Bernard BARANI EC INFSO D Directorate Network and Communication Technologies STANDARDS AND...
-
Upload
ashley-robinson -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
3
Transcript of Bernard BARANI EC INFSO D Directorate Network and Communication Technologies STANDARDS AND...
Bernard BARANIBernard BARANIEC INFSO DEC INFSO D
Directorate “Network and Communication Technologies”
STANDARDS AND INTEROPERABILITY IN ICT ETP’s
ETSI, 23-24 October 2006 - Sophia Antipolis - France
ICT R&D and standards:
From experience to prospects
From a policy perspective Support Internal Market and deployment of pan EU systems/services; Open standards facilitate competition and consumer protection; Promote global solutions, and support emergence of EU positions on global issues;
From a research perspective a powerful consensus making instrument; an instrument to catalyse exploitation of research results; an efficient co-operation platform with other regions of the world; A natural link to research for those issue that are system oriented
From the inception of the Framework Programme in the 80’s, ICT R&D has been systematically encouraged to generate standardisation spinn offs, especially in the telecom, broadcasting, and audio visual domains,
mainly through ETSI, DVB and MPEG groups.
The Importance of Standardisation
OFDM on copper pair, ADSL, then VDSL: RACE, ACTS ADSL deployment success worldwide, EU companies at the forefront;
BRAN, HiperLan, HiperMAN: RACE, ACTS WiFi and WiMax deployments/prospects;
Fiber to the Cabinet/curb/…/Home: from RACE to IST FP6 prospects for FTTH are now becoming real, European deployment initiatives and clarification of regulatory regime
3G/UMTS: RACE, ACTS EU success at standardisation level; Y2005: significant take off of UMTS world-wide, exceeding EV-DO. Strong position of EU industry leveraging the “GSM expertise”
B3G/4G: ACTS, IST FP5, IST FP6 issue still developing, EU FP actions support partnership with Asia (CJK, mITF, FuTURE, NGMC)
Broadband Satellite: ACTS, IST FP5, IST FP6 High expectations, high investments, still niche markets. Availability of DVB-RCS and DVB S2 standard
DTV-HDTV: from RACE to IST FP5 world-wide success of DVB standard; promising prospects for EU led technology like MPEG4 for HDTV; MHP gaining momentum. Strong EU industrial leaders.
Mobile TV, DVB-H: from ACTS to IST FP6 promising technology developed in the EU, need to progress on the regulatory/spectrum front. PLC: IST FP6 consolidated EU expertise, even if PLC at the access level may be less prominent
UWB: IST FP5, FP6 better positioning of EU industry and regulatory regime being clarified
EU R&D: Broadband Technologies
Competition bearing fruits. 15% (of EU population) penetration. Incumbents: less than 50% of the access share. Costs of LLU and shared access have dropped by more than 30% between 2002 and 2005. Access rates in the DSL range, FTTx plans. Uneven situation across MS.
