BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN RE ... · 1 Triangle Park, North Carolina, and at...
Transcript of BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN RE ... · 1 Triangle Park, North Carolina, and at...
BEFORE THE
FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU
IN RE: PETITION FOR BASE RATE INCREASE BY
PEOPLES GAS SYSTEM.
PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBIT
OF
DR. RICHARD K. HARPER
ON BEHALF OF PEOPLES GAS SYSTEM
FILED: 06/08/2020
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU FILED: 06/08/2020
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
31T 31TEDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE31T 31T ......................... 1
31T 31TPURPOSE OF TESTIMONY31T 31T .......................................... 3
31T 31TFLORIDA’S POPULATION GROWTH AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OVER TIME31T 31T ..... 5
31T 31TBENEFITS TO FLORIDA OF GROWTH IN UTILIZATION OF NATURAL GAS31T 31T .. 13
31T 31TECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC FORECASTS FOR PROJECT LOCATIONS31T 31T ..... 16
31T 31TSUMMARY31T31T ...................................................... 19
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU FILED:06/08/2020
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 1
PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY 2
OF 3
DR. RICHARD K. HARPER 4
ON BEHALF OF PEOPLES GAS SYSTEM 5
6
9T9TEDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE 7
Q. Please state your name, address, occupation and employer. 8
9
A. My name is Dr. Richard K. Harper. My business address is 516 10
E. Zaragoza St., Pensacola, FL 32502. I am self-employed. 11
12
Q. Please describe your duties and responsibilities in that 13
position. 14
15
A. I conduct a variety of studies for public and private clients 16
using the tools of economic analysis. 17
18
Q. Please provide a brief outline of your educational background 19
and business experience. 20
21
A. I received a BA in Economics from Guilford College in 1978, 22
and an MA in 1986 and a PhD in 1989, both in Economics from 23
Duke University. I worked as a professional economist from 24
1980 – 1984 at Research Triangle Institute in Research 25
2
Triangle Park, North Carolina, and at the University of West 1
Florida (“UWF”) from 1989 until retiring in 2017. From 1996 2
– 2011 (except during a sabbatical and other time away) I 3
served as the Director of UWF’s Haas Center for Business 4
Research and Economic Development, conducting numerous 5
studies of the local, regional, and state economies and 6
economic sectors. I then served as Executive Director of the 7
UWF Office of Economic Development and Engagement, overseeing 8
activities of the Haas Center and of the State Director’s 9
Office of the Florida Small Business Development Center 10
Network. I served as the Senior Policy Advisor for Economic 11
Affairs for the Florida Senate from 2012 until 2014. I then 12
returned to UWF as Assistant, then Associate, Vice President 13
for Research and Economic Development and served as the 14
University’s Chief Research Officer during 2015 and 2016. I 15
have offered expert economics testimony in litigation and 16
served as the economic expert for the State of Florida from 17
inception until completion in its economic damages litigation 18
with BP. Since retiring from UWF in 2017, I have worked as a 19
consultant in economics, performing a variety of studies of 20
economic issues for public and private clients. I currently 21
serve as the Economic Advisor to Triumph Gulf Coast, Inc. 22
(“Triumph”), providing advice and support to the Triumph 23
Board of Directors as it seeks to distribute $1.5 billion in 24
Deepwater Horizon damages funds to projects that will grow 25
3
and diversify the Northwest Florida economy. 1
2
9T9TPURPOSE OF TESTIMONY 3
Q. What are the purposes of your prepared direct testimony in 4
this proceeding? 5
6
A. My prepared direct testimony will comment on past and future 7
growth trends in Florida, with emphasis on geographic areas 8
that are experiencing strong growth in economic and natural 9
gas demand as described in the direct testimonies of Peoples 10
Gas System’s (“Peoples” or the “Company”) witnesses Timothy 11
O’Connor and Richard F. Wall. I have also been asked to 12
comment on the benefit of natural gas use to the State of 13
Florida and its citizens from an economic perspective. These 14
benefits include the value for residential, commercial and 15
industrial customers through economical energy prices that 16
allow and promote additional job creation. They also include 17
environmental benefits relative to traditional energy 18
sources, such as coal and oil. 19
20
Q. Did you prepare an Exhibit in support of your prepared direct 21
testimony? 22
23
A. Yes. Exhibit No. (RKH-1) was prepared under my direction and 24
supervision. My Exhibit consists of 15 Documents entitled: 25
4
Document No. 1 Florida Population Change by Decade, 1970-1
2050 2
Document No. 2 Total Non-farm Employment, Jan00-Dec19 3
Document No. 3 Percent Change in Real GDP from a Year Ago, 4
1998 - 2018 5
Document No. 4 House Prices, Q1 1980 = 100 6
Document No. 5 Six-Month Ahead Predicted GDP Growth Rate 7
Jan82-Dec19, s.a. 8
Document No. 6 Annual Growth Rates in U.S. Population, 9
1960-2019 10
Document No. 7 Population Growth Since 2008 11
Document No. 8 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot 12
Bay County 13
Document No. 9 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot 14
Broward County 15
Document No. 10 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot 16
Charlotte County 17
Document No. 11 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot 18
Collier County 19
Document No. 12 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot 20
Duval County 21
Document No. 13 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot 22
Lee County 23
Document No. 14 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot 24
Miami/Dade County 25
5
Document No. 15 Citations and Sources 1
2
9T9TFLORIDA’S POPULATION GROWTH AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OVER TIME 3
Q. What are the Florida growth trends that are relevant to 4
natural gas service expansion and reliability projects? 5
6
A. Florida has historically seen population and economic growth 7
rates much greater than those for the nation overall. 8
Demographers note that Florida’s population growth rates have 9
ranked among the top seven states in each decade since 1920, 10
and in most decades ranked in the top four.P0FP 0F
iPP Florida’s current 11
population is approximately 21.5 million and is expected to 12
swell to 24.4 million permanent residents by 2030, an increase 13
over the next decade of almost 2.7 million people. 14
15
The migration of people, from sources both domestic and 16
international, into Florida has had profound effects on the 17
state’s population and on Florida’s economy. Today, as a 18
result of the 2010 Census, New York and Florida each have 27 19
representatives in the U.S. House of Representatives, a share 20
that is proportional to their populations. Population 21
forecasts suggest that Florida will gain two additional seats 22
as a result of the 2020 Census, taking it to 29, and that New 23
York will lose one, taking it down to 26. This is the 24
continuation of the long-term trend as Americans migrate from 25
6
the Northeast and Midwest to the South. As late as 1953, the 1
Florida delegation to the 435-person U.S. House of 2
Representatives was 6 representatives, while the state of New 3
York sent 45. 4
5
Forecasts for the coming years suggest that the U.S. will 6
grow by a total of 19.3 percent between 2020 and 2050.P1FP1F
ii PP 7
During that same period, Florida is expected to grow by 37.6 8
percent, almost double the country’s overall percentage 9
increase, or by a total of almost 8.2 million new residents. 10
If Florida were instead to grow over that period at the 11
projected nationwide growth rate, the 8.2 million expected 12
new residents would be reduced by 3.98 million. These large 13
projected population changes will increase the number of 14
households seeking natural gas service. Meeting the needs of 15
these new households via natural gas affords additional 16
opportunities for reduced emissions per Florida household. 17
18
Q. Haven’t Florida growth rates been declining in recent 19
decades? 20
21
A. Yes. Population growth for Florida over the four past 22
decades, and expected growth over the coming four decades can 23
be seen in, Document No. 1 of my Exhibit. While growth in 24
the most recent decade, at 2.7 million people, is not as large 25
7
as the 3.2-million-person growth attained over the 1980 – 1
1990 period, it exceeds the growth of all states except Texas. 2
Further, strong growth in the number of domestic and 3
international tourists to the state has created additional 4
demand for lodging, restaurants, retail establishments, and 5
other tourism amenities that can be met efficiently via 6
natural gas. 7
8
Q. Does economic activity growth at local, state and national 9
level mirror the respective population growth trends? 10
11
A. Economic growth trends closely resemble those of the 12
population growth trends. The Florida economy in recent 13
decades continues to grow at a substantially faster rate than 14
the national economy. This is true even when considering the 15
larger than national average impact to Florida of the Great 16
Recession of 2007 to 2009. Using January 2000 employment as 17
a base, the cumulative growth in nonfarm employment in 18
Florida, at 31 percent, is almost twice as large as employment 19
growth in the nation as a whole over the last twenty years. 20
This is shown in Document No. 2 of my Exhibit. 21
22
Florida’s faster growth is also reflected in higher 23
inflation-adjusted GDP growth. Over the most recent two 24
decades for which data is available, Florida’s GDP growth was 25
8
0.4 percent higher than that of the nation. But for the 1
effects of the Great Recession, that growth differential 2
would have been even greater. Florida suffered particularly 3
during that housing-driven recession because Florida’s 4
construction sector is about 25 percent larger than the 5
national average in order to accommodate the aforementioned 6
population growth rate that is higher than the national rate. 7
This can be seen in Document No. 3 of Exhibit No. (RKH-1). 8
9
Q. Is the damage inflicted on growth and the housing market by 10
the Great Recession now over? 11
12
A. Yes. Housing prices have substantially recovered in Florida 13
and returned to the long-run housing price trends, and now 14
slightly exceed the peak reached during the “housing bubble” 15
before the Great Recession. Current supply side constraints 16
in housing, including availability of labor as well as 17
increased building commodity prices have been primary drivers 18
of price increase, unlike the demand-side bubble that 19
characterized the 2003 – 2006 period in the Florida market. 20
This can be seen in Document No. 4 of my Exhibit. 21
22
Q. Can Florida expect to continue to have a positive growth 23
differential when compared to the nation? 24
25
9
A. Yes. Forward-looking projections suggest that the Florida 1
growth differential will continue to exceed that of the 2
nation. As noted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia 3
which constructs this forward-looking projection for each 4
state: “The leading index for each state predicts the six-5
month growth rate of the state's coincident index. In addition 6
to the coincident index, the models include other variables 7
that lead the economy: state-level housing permits (1 to 4 8
units), state initial unemployment insurance claims, delivery 9
times from the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) 10
manufacturing survey, and the interest rate spread between 11
the 10-year Treasury bond and the 3-month Treasury bill.”P2FP2F
iiiPP 12
13
The index reflects the best estimate of what the growth rate 14
in GDP will be six months from the date of the leading index. 15
The index contains 456 monthly observations going back to 16
January 1982. If we split the data series exactly in half 17
(1982 through 2000, 2001 through 2019), the positive 18
differential is larger in the more recent period. Florida’s 19
projected six-month ahead growth rate was 0.55 percent (i.e., 20
55 basis points) higher than the U.S. six-month ahead growth 21
rate during the most recent two decades relative to the prior 22
two decades. Florida’s attractiveness to businesses and 23
residents has been growing rather than shrinking over time. 24
The difference in the index of leading indicators for Florida 25
10
relative to the nation can be seen in Document No. 5 of my 1
Exhibit. 2
3
Q. Will the trend of higher growth in Florida than in the nation 4
overall continue over the longer term or does it just reflect 5
the recovery from the Great Recession that hit Florida harder 6
than the rest of the nation? 7
8
A. Yes, they will continue. Population growth rates reflect 9
ongoing demographic trends, with the peak birth years from 10
the “Baby Boom” (1946 – 1964 birth years) giving way to 11
subsequent lower birth rates. Generation X (1965 – 1979) was 12
followed by the millennials (1980 – 1994) who have become the 13
largest population group in the nation as the baby-boomer 14
generation ages. This can be seen in Document No. 6 of my 15
Exhibit. However, Florida still expects 8.2 million new 16
residents between 2020 and 2050. Slower national growth rates 17
notwithstanding, since the time of the Great Recession, 18
Florida population growth has substantially exceeded the 19
national population growth rate, with Florida growing twice 20
as fast - a cumulative 16 percent versus eight percent for 21
the nation over the 2008 – 2019 period. This can be seen in 22
Document No. 7 No. of my Exhibit. 23
24
Q. Why will Florida continue to be a top destination for people 25
11
moving from other states? 1
2
A. Florida’s high population growth trends appear to likely 3
continue into the future. Some of the primary drivers of 4
relocation decisions by those who come from other state into 5
Florida are longstanding, and include job opportunities, 6
desire for a warmer climate and outdoor activities, and, an 7
affordable lifestyle. Since the passage and implementation of 8
the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, there is also a change in the 9
relative cost of living driven by lessened deductibility of 10
state and local taxes under the federal income tax code. 11
Because of Florida’s lack of a state income tax and its 12
relatively modest property tax burden, along with its 13
comparatively modest level of unfunded state pension 14
liabilities, Florida’s attraction for inbound migration from 15
other states continues to increase. Population growth will 16
continue. 17
18
Even though national population growth rates are falling due 19
to the demographics of the post-war generations, the 20
cumulative growth in the number of residents of Florida means 21
that a somewhat slower rate of growth will still attract close 22
to the same number of households as occurred during previous 23
decades. 24
25
12
Q. Will the Coronavirus have any significant negative long-term 1
effects on the growth trends you have just described? 2
3
A. I do not believe so. Obviously, the Coronavirus has 4
negatively affected economic growth in Florida and throughout 5
the country in a way that we have never seen before, so it is 6
with some caution that I try to predict how it will all end. 7
However, I believe that once progress is made on the medical 8
front and the economy as a whole begins to improve, the same 9
factors that were causing population and economic growth in 10
Florida will still be present. The cost of housing should 11
still remain affordable when compared to the rest of the 12
nation. The state will still be attractive to persons 13
migrating from other states and the underpinnings of the past 14
economic growth will still be in place to allow the state’s 15
growth to continue as the medical situation regarding the 16
virus improves. 17
18
Q. Are there other likely effects of the Coronavirus on natural 19
gas markets in Florida? 20
21
A. Yes, I believe there will be other effects. It seems likely 22
that the pandemic will have lasting effects on consumer desire 23
to leave crowded urban environments for a more suburban 24
setting, which is the typical development pattern in Florida. 25
13
I expect that this demographic trend towards lower density 1
environments as is typical across Florida, will continue to 2
attract new residents to the state. 3
4
Further, an effect of the pandemic has been to increase at-5
home activities, including dining, shopping, and 6
entertainment, relative to historical patterns. While a large 7
part of this is transitory, experts suggest that at least 8
some of this change in historical patterns is likely to be 9
permanent and would therefore naturally increase consumer 10
demand for natural gas and support increased availability of 11
natural gas distribution systems. 12
13
9T9TBENEFITS TO FLORIDA OF GROWTH IN UTILIZATION OF NATURAL GAS 14
Q. What are the benefits to further growth in the use of natural 15
gas in Florida? 16
17
A. The benefits of natural gas relative to other energy sources 18
are well-understood. Among the most important is the multi-19
year and ongoing trend for affordability relative to 20
alternate fuel sources.P3FP3F
ivPP Another is the decrease in 21
greenhouse gas emissions relative to fossil-fuel resources, 22
and the concomitant decrease in noxious pollutant emissions.P4FP4F
vPP 23
These have led to quantifiable decreases in morbidity and 24
mortality and associated increases in economic output across 25
14
the nation.P5FP5F
viPP 1
2
Natural gas supplies about one-fourth of all energy used in 3
the U.S., up substantially from earlier levels, particularly 4
since 2008. In Florida, the switch to natural gas has been 5
more rapid than in most states and our state has already 6
benefitted substantially from increased use of natural gas to 7
meet energy needs in the home, in businesses, and in 8
electricity generation. Across key industries, from 9
electricity generation to construction, health care, food 10
service, transportation, HVAC, and other applications, 11
natural gas has provided reliable, inexpensive, and 12
environmentally friendly energy to power Florida’s economic 13
growth. 14
15
The intensity of natural gas use has grown over time in 16
Florida. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (“EIA”) 17
reported in September 2019 that Florida accounted for 24 18
percent of the nation’s new utility-scale natural gas-fired 19
electric generation capacity between 2008 and 2018.P6FP6F
viiPP Over 20
that same period, Florida’s share of the national population 21
grew from 6.1 percent to 6.5 percent. The 2.7 million person 22
population increase in Florida over that period was 12.8 23
percent as large as the amount of growth in the other 49 24
states combined.P7FP7F
viiiPP So while Florida’s strong population 25
15
growth explains some of the higher switching rate, it does 1
not explain all of it. That rapid increase in capacity meant 2
that over the 2008 – 2018 period, Florida’s generation fleet 3
went from 47 percent natural gas-fired to 72 percent natural 4
gas-fueled, while coal’s share of electric generation 5
capacity decreased from 30 percent to 13 percent. 6
7
According to the most recent data from the EIA, in Florida, 8
about 85.6 percent of natural gas use (measured by BTU) in 9
2018 was in electricity generation, with 7.5 percent 10
industrial use, 4.5 percent in the commercial sector, about 11
1.3 percent in transportation, and 1.1 percent in the 12
residential sector. This share of usage in electricity 13
generation is higher than for any other state in the nation. 14
It is indicative of Florida’s warm climate, its large share 15
of leisure and hospitality businesses, retail establishments, 16
and service sector activity, and low share of industrial 17
activity. It is also indicative of the transition that Florida 18
has made over time away from traditional fossil fuels of coal 19
and oil into cleaner burning natural gas. 20
21
Q. Will the growth of renewable energy resources impact growth 22
trends for natural gas usage in Florida? 23
24
A. No. Currently, natural gas is economic even as renewables 25
16
increase, natural gas will play a significant role in energy 1
solutions to customers. Renewables have not solved the 2
problems of morning and evening demand peaks in the daily 3
load (the “duck curve”), and mandated use of renewables would 4
drive energy prices to levels likely to be unacceptable to 5
Florida consumers and voters. Even in the future, the 6
affordable cost and rapid dispatch capabilities of natural 7
gas mean it will be an essential part of any set of 8
sustainable energy policies. 9
10
9T9TECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC FORECASTS FOR PROJECT LOCATIONS 11
Q. Have you prepared specific demographic and economic forecasts 12
for the geographic locations associated with the new projects 13
that Peoples is presenting in this matter? 14
15
A. Yes, economic and demographic descriptors for each of the 16
counties that are recipients of these specific investments 17
can be seen in the county-specific chart packages in Document 18
Nos. 8 through 15 of my Exhibit. 19
20
Q. What are your conclusions in respect to these areas? 21
22
A. In each of the areas proposed for expansion, population growth 23
is expected to exceed the national average rate of growth. 24
This means that there will be an increase in demand for 25
17
natural gas. Florida’s long-held advantage over other states 1
in providing an environment where people want to live will 2
continue, and new residents will vote with their feet in 3
moving here. If anything, this advantage is increasing over 4
time in terms of economics as the tax penalty to households 5
of staying up North was increased by the 2017 changes to the 6
federal tax code. 7
8
The projects proposed are representative of the diversity of 9
the state insofar as they meet the needs of some of the 10
counties with fastest residential housing growth, areas with 11
the greatest planned industrial growth, and areas that will 12
be expected to accommodate a greater share of Florida’s future 13
growth. 14
15
As described further in Witness O’Connor’s testimony, Peoples 16
four growth expansion projects are in Panama City, 17
Jacksonville, Southwest Florida and Miami and are aligned 18
with the growing population trend that Florida is 19
experiencing. The Panama City expansion project is located in 20
Bay county. Population growth from 2010-2018 was 7 percent, 21
and 2018-2025 population is forecasted to grow at 5 percent. 22
Hurricane Michael in 2018 has impacted this area and these 23
growth rates. Although these growth rates lag the state 24
average, the recovery of this region is expected to include 25
18
growing natural gas demand. 1
2
In Duval County, where the Jacksonville expansion project is 3
located, population growth for 2010-2018 was nearly 10 4
percent, with nearly 6 percent growth forecasted for 2018-5
2025. In addition to overall population growth within 6
Florida’s 4PP
thPP largest city resulting in increased natural gas 7
demand, industrial growth, such as LNG development near the 8
Port of Jacksonville is a potential significant demand for 9
natural gas. 10
11
The Southwest Florida expansion project is located in Lee, 12
Collier, and Charlotte counties. These 3 counties have 13
experienced strong population growth from 2010-2018 of 22 14
percent, 18 percent, and 16 percent respectively. For 2018-15
2025, Lee, Collier and Charlotte counties have forecast 16
population growth of 14 percent, 13 percent, and 6 percent, 17
respectively. These historical and forecasted growth rates 18
are robust and indicate support for infrastructure 19
development and growing natural gas demand. 20
21
In Miami-Dade County, where the Miami LNG project is located, 22
population growth for 2010-2018 was nearly 11 percent, with 23
nearly 7 percent growth forecasted for 2018-2025. This 24
population growth within Florida’s largest city is expected 25
19
to result in increased natural gas demand. 1
2
9T9TSUMMARY 3
Q. Please summarize your prepared direct testimony. 4
5
A. The investment projects presented by Peoples in this matter 6
are supported by the increased demand that will be driven by 7
population growth and economic activity growth in the State. 8
Use of low-priced American natural gas to meet the energy 9
needs of these new households and businesses will allow 10
Florida citizens to enjoy greater purchasing power by 11
spending less of their incomes on energy. This new spending 12
will ripple far beyond the energy sector, allowing new 13
employment and income to be spread broadly across the Florida 14
economy. 15
16
Q. Does this conclude your prepared direct testimony? 17
18
A. Yes. 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) FILED: 06/08/2020
19
EXHIBIT
OF
DR. RICHARD K. HARPER
ON BEHALF OF PEOPLES GAS SYSTEM
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) FILED: 06/08/2020
Table of Contents
DOCUMENT
NO. TITLE PAGE
1 Florida Population Change by Decade, 1970-
2050 23
2 Total Non-farm Employment, Jan00-Dec19 25
3 Percent Change in Real GDP from a Year Ago,
1998 - 2018 27
4 House Prices, Q1 1980 = 100 29
5 Six-Month Ahead Predicted GDP Growth Rate
Jan82-Dec19, s.a. 31
6 Annual Growth Rates in U.S. Population, 1960-
2019 33
7 Population Growth Since 2008 35
8 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot
Bay County 37
9 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot
Broward County 42
10 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot
Charlotte County 47
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) FILED: 06/08/2020
22
DOCUMENT
NO. TITLE PAGE
11 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot
Collier County 52
12 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot
Duval County 57
13 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot
Lee County 62
14 Florida’s Economic and Demographic Snapshot
Miami/Dade County 67
15 Citations and Sources 72
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 1 FILED: 06/08/2020
Florida Population Change by Decade,
1970-2050
23
Chart 1
0500
100015002000250030003500
1970-80 1980-90 1990-00 2000-10 2010-20 2020-30 2030-40 2040-50
Thou
sand
of p
eopl
e pe
r dec
ade
Source: Woods & Poole Economics, 2019
Florida Population Change by Decade, 1970 - 2050
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 1PAGE 1 OF 1FILED: 06/08/2020
24
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 2 FILED: 06/08/2020
TOTAL NONFARM EMPLOYMENT, JAN00-DEC19
25
Chart 2
95100105110115120125130135
Jan-
00De
c-00
Nov
-01
Oct
-02
Sep-
03Au
g-04
Jul-0
5Ju
n-06
May
-07
Apr-
08M
ar-0
9Fe
b-10
Jan-
11De
c-11
Nov
-12
Oct
-13
Sep-
14Au
g-15
Jul-1
6Ju
n-17
May
-18
Apr-
19
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2020
Total Nonfarm Employment, Jan00 -Dec19: Jan00=100%, s.a.
