1

Berkeley Bibliography

(1979-2019)

Abad, Juan Vázques. “Observaciones sobre la noción de causa en el opusculo sobre el movimiento

de Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 35-44.

Abelove, H. “George Berkeley’s Attitude to John Wesley: the Evidence of a Lost Letter.” Harvard

Theological Review 70 (1977): 175-76.

Ablondi, Fred. “Berkeley, Archetypes, and Errors.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (2005): 493-

504.

_____. “Absolute Beginners: Learning Philosophy by Learning Descartes and Berkeley.”

Metascience 19 (2010): 385-89.

_____. “On the Ghosts of Departed Quantities.” Metascience 21 (2012): 681-83.

_____. “Hutcheson, Perception, and the Sceptic’s Challenge.” British Journal for the History of

Philosophy 20 (2012): 269-81.

Ackel, Helen. Über den Prozess der menschlichen Erkenntnis bei John Locke und George Berkeley.

München und Ravensburg: Grin, 2008.

Adamczykowa, Izabella. “The Role of the Subject in the Cognitive Process after George Berkeley:

Passive for Active Subject?” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Sklodowska, Sectio 1

Philosophia-Sociologia 6 (1981): 43-57.

Adar, Einat. “From Irish Philosophy to Irish Theatre: The Blind (Wo)Man Made to See.” Estudios

Irlandeses 12 (2017): 1-11.

Addyman, David and Feldman, Matthew. “Samuel Beckett, Wilhelm Windelband, and the Interwar

‘Philosophy Notes’.” Modernism/Modernity 18 (2011): 755-70.

Agassi, Joseph. “The Future of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” International Studies in Philosophy 7

(1975), 167-78.

Aichele, Alexander. “Ich Denke Was, Was Du Nicht Denkst, Und Das Ist Rot. John Locke Und

George Berkeley Über Abstrakte Ideen Und Kants Logischer Abstraktionismus.” Kant-

Studien 103 (2012): 25-46.

Airaksinen, Timo. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8

(1985), 9.

_____. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48

(1987), 235-56.

_____. “The Chain and the Animal: Idealism in Berkeley’s Siris.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 224-

43.

_____. “The Path of Fire: The Meaning and Interpretation of Berkeley’s Siris.” In Daniel, New

Interpretations (2007), 261-81.

_____. “Berkeley and Newton on Gravity in Siris.” In Parigi (2010b), 87-106.

_____. “Active Principles and Trinities in Berkeley’s Siris.” Revue Philosophique de la France et

de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 57-70.

_____. “Rhetoric and Corpuscularism in Berkeley’s Siris.” History of European Ideas 37 (2011):

23-34.

2

_____. “Light and Causality in Siris.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 91-118.

_____. “Idealistic Ethics and Berkeley’s Good God.” In Farris et al. (2016), 218-36.

_____. “In the Upper Room: Metaphysics and Theology in Berkeley’s Ethics.” Philosophy and

Theology 27 (2015): 427-56.

_____. “Vulgar Thoughts: Berkeley on Responsibility and Freedom.” In Charles 2015, 115-30.

_____. “Berkeley’s Siris: An Interpretation.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 216-46.

Airaksinen, Timo, and Belfrage, Bertil, eds. Berkeley’s Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Newcastle

upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2011.

Airaksinen, Timo, and Gylling, Heta. “A threat like no other threat, George Berkeley against the

freethinkers.” History of European Ideas 43 (2017): 598-613.

Alejandra Manzo, Silvia. “Eter, espirito animal e causalidade no Siris de George Berkeley: uma

visao imaterialista da analogia entre macrocosmo e microcosmo.” Scientiae Studia 2 (2004):

179-205.

Alfonso, Louis, E. “The Notes on the Government and Population of the Kingdom of Naples and

Berkeley’s Probable Route to Sicily.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 20-27.

Alves, Pedro. “A Proposta (I) Modesta de Berkeley. Um Mundo Sem Matéria.” Philosophica 38

(2011): 59-74.

Allaire, Edwin B. “Berkeley’s Idealism: Yet Another Visit.” In Muehlmann (1995), 23-38.

Ameeri, Javed Iqbal. “Factors and Main Trends in Early British Empiricism. An Overview.”

Journal of European Studies 8 (1992): 78-93.

Ameriks, Karl. “Idealism from Kant to Berkeley.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 244-68.

Anapolitanos, D. A. “The Continuous and the Discrete: Leibniz versus Berkeley and Locke.”

Philosophical Inquiry 13 (1991): 1-24.

Andersen, K. “One of Berkeley’s Arguments on Compensating Errors in the Calculus.” Historia

mathematica 38 (2011): 219-31.

Aramendia Muneta, Enrique. “La visión en Marr y Berkeley. El problema de perderse el principio

de la película.” Daimon, Revista de Filosofia 59 (May-Aug 2013): 125-44.

Arbour, Benjamin H. “God, Idealism, and Time: A Berkeleyan Approach to Old Questions.” In

Cowan and Spiegel 2016, 127-152.

Arbour, Benjamin H. and Trickett, Gregory E. “Evil Does Not Pose Any Special Problem for

Berkeleyan Idealism: An Idealist Response to John DePoe.” Philosophia Christi 20 (2018):

567-80.

Ariotti, Piero. “Benedetto Castelli and George Berkeley as Anticipators of Recent Findings on the

Moon Illusion.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 9 (1973): 328-32.

Ariso, José Marìa. “Sobre el riesgo de confundir el lenguaje cósmico de Kandinsky con el lenguaje

divino del obispo Berkeley.” Agora 32 (2013): 95-106.

Armogathe, Jean-Robert. “Proofs of the Existence of God.” In Garber (1998), 305-30.

Armstrong, D. M. “The Heart of Berkeley’s Metaphysics: a Reply to Ernest Sosa.” Hermathena 139

(1985): 162-64.

Arsi’c, Branka. The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett). Stanford, CA:

Stanford University Press, 2003.

3

Asfour, Amal and Williamson, Paul. “Splendid Impositions: Gainsborough, Berkeley, Hume.”

Eighteenth-Century Studies 31 (1998): 403-32.

Asher, W. O. “Berkeley on Absolute Motion.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987): 447-66.

Aston, Nigel. “Rationalism, the Enlightenment, and Sermons.” In The Oxford Handbook of the

British Sermon 1689-1901, eds. Keith A. Francis, William Gibson, John Morgan-Guy, Bob

Tennant, and Robert H. Ellison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Astore, Rocco A. “Doubting Descartes: How Berkeley’s Immaterialism Outshines the Cartesian

System.” Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities 10 (2018): 111-117.

Atherton, Margaret. “The Coherence of Berkeley’s Theory of Mind.” Philosophy and

Phenomenological Research 43 (1983): 389-400.

_____. Berkeley’s Revolution in Vision. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.

_____. “Corpuscles, Mechanism, and Essentialism in Berkeley and Locke.” Journal of the History

of Philosophy 29 (1991): 47-67.

_____. “Berkeley without God.” In Muehlmann (1995), 231-48.

_____. “Lady Mary Shepherd’s Case against George Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of

Philosophy 4 (1996): 347-66.

_____. “How to write the History of Vision: Understanding the Relationship between Berkeley and

Descartes.” In Levin (1997), 139-66.

_____, ed. The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. Lanham, MD: Rowman

& Littlefield, 1999.

_____. “Apprendre à voir: les enseignements de la Défense de la Théorie de la vision.” In Berlioz

(2003), 135-57.

_____. “Comment Berkeley parvient à maintenir que la neige est blanche.” In Charles (2004), 127-

44.

_____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision and Its Reception.” In Winkler (2005), 94-124.

_____. “The Objects of Immediate Perception.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 107-19.

_____. “ ‘The Books Are in the Study as Before’: Berkeley’s Claims About Real Physical Objects.”

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 85-100.

_____. “Doctor Johnson Kicks the Stone, or Can the Immaterialisms of the Principles and Three

Dialogues Be Reconciled?” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical

Association 87 (Nov 2013): 44-59.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Idealism by Georges Dicker. Mind 122 (2013): 278-81.

_____. “Berkeley and Skepticism.” In Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present, edited by Diego

W. Machuca and Baron Reed. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018. Pp. 369-79.

_____. Berkeley. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

Ayers, Michael R. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and Kant’s Transcendental Idealism.” In Idealism

Past and Present, ed. Godfrey Vesey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 51-

69.

_____. “Berkeley and the Meaning of Existence.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 567-74.

_____. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In Garber (1998), 1003-61.

_____. “Ideas and Objective Being.” In Garber (1998), 1062-1107.

4

_____. “Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?” In Winkler (2005), 34-62.

_____. “Berkeley, Ideas, and Idealism.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 11-28.

Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In Garber (1998), 1003-

1061.

Baber, H. E. “Berkeley and the Tattletale Paradox.” Idealistic Studies 19 (1989): 79-82.

Bahr, Fernando. Review of Siris: Empirismo e idealismo platónico en el siglo XVII, ed. and trans.

by Jorge L. Martin. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía 38 (2012): 123-24.

Baier, Annette. “The Intentionality of Intentions.” Review of Metaphysics 30 (1977): 389-414.

Baladi, Naguib. “Plotin et l’immatérialisme de Berkeley: témoignage de la Siris.” In Plotino e il

neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, ed. Enrico Cerulli. Roma: Accademia Nazionale

dei Lincei, 1974, 597-604.

Baldwin, Louis. Portraits of God: Word Pictures of the Deity from the Earliest Times through

Today. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2012.

Barber, Kenneth F. and Gracia, Jorge J. E., eds. Individuation and Identity in Early Modern

Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press, 1994.

Bardout, Jean-Christophe. “Berkeley et les métaphysiques de son temps.” Journal of the History of

Philosophy 46 (2008): 119-139.

Bar-On, A. Z. “Husserl’s Berkeley.” Analecta Husserliana 16 (1983): 353-63.

Barnouw, Jeffrey. “The Two Motives Behind Berkeley’s Expressly Unmotivated Signs: Sure

Perception and Personal Providence.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 145-77.

Baum, Robert J. “The Instrumentalist and Formalist Elements of Berkeley’s Philosophy of

Mathematics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3 (1972): 119-34.

Baxter, Donald. “Berkeley, Perception and Identity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

51 (1991): 85-98.

_____. “Abstraction, Inseparability and Identity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57

(1997): 307-30.

Beal, M. W. “Berkeley’s Deletions.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1976): 455-78.

Belfrage, Bertil. “A New Dating of Berkeley’s Draft Introduction.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977):

10-11.

_____. “Notes by Berkeley on Moral Philosophy.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 4-7.

_____. Review of Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries, edited by George Thomas. Berkeley

Newsletter 2 (1978): 10.

_____. Review of George Pitcher, Berkeley. Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 10.

_____. “A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics in a Hitherto Unpublished Berkeleian Manuscript.”

Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 1-4.

_____. Review of Berkeley, Philosophisches Tagebuch, translated by Wolfgang Breidert. Berkeley

Newsletter 3 (1979): 17-19.

_____. Review of George Berkeley in America by Edwin S. Gaustad. Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980):

16-17.

_____. “Corrigenda to ‘A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics’.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 19.

5

_____. Review of Berkeley, Drei Dialogen zwischen Hulas und Philonous. Introduced by

Wolfgang Breidert. Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 17.

_____. “The Newport Extract of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 6-9.

_____. “An Obscure Supplement to Volume One of Berkeley’s Works.” Berkeley Newsletter 6

(1982/83): 17-21.

_____. “Dating Berkeley’s Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 7-13.

_____. “Facts Concerning Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 17-22.

_____. “Strata in Berkeley’s Notebooks [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 10-11.

_____. “The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 117-26.

_____. “The Order and Dating of Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154

(1985): 196-214.

_____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708).” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 643-

49.

_____. “Development of Berkeley’s Early Theory of Meaning.” Revue philosophique de la France

et de l’étranger (1986): 319-30.

_____. “Une nouvelle édition de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger

(1986): 367-72.

_____, ed., George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. An editio diplomatica transcribed and

edited with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Doxa, 1987.

_____. “A Response to M. A. Stewart’s ‘Berkeley’s Introduction Draft’.” Berkeley Newsletter 12

(1991/92): 1-10.

_____. “The Constructivism of Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Cummins and Zoeller

(1992): 167-86.

_____. “Berkeley.” In The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century British Philosophers, ed. J. W. Yolton,

J. V. Price, and J. Stephens. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999, 84-90.

_____. “Vers une nouvelle interprétation de la Théorie de la vision de Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003),

159-211.

_____. “The Scientific Background of George Berkeley’s Idealism.” In Gersh and Moran (2006),

202-23.

_____. “Berkeley’s Four Concepts of the Soul (1707-1709).” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley

(2007), 172-87.

_____. “The Theological Positivism of George Berkeley (1707-1708).” In Lemetti and Piirimäe

(2007), 37-52.

_____. “A Paradigm Shift in George Berkeley’s Philosophy 1707-1709.” Revue Philosophique de

la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 71-82.

_____. “Berkeley’s Way towards Constructivism, 1707-1709.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),

3-14.

_____. “On George Berkeley’s Alleged Letter to Browne: A Study in Unsound Rhetoric.” Berkeley

Studies 22 (2011): 3-8.

_____. “Atomism in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 85-98.

6

_____. “The Mystery of Goodness in Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” In Belfrage and Brook

(2017), 141-57.

Belfrage, Bertil, and Brook, Richard, eds. The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley. New York:

Bloomsbury, 2017.

Bellemare, Pierre and Raynor, David. “Berkeley’s Letters to le Clerc (1711).” Hermathena 146

(1989): 7-23.

Benítez, Laura. “El espíritu como principio activo en Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 23-

34.

Bennett, Jonathan. “On Translating Locke, Berkeley and Hume into English.” Teaching Philosophy

17 (1994): 261-69.

_____. Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume.

Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.

Benschop, Hans Peter. “Berkeley, Lee and Abstract Ideas.” British Journal for the History of

Philosophy 5 (1997): 55-66.

Benson, Charles. “Prior’s Authentic Narrative.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 14-15.

Ben-Zeev, A. “Reexamining Berkeley’s Notion of Suggestion.” Conceptus 23 (1989): 21-30.

Berchielli, Laura. “Conoscenza analogica e teoria del significato nell’Alcifrone. Novità e

tradizione.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 383-92.

Berlioz, Dominique. “G. Berkeley: ‘Of Infinites’.” Revue philosophique (1982): 45-57.

_____. “ ‘To stand for’ et ‘to represent’ dans l’Introduction manuscrite de Berkeley.” Revue

philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 331-38.

_____. Berkeley. Un nominalisme réaliste (Paris: J. Vrin, 2000).

_____, ed. Berkeley: Langage de la perception et art de voir. Débats philosophiques. Paris: PUF,

2003.

_____. “Vision et géométrie chez Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 145-61.

_____, and Nef, Frederic. “Berkeley ou l’idée contre la représentation.” In Ong-Van-Cung (2006),

163-77.

Berman, David. “Berkeley’s Letter to H. Clarke.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 9.

_____. “Mrs. Berkeley’s Annotations in her Interleaved Copies of An Account of the Life of

Berkeley (1776).” Hermathena (1977): 15-28.

_____. “A New Berkeley Portrait.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 8-9.

_____. “A Note on Berkeley and his Catholic Countrymen.” Long Room 16-17 (1978): 26-28.

_____. “Berkeley’s Letter to Lord Orrey.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 12-13.

_____. “Berkeley’s Departure for America: a New Letter.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 14.

_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophical Reception after America.” Archiv fûr Geschichte der Philosophie

62 (1980): 311-20.

_____. “Bishop Berkeley and the Fountains of Living Waters.” Hermathena 128 (1980): 21-31.

_____. “Cognitive Theology and Emotive Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.” Proceedings of the

Royal Irish Academy (1981): 219-29.

_____. “Did Berkeley Write Guardian 130?” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 10-13.

7

_____ and Berman, Jill. “The Fountains Portraits of Bishop Berkeley.” Apollo (1982): 76-79.

_____. “Beckett and Berkeley.” Irish University Review (1984): 42-45.

_____. Review of The Guardian, edited by John Calhoun Stephens” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984):

23-26.

_____. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 215-22.

_____. “George Berkeley: Pictures by Goldsmith, Yeats and Luce.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 9-23.

_____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Revolution: 19 November 1707 — 11 January 1708.” History of

European Ideas 7 (1986): 603-8.

_____. “Berkeley’s Siris and the ‘Whiskey Patriots’.” Eighteenth-Century Ireland 1 (1986): 200-

203.

_____. “The Jacobitism of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” Journal of the History of Ideas 47

(1986): 309-19.

_____, ed. George Berkeley. Eighteenth-Century Responses. New York-London: Garland, 1989, 2

vols. In Pitcher (1988-1989).

_____, ed. George Berkeley, Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher: in Focus. New York:

Routledge, 1993.

_____. George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.

_____. Berkeley and Irish Philosophy. London and New York: Continuum, 2005.

_____. “Berkeley’s Life and Works.” In Winkler (2005), 13-33.

_____. “The Distrustful Philosopher: Berkeley between the Devils and the Deep Blue Sea of Faith.”

In Parigi (2010b), 141-57.

_____. “The Birth of Scottish Philosophy from the Golden Age of Irish Philosophy.” Eighteenth-

Century Studies 45 (2012): 379-92.

_____. “Berkeley’s and Hume’s Philosophical Memoirs.” Philosophy Now 120 (June-July 2017):

28-29.

_____ and Ross, Ian Campbell. “George Berkeley and the Authorship of The Memoirs of Signor

Gaudentio di Lucca.” Irish University Review 41 (2011): 196-201.

Bermudez, Jose Luis. “The Adequacy of Simple Ideas in Locke: A Rehabilitation of Berkeley’s

Criticisms.” Locke Newsletter 23 (1992): 347-54.

Bernabei, Andrea. “Il ‘cieco di Molyneux’: un problema di percezione visiva nella Francia

illuminista.” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 30 (1975): 132-66.

Bertini, Daniele, ed. Saggio su una nuova teoria della visione-Trattato sui principi della

conoscenza umana by George Berkeley. Milano: R.C.S., 2004.

_____, ed. Alcifrone by George Berkeley. Milano: R.C.S., 2005.

_____. “Berkeley,” in Enciclopedia filosofica, edited by V. Melchiorre. Milano: Rizzoli, 2006, vol.

II, 1205-13.

_____. “Shaftesbury, Mandeville, Berkeley e il mito del contratto sociale.” Fenomenologia e

Società 29 (2006): 128-45.

_____. “Hume e l’immaterialismo.” Aquinas 49 (2006): 621-35.

_____. Sentire Dio. L’immaterialismo come via per un’interpretazione mistica dell’esperienza.

Assisi: Cittadella Editrice, 2007.

8

______. “Berkeley and Gentile: A Reading of Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Idealistic Studies 37

(2007), 43-50.

______. “Μεστὰ πάντα σημείων: Plotinus, Leibniz, and Berkeley on Determinism.” In Late Antique

Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth, ed. Panayiota Vassilopoulou and Stephen R. L. Clark.

Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 211-27.

______. “Berkeley, Theology, and Bible Scholarship.” In Parigi (2010b), 123-39.

______. “La critica berkeleiana dell’autonomia morale.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 309-

18.

______. “A Case Against the Contemporary Taxonomy of Views on the Metaphysics of Freedom:

Berkeley’s Account of Free Will and Agency.” Dialegesthai (2011). mondodomani.org/

dialegesthai/dbe01.htm.

______. “Ragioni scientifiche e ragioni teologiche nell’ ‘Argument from Design’: il caso di

Berkeley.” Lo Sguardo 6 (2011). www.losguardo.net/public/archivio/ num6/articoli/201106.

%20Daniele_Bertini_Berkeley_Argument_from_Design.pdf.

_____. “George Berkeley.” APhEx: Portale Italiano di Filosofia Analitca 18 (2018): 1-27.

Besedin, Artem P. “Theory of ideas of George Berkeley.” Voprosy Filosofii 9 (2014): 145-55.

_____. “Berkeley on the Natural Laws of Society.” In Charles 2015, 37-52.

_____. “George Berkeley’s Conception of Accountability.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 115-33.

Bettcher, Talia Mae. “Berkeley on Self-Consciousness.” In Daniel, New Interpretations 2007, 179-

202.

_____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Spirit: Consciousness, Ontology and the Elusive Subject. New

York: Continuum Publishing, 2007.

______ Berkeley: a guide for the perplexed. London, New York: Continuum, 2008.

______“Berkeley and Hume on Self and Self-Consciousness.” In Topics in Early Modern

Philosophy of Mind, edited by Jon Miller. Netherlands: Springer (2009), 193-222.