EU Broadband penetration rate, 1 July 2006
6,75
%
7,53
%
7,85
%
8,35
%
8,42
%
11,4
6% 12,9
0%
12,9
1%
13,1
5%
13,4
4% 15,2
8%
16,5
5%
17,6
1%
18,6
5%
19,3
6%
20,1
5%
20,8
0%
24,9
9%
29,0
8%
29,4
2%
14,8
6%
2,68
% 4,00
%
3,94
%
5,85
%
6,75
%
15,2
3% 16,5
9%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
EL PL SK EU10 CY LV HU IE LT CZ SI MT PT IT ES EU25 AT DE EE EU15 LU FR UK SE BE FI NL DK
July 06
Resulting landscape
1980-1992: GSM R&D
1984-1987: COST 207 contributions to GSM Radio;
1987: GSM Directive requesting MS to reserve frequency band in the 900 MHz range
1988: ETSI creation and Special Mobile Group (SMG)
1989-1996: COST 231, definition of multi-band radio handsets
1990-1994: RACE phase II, launch of exploratory 3G EU projects on TDMA CDMA options
1992: First Commercial GSM network opens
1992: ITU WARC “FPLMTS” allocation
1994: Industrial RACE “UMTS Vision”
1994-1998: ACTS, launch of a consistent series (40M+) on 3G
ACTS Contribution to CAMEL under SMG, through Intelligent Network R&D
1997: Creation of UMTS Forum out of the ACTS UMTS Task Force
1998: ETSI UMTS standard from FRAMES project, Rel 99 from RAINBOW project
1999: EU Council UMTS Decision, not retaining licensing harmonisation across EU
1998-2002: IST launch, 120 ME investments in early Beyond 3G R&D
2000: ITU allocation of IMT 2000 Extension bands
2001: WWRF creation, out of an IST initiative;
2002: 1st EU CEPT mandate to harmonise extension bands
2002: ITU WP8F 4G “Vision document” based on IST work: interop, SW radio, multi layer radios, all IP
2002-2006: Launch of IST FP6, 300 M€+ dedicated to SB3G
2003: WRC 2003 opens an agenda item under WRC 07 to explore 4G allocations
2004: Launch of the Wireless World Initiative, IST sponsored
2005: Launch of the eMobility ETP
2G 3G B3G
EU R&D: Mobile Technologies
Mobile: a continuous success. All Member States at least at 80% penetration (Poland a little lower), and growth rates still above 6%, some MS above 10%. Increased competition, 79 operators, 214 MVNO’s. Take off of 3G: 79 licenses 59 commercial networks (09-05). Video very popular.
Source: EC, 11th implementation report
Resulting landscape
…FP3 FP4 FP5 FP6 FP7
1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010
…
COMPRESSION DELIVERY INTERACTIVITY
DTTBDTTBHAMLETHAMLET
……**
ATLANTICATLANTICMOMUSYSMOMUSYS
ISISISISVALIDATEVALIDATEEMPHASISEMPHASIS
VIPERVIPERMPEG-4 PCMPEG-4 PCMIRADORMIRADORTALISMANTALISMAN
ADPSADPSCODECCODEC
QUOVADISQUOVADISDIGISATDIGISATCINENETCINENET
INTERACTINTERACTDVBIRDDVBIRD
MOTIVATEMOTIVATE……**
CISMUNDUSCISMUNDUSCONFLUENTCONFLUENT
SAMBITSSAMBITSSAVANTSAVANTNEXTVNEXTV
MASCOTMASCOTMOBILITYMOBILITY
TPMHPTPMHPCODISCODIS
GMF4ITVGMF4ITVMONASIDREMONASIDRE
MODISMODIS……**
INSTINCTINSTINCTMHP-KDBMHP-KDB
MHP-CONFIDENCEMHP-CONFIDENCEPARTAKEPARTAKE
PHENIX-SSAPHENIX-SSAVAS-CHINAVAS-CHINAMAESTROMAESTROB-BONEB-BONE
C-MOBILEC-MOBILE……**
More info:
www.cordis.lu/ist
www.cordis.lu/fp6
www.cordis.lu/fp7
DRM MOBILITY
* indicative list of projects
EU R&D: Audio Visual Technologies
Also, a first attempt towards system integration: Home Networks (FP5, FP6)
Spin Off: Mobile TV and DVB-H Deployment Prospects
Trials: Australia: Sydney Austria: Graz Canada: Toronto China: Czech Republic: Brno Denmark: Lyngby Finland: Helsinki France: Metz, Paris (2) Germany: Berlin (BMCO, ), Erlangen, North German States Italy: Turin Netherlands: The Hague Portugal: Lisbon Spain: Barcelona, Madrid Switzerland: Bern Taiwan: Taipei United Kingdom: Cambridge, Oxford (Arqiva, O2) ........
