLAIM - BACKGROUND1. As detailed in the Statement of Facts - Microcosm - Trustees Breaches of Trust there are numerous proven facts that prove severe breaches of the trust agreement in my Agreement of Sale.2. Of more concern are the breaches regarding the sale of the Freehold, where it appears there was an intent of malfeasance to defraud investors but until the facts are established a judgement cannot be reached. It all hinges around events on the 29 June 2016 where the Secure Deposit Deed was signed, the Charge against PSDL was lifted which secured the investors with the freehold title to compel PSDL undertakings, the freehold was sold to TL and GAM, the completion monies being deposited into the investors trust account held by PSBL and the underlease signed to PSDL from the new Freeholder TL!3. This is all unlawful as it is in breach of 10.11 requiring the Buyers approval to release the Charges at the Land Registry and with PSDL both against the freehold.4. The following day the property was removed from the PSDL charge in breach of the Charge which had a negative pledge based upon completion of the Agreement which technically is 5 years from practical completion, however it would be reasonable to accept the intent that from practical completion 10.11 the Secure Deposit Deed is sufficient.5. In under a month the bulk of the completion payment had been removed from the trust account and did not go to the development.6. After approximately 3 months the Freehold transfer was register by TL / GAM, containing a covenant in the Title Absolute that TL / GAM undertake to complete the Agreements covenanted by PSDL giving it a higher priority over all other charges!7. After approximately 5 months the Leasehold transfer was register by TL / GAM8. Nothing written was provided by TL beyond empty threat from Michael Gubbay that the investors who have not got their leaseholds must bear the cost by forfeiting the interest payments and assured rent.9. PSDL made some arrangement with USL when HB fell out of the picture and investors have seen none of this money.10. And the project is still not finished with no end in sight!I am not the only one affected. Hearsay via AHILL endless contractors and suppliers remain unpaid and hundreds of investors remain unpaid. This is not the way to do treat fellow humans!The following are detailed in the Statement of Facts - Microcosm - Trustees Breaches of Trust.4. £2,788,730.32 unaccounted for from the sale of the investors security being held in trust by PSDL.5. £739,198.68 withdrawn in breach of the SDD.Estimated as detailed in the Statement of Facts - Microcosm - Trustees Breaches of Trust.6. £1,200,000 Lost income due to investors estimate.This alone totals in excess of what was paid for the freehold by TL / GAM all of which should have gone into finishing PSDL undertakings.Accordingly I claim on behalf of all investors having an equal share the freehold title WYK463417, and the leasehold title YY78395 as this is the security that was intended for failure to perform! Worst case the investors can finish the work knowing they have a good investment from the final payments which is what you are after!In addition TL / GAM (either way you end up paying!) undertake to pay all dues to suppliers, subbies etc., and complete all outstanding works within 60 days from proof of delivery of this notice and walk away happy I am trying to settle this privately! This notice does form part of the process to do it publically. I cannot speak for the choices others may make for themselves.

The facts must be established to evaluate if this is unreasonable I request you all get together and come up with a better solution for me to evaluate!

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 5 of 14

NOTICE - HONOUR OR MALFEASANCEThe principal distinction between the terms "lawful" and "legal" is that the former contemplates the substance of law, the latter the form of law. To say of an act that it is "lawful" implies that it is authorized, sanctioned, or at any rate not forbidden, by law. To say that it is "legal" implies that it is done or performed in accordance with the forms and usages of law,Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

LEGAL: Public Law Between pieces of paper - persons - strawman- legal fictions

HONOR, n. In English law, a seigniory of several manors held under one baron or lord paramount. Also those dignities or privileges, degrees of nobility, knighthood, and other titles, which HONOR, v. To accept a bill of exchange, or to pay a note, check, or accepted bill, at maturity andaccording to its tenor.JUSTICE, n. In common law. The title given in England to the judges of the king's bench and thecommon pleas, and in America to the judges of the supreme court of the United States and of theappellate courts of many of the states. JUSTICE, v. In old English practice. To do justice, to see justice done; to summon one to do justice. Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

