Beneficence
-
Upload
cristinaconcepcion -
Category
Documents
-
view
34 -
download
3
Transcript of Beneficence
BENEFICENCEBENEFICENCE
ObjectivesObjectives
At the end of the session, the student is able to: explain the meaning and implications of
Beneficence, differentiate the various types of Good, explain the meaning of Paternalism differentiate strong from weak paternalism, apply the principle in given situations, judge what is ethically/unethically acceptable
as the principle is applied in given situations
BeneficenceBeneficence
One has the obligation to help others further their important and legitimate interests.
BeneficenceBeneficence
ImplicationsImplications
1. There is an obligation to confer benefits that is, doing or promoting good, and actively to prevent and remove harm or evil.
BeneficenceBeneficence
ImplicationsImplications
2. There is an obligation to weigh and balance the possible good against the possible harm.
BeneficenceBeneficence
The impossibility of doing all good - this The impossibility of doing all good - this arises from limitations of:arises from limitations of:
1. The nature of time and space
2. One’s own limitations.
3. The state of the art in a given area as
well as the availability of state of the art
tools.
4. One’s obligation to avoid evil
BeneficenceBeneficence
Doing good and avoiding evil is no simply Doing good and avoiding evil is no simply
a question of principles but of practical a question of principles but of practical
wisdom weighing the relevant aspects of wisdom weighing the relevant aspects of
the factual and social situation as well as the factual and social situation as well as
the concrete meaning of human dignity in the concrete meaning of human dignity in
a particular time and spacea particular time and space
BeneficenceBeneficence
SpecificationSpecification
The things necessary for the person to
remain human and maintain dignity are the
top of the list of goods to be done.
BeneficenceBeneficence
LimitsLimits
1. Talent
It is a matter of situations in which the
effort to do good/better or to preserve the
good may conflict with the good of other
human beings
BeneficenceBeneficence
LimitsLimits
1. Talent
There is tension between respecting
freedom and securing what a health
care professional may consider the
best interests of the patient.
BeneficenceBeneficence
LimitsLimits
2. Most goods we have to do are specified by:
Law
Custom
Relationship and roles
Agreements
BeneficenceBeneficence
Patient’s Good:Patient’s Good:
The ultimate good
The biomedical good
The patient’s concept of his own good: his
best interest
The good of the patient as a human person
capable of reasoned choices
BeneficenceBeneficence
The Ultimate GoodThe Ultimate Good
The meaning and destiny of human existence;
The positions taken with reference to
relationships with other human beings, the
world and God;
The “ultimate concern” – the one to which we turn for
final justification of our acts if all secondary or
intermediate reasons fail;
This value supersedes the biomedical good and the
patient’s view of his own good
BeneficenceBeneficence
The Biomedical GoodThe Biomedical Good
The good that can be achieved by medical
intervention into a particular disease state;
The statement of what can be achieved
based on strictly scientific and technical
assessment
BeneficenceBeneficence
The Patient’s View of his Own GoodThe Patient’s View of his Own Good
The patient’s subjective assessment of the quality of
life the intervention might produce;
Whether of not this quality of life is consistent with the
patient’s life plan and goals;
The patient’s life plan is highly personal
The choices that are to be made according to his life
plan may run counter to biomedical good or what the
physician thinks is a good life for the patient.
BeneficenceBeneficence
The Good of the Patient as a Human PersonThe Good of the Patient as a Human Person
The good that is grounded in his capacity as a human
person to reason, to choose and to express those
choices in speech with other humans;
Freedom to choose
This value supersedes the biomedical good and the
patient’s view of his own good
BeneficenceBeneficence
PaternalismPaternalism
Involves acting without consent. Or even
over-riding the patient’s wishes, wants or
actions, in order to benefit the patient or at
least to prevent harm to the patient
BeneficenceBeneficence
Two (2) Elements of PaternalismTwo (2) Elements of Paternalism
The absence of consent or the over-riding
of consent
The beneficent motive
(the welfare of the patient)
BeneficenceBeneficence
Strong PaternalismStrong Paternalism
Also called extended paternalism
The health care provider attempts to
override the wishes of a competent person
BeneficenceBeneficence
Weak PaternalismWeak Paternalism
Also called limited or restricted paternalism
Consent is missing or the health care
provider overrules or overrides the wishes
of an incompetent or a doubtfully
competent patient.
BeneficenceBeneficence
Weak PaternalismWeak Paternalism
Sometimes called cooperative paternalism
when one of its purposes is to restore the
person’s competence so that the patient
may give informed consent.
BeneficenceBeneficence
Strong paternalism is ethically rejectedStrong paternalism is ethically rejected
The competence of an individual to make
decisions for another competent individual
would require both a knowledge of the other
person’s values and of all the factors
influencing their lives.
BeneficenceBeneficence
Strong paternalism is ethically rejectedStrong paternalism is ethically rejected
Health care professionals do not have the
right to enforce value judgments on the
patient on the grounds that “doctor knows
best.”
BeneficenceBeneficence
Strong paternalism is ethically rejectedStrong paternalism is ethically rejected
It would be a rare health care professional
who knew all the factors influencing the life
of the patient.
BeneficenceBeneficence
It is NOT paternalism:It is NOT paternalism:
When the health care provider acts to
prevent the patient from causing serious
injury to others.
BeneficenceBeneficence
It is NOT paternalism:It is NOT paternalism:
If the health care professional overrules the
patient for the convenience or profit of the
provider.
BeneficenceBeneficence
It is NOT paternalism:It is NOT paternalism:
If the health care professional refuses to go
along with the patient’s wishes because
these wishes are against the conscience or
professional standard of the provider, and
vice versa.
BeneficenceBeneficence
Paternalism is justified:Paternalism is justified:
If the harms prevented from occurring or the
benefits provided to the patient outweigh the
loss of independence and the sense of
invasion caused by the interference.
BeneficenceBeneficence
Paternalism is justified:Paternalism is justified:
If the person’s condition seriously limits
his/her ability to choose autonomously.
If the interference is universally justified
under relevantly similar circumstances.
BeneficenceBeneficence
Rule of thumb involving Paternalism:Rule of thumb involving Paternalism:
Decisions about health, life and death are
not merely medical decisions but involve the
good of the society and the good of third
parties, as well as the values of the patient.
Thank You!