Deployments:Nationwide deployments expected in 2006:
Italy USA Finland
EU Taking steps to catalyse deployment, EMBC
~ 40 DVB-H pilot trials in the world, ~ 25 in Europe More information: http://www.dvb-h-online.org
Reducing churn, Capex, Opex and opening new “Networked” business opportunities
From Single technologies as business, social and growth enablers to integrated complex systems as enablers;
Converged systems and offers have become integral part of the evolution strategies put forward by ICT players and are getting increased recognition from the markets;
Convergence has been recognised as an important trend and policy enabler under the i2010 ICT Policy Framework proposed by the EC. It cuts across the 3 pillars (Information space, Innovation, Inclusion);
In other regions of the world, this trend has also been recognised as a driver for R&D policies (839 initiative of Korea, u_Japan…)
- Cross cutting issues become more systematic;
- Impact on the siloed networks, and on the siloed standards
Context for Future Research
Proliferation of connected devices, from passive RFID to active sensors;
Edge networking, context awareness, event filtering, event management through distributed middleware;
Service architectures, from syntactic description and static programmed services to semantic modelling and dynamic service discovery;
Networked distributed computing platforms, Grid computing
Content explosion, long tail, Web 2.0. From content search protection and delivery to (user ctrld) content management;
Trust in the Net
Wireless, from “last mile” to last meter: multiplicity of topologies, ad-hoc, meshed..Cognitive radio, spectrum.
Internet limitations
Broadband, broadband, broadband...
Pervasive Networking: a sample of R&D
Technological Drivers
+ Regional Initiatives: GENI, u_Korea, u_Japan, 863..
2단계 : 이력 관리2nd Step : Active Tags2nd Step : Active Tags
센싱형Tag
센싱형Tag
Tag with battery
Longer range
3rd Step :Sensor Tags3rd Step :Sensor Tags
센싱형Tag센싱형Tag
SensingTag
Sensing & ControlWSN
Products
Identifying product code
센싱형Tag
센싱형Tag
PassiveTag
1st Step:Passive RFID Tags1st Step:Passive RFID Tags
Ad-Hoc Network
4th Step : Sensor Network4th Step : Sensor Network
WSN
PDA
Sensor
E2E Broadband & Secure Internet InfrastructurePervasive Wireless
Content Centric Peer communities
Multiplicity of Environments
A Converged System Perspective
Wider Area Net
Home Nets
Consumer “control” Access to advertising budgets with value models
valuing the addressed customer base; Telco models vs Internet models; Cellular models vs Fixed-mobile convergence
models; Access to spectrum, broadcast vs mobile vs satcom; Access to content owners; Open models vs closed models
Making the various models possible whilst ensuring level playing competition and customer protection are at the heart of the EC
technological and regulatory actions. Standards have a role to play in making possible a variety of converged business models
These are possible topics for X Platform issues
Implications and Challenges
Technological pace: the various dimensions of
standards
Sourc
e:
WW
RF
Networks
Policies
Long cycles – up to ~ a decadeInvestigation and test of new radio technology
Regulation and allocation of spectrum
Development of new generation radio products
Medium cycles – ~7 yearsfor IP based functions (e.g. for mobility)
Introduction of IPv6 will last longer
Terminals
Short cycles – up to ~2 years
Moore’s Law, Hardware changes, new
peripherals and innovative form factors
Terminals
Shorter cycles – up to ~1 a year
Dynamic evolution of services
Regular updates of targets required
Services
Different innovation cycles – and of market entry barriers - may imply different approaches to standardisation, from ex ante to ex post.
Convergence and diversity of players brings about different approaches to standard related issues :
Classical FRAND IPR model, with patent royalties considered as the fair remuneration of research. Model getting increasingly complex, due to emergence of myriad of players and possible “instability”;
Emergence of new models, e.g OSS model or royalty free models; consumer interests (open standards), vs Differentiations (close
business models?); Time to market and economic efficiency (standards e.g. “de facto”,
not necessarily open) Importance of Software, from system standard to interface
standardIs the classical model of collaborative R&D feeding industrial consensus
and standards still appropriate? How can converged platforms with varying srd models be sustainable? How to best couple R&D with
standardisation? Can the Platforms help?