LAWFUL: Private LawBetween living humans - Honour, Equity and Trust

NATURAL LAW. This expression, "natural law," or jus naturale, was largely used in the philosophical speculations of the Roman jurists of the Antonine age, and was intended to denote a system of rules and principles for the guidance of human conduct which, independently of enacted law or of the systems peculiar to any one people, might be discovered by the rational intelligence of man, and would be found to grow out of and conform to his nature, meaning by that word his whole mental, moral, and physical constitution.HONESTUS. Lat. Of good character or standing. Coram duobus vel pluribus viris legalibus ethonestis, before two or more lawful and good men.EQUITY. In its broadest and most general signification, this term denotes the spirit and the habitof fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate the intercourse of men with men,

In a restricted sense, the word denotes equal and impartial justice as between two persons whose rights or claims are 'in conflict; justice, that is, as ascertained by natural reason or ethical insight, but independent of the formulated body of law. This is not a technical meaning of the term, except in so far as courts which administer equity seek to discover it by the agencies above mentioned, or apply it beyond the strict lines of positive law.

In a still more restricted sense, it is a system of jurisprudence, or branch of remedial justice, administered by certain tribunals, distinct from the common-law courts and empowered to decree "equity" in the sense last above given. Here it becomes a complex of well-settled and well understood rules, principles, and precedents. Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

MALFEASANCEMALFEASANCE. Evil doing; ill conduct; the commission of some act which is positively unlawful;the doing of an act which is wholly wrongful and unlawful; the doing of an act which personought not to do at all or the unjust performance of some act which the party had no right or whichhe had contracted not to do. Comprehensive term including any wrongful conduct that affects, interrupts or interferes with the performance of official duties.Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, affirmed / notarised at

Claimant: Signaturec/o 6 Mersey Road, Aigburth, Liverpool Witness : Signature

Witness : Signature

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 6 of 14

Statement of Facts - Macrocosm - Natural Authority, Rights and Law. Page 1 of 5

Equity looks to the intent, and will regard substance rather than formJURIS IGNORANTIA EST CUM JUS NOSTRUM IGNORAMUS. It is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights. QUI JURE SUO UTITUR, NEMINI FACIT INJURIAM. He who uses his legal rights harms noone.Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

On this day of February in the Year Two Thousand and Eighteen,I, Marc Anton Paul Horn, Sui juris,, juris et de jure as established by the facts and reasoned logic within this document until rebutted, within my authority and jurisdiction as established herein Jure Divino, nunc pro tunc, do solemnly affirm, declare and state as follows:1. I am competent to state the matters set forth herein.2. I have knowledge of the statements herein.3. All the facts herein are true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge, are well established principles in jure positive, and admissible as evidence, and if called upon as a witness I will testify to their veracity.

SUI JURIS. Lat. Of his own right; Having capacity to manage one's own affairs; not under legal disability to act for one's self.

JURIS. Lat. Of right; of law.JURIS ET DE JURE. Of law and of right. A presumption juris et de jure, or an irrebutable resumption, is one which the law will not suffer to be rebutted by any counter-evidence, but establishes as conclusive;.JURISDICTION.. It is the authority, capacity, power or right to act.JURE DIVINO. By divine right.NUNC PRO TUNC. Lat. Now for then. with a retroactive effect. "FACTO. In fact; by an act; by the act or fact. Ipso facto, by the act itself ; by the mere effect of a fact, without anything superadded, or any proceeding upon it to give it effect.