Florida
Nation
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 2PAGE 1 OF 1FILED: 06/08/2020
26
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 3 FILED: 06/08/2020
PERCENT CHANGE IN REAL GDP FROM A YEAR AGO
1998 - 2018
27
Chart 3
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
Percent Change in Real GDP from a Year Ago, 1998 - 2018
FloridaNation
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 3PAGE 1 OF 1FILED: 06/08/2020
28
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 4 FILED: 06/08/2020
HOUSE PRICES
Q1 1980 = 100
29
Chart 4
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Jan-
80O
ct-8
1Ju
l-83
Apr-
85Ja
n-87
Oct
-88
Jul-9
0Ap
r-92
Jan-
94O
ct-9
5Ju
l-97
Apr-
99Ja
n-01
Oct
-02
Jul-0
4Ap
r-06
Jan-
08O
ct-0
9Ju
l-11
Apr-
13Ja
n-15
Oct
-16
Jul-1
8
Source: U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency, All-Transactions House Price Index,
House Prices, Q1 1980 = 100
FloridaNation
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 4PAGE 1 OF 1FILED: 06/08/2020
30
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 5 FILED: 06/08/2020
SIX-MONTH AHEAD PREDICTED
GDP GROWTH RATE
JAN 1982-DEC 2019, s.a.
31
Chart 5
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Jan-
82Se
p-83
May
-85
Jan-
87Se
p-88
May
-90
Jan-
92Se
p-93
May
-95
Jan-
97Se
p-98
May
-00
Jan-
02Se
p-03
May
-05
Jan-
07Se
p-08
May
-10
Jan-
12Se
p-13
May
-15
Jan-
17Se
p-18
Proj
ecte
d GD
P Gr
owth
Rat
e Si
x M
onth
s in
the
Futu
re
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Six-Month Ahead Predicted GDP Growth Rate Jan82 - Dec19, s.a.
Leading Economic Indicators for FloridaLeading Economic Indicators for the U.S.
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 5PAGE 1 OF 1FILED: 06/08/2020
32
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 6 FILED: 06/08/2020
ANNUAL GROWTH RATES
IN U.S. POPULATION
1960-2019
33
Chart 6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
Perc
ent c
hang
e fr
om p
rece
ding
yea
r
Source: US BEA, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/POPTHM, Feb 2020
Annual Growth Rates in U.S. Population, 1960 - 2019
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 6PAGE 1 OF 1FILED: 06/08/2020
34
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 7 FILED: 06/08/2020
POPULATION GROWTH SINCE 2008
35
Chart 7
100
105
110
115
120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Perc
ent o
f 200
8 po
pula
tion
Source: US Census, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FLPOP, POPTHM, Feb2020
Population Growth Since 2008
Florida
Nation
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 7PAGE 1 OF 1FILED: 06/08/2020
36
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 8 FILED: 06/08/2020
FLORIDA’S ECONOMIC
AND DEMOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT
BAY COUNTY
37
Bay C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
1 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 2 U
niv
ersi
ty o
f Fl
ori
da,
Bu
reau
of
Eco
no
mic
an
d B
usi
nes
s R
esea
rch
(C
ou
nty
an
d S
tate
Pro
ject
ion
s); 3 U
.S. C
ensu
s B
ure
au,
AC
S 2
01
4-2
01
8. C
ou
nty
Map
: 4U
.S. C
ensu
s B
ure
au, L
EHD
On
th
e M
ap.
Key
De
mo
grap
hic
Ind
icat
ors
B
ay
Flo
rid
a U
S P
op
ula
tio
n, 2
01
81
,2
181
,19
9
20
,840
,568
3
27,1
67
,43
4
Po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
, 20
10-2
01
8, c
ou
nt
12
,437
2
,49
4,7
45
18
,409
,329
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
010
-20
18
, per
cen
t 7
.3%
1
3.3
%
6.0
%
Po
pu
lati
on
, 20
25
2 1
89,6
00
2
3,0
50,8
00
344
,32
2,5
00
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
018
-20
25
, per
cen
t 4
.5%
1
0.4
%
5.2
%
Po
pu
lati
on
per
sq
uar
e m
ile, 2
018
1 2
39
389
9
3 M
edia
n a
ge1
39
.8
42
.5
38
.4
Age
co
mp
osi
tio
n1, 2
018
0
-17
yea
rs
21
.5%
1
9.9
%
22
.4%
18
-64
yea
rs6
1.4
%
59
.6%
6
1.6
%
65+
year
s1
7.1
%
20
.5%
1
6.0
%
Edu
cati
on
att
ain
men
t3 , 201
8 L
ess
than
hig
h s
cho
ol
9.7
%
12
.0%
1
2.3
%
Hig
her
sch
oo
l gra
du
ate
or
abo
ve
90
.3%
8
8.0
%
87
.7%
A
sso
ciat
es’ d
egre
e 1
0.3
%
9.8
%
8.4
%
Bac
hel
or'
s d
egre
e o
r h
igh
er
23
.9%
2
6.8
%
29
.3%
M
edia
n h
ou
seh
old
inco
me
1 , 201
8
$51
,82
9 $
53,2
67
$60
,29
3 B
elo
w p
ove
rty1
, 201
8
13
.4%
1
3.6
%
11
.8%
•Fr
om
20
11-1
8, t
he
maj
or
con
trib
uto
r to
th
e
exp
ansi
on
of
Bay
Co
un
ty’s
to
tal p
op
ula
tio
n w
as
net
do
mes
tic
mig
rati
on
; ho
we
ver,
th
is
com
po
nen
t h
as d
eclin
ed s
ince
its
pea
k in
20
14.
•Fr
om
20
11-2
018
, net
do
mes
tic
mig
rati
on
was
larg
er t
han
nat
ura
l in
crea
se a
nd
inte
rnat
ion
al
mig
rati
on
co
mb
ined
; ho
wev
er, s
ince
201
2 to
tal
po
pu
lati
on
gro
wth
has
bee
n in
crea
sin
g at
a
slo
wer
rat
e.
•H
urr
ican
e M
ich
ael (
Oct
ob
er 1
0, 2
018
) se
vere
ly
dam
aged
ho
usi
ng
sto
ck a
nd
infr
astr
uct
ure
an
d
cau
sed
ou
tbo
un
d p
op
ula
tio
n m
igra
tio
n. T
he
situ
atio
n is
no
w im
pro
vin
g.
Co
mp
on
en
ts o
f P
op
ula
tio
n1
,2
Ch
an
ge
-10
00
-50
00
50
0
10
00
15
00
20
00
25
00
30
00
35
00
40
00
45
00
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
An
nu
al C
om
po
nen
ts o
f R
esid
ent
Pop
ula
tio
n C
han
ge (
20
11
-2
01
8)
Nat
ura
l In
cre
ase
Net
Mig
rati
on
, In
tern
atio
nal
Net
Mig
rati
on
, Do
mes
tic
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 8PAGE 1 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
38
Bay C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
5 EMSI
– Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, No
n-Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, an
d S
elf-
Emp
loye
d;
6 US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
7 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 8
Un
iver
sity
of
Flo
rid
a, B
ure
au o
f Ec
on
om
ic a
nd
Bu
sin
ess
Res
earc
h (
Co
un
ty a
nd
Sta
te P
roje
ctio
ns)
. 9 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, On
TheM
ap
Ap
plic
atio
n a
nd
LEH
D O
rigi
n-D
esti
nat
ion
Em
plo
ymen
t St
atis
tics
. *Fo
r ge
ogr
aph
ical
ly d
ista
nt
loca
tio
ns,
it is
like
ly t
o b
e se
aso
nal
wo
rk o
r a
chan
ge in
res
iden
ce d
uri
ng
the
year
.
Key
Eco
no
mic
Ind
icat
ors
B
ay
Flo
rid
a U
S Jo
bs4 , 2
019
86
,15
7
9,8
10,8
42
1
58,5
24
,65
1 C
han
ge (
%)
in jo
bs
fro
m 2
01
0 9
%
23
%
9%
P
roje
cted
em
plo
ymen
t gr
ow
th, 2
019
- 2
028
4 3
.8%
9
.5%
8
%
Nu
mb
er o
f es
tab
lish
men
ts1 , 2
017
4,7
00
5
57,3
08
7
,86
0,6
74
Es
tab
lish
men
ts p
er 1
000
po
pu
lati
on
2
6
27
2
4
Ave
rage
ear
nin
gs5, 2
01
9 $
49,6
90
$
53,3
76
$61
,38
9 R
elat
ive
ear
nin
gs (
US
= 1
00%
) 7
5%
8
7%
100
%
Lab
or
forc
e p
arti
cip
atio
n r
ate
6 , 20
14
57
.0%
5
8.5
%
58
.5%
U
nem
plo
ymen
t ra
te5 (
Oct
, 201
9),
NSA
2
.9%
2
.9%
2
.9%
G
ross
reg
ion
al p
rod
uct
(m
illio
n)5 , 2
015
$
8,3
43
$1
,059
,785
$
20,7
80
,06
4
GR
P p
er c
apit
a $
44,5
24
.32
$
49,0
07
.85
$
63,8
4.7
2
Po
pu
lati
on
Gro
wth
7,8
•Fr
om
20
00
-20
15
, Bay
’s p
op
ula
tio
n
gro
wth
lagg
ed b
ehin
d F
lori
da,
des
pit
e in
crea
sin
g at
rat
es t
hat
wer
e
con
sist
entl
y ab
ove
th
e c
ou
ntr
y as
a
wh
ole
.
•N
ote
th
at t
his
po
pu
lati
on
gra
ph
po
rtra
ys a
n o
pti
mis
tic
pic
ture
of
Bay
’s p
op
ula
tio
n, a
nd
do
es n
ot
dep
ict
larg
e-s
cale
loss
es t
hat
are
exp
ecte
d t
o h
ave
occ
urr
ed p
ost
-H
urr
ican
e M
ich
ael.
Co
mm
uti
ng
Pa
tte
rns,
20
17
9
41
,64
9
10
,35
4
2,2
16
1,8
60
1,7
02
1,5
92
1,2
16
1,1
86
92
7
87
7
59
5
Bay
Co
un
ty, F
L
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Oka
loo
sa C
ou
nty
, FL
Was
hin
gto
n C
ou
nty
, FL
Wal
ton
Co
un
ty, F
L
Esca
mb
ia C
ou
nty
, FL
Leo
n C
ou
nty
, FL
Jack
son
Co
un
ty, F
L
San
ta R
osa
Co
un
ty, F
L
Gu
lf C
ou
nty
, FL
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es o
f R
esid
ence
fo
r Em
plo
yees
W
ork
ing
in B
ay C
ou
nty
*
6,0
84
2,5
05
2,4
30
2,3
10
1,2
48
73
6
65
9
57
2
50
6
47
0
Bay
Co
un
ty, F
L
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Oka
loo
sa C
ou
nty
, FL
Wal
ton
Co
un
ty, F
L
Esca
mb
ia C
ou
nty
, FL
Leo
n C
ou
nty
, FL
San
ta R
osa
Co
un
ty, F
L
Du
val C
ou
nty
, FL
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Was
hin
gto
n C
ou
nty
, FL
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es W
her
e B
ay C
ou
nty
Re
sid
ents
A
re E
mp
loye
d*
41
,64
9
20
19
, 26
.1%
20
19
, 34
.0%
20
19
, 17
.1%
0%
20
%
40
%
60
%
80
%
Tota
l Po
pu
lati
on
Ind
exed
to
20
00
BA
Y, F
L
FLO
RID
A
UN
ITED
STA
TES
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 8PAGE 2 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
39
Bay C
ounty
No
te:
Lab
els
in B
ub
ble
ch
arts
co
nta
in in
du
stry
sec
tor
nam
e an
d 2
01
9 e
mp
loym
ent.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
10EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
; 11
US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
Em
plo
ym
en
t T
ren
ds1
1
To
p I
nd
ust
ry S
ect
ors
(2
-Dig
it N
AIC
S)1
0
NA
ICs)
()(
)Em
plo
ym
en
t•
Fro
m 2
012
-20
19
, Bay
Co
un
ty e
xper
ien
ced
gro
wth
in a
maj
ori
ty o
f it
s la
rges
t in
du
stri
es.
•C
on
stru
ctio
n w
as t
he
fast
est-
gro
win
g
ind
ust
ry s
ect
or
wit
h g
row
th o
f 4
9.3
3%.
•A
cco
mm
od
atio
n a
nd
oth
er F
oo
d S
ervi
ces,
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g, a
nd
Info
rmat
ion
wer
e
amo
ng
the
6 in
du
stri
es t
hat
co
ntr
acte
d
du
rin
g th
is p
erio
d.
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
($
125,
237
)
bel
on
gs t
o U
tilit
ies,
wh
ile t
he
low
est
corr
esp
on
ds
to A
cco
mm
od
atio
n a
nd
Fo
od
Serv
ices
($
26,1
58
).
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
rel
ativ
e to
th
e
nat
ion
’s b
elo
ngs
to
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
s an
d
Foo
d S
ervi
ces
($26
,15
8 v
s $
25,4
03
), w
hic
h is
also
th
e th
ird
larg
est
ind
ust
ry b
y jo
b c
ou
nt
in
the
cou
nty
(11
,34
3 jo
bs
in 2
019
).
•B
ay C
ou
nty
exp
erie
nce
d s
tagn
ant
year
ove
r ye
ar g
row
th
fro
m 2
011
-20
15
, fo
llow
ed b
y a
per
iod
of
con
trac
tio
n
beg
inn
ing
in e
arly
201
8. I
n g
ener
al, B
ay’s
gro
wth
has
bee
n m
uch
mo
re v
ola
tile
th
an F
lori
da’
s.
•B
ay’s
eco
no
my
was
sig
nif
ican
tly
dam
aged
in la
te 2
018
by
Hu
rric
ane
Mic
hae
l, an
d e
mp
loym
ent
has
str
ugg
led
to
retu
rn t
o p
re-h
urr
ican
e le
vels
, lik
ely
du
e to
dec
reas
ing
tou
rism
flo
ws.
Go
vern
men
t, 1
7,0
37
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
an
d F
oo
d
Serv
ices
, 1
1,4
78
Ret
ail T
rad
e, 1
1,3
43
Hea
lth
Car
e an
d S
oci
al
Ass
ista
nce
, 9
,57
2
Co
nst
ruct
ion
, 6,4
93
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e an
d
Sup
po
rt a
nd
Was
te
Man
agem
ent
and
R
emed
iati
on
Ser
vice
s,
6,0
16
Pro
fess
ion
al,
Scie
nti
fic,
an
d T
ech
nic
al S
ervi
ces,
5
,00
1
Oth
er S
ervi
ces,
3
,71
4
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g, 3
,05
9
Rea
l Est
ate
and
Ren
tal
and
Lea
sin
g, 2
,80
6
$0
$1
0,0
00
$2
0,0
00
$3
0,0
00
$4
0,0
00
$5
0,0
00
$6
0,0
00
$7
0,0
00
$8
0,0
00
$9
0,0
00
$1
00
,00
0
-20
%-1
0%
0%
10
%2
0%
30
%4
0%
50
%6
0%
Average Earnings per Worker
Per
cen
t C
han
ge in
Em
plo
ymen
t, 2
01
2-2
01
9
Top
10
Ind
ust
rie
s b
y Em
plo
yme
nt
(20
12-
20
19
)
Bel
ow
75
% o
f U
S Ea
rnin
gs
Bet
wee
n7
5%
an
d 1
00
%A
bo
ve 1
00
% o
f U
S Ea
rnin
gs
per
Wo
rker
-9.0
%
-7.0
%
-5.0
%
-3.0
%
-1.0
%
1.0
%
3.0
%
5.0
%Em
plo
yme
nt
Gro
wth
, Pe
rcen
t C
han
ge, Y
ear
ove
r Y
ear
Flo
rid
aB
ayU
nit
ed S
tate
s
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 8PAGE 3 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
40
Bay C
ounty
No
tes:
LQ
’s >
= th
an 1
.25
are
hig
hlig
hte
d. E
arn
ings
ab
ove
th
e re
gio
nal
ave
rage
ear
nin
gs f
or
all i
nd
ust
ries
of
$5
1,1
06
an
d o
ccu
pat
ion
s o
f $
20
.01
per
ho
ur
are
hig
hlig
hte
d.