Implications and Challenges
- From a mainly Internal market driven perspective (EU wide harmonisation) à la GSM with single std approach
- Towards a market driven pro competitive environment where several standards may co-exist.
- Whist there is a tendency to oppose these approaches, they are not necessarily exclusive:
….It is often asked whether, on balance, standardization acts more to constrain innovation or to enable innovation. From our perspective these two activities are inextricably linked. Standardization does constrain activities but in doing so creates an infrastructure for subsequent innovation. Well-designed standards should be able to reduce undesirable outcomes. Moreover, standardization is not just about producing norms for given technologies in given markets. Standardization helps to credibility, focus and critical mass in markets for new technologies….(Manchester Business School, report for DTI).
- Deployment of pan EU widely adopted standards remains an option, e.g. mobile TV on-going debate;
- In this case, a co-ordinated approach of industry towards the regulator is key (see creation of EMBC).
Role for Platforms?
The Changing environment
IST FP6: a significant effort has been devoted to co-operation with third countries;
In standard related areas, Asia and South America have received particular attention (e.g IST call 6);
Several approaches to standards co-operation: ex ante (std not yet existing), ex post (existing standard);
Varying levels of results and experiences;
A solid approach to International co-operation and standards is required for IST FP7.
ETP contribution in this field would be very desirable.
Standards, R&D and International Co-operation
Software; 8
GRID; 7
Audiovisual; 6
Transport; 3
e-government; 2
e-business / e-work; 5
Research Networks; 2
Awareness; 2RFID; 1Health; 1
Telecom; 13
The Bulk of this R&D or co-operation activity is directly or indirectly related to standards, with significant participation of industry
A Typical example: China in IST FP6
ICT, the most important budget share under the “Co-operation” Programme: <9.050 to 9120 Bn€ > (TBD)
21-23 November 2006 – IST Event Helsinki see: ec.europa.eu/information_society/istevent/2006
4 – 5 Decembre: End of legislative process (FP, SP, RfP)
15 December: Workhsop “Future Internet, perspectives in FP7” - Brussels
(Dec) January 2007 - Publication of Call 1
1 February 2007 – European ICT Proposers Day Cologne (europa.eu.int/information_society)
April 2007 – Deadline for submission Call 1
Call 2, 4 months later
FP7-ICT Status
Fut
ure
and
Em
ergi
ng
Tec
hnol
ogie
s
COGNITIVE SYSTEMS, INTERACTION, ROBOTICSCOGNITIVE SYSTEMS, INTERACTION, ROBOTICS
PERVASIVE AND TRUSTED NETWORK AND SERVICE PERVASIVE AND TRUSTED NETWORK AND SERVICE INFRASTRUCTURESINFRASTRUCTURES
COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, ENGINEERINGCOMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, ENGINEERING
DIGITAL DIGITAL LIBRARIES LIBRARIES AND AND CONTENTCONTENT
TOWARDS TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE SUSTAINABLE AND AND PERSONALISED PERSONALISED
HEALTHCAREHEALTHCARE
ICT FOR ICT FOR MOBILITY, MOBILITY, ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SUSTAINABILITY AND ENERGYAND ENERGY EFFICIENCYEFFICIENCY
ICT for ICT for independent independent living and living and inclusioninclusion
End-to-end systems for Socio-economic goalsEnd-to-end systems for Socio-economic goals
Tec
hn
olo
gy
road
blo
cks
ICT Work Programme 2007-08 DRAFT Challenges
ETPs
Flagships
~2billion Euros/2 years
Bulk of « Classical » ETSI standardisation activities
www.nem-initiative.org
www.emobility.eu.org
www.isi-initiative.eu.org/
www.nessi-initiative.org
Large Scale EU Partnerships joining the
future
Materialising EU industry commitment Putting in place large scale partnerships, including SME’s and academia Taking a system and end to end approach Demonstrating economic and competitiveness impact Defining the EU long term Strategic Research Agenda’s Acting as vector of strategic co-operation with third countries Implementing research and downstream deployment issues (regs, stds..)