FACT. A thing done; an action performed or an incident transpiring; an event or circumstance; an actual occurrence. An actual happening in time or space or an event mental or physical.PROOF. The effect of evidence; the establishment of a fact by evidence. Any fact or circumstance which leads the mind to the affirmative or negative of any proposition.. The conviction or persuasion of the mind of a judge or jury, by the exhibition of evidence, of the reality of a fact alleged. JURIS POSITIVI. Of positive law; a regulation or requirement of positive law, as distinguishedfrom natural or divine law. Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

WHEREAS 1 (All creations have equal authority);JUS NATURALE. The natural law, or law of nature; law, or legal principles, supposed to be discoverable by the light of nature or abstract reasoning, in advance of organized governments or enacted laws. Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition. 1. No human has evidence that could be judged, even by using a simple majority as the definition of proof, let alone beyond a shadow of doubt, that their socially conditioned belief system "creator" is the highest authority on planet earth from where they derive more rights than another creation.

THEREFORE 1 (The limit of humans individual authority);AUTHORITY. Permission. Control over, jurisdiction. Often synonymous with powerSUPREMACY. The state of being supreme, or in the highest station of power; paramount authority; sovereignty; sovereign power.Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 7 of 14

Statement of Facts - Macrocosm - Natural Authority, Rights and Law. Page 2 of 5 1. All creations have equal authority over other creations, 2. No human has authority to take beyond what they need for survival, which is shelter from the environment, clean water and nutritious food, which is unreasoned and instinct.3. Each human is equally a highest supreme sovereign, and as equals when we interact with another human there can only be three self evident immutable truths,

1. No human has authority to knowingly cause another creation harm beyond their needs for survival.2. Each human has equal claim to the use and benefit derived from transformation of other creations.3. Each human has equal claim and use and benefit of information and knowledge left by generations past.

THEREFORE 2 (Natural Human Rights);JURE NATURE LEQUUM EST NEMINEM CUM ALTERIUS DETRIMENTO ET INJURIA FIERI LOCUPLETIOREM. By the law of nature it is not just that any one should be enriched by the detriment or injury of another. Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

Legal maxims:“No one is above the law.”, “Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of a few.”

1. All humans have the right to take what they need for survival, including taking from any other living human who has more than they need if other humans in a social system do not provide access to allow individuals to meet their needs for survival. 2. Each human has the right to an equal share of benefit derived from global resources transformed except for other living humans labour and ideas.3. Each human has the unhindered right to interact with another human.4. Each human has the right of self defence to ensure their personal survival and their protection of their lawful property.5. Each human has the right to use best available knowledge left from generations past.6. In unsettled disputes each human has the right to be judged by an independent jury.

WHEREAS 2 (Lawful access to meet human survival):Equity will not allow a statute to be used as a cloak for fraud

1. All the requirements for human survival are only found on land.THEREFORE 1 (Self evident laws for the needs of human survival):1. Any human can lawfully live where they can meet their needs for survival.2. Any human can take what they need for survival from those who have more than their need for their survival if they cannot have access to sufficient land to meet their needs of survival.THEREFORE 2 (Self evident laws beyond the needs of human survival):1. No one can own natural resources, we can only agree who has usage rights.2. The value of goods and services can only be the human input (mental and physical), which cannot be taken from any human without their freewill.

Legal Maxim: “It is against equity for freemen not to have the free disposal of their own property",3. Witnessing without preventing another human causing harm knowingly without risking one's own life is itself knowingly causing harm.

QUI NON IMPROBAT, APPROBAT. He who does not blame, approves. Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 8 of 14

Statement of Facts - Macrocosm - Natural Authority, Rights and Law. Page 3 of 5 WHEREAS 3 (Lawful human interaction can only be by consent);JURIS PRIECEPTA SUNT HIEC: HONESTE VIVERE; ALTERUM NON LEDERE; SUUM CUIQUE TRIBUERE. These are the precepts of the law: To live honourably; to hurt nobody; to render to everyone his dueBlack's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

1. Whenever one human imposes upon another human an interaction is started.2. By delegating authority an additional sub-jurisdiction below Jure Divino is established for the interaction. AUTHORITY. Permission. Control over, jurisdiction. Often synonymous with power. The power delegated by a principal to his agent. The lawful delegation of power by one person to another. Power of agent to affect legal relations of principal by acts done in accordance with principal'smanifestations of consent to agent.JURISDICTION.. It is the authority, capacity, power or right to act.Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