_____. “Abstraction: Berkeley Against Locke.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 135-55.

_____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Mind: Some New Models.” Philosophy Compass 6 (2011): 689-98.

_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mind.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 397-420.

Beyhl, Helmut. Bischof Berkeley, der Mann, der den gesunden Menschenverstand tanzen lässt: das

‘Problem’ des Beweises der Realität der Außenwelt. Ph. D. Diss. University of Berlin, 1990.

Beyssade, Jean-Marie. “L’expérience du rêve et l’extétiorité (de Descartes à Berkeley).” Revue

philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 111 (1986): 355-66.

_____. “Philosophie et apologétique chez Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de

l’étranger (1986): 377-84.

Bird, Graham, ed. A Companion to Kant. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006.

Blackith, Robert. “A Berkeleian Time-Warp.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 1-4.

Blake, J. B. “Addenda to Keynes: a Bibliography of Berkeley.” Bibliographical Society of America

Papers 73 (1979): 337-40.

Blay, Michel. “Deux moments de la critique du calcul infinitésimal: Michel Rolle et George

Berkeley.” Revue d’Histoire des sciences 39 (1983): 223-53.

Blount, Douglas. “Idealism and Science.” In Cowan and Spiegel, 153-64.

9

Bolton, Martha Brandt. “Berkeley’s Objection to Abstract Ideas and Unconceived Objects,” in Sosa

(1987), 61-81.

_____. “Berkeley and Mental Representation: Why Not a Lockean Theory of Ideas?” In Daniel,

New Interpretations (2007), 77-106.

_____. “Belief and Its Objects in Berkeley’s System.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 251-73.

Boman, Eugene C. “Casting Out Beams: Berkeley’s Criticism of the Calculus.” New York State

Mathematics Teachers’ Journal 60 (2010): 9-13.

Bonk, Sigmund. Immaterialismus: Darstellung und Verteidigung von George Berkeleys

Gottesbeweis und immaterialistischem Weltbild. München, 1990.

_____. “George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis.” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und

Religionsphilosophie 36 (1994): 268-83.

_____. “George Berkeleys Nachweis einer gottlichen Vorsehung.” Neue Zeitschrift für

systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 39 (1997): 176-90.

_____. “George Berkeley’s Theory of Time: ‘A-Total-Disaster’.” Studia Leibnitiana 29 (1997):

198-210.

_____. “We see God”: George Berkeley’s Philosophical Theology. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1997.

_____. Abschied von der Anima mundi: die britische Philosophie im Vorfeld der industriellen

Revolution. Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1999.

Boos, William. “Reflective Inquiry and ‘The Fate of Reason’.” Synthese 191 (2014), 4253-4314.

Bordner, S. Seth “Berkeley’s ‘Defense’ of ‘Commonsense’.” Journal of the History of Philosophy

49 (2011): 315-38.

_____. Review of George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment, ed. Silvia

Parigi. Philosophy in Review 32 (2012): 313-15.

_____. “If We Stop Thinking about Berkeley’s Problem of Continuity, Will It Still Exist?” Journal

of the History of Philosophy 55 (2017): 237-60.

_____. “Immaterialism and Common Sense.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 343-54.

_____. “If We Stop Thinking about Berkeley’s Problem of Continuity, Will It Still Exist?” Journal

of the History of Philosophy 55 (2017): 237-60.

Bordwell, Harold. “Make Patriotism Great Again.” Commonweal 143: 20 (12/16/2016): 30.

Borges, Jorge Luis. “Berkeley’s Crossroads.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 5-12.

Botterill, George. “God and First Person in Berkeley.” Philosophy 82 (2007): 87-114.

Bouveresse-Quilliot Renée, ed. Cahiers d’histoire de la philosophie: Berkeley. Bourgogne: Centre

Gaston Bachelard, 2000.

Bowen, Timothy W. Ontological Commitment in George Berkeley and David Lewis: the Role of

Common Sense. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Oxford, 2008.

Boz ovic, Miran. Der grosse Andere: Gotteskonzepte in der Philosophie der Neuzeit. Wien: Turia

und Kant, 1993.

_____; Klun, Branko; and Mervic, Stojan. Vpras anje Boga pri Berkeleyj: diplomska naloga.

Ljubljana: [S. Mervic] (2008).

Bracken, Harry M. “Berkeley: Irish Cartesian.” Philosophical Studies 24 (1976): 39-51.

_____. “Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 11 (1977): 227-45.

10

_____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat Missed [Abstract].”

Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 10.

_____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat Missed.” Hermathena

139 (1985): 63-80.

_____. “On Some Points in Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4

(1987): 435-46.

______. Review of The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Reenchantment by Costica

Bradatan. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 177.

Bradatan, Costica. “Berkeley and Liber Mundi.” Minerva. An Internet Journal of Philosophy 3

(1999), University of Limerick, Ireland.

_____. “Waiting for the eschaton: Berkeley’s ‘Bermuda Scheme’ Between Earthly Paradise and

Educational Utopia.” Utopian Studies 14 (2003): 36-50.

_____. “Philosophy as Palimpsest. In Search for an Immemorial Wisdom.” Existentia: An

International Journal of Philosophy 14 (2004): 337-44.

_____. “ ‘God is Dreaming You’: Narrative as Imitatio Dei in Miguel de Unamuno.” Janus Head: A

Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Continental Philosophy, Literature,

Phenomenological Psychology and the Arts 7 (2004): 453-46.

_____. Review of The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett) by Branka

Arsic.” Philosophy 24 (2004): 237-39.

_____. “‘One is All, and All is One.’ The Great Chain of Being in Berkeley’s Siris.” In O’Gorman

and Donald (2005), 63-82.

_____. “George Berkeley’s ‘Universal Language of Nature’.” In Klaas van Berkel and Vanderjagt

(2005), 71-84.

_____. Introduction to George Berkeley, Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.

New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 2006.

_____. “Rhetoric of Faith and Patterns of Persuasion in Berkeley’s ‘Alciphron’.” Heythrop Journal

47 (2006): 544-61.

______. The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Re-enchantment. New York: Fordham

University Press, 2006.

_____. “George Berkeley e a tradição platônica.” Trans. Jaimir Conte. Princípios: Revista de

Filosofia 16 (2009): 257-84.

_____. and Conte, Jaimir. “A filosofia como palimpsesto: conhecimento arquetípico em Siris.”

Revista Litterarius 3, no. 13 (2014): 1-20.

Bradshaw, D. E. “Berkeley and Hume on Abstraction and Generalization.” History of Philosophy

Quarterly 5 (1988): 11-22.

Brancacci, Aldo. “La teoria platonica delle idee nella ‘Siris’ di Berkeley.” La Cultura: Rivista di

Filosofia e Filologia 54 (2016): 417-33.

Brandt, Reinhard. “Historical Observations on the Genesis of the Three-dimensional Optical

Picture.” Ratio 17 (1975): 176-90.

Braund, Michael J. From inference to affordance: the problem of visual depth-perception in the

optical writings of Descartes, Berkeley, and Gibson. St. Catharines, Ont.: Brock University,

Dept. of Philosophy, 2008.

11

Bravo, Hamdi. “The Problem of Primary and Secondary Qualities in Locke and Berkeley” [in

Turkish]. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences] 5

(2008): 59-80.

Brayton, Alice. George Berkeley in Apulia. Boston: Merrymount, 1946 (republished 2007).

Breidert, Wolfgang. “Corrigendum.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 13.

_____. “Einleitung” to George Berkeley, Drei Dialoge. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1980.

_____. “Die Rezeption Berkeleys in Deutschland im 18 Jahrhundert.” Revue internationale de

philosophie 154 (1985): 223-41.

_____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Fridericana Zeitschrift der Universität Karlsruhe 36

(1985): 3-13.

_____. “On Some Marginal Signs in the Philosophical Commentaries.” Berkeley Newsletter 8

(1985): 7-8.

_____. “With the Infinite God Against the Mathematics of Infinity [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter

8 (1985): 11-12.

_____. “Berkeley’s De Ludo Algebraico and Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 12-14.

_____. “Berkeley’s Kritik an der Infinitesimalrechnung.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1986): 185-91.

_____. “On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germany.” In Sosa (1987), 231-41.

_____, ed., George Berkeley, Versuch über eine Theorie des Sehens und Die Theorie des Sehens ..

verteidigt und erklär. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1987.

_____. Review of Essays on Berkeley, eds. John Foster and Howard Robinson. Archiv für

Geschichte der Philosophie 69 (1987): 315-21.

_____. “Schopenhauer und Berkeley.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 69 (1988): 373-85.

_____. George Berkeley 1685-1753. Basel: Birkhauser, 1989.

_____. “Berkeley, George.” In Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, vol. 2, 1994, col. 260.

_____, Einleitung in George Berkeley, Alciphron oder der Kleine Philosoph. Trans. Luise und

Friedrich Raab; ed. Wolfgang Breidert. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1996.

_____. “Berkeley’s Sources in Mathematics.” In Brykman (1997), 49-58.

_____. “George Berkeley. Philosophie des Immaterialismus.” In Philosophen des 18. Jahrhunderts,

edited by Kreimendahl and Lothar. Darmstadt, 2000, 68-86.

_____. “Berkeley’s Defence of Infinite God in the Contrast to the Infinite in Mathematics.” In

Koetsier and Bergmans (2005), 499-508.

_____. “Berkeley Poeticized.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 214-29.

_____. “Die Ambivalenz von Vorurteilen bei Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 287-

95.

_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 435-57.

Breuninger, Scott Christopher. Morals, the Market, and History: George Berkeley and Social Virtue

in Early Eighteenth-Century Thought. Ph. D. diss., University of Wisconsin, 2002.

_____. “Rationality and Revolution: Rereading Berkeley’s Sermons on Passive Obedience.” New

Hibernia Review 12 (2008): 63-86.

12

_____. Recovering Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context. New York:

Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

_____. “Planting an Asylum for Religion: Berkeley’s Bermuda Scheme and the Transmission of

Virtue in the Eighteenth-Century Atlantic World.” Journal of Religious History 34 (2010):

414-29.

_____. “Improving the Health of the Nation: Berkeley, Virtue, and Ireland.” In Charles 2015, 161-

76.

Brolley, Kevin G. Review of Berkeley by J. O. Urmson. Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 22-23.

Brook, Richard. “Berkeley, Causality and Signification.” International Studies in Philosophy 27

(1995): 15-31.

_____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision, Transparency and Signification.” British Journal for the

History of Philosophy 11(2003): 661-69.

_____. “Berkeley, Bundles, and Immediate Perception.” Dialogue 44 (2005): 493-504.

_____. “Is Geometry about Tangible Extension?” Berkeley Studies 20 (2009): 5-12.

_____. “Non-Conscious Agency and Berkeley’s Theory of Signs.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage

(2011), 287-99.

_____. “Berkeley and Proof in Geometry.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 51 (2012):

419-35.

_____. “Berkeley and the Primary Qualities: Idealization vs. Abstraction.” Philosophia 44 (2016):

1289-1303.

_____. “Berkeley and the Passivity of Ideas.” Iyyun 66 (2017): 59-74.

_____. “De Motu: Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 158-73.

_____. “Berkeley, Newton, Explanation, and Causation.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 21-32.

Brower, Virgil W. “Religion and Repugnance: Empiricism, Political Theology, Projective Disgust.”

In On Taste: Aesthetic Exchanges, ed. Lars Aagaard Mogensen and Jane Forsey. Newcastle

upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2018. Pp. 53-68.

Brown, Michael. “The Biter Bitten: Ireland and the Rude Enlightenment.” Eighteenth-Century

Studies 45 (2012): 393-407.

Brown, Stuart. “Leibniz on Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 13-14.

_____. “Platonic Idealism in Modern Philosophy from Malebranche to Berkeley.” in Cambridge

Platonists in Philosophical Context, eds. G.A.J. Rogers, J.-M. Vienne, and Yves Charles

Zarka. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1997, 197-214.

Brueckner, Anthony. “Idealism and Scepticism.” Theoria 77 (2011): 368-71.

_____. “More on Idealism and Skepticism.” Theoria 80 (2014): 98-99.

Brykman, Geneviève. “Berkeley: sa lecture de Malebranche à travers le Dictionaire de Bayle.”

Revue internationale de philosophie 29 (1975): 496-514.

_____. “Berkeley, lecteur et critique de Spinoza.” Recherches sur le XVIIème Siècle 2 (1978): 173-

92.

_____. “Le cartésianisme dans le De Motu.” Revue internationale de philosophie 3 (1979): 553-69.

_____. “The Close Inspection of Words and Ideas in Berkeley’s Writings.” Berkeley Newsletter 3

(1979): 9-10.

13

_____. “Abstracts of ‘Le Cartesianisme dans le De Motu’ and ‘Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions

abstraites chez Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 15.

_____. “Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley.” Recherches sur le XVIIème siècle 4

(1980): 157-66.

_____. “Berkeley à Newport: 1729-1779.” Recherches sur le XVIIème Siècle 4 (1980): 167-69.

_____. “Berkeley et l’interieur absolu des choses.” Revue philosophique (1980): 421-32.

_____. “Philosophy and Apologetics in Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 12-16.

_____. “Le modèle visuel de la connaissance chez Berkeley.” Revue philosophique (1983): 427-41.

_____. Berkeley: philosophie et apologétique. 2 vols. Lille: Atelier National de reproduction des

thèses. Paris: Vrin, 1984.

_____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 12-

13.

_____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 127-37.

_____. “Principe de ressemblance et hétérogénéité des idées chez Berkeley.” Revue internationale

de philosophie 154 (1985): 242-51.

_____. “L’esprit et les idées visuelles dans la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” History of European

Ideas 7 (1986): 585-91.

_____. “Tricentenaire ‘Berkeley’: (1685-1985).” Revue de synthèse 109 (1988): 148-50.

_____. “Berkeley et l’analogie des noms.” Les Etudes philosophiques 3-4 (1989): 445-54.

_____. “Sensibles communs et sens commun chez Locke et Berkeley.” Revue de métaphysique et

de morale (1991): 515-29.

_____. Review of George Berkeley, De Motu, translated into Italian with an introduction by

Mariapaola Fimiani. Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 17.

_____. Berkeley et le voile des mots. Paris: Vrin, 1993.

_____. “Vision, connaissance et ontologie chez Berkeley.” In Monti (1995), 121-37.

_____, ed., Berkeley et le cartésianisme. Le Temps philosophique 2. Nanterre: Université Paris X-

Nanterre, 1997.

_____, ed. Rassemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme britannique. Le Temps philosophique

6. Nanterre: Département de Philosophie, Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1999.

_____. “Plaisir/douleur et passivité des idées dans l’immaterialisme de Berkeley. ” In Bouveresse-

Quilliot (2000), 15-35.

_____. “L’hétérogénéité des idées sensibles et le ‘langage de la Nature’ chez Locke et Berkeley.” In

Berlioz (2003), 17-46.

_____. “On Human Liberty in Berkeley’s Alciphron VII.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007),

231-46.

_____. “Berkeley, Spinoza and Radical Enlightenment.” In Parigi (2010b), 159-70.

_____. “Courte vue et vision synoptique chez Berkeley.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de

l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 83-95.

_____. “La liberté humaine dans le Dialogue VII de l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz

(2010), 331-40.

14

_____. “La sémantique dans le Dialogue VII.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 407-12.

_____. “Short-Sightedness and Long-Sightedness in Berkeley.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),

195-206.

Bunnin, N. F. The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.

Burnyeat, M. F. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.”

Idealism Past and Present (1982): 19-50.

_____. El idealismo y la filosofia griega: lo que Descartes vio y Berkeley paso por alto, trans. Jesús

Coll Mármol. Oviedo: KRK, 2015.

Bustamante, Rodrigo. “La critica de Berkeley al infinito categorico.” Contrafuerte (1985): 28-34.

Byrne, P. A. “Berkeley, Scientific Realism and Creation.” Religious Studies 20 (1984): 453-64.

Caffentzis, C. George, Über die Ursachen von “The Querist”: Vademecum zu einem irischen

Klassiker der politischen Ökonomie. Düsseldorf: Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen, 1999.

_____. Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money. Dordrecht:

Kluwer, 2000.

_____. “Medical Metaphors and Monetary Strategies in the Political Economy of Locke and

Berkeley.” History of Political Economy 35 (2003: supplement): 204-33.

_____. “Algebraic Money: Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics and Money.” Berkeley Studies

18 (2007): 3-23.

_____. “Locke, Berkeley and Hume as Philosophers of Money. An Apology and Synopsis.” In

Parigi (2010b), 57-71.

_____. “Did Hume Read Berkeley’s The Querist?” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 157-74.

Calazans, Alex. “Considerações a Respeito do Problema do Rigor Matemático em O Analista.”

Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 391-418.

_____. “Um panfleto de Berkeley contra pratica matemàticas de Newton e de Leibniz.” Revista

Latino-Americana de Filosofia e História da Ciência 8 (2010): 623-32.

Callahan, Eugene. “Was Berkeley a Subjective Idealist?” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies

21 (2015): 157-84.

_____. Review of Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World by Kenneth L. Pearce. British

Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (2018): 218-21.

Campagnola, Francesco. “George Berkeley e la teoria dell'analogia divina.” Nouvelles-de-la-

Republique-des-lettres 2 (2006): 25-76.

Campbell, John. “A Straightforward Solution to Berkeley’s Puzzle.” Harvard Review of Philosophy

18 (2012): 31-49.

Campbell, John, and Quassim Cassam. Berkeley’s Puzzle: What Does Experience Teach Us? New

York: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Camporesi, Cristiano. “Aporie berkeleyane.” Rivista di filosofia 73 (1982): 471-73.

Cantor, Geoffrey N. “Berkeley, Reid and the Mathematization of Mid-Eighteenth-Century Optics.”

Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 429-48.

_____. “Two Letters Relating to Berkeley’s Social Circle.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 1-3.

_____. “Berkeley’s The Analyst Revisited.” Isis 75 (1984): 668-83.

15

Carlin, Laurence. “Selecting a Phenomenalism: Leibniz, Berkeley and the Science of Happiness.”

Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (2007): 57-78.

_____. The Empiricists: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York: Continuum, 2009.

_____. “Berkeley and Leibniz.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 254-67.

Casini, Paolo. “Newton’s Principia and the Philosophers of the Enlightenment.” Notes and Records

of the Royal Society of London 42 (1988): 35-52.

Cassam, Quassim. “Tackling Berkeley’s Puzzle.” In Perception, Causation, and Objectivity, eds.

Johannes Roessler, Hemdat Lerman and Naomi Eilan. New York: Oxford University Press,

2011.

Cates, Lynn D. “Berkeley on the Work of the Six Days.” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997): 82-86.

Çetin, Ismail. “The ‘Language Metaphor’ and Its Implications in George Berkeley’s Philosophy.”

Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal of Philosophy] 14 (2010):

123-30.

Chaney, Edward. The Evolution of the Grand Tour since the Renaissance. London: Franck Cass,

1998.

Charles, Sébastien. “L’abbé Raynal, author of an unnoticed review of Berkeley’s Dialogues.”

Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 14-18.

_____. “The Siris in the Age of Enlightenment: Panacea or Imposture?” Hermathena 168 (2000):

55-69.

_____. “Hume and Berkeley in the Prussian Academy: Louis Frederic Ancillon’s ‘Dialogue

between Berkeley and Hume’ of 1796.” Hume Studies 27 (2001): 85-97.

_____. “Ocasionalismo y modernidad: Berkeley, lector critico de Malebranche.” Praxis Filosofica

13 (2001): 27-42.

_____. “Existence et temporalité au Siècle des Lumières: Turgot lecteur de Maupertuis et

Berkeley.” Lumen 21 (2002): 45-59.

_____. Berkeley au siècle des lumières: immatérialisme et scepticisme au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: J.

Vrin, 2003.

_____. “Berkeley occasionaliste malgré lui? De la causalité et de la volonté chez Malebranche et

Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 73-88.

_____, ed., Science et épistémologie selon Berkeley. Saint-Nicolas, Québec: Les Presses

l’Université Laval, 2004.

_____. “Berkeley and the Lumières: Misconception and Reconstruction.” In Daniel, New

Interpretations (2007), 283-309.

______. “Berkeley polémiste: des Sérmons sur l’obéissance passive (1712) aux Maximes sur le

patriotisme (1750)” The European Legacy 13 (2008): 413-24.

_____. “Berkeley et Campailla: recontre infructueuse ou influence probable?” Giornale Critico

della Filosofia Italiana 88 (2009): 25-39.