Rel
ativ
e Ea
rnin
gs a
bo
ve t
he
US
are
in g
reen
, wh
ile e
arn
ings
bel
ow
th
e U
S ar
e re
d.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
12EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
;
Ne
t%
722511
Full
-Se
rvic
e R
est
aura
nts
5,61
74
0%1.
95$2
6,62
4.32
$25,
780
1.03
901200
Fed
era
l Go
vern
me
nt,
Mil
itar
y4,
179
772%
4.17
$62,
831.
97$4
8,38
71.
30
903611
Ele
me
nta
ry a
nd
Se
con
dar
y Sc
ho
ols
(Lo
cal G
ove
rnm
en
t)4,
102
-78
-2%
1.08
$45,
706.
35$7
0,29
60.
65
901199
Fed
era
l Go
vern
me
nt,
Civ
ilia
n, E
xclu
din
g P
ost
al S
erv
ice
3,62
096
3%3.
02$1
14,7
44.9
3$1
28,2
750.
89
722513
Lim
ite
d-S
erv
ice
Re
stau
ran
ts3,
065
163
5%1.
31$1
9,44
0.12
$19,
316
1.01
903999
Loca
l Go
vern
me
nt,
Exc
lud
ing
Edu
cati
on
an
d H
osp
ital
s2,
698
622%
0.90
$62,
480.
56$8
0,94
10.
77
622110
Ge
ne
ral M
ed
ical
an
d S
urg
ical
Ho
spit
als
2,31
712
15%
0.94
$75,
667.
86$8
0,66
80.
94
621111
Off
ice
s o
f P
hys
icia
ns
(exc
ep
t M
en
tal H
eal
th S
pe
cial
ists
)1,
882
292%
1.37
$80,
641.
43$1
12,5
990.
72
541330
Engi
ne
eri
ng
Serv
ice
s1,
879
526
28%
3.48
$93,
259.
54$1
12,6
880.
83
721110
Ho
tels
(e
xce
pt
Cas
ino
Ho
tels
) an
d M
ote
ls1,
500
-269
-18%
1.73
$37,
234.
90$3
6,45
51.
02
2019
To
tal
Earn
ings
2019
Nat
ion
al
Tota
l
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(US=
1)
NA
ICS
De
scri
pti
on
2019
Jo
bs
Fore
cast
Gro
wth
,
2019
-202
420
19 L
Q
(US=
1.00
)
To
p 1
0 I
nd
ust
rie
s b
y E
mp
loy
me
nt
(6-D
igit
s N
AIC
S)1
2
To
p 1
0 O
ccu
pa
tio
ns
by
Em
plo
ym
en
t (5
-Dig
its
SO
C)1
2
Ne
t%
41-2
031
Re
tail
Sal
esp
ers
on
s3,
732
-76
-2%
541
1.57
11.6
4$
$1
1.65
1.00
35-3
031
Wai
ters
an
d W
aitr
ess
es
2,86
9-6
6-2
%54
52.
109.
14$
$10.
470.
87
35-3
021
Co
mb
ine
d F
oo
d P
rep
arat
ion
an
d S
erv
ing
Wo
rke
rs, I
ncl
ud
ing
Fast
Foo
d2,
796
195
7%55
31.
429.
43$
$10.
220.
92
41-2
011
Cas
hie
rs2,
225
-20
-1%
420
1.18
9.51
$
$1
0.78
0.88
55-9
999
Mil
itar
y-o
nly
occ
up
atio
ns
2,05
738
2%24
44.
1720
.65
$
$16.
561.
25
43-4
051
Cu
sto
me
r Se
rvic
e R
ep
rese
nta
tive
s2,
046
261%
281
1.34
11.7
2$
$1
6.22
0.72
43-9
061
Off
ice
Cle
rks,
Ge
ne
ral
1,63
128
2%20
50.
9113
.21
$
$15.
740.
84
29-1
141
Re
gist
ere
d N
urs
es
1,53
199
6%10
30.
9627
.42
$
$34.
460.
80
43-6
014
Secr
eta
rie
s an
d A
dm
inis
trat
ive
Ass
ista
nts
, Exc
ep
t Le
gal,
Me
dic
al,a
nd
Exe
cuti
ve1,
445
-23
-2%
162
1.06
15.3
7$
$1
7.59
0.87
49-9
071
Mai
nte
nan
ce a
nd
Re
pai
r W
ork
ers
, Ge
ne
ral
1,24
612
1%12
41.
5114
.95
$
$18.
400.
81
SOC
De
scri
pti
on
2019
Jo
bs
Fore
cast
Gro
wth
,
2019
-202
420
19 L
Q
(US=
1.00
)
2019
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Earn
ings
2019
Nat
ion
al
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(US=
1)
Pro
ject
ed
An
nu
al
Op
en
ings
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 8PAGE 4 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
41
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 9 FILED: 06/08/2020
FLORIDA’S ECONOMIC
AND DEMOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT
BROWARD COUNTY
42
Bro
ward
County
Dat
a So
urc
es:
1 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 2 U
niv
ersi
ty o
f Fl
ori
da,
Bu
reau
of
Eco
no
mic
an
d B
usi
nes
s R
esea
rch
(C
ou
nty
an
d S
tate
Pro
ject
ion
s);
3 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, A
CS
20
14
-20
18
. Co
un
ty M
ap: 4
U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, LEH
D O
n t
he
Map
.
Key
De
mo
grap
hic
Ind
icat
ors
B
row
ard
Fl
ori
da
US
Po
pu
lati
on
, 20
18
1,2
1
,95
1,2
60
20
,840
,568
3
27,1
67
,43
4
Po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
, 20
10-2
01
8, c
ou
nt
203
,11
4
2,4
94
,745
1
8,4
09,3
29
Po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
, 20
10-2
01
8, p
erce
nt
11
.7%
1
3.3
%
6.0
%
Po
pu
lati
on
, 20
25
2 2
,09
5,2
10
23
,050
,800
3
44,3
22
,50
0
Po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
, 20
18-2
02
5, p
erce
nt
7.4
%
10
.4%
5
.2%
P
op
ula
tio
n p
er s
qu
are
mile
, 201
01
144
5
389
9
3 M
edia
n a
ge1
40
.4
42
.5
38
.4
Age
co
mp
osi
tio
n1, 2
018
0
-17
yea
rs
27
.0%
1
9.9
%
22
.4%
18
-64
yea
rs5
6.4
%
59
.6%
6
1.6
%
65+
year
s1
6.6
%
20
.5%
1
6.0
%
Edu
cati
on
att
ain
men
t3 , 201
8 L
ess
than
hig
h s
cho
ol
11
.2%
1
2.0
%
12
.3%
H
igh
er s
cho
ol g
rad
uat
e o
r ab
ove
8
8.8
%
88
.0%
8
7.7
%
Ass
oci
ates
’ deg
ree
23
.8%
9
.8%
8
.4%
B
ach
elo
r's
deg
ree
or
hig
her
1
9.8
%
26
.8%
2
9.3
%
Med
ian
ho
use
ho
ld in
com
e1 , 2
018
$
57,3
33
$
53,2
67
$60
,29
3 B
elo
w p
ove
rty1
, 201
8
12
.6%
1
3.6
%
11
.8%
•N
et d
om
esti
c m
igra
tio
n w
as t
he
pri
mar
y
con
trib
uto
r to
po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
du
rin
g it
s
pea
k in
201
1;
ho
wev
er, s
ince
201
7 it
has
bee
n
neg
ativ
e.
•Si
nce
20
12
, net
inte
rnat
ion
al m
igra
tio
n h
as
bee
n t
he
larg
est
con
trib
uto
r to
po
pu
lati
on
chan
ge. A
dd
itio
nal
ly, f
rom
201
3 t
o 2
018
, it
has
bee
n la
rger
th
an n
atu
ral i
ncr
ease
s an
d n
et
do
mes
tic
mig
rati
on
co
mb
ine
d.
•P
op
ula
tio
n g
row
th r
ates
hav
e b
een
dec
reas
ing
in B
row
ard
ove
r th
e p
ast
few
yea
rs, f
ollo
win
g a
gen
eral
tre
nd
in m
ult
iple
ad
jace
nt
Sou
th
Flo
rid
a co
un
ties
.
Co
mp
on
en
ts o
f P
op
ula
tio
n1
,2
Ch
an
ge
-15
00
0
-10
00
0
-50
000
50
00
10
00
0
15
00
0
20
00
0
25
00
0
30
00
0
35
00
0
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
An
nu
al C
om
po
nen
ts o
f R
esid
ent
Pop
ula
tio
n C
han
ge (
20
11
-2
01
8)
Nat
ura
l In
cre
ase
Net
Mig
rati
on
, In
tern
atio
nal
Net
Mig
rati
on
, Do
mes
tic
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 9PAGE 1 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
43
Bro
ward
County
Dat
a So
urc
es:
5 EMSI
– Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, No
n-Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, an
d S
elf-
Emp
loye
d;
6 US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
7 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 8
Un
iver
sity
of
Flo
rid
a, B
ure
au o
f Ec
on
om
ic a
nd
Bu
sin
ess
Res
earc
h (
Co
un
ty a
nd
Sta
te P
roje
ctio
ns)
. 9 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, On
TheM
ap
Ap
plic
atio
n a
nd
LEH
D O
rigi
n-D
esti
nat
ion
Em
plo
ymen
t St
atis
tics
. *Fo
r ge
ogr
aph
ical
ly d
ista
nt
loca
tio
ns,
it is
like
ly t
o b
e se
aso
nal
wo
rk o
r a
chan
ge in
res
iden
ce d
uri
ng
the
year
.
Key
Eco
no
mic
Ind
icat
ors
B
row
ard
Fl
ori
da
US
Job
s4 , 201
9 9
15,3
44
9
,810
,84
2
158
,52
4,6
51
Ch
ange
(%
) in
job
s fr
om
20
10
21
%
23
%
9%
P
roje
cted
em
plo
ymen
t gr
ow
th, 2
019
- 2
028
4 7
.2%
9
.5%
8
%
Nu
mb
er o
f e
stab
lish
men
ts1 , 2
017
61
,03
2
557
,30
8
7,8
60
,67
4
Esta
blis
hm
ents
per
10
00 p
op
ula
tio
n
31
2
7
24
A
vera
ge e
arn
ings
5, 2
01
9 $
61,6
69
$
58
,85
5
$6
7,9
79
R
elat
ive
ear
nin
gs (
US
= 10
0%
) 9
1%
8
7%
100
%
Lab
or
forc
e p
arti
cip
atio
n r
ate
6 , 20
19
6
5.1
%
58
.5%
5
8.5
%
Un
emp
loym
ent
rate
5 (O
ct, 2
019
), N
SA
2.8
%
2.9
%
2.9
%
Gro
ss r
egio
nal
pro
du
ct (
mill
ion
)5 , 20
15
$10
9,1
41
$
1,0
59,7
85
$20
,78
0,0
64
G
RP
per
cap
ita
$55
,28
1.7
4
$49
,00
7.8
5
$63
,84
.72
Po
pu
lati
on
Gro
wth
7,8
•C
om
par
ed t
o F
lori
da
in t
he
aggr
egat
e, B
row
ard
Co
un
ty h
asex
per
ien
ced
fai
rly
low
po
pu
lati
on
gro
wth
.
•In
th
e m
id 2
000
s, B
row
ard
exp
erie
nce
d a
per
iod
of
neg
ativ
ep
op
ula
tio
n g
row
th, w
hic
h w
asfo
llow
ed b
y a
bri
ef s
tagn
atio
n b
efo
rea
retu
rn t
o n
orm
al g
row
th r
ates
aro
un
d 2
008
.
•P
op
ula
tio
n g
row
th a
lso
slo
we
dsl
igh
tly
in la
te 2
017
, fo
llow
ing
the
lan
dfa
ll o
f H
urr
ican
e Ir
ma.
Co
mm
uti
ng
Pa
tte
rns,
20
17
9
20
19
, 2
1.1
6%
20
19
, 3
4.0
%
20
19
, 1
7.1
%
0%
20
%
40
%
60
%
Tota
l Po
pu
lati
on
Ind
exed
to
20
00
BR
OW
AR
D, F
L
FLO
RID
A
UN
ITED
STA
TES
40
5,0
07
11
5,4
66
68
,72
1
10
,00
5
8,3
83
6,9
01
4,8
68
4,3
17
4,0
89
3,9
60
42
,00
8
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
, FL
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Pal
m B
each
Co
un
ty, F
L
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Lee
Co
un
ty, F
L
St. L
uci
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Co
llie
r C
ou
nty
, FL
Pin
ella
s C
ou
nty
, FL
Du
val C
ou
nty
, FL
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es o
f R
esid
ence
fo
r Em
plo
yees
Wo
rkin
g in
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
*
40
5,0
07
13
9,3
06
68
,87
0
11
,58
1
10
,29
8
4,6
93
4,3
90
3,4
58
2,5
89
2,4
12
27
,33
7
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
, FL
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Pal
m B
each
Co
un
ty, F
L
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Lee
Co
un
ty, F
L
Du
val C
ou
nty
, FL
Pin
ella
s C
ou
nty
, FL
Co
llie
r C
ou
nty
, FL
Sem
ino
le C
ou
nty
, FL
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es W
her
e B
row
ard
Co
un
ty R
esi
den
ts
Are
Em
plo
yed
*
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 9PAGE 2 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
44
Bro
ward
County
No
te:
Lab
els
in B
ub
ble
ch
arts
co
nta
in in
du
stry
sec
tor
nam
e an
d 2
01
9 e
mp
loym
ent.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
10EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
; 11
US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
Em
plo
ym
en
t T
ren
ds1
1
To
p I
nd
ust
ry S
ect
ors
(2
-Dig
it N
AIC
S)1
0
NA
ICs)
()(
)Em
plo
ym
en
t•
Fro
m 2
012
-20
19
, Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
exp
erie
nce
d g
row
th in
eve
ry in
du
stry
exc
ept
Uti
litie
s an
d M
inin
g, Q
uar
ryin
g, a
nd
Oil
and
Gas
Ext
ract
ion
, wh
ich
saw
co
ntr
acti
on
s o
f
20%
an
d 9
%, r
esp
ecti
vely
.
•Tr
ansp
ort
atio
n a
nd
War
eho
usi
ng
was
th
e
fast
est
gro
win
g in
du
stry
sec
tor
wit
h g
row
th
of
53
%.
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
($1
42,8
44
)
bel
on
gs t
o M
anag
emen
t o
f C
om
pan
ies
and
Ente
rpri
ses,
wh
ile t
he
low
est
corr
esp
on
ds
to
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
an
d F
oo
d S
ervi
ces
($26
,362
).
•Th
e o
nly
sec
tor
in w
hic
h w
ages
are
less
th
an
75%
of
the
nat
ion
al a
vera
ge is
Min
ing,
Qu
arry
ing,
an
d O
il an
d G
as E
xtra
ctio
n, a
t
66%
.
•In
clu
din
g re
cess
ion
ary
per
iod
s, B
row
ard
has
had
ave
rage
emp
loym
ent
gro
wth
of
1.3
%. E
xclu
din
g re
cess
ion
ary
per
iod
s, B
row
ard
has
had
ave
rage
em
plo
ymen
t gr
ow
th o
f
2.1
%.
•P
ost
-Fin
anci
al C
risi
s, B
row
ard
co
un
ty e
xper
ien
ced
neg
ativ
e ye
ar-o
ver-
year
gro
wth
fo
r lo
nge
r th
an e
ith
er
com
par
iso
n r
egio
n.
•D
esp
ite
this
, Bro
war
d h
as h
ad r
ela
tive
ly s
tab
le
emp
loym
ent
gro
wth
sin
ce, a
nd
has
no
t ex
per
ien
ced
neg
ativ
e ye
ar-o
ver-
year
gro
wth
sin
ce.
Ret
ail T
rad
e, 1
14
,11
0
Go
vern
men
t, 1
09
,86
8
Hea
lth
Car
e an
d S
oci
al
Ass
ista
nce
, 95
,42
0
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
an
d F
oo
d
Serv
ices
, 85
,35
5
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e an
d S
up
po
rt
and
Was
te M
anag
emen
t an
d
Rem
edia
tio
n S
ervi
ces,
84
,47
9
Pro
fess
ion
al, S
cien
tifi
c, a
nd
Te
chn
ical
Ser
vice
s, 6
5,2
42
Co
nst
ruct
ion
, 59
,99
0
Oth
er S
ervi
ces
(exc
ept
Pu
blic
Ad
min
istr
atio
n),
4
8,6
18
Wh
ole
sale
Tra
de,
4
5,7
71
Fin
ance
an
d In
sura
nce
, 42
,52
2
$0
$2
0,0
00
$4
0,0
00
$6
0,0
00
$8
0,0
00
$1
00
,00
0
$1
20
,00
0
0%
10
%2
0%
30
%4
0%
50
%6
0%
Average Earnings per Worker
Per
cen
t C
han
ge in
Em
plo
ymen
t, 2
01
2-2
01
9
Top
10
Ind
ust
rie
s b
y Em
plo
yme
nt
(20
12
-20
19
)
Bel
ow
75
% o
f U
S Ea
rnin
gs p
erW
ork
erB
etw
een
75
% a
nd
10
0%
Ab
ove
10
0%
of
US
Earn
ings
per
Wo
rker
-12
.00
%
-7.0
0%
-2.0
0%
3.0
0%
8.0
0%
Emp
loym
en
t G
row
th, P
erc
ent
Ch
ange
, Ye
ar-o
ver-
Ye
ar
Flo
rid
aB
row
ard
Un
ited
Sta
tes
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 9PAGE 3 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
45
Bro
ward
County
No
tes:
LQ
’s >
= th
an 1
.25
are
hig
hlig
hte
d. E
arn
ings
ab
ove
th
e re
gio
nal
ave
rage
ear
nin
gs f
or
all i
nd
ust
ries
of
$6
1,6
69
an
d o
ccu
pat
ion
s o
f $
23
.70
per
ho
ur
are
hig
hlig
hte
d.