3. The limits of delegation of authority that can be made is the limit of each individuals authority.QUI NON HABET, ILLE NON DAT. He who has not, gives not. He who has nothing to give, givesnothing. A person cannot convey a right that is not in him. If a man grant that which is not his, the grant is void. Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

THEREFORE 1: (Consent to establish a new lawful sub-jurisdiction below Jure Divino);CONSENT. A concurrence of wills. Voluntarily yielding the will to the proposition of another;.... Consent is an act of reason, accompanied with deliberation, the mind weighing as in a balance the good or evil on each side...... It means voluntary agreement by a person in the possession and exercise of sufficient mentality to make an intelligent choice to do something proposed by another...Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

1. Laws of any form of social community are limited to the individual authority of the humans forming the social community and must uphold the Natural Human Rights previously derived.2. To manage the interaction so as not to knowingly cause another harm consent must be reached by affected humans including but not limited to,

1. What the interaction is,2. Ensuring all reasonable efforts have been used to include the best available knowledge,3. What is expected in exchange for allowing the proposed interaction,4. How the interaction can or will be ended.

3. Full terms and conditions must be understood by all affected humans.4. Full terms and conditions must be agreed by all affected humans.

THEREFORE 2: (Laws exceeding the authority of its members are unlawful and do not require adherence unless consensually contracted into that sub-jurisdiction)

1. No human can be held liable under a jurisdiction they have not consented into.2. No human can be held liable under a law of a jurisdiction they have consented into if it exceeds the authority of the consent.3. Any human enforcing a law not consented to is acting unlawfully, and is personally liable for harm caused by their actions.

THEREFORE 3: (Consent is ONLY the concurrence of the mind through reason)JURIS TANTUM. A presumption juris tantum is one which holds good in the absence of evidence to the contrary, but may be rebutted.Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

1. Any claim based on "implied", "derived" or "assumed" consent is not lawful.

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 9 of 14

Statement of Facts - Macrocosm - Natural Authority, Rights and Law. Page 4 of 5 WHEREAS 4: (Disputes - Claims - Authority to judge others - Settlement);1. Our best knowledge accumulated to date with the with the gnome project, all of humanity stems from the same source in line with many socially conditioned belief systems. The logical conclusion can be summarised as follows and gives time precedence for the evolution of law which is still true today. NATURAL, , TRUST, EQUITY (these make up the LAW OF THE LAND), COMMON, MERCHANT, MARITIME, INTERNATIONAL.

a. Family - parents actions resulted in fertilization. Creation then took over and children are born, "Natural Law" or "Laws of Creation". The Parents are the highest authority and the children are held in "Trust Law", until the offspring no longer consent. Those families that used reasoned logic to reach consensus for what was best for the family, "Equity Law" resulted in all being equal under the law is established in truth and fact Relationships where violence (mental or physical) is used to establish authority over others and is still practiced today, is the "Law of Conquest.", and is unlawful when it has no consent. We all have freewil and can choose to be someone else's slave!

b. As communities grew managing disputes after death of rights and usage of land and possessions (giver, ownership and use) as legacies (the whole "legal" system is about the ownership of property!) to your heirs (Grantor) , the root of "Trust Laws" which included defining who had rights to the land (asset ownership Trusty) and who had rights of usage (as more than one derived a life from the same land - Beneficiary)

c. With land available and as knowledge increased families grew in size and "clans", "tribes" etc. formed and tribal leaders were somehow elected and the concept of "village elders" kept knowledge flowing from generation to generation. How Tribal leaders were selected developed along might is right through to consensus, but retained the concept of separating passing on knowledge to advise the leader and intervene in disputes between the people and the leader. Land was plentiful so if disputes could not be settled by consensus migration of the weaker part of the tribe occurred moving onto "new pastures". Development of customs and traditions resulted in the concept of "Law of the land" and Common Law".

d. As knowledge increased surpluses to meet the individuals need of survival resulted and resulted in trade and the "Merchant Law" - one pillar.