______. “The Animal According to Berkeley.” In Parigi (2010b), 189-99.

______. “Berkeley et l’imagination.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135

(2010), 97-108.

______. “La réception de l’Alciphron en France au siècle des Lumières.” In Jaffro, Brykman,

Schwartz (2010), 371-79.

16

_____. “Berkeley et Campailla: rencontre infructueuse ou influence probable?” Giornale Critico

della Filosofia Italiana 88 (2009): 25-39.

_____. “Foi, croyance et raison selon Berkeley.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 135-47.

_____. “Matérialisme et immatérialisme dans la pensée anglaise du XVIIIe siècle: Berington versus

Priestley.” Lumen: Selected Proceedings from the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century

Studies 32 (2013): 41-55.

_____. “De Pascal à Locke: la reprise berkeleyenne des enjeux philosophiques concernant la

tolerance religieuse et civile.” In Charles (2015), 177-90.

_____, ed. Berkeley Revisited: Moral, Social and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Voltaire

Foundation, 2015.

_____. “The Reception of Berkeley in Eighteenth-Century France.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017),

334-42.

Chibeni, Silvio Seno. “As posições de Newton, Locke e Berkeley sobre a natureza da gravitação.”

Scientiae Studia 11 (2013): 811-39.

Cicekdagi, Caner. “Esse Est Percipi in Berkeley’s Book Three Dialogues between Hylas and

Philonous.” Kaygi: Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal of

Philosophy] 10 (2008): 115-26.

Chibeni, Silvio Seno. “Berkeley: Uma física sem causas eficientes.” Cadernos de Historia e

Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 357-90.

_____. “Berkeley e o papel das hipóteses na filosofia natural Berkeley and the role of hypothesis in

natural philosophy.” Scientiae Studia 8 (2010): 389-419.

_____. “As posições de Newton, Locke e Berkeley sobre a natureza da gravitação.” Scientiae

Studia 11 (2013): 811-39.

Chinn, Ewing Y. “The anti-abstractionism of Dignana and Berkeley.” Philosophy East and West 44

(1994): 55-77.

Chiurazzi, G. “Il problema della mediazione nella filosofia di George Berkeley.” Filosofia 49

(1998): 53-75.

Clark, Stephen R. L., Money, Obedience, and Affection: Essays on Berkeley’s Moral and Political

Thought. New York: Garland, 1989.

_____. “Berkeley on Religion.” In Winkler (2005), 369-404.

Clarke, Desmond M. George Berkeley: Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press, 2008.

Clarke, Desmond M. and Wilson, Catherine, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early

Modern Europe. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Clasen, Uwe. Die Sehtheorien von René Descartes und George Berkeley im Spiegel der Geschichte

der physiologischen Optik. Aachen: Tecn. Hochsch. Diss., 1997.

Collingridge, D. G. “Berkeley on Space, Sight and Touch.” Philosophy 53 (1978): 102-105.

Conley, Patrick T. Rhode Island’s Founders: from Settlement to Statehood. Charleston, SC: History

Press, 2010.

Conroy, Graham P. “George Berkeley and the Jacobite Heresy: Some Comments on Irish Augustan

Politics.” Albion 3 (1971): 82.

17

Consiglio, Francesco. “Introducción al concepto de idea en la filosofía de George Berkeley.”

Disputatio: Philosophical Research Bulletin 5 (2016): 283-96.

Conte, Jaimir. “A Oposição de Berkeley ao Ceticismo.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da

Ciencia 18 (2008): 325-55.

_____. “Uma visita a glândula pineal.” Revista Litterarius 15 (2016): 1-8.

_____. “Sobre a imortalidade.” Revista Litterarius 17 (2018): 1-7.

Cope, Kevin L. “Moral Travel and the Pursuit of Nothing: Vathek and Siris as Philosophical

Monologue.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 18 (1988): 167-86.

Copenhaver, Rebecca. “Berkeley on the Language of Nature and the Objects of Vision.” Res

Philosophica 91 (2014): 29-46.

Coutinho, Maurício C. “Os Escritos Econômicos de Berkeley.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da

Ciencia 18 (2008): 293-324.

Cover, J. A. Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hacket, 1990.

Cowan, Steven B. “What Is that Stone? Idealism and Particulars.” In Cowan and Spiegel (2016),

51-70.

Cowan, Steven B. and Spiegel, James S., eds. Idealism and Christian Philosophy, vol. 2: Idealism

and Christianity. New York: Bloomsbury, 2016.

Cowan, Steven B. and Spiegel, James S. “Introduction.” In Cowan and Spiegel (2016), 1-10.

Coxito, Amandio Augusto. “Un texto de Luis A. Vernei contra o imaterialismo de Berkeley.”

Revista Filosofia de Coimbra 6 (1997): 101-17.

Crain, Steven D. “Must a Classical Theist Be an Immaterialist?” Religious Studies 33 (1997): 81-

92.

Creery, Walter E., ed., George Berkeley: Critical Assessments. 3 vols. London; New York:

Routledge, 1991.

Crombie, Alistair C. George Berkeley Bicentenary. New York: Garland, 1988.

Cross, C. B. “Berkeley on Other Minds.” Auslegung 6 (1978): 45-50.

Cummins, Phillip and Zoeller, Guenter, eds. Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of

Representation in Modern Philosophy. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing

Company, 1992.

_____. “Berkeley’s Ideas of Sense.” Nous 9 (1975): 55-72.

_____. “Berkeley’s Unstable Ontology.” Modern Schoolman 67 (1989): 15-32.

_____. “Sections Nine and Ten of Berkeley’s Principles.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 1-5.

_____. “Berkeley on Minds and Agency.” In Winkler (2005), 190-229.

_____.”Perceiving and Berkeley’s Theory of Substance.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007),

121-52.

Curtin, Thomas. “Divine Analogy in Eighteenth-Century Irish Philosophy.” Journal of Theological

Studies 65 (2014): 600-624.

Curtis, Benjamin L. “A New Look at Berkeley’s Idealism.” Heythrop Journal 50 (2009), 189-94.

D’Agostino, Simone. Review of Berkeley’s ‘A Treatise concerning the Principles of Human

Knowledge: An Introduction by Peter J. E. Kail. Gregorianium 97 (2016): 205-206.

18

_____. Review of Berkeley by Daniel E. Flage. Gregorianum 97 (2016): 422-24.

Danaher, James P. “Is Berkeley’s World a Divine Language?” Modern Theology 18 (2002): 361-73.

Dancy, Jonathan. Berkeley: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.

_____, ed., George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Oxford:

Oxford University Press, 1998.

_____, ed., George Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous. Oxford: Oxford

University Press, 2003.

_____. “Berkeley, Descartes and the Science of Nature.” Harvard Review of Philosophy 20 (2014):

4-16.

Daniel, Stephen H. “George Berkeley, Francis Suarez, and the Esse-Existere Distinction.” American

Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2000): 621-36.

_____. “The Ramist Context of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of

Philosophy 9 (2001): 487-505.

_____. “Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist Logic.” Idealistic Studies 31 (2001): 55-72.

_____. “Berkeley’s Pantheistic Discourse.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49

(2001): 179-94.

_____. “Berkeley’s Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas.” Journal of the History

of Philosophy 39 (2001): 239-58.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials, ed. C. J.

McCracken and I. C. Tipton. Philosophy in Review 21 (2001), 362–64.

_____. “Les limites de la philosophie naturelle de Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 163-70.

_____. “Berkeley’s Stoic Notion of Spiritual Substance.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007),

203-30.

_____ “The Harmony of the Leibniz-Berkeley Juxtaposition.” In Leibniz and the English Speaking

World, ed. Stuart Brown and Pauline Phemister. New York: Springer/Kluwer (2007), 163-

80.

_____, ed. New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought. Journal of the History of Philosophy Books

Series. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2007.

_____, ed. Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007.

_____. Review of A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley by John R.

Roberts. Berkeley Studies 18 (2007), 36–39.

_____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Treatment of Representation.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 25

(2008): 41-55.

_____. Review of The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Reenchantment by Costica Bradatan,

The Scriblerian 41 (2009), 232–33.

_____. Review of George Berkeley: Philosophical Writings, ed. Desmond M. Clarke. Notre Dame

Philosophical Reviews, 2009.07.19. http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=16645.

_____. “How Berkeley’s Works Are Interpreted.” In Parigi (2010b), 3-14.

_____. “Berkeley and Spinoza.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010),

123-34.

_____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Divine Analogy.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 149-61.

19

_____. “Stoicism in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 121-34.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Alciphron: English Text and Essays in Interpretation, eds. Laurent

Jaffro, Geneviève Brykman, and Claire Schwartz. British Journal for the History of

Philosophy 19 (2011): 563-66.

_____. “How Berkeley Redefines Substance.” Berkeley Studies 24 (2013): 40-50.

_____. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Mind and the ‘Black List Hypothesis’: A Dialogue.” Southern

Journal of Philosophy 51 (2013): 24-41.

_____. “Berkeley, Hobbes, and the Constitution of the Self.” In Charles (2015), 69-81.

_____. “Berkeley on God’s Knowledge of Pain.” In Storrie (2018a), 136-45.

_____. “Berkeley’s Non-Cartesian Notion of Spiritual Substance.” Journal of the History of

Philosophy 56 (2018), 659–82.

_____. “Substance and Person: Berkeley on Descartes and Locke.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74, #4

(2018), 7–20.

Daniel, Stephen, and Charles, Sébastien. “Montréal Conference Summaries.” Berkeley Studies 23

(2012): 54-57.

Darren, Hynes. “Berkeley’s Corpuscular Philosophy of Time.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 22

(2005): 339-56.

Darwall, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Moral and Political Philosophy.” In Winkler (2005), 311-38.

Dávid, B. “Berkeley kartezianizmusa és az önismeret két modellje” [Hungarian]. Magyar Filozofiai

Szemle 57, no. 3 (2013): 30-49.

Davis, John W. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (1960): 392-408.

Dea, Shannon. “Peirce and Spinoza’s Pragmaticist Metaphysics.” Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia 15

(2014): 25-35.

De Almeida Marques, José Oscar. “Berkeley e o Problema de Barrow.” Cadernos de Historia e

Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 419-45.

Dégremont, Roselyne. Berkeley. L’idée de nature. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1995.

_____. Berkeley. Paris: Ellipses, 1999.

_____. “Le principe de la morale.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010),

45-56.

_____. Leçons sur la philosophie de George Berkeley. Paris: Ellipses, 2013.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Common Sense and Science by Marek Tomeček. Revue Philosophique

de la France et de l’Ėtranger 141 (2016): 395.

Dempsey, Liam P. “Newtonian Idealism: Matter, Perception, and the Divine Will.” Southern

Journal of Philosophy 52 (2014): 86-112.

DePoe, John M. “Berkeley’s Master Argument for Idealism.” In Just the Arguments, eds. Michael

Bruce and Steven Barbone. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, 68-69.

_____. “Berkeleyan Idealism, Christianity, and the Problem of Evil.” Philosophia Christi 19

(2017): 401-413.

De Waal, Cornelis. “The Real Issue Between Nominalism and Realism: Peirce and Berkeley

Reconsidered.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996): 425-33.

20

______. “Having an Idea of Matter: A Peircean Refutation of Berkeleyan Immaterialism.” Journal

of the History of Ideas 67 (2006): 291-313.

Diana, Rosario. “Disappartenenza dell’Io. Berkeley e Beckett.” Bollettino del Centro di Studi

Vichiani 41 (2011): 55-70.

_____. Esse est percipi: George Berkeley e Film di Samuel Beckett. Teatro-reading filosofico.

Milano: Mimesis Edizioni, 2017.

Dicker, Georges. “Two Arguments from Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Dialogues Between

Hylas and Philonous.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (1982): 409-22.

_____. “Berkeley on the Immediate Perception of Objects.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 201-

13.

_____. “Berkeley on Immediate Perception: Once More Unto the Breach.” Philosophical Quarterly

56 (2006): 517-35.

______. “Anti-Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 335-50.

_____. Berkeley’s Idealism: A Critical Examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

_____. “Berkeley on the Impossibility of Abstracting Primary From Secondary Qualities.” Southern

Journal of Philosophy 39 (2012): 23-45.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism by Samuel C. Rickless. Mind 122 (2013):

1183-87.

_____. “Berkeley’s Critique of Locke’s Theory of Perception.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 268-

87.

Di Michele, Stefano. “George Berkeley in America: nostalgia del vedere.” Annali della Facolta di

Lettere e Filosofia 39 (1996): 141-63.

Doney, Willis. “Is Berkeley’s a Cartesian Mind?” In Turbayne (1982), 273-82.

_____. “Berkeley’s Argument Against Abstract Ideas.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1983):

295-308.

_____. Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas. New York: Garland, 1989.

Dooren, W. Van. “Whether There Be Any Reason Why Berkeley Is So Often Misunderstood?”

Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappijen en wetenschap 26 (1985-86).

Dougherty, Jude P. Review of Berkeley by Daniel E. Flage. Review of Metaphysics 69 (2016): 625-

26.

Downing, Lisa J. “Berkeley’s Case Against Realism About Dynamics.” In Muehlmann (1995), 197-

216.

_____. “Siris and the Scope of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” British Journal for the History of

Philosophy 3 (1995): 279-300.

_____. “Berkeley’s Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Science.” In Winkler (2005), 230-65.

_____. “Occasionalism and Strict Mechanism: Malebranche, Berkeley, Fontenelle.” In Mercer and

O’Neill (2005), 206-30.

_____. “Sensible Qualities and Secondary Qualities in the First Dialogue.” In Storrie (2018a), 7-23.

Drebushenko, D. “Abstraction and a New Argument for the Esse-Is-Percipi Thesis.” Hermathena

167 (1999): 35-58.

21

Drunga, Mykolas. “Berkeley and the Time-Gap Argument.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 55-

75.

D’Souza, Paul. “Salvation in Non-Christian Religions: Aristotle and Berkeley. Philosophical

Contribution to a Theological Question.” Divyadaan 16 (2005): 17-32.

Dubois, Pierre. L’oeuvre de Berkeley. Paris: Vrin, 1985.

Dunlop, Katherine. “The Role of Visual Language in Berkeley’s Account of Generality.”

Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 83 (2011): 525-59.

Dunn, John; Urmson, J. O; and Ayer, A. J. The British Empiricists: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford:

Oxford Univeristy Press, 1992.

Dupas, Jean-Claude. “Le visible et l’invisibile chez Berkeley.” Études irlandaises (1986): 45-56.

Eagleton, Terry. “What you see is what you get.” Review of The Correspondence of George

Berkeley, ed. Marc Hight. London Review of Books 35, no. 8 (4/25/2013): 31-32.

Easton, Patricia A., ed., Logic and the Workings of the Mind. Atascadero: Eastview, 1997.

Eaton, Jeffrey C. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and the Scientific Promise of the Christian Doctrine of

Creation.” Harvard Theological Review 80 (1987): 431-47.

Eberwein, Robert. “Samuel Johnson, George Cheyne, and the ‘Cone of Being’.” Journal of the

History of Ideas 36 (1975): 153-58.

Echeverri Saldarriaga, Santiago. “‘Subjetividad’ e ‘immaterialismo’en la filosofia de George

Berkeley.” Revista colombiana de filosofia de la ciencia 3 (2002): 179-208; republished in

Estudios de filosofia 27 (2003): 127-48.

Egan, Frances. “The Moon Illusion.” Philosophy of Science 65 (1998): 604-23.

Eisenstein, G. “Berkeley’s Presence: Metaphysical Development and Dialectical Tension.”

Idealistic Studies 18 (1988): 207-29.

El-Bizri, Nader. “A Philosophical Perspective on Alhazen’s Optics.” Arabic Sciences and

Philosophy 15 (2005): 189-218.

Emundts, Dina. “Kant’s Critique of Berkeley’s Concept of Objectivity.” In Kant and the Early

Moderns ed. Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse. Princeton: Princeton University

Press, 2008, 117-41.

Enright, J. T. “The Moon Illusion Examined from a New Point of View.” Proceedings of the

American Philosophical Society 119 (1975): 87-107.

Eric, Dietrich. “The Bishop and Priest: Toward a Point-of-View Based Epistemology of True

Contradictions.” Logos Architekton. Journal of Logic and Philosophy of Science 2 (2008):

35-58.

Esenyel, Adnan. “Idealism and Kant’s Conception of Space” (in Turkish). Kaygi: Uludag

Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi (Uludag University Journal of Philosophy) 17 (2011): 149-62.

Evans, J. D. G. “Berkeley on Conceiving the Unconceived.” Irish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1985):

79-93.

Everitt, Nicholas. “Quasi-Berkelyan Idealism as Perspicuous Theism.” Faith and Philosophy 14

(1997): 353-77.

Falkenstein, Lorne. “Intuition and Construction in Berkeley’s Account of Physical Space.” Journal

of the History of Philosophy 32 (1994): 63-84.

22

_____. “Classical Empiricism.” In Companion to the Philosophy of Time, eds. Heather Dyke and

Adrian Bardon. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. Pp. 102-19.

_____. “Theories of Perception: Berkeley and his Recent Predecesors.” In Routledge Companion to

Eighteenth Century Philosophy, ed. Aaron Garrett. New York: Routledge, 2014.

_____. “Reid’s Critique of Berkeley’s Position on the Inverted Image.” Journal of Scottish

Philosophy 16 (2018): 175-91.

Fârcaş, Daniel. “L’idéalisme ‘visuel’: Maître Eckhart et George Berkeley.” Studia Universitatis

Babes-Bolyai, Theologia Catholica 57 (2012): 5-24.

Faris, J. A. Review of Berkeley: Critical and Interpretative Essays, ed. C. M. Turbayne. Berkeley

Newsletter 7 (1984): 26-32.

Farris, Joshua R.; Hamilton, S. Mark; and Spiegel, James S., eds. Idealism and Christian Theology,

vol. 1. New York: Bloomsbury, 2016.

Fasko, Manuel. “A Scotist nonetheless? George Berkeley, Cajetan and the Problem of Divine

Attributes.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 33-50.

Fau, Martina. Berkeleys Theorie der visuellen Sprache Gottes: ihre Bedeutung für die Philosophie

des Immaterialismus und ihre historischen Würzeln. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1993.

Fauske, Christopher J. “A Most Unlikely Friendship? Jonathan Swift, George Berkeley, and the

Bonds of Philosophy with, Perhaps, an Answer to an Age-Old Problem.” Swift Studies 25

(2010): 146-62.

Fedriga, Riccardo. “Oggetti e aspetti intenzionali nella teoria dell’astrazione di George Berkeley.”

Dianoia: Annali di Storia della Filosofia 15 (2010): 147-66.

Fennema, Scott. “George Berkeley and Jonathan Edwards on Idealism: Considering an Old

Question in Light of New Evidence.” Intellectual History Review 29 (2019): 265-90.

Feuer, Lewis F. “Materialism, Idealism and Science.” Philosophy of Science 15 (1948): 71-75.

Fimiani, Mariapaola. George Berkeley: il nome e l’immagine. Cosenza: Lerici, 1979.

Fields, Keota. Berkeley: Ideas, Immaterialism, and Objective Presence. Lanham: Lexington Books,

2011.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism by Samuel Rickless. Philosophical Quarterly

64 (2014): 170-72.

_____. “Berkeley and Hume on the Imagination.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 314-33.

_____. “Berkeley’s Semiotic Idealism.” In Storrie (2018a), 61-83.

Fincham, R. M. “Transcendental Idealism and the Problem of the External World.” Journal of the

History of Philosophy 49 (2011): 221- 41.

Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley’s Notions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (1985):

407-25, reprinted in George Berkeley: Critical Assessments, edited by Walter E. Creery,

London and New York: Routledge (1991), 404-24.

_____.“Berkeley on Abstraction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 483-501;

reprinted in Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas, edited by Willis Doney, in The

Philosophy of George Berkeley Series, New York: Garland (1988).

_____. Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions: a Reconstruction Based on his Theory of Meaning. London:

Croom Helm, 1987.

_____. “Relative Ideas and Notions.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 235-53.

23

_____. “Berkeley, Individuation and Physical Objects.” In Barber and Gracia (1994), 133-54.

_____. “George Berkeley.” In The Encyclopedia of Empiricism, edited by Don Garrett and Edward

Barbanell. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press (1997), 44-55.

_____. “Berkeley’s Archetypes.” Hermathena 171 (2001): 7-31.

_____. “Berkeley’s Principles, Section 10.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2003): 543-

51.

_____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Principles.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34

(2004): 25-60.

_____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006). http://www.

utm.edu/research/iep/b/berkeley.htm.