Rel
ativ
e Ea
rnin
gs a
bo
ve t
he
US
are
in g
reen
, wh
ile e
arn
ings
bel
ow
th
e U
S ar
e re
d.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
12EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
;
Ne
t%
903999
Loca
l Go
vern
men
t, E
xclu
din
g Ed
uca
tio
n a
nd
Ho
spit
als
38
,34
76
35
2%
1.2
0$
86
,90
2.5
8$
80
,94
11
.07
722511
Full
-Ser
vice
Res
tau
ran
ts3
8,1
13
37
25
10
%1
.25
$2
9,1
70
.60
$2
5,7
80
1.1
3
903611
Elem
enta
ry a
nd
Sec
on
dar
y Sc
ho
ols
(Lo
cal G
ove
rnm
ent)
29
,42
95
17
2%
0.7
3$
59
,65
7.9
1$
70
,29
60
.85
722513
Lim
ited
-Ser
vice
Res
tau
ran
ts2
3,7
16
20
80
9%
0.9
5$
18
,11
8.2
3$
19
,31
60
.94
621111
Off
ices
of P
hys
icia
ns
(exc
ept
Men
tal H
ealt
h S
pec
iali
sts)
21
,29
73
12
31
5%
1.4
6$
11
1,4
60
.52
$1
12
,59
90
.99
903622
Ho
spit
als
(Lo
cal G
ove
rnm
ent)
21
,23
01
07
45
%5
.65
$8
6,1
43
.69
$8
9,9
76
0.9
6
445110
Sup
erm
arke
ts a
nd
Oth
er G
roce
ry (e
xcep
t C
on
ven
ien
ce) S
tore
s1
8,6
70
15
21
%1
.31
$3
0,2
78
.52
$3
1,7
19
0.9
5
561320
Tem
po
rary
Hel
p S
ervi
ces
15
,57
23
14
2%
0.9
5$
53
,79
3.7
1$
41
,03
61
.31
541110
Off
ices
of L
awye
rs1
2,9
21
-11
8-1
%1
.86
$1
03
,11
9.0
2$
11
8,4
45
0.8
7
561720
Jan
ito
rial
Ser
vice
s1
2,5
76
16
90
13
%1
.64
$2
3,6
67
.64
$2
7,6
49
0.8
6
20
19
Jo
bs
20
19
To
tal
Earn
ings
20
19
Nat
ion
al
Tota
l
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(US=
1)
20
19
LQ
(US=
1.
00
)
NA
ICS
De
scri
pti
on
Fore
cast
Gro
wth
,
20
19
-20
24
Ne
t%
41
-20
31
Ret
ail S
ales
per
son
s3
3,9
30
38
31
%5
,06
61
.35
$1
0.4
6$
11
.65
0.9
0
43
-40
51
Cu
sto
mer
Ser
vice
Rep
rese
nta
tive
s2
6,8
02
58
42
%3
,73
71
.65
$1
5.2
9$
16
.22
0.9
4
41
-20
11
Cas
hie
rs2
2,5
03
-27
4-1
%4
,24
01
.12
$9
.60
$1
0.7
80
.89
43
-90
61
Off
ice
Cle
rks,
Gen
eral
19
,90
52
54
1%
2,4
79
1.0
5$
14
.84
$1
5.7
40
.94
35
-30
21
Co
mb
ined
Fo
od
Pre
par
atio
n a
nd
Ser
vin
g W
ork
ers
19
,50
42
12
11
1%
4,0
75
0.9
4$
8.9
7$
10
.22
0.8
8
35
-30
31
Wai
ters
an
d W
aitr
esse
s1
7,4
04
11
00
6%
3,6
68
1.2
0$
9.0
6$
10
.47
0.8
7
53
-70
62
Lab
ore
rs a
nd
Fre
igh
t, S
tock
, an
d M
ater
ial M
ove
rs1
6,4
70
88
75
%2
,53
40
.98
$1
3.1
9$
13
.58
0.9
7
37
-20
11
Jan
ito
rs a
nd
Cle
aner
s1
6,1
08
15
72
10
%2
,54
01
.12
$1
0.7
0$
12
.58
0.8
5
43
-60
14
Secr
etar
ies a
nd
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e A
ssis
tan
ts1
5,5
71
-19
3-1
%1
,76
91
.08
$1
6.3
5$
17
.59
0.9
3
29
-11
41
Reg
iste
red
Nu
rses
15
,26
31
25
08
%1
,09
10
.91
$3
2.2
3$
34
.46
0.9
4
20
19
Nat
ion
al
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(US=
1)
Pro
ject
ed
An
nu
al
Op
en
ings
20
19
Jo
bs
20
19
LQ
(US=
1.0
0)
20
19
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Earn
ings
SOC
De
scri
pti
on
Fore
cast
Gro
wth
,
20
19
-20
24
To
p 1
0 I
nd
ust
rie
s b
y E
mp
loy
me
nt
(6-D
igit
s N
AIC
S)1
2
To
p 1
0 O
ccu
pa
tio
ns
by
Em
plo
ym
en
t (5
-Dig
its
SO
C)1
2
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 9PAGE 4 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
46
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 10 FILED: 06/08/2020
FLORIDA’S ECONOMIC
AND DEMOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT
CHARLOTTE COUNTY
47
Charl
ott
e C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
1 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 2 U
niv
ersi
ty o
f Fl
ori
da,
Bu
reau
of
Eco
no
mic
an
d B
usi
nes
s R
esea
rch
(C
ou
nty
an
d S
tate
Pro
ject
ion
s);
3 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, A
CS
20
14
-20
18
. Co
un
ty M
ap: 4
U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, LEH
D O
n t
he
Map
.
Key
De
mo
grap
hic
Ind
icat
ors
C
har
lott
e Fl
ori
da
US
Po
pu
lati
on
, 20
18
1,2
1
84,9
88
2
0,8
40,5
68
327
,16
7,4
34
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
010
-20
18
, co
un
t 2
5,0
24
2,4
94
,745
1
8,4
09,3
29
Po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
, 20
10-2
01
8, p
erce
nt
15
.6%
1
3.3
%
6.0
%
Po
pu
lati
on
, 20
25
2 1
96,6
43
2
3,0
50,8
00
344
,32
2,5
00
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
018
-20
25
, per
cen
t 6
.3%
1
0.4
%
5.2
%
Po
pu
lati
on
per
sq
uar
e m
ile, 2
018
1 2
72
389
9
3 M
edia
n a
ge1
58
.6
42
.5
38
.4
Age
co
mp
osi
tio
n1, 2
018
0
-17
yea
rs
14
.9%
1
9.9
%
22
.4%
18
-64
yea
rs4
4.9
%
59
.6%
6
1.6
%
65+
year
s4
0.2
%
20
.5%
1
6.0
%
Edu
cati
on
att
ain
men
t3 , 201
8 L
ess
than
hig
h s
cho
ol
10
.9%
1
2.0
%
12
.3%
H
igh
er s
cho
ol g
rad
uat
e o
r ab
ove
2
2.8
%
88
.0%
8
7.7
%
Ass
oci
ates
’ deg
ree
25
.7%
9
.8%
8
.4%
B
ach
elo
r's
deg
ree
or
hig
her
1
7.8
%
26
.8%
2
9.3
%
Med
ian
ho
use
ho
ld in
com
e1 , 2
018
$
49,2
25
$53
,26
7 $
60,2
93
Bel
ow
po
vert
y1, 2
018
1
1.1
%
13
.6%
1
1.8
%
•Fr
om
20
11-2
01
8, n
et d
om
esti
c m
igra
tio
n h
as
vast
ly o
utp
aced
th
e o
ther
co
mp
on
ents
of
po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
.
•To
tal p
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge p
eake
d in
in 2
015
an
d
has
bee
n d
ecre
asin
g si
nce
as
the
con
trac
tio
n in
net
do
mes
tic
mig
rati
on
an
d t
he
incr
easi
ngl
y
neg
ativ
e n
atu
ral c
om
po
nen
t o
utw
eig
h
incr
easi
ng
net
inte
rnat
ion
al m
igra
tio
n.
•N
ote
th
at t
he
dec
reas
ing
net
nat
ura
l in
crea
ses
is li
kely
a r
esu
lt o
f th
e u
nu
sual
ly h
igh
med
ian
age
in C
har
lott
e C
ou
nty
, wh
ich
exc
eed
s th
e
nat
ion
al a
vera
ge b
y o
ver
20 y
ears
.
Co
mp
on
en
ts o
f P
op
ula
tio
n1
,2
Ch
an
ge
-40
00
-20
000
20
00
40
00
60
00
80
00
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
An
nu
al C
om
po
nen
ts o
f R
esid
ent
Pop
ula
tio
n C
han
ge (
20
11
-2
01
8)
Nat
ura
l In
cre
ase
Net
Mig
rati
on
, In
tern
atio
nal
Net
Mig
rati
on
, Do
mes
tic
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 10PAGE 1 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
48
Charl
ott
e C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
5 EMSI
– Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, No
n-Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, an
d S
elf-
Emp
loye
d;
6 US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
7 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 8
Un
iver
sity
of
Flo
rid
a, B
ure
au o
f Ec
on
om
ic a
nd
Bu
sin
ess
Res
earc
h (
Co
un
ty a
nd
Sta
te P
roje
ctio
ns)
. 9 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, On
TheM
ap
Ap
plic
atio
n a
nd
LEH
D O
rigi
n-D
esti
nat
ion
Em
plo
ymen
t St
atis
tics
. *Fo
r ge
ogr
aph
ical
ly d
ista
nt
loca
tio
ns,
it is
like
ly t
o b
e se
aso
nal
wo
rk o
r a
chan
ge in
res
iden
ce d
uri
ng
the
year
.
Key
Eco
no
mic
Ind
icat
ors
C
har
lott
e Fl
ori
da
US
Job
s4 , 201
9 5
3,3
63
9,8
10,8
42
1
58,5
24
,65
1 C
han
ge (
%)
in jo
bs
fro
m 2
01
0 1
9%
23
%
9%
P
roje
cted
em
plo
ymen
t gr
ow
th, 2
019
- 2
028
4 1
0%
9
.5%
8
%
Nu
mb
er o
f e
stab
lish
men
ts1 , 2
017
4,0
06
557
,30
8
7,8
60
,67
4
Esta
blis
hm
ents
per
10
00 p
op
ula
tio
n
21
27
2
4
Ave
rage
ear
nin
gs5, 2
01
9 $
46
,50
5
$53
,37
6 $
61,3
89
Rel
ativ
e e
arn
ings
(U
S =
10
0%)
76%
8
7%
100
%
Lab
or
forc
e p
arti
cip
atio
n r
ate
6 , 20
14
42
.4%
5
8.5
%
58
.5%
U
nem
plo
ymen
t ra
te5 (
Oct
, 201
9),
NSA
3
.3%
2
.9%
2
.9%
G
ross
reg
ion
al p
rod
uct
(m
illio
n)5 , 2
015
$
4,7
60
$1
,059
,785
$
20,7
80
,06
4
GR
P p
er c
apit
a $
25,2
23
.53
$
49,0
07
.85
$
63,8
4.7
2
Po
pu
lati
on
Gro
wth
7,8
•W
hile
Ch
arlo
tte’
s p
op
ula
tio
n g
row
thh
as s
ign
ific
antl
y o
utp
aced
th
egr
ow
th o
f th
e U
S as
a w
ho
le,
it h
asfa
llen
beh
ind
Flo
rid
a b
egin
nin
g in
th
eea
rly
20
00’
s.
•C
har
lott
e’s
po
pu
lati
on
gro
wth
beg
anto
sta
gnat
e a
rou
nd
200
7, d
irec
tly
pre
ced
ing
the
late
20
00’s
ho
usi
ng
cris
is. T
his
sta
gnat
ion
was
bri
ef, a
nd
gro
wth
res
um
ed a
pp
roxi
mat
ely
aye
ar f
ollo
win
g.
•P
ost
-20
10
, Ch
arlo
tte
has
exp
erie
nce
d g
row
th a
pp
roxi
mat
ely
equ
al t
o t
hat
of
Flo
rid
a.
Co
mm
uti
ng
Pa
tte
rns,
20
17
9
20
19
, 30
.4%
20
19
, 34
.0%
20
19
, 17
.1%
0%
20
%
40
%
60
%
80
%
Tota
l Po
pu
lati
on
Ind
exe
d t
o 2
00
0
CH
AR
LOTT
E, F
L
FLO
RID
A
UN
ITED
STA
TES
17
,80
3
6,2
41
3,6
58
1,1
19
1,0
58
1,0
55
94
6
88
0
66
8
61
1
6,0
29
Ch
arlo
tte
Co
un
ty, F
L
Sara
sota
Co
un
ty, F
L
Lee
Co
un
ty, F
L
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Man
atee
Co
un
ty, F
L
DeS
oto
Co
un
ty, F
L
Pin
ella
s C
ou
nty
, FL
Co
llie
r C
ou
nty
, FL
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es o
f R
esid
ence
fo
r Em
plo
yees
W
ork
ing
in C
har
lott
e C
ou
nty
*
17
,80
3
7,0
69
6,1
98
1,7
58
1,6
58
1,6
09
1,2
84
1,2
20
1,0
82
1,0
58
6,3
12
Ch
arlo
tte
Co
un
ty, F
L
Sara
sota
Co
un
ty, F
L
Lee
Co
un
ty, F
L
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
, FL
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Pal
m B
each
Co
un
ty, F
L
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
Co
llie
r C
ou
nty
, FL
Pin
ella
s C
ou
nty
, FL
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es W
her
e C
har
lott
e C
ou
nty
R
esi
den
ts A
re E
mp
loye
d*
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 10PAGE 2 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
49
Charl
ott
e C
ounty
No
te:
Lab
els
in B
ub
ble
ch
arts
co
nta
in in
du
stry
sec
tor
nam
e an
d 2
01
9 e
mp
loym
ent.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
10EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
; 11
US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
Em
plo
ym
en
t T
ren
ds1
1
To
p I
nd
ust
ry S
ect
ors
(2
-Dig
it N
AIC
S)1
0
NA
ICs)
()(
)Em
plo
ym
en
t•
Des
pit
e p
osi
tive
gro
wth
in m
ost
its
larg
est
ind
ust
ries
, Ch
arlo
tte
Co
un
ty s
till
has
man
y
sect
ors
wit
h a
vera
ge e
arn
ings
wel
l bel
ow
th
e
nat
ion
al a
vera
ge.
•Tr
ansp
ort
atio
n a
nd
War
eho
usi
ng
was
th
e
fast
est-
gro
win
g in
du
stry
se
cto
r w
ith
gro
wth
of
123
.4%
.
•A
gric
ult
ure
, Uti
litie
s, a
s w
ell a
s fo
ur
oth
er
sect
ors
co
ntr
acte
d d
uri
ng
this
per
iod
.
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
($
105,
496
)
bel
on
gs t
o M
anu
fact
uri
ng,
wh
ile t
he
low
est
corr
esp
on
ds
to A
cco
mm
od
atio
n a
nd
Fo
od
Serv
ices
($
22,5
30
).
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
rel
ativ
e to
th
e
nat
ion
’s b
elo
ngs
to
Hea
lth
Car
e an
d S
oci
al
Ass
ista
nce
($6
2,9
25 v
s $
61,4
90),
wh
ich
is
also
th
e se
con
d la
rges
t in
du
stry
by
job
co
un
t
in t
he
cou
nty
(9
,610
job
s in
201
9).
•C
har
lott
e C
ou
nty
exp
erie
nce
d p
erio
ds
of
mu
ch m
ore
vola
tile
em
plo
ymen
t gr
ow
th d
uri
ng
and
imm
edia
tely
follo
win
g th
e la
te 2
000
’s h
ou
sin
g cr
isis
, bu
t in
gen
eral
its
gro
wth
was
ou
tpac
ed b
y th
e U
S an
d F
lori
da.
•Si
nce
aro
un
d 2
016
Ch
arlo
tte’
s gr
ow
th b
egan
to
tra
ck
mu
ch m
ore
clo
sely
wit
h F
lori
da’
s, a
t ar
ou
nd
1.7
5% a
bo
ve
that
of
the
US.
Ho
wev
er, i
n r
ece
nt
year
s al
l th
ree
regi
on
s
hav
e se
en
sim
ilar
slig
ht
dec
reas
es in
em
plo
ymen
t gr
ow
th.
Ret
ail T
rad
e, 9
,85
8
Hea
lth
Car
e an
d S
oci
al
Ass
ista
nce
, 9
,61
0
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
an
d F
oo
d
Serv
ices
, 6,4
44
Go
vern
men
t, 6
,26
6
Co
nst
ruct
ion
, 4,9
05
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e an
d
Sup
po
rt, 2
,71
4
Oth
er S
ervi
ces
(exc
ept
Pu
blic
Ad
min
istr
atio
n),
2
,62
7
Pro
fess
ion
al,
Scie
nti
fic,
an
d
Tech
nic
al
Serv
ices
, 2,2
04
Rea
l Est
ate
and
Ren
tal a
nd
Le
asin
g, 1
,50
6
Art
s, E
nte
rtai
nm
ent,
an
d
Rec
reat
ion
, 1,4
40
$0
$10,
000
$20,
000
$30,
000
$40,
000
$50,
000
$60,
000
$70,
000
$80,
000
$90,
000
-20
%-1
0%
0%
10
%2
0%
30
%4
0%
50
%6
0%
70
%
Average Earnings per Worker
Per
cen
t C
han
ge in
Em
plo
ymen
t, 2
01
2-2
01
9
Top
10
Ind
ust
rie
s b
y Em
plo
yme
nt
(20
12
-20
19
)
Bel
ow
75
% o
f U
S Ea
rnin
gs p
erW
ork
erB
etw
een
75
% a
nd
10
0%
Ab
ove
10
0%
of
US
Earn
ings
per
Wo
rker
-9.0
%
-7.0
%
-5.0
%
-3.0
%
-1.0
%
1.0
%
3.0
%
5.0
%Em
plo
yme
nt
Gro
wth
, Pe
rcen
t C
han
ge, Y
ear
ove
r Y
ear
Flo
rid
aC
har
lott
eU
nit
ed S
tate
s
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 10PAGE 3 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
50
Charl
ott
e C
ounty
No
tes:
LQ
’s >
= th
an 1
.25
are
hig
hlig
hte
d. E
arn
ings
ab
ove
th
e re
gio
nal
ave
rage
ear
nin
gs f
or
all i
nd
ust
ries
of
$4
6,5
05
an
d o
ccu
pat
ion
s o
f $
21
.48
per
ho
ur
are
hig
hlig
hte
d.
Rel
ativ
e Ea
rnin
gs a
bo
ve t
he
US
are
in g
reen
, wh
ile e
arn
ings
bel
ow
th
e U
S ar
e re
d.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
12EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
;
Ne
t%
722511
Full
-Se
rvic
e R
est
aura
nts
3,68
747
013
%2.
07$2
4,46
9.33
$25,
780
0.95
903999
Loca
l Go
vern
me
nt,
Exc
lud
ing
Edu
cati
on
an
d H
osp
ital
s2,
536
118
5%1.
36$7
1,71
9.99
$80,
941
0.89
622110
Ge
ne
ral M
ed
ical
an
d S
urg
ical
Ho
spit
als
2,18
3-3
6-2
%1.
42$6
9,09
4.48
$80,
668
0.86
903611
Ele
me
nta
ry a
nd
Se
con
dar
y Sc
ho
ols
2,
169
-80
-4%
0.93
$55,
036.
10$7
0,29
60.
78
621111
Off
ice
s o
f P
hys
icia
ns
2,04
625
613
%2.
40$9
9,15
6.09
$112
,599
0.88
722513
Lim
ite
d-S
erv
ice
Re
stau
ran
ts1,
643
234
14%
1.13
$16,
426.
85$1
9,31
60.
85
445110
Sup
erm
arke
ts a
nd
Oth
er
Gro
cery
Sto
res
1,62
484
5%1.
96$2
8,94
6.11
$31,
719
0.91
452311
War
eh
ou
se C
lub
s an
d S
up
erc
en
ters
1,53
494
6%3.