Technology PlatformsPlatforms directly related to « Challenge 1 »
Challenge 3 PlatformsChallenge 3 Platforms
www.artemis-office.org
www.eniac.eu
www.smart-systems-integration.org
www.photonics21.de
Challenge 2 PlatformChallenge 2 Platform
EUROP, Robotics
Draft 2007-2008 Budget Distribution
(v ISTC 18_10_06)Challenge 1: 5851. The network of the future 200
2. Service and software architectures, infrastructures and engineering 150
3. Secure, dependable and trusted infrastructures 90
4. Networked media 85
5. New Paradigms and experimental facilities 40
6. Critical infrastructure protection 20
Challenge 2: 1931. Cognitive systems, interaction, robotics 193
Challenge 3: 4341. Next generation nanoelectronics
components and electronics integration 86
2. Organic and large-area electronics and display systems 63
3. Embedded systems design 40
4. Computing systems 25
5. Photonic components and subsystems 90
6. Micro/nanosystems 83
7. Networked embedded and control systems 47
Challenge 4: 2031. Digital libraries, usage and learning 102
2. Intelligent content creation and management 101
Challenge 5: 1741. Personal health systems for monitoring and point-of-care diagnostics 72
2. Advanced ICT for risk assessment and patient safety 30
3. Virtual physiological human 72
Challenge 6: 1591. ICT for the intelligent car and mobility services 57
2. ICT for cooperative systems 48
3. ICT for the environmental management and energy efficiency 54
Challenge 7: 731. ICT and ageing 30
2. Accessible and inclusive ICT 43
FET 185Horizontal support actions 14
Total: 2020 Million Euros
Strong interactions between ICT R&D and standards has proved to be an efficient way to valorise research results;
Changing environment through convergence and complexity: different approaches to stds will co-exist;
Very competitive environment and sector getting mature, implies that pan EU deployment of standardised systems and technologies should be approached on a case by case basis
In this context, strong industrial consensus and orientations towards regulators are key;
With partnership in the order of 200-400 Members, European Technology Platforms are well placed to initiate the discussion on standards already at R&D level
Conclusions
Target model
Communication / Broadband Biz
Cultural Complex Biz
Contents Biz
Computing Power Biz
S/W Solution Biz
Knowledge Consulting Biz
Total Solution Provider
New Growth Engine
Communication service Provider
Multimedia Service Aggregator
Mid-term
As-Is
Business Model Evolution Industrial Partnership evolution
Convergence, a View from Asia
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
7
10
9
12
11
New Biz R&D Focus
Contents
Cultural Complex
Knowledge Consulting
Service
Software Solution
Computing Power
Ubiquitous contents web to create and share personal experiences
Global contents aggregation & delivery platform for One Source Multi Use
Mobile USN to collect local information in real time
Cultural complex to provide entertainment, wellbeing, education,…
Next generation medical solutions for early and remote diagnosis/prescription
Intelligent internet to provide valuable knowledge for customers
Intelligence technology for cyber community for customers’ social networking
Multi-modal IC chip and S/W platform
Intelligent network robot solutions to make communication and control possible
Convenient interface based on five senses
Computing platform to provide distributed computing power
Open service platform based on user-managed network ASP
And its R&D Implications
Recommendations of the ICT Task Force: “Industry recommends that any policy effort relating to technical interoperability
should encourage broad stakeholder cooperation and voluntary market-oriented solutions to achieve the goal of interoperability rather than legislate the specific means to achieve it. In support of industry-led efforts, the EU and the Member States should maintain a policy priority for interoperability along other key objectives such as innovation and security, support industry-led standardisation and promote the widespread adoption of standards in products and service implementations. Policy measures should allow for temporal and business considerations in a competitive marketplace and may include, as appropriate, active dialogue with industry on challenges in formation of value networks and other potential barriers to implementation of interoperability as well as maintaining an agenda of priority identification, target-setting and monitored progress of interoperability in respect of an evolving priority list of functional digital enablers of ICT innovation and uptake.”
).
Interoperability-Standards-Policy