_____. “Berkeley’s Ideas of Reflection.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006): 7-13.

_____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Three Dialogues.” In Daniel (2008), 45-75.

_____. “Was Berkeley and Ethical Egoist?” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008): 3-18.

_____. “Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 361-72.

_____. “Remarks on Professor Grandi’s Comments.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 379-80.

_____. “Analysis in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 35-53.

_____. Berkeley. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2014.

_____. “Can Berkeley Have It Both Ways?” The Philosophers’ Magazine 66, no. 3 (2014): 55-60.

_____. “Ethics in Alciphron.” In Charles 2015, 53-68.

_____. “Is Berkeley’s God Omnipotent?” Review of Metaphysics 71 (2018): 703-21.

_____. “Rickless and Passive Obedience.” Berkeley Studies 28 (2019): 23–47.

Fleming, N. “Berkeley and Idealism.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 300-325.

_________. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Principles.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34

(2004): 25-60.

__________.“Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Three Dialogues.” In Daniel, New

Interpretations (2007): 47-75.

Fleming, Patrick. “Berkeley’s Immaterialist Account of Action.” Journal of the History of

Philosophy 44 (2006): 415-29.

Flew, Anthony. “Was Berkeley a Precursor of Wittgenstein?” In Berman (1993), 214-26.

Fogelin, Robert. “Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite Divisibility.” Philosophical Review

97 (1988): 47-69.

_____. “The Intuitive Basis of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13

(1996): 331-44.

_____. Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge,

2001.

Forest, Denis. “Language visuel, communication universelle.” Revue philosophique de la France et

de l’étranger 4 (1997): 429-46.

Foster, John and Robinson, Howard, eds., Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration.

Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.

24

Fourny-Etchegaray, Claire. “Note sur les rapports entre raison et sens commun chez Stillingfleet et

Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 357-60.

________. “Les diverses conceptions du sens commun et de son role dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro,

Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 393-405.

Fox, Christopher. “Locke and the Scriblerians: the Discussion of Identity in Early Eighteenth

Century England.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 16 (1982): 1-25.

Frangiotti, Marco Antonio. “Transcendental Idealism and Phenomenalism.” Critica 26 (1994): 73-

95.

Frankel, Henry. “Berkeley’s Concept of Mind as Presented in Book II of the Principles.” Southern

Journal of Philosophy 15 (1977): 37-51.

Frankel, Melissa. “Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley,

Meaning, and Minds.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 381-402.

_____. “Berkeley, Meaning and Minds: Remarks on Glezakos’ Comments.” Philosophia 37 (2009),

409-413.

_____. “Berkeley and God in the Quad.” Philosophy Compass 7 (2012): 388-96.

_____. Review of Berkeley: Ideas, Immaterialism, and Objective Presence by Keota Fields.

Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 46-50.

_____. “Acts, Ideas, and Objects in Berkeley’s Metaphysics.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43

(2013): 475-93.

_____. “Revisiting Berkeley’s Perceptual Relativity Argument.” History of Philosophy Quarterly

30 (2013): 161-76.

_____. Review of Berkeley by Daniel E. Flage. Berkeley Studies 25 (2014): 16-19.

_____. “Actions, Behaviours and Volitions in Berkeley’s Moral Philosophy.” In Charles (2015),

99-114.

_____. “Berkeley on the ‘Twofold State of Things’.” International Journal for Philosophy of

Religion 80 (2016): 43-60.

_____. “The Cartesian Roots of Berkeley’s Account of Sensation.” Southern Journal of Philosophy

55 (2017): 214-31.

_____. Review of Language and the Structure of Berkeley's World by Kenneth L. Pearce. Notre

Dame Philosophical Reviews, https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/language-and-the-structure-of-

berkeleys-world/, 2017.12.14.

Frederick, Danny. “The Good Bishop and the Explanation of Political Authority.” De Ethica: A

Journal of Philosophical, Theological and Applied Ethics 3, no. 2 (2016): 23-35.

Frederick, R. “Berkeley and the Argument from Conceiving.” Philosophy Research Archives 13

(1987/88): 481-87.

Frey, Christopher. Review of Berkeley's Puzzle: What Does Experience Teach Us? by John

Campbell and Quassim Cassam. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, http://ndpr.nd.edu/

news/berkeley-s-puzzle-what-does-experience-teach-us/, 2015.07.24.

Friedman, Lesley. “Pragmatism: the Unformulated Method of Bishop Berkeley.” Journal of the

History of Philosophy 41 (2003): 81-96.

Fugate, Courtney David. “Berkeley’s Aesthetic of Transcendence.” Yearbook of the Irish

Philosophical Society 2005: 92-117.

25

Furlong, E. J. “A Berkeleian Nod?” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 3.

_____. “Some Puzzles in Berkeley’s Writings.” Hermathena 120 (1976): 63-73.

_____. and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and The Ladies Library.” Berkeley Newsletter 4

(1980): 4-13.

Ganson, Todd; and Ganson, Dorit. “Everyday Thinking about Bodily Sensations.” Australasian

Journal of Philosophy 88 (2010), 523-34.

Garber, Daniel, and Ayers, Michael R., eds. The Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century

Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

________, and Longuenesse, Béatrice (eds.). Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University

Press (2008).

Garcia Varas, Ana. “Ideas e imagenes: un estudio de la teoria de las ideas abstractas en Hume.”

Revista de Filosofia 66 (2010): 93-106.

Garrett, Aaron. Berkeley's Three dialogues: a reader's guide. New York: Continuum, 2008.

Garrett, Don. “Hey, What’s the Big Idea? Berkeley and Hume on Extension, Local Conjunction,

and the Immateriality of the Soul.” In Storrie (2018a), 191-204.

Gatti, Andrea, Inglesi a Napoli nel viceregno austriaco: Joseph Addison, Lord Shaftesbury, George

Berkeley. Napoli: Vivarium/Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2000.

_____, and Pugliese Carratelli, G. “Per una storia intellettuale dell'eta Augustea in Inghilterra: Il

Catalogue della biblioteca di Joseph Addison.” Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei.

Rendiconti Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 14 (2003): 224-39.

Gaukroger, Stephen, ed. The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991.

Gaustad, Edwin S. “George Berkeley and the New World Community.” Church History 48 (1979):

5-17.

_____. George Berkeley in America. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1979.

_____. “When in the Course.” William and Mary Quarterly 52 (1995): 479-82.

Gerbier, Laurent. “Le dialogisme de Berkeley: Lecture comparée du Traité des principes (1710) et

des Trois dialogues entre Hylas et Philonous (1713).” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale

39 (2003): 397-409.

Gersh, Stephen and Moran, Dermot, eds., Eriugena, Berkeley and the Idealist Tradition. Notre

Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006.

Ghosh, Kuntal and Bhaumik, Kamales. “Complexity in human perception of brightness: a historical

review on the evolution of the philosophy of visual perception.” OnLine Journal of

Biological Sciences 10 (2010): 17-35.

Gibson, Ann and Palmer, Lucia. “George Berkeley’s Visual Language and the New England

Portrait Tradition.” Centennial Review 31 (1987): 122-45.

Gilgulin, Robert; and Kerr, Kristine. “Letters to the Editor: Berkeley’s Clouds of Dust.” Philosophy

Now 107 (Apr/May 2015), 40-41.

Girard, Jeremy. “La bonne société d’après Berkeley: entre education religieuse et coutume

raisonnable.” In Charles 2015, 227-42.

Giménez, Diego; and Rolandone, Roberto. “Borges y Pessoa: lectores de Berkeley.” Variaciones

Borges 40 (2015): 23-39.

26

Girten, Kristin M. “Mingling with Matter: Tactile Microscopy and the Philosophic Mind in

Brobdingnag and Beyond.” Eighteenth Century: Theory & Interpretation 54 (2013): 497-

520.

Glasson, Travis. “‘Baptism doth not bestow Freedom’: Missionary Anglicanism, Slavery, and the

Yorke-Talbot Opinion, 1701-30.” William & Mary Quarterly 67 (2010): 279-318.

Glauser, Richard. “Les rélations de significance chez Berkeley.” Studia Philosophica 42 (1983):

165-200.

_____. “Berkeley, Collier, et la distinction entre l’esprit fini et le corps.” In Brykman (1997), 91-

116.

_____. Berkeley et les philosophes du XVIIe siècle: perception et scepticisme. Sprimont: Mardaga,

1999.

_____. “La structure de la perception médiate dans la théorie berkeleyenne de la vision.” in Berlioz

(2003), 103-34.

_____. “The Problem of the Unity of a Physical Object in Berkeley.” In Daniel, Reexamining

Berkeley (2007), 50-81.

_____. “Optique géométrique, images rétiniennes et corpuscules chez Berkeley.” Revue

Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 7-18.

_____. “Berkeley on the Numerical Identity of What Several Immediately Perceive: Three

Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous III 247–8.” Philosophy Compass 7 (2012): 517-30.

_____. “Immediate and Mediate Perception in Berkeley.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 355-84.

Glenney, Brian. “Adam Smith and the Problem of the External World.” Journal of Scottish

Philosophy 9 (2011): 205-23.

Glezakos, Stavroula. “Comments on Melissa Frankel’s ‘Something-We-Know-Not-What,

Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meaning and Minds’.” Philosophia 37 (2009),

403-407.

Glombíček, Petr; and Hill, James. George Berkeley: pruvodce jeho filosofii. Praha: Filosofia, 2009.

Glouberman, Mark. “Abstraction and Determinacy: the Ideological Background of Berkeleianism.”

Idealistic Studies (1982): 14-34.

_____. “Consciousness and Cognition: from Descartes to Berkeley.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1982):

244-65.

_____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism: a Reply to Moked.” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical

Quarterly 40 (1991): 315-18.

_____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 2 (1994):

145-63.

Goldschmidt, Tyron and Stapleford, Scott. Berkeley’s ‘Principles’: Expanded and Explained. New

York: Routledge, 2016.

Gordon-Roth, Jessica. “Tracing Reid’s ‘Brave Officer’ Objection Back to Berkeley—And Beyond.”

Berkeley Studies 28 (2019): 3–23.

Gorham, Geoffrey. “Early American Immaterialism: Samuel Johnson’s Emendations of

Berk”Bloomsbury companioneley.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54

(2018): 441-56.

Gottenbarn, Donald. “Berkeley: God’s Pain.” Philosophical Studies 28 (1975): 245-54.

27

Gozzano, Simone. “Mental Images and Their Ontology.” Epistemologia 17 (1994): 225-52.

Graham, Jody. “Common Sense and Berkeley’s Perception by Suggestion.” International Journal

of Philosophical Studies 5 (1997): 397-423.

Grandi, Giovanni Battista. “Comments on Daniel E. Flage’s ‘Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.’”

Philosophia 37 (2009), 373-78.

_____. “Distance and Direction in Reid’s Theory of Vision.” Topoi: An International Review of

Philosophy 35 (2016): 465-78.

Granja, Dulce Maria. “Realismo et idealismo en Berkeley.” Contrafuerte (1985): 19-27.

Gray, J. “Berkeley’s Theory of Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (1978): 415-34.

Grayling, Anthony C. Berkeley: the Central Arguments. London: Duckworth, 1986.

_____. “Berkeley’s Argument for Immaterialism.” In Winkler (2005), 166-89.

Greco, John. “Reid’s Critique of Berkeley and Hume: What’s the Big Idea?” Philosophy and

Phenomenological Research 55 (1995): 279-96.

Greenberg, A. R. “Reid, Berkeley, and Notional Knowledge.” Monist 61 (1978): 415-34.

Groza, Adam. “Idealism and the Nature of God.” In Cowan and Spiegel (2016), 107-26.

Gruner, Rolf. “Berkeley on General Ideas.” Dialogue 8 (1969): 481-85.

Grush, Rick. “Berkeley and the Spatiality of Vision.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45

(2007): 413-42.

Grzeliński, Adam. “The Berkeleyan Conception of Nature.” Вісник Національного авіаційного

університету. Філософія. Культурологія" Збірник наукових праць. Київ 2 #12 (2010):

13-20.

_____. Człowiek i duch nieskończony. Immaterializm George’a Berkeleya [The Man and the Infinite

Spirit: The Immaterialism of George Berkeley]. Toruń, Poland: Nicolaus Copernicus

University Press, 2010.

_____, ed. and trans. Próba stworzenia nowej teorii widzenia i inne eseje filozoficzne [Polish

translation of A New Theory of Vision and other Philosophical Essays by George Berkeley].

Toruń, Poland: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press, 2011.

_____. “Status przestrzeni w filozofii Berkeleya.” Spory o realism (2014): 189-214.

_____. “Berkeley’s Understanding of Beauty and His Polemic with Shaftesbury.” In Charles 2015,

209-26.

_____. “Alciphron; or the Minute Philosopher: Berkeley’s Redefinition of Free-Thinking.” In

Belfrage and Brook (2017), 174-95.

Guérineau, Roselyne. “Berkeley et les Bermudes.” Revue philosophique de la France et de

l’étranger (1986): 309-17.

Gurczyński, Jacek. “Dwa Typy Racjonalności—Berkeley I Newton.” Rocznik Filozoficzny

Ignatianum 19 (2013): 7-18.

Gustafsson, Martin. “Berkeley at Vesuvius.” Wittgenstein Studien 4 (2013): 27-44.

Gutiérrez, Pedro Stepanenko. “La conception berkeleyana del yo.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 13-

22.

Gylling, Heta Aleksandra. “Berkeley as a Worldly Philosopher.” In Charles 2015, 23-36.

28

Hall, Richard A. S. “Did Berkeley Influence Edwards: Their Common Critique of the Moral Sense

Theory,” in Jonathan Edwards’s Writings, ed. Stephen J. Stein. Bloomington: Indiana

University Press, 1996, 100-121.

Hall, Roland. “ ‘New Words in Berkeley’s Writings.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 4-8.

Hamou, Philippe. “Sens et fonction de modèle linguistique dans la Nouvelle Théorie de la vision.”

In Berlioz (2003), 47-78.

_____. “Microscopes et minima visuels. Berkeley critique de l’autopsie instrumentale.” In Charles

(2004), 103-26.

_____. “L'optique des Voyages de Gulliver.” Revue d'histoire des sciences 60 (2007): 25-45.

Hanczewski, Paweł. “George Berkeley: Forging the Irish Nation.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018):

135-49.

Hanson, Norwood Russell. “The Dematerialization of Matter.” Philosophy of Science 29 (1962):

27-38.

Hanratty, Gerald. “A Voice in the Wilderness: Berkeley’s Response to Enlightenment.” Neue

Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 32 (1990): 319-37.

Hara, Kira. “Depth and Distance in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” History of Philosophy Quarterly

21 (2004): 101-17.

Hardwick, Charles. Berkeley and Peirce, Graduate Studies Texas Tech. University (1981), 81-85.

Harman, Graham. “Realism without Materialism.” Substance: A Review of Theory & Literary

Criticism 40 (2011): 52-72.

Harris, James. “Berkeley on the Inward Evidence of Freedom.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz

(2010), 341-50.

Harris, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Argument from Perceptual Relativity.” History of Philosophy

Quarterly 14 (1997): 99-120.

Hatfield, Gary. “The Cognitive Faculties.” In Garber (1998), 953-1002.

Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David. “A New Approach to Berkeley’s Ideal Reality.” In

Muehlmann (1995), 47-66.

_____ and _____. “On Allaire’s ‘Another Visit’.” In Muehlmann (1995), 39-46.

_____ and _____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Dilemma: Beyond the Incoherence Model.” History of

Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996): 221-38.

Hausman, David B. Descartes’s Legacy: Minds and Meaning in Early Modern Philosophy.

Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.

Häyry, Matti. “Passive Obedience and Berkeley’s Moral Philosophy.” Berkeley Studies 23 (2012):

3-14.

Hayry, Matti and Hayry, Hetta. “Obedience to Rules and Berkeley’s Theological Utilitarianism.”

Utilitas 6 (1994): 233-42.

Hendrix, John; Williams, Roger; Carman, Charles H. Renaissance Theories of Vision. Aldershot:

Ashgate, 2010.

Henkel, Jeremy E. “How to Avoid Solipsism While Remaining an Idealist: Lessons From Berkeley

and Dharmakīrti.” Comparative Philosophy 3 (2011): 58-73.

Henze, D. F. “Descartes vs. Berkeley: a Study in Early Modern Metaphilosophy.” Metaphilosophy

8 (1977): 147-63.

29

Hernández-Castro, Gustavo. “La teoría del conocimiento de Berkeley: empirismo y colonialidad.”

Revista Espiga 16 (2017): 93-106.

Hestevold, H. S. “Berkeley’s Theory of Time.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990): 179-92.

Hibbs, Darren. “John Scottus Eriugena on the Composition of Material Bodies.” British Journal for

the History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 385-93.

Hight, Marc A. “Why We Do Not See What We Feel.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002):

148-62.

_____. “Defending Berkeley’s Divine Ideas.” Philosophia 33 (2005): 97-128.

_____. “Berkeley's Half-Way House.” Philosophy Compass 1(2006): 28-35.

_____. “Berkeley and Bodily Resurrection.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007): 443-

58.

_____. “Why My Chair is Not Merely A Congeries: Berkeley and the Single Idea Thesis.” In

Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 82-107.

_____. Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. University Park: Penn

State University Press, 2008.

_____. “New Berkeley Correspondence: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 21 (2010), 16-21.

_____. “Berkeley’s Metaphysical Instrumentalism.” In Parigi (2010b), 15-29.

_____. “How Immaterialism Can Save Your Soul.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de

l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 109-22.

_____. “Berkeley on the Difference between Brutes and Men.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),

207-22.

_____. “Preserving the Torments of Hell: Berkeleian Immaterialism and the Afterlife.” Science et

Esprit 63 (2011): 179-92.

_____, ed. The Correspondence of George Berkeley. Cambridge: University Press, 2013.

_____. Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. State College, PA:

Pennsylvania State University, 2013.

_____. “Berkeley on Economic Bubbles.” In Charles 2015, 191-208.

_____. “Idealism, Miracles, and the Laws of Nature.” In Cowan and Spiegel 2016, 165-86.

_____. “Berkeley’s Correspondence.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 49-62.

Hight, Marc, and Bohannon, Joshua. “The Son More Visible: Immaterialism and the Incarnation.”

Modern Theology 26 (2010): 120-48.

Hight, Marc, and Ott, Walter. “The New Berkeley.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 1-

24.

Hill, James. “The Synthesis of Empiricism and Innatism in Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions.”

Berkeley Studies 21 (2010), 3-15.

_____. “The Active Self and Perception in Berkeley’s Three Dialogues. In Storrie (2018a), 123-35.

Hill, Jonathan. “Gregory of Nyssa, Material Substance and Berkeleyan Idealism.” British Journal

for the History of Philosophy 17 (2009): 653–83.

_____. “Berkeley’s Missing Argument: The Sceptical Attack on Intentionality.” British Journal for

the History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 47-77.

30

Hochschild, Joshua P. “George Berkeley and a Theory of Analogy.” The Downside Review 122

(2004): 157-68.

Hocutt, Max. “George Berkeley Resurrected: A Commentary on Baum’s ‘Ontology for Behavior

Analysis’.” Behavior and Philosophy 46 (2018): 47-57.

Hoffmann, Yoel. “ ‘Dream-World’ Philosophers: Berkeley and Vasubandhu.” Philosophy East-

Philosophy West (1978): 247-68.

Holden, Thomas. “Berkeley on Inconceivability and Impossibility.” Philosophy and

Phenomenological Research 98 (2019): 107-122.

Hollingshead, G. “Bishop Berkeley and the Gloomy Clerk: Pope’s Final Satire on Deism.” Durham

University Journal (1982): 19-27.

_____. “Berkeley, Blackwell, and Blackwell’s Homer.” Scottish Literary Journal 11 (1984): 20-35.

_____. “Pope, Berkeley, and the True Key to the Dunciad in Four Books.” English Studies in

Canada 10 (1984): 141-55.

_____. “The Case for Berkeley’s Authorship of The Vanity of Philosophical Systems.” Eighteenth-

Century Life 9 (1985): 51-64.

_____. “Sources for the Ladies’ Library.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 1-9.

Holtzman, Matthew. “Berkeley on Common Sense, Theology, and Matter.” Ph.D. dissertation:

Johns Hopkins University, 2010.

_____. “Berkeley’s Two Panaceas.” Intellectual History Review 21 (2011): 473-95.

_____. Review of Berkeley et la chimie: Une philosophie pour la chimie au XVIIIe siècle by Luc

Peterschmitt. Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 40-45.

Hone, Joseph M. Bishop Berkeley: His Life, Writings, and Philosophy. London: Faber & Faber,

1931.