e. With land becoming less available and populations growing, dispute settlement became more difficult as it is human nature to save for a rainy day the merchant law became dominant resulting in grass route movements which grew into dogmatic belief systems which evolved into "Ecclesiastic Law" to govern the churches operations ( and "Gods Law" to govern the slaves) - second pillar.

f. As ecclesiastic and merchant populations grew with no new "pastures green" to move to disputes occurred and they some used reason and merged without the knowledge or consent of the people (eg. The Roman Empire merging with the church to create the "Holy Roman Empire" and hence the "Divine Rights of Kings". Here the concept of modern "Trust Law" evolved following many of the same principles of the family unit adding the new concept of not having to tell a human if you set up a trust account for them when splitting ownership of usage rights and benefits of usage. Merging the pillars.

g. As knowledge increased boats allowed disgruntled local populations suppressed due to greed could find new "pastures green" and trade evolved between populations and resulted in the "Law of the Sea".

h. As new land was no longer available and disputes yet again occurred within the human family resulted in the establishment and growth of "International Law". Conquering the world.

i. With the control of wealth so extremely concentrated once again we can use our wisdom and knowledge to find a better way for humanity to coexist and hope we do not revolve back via the Law of Conquest to a new system, the Apple (materialism) on the tree of knowledge!

2. No human is perfect and we all make mistakes without ill intent based upon our knowledge at that time.3. Every human has a lawful duty to any social group they are part of to ensure they have satisfied themselves that any harm caused by another was done with intent.4. This can only be done by establishing the truth.5. As every human is equally the highest supreme sovereign, we can only judge ourselves and no other.

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 10 of 14

Statement of Facts - Macrocosm - Natural Authority, Rights and Law. Page 5 of 5

6. To make judgement of others as we cannot lawfully knowingly cause another harm, we must establish the truth. Truth is sovereign. Legal maxim: “To lie is to go against the mind.”7. To establish the truth we must exhaust all reasonable means available that we know harm caused to be with intent.8. This can only be done by laying a claim against the human who knowingly caused the harm.A matter must be expressed to be resolved Legal maxim: “He who fails to assert his rights has none.”9. This can only be done with what is true to you at that time by a witnessed statement including your damages claimed resulting from the harm to settle the matter. Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit.In accordance with UK Civil Court Procedure Rules Part 6 - Service of Documents, Rule 6.14 Deemed service, Rule 6.29 Certificate of service, Part 22 - Statements of Truth10. We must allow the human who caused the harm sufficient time to show their actions that caused you harm were without intent. A claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by Counter-affidavit point-for-point.In accordance with UK Civil Court Procedure Part 9 - Responding to Particulars of Claim - General, Part 16 - Statements of Case, Part 20 - Counterclaims and other Additional Claims11. Innocent until proven guilty. Legal maxim: “If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved.”.12. Resolution admission, payment or by jury. An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth and becomes the default judgment. Legal maxims: “He who does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it.”, “He who does not deny, admits.”In accordance with UK Civil Court Procedure Part 12 - Default Judgment13. As no human has authority to take more than they need for survival from another, leave that as a minimum so as to not to force them into violence to survive, allowing them the opportunity to learn from their mistakes; and

THEREFORE 1 (If matters cannot be settled privately call a court);1. If the matter cannot be settled privately between humans, the claimant must get a judgement from a court, either by providing the documentation described in WHEREAS4 for a summary judgement, or if contested from a jury made up of other members of the society to find a peaceful compromise.

In accordance with UK Civil Code Court Procedure make and application for a summary judgement and court order for implementation of the judgement Part 24 - Summary Judgment, Part 23 - General Rules about Applications for Court Orders,

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, affirmed / notarised at

Claimant/Affirmant: Signaturec/o 6 Mersey Road, Aigburth, Liverpool Witness #1: Signature

Contact details:

Witness #2: Signature

Contact details:

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 11 of 14

Statement of Fact - Microcosm - Trustees Breaches of Trust Page 1 of 4

On this day of February in the Year Two Thousand and Eighteen,I, Marc Anton Paul Horn, Sui juris,, juris et de jure as established by the facts and reasoned logic within this document until rebutted, within my authority and jurisdiction as established herein Jure Divino, nunc pro tunc, do solemnly affirm, declare and state as follows:1. I am competent to state the matters set forth herein.2. I have knowledge of the statements herein.3. All the facts herein are true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge, are well established principles in jure positive, and admissible as evidence, and if called upon as a witness I will testify to their veracity.