26$3
4,08
8.37
$34,
899
0.98
623110
Nu
rsin
g C
are
Fac
ilit
ies
(Ski
lle
d N
urs
ing
Faci
liti
es)
1,11
9-6
0-5
%2.
15$4
4,31
8.64
$43,
152
1.03
902999
Stat
e G
ove
rnm
en
t, E
xclu
din
g Ed
uca
tio
n a
nd
Ho
spit
als
876
496%
1.19
$50,
122.
11$8
6,28
10.
58
NA
ICS
De
scri
pti
on
Fore
cast
Gro
wth
,
2019
-202
420
19 J
ob
s20
19 T
ota
l
Earn
ings
2019
Nat
ion
al
Tota
l
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(US=
1)
2019
LQ
(US=
1.00
)
Ne
t%
41-2
031
Re
tail
Sal
esp
ers
on
s2,
781
160
6%45
01.
89$1
1.98
$11.
651.
03
41-2
011
Cas
hie
rs1,
840
282%
358
1.57
$10.
45$1
0.78
0.97
29-1
141
Re
gist
ere
d N
urs
es
1,49
172
5%95
1.52
$32.
43$3
4.46
0.94
35-3
031
Wai
ters
an
d W
aitr
ess
es
1,46
815
010
%32
61.
74$9
.28
$10.
470.
89
35-3
021
Co
mb
ine
d F
oo
d P
rep
arat
ion
an
d S
erv
ing
Wo
rke
rs1,
287
209
16%
289
1.06
$9.6
4$1
0.22
0.94
43-9
061
Off
ice
Cle
rks,
Ge
ne
ral
1,26
815
1%15
81.
14$1
4.19
$15.
740.
90
43-6
014
Secr
eta
rie
s an
d A
dm
inis
trat
ive
Ass
ista
nts
1,06
8-2
3-2
%12
01.
27$1
5.87
$17.
590.
90
43-5
081
Sto
ck C
lerk
s an
d O
rde
r Fi
lle
rs92
843
5%13
51.
38$1
1.05
$12.
360.
89
35-2
014
Co
oks
, Re
stau
ran
t90
315
017
%16
71.
99$1
2.91
$12.
751.
01
37-3
011
Lan
dsc
apin
g an
d G
rou
nd
ske
ep
ing
Wo
rke
rs88
212
1%11
82.
10$1
2.00
$13.
670.
88
2019
Nat
ion
al
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(US=
1)
Pro
ject
ed
An
nu
al
Op
en
ings
2019
Jo
bs
SOC
De
scri
pti
on
Fore
cast
Gro
wth
,
2019
-202
420
19 L
Q
(US=
1.00
)
2019
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Earn
ings
To
p 1
0 I
nd
ust
rie
s b
y E
mp
loy
me
nt
(6-D
igit
s N
AIC
S)1
2
To
p 1
0 O
ccu
pa
tio
ns
by
Em
plo
ym
en
t (5
-Dig
its
SO
C)1
2
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 10PAGE 4 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
51
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 11 FILED: 06/08/2020
FLORIDA’S ECONOMIC
AND DEMOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT
COLLIER COUNTY
52
Collie
r C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
1 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 2 U
niv
ersi
ty o
f Fl
ori
da,
Bu
reau
of
Eco
no
mic
an
d B
usi
nes
s R
esea
rch
(C
ou
nty
an
d S
tate
Pro
ject
ion
s);
3 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, A
CS
20
14
-20
18
. Co
un
ty M
ap: 4
U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, LEH
D O
n t
he
Map
.
Key
De
mo
grap
hic
Ind
icat
ors
C
olli
er
Flo
rid
a U
S P
op
ula
tio
n, 2
01
81
,2
378
,48
8
20
,840
,568
3
27,1
67
,43
4
Po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
, 20
10-2
01
8, c
ou
nt
56
,967
2
,49
4,7
45
18
,409
,329
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
010
-20
18
, per
cen
t 1
7.7
%
13
.3%
6
.0%
P
op
ula
tio
n, 2
02
52
428
,32
8
23
,050
,800
3
44,3
22
,50
0
Po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
, 20
18-2
02
5, p
erce
nt
13
.2%
1
0.4
%
5.2
%
Po
pu
lati
on
per
sq
uar
e m
ile, 2
018
1 1
89
389
9
3 M
edia
n a
ge1
50
.3
42
.5
38
.4
Age
co
mp
osi
tio
n1, 2
018
0
-17
yea
rs
21
.5%
1
9.9
%
22
.4%
18
-64
yea
rs4
6.3
%
59
.6%
6
1.6
%
65+
year
s3
2.2
%
20
.5%
1
6.0
%
Edu
cati
on
att
ain
men
t3 , 201
8 L
ess
than
hig
h s
cho
ol
14
.1%
1
2.0
%
12
.3%
H
igh
er s
cho
ol g
rad
uat
e o
r ab
ove
2
0.2
%
88
.0%
8
7.7
%
Ass
oci
ates
’ deg
ree
23
.5%
9
.8%
8
.4%
B
ach
elo
r's
deg
ree
or
hig
her
2
0.1
%
26
.8%
2
9.3
%
Med
ian
ho
use
ho
ld in
com
e1 , 2
018
$
65,6
75
$53
,26
7 $
60,2
93
Bel
ow
po
vert
y1, 2
018
1
0.6
%
13
.6%
1
1.8
%
•Fr
om
20
11-1
8, C
olli
er’s
po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
s
we
re la
rgel
y d
rive
n b
y n
et d
om
esti
c m
igra
tio
n.
Net
do
mes
tic
mig
rati
on
pea
ked
in 2
015
, at
ove
r 30
0%
of
the
oth
er t
wo
co
mp
on
ents
com
bin
ed.
•D
uri
ng
20
13-2
01
5, n
et n
atu
ral i
ncr
ease
was
esse
nti
ally
zer
o. H
ow
ever
, it
has
sin
ce t
urn
ed
slig
htl
y n
egat
ive.
•In
rec
ent
year
s, n
et in
tern
atio
nal
mig
rati
on
an
d
net
do
mes
tic
mig
rati
on
hav
e b
een
co
nve
rgin
g,
du
e to
exp
ansi
on
in t
he
form
er, a
nd
con
trac
tio
n in
th
e la
tter
.
Co
mp
on
en
ts o
f P
op
ula
tio
n1
,2
Ch
an
ge
-20
000
20
00
40
00
60
00
80
00
10
00
0
12
00
0
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
An
nu
al C
om
po
nen
ts o
f R
esid
ent
Pop
ula
tio
n C
han
ge (
20
11
-2
01
8)
Nat
ura
l In
cre
ase
Net
Mig
rati
on
, In
tern
atio
nal
Net
Mig
rati
on
, Do
mes
tic
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 11PAGE 1 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
53
Collie
r C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
5 EMSI
– Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, No
n-Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, an
d S
elf-
Emp
loye
d;
6 US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
7 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 8
Un
iver
sity
of
Flo
rid
a, B
ure
au o
f Ec
on
om
ic a
nd
Bu
sin
ess
Res
earc
h (
Co
un
ty a
nd
Sta
te P
roje
ctio
ns)
. 9 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, On
TheM
ap
Ap
plic
atio
n a
nd
LEH
D O
rigi
n-D
esti
nat
ion
Em
plo
ymen
t St
atis
tics
. *Fo
r ge
ogr
aph
ical
ly d
ista
nt
loca
tio
ns,
it is
like
ly t
o b
e se
aso
nal
wo
rk o
r a
chan
ge in
res
iden
ce d
uri
ng
the
year
.
Key
Eco
no
mic
Ind
icat
ors
C
olli
er
Flo
rid
a U
S Jo
bs4 , 2
019
167
,02
8
9,8
10,8
42
1
58,5
24
,65
1 C
han
ge (
%)
in jo
bs
fro
m 2
01
0 3
2%
2
3%
9
%
Pro
ject
ed e
mp
loym
ent
gro
wth
, 201
9 -
20
284
12
%
9.5
%
8%
N
um
ber
of
est
ablis
hm
ents
1 , 201
7 1
2,0
74
5
57,3
08
7
,86
0,6
74
Es
tab
lish
men
ts p
er 1
000
po
pu
lati
on
3
1
27
2
4
Ave
rage
ear
nin
gs5, 2
01
9 $
56,5
71
$
53,3
76
$61
,38
9 R
elat
ive
ear
nin
gs (
US
= 1
00%
) 9
2%
8
7%
100
%
Lab
or
forc
e p
arti
cip
atio
n r
ate
6 , 20
14
54
.5%
5
8.5
%
58
.5%
U
nem
plo
ymen
t ra
te5 (
Oct
, 201
9),
NSA
2
.9%
2
.9%
2
.9%
G
ross
reg
ion
al p
rod
uct
(m
illio
n)5 , 2
015
$
20,0
62
$
1,0
59,7
85
$20
,78
0,0
64
G
RP
per
cap
ita
$51
,95
2.7
8
$49
,00
7.8
5
$63
,84
.72
Po
pu
lati
on
Gro
wth
7,8
•C
olli
er C
ou
nty
’s p
op
ula
tio
n g
row
th
rate
has
vas
tly
ou
tpac
ed b
oth
th
e U
S
and
Flo
rid
a o
ver
the
last
20
yea
rs.
•C
olli
er’s
rap
id g
row
th is
like
ly a
fun
ctio
n o
f th
e am
ou
nt
of
avai
lab
lela
nd
fo
r h
ou
sin
g. C
olli
er is
th
e la
rges
tco
un
ty in
Flo
rid
a b
y la
nd
are
a,co
mp
risi
ng
app
roxi
mat
ely
2,3
05
squ
are
mile
s.
Co
mm
uti
ng
Pa
tte
rns,
20
17
9
20
19
, 52
.1%
20
19
, 34
.0% 2
01
9, 1
7.1
%
0%
20
%
40
%
60
%
80
%
Tota
l Po
pu
lati
on
Ind
exe
d t
o 2
00
0
CO
LLIE
R, F
LFL
OR
IDA
UN
ITED
STA
TES
71
,04
5
21
,18
6
3,7
64
2,5
89
2,2
64
1,5
29
1,1
41
1,0
82
1,0
07
98
2
9,7
83
Co
llie
r C
ou
nty
, FL
Lee
Co
un
ty, F
L
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
, FL
Pal
m B
each
Co
un
ty, F
L
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Sara
sota
Co
un
ty, F
L
Ch
arlo
tte
Co
un
ty, F
L
Man
atee
Co
un
ty, F
L
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es o
f R
esid
ence
fo
r Em
plo
yees
W
ork
ing
in C
olli
er C
ou
nty
*
71
,04
5
14
,78
1
4,3
17
3,7
03
3,6
77
2,6
11
2,1
72
1,6
10
1,3
69
1,1
89
10
,22
7
Co
llie
r C
ou
nty
, FL
Lee
Co
un
ty, F
L
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
, FL
Pal
m B
each
Co
un
ty, F
L
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
Sara
sota
Co
un
ty, F
L
Pin
ella
s C
ou
nty
, FL
Man
atee
Co
un
ty, F
L
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es W
her
e C
olli
er C
ou
nty
R
esi
den
ts A
re E
mp
loye
d*
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 11PAGE 2 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
54
Collie
r C
ounty
No
te:
Lab
els
in B
ub
ble
ch
arts
co
nta
in in
du
stry
sec
tor
nam
e an
d 2
01
9 e
mp
loym
ent.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
10EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
; 11
US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs; 12
Gro
wth
Man
agem
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Co
mp
reh
ensi
ve P
lan
nin
g Se
ctio
n –
Co
llier
Co
un
ty E
con
om
ic, D
em
ogr
aph
ic &
Co
mm
un
ity
Pro
file
Em
plo
ym
en
t T
ren
ds1
1
To
p I
nd
ust
ry S
ect
ors
(2
-Dig
it N
AIC
S)1
0
NA
ICs)
()(
)Em
plo
ym
en
t•
Co
llier
Co
un
ty e
xper
ien
ced
co
nsi
der
able
gro
wth
in a
ll b
ut
3 o
f it
s in
du
stri
es f
rom
201
2-2
019
.
•A
dd
itio
nal
ly, a
ll se
cto
rs b
ut
Uti
litie
s
exce
eded
75%
of
nat
ion
al a
vera
ge e
arn
ings
con
sid
erab
ly.
•C
on
stru
ctio
n w
as t
he
fast
est-
gro
win
g
ind
ust
ry s
ect
or
wit
h g
row
th o
f 7
5%.
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
($2
63,3
70
)
bel
on
gs t
o M
anag
emen
t o
f C
om
pan
ies
and
Ente
rpri
ses,
wh
ile t
he
low
est
corr
esp
on
ds
to
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
an
d F
oo
d S
ervi
ces
($30
,841
).
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
rel
ativ
e to
th
e
nat
ion
’s b
elo
ngs
to
Man
agem
ent
of
Co
mp
anie
s an
d E
nte
rpri
ses
($2
63,3
70
vs
$14
5,7
53
).
•C
olli
er C
ou
nty
’s e
mp
loym
ent
gro
wth
is h
igh
ly v
ola
tile
du
e
to t
he
larg
e ro
le t
hat
to
uri
sm h
as in
its
eco
no
my.
In
gen
eral
, it
exce
ed
s b
oth
Flo
rid
a an
d t
he
US.
•In
re
cen
t ye
ars
Co
llier
’s g
row
th h
as m
ore
clo
sely
mir
rore
d
that
of
Flo
rid
a. T
his
like
ly r
efle
cts
a sm
oo
thin
g o
f th
e
tou
rism
ind
ust
ry, a
s m
uch
of
the
seas
on
al p
op
ula
tio
n h
as
beg
un
to
sta
y u
nti
l lat
er in
th
e ye
ar12
.
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
an
d F
oo
d S
ervi
ces,
22
,38
7
Ret
ail T
rad
e, 2
2,2
48
Hea
lth
Car
e an
d S
oci
al
Ass
ista
nce
, 2
1,0
12
Co
nst
ruct
ion
, 19
,54
3
Go
vern
men
t, 1
4,2
94
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e an
d
Sup
po
rt a
nd
Was
te
Man
agem
ent
and
R
emed
iati
on
Ser
vice
s,
11
,38
5
Oth
er S
ervi
ces
(exc
ept
Pu
blic
Ad
min
istr
atio
n),
9
,76
6
Art
s,
Ente
rtai
nm
ent,
an
d R
ecre
atio
n,
7,7
35
Pro
fess
ion
al, S
cien
tifi
c,
and
Tec
hn
ical
Ser
vice
s,
7,5
68
Rea
l Est
ate
and
Ren
tal a
nd
Le
asin
g, 5
,53
7
$0
$20,
000
$40,
000
$60,
000
$80,
000
$100
,00
0
$120
,00
0
-10
%0
%1
0%
20
%3
0%
40
%5
0%
60
%7
0%
80
%9
0%
Average Earnings per Worker
Per
cen
t C
han
ge in
Em
plo
ymen
t, 2
01
2-2
01
9
Top
10
Ind
ust
rie
s b
y Em
plo
yme
nt
(20
12
-20
19
)
Bel
ow
75
% o
f U
S Ea
rnin
gs p
erW
ork
erB
etw
een
75
% a
nd
10
0%
Ab
ove
10
0%
of
US
Earn
ings
per
Wo
rker
-6.0
%
-4.0
%
-2.0
%
0.0
%
2.0
%
4.0
%
6.0
%Em
plo
yme
nt
Gro
wth
, Pe
rcen
t C
han
ge, Y
ear
ove
r Y
ear
Flo
rid
aC
olli
er
Un
ited
Sta
tes
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 11PAGE 3 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
55
Collie
r C
ounty
No
tes:
LQ
’s >
= th
an 1
.25
are
hig
hlig
hte
d. E
arn
ings
ab
ove
th
e re
gio
nal
ave
rage
ear
nin
gs f
or
all i
nd
ust
ries
of
$5
6,5
71
an
d o
ccu
pat
ion
s o
f $
23
.38
per
ho
ur
are
hig
hlig
hte
d.
Rel
ativ
e Ea
rnin
gs a
bo
ve t
he
US
are
in g
reen
, wh
ile e
arn
ings
bel
ow
th
e U
S ar
e re
d.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
13 EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
;
NA
ICS
De
scri
pti
on
2
019
Jo
bs
Fore
cast
Gro
wth
, 2
019
-202
4
201
9 L
Q
(US=
1.0
0)
201
9 T
ota
l Ea
rnin
gs
201
9
Nat
ion
al
Tota
l
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(U
S=1
) N
et
%
7225
11
Fu
ll-Se
rvic
e R
esta
ura
nts
1
2,0
45
12
,045
2
105
1
7%
2.1
6
$30
,57
2.9
9
$25
,78
0
1.1
9
9039
99
Lo
cal G
ove
rnm
ent
6,4
91
6
,49
1
533
8
%
1.1
1
$80
,67
4.2
9
$80
,94
1
1.0
0
9036
11
El
emen
tary
an
d S
eco
nd
ary
Sch
oo
ls
5,5
50
5
,55
0
-40
%
0.7
6
$67
,42
7.0
1
$70
,29
6
0.9
6
7139
10
G
olf
Co
urs
es a
nd
Co
un
try
Clu
bs
4,9
94
4
,99
4
33
1%
1
3.0
4
$46
,87
4.2
9
$32
,30
2
1.4
5
6221
10
G
ener
al M
edic
al a
nd
Su
rgic
al H
osp
ital
s 4
,83
2
4,8
32
5
801
2%
1.0
1
$72
,51
3.9
7
$80
,66
8
0.9
0
7211
10
H
ote
ls (
exce
pt
Cas
ino
Ho
tels
) an
d M
ote
ls
4,4
69
4
,46
9
-102
-2%
2.6
6
$41
,60
6.7
4
$36
,45
5
1.1
4
5617
30
La
nd
scap
ing
Serv
ices
4
,39
1
4,3
91
4
571
0%3
.59
$
40,6
01
.24
$
37,6
59
1
.08
4451
10
Su
per
mar
kets
an
d O
ther
Gro
cery
Sto
res
4,1
64
4
,16
4
196
5%
1.6
1
$32
,86
7.3
8
$31
,71
9
1.0
4
6211
11
O
ffic
es o
f P
hys
icia
ns
3
,76
3
3,7
63
6
121
6%1
.41
$
118
,842
.06
$
112
,599
1
.06
7225
13
Li
mit
ed-S
ervi
ce R
esta
ura
nts
3
,46
9
3,4
69
4
621
3%0
.76
$
20,2
43
.77
$
19,3
16
1
.05
SOC
D
esc
rip
tio
n
201
9 J
ob
s
Fore
cast
G
row
th, 2
019
-2
024
Pro
ject
ed
An
nu
al
Op
enin
gs
201
9 L
Q
(US=
1.0
0)
201
9
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y Ea
rnin
gs
201
9
Nat
ion
al
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(U
S=1
) N
et
%
41
-203
1
Ret
ail S
ales
per
son
s 6
,32
7
6,3
27
2
23
4%
9
85
985
1
.37
$
12.8
1
$11
.65
1
.10
3
5-3
031
W
aite
rs a
nd
Wai
tres
ses
5,7
59
5
,75
9
690
1
2%
1,3
10
1
,31
0
2.1
8
$11
.44
$
10.4
7
1.0
9
41
-201
1
Cas
hie
rs
4,6
99
4
,69
9
106
2
%
922
9
22
1.2
8
$10
.70
$
10.7
8
0.9
9
37
-301
1
Lan
dsc
apin
g an
d G
rou
nd
skee
pin
g W
ork
ers
4,4
38
4
,43
8
364
8
%
669
6
69
3.3
8
$13
.67
$
13.6
7
1.0
0
35
-201
4
Co
oks
, Res
tau
ran
t 4
,04
3
4,0
43
6
96
17%
7
55
755
2
.85
$
15.0
2
$12
.75
1
.18
3
5-3
021
C
om
bin
ed F
oo
d P
rep
arat
ion
an
d S
ervi
ng
Wo
rker
s 3
,49
8
3,4
98
5
84
17%
7
89
789
0
.92
$
10.6
8
$10
.22
1
.04
37
-201
1
Jan
ito
rs a
nd
Cle
aner
s 3
,25
9
3,2
59
5
59
17%
5
77
577
1
.24
$
12.0
9
$12
.58
0
.96
4
3-9
061
O
ffic
e C
lerk
s, G
en
eral
3
,18
0
3,1
80
1
75
6%
4
28
428
0
.92
$
15.7
5
$15
.74
1
.00
3
7-2
012
M
aid
s an
d H
ou
seke
ep
ing
Cle
aner
s 2
,83
8
2,8
38
3
8
1%
3
95
395
1
.88
$
12.4
2
$11
.35
1
.09
4
3-6
014
Se
cret
arie
s an
d A
dm
inis
trat
ive
Ass
ista
nts
2
,74
1
2,7
41
3
5
1%
3
20
320
1
.04
$
17.0
4
$17
.59
0
.97
To
p 1
0 I
nd
ust
rie
s b
y E
mp
loy
me
nt
(6-D
igit
s N
AIC
S)1
3
To
p 1
0 O
ccu
pa
tio
ns
by
Em
plo
ym
en
t (5
-Dig
its
SO
C)1
3
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 11PAGE 4 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
56
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 12 FILED: 06/08/2020
FLORIDA’S ECONOMIC
AND DEMOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT
DUVAL COUNTY
57
Duval C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
1 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 2 U
niv
ersi
ty o
f Fl
ori
da,
Bu
reau
of
Eco
no
mic
an
d B
usi
nes
s R
esea
rch
(C
ou
nty
an
d S
tate
Pro
ject
ion
s);
3 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, A
CS
20
14
-20
18
. Co
un
ty M
ap: 4
U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, LEH
D O
n t
he
Map
.