Houghton, Raymond. “International Berkeley Society.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 14-15.

Howell, T. J. “The Bond of Society: Berkeley’s Theory of Social Reality.” Berkeley Newsletter 3

(1979): 16.

Huggler, Jørgen. “The Response to George Berkeley’s Philosophy in Twentieth-Century Danish

Experimental Psychology: Edgar Rubin and Edgar Tranekjaer Rasmussen.” Danish

Yearbook of Philosophy 51 (2018): 47-70.

Hughes, M. “Hermes and Berkeley.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1992): 1-19.

Hunter, Hugh. “Berkeley on Doing Good and Meaning Well.” In Charles 2015, 131-46.

_____. “George Berkeley’s proof for the existence of God.” International Journal for Philosophy of

Religion 78 (2015): 183-93.

_____. “Berkeley’s Suitcase.” Philosophy Now 117 (Dec 2016/Jan 2017): 6-9.

_____. “Malebranche, Berkeley and the Path to Idealism.” Science et Esprit: Revue de philosophie

et de théologie 70 (2018): 41-50.

Hurley, Michael. “Berkeley and Methodism: a New Letter.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 1-2.

Ibañez, Alejandro Herrera. “La nocion de existencia en la ontologia de Berkeley.” Analisis

Filosofico 6 (1986): 13-22.

Ichinose, Masaki. “Berkeley on Practical Spirit.” Philosophical Studies 14 (1995): 1-17.

Iglesias Huelga, Luis Alfonso. Berkeley: el empirista ingenioso. Barcelona: Batiscafo, 2015.

31

Ilodigwe, Damian. Berkeley: A Portrait. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2010.

Imamoglu, Tuncay. Bir Tanrı kanıtlaması olarak Berkeley idealizmi. Istanbul : Iz Yayıncılık, 2014.

Imlay, Robert A. “Berkeley and Scepticism: a Fatal Dalliance.” Hume Studies 18 (1992): 501-10.

_____. “Berkeley and Action.” In Muehlmann (1995), 171-82.

Istvan, Michael A. “The Link Between Berkeley’s Refutation of Abstraction and His Refutation of

Materialism.” Methodus 6 (2011): 78-105.

Isermann, Michael M. “George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and the Occult Tradition of

Linguistic Platonism. Part II: George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and Linguistic

Platonism.” Language & Communication 28 (2008): 57.

Jacob, Alexander. “The Neoplatonic Conception of Nature in More, Cudworth and Berkeley.” In

Gaukroger (1991), 101-121.

Jacovides, Michael. “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive.” Philosophia 37 (2009):

415-29.

_____. “Remarks on Smalligan Marušić’s Comments.”Philosophia 37 (2009): 437-39.

Jacquette, Dale. “Berkeley’s Continuity Argument for the Existence of God.” Journal of Religion

65 (1985): 1-14.

_____. “Reconciling Berkeley’s Microscopes in God’s Infinite Mind.” Religious Studies 29 (1993):

453-63.

_____. Review of A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley by John R.

Roberts. Faith and Philosophy 28 (2011): 468-72.

_____. Jacquette, Dale. “Newton’s Metaphysics of Space as God’s Emanative Effect.” Physics in

Perspective 16 (2014): 344-70.

Jaffro, Laurent. “Sensation et imagination. Berkeley et la ‘différence perçue’.” In Ressemblances et

dissemblances dans l’empirisme britannique, dir. G. Brykman, université Paris 10-Nanterre,

Le Temps philosophique 6 (1999), 71-91.

_____. “La paideia selon Berkeley et Shaftesbury. Un conflit dans la conception thérapeutique de la

philosophie.” In La philosophie comme médecine de l’âme à l’âge classique, dir. G.

Brykman, Université Paris 10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 9 (2003), 147-73.

_____. “Le cogito de Berkeley.” Archives de philosophie 67 (2004): 85-111.

_____. “Berkeley’s Criticism of Shaftesbury’s Moral Theory in Alciphron III.” In Daniel,

Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 199-213.

_____. “L’évidence de l’existence d’autrui est-elle un modèle pour la connaissance de Dieu?

Berkeley, Hume, Reid, et l' ‘argument irrégulier.’” HAL – CCSD (2010).

_____. “Ėducation moderne et tradition antique selon Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz

(2010), 277-86.

_____. “Ist die Evidenz der Existenz des Anderen ein Modell für die Gotteserkenntnis? Berkeley,

Hume, Reid und das ‘Argument des Irregulären’.” Aufklärung: Interdisziplinäres Jahrbuch

zur Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts und seiner Wirkungsgeschichte 21 (2009): 51-74.

Jaffro, Laurent; Brykman, Geneviève; Schwartz, Claire, eds. Berkeley’s Alciphron. English Text

and Essays in Interpretation. Hildesheim: Olms, 2010.

_____. “ ‘Reid said the business, but Berkeley did it.’ Ferrier interprète de l’immatérialisme.” Revue

Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 135-49.

32

Jakapi, Roomet. Berkeley, Mysteries, and Meaning: a Critique of the Non-Cognitivist

Interpretation. Ph. D. diss., University of Tartu. Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2002.

_____. “Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.” British Journal for

the History of Philosophy 10 (2002): 401-11.

_____. “Faith, Truth, Revelation and Meaning in Berkeley’s Defence of the Christian Religion (in

Alciphron).” The Modern Schoolman 80 (2002): 23-34.

_____. “Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and ‘Non-Cognitive’ Propositions in

Scripture.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2003): 86-90.

_____. “Was Berkeley a Utilitarian?” In Lemetti and Piirimäe (2007), 53-68.

_____. “Berkeley and the Separate State of the Soul: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 18 (2007): 24-28.

_____. “Christian Mysteries and Berkeley’s Alleged Non-Cognitivism.” In Daniel, Reexamining

Berkeley (2007): 188-98.

_____. “Berkeley’s Defence of the Scripture in Alciphron VI.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz

(2010), 353-56.

_____. “George Berkeley.” In Early Modern Philosophy of Religion [2009], ed. Graham Oppy and

N. N. Trakakis. New York: Routledge, 2014. Pp. 183-96.

Jankowiak, Tim. “Kantian Phenomenalism without Berkeleyan Idealism.” Kantian Review 22

(2017): 205-231.

Jennings, Gavan. Berkeley’s Theory of Radical Dependence. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge

Scholars Publishing, 2018.

Jennings, Roger. “The Fourth Dialogue Between Hylas and Philonous.” Philosophy Now 105

(Nov/Dec 2014): 32-35.

Jesseph, Douglas M., ed., George Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst. A Modern Edition with

Introductions and Commentary. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academy, 1992.

_____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

_____. “Berkeley, God, and Explanation.” In Mercer and O’Neill (2005), 183-206.

_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Winkler (2005), 266-310.

_____. “Faith and Fluxions: Berkeley on Theology and Mathematics.” In Daniel, New

Interpretations (2007), 247-60.

Jessop, T. E. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.” Journal of Theological

Studies 9 (1958): 197-98.

Jolley, Nicholas. “Berkeley and Malebranche on Causality and Volition.” In Cover (1990), 227-44.

______. “Berkeley, Malebranche, and Vision in God.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34

(1996): 535-48.

_____. Causality and Mind: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press,

2013.

Jones, Nick. Starting with Berkeley. London: Continuum, 2009.

Jones, Tom. Pope and Berkeley: the Language of Poetry and Philosophy. Houndmills, Basingstoke:

Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

______. “George Berkeley and Thomas Secker: A Note.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006): 14-19.

33

_____. Review of ‘We Irish’ in Europe: Yeats, Berkeley & Joseph Hone by W. J. McCormack.

Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 51-53.

_____. Review of The Correspondence of George Berkeley, ed. Marc Hight. Berkeley Studies 24

(2013): 112-15.

_____. “George Berkeley’s Biography.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 5-20.

Jonik, Michael. “Mind and Matter in Early America: The Berkeley-Johnson Correspondence.”

Pluralist 11 (2016): 39-48.

Kabitoglou, E, Douka. “On the Discrimination of Platonisms in Eighteenth Century England.”

Philosophical Inquiry 15 (1993): 20-45.

Kail, P. J. E. “Berkeley, the Ends of Language, and the Principles of Human Knowledge.”

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (2009): 265-78.

_____. “Causation, Fictionalism and Non-Cognitivism: Berkeley and Hume.” In Parigi (2010b), 31-

40.

_____. “Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Epistemology.” In Epistemology: The Key Thinkers, ed. Stephen

Hetherington. London: Continuum, 2012. Pp. 111-30.

_____. Berkeley’s ‘Treatise concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge’: An Introduction.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Kamio, Mitsuo. “The Semantics of Perception: A Romantic Phrase of the Consciousness.” Journal

of the School of Letters 4 (2008): 13-35.

Karásek, Jindrich. “Mind and the Other [in Czech].” Filosoficky Casopis 57 (2009), 61-69.

_____. “Problémy s Idealismem” [in Czech]. Reflexe 49 (2015): 3-24.

Kasam, A. “Can Berkeley Be Called an Imagist?” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1989): 75-88.

Kassavine, Illia. “Berkeley Revisited: on the New Metaphysics for Social Epistemology. 90 Years

after Materialism and Empiriocriticism.” Epistemologia 19 (1996): 157-74.

Katz, Mikhail G; and Sherry, David. “Leibniz’s Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern

Implementations, and Their Foes from Berkeley to Russell and Beyond.” Erkenntnis 78

(2013): 571-625.

Kearney, John. “Thought, Language and Meaning in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” The New

Scholasticism 49 (1975): 480-94.

Kearney, Richard. “Berkeley and the Irish Mind.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25.

Keefe, Jenny. “The Return to Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2007),

101-13.

Kelly, Patrick. “Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist [Abstract].”

Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14.

_____. “Berkeley and Money: Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist.”

Hermathena 139 (1985): 101-16.

_____. “Berkeley and Ireland.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25.

_____. “Berkeley’s Servants.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 13-14.

_____. “Berkeley’s Economic Writings.” In Winkler (2005), 339-68.

_____. “Berkeley’s Querist: ‘Hints . . . What Is to be Done in this Critical State of Our Affairs’ or

Proposals for a Hyperborean Eutopia?” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 196-215.

34

Kendrick, Nancy. Review of New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought, ed. Stephen H. Daniel.

Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2009): 471-72.

_____. “The ‘Empty Amusement’ of Willing: Berkeley on Agent Causation.” Berkeley Studies 25

(2014): 3-15.

_____. “Berkeley’s Bermuda Project and The Ladies Library.” In Charles 2015, 243-58.

_____. “Berkeley’s Bermuda Project in Context.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 21-48.

Kennedy, Máire. “Reading the Enlightenment.in Eighteenth-Century Ireland.” Eighteenth-Century

Studies 45 (2012): 355-78.

Keynes, Geoffrey. “Samuel Johnson and Bishop Berkeley.” The Book Collector (1981): 177-81.

Kijaczko, Stanislaw. Immaterializm: epistemologia I metafizyka: próba interpretacij filozofii

George’a Berkeleya. Opole: Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2002.

Kingston, F. Temple. The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753: Irish Philosopher.

Lewiston: Mellen, 1992.

Klaas van Berkel, Klaas and Vanderjagt, Arjo, eds., The Book of Nature in Modern Times. Leuven:

Peeters Publishers, 2005.

Klein, Lawrence E. “Berkeley, Shaftesbury and the Meaning of Politeness.” Studies in Eighteenth-

Century Culture 16 (1986): 57-68.

Klemme, Heiner F. “Causality.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, ed.

Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, vol. 1, 368-88.

_____. “Substances and Modes, Space and Time.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-

Century Philosophy, ed, Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006,

vol. 1, 343-67.

Kline, David A. “Berkeley’s Theory of Common Sense.” International Studies in Philosophy 19

(1987): 21-31.

_____. “Berkeley’s Divine Language Argument.” In Berman (1993), 185-99.

Koetsier, Teun and Bergmans, Luc, eds., Mathematics and the Divine. A Historical Study.

Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.

Kohlenberg, Philip. “Bishop Berkeley on Religion and the Church.” Harvard Theological Review

66 (1973): 219-36.

Kohler Ryan, Renee. “De profundis clamavi ad te Domine: The Existential Significance of Depth

for Berkeley, Merleau-Ponty and Desmond.” Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society

2005: 237-53.

Kopper, Joachim. Das Unbezügliche als Offenbarsein: Besinnung auf das philosophische Denken.

Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004.

Kovár, Martin. “Was Berkeley Really an Immaterialist?” Studia Philosophica 61 (2014): 77-90.

Krisztian, Pete. “George Berkeley: Immaterializmussal a Jozan Eszert.” Korunk 8 (2019): 34-40.

Kroustallis, Basileios. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21

(2004): 151-66.

Ksenjek, Ekaterina Y. and Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley, the Author of Nature, and the Judeo-

Christian God.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (2012): 281-300.

Kucharski, Dariusz. “‘Common Sense’ as an Argument for the Berkeleyan Immaterialistic Thesis”

[in Polish]. Studia Philosophiae Christianae 48 (2012): 49-63.

35

Kulenkampff, Arend. George Berkeley. München: Beck, 1987.

_____. Esse est percipi. Untersuchungen zur Philosophie George Berkeleys. Basel: Schwabe, 2001.

Kupfer, Joseph. “Universalization in Berkeley’s Rule-Utilitarianism.” Revue internationale de

philosophie 28 (1974): 511-31.

Kuznetsova, Irina. “Utpaladeva’s Conception of Self in the Context of the Ᾱtmavāda-Anātmavada

Debate and in Comparison with Western Theological Idealism. Philosophy East &

West 62 (2012): 339-58.

Lambert, Richard. “Berkeley’s Use of the Relativity Argument.” Idealistic Studies (1980): 107-21.

_____. “The Literal Intent of Berkeley’s Dialogues.” Philosophy and Literature 6 (1982): 165-70.

Lamers, Robert. “Berkeley and Schopenhauer.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (1981): 120-43.

Leary, David E. “Berkeley’s Social Theory: Context and Development.” Journal of the History of

Ideas 38 (1977): 635-49.

Lebrun, G. “Berkeley ou le sceptique malgré lui.” Manuscrito 11 (1988): 33-48.

Leduc-Fayette, Denise. “Qu’est-ce que ‘parler aux yuex’? Berkeley et le ‘langage optique’.” Revue

philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 4 (1997): 409-27.

Lee, R. N. “What Berkeley’s Notions Are.” Idealistic Studies 20 (1990): 19-41.

Lee, Sukjae. “Berkeley on the Activity of Spirits.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20

(2012): 539-76.

_____. “Berkeley on Continuous Creation: Occasionalism Contained.” In Storrie (2018a), 106-122.

Lees, Daniel E. “Berkeley Redux: Imagination as Ethical Power in Shelley’s ‘Mont Blanc’.” Texas

Studies in Literature and Language 58 (2016): 278-304.

Le Jallé, Ėléonore. “Mandeville dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 297-308.

Lema Hincapié, Andrés. “Berkeley y su inmaterialismo ontológico: Elementos básicos.” Dialogos:

Revista del Departmento de Filosofia Universidad de Puerto Rico 44 (2012): 141-65.

Lemetti, Juhana and Piirimäe, Eva, eds. Human Nature as the Basis of Morality and Society in

Early Modern Philosophy. Acta Philosophica Fennica 83. Helsinki: Philosophical Society of

Finland, 2007.

Lennon, Thomas M. “Berkeley and the Ineffable.” Syntheses 75 (1988): 231-50.

_____. “George Berkeley and the Act-Object Distinction.” Dialogue 40 (2001): 651-67.

_____. “The Significance of the Barrovian Case”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science

38 (2007): 36-55.

_____. “The Genesis of Berkeley's Theory of Vision Vindicated” History of European Ideas 33

(2007), 321-29.

____. “The Historical Consistency of Berkeley’s Idealism.” British Journal for the History of

Philosophy 16 (2008): 101-24.

_____. “The Main Part and Pillar of Berkeley’s Theory: Idealism and Perceptual Heterogeneity.”

Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011): 91-115.

Lavine, Michael. “How to Make a Mistake.” Philosophia 22 (1993): 29-37.

Levin, David Michael, ed. Sites of Vision. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, 1997.

36

Levin, Janet. “Molyneux Meets Euthyphro: Does Cross-Modal Transfer Require Rational

Transition?” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2008): 289-97.

Levin, Yakir. “Idealism and Relativism: Locke, Berkeley, Kant, and Wittgenstein” [in Hebrew].

Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2010): 128-42.

Levine, James. “Prior, Berkeley, and the Barcan Formula.” Synthese 193 (2016): 3551-65.

Levine, Michael. “Berkeley’s Theocentric Mentalism: Pantheism?” Sophia (1987): 30-41.

_____ and Levi, Neil. “Robinson on Berkeley: ‘Bad Faith’ or Naive Idealism?” Idealistic Studies 22

(1992): 163-78.

Levy, David M. “Bishop Berkeley Exorcises the Infinite: Fuzzy Consequences of Strict Finitism.”

Hume Studies 18 (1992): 511-36.

_____. “ ‘Magic Buffalo’ and Berkeley’s ‘Theory of Vision’: Learning in Society.” Hume Studies

19 (1993): 223-26.

Leyvraz, Jean-Pierre. “La notion de Dieu chex Berkeley.” Revue de theologie et de philosophie

(1980): 241-52.

Lievers, Menno. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (1992): 399-

416.

Linford, Daniel J. “Early–Modern Irreligion and Theological Analogy: A Response to Gavin

Hyman’s A Short History of Atheism.” Secularism and Nonreligion 5, no. 3 (2016): 1-8.

Livesey, James. Reviews of The Correspondence of George Berkeley, ed. Marc Hight; and

Recovering Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context by Scott

Breuninger. Modern Intellectual History 12 (2015): 453-73.

Llamas-Gómez, Clara Isabel. “Introduction to ‘Berkeley’s Crossroads’.” Berkeley Newsletter 14

(1995/96): 1-4.

Lloyd, Peter B. Consciousness and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London: Ursa, 1999.

_____. Paranormal Phenomena and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London: Ursa, 1999.

Loaiza, Juan R. “Molyneux’s Question in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” Theoria: Revista de Teoría,

Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 32 (2017): 231-47.

Long, A. A. “What is the Matter with Matter, According to Plotinus?” Royal Institute of Philosophy

Supplement 78 (2016): 37-54.

López, Alberto Luis. Acerca de la divinidad. Investigación sobre la función de Dios en la filosofía

de George Berkeley. Ph.D. Diss., UNAM, Mexico, 2013.

_____. “Berkeley: el origen de la crítica a los infinitesimales.” Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía

41 (2014): 195-217.

_____. Review of The Correspondence of George Berkeley ed. by Marc Hight. Dianoia 59 (2014):

185-88.

_____. “Berkeley: la concepción de Dios en los Comentarios Filosóficos.” Endoxa 36 (2015): 123-

44.

_____. “Berkeley: el papel de Dios en la teoría de la visión.” Tópicos revista de Filosofía 49

(2015): 27-52.

_____. “Lenguaje, materia y dios: Un estudio sobre los ‘Dialogues’ de George Berkeley.” Estudios

Filosoficos 64 (2015): 213-33.

37

_____. Review of Berkeley revisited: moral, social and political philosophy, ed. Sébastien Charles.

International Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2016), 512-14.

_____. Review of Berkeley by Daniel E. Flage. Signos Filosóficos 18 (2016): 198-202.

_____. “La influencia de Locke en el deísmo y su repercusión en Berkeley.” In Las bases de la

modernidad: John Locke, edited by Luis Antonio Velasco Guzmán. Ciudad de México, MX:

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2016. Pp. 21-44.

_____. “Berkeley: Sobre el conocimiento nocional de la mente.” Contrastes: Revista Internacional

de Filosofía 22 (2017): 137-54.

_____. “Respuesta al comentario de David Camilo Téllez Guzmán: ‘Berkeley: el papel de Dios en

la teoría de la visión’.” Ideas Y Valores 66 (2017): 409-412.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía 57 (2019): 465-72.

Lord, S. K. “Berkeleian Linguistics.” Linguistics 213 (1978): 5-28.

Louet, D. “La critique de l’absolutisme newtonien chez Leibniz et Berkeley.” Revue de

métaphysique et de morale 93 (1988): 447-68.

Lowe, E. J. Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action. New York: Oxford University

Press, 2008.

Lucash, Frank S. “The Nature of Mind.” Giornale di Metafisica 13 (1991): 89-107.

Luce, A. A. “Berkeley and the Living Thing.” Hermathena 123 (1977): 19-25.

Luce, J. V. “Yale College and the Acquisition of Whitehall.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 19-

22.