1. Intent of the Agreement of Sale

1. PSDL lead a group of persons to purchase land, construct 2 buildings. maintain and rent them out paying an assured rent for 5 years to the investors.2.This resulted in the offer as follows to make up this trust agreement, as is detailed in the Agreement of Sale where Grantor, Trustee and Beneficiary role are as follows.3. GRANTOR AND BENEFICIARY: To raise finance for this they presold the units to investors making the investors the grantor and beneficiary of the trust., and by PSDL providing Charges against the freehold until the leaseholds were completed, and then removing the charges and providing minimum financial guarantee as detailed in 10.11 in the Management Agreement.4. TRUSTEES: Buyers solicitors, PSDL managing PSBL, USL, PSD1 (AOS named construction contractor), and HB with duties and obligations as set out in the Agreement for Sale (hereinafter AOS).

2. Breaches of the Trust Agreement of Sale on Exchange of Contracts AOS 5.2.1

1. Buyers Solicitors Making payment without evidence of undertaking from the Seller solicitor to register the Charge (Schedule 3) (hereinafter LRC) against the Freehold Title WYK463417 (hereinafter FHT), and getting evidence that this was Charged after the Declaration of Trust dated 29 April 2014 was in place2. PSDL: 1. Failure to provide evidence of undertaking from the Seller solicitor to register the

LRC against the FHT, 2. Failure to provide evidence that this was actually Charged.- Established in fact from solicitor correspondence.3. The second Charge at Companies House (hereinafter PSDLC) was registered on 9 April 2014 as required.

3. Trustee relationship changes since the AOS

1. PSD1, the building contractor failed.

2. The sale of the FHT to TL and GAM1. A Secure Deposit Deed (hereinafter SDD) was made on the 29 June 2016, by David Roberts.- Established in fact from solicitor documents received.2. TL and GAM purchased the FHT on the 29 June 2016 for £3,717,920.00. (Registered on the 7 Nov 2016 app. 4 months after the purchase)- Established in fact from the Land Registry Title entries.3. On the same day the UNDERLEASE was signed. (Registered on the 7 February 2017, 3 months after the FHT)- Established in fact from the Land Registry Title entries.

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 12 of 14

Statement of Fact - Microcosm - Trustees Breaches of Trust Page 2 of 4

4. A deposit was made into the trust account as required by the SDD on the 29 June 2016, the same day from the TL solicitor being the completion funds of £ 929,198.68, having a balance above the minimum required £190.000 for Asquith House.This leaves £2,788,730.32 unaccounted for from the sale of the investors security being held in trust by PSBL.- Accepted as fact by admission of PSDL statement provided.5. A further £739,198.68 was withdrawn from the investors trust account and did not go towards the completion of the investors development, leaving a balance of £190,000.00 as the assured rent for Asquith House in breach of the SDD.This leaves £3,527,929.00 unaccounted for from the sale of the investors security being held in trust by PSBL.- Accepted as fact by admission of PSDL statement provided.

4. Breaches by PSDL and PSBL to implement the option to sell the FHT AOS 10.11

1. A Charge cannot be removed unless it is "with the approval of the Buyer".2. I have never given approval, and neither has my solicitor.3. Many others investors confirm this.- Established in fact from solicitor documents received.

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 13 of 14

Statement of Fact - Microcosm - Trustees Breaches of Trust Page 3 of 4

4.1. Charge against FHT as investors security.

1. The possible breach of trust described in 2.1 and 2.2, and the breach of trust in 4 causes no harm as the Title Absolute, 4 is as follows;

(07.11.2016) The Transfer to the proprietor contains a covenant to observe and perform the covenants referred to in the Charges Register and of indemnity in respect thereof.