Key
De
mo
grap
hic
Ind
icat
ors
D
uva
l Fl
ori
da
US
Po
pu
lati
on
, 20
18
1,2
9
50,1
81
2
0,8
40,5
68
327
,16
7,4
34
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
010
-20
18
, co
un
t 8
5,9
14
2,4
94
,745
1
8,4
09,3
29
Po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
, 20
10-2
01
8, p
erce
nt
9.9
%
13
.3%
6
.0%
P
op
ula
tio
n, 2
02
52
1,0
03
,884
2
3,0
50,8
00
344
,32
2,5
00
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
018
-20
25
, per
cen
t 5
.7%
1
0.4
%
5.2
%
Po
pu
lati
on
per
sq
uar
e m
ile, 2
018
1 8
38
389
9
3 M
edia
n a
ge1
36
.1
42
.5
38
.4
Age
co
mp
osi
tio
n1, 2
018
0
-17
yea
rs
29
.4%
1
9.9
%
22
.4%
18
-64
yea
rs5
6.6
%
59
.6%
6
1.6
%
65+
year
s1
4.0
%
20
.5%
1
6.0
%
Edu
cati
on
att
ain
men
t3 , 201
8 L
ess
than
hig
h s
cho
ol
10
.4%
1
2.0
%
12
.3%
H
igh
er s
cho
ol g
rad
uat
e o
r ab
ove
2
1.3
%
88
.0%
8
7.7
%
Ass
oci
ates
’ deg
ree
24
.8%
9
.8%
8
.4%
B
ach
elo
r's
deg
ree
or
hig
her
2
0.3
%
26
.8%
2
9.3
%
Med
ian
ho
use
ho
ld in
com
e1 , 2
018
$
53,4
73
$53
,26
7 $
60,2
93
Bel
ow
po
vert
y1, 2
018
1
4.5
%
13
.6%
1
1.8
%
•Fr
om
20
11-2
01
8, m
uch
of
the
po
pu
lati
on
chan
ge in
Du
val C
ou
nty
has
bee
n d
rive
n b
y
nat
ura
l in
crea
ses,
wh
ich
hav
e b
een
bet
wee
n
app
roxi
mat
ely
4,0
00
and
5,0
00 p
eop
le
ann
ual
ly.
•In
th
e ea
rly
201
0s,
lin
geri
ng
eff
ects
of
the
late
200
0s
ho
usi
ng
cris
is s
tifl
ed n
et d
om
esti
c
mig
rati
on
. Beg
inn
ing
in 2
014
it b
ecam
e
po
siti
ve a
nd
beg
an t
o c
om
pri
se a
larg
e p
ort
ion
of
tota
l po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
s.
•To
tal p
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ges
pea
ked
at
aro
un
d
14
,000
peo
ple
in 2
016
, wh
ich
co
inci
ded
wit
h a
pea
k in
net
do
mes
tic
mig
rati
on
.
Co
mp
on
en
ts o
f P
op
ula
tio
n1
,2
Ch
an
ge
-40
00
-20
000
20
00
40
00
60
00
80
00
10
00
0
12
00
0
14
00
0
16
00
0
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
An
nu
al C
om
po
nen
ts o
f R
esid
ent
Pop
ula
tio
n C
han
ge (
20
11
-2
01
8)
Nat
ura
l In
cre
ase
Net
Mig
rati
on
, In
tern
atio
nal
Net
Mig
rati
on
, Do
mes
tic
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 12PAGE 1 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
58
Duval C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
5 EMSI
– Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, No
n-Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, an
d S
elf-
Emp
loye
d;
6 US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
7 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 8
Un
iver
sity
of
Flo
rid
a, B
ure
au o
f Ec
on
om
ic a
nd
Bu
sin
ess
Res
earc
h (
Co
un
ty a
nd
Sta
te P
roje
ctio
ns)
. 9 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, On
TheM
ap
Ap
plic
atio
n a
nd
LEH
D O
rigi
n-D
esti
nat
ion
Em
plo
ymen
t St
atis
tics
. *Fo
r ge
ogr
aph
ical
ly d
ista
nt
loca
tio
ns,
it is
like
ly t
o b
e se
aso
nal
wo
rk o
r a
chan
ge in
res
iden
ce d
uri
ng
the
year
.
Key
Eco
no
mic
Ind
icat
ors
D
uva
l Fl
ori
da
US
Job
s4 , 201
9 5
68,6
64
9
,810
,84
2
158
,52
4,6
51
Ch
ange
(%
) in
job
s fr
om
20
10
17
%
23
%
9%
P
roje
cted
em
plo
ymen
t gr
ow
th, 2
019
- 2
028
4 8
%
9.5
%
8%
N
um
ber
of
est
ablis
hm
ents
1 , 201
7 2
5,7
50
5
57,3
08
7
,86
0,6
74
Es
tab
lish
men
ts p
er 1
000
po
pu
lati
on
2
7 2
7
24
A
vera
ge e
arn
ings
5, 2
01
9 $
63,8
37
$
53,3
76
$61
,38
9 R
elat
ive
ear
nin
gs (
US
= 1
00%
) 1
04%
8
7%
100
%
Lab
or
forc
e p
arti
cip
atio
n r
ate
6 , 20
14
64
.8%
5
8.5
%
58
.5%
U
nem
plo
ymen
t ra
te5 (
Oct
, 201
9),
NSA
3
.0%
2
.9%
2
.9%
G
ross
reg
ion
al p
rod
uct
(m
illio
n)5 , 2
015
$
68,9
29
$
1,0
59,7
85
$20
,78
0,0
64
G
RP
per
cap
ita
$71
,69
3.5
3
$49
,00
7.8
5
$63
,84
.72
Po
pu
lati
on
Gro
wth
7,8
•O
ver
the
last
20
yea
rs, D
uva
l’s
gro
wth
has
exc
eed
ed t
hat
of
the
US,
bu
t fa
llen
sig
nif
ican
tly
beh
ind
th
at o
f
Flo
rid
a as
a w
ho
le.
•D
esp
ite
two
maj
or
hu
rric
anes
in2
016
(H
urr
ican
e M
atth
ew)
and
201
7(H
urr
ican
e Ir
ma)
th
at s
ever
ely
dam
aged
mu
ch o
f th
e co
un
ty,
po
pu
lati
on
gro
wth
has
bee
nco
nst
ant
fro
m 2
014
on
war
d.
Co
mm
uti
ng
Pa
tte
rns,
20
17
9
27
4,2
49
34
,96
3
34
,85
2
12
,41
4
10
,25
8
9,9
50
6,3
32
4,6
94
4,3
90
4,3
65
69
,42
3
Du
val C
ou
nty
, FL
Cla
y C
ou
nty
, FL
St. J
oh
ns
Co
un
ty, F
L
Nas
sau
Co
un
ty, F
L
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
Vo
lusi
a C
ou
nty
, FL
Pin
ella
s C
ou
nty
, FL
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
, FL
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es o
f R
esid
ence
fo
r Em
plo
yees
Wo
rkin
g in
Du
val
Co
un
ty*
27
4,2
49
12
,99
1
12
,64
8
10
,48
8
7,5
93
3,9
60
3,2
97
3,2
80
3,1
57
3,1
36
35
,95
2
Du
val C
ou
nty
, FL
Cla
y C
ou
nty
, FL
St. J
oh
ns
Co
un
ty, F
L
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
, FL
Nas
sau
Co
un
ty, F
L
Vo
lusi
a C
ou
nty
, FL
Ala
chu
a C
ou
nty
, FL
Sem
ino
le C
ou
nty
, FL
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es W
her
e D
uva
l Co
un
ty
Re
sid
ents
Are
Em
plo
yed
*
20
19
, 22
.4%
20
19
, 34
.0%
20
19
, 17
.1%
0%
20
%
40
%
60
%
80
%
Tota
l Po
pu
lati
on
Ind
exe
d t
o 2
00
0
DU
VA
L, F
L
FLO
RID
A
UN
ITED
STA
TES
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 12PAGE 2 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
59
Duval C
ounty
No
te:
Lab
els
in B
ub
ble
ch
arts
co
nta
in in
du
stry
sec
tor
nam
e an
d 2
01
9 e
mp
loym
ent.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
10EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
; 11
US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
Em
plo
ym
en
t T
ren
ds1
1
To
p I
nd
ust
ry S
ect
ors
(2
-Dig
it N
AIC
S)1
0
NA
ICs)
()(
)Em
plo
ym
en
t•
Fro
m 2
012
-20
19
, Du
val C
ou
nty
exp
erie
nce
d
gro
wth
in e
very
ind
ust
ry e
xcep
t
Go
vern
men
t, w
hic
h c
on
trac
ted
by
7%
, an
d
Info
rmat
ion
, wh
ich
co
ntr
acte
d 5
%.
•M
inin
g, Q
uar
ryin
g, a
nd
Oil
and
Gas
Extr
acti
on
was
th
e fa
stes
t- g
row
ing
ind
ust
ry
sect
or
wit
h g
row
th o
f 1
64%
.
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
($1
57,9
57
)
bel
on
gs t
o M
anag
emen
t o
f C
om
pan
ies
and
Ente
rpri
ses,
wh
ile t
he
low
est
corr
esp
on
ds
to
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
an
d F
oo
d S
ervi
ces
($22
,64
1).
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
rel
ativ
e to
th
e
nat
ion
’s b
elo
ngs
to
Art
s, E
nte
rtai
nm
ent,
an
d
Rec
reat
ion
($6
0,1
90 v
s $
43,0
11).
•Fr
om
20
10-2
01
7, D
uva
l Co
un
ty h
ad h
igh
ly s
easo
nal
emp
loym
ent
tren
ds
that
tra
cke
d v
ery
clo
sely
wit
h F
lori
da.
Ho
wev
er, i
n la
te 2
018
to
ear
ly 2
01
9, D
uva
l had
a
do
wn
turn
th
at w
as s
ligh
tly
len
gth
ier
and
dee
per
th
an
that
exp
erie
nce
d b
y Fl
ori
da
ove
rall.
•D
uva
l’s m
edia
n a
ge, o
ne
of
the
low
est
in t
he
stat
e,
refl
ects
a c
on
tin
uin
g tr
end
of
incr
easi
ngl
y yo
un
g, jo
b
see
kin
g p
eop
le m
igra
tin
g to
th
e co
un
ty.
Hea
lth
Car
e an
d S
oci
al
Ass
ista
nce
, 7
5,7
19
Go
vern
men
t, 6
5,0
36
Ret
ail T
rad
e, 5
9,7
43
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
an
d F
oo
d
Serv
ices
, 48
,80
0
Fin
ance
an
d In
sura
nce
, 4
8,3
05
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e an
d
Sup
po
rt a
nd
W
aste
M
anag
emen
t an
d
Rem
edia
tio
n
Serv
ices
, 44
,29
4
Tran
spo
rtat
ion
an
d
War
eho
usi
ng,
39
,11
5
Co
nst
ruct
ion
, …
Pro
fess
ion
al, S
cien
tifi
c,
and
Tec
hn
ical
Ser
vice
s,
36
,06
0
Oth
er S
ervi
ces
(exc
ept
Pu
blic
Ad
min
istr
atio
n),
2
6,8
33
$0
$20,
000
$40,
000
$60,
000
$80,
000
$100
,00
0
$120
,00
0
-20
%-1
0%
0%
10
%2
0%
30
%4
0%
50
%6
0%
70
%
Average Earnings per Worker
Per
cen
t C
han
ge in
Em
plo
ymen
t, 2
01
2-2
01
9
Top
10
Ind
ust
rie
s b
y Em
plo
yme
nt
(20
12
-20
19
)
Bel
ow
75
% o
f U
S Ea
rnin
gs p
erW
ork
erB
etw
een
75
% a
nd
10
0%
Ab
ove
10
0%
of
US
Earn
ings
per
Wo
rker
-4.0
%
-3.0
%
-2.0
%
-1.0
%
0.0
%
1.0
%
2.0
%
3.0
%
4.0
%
5.0
%Em
plo
yme
nt
Gro
wth
, Pe
rcen
t C
han
ge, Y
ear
ove
r Y
ear
Flo
rid
aD
uva
lU
nit
ed S
tate
s
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 12PAGE 3 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
60
Duval C
ounty
No
tes:
LQ
’s >
= th
an 1
.25
are
hig
hlig
hte
d. E
arn
ings
ab
ove
th
e re
gio
nal
ave
rage
ear
nin
gs f
or
all i
nd
ust
ries
of
$6
3,8
37
an
d o
ccu
pat
ion
s o
f $
24
.16
per
ho
ur
are
hig
hlig
hte
d.
Rel
ativ
e Ea
rnin
gs a
bo
ve t
he
US
are
in g
reen
, wh
ile e
arn
ings
bel
ow
th
e U
S ar
e re
d.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
12EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
;
NA
ICS
De
scri
pti
on
2
019
Jo
bs
Fore
cast
G
row
th, 2
019
-2
024
2
019
LQ
(U
S=1
.00
) 2
019
To
tal
Earn
ings
201
9
Nat
ion
al
Tota
l
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(U
S=1
) N
et
%
6221
10
G
ener
al M
edic
al a
nd
Su
rgic
al H
osp
ital
s 2
1,3
73
21
,373
1
474
7
%
1.3
1
$68
,23
1.6
4
$80
,66
8
0.8
5
7225
11
Fu
ll-Se
rvic
e R
esta
ura
nts
1
8,7
00
18
,700
1
214
6
%
0.9
8
$24
,75
2.7
2
$25
,78
0
0.9
6
6211
11
O
ffic
es o
f P
hys
icia
ns
(exc
ept
Men
tal H
ealt
h S
pec
ialis
ts)
17
,394
1
7,3
94
232
5
13%
1
.91
$
114
,011
.02
$
112
,599
1
.01
7225
13
Li
mit
ed-S
ervi
ce R
esta
ura
nts
1
7,0
07
17
,007
1
684
1
0%
1.1
0
$18
,04
8.0
5
$19
,31
6
0.9
3
9011
99
Fe
der
al G
ove
rnm
ent,
Civ
ilian
, Exc
lud
ing
Po
stal
Ser
vice
1
4,1
50
14
,150
7
09
5%
1
.79
$
103
,162
.16
$
128
,275
0
.80
9039
99
Lo
cal G
ove
rnm
ent,
Exc
lud
ing
Edu
cati
on
an
d H
osp
ital
s 1
2,9
00
12
,900
2
82
2%
0
.65
$
75,0
09
.96
$
80,9
41
0
.93
5613
20
Te
mp
ora
ry H
elp
Ser
vice
s 1
1,8
75
11
,875
8
9
1%
1
.16
$
45,3
81
.53
$
41,0
36
1
.11
9036
11
El
emen
tary
an
d S
eco
nd
ary
Sch
oo
ls (
Loca
l Go
vern
men
t)
11
,445
1
1,4
45
330
3
%
0.4
6
$64
,10
6.4
5
$70
,29
6
0.9
1
5221
10
C
om
mer
cial
Ban
kin
g 1
0,6
51
10
,651
5
87
6%
2
.27
$
91,1
11
.78
$
104
,472
0
.87
9012
00
Fe
der
al G
ove
rnm
ent,
Mili
tary
1
0,5
59
10
,559
-2
449
-2
3%
1.6
0
$64
,70
1.0
0
$48
,38
7
1.3
4
SOC
D
esc
rip
tio
n
201
9 J
ob
s
Fore
cast
G
row
th, 2
019
-2
024
Pro
ject
ed
A
nn
ual
O
pen
ings
2
019
LQ
(U
S=1
.00
)
201
9
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y Ea
rnin
gs
201
9
Nat
ion
al
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(U
S=1
) N
et
%
43
-405
1
Cu
sto
mer
Ser
vice
Rep
rese
nta
tive
s 1
8,6
24
18
,624
5
95
3%
2
,64
5
2,6
45
1
.84
$
15.6
3
$16
.22
0
.96
4
1-2
031
R
etai
l Sal
esp
erso
ns
15
,449
1
5,4
49
542
4
%
2,4
03
2
,40
3
0.9
9
$11
.51
$
11.6
5
0.9
9
53
-706
2
Lab
ore
rs a
nd
Fre
igh
t 1
4,3
56
14
,356
1
584
1
1%
2,4
29
2
,42
9
1.3
7
$13
.20
$
13.5
8
0.9
7
43
-906
1
Off
ice
Cle
rks,
Ge
ner
al
12
,615
1
2,6
15
251
2
%
1,5
91
1
,59
1
1.0
7
$14
.95
$
15.7
4
0.9
5
41
-201
1
Cas
hie
rs
12
,364
1
2,3
64
329
3
%
2,4
39
2
,43
9
0.9
9
$10
.15
$
10.7
8
0.9
4
35
-302
1
Co
mb
ined
Fo
od
Pre
par
atio
n a
nd
Ser
vin
g W
ork
ers
11
,997
1
1,9
971
575
1
3%
2,5
83
2
,58
3
0.9
3
$9
.35
$
10.2
2
0.9
2
29
-114
1
Reg
iste
red
Nu
rses
1
1,3
41
11
,341
1
213
1
1%
876
8
76
1.0
8
$29
.40
$
34.4
6
0.8
5
53
-303
2
Hea
vy a
nd
Tra
cto
r-Tr
aile
r Tr
uck
Dri
vers
1
0,3
46
10
,346
6
82
7%
1
,35
9
1,3
59
1
.42
$
20.3
4
$20
.93
0
.97
3
5-3
031
W
aite
rs a
nd
Wai
tres
ses
9,5
08
9
,50
8
412
4
%
1,9
49
1
,94
9
1.0
6
$9
.40
$
10.4
7
0.9
0
43
-508
1
Sto
ck C
lerk
s an
d O
rder
Fill
ers
8,6
73
8
,67
3
536
6
%
1,3
01
1
,30
1
1.2
1
$12
.06
$
12.3
6
0.9
8
To
p 1
0 I
nd
ust
rie
s b
y E
mp
loy
me
nt
(6-D
igit
s N
AIC
S)1
2
To
p 1
0 O
ccu
pa
tio
ns
by
Em
plo
ym
en
t (5
-Dig
its
SO
C)1
2
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 12PAGE 4 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
61
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 13 FILED: 06/08/2020
FLORIDA’S ECONOMIC
AND DEMOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT
LEE COUNTY
62
Lee C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
1 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 2 U
niv
ersi
ty o
f Fl
ori
da,
Bu
reau
of
Eco
no
mic
an
d B
usi
nes
s R
esea
rch
(C
ou
nty
an
d S
tate
Pro
ject
ion
s);
3 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, A
CS
20
14
-20
18
. Co
un
ty M
ap: 4
U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, LEH
D O
n t
he
Map
.