Luebering, J. E. “Authors of the Enlightenment: 1660 to 1800.” In The Britannica Guide to

Authors. New York: Britannica Educational, 2014.

Lutterfelds, Wilhelm. “Kant oder Berkeley? Zum aktuellen Streit um den korrecten Realismus.”

Perspektiven der Philosophie 22 (1996): 305-40.

Lyons, William. “Dysart Castle: George Berkeley’s Childhood Home.” Berkeley Newsletter 12

(1991/92): 11-15.

Mack, Ruth. “The limits of the senses in Johnson’s Scotland.” Eighteenth Century: Theory and

Interpretation 54 (2013): 279-94.

Mahon, James Edwin. Review of The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy by Peter Walmsley.

Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 15-17.

Maia Neto, José R. “Academic Skepticism in Early Modern Philosophy.” Journal of the History of

Ideas 58 (1997): 199-220.

Malherbe, Michel. “Husserl critique de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de

l’étranger (1986): 355-66.

Malherbe, Michel. “La critique husserlienne des idées abstraites selon Berkeley.” History of

European Ideas 7 (1986): 623-32.

Mall, Ram Adhar. Der operative Begriff des Geistes: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Freiburg, Breisgau:

Alber, 1984.

Mancino, Michele. “Il Mezzogiorno nei diari (1717) del ‘Viaggio in Italia’ di George Berkeley.” In

Atti delle giornate di studio: Il turismo culturale in Campania. Napoli, Quaderni

dell’Università degli studi “Federico II”, 2004, 271-304.

38

Mandal, Nathaniel. Idee und Intention. Die Ideen- beziehungsweise Bedeutungstheorie John Lockes

und ihre Wiederbelebung in der Theorie der Sprecherbedeutung bei Paul Grice. Munich:

Grin Verlag, 2010.

_____. Qualitäten der Wahrnehmung. Lockes Unterscheidung zwischen Qualitäten primärer und

sekundärer Art und Berkeleys Immaterialismuseinwand. Munich: Grin Verlag, 2010.

Marciano, Bruno. George Berkeley. Estetica e idealismo. Genova: Nova Scripta, 2010.

_____. “Il rapporto estetico con la natura nella filosofia di Berkeley” Rivista di Estetica 54 (2014):

247-70.

Markwart, Anna Markwart, and Szymańska, Marta. “O zmysłach i postrzeganiu–czyli czego nie

wiemy o Berkeleyu, a dowiadujemy się od Smitha i vice versa.” Filo-Sofija 12 (2012): 147-

154.

_____. “Dobro jednostki dobrem społeczeństwa czy dobro społeczeństwa dobrem jednostki?

George Berkeley i Adam Smith o postrzeganiu i moralności” (Polish). [“The Good of the

Individual as the Good of Society, or the Good of Society as the Good of the Individual?

George Berkeley and Adam Smith on Perception and Morality.”] Etyka 46 (2013), 21-34.

Martin, Jorge L. Introducción, traducción y notas adicionales to Siris: Empirismo e idealismo

platónico en el siglo XVII [includes Spanish translation of Berkeley’s Siris]. Buenos Aires:

Miño y Dávila, 2009.

Martinello, Francesco. “Direzioni del moto e direzioni nello spazio: Berkeley e Kant.” Rivista di

Filosofia 102 (2011): 105-23.

Marušić, Jennifer Smalligan. “Berkeley on the Objects of Perception.” In Storrie (2018a), 40-60.

Mathauser, Zdenek. “The Theory of Reflection in Aesthetics and the Heritage of George Berkeley.”

(in Czechoslovakian), Estetika 11 (1974): 30-52.

Mattey, G. J. “Kant’s Conception of Berkeley’s Idealism.” Kantstudien 74 (1983): 161-75.

McCracken, Charles J. “What Does Berkeley’s God See in the Quad?” Archiv für Geschichte der

Philosophie 61 (1979): 280-92.

_____. Malebranche and British Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.

_____. “Berkeley’s Conception of Idea [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14-16.

_____. “Berkeley’s Notion of Spirit.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 597-602.

_____. “Stages on a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24

(1986): 19-40.

_____. “Berkeley’s Cartesian Concept of Mind: the Return Through Malebranche and Locke to

Descartes.” Monist 71 (1988): 596-611.

_____. “Berkeley on the Relation of Ideas to the Mind.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 187-200.

_____. “Godless Immaterialism: on Atherton’s Berkeley.” In Muehlmann (1995), 249-60.

_____. “Demons that Deceive, Gods that Perceive, and the Limits of Skepticism.” In Brykman

(1997), 73-89.

_____. “Knowledge of the Existence of Bodies.” In Garber (1998), 624-48.

_____. “George Berkeley.” In Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Steven Nadler. Oxford:

Blackwell, 2002, 437-55.

_____. “Berkeley’s Realism.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 23-44.

39

_____ and Tipton, Ian, eds., Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

_____. “Leibniz and Berkeley on Body.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 175-92.

_____. “Berkeley and Descartes.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 247-53.

_____. “Berkeley and Malebranche.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 288-98.

McDonough, Jeffrey K. “Berkeley, Human Agency and Divine Concurrentism.” Journal of the

History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 567-90.

_____. “Berkeley on Ordinary Objects.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 385-96.

McGlynn, Conor. “An Intuitionistic Defence of Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Analysis 79 (2019):

236-42.

McGowan, William. “The Dream of Ezra Stiles: Bishop Berkeley’s Haunting of New England.”

Studies in Eighteenth- Century Culture (1982): 181-98.

McGowan, William. “Did Berkeley Write The Irish Blasters?” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 1-

4.

_____. “George Berkeley’s American Declaration of Independence.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century

Culture 12 (1983): 105-13.

_____. “Berkeley Kicking His Own Stones.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1989): 81-102.

McIntyre, J. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.” Scottish Journal of

Theology 15 (1962): 420-23.

McKim, Robert. “Wenz on Abstract Ideas and Christian Neoplatonism in Berkeley.” Journal of the

History of Ideas (1982): 665-71.

_____. “The Entries in Berkeley’s Notebooks: a Reply to Bertil Belfrage.” Hermathena 139 (1985):

156-61.

_____. “Luce’s Account of the Development of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Journal of the History

of Ideas 48 (1987): 649-69.

_____. Review of Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs. Modern Philosophy by Theodore

Young. Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 13-16.

_____. “What Is Berkeley’s God Doing in the Quad?” Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987/88):

637-53.

_____. Review of Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley, ed. Ernest Sosa. Berkeley

Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 28-32.

_____. “Berkeley on Private Ideas and Public Objects.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 215-33.

_____. “Abstraction and Immaterialism: Recent Interpretations.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98):

1-13.

_____. “Berkeley’s Notebooks.” In Winkler (2005), 63-93.

McKinnon, Rhys. “Dismantling the Straw Man: An Analysis of the Arguments of Hume and

Berkeley Against Locke’s Doctrine of Abstract Ideas.” Sorites: An International Electronic

Magazine of Analytical Philosophy. 16 (2005), 38-45.

McRae, Robert. “’Idea’ as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century.” Journal of the

History of Ideas 26 (1965): 175-90.

Meattini, Valerio. “Berkeley e l’Italia.” Critica storica 19 (1982): 3-21.

40

Mel’vil’, I. K. And Sushko, S. A. “Argument Doktora Dzhonsona: Semiuel Dzhonson kak kritik

Berkli.” Voprosy Filosofii 3 (1981): 133-44.

Menichelli, Caterina. “Was Berkeley A Spinozist? A Historiographical Answer (1718-1751).” In

Parigi (2010b), 171-88.

Mensch, Jennifer. “Kant and the Problem of Idealism: On the Significance of the Göttingen

Review.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2006): 297-317.

Mercer, Christia and O’Neill, Eileen, eds. Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and

Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Michael, M. A. “Berkeley’s puzzle: what does experience teach us?” Choice: Current Reviews for

Academic Libraries 52 (2015): 2026.

Migely, Geneviève. “Berkeley’s Actively Passive Mind.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007),

153-71.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism by Samuel C. Rickless. Philosophy in Review

34 (2014): 333-35.

Millar, Alan. “Berkeley’s Puzzle.” Analysis 77 (2017): 232-42.

Mirarchi, L. A. “Force and Absolute Motion in Berkeley’s Philosophy of Physics.” Journal of the

History of Ideas 38 (1977): 705-13.

_____. “A Rejoinder to Bruce Silver’s Reply.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 716-18.

Moked, Gabriel. Particles and Ideas: Berkeley’s Corpuscularian Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford

University Press, 1988.

Moked, Gabriel. “A Note on Berkeley’s Anti-Abstractionism.” Iyyun 40 (1991): 95-99.

_____. “Two Central Issues in Bishop Berkeley’s ‘Corpuscularian Philosophy’ in the Siris.”

History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 643-49.

Montero, B. H. “La realidad en Kant y Berkeley.” Revista de Filosofia de la Universidad de Costa

Rica 23 (1985): 49-69.

Monti, Maria Teresa. “Theories ‘providentialistes’ de la vision. Chirurgiens et philosophes entre

Berkeley et Molyneux.” in Wissenschaften und Musik unter dem Einfluß einer sich

ändernden Geisteshaltung, edited by M. Büttner. Bochum: Universitätsverlag N.

Brockmeyer, 1992, 69-76.

_____. “’Scrittura’ e ‘commento’: il codice berkeleiano della percezione. Problemi medici e teorie

filosofiche.” In L’interpretazione nei secoli XVI e XVII , edited by Guido Canziani and

Yves-Charles Zarka. Milano: F. Angeli, 1993, 387-406.

_____, ed., Teorie della visione e problemi di percezione visiva nell’età moderna. Milano: Franco

Angeli, 1995.

_____. “Isomorphisme, signes naturals et “prophéties”: les suggestions de Descartes et les solutions

de Berkeley.” In Brykman (1997), 117-48.

Montluzin, Emily Lorraine de. “Attributions of Authorship in the Gentleman’s Magazine, 1731-36:

A Supplement to the Union List.” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and

Reviews 21 (2008): 11-24.

Mooney, Timothy. “Irish Cartesian and Proto-Phenomenologist: The Case of Berkeley.” Yearbook

of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005: 213-36.

Moore, Sean D. “Introduction: Ireland and the Enlightenment.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 45

(2012): 345-54.

41

Moreau, J. “Berkeley et le schématisme.” Kantstudien 79 (1988): 286-92.

Morgan, Vance. “Kant and Dogmatic Idealism: A Defence of Kant’s Refutation of Berkeley.”

Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (1993): 217-37.

Moriarty, Clare Marie. “The Ad Hominem Argument of Berkeley’s Analyst.” British Journal for

the History of Philosophy 26 (2018): 429-51.

_____. “Berkeley vs. Walton.” History Ireland 27 (2019): 22-24.

Morris, David. “Optical Idealism and the Languages of Depth in Descartes and Berkeley.” Southern

Journal of Philosophy 35 (1997): 363-92.

Mourant, John A. “Berkeley and Religious Language.” In Explanation. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1973,

73-88.

Muehlmann, Robert G. “Berkeley’s Ontology and the Epistemology of Idealism.” Canadian

Journal of Philosophy 8 (1978): 89-111.

_____. “The Role of Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” Journal of the History of

Philosophy 29 (1991): 397-425.

_____. Berkeley’s Ontology. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.

_____, ed., Berkeley’s Metaphysics. Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. Pennsylvania:

Pennsylvania State Press, 1995.

_____. “Berkeley’s Problem of Sighted Agency.” In Muehlmann (1995), 149-70.

_____. “The Substance of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Muehlmann (1995), 89-106.

_____. “Strong and Weak Heterogeneity in Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Daniel, New

Interpretations (2007), 121-44.

Mugnai, Paolo F. Segno e linguaggio in George Berkeley. Roma: ed. dell’Ateneo, 1979.

Mun Seong-Hwa. Berkeley und Hegel: eine Untersuchung zur logischen Dingkonstitution und zur

dialektischen Bewußtseinsdeskription. Ph. D. diss., University of Düsseldorf, 1997.

Munoa Roiz, J. L. “George Berkeley (1685-1753) (II).” Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de

Oftalmologia 82 (2007): 121-22.

Mureşan, V. “Berkeley’s argument for the existence of God in the Alciphron dialogue.”

Transylvanian Review 21 (2012): 125-30.

Murray, Patrick. “Berkeley and Money: Money, Wealth, and Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs: a Reply

to Patrick Kelly.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 152-56.

Myers, Joanne E. “How Body Matters in Berkeley’s Siris.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture

43 (2014): 111-35.

Myllymaa, Lauri. “Mielen ideasta todellisuuden kuvaan: Henri Bergsonin tulkinta ja kritiikki

George Berkeleyn havaintokäsityksestä.” In Havainto: Suomen Filosofisen Yhdistyksen

yhden sanan kollokvion esitelmiä, edited by H. Laiho and M. Tuominen. Turku: University

of Turku, 2018. Pp. 102-109.

Nadler, Steven. “Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction.” Canadian

Journal of Philosophy 20 (1990): 47-61.

_____, ed. Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University

Press, 1993.

_____. A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008.

42

Nanavati, Shaun. “A history and experimental analysis of the moon illusion.” The New School

Psychology Bulletin 6.

Nelson, Alan, and Landy, David. “Qualities and Simple Ideas: Hume and His Debt to Berkeley.” In

Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historican and Ongoing Debate, ed. Lawrence

Nolan. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011, 216-38.

Neri, Luigi. “’Filling the World with a Mite’: un paradosso dell’infinita divisibilità negli scritti

giovanili di George Berkeley.” Rivista di filosofia 71 (1980): 67-97.

_____. “Esperienza, metafisica e geometria nel pensiero di Berkeley.” Rivista di filosofia 76 (1985):

239-67.

_____. “Il caso Siris, ovvero la ‘seconda filosofia’ di George Berkeley vescovo di Cloyne.”

Giornale critico della filosofia italiana (1990): 320-41.

_____. George Berkeley. Filosofia e critica dei linguaggi scientifici. Bologna: CLUEB, 1991.

_____. “Fenomenismo e realismo in George Berkeley.” Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 3

(2005): 470-94.

Newburgh, R. “Did Berkeley foreshadow Mach?” American Journal of Physics 76 (2008): 189-190.

Nezinska, E. “To Make Truth Glide Into the Soul [in Czechoslovakian].” Filozofia 47 (1992): 310-

12.

Nielsen, Harry. “A Categorical Difficulty in Berkeley.” Philosophy Research Archives (1980).

Nols, Carmen. Zeichenhafte Wirklichkeit: Realität als Ausdruck der kommunikativen Präsenz

Gottes in der Theologie George Berkeleys. Mohr Siebeck, 2012.

Nomura, Tomokiyo. “Recovering Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish

Context.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 45 (2012): 455-57.

Norton-Smith, T. M. “Sending an Irishman ‘Realing’: Constructive Realism and George Berkeley’s

Philosophy of Arithmetic.” Midwest Quarterly 42 (2001): 199-211.

Nuchelmans, G. “Berkeleys betekenisleer.” Wijsgerig perspectief 26 (1985-86).

Nurock, Vanessa. “La conscience morale selon Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010),

319-30.

Oaklander, L. N. “The Inherence Interpretation of Berkeley: a Critique.” Modern Schoolman 54

(1977): 261-69.

Oakes, Jason Benjamin. In Him We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Philosophical Theology in

Nicolas Malebranche and George Berkeley. Ph. D. dissertation: University of Oklahoma,

2009.

Oakes, Robert A. “God and Physical Objects.” International Journal of the Philosophy of Religion

9 (1978): 16-29.

O’Callaghan, John P. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: Toward a More Perfect Form of

Existence. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.

Oda, Takaharu. “Berkeley on Voluntary Motion: A Conservationist Account.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74

(2018): 71–98.

O’Donnell, C. Oliver. “Depicting Berkeleyan idealism: a study of two portraits by John Smibert.”

Word & Image 33 (Jan-Mar 2017): 18-34.

Oekerijee, S. K. “Descartes, Berkeley, and the External World.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 23

(1996): 77-93.

43

Oertel, Hans Joachim. George Berkeley und die englische Literatur. Unveränd. Reprogr. Nachdr. D.

1 Aufl., Halle a. d. Saale: Niemeyer 1934 (Walluf bei Wiesbaden: Sändig, 1973).

O’Gorman, Frank and Donald, Diana, eds., Ordering the World in the Eighteenth Century. Palgrave

Macmillan, 2005.

O’Grady, Paul. Review of Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst: a Modern Edition with

Introductions and Commentary, ed.Douglas M. Jesseph.” Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94):

4-8.

O’Higgins, J. “Browne and King, Collins and Berkeley: Agnosticism or Anthropomorphism?”

Journal of Theological Studies 27 (1976): 88-112.

Olanshile, Muideen, Adeyanju and Awolowo, Obafemi. “A Critical Assessment of Locke and

Berkeley on the Problem of Perception.” Cogito: Multidisciplinary Research Journal 10

(2018): 50-58.

Olscamp, Paul. Some Suggestions about the Moral Philosophy of George Berkeley. Baltimore:

Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.

Olszewski, Mikołaj. George Berkeley: Alkifron. Kety: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki, 2008.

Ong-Van-Cung, Kim Sang, ed. La voie des idées? Le statut de la représentation XVIIè-XXè siècles.

Paris: CNRS éditions, 2006.

Orlando, Eleonora. “Sobre el idealismo de Berkeley.” Revista de Filosofia 7 (1992): 53-68.

Ott, Walter. “The Cartesian Context of Berkeley’s Attack on Abstraction.” Pacific Philosophical

Quarterly 85 (2004): 407-24.

_____. “Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: the Fourth Distinction.” British Journal for the History of

Philosophy 14 (2006): 437-50.

_____. Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University

Press, 2009.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism by Samuel C. Rickless. Journal of the History

of Philosophy 53 (2015): 162-63.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Principles Expanded and Explained by Tyron Goldschmidt.

Philosophical Review 127 (2018): 115-17.

Oya, Alberto. “Análisis Del Argumento de Berkeley Para Probar la Existencia de Dios.” Endoxa 35

(2015): 109-118.

_____. “George Berkeley: els arguments positius a favor del immaterialisme i el principi de

semblança.” Comprendre 19 (2017): 83-92.

_____. “La crítica de George Berkeley al representacionalismo de John Locke.” Anales Del

Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 35 (2018): 109-126.

Pabst, Manfred. Berkeley, Joyce, Beckett: Reflexionen und Interpretationen. Wiesbaden:

Volkshochschule Wiesbaden e. V., 1997.

Pappas, George. “Ideas, Minds and Berkeley.” American Philosophical Quarterly (1980): 181-94.

_____. “Adversary Metaphysics.” Philosophy Research Archives 9 (1983): 571-86.

_____. “Abstract Ideas and the Esse is Percipi Thesis.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 47-62.

_____. “Abstract Ideas and Unperceived Existent Sensible Objects [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter

8 (1985): 16.

44

_____. “Science and Metaphysics in Berkeley.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2

(1987): 105-14.

_____. “Berkeley and Common Sense Realism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1991): 27-42.

_____. “Berkeleian Idealism and Impossible Performances.” In Muehlmann (1995), 127-48.

_____. “The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753.” International Studies in Philosophy 29

(1997): 126-27.

_____. “Berkeley and Scepticism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1999): 133-49.

_____. Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2000.

_____. “Les idées abstraites et la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” In Charles (2004), 37-58.

_____. “Berkeley’s Assessment of Locke’s Epistemology.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley

(2007), 29-49.

_____. “Certainty and Knowledge of Objects in Berkeley.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 275-

86.

_____. “Berkeley’s Positive Epistemology.” Philosophical Inquiry 35 (2011): 23-35.

Parigi, Silvia. “George Berkeley e l’illusione lunare.” Rivista di storia della scienza 4 (1987): 51-

60.

_____. “La quaestio di Barrow: un’aporia della visione tramite lenti.” Nuncius 3 (1988): 65-69.

______. “Il problema di Molyneux: avventure filosofiche di ciechi, neonati e di alcuni animali.”

BioLogica 4 (1990): 171-207.

_____. “’The Horse Is in the Stable, the Books are in the Study as Before’: appunti per una storia

della storiografia berkeleiana.” Bollettino filosofico dell’Università della Calabria 9 (1991):

113-34.

_____. “I filosofi e il microscopio: da Descartes a Berkeley.” Rivista di storia della scienza 1

(1993): 155-72.

