Bengal aluminium company case
-
Upload
fenella-andrade -
Category
Business
-
view
798 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Bengal aluminium company case
![Page 1: Bengal aluminium company case](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082916/54bdbae04a795915208b45c4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
BENGAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY CASE
Depreciation
Presented by: Anvesh Lanka Fenella Andrade Mallesh Goudar Nipun Jain
Masters in European Studies and Management (MESM)
2010-2012Manipal Centre for European StudiesManipal University, Karnataka, India
![Page 2: Bengal aluminium company case](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082916/54bdbae04a795915208b45c4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Question 1
Accounting for Decrease in Depreciation Expense Profit After Tax = 2,570,000,000 - 141,586,327
= 2,428,413,673
Accounting for the effect of ‘Depreciation Written Back’ Profit After Tax = 2,428,413,673 – 782,312,370
= 1,646,101,303
All details in Rupees INR
![Page 3: Bengal aluminium company case](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082916/54bdbae04a795915208b45c4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Question 2
Bengal Aluminium Company
2005 10.61% 2006 10.42% 2007 10.26% 2008 12.44% [Including change in depreciation valuation]
11.75% [Without change in depreciation valuation]
National Aluminium Company
2005 9.19% 2006 10.78% 2007 18.86% 2008 15.10%
![Page 4: Bengal aluminium company case](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082916/54bdbae04a795915208b45c4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Question 3
Decrease in Depreciation Expense Should have been 923,898,697 instead of 782,312,370
Increase in Net Profit Value Firstly, It should have been 2,428,413,673 instead of
2,570,000,000 More importantly, in this case, 782,312,370 must have
been added back to the profit and loss account Therefore Actual Profits for 2008 would be
1,646,101,303 instead of 2,428,413,673 Actual Percentage of Net Profit Would be 7.9%
All details in Rupees INR
![Page 5: Bengal aluminium company case](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082916/54bdbae04a795915208b45c4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Question 4
The company’s disclosure of the accounting change is adequate, provided that it can justify the reasons for its change. However, the money credited to the profit and loss account should not be considered as inflow of cash. It is merely an accounting change.
![Page 6: Bengal aluminium company case](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082916/54bdbae04a795915208b45c4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Question 5
Based on the percentages from Question 2, it is clear that BAC has been lagging behind NAC in terms of net profit margin, specially after it installed the new smelter
However, one would have to consider that those figures may not be truly representative of the actual situation and could just be bloated figures
Based on our estimation the actual profit/sales percentage would be closer to 7.9 than the calculated value
Since it has been mentioned that the other aluminium firms practice similar accounting practices, one could assume that the figures for these other companies could also just be bloated figures
Caution is advised in investing in such firms. A clearer understanding of these companies’ account books
would be mandatory