-50
000
50
00
10
00
0
15
00
0
20
00
0
25
00
0
30
00
0
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
An
nu
al C
om
po
nen
ts o
f R
esid
ent
Pop
ula
tio
n C
han
ge (
20
11
-2
01
8)
Nat
ura
l In
cre
ase
Net
Mig
rati
on
, In
tern
atio
nal
Net
Mig
rati
on
, Do
mes
tic
Key
De
mo
grap
hic
Ind
icat
ors
Le
e Fl
ori
da
US
Po
pu
lati
on
, 20
18
1,2
7
54,6
10
2
0,8
40,5
68
327
,16
7,4
34
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
010
-20
18
, co
un
t 1
35,8
56
2
,49
4,7
45
18
,409
,329
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
010
-20
18
, per
cen
t 2
2.0
%
13
.3%
6
.0%
P
op
ula
tio
n, 2
02
52
855
,91
4
23
,050
,800
3
44,3
22
,50
0
Po
pu
lati
on
ch
ange
, 20
18-2
02
5, p
erce
nt
13
.4%
1
0.4
%
5.2
%
Po
pu
lati
on
per
sq
uar
e m
ile, 2
018
1 9
62
389
9
3 M
edia
n a
ge1
48
.1
42
.5
38
.4
Age
co
mp
osi
tio
n1, 2
018
0
-17
yea
rs
22
.2%
1
9.9
%
22
.4%
18
-64
yea
rs4
9.2
%
59
.6%
6
1.6
%
65+
year
s2
8.6
%
20
.5%
1
6.0
%
Edu
cati
on
att
ain
men
t3 , 201
8 L
ess
than
hig
h s
cho
ol
12
.6%
1
2.0
%
12
.3%
H
igh
er s
cho
ol g
rad
uat
e o
r ab
ove
2
1.5
%
88
.0%
8
7.7
%
Ass
oci
ates
’ deg
ree
23
.6%
9
.8%
8
.4%
B
ach
elo
r's
deg
ree
or
hig
her
1
8.0
%
26
.8%
2
9.3
%
Med
ian
ho
use
ho
ld in
com
e1 , 2
018
$
54,6
91
$53
,26
7 $
60,2
93
Bel
ow
po
vert
y1, 2
018
1
2.1
%
13
.6%
1
1.8
%
•Fr
om
20
11-1
8, n
et d
om
esti
c m
igra
tio
n
com
po
sed
a v
ast
maj
ori
ty o
f p
op
ula
tio
n
chan
ges
for
Lee
Co
un
ty.
•N
et n
atu
ral i
ncr
ease
s w
ere
esse
nti
ally
zer
o
fro
m 2
011
-20
15
, bu
t h
ave
sin
ce b
egu
n t
o b
e
neg
ativ
e.
•D
esp
ite
net
inte
rnat
ion
al m
igra
tio
n
con
trib
uti
ng
at le
ast
2,0
00 in
div
idu
als
ann
ual
ly,
net
do
mes
tic
mig
rati
on
has
bee
n o
ver
300
% o
f
net
inte
rnat
ion
al m
igra
tio
n e
very
yea
r, p
eaki
ng
at a
pp
roxi
mat
ely
21
,00
0 p
eop
le in
201
5.
Co
mp
on
en
ts o
f P
op
ula
tio
n1
,2
Ch
an
ge
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 13PAGE 1 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
63
Lee C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
5 EMSI
– Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, No
n-Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, an
d S
elf-
Emp
loye
d;
6 US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
7 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 8
Un
iver
sity
of
Flo
rid
a, B
ure
au o
f Ec
on
om
ic a
nd
Bu
sin
ess
Res
earc
h (
Co
un
ty a
nd
Sta
te P
roje
ctio
ns)
. 9 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, On
TheM
ap
Ap
plic
atio
n a
nd
LEH
D O
rigi
n-D
esti
nat
ion
Em
plo
ymen
t St
atis
tics
. *Fo
r ge
ogr
aph
ical
ly d
ista
nt
loca
tio
ns,
it is
like
ly t
o b
e se
aso
nal
wo
rk o
r a
chan
ge in
res
iden
ce d
uri
ng
the
year
.
Key
Eco
no
mic
Ind
icat
ors
Le
e Fl
ori
da
US
Job
s4 , 201
9 2
92,4
61
9
,810
,84
2
158
,52
4,6
51
Ch
ange
(%
) in
job
s fr
om
20
10
36
%
23
%
9%
P
roje
cted
em
plo
ymen
t gr
ow
th, 2
019
- 2
028
4 1
3%
9
.5%
8
%
Nu
mb
er o
f e
stab
lish
men
ts1 , 2
017
18
,79
7
557
,30
8
7,8
60
,67
4
Esta
blis
hm
ents
per
10
00 p
op
ula
tio
n
24
27
2
4
Ave
rage
ear
nin
gs5, 2
01
9 $
52,8
66
$
53,3
76
$61
,38
9 R
elat
ive
ear
nin
gs (
US
= 10
0%
) 8
6%
8
7%
100
%
Lab
or
forc
e p
arti
cip
atio
n r
ate
6 , 20
14
53
.9%
5
8.5
%
58
.5%
U
nem
plo
ymen
t ra
te5 (
Oct
, 201
9),
NSA
2
.8%
2
.9%
2
.9%
G
ross
reg
ion
al p
rod
uct
(m
illio
n)5 , 2
015
$
30,4
02
$
1,0
59,7
85
$20
,78
0,0
64
G
RP
per
cap
ita
$39
,31
2.6
6
$49
,00
7.8
5
$63
,84
.72
Po
pu
lati
on
Gro
wth
7,8
•O
ver
the
last
20
yea
rs, L
ee C
ou
nty
and
th
e as
soci
ated
Fo
rt M
yers
MSA
hav
e b
een
am
on
gst
the
fast
est
gro
win
g ar
eas
in t
he
nat
ion
.
•Fo
llow
ing
a b
rief
slo
wd
ow
n a
rou
nd
200
7 t
hat
was
like
ly p
reci
pit
ated
by
the
ho
usi
ng
cris
is, p
op
ula
tio
n g
row
thre
turn
ed t
o p
rio
r le
vels
.
Co
mm
uti
ng
Pa
tte
rns,
20
17
9
20
19
, 72
.7%
20
19
, 34
.0%
20
19
, 17
.1%
0%
20
%
40
%
60
%
80
%
Tota
l Po
pu
lati
on
Ind
exe
d t
o 2
00
0
LEE,
FL
FLO
RID
AU
NIT
ED S
TATE
S
12
5,4
71
14
,78
1
6,1
98
5,6
19
4,6
93
4,2
65
3,8
39
3,1
96
2,8
64
2,7
07
22
,41
7
Lee
Co
un
ty, F
L
Co
llie
r C
ou
nty
, FL
Ch
arlo
tte
Co
un
ty, F
L
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
, FL
Pal
m B
each
Co
un
ty, F
L
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Sara
sota
Co
un
ty, F
L
Pin
ella
s C
ou
nty
, FL
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es o
f R
esid
ence
fo
r Em
plo
yees
Wo
rkin
g in
Lee
Co
un
ty*
12
5,4
71
21
,18
6
7,2
24
7,0
59
6,9
01
5,3
47
4,9
10
4,4
78
4,1
62
3,6
58
22
,46
3
Lee
Co
un
ty, F
L
Co
llie
r C
ou
nty
, FL
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
, FL
Pal
m B
each
Co
un
ty, F
L
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
Sara
sota
Co
un
ty, F
L
Pin
ella
s C
ou
nty
, FL
Ch
arlo
tte
Co
un
ty, F
L
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es W
her
e Le
e C
ou
nty
Res
iden
ts
Are
Em
plo
yed
*
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 13PAGE 2 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
64
Lee C
ounty
No
te:
Lab
els
in B
ub
ble
ch
arts
co
nta
in in
du
stry
sec
tor
nam
e an
d 2
01
9 e
mp
loym
ent.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
10EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
; 11
US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
Em
plo
ym
en
t T
ren
ds1
1
To
p I
nd
ust
ry S
ect
ors
(2
-Dig
it N
AIC
S)1
0
NA
ICs)
()(
)Em
plo
ym
en
t•
Fro
m 2
012
-20
19
, Lee
Co
un
ty e
xper
ien
ced
gro
wth
in a
ll o
f it
s la
rges
t in
du
stri
es.
•C
on
stru
ctio
n w
as t
he
fast
est-
gro
win
g
ind
ust
ry s
ect
or
wit
h g
row
th o
f 7
8%.
•In
form
atio
n, M
anag
emen
t o
f C
om
pan
ies
and
En
terp
rise
s, a
nd
Agr
icu
ltu
re c
on
trac
ted
du
rin
g th
is p
eri
od
.
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
($
115,
285
)
bel
on
gs t
o U
tilit
ies,
wh
ile t
he
low
est
corr
esp
on
ds
to A
cco
mm
od
atio
n a
nd
Fo
od
Serv
ices
($
26,0
41
).
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
rel
ativ
e to
th
e
nat
ion
’s b
elo
ngs
to
Hea
lth
Car
e an
d S
oci
al
Ass
ista
nce
($6
4,7
12 v
s $
61,4
90).
•Le
e C
ou
nty
has
4 in
du
stri
es w
ho
se e
arn
ings
are
bel
ow
th
e n
atio
nal
ave
rage
, th
e lo
we
st
of
wh
ich
is In
form
atio
n, a
t 6
0%.
•Fr
om
20
10-2
01
7, L
ee C
ou
nty
had
em
plo
ymen
t gr
ow
th
that
exc
eed
ed t
hat
of
Flo
rid
a. A
t it
s p
eak,
Lee
’s
emp
loym
ent
gro
wth
rat
e w
as g
reat
er t
han
6%
, an
d
surp
asse
d F
lori
da
and
th
e U
S b
y o
ver
3% a
nd
ove
r 4
%,
resp
ecti
vely
.
•In
late
201
7, L
ee e
xper
ien
ced
a b
rief
per
iod
of
con
trac
tio
n a
fte
r su
ffer
ing
min
or
dam
age
fro
m H
urr
ican
e
Irm
a, w
hic
h m
ade
lan
dfa
ll as
a c
ateg
ory
2.
Go
vern
men
t, 4
3,7
38
Ret
ail T
rad
e, 4
1,9
69
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
an
d F
oo
d
Serv
ices
, 34
,79
5
Co
nst
ruct
ion
, 34
,63
3
Hea
lth
Car
e an
d S
oci
al
Ass
ista
nce
, 2
8,7
14
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e an
d
Sup
po
rt a
nd
Was
te
Man
agem
ent
and
R
emed
iati
on
Ser
vice
s,
20
,16
9
Pro
fess
ion
al, S
cien
tifi
c,
and
Tec
hn
ical
Ser
vice
s,
17
,06
2
Oth
er S
ervi
ces
(exc
ept
Pu
blic
Ad
min
istr
atio
n),
1
3,8
06
Rea
l Est
ate
and
Ren
tal a
nd
Le
asin
g, 9
,25
1
Art
s, E
nte
rtai
nm
ent,
an
d
Rec
reat
ion
, 8,9
71
$0
$10,
000
$20,
000
$30,
000
$40,
000
$50,
000
$60,
000
$70,
000
$80,
000
$90,
000
0%
10
%2
0%
30
%4
0%
50
%6
0%
70
%8
0%
90
%1
00
%
Average Earnings per Worker
Per
cen
t C
han
ge in
Em
plo
ymen
t, 2
01
2-2
01
9
Top
10
Ind
ust
rie
s b
y Em
plo
yme
nt
(20
12
-20
19
)
Bel
ow
75
% o
f U
S Ea
rnin
gs p
erW
ork
erB
etw
een
75
% a
nd
10
0%
Ab
ove
10
0%
of
US
Earn
ings
per
Wo
rker
-4.0
%
-2.0
%
0.0
%
2.0
%
4.0
%
6.0
%Em
plo
yme
nt
Gro
wth
, Pe
rce
nt
Ch
ange
, Ye
ar o
ver
Ye
ar
Flo
rid
aLe
eU
nit
ed S
tate
s
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 13PAGE 3 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
65
Lee C
ounty
No
tes:
LQ
’s >
= th
an 1
.25
are
hig
hlig
hte
d. E
arn
ings
ab
ove
th
e re
gio
nal
ave
rage
ear
nin
gs f
or
all i
nd
ust
ries
of
$5
2,8
66
an
d o
ccu
pat
ion
s o
f $
22
.64
per
ho
ur
are
hig
hlig
hte
d.
Rel
ativ
e Ea
rnin
gs a
bo
ve t
he
US
are
in g
reen
, wh
ile e
arn
ings
bel
ow
th
e U
S ar
e re
d.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
12EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
;
Ne
t%
722511
Fu
ll-S
erv
ice
Re
sta
ura
nts
18
,54
31
82
91
0%
1.9
0$
27
,07
7.5
9$
25
,78
01
.05
903622
Ho
spit
als
1
2,6
04
10
32
8%
10
.50
$8
3,0
68
.08
$8
9,9
76
0.9
2
903611
Ele
me
nta
ry a
nd
Se
con
da
ry S
cho
ols
1
1,5
05
31
03
%0
.90
$5
6,6
20
.66
$7
0,2
96
0.8
1
903999
Loca
l G
ov
ern
me
nt
9,6
75
34
64
%0
.95
$7
7,0
11
.00
$8
0,9
41
0.9
5
722513
Lim
ite
d-S
erv
ice
Re
sta
ura
nts
8,1
61
96
11
2%
1.0
3$
19
,49
0.8
4$
19
,31
61
.01
621111
Off
ice
s o
f P
hy
sici
an
s 7
,82
19
39
12
%1
.67
$1
06
,06
3.5
2$
11
2,5
99
0.9
4
445110
Su
pe
rma
rke
ts a
nd
Oth
er
Gro
cery
Sto
res
6,9
57
17
43
%1
.53
$3
1,5
22
.19
$3
1,7
19
0.9
9
561730
Lan
dsc
ap
ing
Se
rvic
es
6,0
14
89
41
5%
2.8
0$
39
,63
8.6
6$
37
,65
91
.05
238220
Plu
mb
ing
, H
ea
tin
g,
an
d A
C C
on
tra
cto
rs5
,21
98
54
16
%2
.34
$5
9,5
26
.89
$7
0,1
55
0.8
5
721110
Ho
tels
(e
xce
pt
Ca
sin
o H
ote
ls)
an
d M
ote
ls5
,17
92
70
5%
1.7
6$
33
,80
9.0
0$
36
,45
50
.93
20
19
Jo
bs
20
19
To
tal
Ea
rnin
gs
20
19
Na
tio
na
l
To
tal
Re
lati
ve
Ea
rnin
gs
(US
=1
)
20
19
LQ
(US
=1
.
00
)
NA
ICS
De
scri
pti
on
Fo
reca
st G
row
th,
20
19
-20
24
Ne
t%
41-2
031
Re
tail
Sal
esp
ers
on
s13
,807
509
4%2,
156
1.71
$10.
65$1
1.65
0.91
35-3
031
Wai
ters
an
d W
aitr
ess
es
8,44
865
68%
1,81
61.
83$9
.33
$10.
470.
89
41-2
011
Cas
hie
rs7,
727
127
2%1,
504
1.20
$10.
39$1
0.78
0.96
35-3
021
Co
mb
ine
d F
oo
d P
rep
arat
ion
an
d S
erv
ing
Wo
rke
rs6,
805
871
13%
1,45
91.
02$9
.88
$10.
220.
97
37-3
011
Lan
dsc
apin
g an
d G
rou
nd
ske
ep
ing
Wo
rke
rs6,
757
778
12%
1,07
72.
94$1
2.21
$13.
670.
89
43-4
051
Cu
sto
me
r Se
rvic
e R
ep
rese
nta
tive
s6,
338
238
4%90
91.
22$1
3.60
$16.
220.
84
43-9
061
Off
ice
Cle
rks,
Ge
ne
ral
6,12
136
16%
831
1.01
$14.
58$1
5.74
0.93
29-1
141
Re
gist
ere
d N
urs
es
5,73
359
810
%43
91.
06$3
1.64
$34.
460.
92
47-2
061
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Lab
ore
rs5,
341
674
13%
764
2.00
$14.
85$1
6.49
0.90
43-6
014
Secr
eta
rie
s an
d A
dm
inis
trat
ive
Ass
ista
nts
4,56
612
43%
549
0.99
$16.
32$1
7.59
0.93
2019
Nat
ion
al
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(US=
1)
Pro
ject
ed
An
nu
al
Op
en
ings
2019
Jo
bs
2019
LQ
(US=
1.00
)
2019
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Earn
ings
SOC
De
scri
pti
on
Fore
cast
Gro
wth
,
2019
-202
4
To
p 1
0 I
nd
ust
rie
s b
y E
mp
loy
me
nt
(6-D
igit
s N
AIC
S)1
2
To
p 1
0 O
ccu
pa
tio
ns
by
Em
plo
ym
en
t (5
-Dig
its
SO
C)1
2
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 13PAGE 4 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
66
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 14 FILED: 06/08/2020
FLORIDA’S ECONOMIC
AND DEMOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT
MIAMI/DADE COUNTY
67
Mia
mi-
Dade C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
1 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 2 U
niv
ersi
ty o
f Fl
ori
da,
Bu
reau
of
Eco
no
mic
an
d B
usi
nes
s R
esea
rch
(C
ou
nty
an
d S
tate
Pro
ject
ion
s);
3 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, A
CS
20
14
-20
18
. Co
un
ty M
ap: 4
U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, LEH
D O
n t
he
Map
.