_____. Il mondo visibile. George Berkeley e la ‘perspectiva’. Firenze: Olschki, 1995.

_____, ed., George Berkeley, Opere filosofiche Torino: UTET, 1996.

_____. “Is There a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism?” In Brykman (1997), 23-48.

_____. “Caverne, terremoti, fossili e vulcani negli Scritti di storia naturale di George Berkeley.” In

Segni e percorsi della modernità, edited by Ferdinando Abbri and Marco Segala. Arezzo:

Università degli studi di Siena, 2000, 77-105.

_____. “Teoria e storia del problema di Molyneux.” Laboratorio dell’ISPF 1 (2004):

www.ispf.cnr.it/ispf-lab.

_____. Review of The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley, ed. Kenneth P. Winkler. Philosophy in

Review 27 (2007): 407-409.

_____. Spiriti, effluvi, attrazioni. La fisica curiosa dal Rinascimento al Secolo dei Lumi. Napoli:

Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2010a.

_____, ed. George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht:

Springer, 2010.

_____. “Scire per causas Versus scire per signa: George Berkeley and Scientific Explanation in

Siris.” In Parigi (2010b), 107-19.

_____. “Lo spirito etereo e l’acqua di catrame.” In Parigi (2010a), 248-51.

45

_____. “Siris and the Renaissance: Some Overlooked Berkeleian Sources.” Revue Philosophique de

la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 151-62.

_____. Review of The Correspondence of George Berkeley, ed. Marc A Hight. European Legacy 21

(2016): 615-17.

_____. “Berkeley’s Christian Enlightenment.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 99–114.

Park, Désirée. Complementary Notions: a Critical Study of Berkeley’s Theory of Concepts. The

Hague: Nijhoff, 1972.

_____. “Notions: the Counter-Poise of the Berkeleyan Ideas.” Giornale di Metafisica 12 (1981):

243-65.

_____. “Prior and Williams on Berkeley.” Philosophy (1981): 231-41.

_____. “Supplement to the Editor’s Introduction to the Philosophical Commentaries.” In The Works

of George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne, ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop. Nendeln,

Lichtenstein: Kraus Reprint, 1982.

_____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Anselm’s Argument.” Anselm Studies 1 (1983): 103-9.

_____. “Facts and Reasons Concerning Berkeley’s Reprinted Works.” Berkeley Newsletter 7

(1984): 14-16.

_____. “The Berkeleyan Scheme of Things and Some Consequences.” Giornale di Metafisica 19

(1988): 17-41.

Patey, Douglas. “Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Kicking the Stone Again.” Journal of the

History of Ideas 47 (1986): 139-47.

Pearce, Kenneth L. “The Semantics of Sense Perception in Berkeley.” Religious Studies 44 (2008):

249-68.

_____. “Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World.” Ph. D. diss., University of Southern

California, 2014.

_____. “Berkeley’s Lockean Religious Epistemology.” Journal of the History of Ideas 75 (2014):

417-38.

_____. Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.

_____. “Berkeley on Unperceived Objects and the Publicity of Language.” History of Philosophy

Quarterly 34 (2017): 231-50.

_____. “How Berkeley’s Gardener Knows His Cherry Tree.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98

(2017): 553-76.

_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Religion.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 458-83.

_____. Review of Idealism and Christian Theology, edited by Joshua R. Farris and S. Mark

Hamilton. Faith and Philosophy 34 (2017): 365-69.

_____. “Matter, God, and Nonsense: Berkeley’s Polemic Against the Freethinkers in the Three

Dialogues.” In Storrie (2018a), 176-90.

_____. “What Descartes Doubted, Berkeley Denied, and Kant Endorsed.” Dialogue 58 (2019): 31-

63.

Pépin, François. Compte rendu de Berkeley et la chimie. Une philosophie pour la chimie au XVIIIe

siècle par Luc Peterschmitt. Methodos. Savoirs Et Textes 12 (2012). methodos.revues.org/

2940

46

Perler, Dominik; and Haag, Johannes. Ideen. Reprasentationalismus in der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin,

New York: Walter De Gruyter, 2010.

Pessin, Andrew. Uncommon Sense: the Strangest Ideas from the Smartest Philosophers. Lanham:

Rowman and Littlefield, 2012.

Peters, Joseph Etienne. Language and Vision in the Writings of Jonathan Swift and George

Berkeley. Ph. D. dissertation: University of Leeds, 2010.

Peterschmitt, Luc. “La critique du réalisme leibnizien dans le De Motu de Berkeley.” Astérion

(asterion.revues.org) 1 (2003): 112-26.

_____. “Berkeley et les hypothèses mathématiques.” Archives internationales d´histoire des

sciences 150-151 (2003): 184-97.

_____. Sciences de la nature et philosophie dans la pensée de Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., Université

Lille 3, 2005.

_____. “Can Berkeley Be an Instrumentalist? Towards a Reappraisal of Berkeley’s Philosophy of

Science.” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008): 19-31.

_____. “Berkeley and Chemistry in the Siris. The Rebuilding of a Non-Existent Theory.” In Parigi

(2010b), 73-85.

_____. “Un impensé des principes de la connaissance humaine: la physique mathématique.” Revue

Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 19-29.

______. “L’aspect formel du langage de la physique dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman,

Schwartz (2010), 413-22.

_____. “Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision: Science or Metaphysics?” In Airaksinen and Belfrage

(2011), 15-33.

_____. “Quelle preuve de l’existence de quel Dieu? À propos de la ‘demonstration de l’existence de

Dieu’ dans Alciphron IV.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 193-204.

Philipse, H. “Leidt consequentie altijd naar de duivel? Een analyse van de argumentatie voor

Berkeleys immaterialisme.” Wijsgerig perspectief 26 (1985-86) : 45-57.

Phillips, Mariléne. “Berkeley sur la volonté: Quelques ‘notes philosophiques’.” Revue

internationale de philosophie 39 (1985): 252-58.

_____. “L’actualité et l’immaterialisme de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de

l’étranger (1986): 373-76.

_____. “On Translating Berkeley’s Principles.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 609-16.

Piper, William Bowman. “Kant’s Contact with British Empiricism.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 12

(1978/79): 174-89.

Pitcher, George. Berkeley. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.

_____. “Berkeley on the Perception of Objects.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986):

99-105.

_____. Berkeley on Vision: a Nineteenth-Century Debate. New York: Garland, 1988.

_____, ed., The Philosophy of George Berkeley. 15 vols. New York: Garland, 1988-1989.

Popkin, Richard H., ed., Scepticism in the History of Philosophy: a Pan-American Dialogue.

Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.

Porter, Noah. Two-hundredth Birthday of Bishop George Berkeley [1885]. Reprint. Whitefish, MT:

Kessinger, 2010.

47

Priest, Stephen. The British Empiricists: Hobbes to Ayer. London: Penguin, 1990.

Printz, Amanda Lewis. The Scope and Significance of George Berkeley's Language Model. Ph. D.

Dissertation: University of Southern California, 2007.

Pritchard, Timothy. “Meaning, Signification, and Suggestion: Berkeley on General Words.” History

of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (2012): 301-317.

Pucelle, Jean. “Berkeley a-t-il été influencé par Malebranche?” Etudes philosophiques 1 (1979): 19-

38.

Puryear, Stephen. “Idealism and Scepticism: A Reply to Brueckner.” Theoria 79 (2013): 290-93.

Pycior, H. M. “Mathematics and Philosophy: Wallis, Hobbes, Barrow, and Berkeley.” Journal of

the History of Ideas 48 (1987): 265-86.

Quintanilla Navarro, Ignacio. George Berkeley (1685-1753). Madrid: Ediciones del Orto, 1995.

_____. Materia y sentido en George Berkeley. Universidad Complutense de Madrid: Servicio de

Publicaciones Contribuidor Rábade Romeo, Sergio Fecha de Publicación (2002).

Rabate, Jean-Michel. “Berkeley entre Joyce et Beckett.” Études irlandaises 11 (1986): 57-76.

Radcliffe, Elizabeth S., and McCarty, Richard ; with Allhoff, Fritz and Vaidya, Anand Jayprakash,

eds. Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Malden, MA Oxford:

Blackwell, 2007.

Raiger, Michael Kenneth. Coleridge, Hartley, and Berkeley: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics,

1794-1796, Ph. D. diss., New York University, 2002.

Raine, Kathleen. “Berkeley, Blake and the New Age.” Thought 51 (1976): 356-77.

Rashid, Salim. “Berkeley’s Querist and its Influence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought

12 (1990): 38-60.

_____. “Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money.” History of

Political Economy 34 (2002): 818-19.

_____. “Berkeley’s Querist and Its Influence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12

(1990): 38-60.

Raynor, David. “Minima Sensibilia in Berkeley and Hume.” Dialogue 19 (1980): 196-200.

_____. Review of L’Oeuvre de Berkeley by Pierre Dubois.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 19-21.

_____. “Berkeley’s Ontology.” Dialogue 26 (1987): 611-20.

_____. “Hume and Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish

Enlightenment, ed. M. A. Stewart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990. Pp. 231-50.

_____. “Berkeley et la théorie des minima sensibilia.” In Charles (2004), 89-102.

Rebaglia, Alberta. “Essere e percepire una struttura linguistica: il pensiero di George Berkeley

quale presupposto filosofico.” Epistemologia 12 (1989): 125-52.

Reininger, Robert. Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Reprint d. Ausg. München: E. Reinhardt, 1922.

Nendeln/Liechtenstein: Kraus, 1973.

Richetti, John J. Philosophical Writing: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard

University Press, 1983.

_____. “Empiricist Philosophers and Eighteenth-Century Autobiography.” In A History of English

Autobiography, ed. Adam Smyth, 148-161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

48

Richmond, Alasdair. Berkeley’s Principles of Human Knowledge: A Reader’s Guide. London:

Continuum, 2009.

_____. Review of New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought, ed. Stephen H. Daniel. British

Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2010): 724-26.

Rickless, Samuel C. Review of A Metaphysics for the Mob by John Roberts.” Philosophical Review

118 (2009): 244-47.

_____. “The Relation between Anti-abstractionism and Idealism in Berkeley’s Metaphysics.”

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2012): 723-40.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Idealism: A Critical Examination by Georges Dicker. Berkeley

Studies 23 (2012): 15-39.

_____. Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism. Corby: Oxford University Press, 2013.

_____. “Where ‘Exactly’ Does Berkeley Argue for the Existence of God in the Principles?” History

of Philosophy Quarterly 30 (2013): 147-60.

_____. “Berkeley’s Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.” In Belfrage and

Brook (2017), 99-122.

_____. “Berkeley’s Argument for the Existence of God in the Three Dialogues.” In Storrie (2018a),

84-105.

_____. “Is Shepherd’s Pen Mightier Than Berkeley’s Word?” British Journal for the History of

Philosophy 26 (2018): 317-30.

Rioux-Beaulne, Mitia. “Plaisir sensible et beauté morale dans le troisième dialogue de l’Alciphron:

Berkeley face à la naissance de l’esthétique.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 205-22.

Risse, Heinz. Berkeley und der Demiurg: Requiem auf das Spiel in der Sackgasse. Bielefeld:

Merlin, 1983.

Roberts, John R. A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York:

Oxford University Press, 2007.

_____. “‘Strange Impotence of Men’: Immaterialism, Anaemic Agents, and Immanent Causation.”

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2010), 411-31.

_____. “A Mystery at the Heart of Berkeley's Metaphysics.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern

Philosophy V, ed. by Daniel Garber and Stephen Nadler (2010), 214-46.

_____. “Berkeley on the Philosophy of Language.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 421-34.

_____. “A Puzzle in the Three Dialogues and Its Platonic Resolution.” In Storrie (2018a), 146-59.

_____. “Berkeley on Evil.” In The History of Evil, vol. IV: The History of Evil in the 18th and 19th

Centuries, edited by Douglas Hedley, Chad Meister, and Charles Taliaferro. New York:

Routledge, 2018. Pp. 5-21.

Robinson, Howard M. ‘Abstract Ideas’ and Immaterialism.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986):

617-22.

_____. “Berkeley” in Bunnin (1996), 694-708.

_____, ed., George Berkeley, Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues. Oxford:

Oxford University Press, 1996.

_____. Review of Berkeley’s Thought by George Pappas. Mind 113 (2004): 571-75.

_____. “Two Berkeleian Arguments about the Nature of Space.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011),

79-90.

49

_____. “Idealism and Perception: Why Berkeleyan Idealism is Not as Counterintuitive as it Seems.”

In Cowan and Spiegel 2016, 71-90.

_____. “Berkeley and Twentieth-Century Realist–Anti-Realist Controversies.” In Belfrage and

Brook (2017): 63-82.

Robles, José A. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley I.” Diánoia 26 (1980): 151-77.

_____. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley II.” Diánoia 27 (1981): 166-85.

_____. “Matemáticas hasta el siglo XVIII. ¿Qué son los números?” Diánoia 28 (1982): 155-71.

_____. “Berkeley y su crítica a los fundamentos del cálculo.” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia

10:2 (1984): 141-50.

_____. “Génesis de la noción de sustancia espiritual en la filosofia de Berkeley.” Diánoia 30

(1984): 67-87.

_____. “George Berkeley, Commentarios filosoficos, Introduccion y traduccion.” Contrafuerte

(1985): 4-11.

_____. “Berkeley y los minima.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 1-12.

_____. “Berkeley: argumentacion filosofica.” Revista Latino Americano de Filosofia 12 (1986): 45-

53.

_____. “The Mottoes in the Analyst Debate.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 15-16.

_____. “Berkeley: distinción y separación.” Dialogues 24 (1989): 81-102.

_____. “Hobbes, Berkeley y las ideas abstractas.” Revista de Filosofia 12 (1989): 43-54.

_____. The Mathematical Ideas of George Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., Stanford University, 1990.

_____. Estudios berkeleianos. Mexico:Universidad Autónoma de México, 1990.

_____.”Berkeley: Scepticism, Matter and Infinite Divisibility.” In Popkin (1996).

_____. “Filosofia natural y religion. Los casos de Newton, Boyle y Berkeley.” Revista Patagonica

de Filosofia 2 (2001): 43-56.

_____. “Philosophie naturelle et religion: les cas de Newton, Boyle et Berkeley.” In Charles (2004),

11-22.

_____. “Newton y Berkeley: atomistas epicureos.” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 30 (2004):

7-35.

Rodrigues da Silva, Marcos. “Instrumentalismo e explicaçao cientifica no De motu de Berkeley.”

Scientiae Studia 4 (2006): 101-14.

Rogers, Karen. “Two Mistakes About Berkeley.” Philosophy (1980): 552-53.

Ronchi, Vasco. Commento alla Nuova teoria della visione di George Berkeley. Firenze: Baccini &

Chiappi, 1973. Estratto da: Atti della fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 29 (1974): 871-88..

Rose, Thomasine. Verbivocovisual: the Presence of Bishop Berkeley in Finnegans Wake. S. L.:

Bellefonte Editeur, 1981.

Rosenbaum, S. E. “Berkeley’s World of Ideas.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1985): 421-34.

Ross, Ian Campbell and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and the Authorship of The Memoirs of

Signor Gaudentio di Lucca.” Irish University Review 41 (2011): 196-201.

Rotem, Ornan. “An Encounter Between Philosophy and Religion.” Asian Philosophy 3 (1993): 15-

28.

50

Ryann, Todd. “A New Account of Berkeley’s Likeness Principle.” British Journal for the History

of Philosophy 14 (2006): 561-80.

Ryder, John. “Cadwallader, Colden, Samuel Johnson, and the Activity of Matter: Materialism and

Idealism in Colonial America.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996):

248-72.

Saidel, Eric. “Making Sense of Berkeley’s Challenge.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 10 (1993):

325-39.

Saldarriaga, Santiago Echeverri. “Subjetividad e inmaterialismo en la filosofía de George

Berkeley.” Estudios de Filosofía 27 (2013): 127-48.

Santos, Antônio Carlos dos. “Berkeley face à Mandeville: de Fable des abeilles à la Lettre à Dion.”

Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 163-77.

_____. “Berkeley E Mandeville: Religião E Moralidade.” Filosofia Unisinos 12 (2011): 56-69.

Sanyal, Shyamali. “George Berkeley on the Problem of Universals.” Indian Philosophical

Quarterly 10 (1983): 7-12.

Saporiti, Katia. Die Wirklichkeit der Dinge: eine Untersuchung des Begriffs der Idee in der

Philosophie George Berkeleys. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2006.

_____. “George Berkeley.” In Kindler Kompakt Philosophie 18. Jahrhundert, ed. Johannes Rohbeck,

41-43. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2016.

Sari, Mehmet Ali. “Descartes, Locke, and Berkeley on Primary and Secondary Qualities” [in

Turkish]. Yeditepe'de Felsefe 10 (2011): 150-89.

Sasso, Javier. “Immaterialismo y verificacionismo en Filosofia del entendimiento.” Revista

Latinamericana de Filosofia 8 (1982): 247-54.

Scala, André. Berkeley. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2007.

Scallett, Jeffrey. “A Sequel to Berkeley’s Dialogues: Excerpts.” Dialogue 17 (1974): 1-6.

Schabas, Margaret. “Hume's Monetary Thought Experiments.” Studies in History and Philosophy of

Science 39 (2008), 161-69.

Schliesser, Eric. “On the Origin of Modern Naturalism: The Significance of Berkeley's Response to

a Newtonian Indispensability Argument.” Philosophica (Belgium) 76 (2005), 45-66.

_____. “Wijsbegeerte tussen wetenschap en moraal in een post-newtoniaanse wereld: Berkeley,

Hume, en Adam Smith.” Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 100 (2008):

244-46.

Schliesser, Eric; Smith, Justin E. H.; and Lærke, Mogens, eds. Philosophy and Its History: Aims

and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press,

2013.

Schumacher, R. “Critique of Representationalism and Immaterialism. An Overview of the Scholarly

Literature on the Theories of George Berkeley.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58

(2004): 279-97.

_____. “The Cognitive Impenetrability of Optical Illusions. George Berkeley's Theory of Visual

Perception in the Context of New Approaches”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58

(2004): 505-26.

_____. “Berkeley on Visible Figure and Extension.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 108-

20.

51

_____.“Action in perception? Empirical and philosophical arguments against the enactive approach

to perception.” Perception 37 (2008): 433-45.

Schwarte, L. and Saporiti, K. Vom Gebrauch der Vorstellung. Ideen bei George Berkeley.

München: Fink, 2011.

Schwartz, Claire. “Berkeley and His Contemporaries: The Question of Mathematical Formalism.”

In Parigi (2010b), 43-56.

_____. “Berkeley et les idées générales mathématiques.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de

l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 31-44.

_____. “Berkeley et la norme mathématique: de l’Alciphron à l’Analyste.” In Jaffro, Brykman,

Schwartz (2010), 423-33.

Schwartz, Robert. Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.

_____. “Seeing Distance from a Berkeleian Perspective.” In Muehlmann (1995), 217-30.

_____. Visual Versions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.

Schwerin, Alan. “On Hume’s Defense of Berkeley.” Open Journal of Philosophy 5, no. 6 (2015):

327-37.

Sekerci, Ahmet Erhan. “An Idealist Immaterialist: George Berkeley” (in Turkish). Felsefe Dünyasi:

Türk Felsefe Dernegi Yayini 61 (2015), 153-185.

Sgarbi, Marco. The Aristotelian Tradition and the Rise of British Empiricism: Logic and

Epistemology in the British Isles. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.

Sherry, David. “The Wake of Berkeley’s Analyst: Rigor Mathematicae?” Studies in History and

Philosophy of Science 18 (1987): 455-80.

_____. “Don’t Take Half the Way: On Berkeley’s Mathematical Reasoning.” Studies in History and

Philosophy of Science 24, 2 (1993): 207-25.

Silver, Bruce. “The Conflicting Microscopic Worlds of Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” Journal of

the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 343-49.

_____. “The Invisible World of Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” New Scholasticism 51 (1977):

142-61.

_____. “A Reply to Professor Mirarchi.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 714-15.

Silver, Bruce. “Boswell on Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Revisiting the Stone.” Journal of the

History of Ideas 54 (1993): 437-48.

Skemp, Sheila. “George Berkeley’s Newport Experience.” Rhode Island History 37 (1978): 53-63.

Smalligan Marušić, Jennifer. “Comments on Michael Jacovides’ ‘How Berkeley Corrupted His

Capacity to Conceive’.” Philosophia 37 (2009), 431-36.

Sobrevilla, David. “El idealismo de Berkeley.” Areté: Revista de Filosofía 7 (2013): 331-52.

Sorensen, Roy. Seeing Dark Things: The Philosophy of Shadows. Oxford: Oxford University Press,

2008.

Sosa, Ernest. “Russell, Berkeley y la materia objectivo.” Critica 7 (1975): 35-41.