COVENANT.Practice - The name of a common-law form of action ex contractu, which lies for the recovery of damages for breach of a covenant, or contract under seal.Law of Contracts - An agreement, convention, or promise of two or more parties, by deed in writing, signed, sealed, and delivered, by which either of the parties pledges himself to the other that something is either done or shall be done, or stipulates for the truth of certain factsBlack's Law Dictionary 4th Edition..

2. The intent is clear in this trust agreement that TL and GAM have taken over all of PSDL's liability to deliver the benefit to all beneficiaries of the investors agreements, and is further confirmed as fact as the covenant includes agreements under Law of Contracts to cover the outstanding payments to suppliers, sub contractors and the like owed money as a result of our AOS individually.

HARM CAUSED - None as TL and GAM hold full liability to indemnify harmed as a requirement of the FHT!

4.2. Charge against PSDL as investors security.

1. To be a trust account it can only be used in accordance with the trust agreement.2. The money was deposited as a receipt from the sale of the FHT and hence the intent can be none other than to be for the use of the beneficiaries with the condition that if it fell below the minimum balance in accordance with table 10.10.3. £739,198.68 was withdrawn in breach of the SDD, and once it fell below the required amount it was topped up in accordance with the SDD only once and has been in default since 23 Feb 2017. 4. SDD Background B states "The Company has a legal charge over the Reversion to secure the Developers obligations to the Company and Buyers. ", and confirms the FHT WYK463417 in the agreed terms.

REVERSIONARY INTEREST. The interest which a person has in the reversion of lands or other property. A right to the future enjoyment of property, at present in the possession or occupationof another.Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

As the FHT was only transferred on the 7 Nov 2016 this may have been true and this can be confirmed by the Land Registry.5. It is not possible that his referred to the PSDLC as that was removed on the 30 June 2016 and hence must have been signed before and this can be verified by Companies House.6. An Additional charge was made against PSDL on the 5 April 2017 by fancy that... Tuscola (105) Limited, being a legal mortgage for against property PSDL own for £.297,370.32

NOTICE OF CLAIM - UNIT 609 AUSTIN HALL, OPPORTUNITY FOR REMEDY Page 14 of 14

Statement of Fact - Microcosm - Trustees Breaches of Trust Page 4 of 4

7. A further charge on PSDL was registered the following month on the 3 May 2017, being a mortgage for the leasehold title YY79835 by none other than.....MVGL where Carl Mills is also a Director ,for the sum of £150,000.00...8. A further Charge on PSDL was registered on the 4 May 2017 by PSBL against the lease YY79835 which is worthless as security as it creates an annual obligation of £152,000 per year with approximately the same income!9. Legal charges are settled in accordance with the date they were created and hence now when PSDL the investors have no security here, however TL and GAM in the FHT hold full liability so it matters not!

HARM CAUSED - £739,198.68 was withdrawn in breach of the SDD

5. PSDL, HB, USL taking rental from Austin Hall Investors

1 The completed leases' units entered into the management contract with HB. which is the only way to receive the assured rent. (anyone who gave notice that has not completed get that withdrawn as that is needed to claim assured rent!)2. Due to unknown reasons HB disappeared out of the picture and many investors cancelled their contract with HB and appear to be in negotiations.3. Despite Austin Hall not having reached practical completion my unit has been rented out since September 2017.- Accepted as fact by admission of USL statement provided.4. USL is not paying completed leaseholders- Accepted as fact by admission of PSDL statement provided.

HARM CAUSED - Asquith House estimated £1,000,000 (hearsay) and Austin Hall estimated £200,000 (100 units £100pw 20 weeks)

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, affirmed / notarised at

Claimant: Signaturec/o 6 Mersey Road, Aigburth, Liverpool Witness #1: Signature

Contact details:

Witness #2: Signature

Contact details