Key
De
mo
grap
hic
Ind
icat
ors
M
iam
i-D
ade
Flo
rid
a U
S P
op
ula
tio
n, 2
01
81
,2
2,7
61
,581
2
0,8
40,5
68
327
,16
7,4
34
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
010
-20
18
, co
un
t 2
63,5
68
2
,49
4,7
45
18
,409
,329
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
010
-20
18
, per
cen
t 1
0.6
%
13
.3%
6
.0%
P
op
ula
tio
n, 2
02
52
2,9
65
,680
2
3,0
50,8
00
344
,32
2,5
00
P
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge, 2
018
-20
25
, per
cen
t 6
.7%
1
0.4
%
5.2
%
Po
pu
lati
on
per
sq
uar
e m
ile, 2
018
1 1
316
3
89
93
Med
ian
age
1 4
0.1
4
2.5
3
8.4
A
ge c
om
po
siti
on
1, 2
018
0
-17
yea
rs
26%
1
9.9
%
22
.4%
18
-64
yea
rs5
7.8
%
59
.6%
6
1.6
%
65+
year
s1
6.2
%
20
.5%
1
6.0
%
Edu
cati
on
att
ain
men
t3 , 201
8 L
ess
than
hig
h s
cho
ol
18
.5%
1
2.0
%
12
.3%
H
igh
sch
oo
l gra
du
ate
or
abo
ve
81
.5%
8
8.0
%
87
.7%
A
sso
ciat
es’ d
egre
e 2
2.6
%
9.8
%
8.4
%
Bac
hel
or'
s d
egre
e o
r h
igh
er
19
.2%
2
6.8
%
29
.3%
M
edia
n h
ou
seh
old
inco
me
1 , 201
8
$48
,98
2
$53
,26
7 $
60,2
93
Bel
ow
po
vert
y1, 2
018
1
6%
13
.6%
1
1.8
%
•Fr
om
20
10-2
01
1, M
iam
i-D
ade
exp
erie
nce
d
po
siti
ve n
et d
om
esti
c m
igra
tio
n. H
ow
ever
, net
do
mes
tic
mig
rati
on
has
bee
n n
egat
ive
ever
sin
ce, l
ikel
y re
flec
tin
g re
sid
ents
bei
ng
dis
pla
ced
by
incr
easi
ng
ho
usi
ng
cost
s p
ost
-fin
anci
al c
risi
s
reco
very
.
•In
201
7 a
nd
20
18, n
et d
om
esti
c m
igra
tio
n w
as
sub
stan
tial
ly m
ore
neg
ativ
e (a
rou
nd
-3
0,0
00
to
aro
un
d -
50,0
00)
, as
a re
sult
of
sub
stan
tial
ho
usi
ng
sto
ck d
amag
e fo
llow
ing
Hu
rric
ane
Irm
a.
Co
mp
on
en
ts o
f P
op
ula
tio
n1
,2
Ch
an
ge
-60
00
0
-40
00
0
-20
00
00
20
00
0
40
00
0
60
00
0
80
00
0
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
An
nu
al C
om
po
nen
ts o
f R
esid
ent
Pop
ula
tio
n C
han
ge (
20
11
-2
01
8)
Nat
ura
l In
cre
ase
Net
Mig
rati
on
, In
tern
atio
nal
Net
Mig
rati
on
, Do
mes
tic
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 14PAGE 1 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
68
Mia
mi-
Dade C
ounty
Dat
a So
urc
es:
5 EMSI
– Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, No
n-Q
CEW
Em
plo
yees
, an
d S
elf-
Emp
loye
d;
6 US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
7 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, Po
pu
lati
on
Div
isio
n; 8
Un
iver
sity
of
Flo
rid
a, B
ure
au o
f Ec
on
om
ic a
nd
Bu
sin
ess
Res
earc
h (
Co
un
ty a
nd
Sta
te P
roje
ctio
ns)
. 9 U.S
. Cen
sus
Bu
reau
, On
TheM
ap
Ap
plic
atio
n a
nd
LEH
D O
rigi
n-D
esti
nat
ion
Em
plo
ymen
t St
atis
tics
. *Fo
r ge
ogr
aph
ical
ly d
ista
nt
loca
tio
ns,
it is
like
ly t
o b
e se
aso
nal
wo
rk o
r a
chan
ge in
res
iden
ce d
uri
ng
the
year
.
Key
Eco
no
mic
Ind
icat
ors
M
iam
i-D
ade
Flo
rid
a U
S Jo
bs4 , 2
019
1,3
41
,14
5
9,8
10,8
42
1
58,5
24
,65
1 C
han
ge (
%)
in jo
bs
fro
m 2
01
0 2
2%
2
3%
9
%
Pro
ject
ed e
mp
loym
ent
gro
wth
, 201
9 -
20
284
10%
9
.5%
8
%
Nu
mb
er o
f e
stab
lish
men
ts1 , 2
017
84
,80
3
557
,30
8
7,8
60
,67
4
Esta
blis
hm
ents
per
10
00 p
op
ula
tio
n
30
2
7
24
A
vera
ge e
arn
ings
5, 2
020
$
63,1
39
$
58
,85
5
$67
,97
9
Rel
ativ
e e
arn
ings
(U
S =
100
%)
93%
8
7%
100
%
Lab
or
forc
e p
arti
cip
atio
n r
ate
6 , 20
19
6
3%
5
8.5
%
58
.5%
U
nem
plo
ymen
t ra
te5 (
Oct
, 201
9),
NSA
2
.9%
2
.9%
2
.9%
G
ross
reg
ion
al p
rod
uct
(m
illio
n)5 , 2
015
$
167
,29
2
$1
,059
,785
$
20,7
80
,06
4
GR
P p
er c
apit
a $
59,9
93
.33
$
49,0
07
.85
$
63,8
4.7
2
Po
pu
lati
on
Gro
wth
7,8
•Fr
om
20
00
-20
07, M
iam
i-D
ade’
s
po
pu
lati
on
gre
w a
t a
rate
sim
ilar
to
that
of
the
US.
•B
egin
nin
g in
200
8, M
iam
i-D
ade
beg
an t
o g
row
mu
ch f
aste
r, w
ith
an
aver
age
gro
wth
rat
e n
earl
y e
qu
al t
oth
e st
ate
of
Flo
rid
a fr
om
200
8-2
019
.
•It
is p
red
icte
d t
hat
th
e co
un
ty w
illex
per
ien
ce s
imila
rly
hea
lth
y gr
ow
thra
tes
fro
m 2
020
to
20
25, a
s w
ell.
Co
mm
uti
ng
Pa
tte
rns,
20
17
9
69
9,1
62
13
9,3
06
30
,08
9
8,9
51
7,9
18
7,0
59
5,5
87
3,6
77
3,5
72
3,4
92
38
,80
3
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
, FL
Pal
m B
each
Co
un
ty, F
L
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Lee
Co
un
ty, F
L
Mo
nro
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Co
llie
r C
ou
nty
, FL
Pin
ella
s C
ou
nty
, FL
St. L
uci
e C
ou
nty
, FL
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es
of
Re
sid
en
ce f
or
Emp
loye
es
Wo
rkin
g in
Mia
mi-
Dad
e
Co
un
ty*
69
9,1
62
11
5,4
66
30
,20
1
11
,40
9
8,7
93
5,6
19
4,6
51
4,3
65
3,7
64
2,5
52
26
,75
2
Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Bro
war
d C
ou
nty
, FL
Pal
m B
each
Co
un
ty, F
L
Ora
nge
Co
un
ty, F
L
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
, FL
Lee
Co
un
ty, F
L
Mo
nro
e C
ou
nty
, FL
Du
val C
ou
nty
, FL
Co
llie
r C
ou
nty
, FL
Pin
ella
s C
ou
nty
, FL
All
Oth
er L
oca
tio
ns
Top
9 C
ou
nti
es W
her
e M
iam
i-D
ade
Co
un
ty
Res
ide
nts
Are
Em
plo
yed
*
20
19
, 24
.16
%
20
19
, 34
.0%
20
19
, 17
.1%
0%
20
%
40
%
60
%
Tota
l Po
pu
lati
on
Ind
exed
to
20
00
MIA
MI-
DA
DE,
FL
FLO
RID
A
UN
ITED
STA
TES
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 14PAGE 2 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
69
Mia
mi-
Dade C
ounty
No
te:
Lab
els
in B
ub
ble
ch
arts
co
nta
in in
du
stry
sec
tor
nam
e an
d 2
01
9 e
mp
loym
ent.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
10EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
; 11
US
Bu
reau
of
Lab
or
Stat
isti
cs
Em
plo
ym
en
t T
ren
ds1
1
To
p I
nd
ust
ry S
ect
ors
(2
-Dig
it N
AIC
S)1
0
NA
ICs)
()(
)Em
plo
ym
en
t•
Fro
m 2
012
-20
19
, Mia
mi-
Dad
e C
ou
nty
exp
erie
nce
d g
row
th in
all
of
its
larg
est
ind
ust
ries
.
•C
on
stru
ctio
n w
as t
he
fast
est-
gro
win
g
ind
ust
ry s
ect
or
wit
h g
row
th o
f 5
4%.
•U
tilit
ies
was
th
e o
nly
ind
ust
ry w
hic
h
con
trac
ted
du
rin
g th
is p
erio
d.
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
($
161,
227
)
bel
on
gs t
o M
anag
emen
t o
f C
om
pan
ies
and
Ente
rpri
ses,
wh
ile t
he
low
est
corr
esp
on
ds
to
Oth
er S
ervi
ces
(exc
ept
Pu
blic
Ad
min
istr
atio
n)
($26
,041
).
•Th
e h
igh
est
aver
age
earn
ings
rel
ativ
e to
th
e
nat
ion
’s b
elo
ngs
to
Art
s, E
nte
rtai
nm
ent,
an
d
Rec
reat
ion
($6
5,5
27
vs
$43
,01
1).
•M
iam
i-D
ade
Co
un
ty h
as 1
3 in
du
stri
es w
ho
se
earn
ings
are
bel
ow
th
e n
atio
nal
ave
rage
, th
e
low
est
of
wh
ich
is M
anu
fact
uri
ng,
at
73%
.
•M
iam
i-D
ade
Co
un
ty e
mp
loym
ent
reco
vere
d m
uch
mo
re
rap
idly
fro
m t
he
late
200
0’s
fin
anci
al c
risi
s th
an t
he
stat
e,
or
the
US
as a
wh
ole
.
•D
esp
ite
this
rap
id r
eco
very
, em
plo
ymen
t in
th
e co
un
ty
has
had
man
y m
ult
iple
per
iod
s o
f n
egat
ive
gro
wth
th
at
we
re n
ot
exp
erie
nce
d in
th
e co
mp
aris
on
reg
ion
s.
•M
ost
rec
entl
y, e
mp
loym
ent
in M
iam
i-D
ade
slu
mp
ed a
s a
resu
lt o
f H
urr
ican
e Ir
ma,
wh
ich
mad
e la
nd
fall
in la
te
201
7.
-6.0
0%
-4.0
0%
-2.0
0%
0.0
0%
2.0
0%
4.0
0%
6.0
0%
8.0
0%
Emp
loym
en
t G
row
th, P
erc
ent
Ch
ange
, Ye
ar o
ver
Ye
ar
Flo
rid
aM
iam
i-D
ade
Un
ited
Sta
tes
Hea
lth
Car
e an
d S
oci
al
Ass
ista
nce
, 1
61
,64
6
Ret
ail T
rad
e, 1
51
,44
6
Go
vern
men
t, 1
49
,32
9
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
an
d
Foo
d S
ervi
ces,
13
0,0
94
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e an
d
Sup
po
rt a
nd
Was
te
Man
agem
ent
and
R
emed
iati
on
Ser
vice
s,
94
,40
1
Pro
fess
ion
al, S
cien
tifi
c,
and
Tec
hn
ical
Ser
vice
s,
93
,25
9
Tran
spo
rtat
ion
an
d
War
eho
usi
ng,
89
,87
1
Co
nst
ruct
ion
, 78
,71
5
Oth
er S
ervi
ces
(exc
ept
Pu
blic
Ad
min
istr
atio
n),
7
0,4
22
Wh
ole
sale
Tra
de,
69
,00
1
$0
$20,
000
$40,
000
$60,
000
$80,
000
$100
,00
0
$120
,00
0
-10
%0
%1
0%
20
%3
0%
40
%5
0%
60
%7
0%
Average Earnings, 2019
Per
cen
t C
han
ge in
Em
plo
ymen
t, 2
01
2-2
01
9
Top
10
Ind
ust
rie
s b
y Em
plo
yme
nt
(20
12
-20
19
)
Bel
ow
75
% o
f U
S Ea
rnin
gs
Bet
wee
n7
5%
an
d 1
00
%A
bo
ve 1
00
% o
f U
S Ea
rnin
gs
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 14PAGE 3 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
70
Mia
mi-
Dade C
ounty
No
tes:
LQ
’s >
= th
an 1
.25
are
hig
hlig
hte
d. E
arn
ings
ab
ove
th
e re
gio
nal
ave
rage
ear
nin
gs f
or
all i
nd
ust
ries
of
$6
3,1
39
an
d o
ccu
pat
ion
s o
f $
23
.92
per
ho
ur
are
hig
hlig
hte
d.
Rel
ativ
e Ea
rnin
gs a
bo
ve t
he
US
are
in g
reen
, wh
ile e
arn
ings
bel
ow
th
e U
S ar
e re
d.
Dat
a So
urc
e:
12EM
SI –
QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, N
on
-QC
EW E
mp
loye
es, a
nd
Sel
f-Em
plo
yed
;
Ne
t%
722511
Full
-Ser
vice
Res
tau
ran
ts5
1,6
61
63
32
12
%1
.15
$3
2,2
60
.97
$2
5,7
80
1.2
5
622110
Gen
eral
Med
ical
an
d S
urg
ical
Ho
spit
als
46
,62
13
13
37
%1
.21
$8
4,9
05
.22
$8
0,6
68
1.0
5
903999
Loca
l Go
vern
men
t, E
xclu
din
g Ed
uca
tio
n a
nd
Ho
spit
als
45
,25
73
71
1%
0.9
7$
97
,46
0.5
4$
80
,94
11
.20
903611
Elem
enta
ry a
nd
Sec
on
dar
y Sc
ho
ols
(Lo
cal G
ove
rnm
ent)
36
,05
0-6
55
5-1
8%
0.6
1$
65
,20
5.6
9$
70
,29
60
.93
721110
Ho
tels
(exc
ept
Cas
ino
Ho
tels
) an
d M
ote
ls3
1,3
36
38
41
%2
.32
$4
3,5
53
.19
$3
6,4
55
1.1
9
722513
Lim
ited
-Ser
vice
Res
tau
ran
ts2
8,5
82
16
92
6%
0.7
8$
22
,89
6.2
9$
19
,31
61
.19
621111
Off
ices
of P
hys
icia
ns
(exc
ept
Men
tal H
ealt
h S
pec
iali
sts)
25
,21
22
81
61
1%
1.1
8$
91
,77
7.6
0$
11
2,5
99
0.8
2
445110
Sup
erm
arke
ts a
nd
Oth
er G
roce
ry (e
xcep
t C
on
ven
ien
ce) S
tore
s2
4,5
02
32
01
%1
.18
$3
0,5
18
.79
$3
1,7
19
0.9
6
611310
Co
lleg
es, U
niv
ersi
ties
, an
d P
rofe
ssio
nal
Sch
oo
ls2
2,3
90
31
60
14
%1
.37
$6
4,1
86
.31
$5
7,6
11
1.1
1
541110
Off
ices
of L
awye
rs2
1,7
21
82
44
%2
.14
$1
30
,16
5.1
7$
11
8,4
45
1.1
0
NA
ICS
De
scri
pti
on
Fore
cast
Gro
wth
,
20
19
-20
24
20
19
Jo
bs
20
19
To
tal
Earn
ings
20
19
Nat
ion
al
Tota
l
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(US=
1)
20
19
LQ
(US=
1.0
0)
To
p 1
0 I
nd
ust
rie
s b
y E
mp
loy
me
nt
(6-D
igit
s N
AIC
S)1
2
To
p 1
0 O
ccu
pa
tio
ns
by
Em
plo
ym
en
t (5
-Dig
its
SO
C)1
2
Ne
t%
41-2
031
Re
tail
Sal
esp
ers
on
s47
,778
-335
-1%
6,98
31.
29$1
1.41
$11.
650.
98
41-2
011
Cas
hie
rs30
,754
-131
0%5,
827
1.04
$10.
19$1
0.78
0.95
43-4
051
Cu
sto
me
r Se
rvic
e R
ep
rese
nta
tive
s30
,330
-141
0%4,
069
1.27
$15.
31$1
6.22
0.94
43-9
061
Off
ice
Cle
rks,
Ge
ne
ral
28,3
8457
72%
3,58
51.
02$1
4.90
$15.
740.
95
29-1
141
Re
gist
ere
d N
urs
es
28,2
0630
4911
%2,
182
1.14
$33.
22$3
4.46
0.96
53-7
062
Lab
ore
rs a
nd
Fre
igh
t25
,857
1433
6%3,
993
1.05
$12.
35$1
3.58
0.91
35-3
031
Wai
ters
an
d W
aitr
ess
es
24,7
6922
009%
5,40
71.
17$9
.95
$10.
470.
95
35-3
021
Co
mb
ine
d F
oo
d P
rep
arat
ion
an
d S
erv
ing
Wo
rke
rs24
,568
1990
8%4,
939
0.80
$10.
31$1
0.22
1.01
37-2
011
Jan
ito
rs a
nd
Cle
ane
rs23
,549
2160
9%3,
676
1.11
$10.
94$1
2.58
0.87
43-6
014
Secr
eta
rie
s an
d A
dm
inis
trat
ive
Ass
ista
nts
22,8
55-2
59-1
%2,
587
1.08
$16.
67$1
7.59
0.95
SOC
De
scri
pti
on
Fore
cast
Gro
wth
,
2019
-202
4
2019
Nat
ion
al
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Re
lati
ve
Earn
ings
(US=
1)
Pro
ject
ed
An
nu
al
Op
en
ings
2019
Jo
bs
2019
LQ
(US=
1.00
)
2019
Me
dia
n
Ho
url
y
Earn
ings
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 14PAGE 4 OF 4FILED: 06/08/2020
71
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 15 FILED: 06/08/2020
CITATIONS AND SOURCES
72
DOCKET NO. 20200051-GU EXHIBIT NO. (RKH-1) DOCUMENT NO. 15PAGE 1 OF 1FILED: 06/08/2020
CITATIONS AND SOURCES
i Stanley K. Smith, “Florida Population Growth: Past, Present and Future,” University of Florida Bureau of Business and Economic Research (BEBR), June 2005. ii Woods & Poole Economics, 2019, and author’s calculations.iii Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Leading Index for Florida [FLSLIND], retrieved from FRED website, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FLSLIND, February 2020. iv Catherine Hausman and Ryan Kellogg, “Welfare and Distributional Implications of Shale Gas,” National Bureau of Economic Research (“NBER”) Working Paper 21115, April 2015. Also, Knittel, el al., “Natural Gas Prices and Coal Displacement: Evidence from Electricity Markets,” NBER Working Paper 21627, October 2015. v Holland, et al., “Decompositions and Policy Consequences of an Extraordinary Decline in Air Pollution from Electricity Generation,” NBER Working Paper 25339, December 2018. See pages 2 and 8 for descriptions of declines in pollutants and for damages by pollutant and by fuel. vi See, e.g., Knittel, el al., “Natural Gas Prices and Coal Displacement: Evidence from Electricity Markets,” NBER Working Paper 21627, October 2015. Also, Joseph Cullen and Erin Mansur, “Inferring Carbon Abatement Costs in Electricity Markets: A Revealed Preference Approach using the Shale Revolution,” NBER Working Paper 20795, December 2014. vii EIA “Natural gas-fired power generation has grown in Florida, displacing coal,” in Today in Energy, September 9, 2019. viii Woods & Poole Economics, 2019, and author’s calculations.
73