_____. “Berkeley’s Master Stroke [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 16-18.

_____, ed., Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.

Souza, José Carlos de. “Deus na Filosofia Empírica.” Caminhando 13 (2008): 105-20.

52

Spicker, Gideon. Uber das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaft der Philosophie: Kant, Hume und

Berkeley. Hildesheim: Olms, 2006.

Spiegel, James S. “The Theological Orthodoxy of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Faith and

Philosophy 13 (1996): 216-35.

_____. “The Christian Psychology of George Berkeley.” Journal of Psychology and Christianity 17

(1998): 335-46.

_____. “Idealism and the Reasonableness of Theistic Belief.” In Cowan and Spiegel, 11-28.

_____. “Berkeleyan Idealism and Christian Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 12 (2017): 1-9;

https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12400.

Spinicci, Paolo. La visione e il liguaggio: considerazioni sull’applicabilità del modello linguistico

all’esperienza. Milano: Guerini, 1992.

_____, ed., George Berkeley, Teoria della visione. Milano: Guerini, 1995.

Spryszak, Przemysław. “Berkeley on the Nature of Mind” [in Polish]. Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 39

(2011): 25-41.

_____. Review of George Berkeley: Próba stworzenia nowej teorii widzenia i inne eseje

filozoficzne by A. Grzelinski. Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 42 (2014): 163-65.

Stack, George J. “Berkeley’s Concept of Existence.” Modern Schoolman 53 (1976): 281-89.

_____. Berkeley’s Analysis of Perception. New York: Lang, 1991.

Stadelmann, Elke. Philosophie aus der Besinnung des Denkens auf sich selbst: Berkeley und Kant.

Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1999.

Stammler, Gerhard. Berkeleys Philosophie der Mathematik. Unveränd. Neudr. D. Ausg. Berlin

1921.Vaduz: Topos, 1978.

Stapleford, Scott. “The Worst Argument in the World – Defended.” Think 16 (2017): 15-23.

_____. “What’s the Point of a Dreaming Argument?” Think 18 (2019): 31-34.

_____ and Wentzell, Alexander. “Was Berkeley an Extracranialist?” Philosophical Forum 50

(2019): 225-38.

Stanford, W. B. “Berkeley and the Libyan Monster.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 10-11.

Steinkraus, Warren E. “A Piece of Sensible Bread.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1978): 619-

25.

_____. Review of Images of Berkeley by Ray Houghton, David Berman, and Maureen Lapan.

Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 17-18.

Stepanenko, Pedro. “La concepcion berkeleyana del yo.” Contrafuerte (1985): 12-18.

Stephens, John, ed., The Guardian. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press, 1982.

_____. “Berkeley and Lady Burlington: a Footnote.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 16-17.

Sterling, M. C. “Berkeley contra el realismo.” Sapienta 33 (1978): 153-55.

Stewart, Jon. “Borges and the Refutation of Idealism: A Study of ‘Tlon Uqbar, Orbis Tertius’.”

Ideas y Valores (1996): 64-99.

Stewart, M. A. “William Wishart, an Early Critic of Alciphron.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83):

5-9.

_____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 19.

53

_____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 25-46.

_____. “Add MS. 39305.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 6-13.

_____. Review of Berkeley, Oeuvres, tom. I, ed. Geneviève Brykman. Berkeley Newsletter 10

(1987/88): 10-13.

_____. “Berkeley’s Introduction Draft.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 10-19.

_____. “Reid on Locke and Personal Identity: Some Lost Sources.” Locke Newsletter 28 (1997):

105-16.

Stoneham, Tom. Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford

Univeristy Press, 2002.

_____. Review of Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge, by Robert J. Fogelin. Mind

112 (2003): 126-30.

_____. “George Berkeley: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.” In Central

Works of Philosophy: The Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. John Shand. Montreal:

McGinn-Queen’s University Press, 2005.

_____. “Berkeley’s ‘Esse is percipi’ and Collier’s ‘Simple’ Argument.” History of Philosophy

Quarterly 23 (2006): 211-24.

_____. “When Did Collier Read Berkeley?” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15

(2007): 361-64.

_____. “Berkeley: Arguments for Idealism.” In The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, ed. P.

Simons, R. Le Poidevin, A. McGonigal, and R. Cameron. London: Routledge, 2009. Pp.

119-30.

_____. “Berkeley.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, ed. T. O’Connor and C. Sandis.

Oxford: Blackwell, 2010. Pp. 496-504.

_____. “Catching Berkeley’s Shadow.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011): 116-36.

_____. “Three Dialogues between Hylas, Philonous and the Sceptic.” In Belfrage and Brook

(2017), 121-40.

_____. “Berkeley and the Problem of Consciousness.” In Consciousness and the Great

Philosophers: What Would They Have Said about Our Mind–Body Problem? Edited by

Stephen Leach and James Tartaglia. Oxford: Routledge-Taylor Francis, 2017. Pp. 96-105.

_____. “Some Issues in Berkeley’s Account of Sense Perception.” In Storrie (2018a), 24-39.

_____. “Action, Knowledge and Embodiment in Berkeley and Locke.” Philosophical Explorations

21 (2018): 41-59.

Storhoff, Gary. “The Artist as Universal Mind: Berkeley’s Influence on Charles Johnson.” African

American Review 30 (1996): 539-48.

Storrie, Stefan. “Anne Berkeley’s Contrast: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 22 (2011): 9-14.

_____. “Berkeley’s Apparent Cartesianism in De Motu.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94

(2012): 353–366.

_____. “What is it the Unbodied Spirit cannot do? Berkeley and Barrow on the Nature of

Geometrical Construction.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2012): 249-68.

_____. “The Scope of Berkeley’s Idealism in the 1734 Edition of Three Dialogues.” In Storrie

(2018a), 160-75.

_____, ed. Berkeley's Three Dialogues: New Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.

54

Strathern, Paul. Berkeley en 90 minutos [Translation of Berkeley in 90 Minutes]. Madrid: Siglo XXI

de España Editores, 2015.

Stroll, Avrum. “Two Lines of Argumentation in Berkeley’s Principles: a Reply to George S.

Pappas.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 139-44.

Stroud, Barry. “Berkeley vs. Locke on Primary Qualities.” Philosophy 55 (1980): 149-66.

_____. Philosophers Past and Present. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2011.

Struve, Horst; Müller-Hill, Eva; and Witzke, Ingo. “Berkeleys Kritik am Leibniz´schen calculus.”

Journal for General Philosophy of Science 46 (2015): 63-82.

Stuart, James. “Berkeley’s Appearance/Reality Distinction.” Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 8

(1977): 119-30.

Stubenberg, L. “Divine Ideas: the Cure-All for Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Southern Journal of

Philosophy 28 (1990): 221-49.

Szabo, Zoltan Gendler. “Berkeley’s Triangle.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1995): 41-63.

_____. “Sententialism and Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Philosophical Quarterly 55 (2005): 462-

74.

Szalek, Piotr. “O genezie Berkeleyowskiej definicji ‘istnienia’ [“On the Genesis of the Berkeleian

Definition of ‘Existence’ (in Polish)].” In Stanislaw Janeczek, ed. Oblicza filozofii XVII

wieku [Faces of the XVIIth-Century Philosophy]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL [Catholic

University Press], 2008, 93-113.

_____. “On the Origins of the Berkeleian Definition of ‘Existence’.” Studies in Logic, Grammar,

and Rethoric 15 (2009): 145-59.

Szymańska, Marta. “George Berkeley’s Philosophy in Polish Studies.” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008),

32-40.

_____. Review of Recovering Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context by

Scott Breuninger. Berkeley Studies 22 (2011): 15-19.

_____. “Berkeley’s Theodicy in A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge

(1710).” Studia z Historii Filozofii 5 (2014): 149-60.

_____. “Berkeley’s Double Understanding of ‘Social Appetite’.” In Charles 2015, 147-60.

_____. “Unity, Diversity, and Order: National Religion in Berkeley’s Works 1735-1752.” Berkeley

Studies 27 (2018): 3-18.

Täljedal, Inge-Bert. “‘Esse est percipi’ and Percept Identity in C. J. Boström’s Philosophy.”

Idealistic Studies 43 (2013): 63-70.

Taranto, Domenico. “Berkeley critico di Mandeville. Note su etica ed epistemologia nella polemica

con i freethinkers.” Pensiero politico 14 (1981): 243-61.

Taranto, Pascal. Du déisme à l’athéisme: la libre-pensée d’Anthony Collins. Paris: Editions Honoré

Champion, 2000.

_____. “Le personnage de Diagoras.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 361-70.

_____. “Alciphron ou la théorie du complot.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 223-36.

_____. “Le travail de la sagesse: philosophie et exercice spirituel chez George Berkeley.” In

Charles 2015, 259-76.

_____. “The work of wisdom: Philosophical and spiritual exercise in George Berkeley.” Studies on

Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 9 (2015): 259-75.

55

Taylor, C. C. W. “Berkeley’s Theory of Abstract Ideas.” Philosophical Quarterly 28 (1978): 97-

115.

Tennant, R. C. “The Anglican Response to Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity.” Journal of the

History of Ideas 43 (1982): 73-90.

Thaliath, Babu. Der prozeß der geometrisch-optischen Perspektivierung in der visuellen

Raumwahrnehmung. Freiburg: Universität Freiburg, 2001.

Thomas, Andrew. “God, Vision and Power.” Studia Theologica: Nordic Journal of Theology 62

(2008): 80-97.

Thomas, George H. “Berkeley’s God Does Not Perceive.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14

(1976): 163-68.

_____, ed., “George Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries; Explanatory Notes by A. A. Luce.”

Alliance, Ohio: Mount Union College, 1976.

Thrane, Gary. “Berkeley’s Proper Objects of Vision.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977):

243-60.

Tipton, Ian. “ ‘Ideas’ in Berkeley and Arnauld.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 575-84.

_____. “Berkeley’s Imagination.” In Sosa (1987), 85-102.

_____. “Descartes’ Demon and Berkeley’s World.” Philosophical Investigations 15 (1992): 111-30.

Tomeček, Marek. Review of Essays on the Concept of Mind in Early-Modern Philosophy, eds. Petr

Glombíček and James Hill. Reflexe 40 (2011): 120-22.

_____. “The a priori and mathematics in Berkeley” (English/Czech). Filosoficky Casopis 62 (2014):

369-85.

_____. Berkeley’s Common Sense and Science. New York: Lang, 2014.

Tomida, Yasuhiko. “Ideas Without Causality: One More Locke in Berkeley.” Locke Studies 11

(2011): 139-54.

_____. Locke, Berkeley, Kant: From a Naturalistic Point of View. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2012.

_____. “The Lockean Materialist Basis of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Locke Studies 10 (2010):

179-97.

_____. Locke, Berkeley, Kant: from a Naturalistic Point of View. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2015.

Tommy, C. A. “A Berkeleian Model of Memory.” Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical

Research 22 (2005), 93-121.

Tooley, Michael. “The Skeptical Challenges of Hume and Berkeley: Can They Be Answered?”

Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 85 (2011): 27-46.

Torode, Brian. “A Berkeleian Correction.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 15.

Trapnell, W. H. The Treatment of Christian Doctrine by Philosophers of the Natural Light from

Descartes to Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.

Tricaud, François. “L’immaterialisme est-il réfutable?” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 591-

96.

Triepke, Sandra. Berkeleys Immaterialismus: In Bezugnahme auf sein Hauptwerk “Prinzipien über

die Menschliche Erkenntnis.” Norderstedt Germany: Grin, 2009.

Trotsak, Alexey. “Seeming confusion in interpretation: George Berkeley and Immanuel Kant”

(Russian). Vestnik IKBFU (2014, Issue 6): 14-22.

56

Tsai, Denis Hsin-An. “God and the Problems of Evil in Berkeley.” Philosophical Review 6 (1983):

125-36.

Turbayne, Colin M. “Grosseteste and an Ancient Optical Principle.” Isis 50 (1959): 467-72.

_____, ed., Berkeley. Critical and interpretive essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,

1982.

_____. “Hume’s Influence on Berkeley.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 259-69.

_____. Metaphors for the Mind: The Creative Mind and its Origin. Columbia: University of South

Carolina Press, 1991.

Tweyman, Stanley. “Berkeley’s Denial of the Denial of Blind Agency: a Reply to Kenneth P.

Winkler.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 145-51.

Uchman, Jadwiga. “George Berkeley’s ‘esse est percipi’ and Martin Buber’s I-Thou relationship in

Samuel Beckett’s oeuvre.” Anglica Wratislaviensia 52 (2014): 51-62.

Umbaugh, Bruce. On Berkeley. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson, 2000.

Urmson, J. O. Berkeley. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1982.

_____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science in the Siris.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 562-

66.

_____. “Berkeley on Beauty.” In Berman (1993), 179-84.

Van Cleve, James. “Berkeley, Reid, and Sinha on Molyneux’s Question.” In Sensory Integration

and the Unity of Consciousness, eds. David J. Bennett and Christopher S. Hill. Cambridge

MA: MIT Press, 2014, 193-208.

_____. “Reid’s Opposition to Berkeley.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 299-313.

Van Iten, Richard J. “Berkeley’s Pragmatic Bent: Its Implications for His Social Philosophy.” In

Charles 2015, 83-98.

Vermeulen, Ben. “Berkeley and Nieuwentijt on infinitesimals.” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 1-5.

Vesey, Godfrey, ed., Berkeley: Reason and Experience. London: Open University Press, 1982.

Vernon, David. Review of Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes by Robert Schwartz.

Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 9-14.

Vienne, Jean-Marie. “Les rapports entre raison et foi a la lumière de la vision.” Revue

philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1997): 45-58.

_____. “La substance, de Descartes à Berkeley. ” In Brykman (1997), 149-63.

Vienne, Jean-Michel. “Suggestion, habitude et jugement: la part cachée de la Théorie de la vision

de Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003), 79-102.

_____. “Notions métaphysiques, notions physiques.” In Charles (2004), 59-71.

Vincente Burgoa, Lorenzo. “Critica de las ideas abstractas: la abstraccion como simple semantica.”

Revista de Filosofia (Daimon) 12 (1996): 49-60.

Wahl, Russell and Westphal, Jonathan. “Descartes, Leibniz and Berkeley on Whether We Can

Dream Marks on the Waking State.” Studia Leibnitiana 24 (1992): 177-81.

Wainwright, William J. “Berkeley, Edwards, Idealism, and the Knowledge of God.” In Farris et al.

2016, 35-54.

Waldenfels, B. “Esse est percipi. Studies on George Berkeley’s Philosophy.” Philosophische

Rundschau 49 (2002): 271-72.

57

Walker, Ralph Charles Sutherland. The Real in the Ideal: Berkeley’s Relation to Kant. New York:

Garland, 1989.

Walmsley, Peter. The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

1990.

Ward, Ian D. S. “George Berkeley: Precursor of Keynes or Moral Economist on Underdevelop-

ment?” Journal of Political Economy 67 (1959): 31-40.

_____. “George Berkeley as an Economist: Reply.” Journal of Political Economy 68 (1960): 307-

10.

Warnock, Geoffrey J. Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982.

_____. “On Passive Obedience.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 555-62.

Watson, Richard A. “Berkeley Is Pronounced Barclay.” Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 1-3.

Watt, Dan. “Esse est Percipi: Beckett and Berkeley’s Silent Conversation.” In Beckett Re-

Membered: After the Century, ed. James Carney, Leonard Madden, Michael O’Sullivan, and

Karl White, 74-88. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2012.

Watt, Robert. Review of Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism by Samuel C. Rickless. European

Journal of Philosophy 24 (2016): 988-92.

Waxman, Wayne. Kant and the Empiricists: Understanding Understanding. New York: Oxford

University Press, 2005.

_____.“Kant’s Debt to the British Empiricists.” In Bird (2006), 93-107.

Weinberg, Julius R. Abstraction, Relation, and Induction: Three Essays in the History of Thought.

Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1965.

Weldon, Susan. “Direct Realism and Visual Distortion: A Development of Arguments from

Thomas Reid.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (1982): 355-68.

Wenz, Peter. “Berkeley’s Christian Neo-Platonism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 537-

46.

_____. “The Books in Berkeley’s Closet.” Hermathena 128 (1980): 33-40.

_____. “Berkeley and Kant on the Analytic and Synthetic a priori.” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981):

1-5.

_____. “Berkeley’s Two Concepts of Impossibility: a Reply to McKim.” Journal of the History of

Ideas 43 (1982): 673-80.

West, Peter. “Berkeley on the Relation Between Abstract Ideas and Language in Alciphron VII.”

Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 51-70.

_____. “Reid and Berkeley on Scepticism, Representationalism, and Ideas.” Journal of Scottish

Philosophy 17 (2019): 191-210.

Wheeler, Kathleen M. “Berkeley’s Ironic Method in the Three Dialogues.” Philosophy and

Literature 4 (1980), 18-32.

Wilke, Andrea-Ursula. Philosophie und Stil: eine Verhältnisbestimmung dargestellt an Berkeley,

Kant und Wittgenstein. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2006.

Williamson, Timothy. Review of Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration, eds. John

Foster and Howard Robinson. Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 5-7.

Williford, Kenneth. “Berkeley’s Theory of Operative Language in the Manuscript Introduction”,

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2003): 271-301.

58

_____, and Jakapi, Roomet. “Berkeley’s Theory of Meaning in Alciphron VII.” British Journal for

the History of Philosophy 17 (2009):99 – 118.

Wilson, Catherine. “On Imlay’s ‘Berkeley and Action’.” In Muehlmann (1995), 183-96.

Wilson, Fred. “Berkeley’s Metaphysics and Ramist Logic.” In Easton (1997).

Wilson, Margaret Dauler. “The ‘Phenomenalisms’ of Berkeley and Kant.” in Self and Nature in

Kant’s Philosophy, ed. A. W. Wood. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984, 157-73.

_____. “Berkeley on the Mind-Dependence of Colors.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (1987):

249-64.

_____. “The Phenomenalisms of Leibniz and Berkeley.” In Sosa (1987), 3-22.

_____. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton

University Press, 1999.

_____. Kant and “The Dogmatic Idealism of Berkeley.” Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,

2008.

Winkler, Kenneth P., ed. George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human

Knowledge. Hackett, 1982.

_____. “The Authorship of Guardian 69.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 1-6.

_____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency [Abstract].” Berkeley

Newsletter 8 (1985): 20.

_____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency.” Hermathena 139 (1985):

81-100.

_____. “Berkeley on Abstract Ideas.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 65 (1985): 63-80.

_____. “Berkeley, Newton and the Stars.” Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 17

(1986): 23-42.

_____. Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.

_____, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

_____. “Berkeley and the Doctrine of Signs.” In Winkler (2005), 125-65.

_____. “Marvellous Emptiness: Berkeley on Consciousness and Self-Consciousness.” In Airaksinen

and Belfrage (2011), 223-50.

_____. “Continuous Creation.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (2011): 287-309.

_____. Review of Berkeley's Idealism: A Critical Examination by Georges Dicker. Philosophical

Review 123 (2014): 541-44.

Wintzer, Heinrich. George Berkeley: vernachlässigte Ressourcen des logischen Positivismus.

Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1998.

Wisdom, J. O. “Berkeley’s Criticism of the Infinitesimal.” British Journal for the Philosophy of

Science 4 (1953): 22-25.

Woolhouse, R. S. “Berkeley and ‘A Famous Man of Modern Times’.” Berkeley Newsletter 3

(1979): 5-8.

Woozley, A. D. “Berkeley on Action.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 293-307.

_____. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions and Theory of Meaning.” Journal of the History of

Philosophy 14 (1976): 427-34.

59

Yandell, Keith. “Berkeley, Realism, Idealism, and Creation.” In Farris et al. 2016, 73-82.

Yetter-Chappell, Helen. “Idealism Without God.” In Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics, edited

by Tyron Goldschmidt and Kenny Pearce. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. Pp.

66-81.

Yolton, John W. “Ideas and Knowledge in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.” Journal of the

History of Philosophy 13 (1975): 145-65.

_____. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.

_____. Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.

_____, ed., Philosophy, Religion and Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.

Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press, 1990.

_____. “The Term ‘Idea’ in Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy.” In Idea, ed.

Marta Fattori and Massimo Luigi Bianchi. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, 1990, 237-54.

Young, Theodore A. Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs. Modern Philosophy. Lanham,

Md.: University Press of America, 1985.

Zakatistovs, Atis. “Berkeley a-t-il anticipé le problème de l’induction?” In Charles (2004), 23-36.

Zukowski, Bartosz. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Existence: A Linguistic Approach” [in Polish].

Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy 30 (2011): 93-108.