Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

download Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

of 9

Transcript of Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

  • 7/29/2019 Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

    1/9

    J. RADIAT. RES., 43, 237245 (2002)

    Drinking Beer Reduces Radiation-induced Chromosome

    Aberrations in Human Lymphocytes

    MANAMI MONOBE1,2 and KOICHI ANDO2*

    Beer / Radioprotection / Chromosome aberration / X rays / Heavy ions

    We here investigated and reported the effects of beer drinking on radiation-induced chro-

    mosome aberrations in blood lymphocytes. Human blood that was collected either before or

    after drinking a 700 ml beer was in vitro irradiated with 200 kVp X rays or 50 keV/m carbon

    ions. The relation between the radiation dose and the aberration frequencies (fragments and

    dicentrics) was significantly (p < 0.05) lower for lymphocytes collected 3 h after beer drinking

    than those before drinking. Fitting the dose response to a linear quadratic model showed that thealpha term of carbon ions was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased by beer drinking. A decrease

    of dicentric formation was detected as early as 0.5 h after beer drinking, and lasted not shorter

    than 4.5 h. The mitotic index of lymphocytes was higher after beer drinking than before, indi-

    cating that a division delay would not be responsible for the low aberrations induced by beer

    drinking. An in vitro treatment of normal lymphocytes with 0.1 M ethanol, which corresponded

    to a concentration of 6-times higher than the maximum ethanol concentration in the blood after

    beer drinking, reduced the dicentric formation caused by X-ray irradiation, but not by carbon-

    ion irradiation. The beer-induced reduction of dicentric formation was not affected by serum. It

    is concluded that beer could contain non-ethanol elements that reduce the chromosome damage

    of lymphocytes induced by high-LET radiation.

    INTRODUCTION

    The search for effective radioprotectors is a major

    concern in the medical, military, environmental, and

    space sciences. Densely ionizing radiation, such as

    radon - particles and cosmic rays, has a characteris-

    tic of high LET (linear energy transfer), and produces

    lesions through direct action. Sparsely ionizing radia-

    tion (X rays and rays) induces DNA lesions mostly

    by indirect action, in which free radicals play an impo-

    rtant role. Free radicals can be reduced by radical

    scavengers, including alcohols, dimetylsulfoxide

    (DMSO) and superoxide dismutase (SOD)14)

    . Radio-

    protectors that act by scavenging free radicals for the

    most part find it difficult to prevent the occurrence of

    direct damage. Phosphorothioates, including WR-

    2721 and WR-151327, were the most effective class of

    radioprotectors against high-LET radiation5)

    . Conven-

    tional radioprotectors generally display their radiopro-

    tective properties only at high, toxic concentrations.

    Radioprotectors with low toxicity have been searched

    for many years. Some food elements, including vita-

    mins, squalene and garlic extract, have recently been

    reported to possess radioprotective activities against

    damage caused by low-LET radiation68)

    . There is,

    however, no report on food elements that protect mam-

    malian cells from damage caused by high-LET radia-

    *Corresponding author: Phone: +81432063231,

    Fax: +81432064149,

    E-mail: [email protected] Graduate School of Science and Technology, Chiba University, 133,

    Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba 2638522, Japan2 Division of Heavy-ion Radiobiology Research Group, National Institute

    of Radiological Sciences, 91, Anagawa-4-chome, Inage-ku, Chiba 263

    8555, Japan

  • 7/29/2019 Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

    2/9

    M. MONOBE and K. ANDO238

    tion.

    In the present study, we found that beer drinking

    reduced high- and low-LET radiation-induced chro-

    mosome aberrations in lymphocytes irradiated in vitro.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Irradiation

    Whole blood samples were irradiated in air at

    Fig. 1. Dose-response of chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes exposed to either 200 kVp X-radiation or LET 50 KeV/m carbon ion

    either before or 3 h after beer drinking. (a) and (b), X rays; (c) and (d), carbon ions. The values represent means SEM (n=100).

    Data was fitted to a linear-quadratic dose response function. The open circles ( ), before beer drinking; solid square ( ), 3 h after

    beer drinking. The statistic significance was obtained between control and beer drinking (p < 0.05 by analysis of Two-way factorial

    ANOVA test; Statview, Macintosh).

  • 7/29/2019 Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

    3/9

    BEER AND CHROMOSOME ABERRATION

    239

    room temperature with either X rays (200 kVp; 20

    mA; 0.5 mm Cu + 0.5 mm Al filters; focus center dis-

    tance, 55 cm) at a dose rate of 1 Gy/min or carbon-12

    ion beams. Carbon ions were accelerated up to 290

    MeV/u by HIMAC synchrotron at the National Insti-

    tute of Radiological Science (NIRS, Chiba, Japan).

    Lucite absorbers with 141 mm thickness were used to

    select a LET of 50 keV/

    m, which is a dose-averaged

    value including the contribution of fragments. X-ray

    irradiations were performed within 30 min after blood

    collection, while carbon-ion irradiations were made 4

    h after blood collection with a variable dose rate of

    between 1 and 5 Gy/min.

    Blood sampling

    A healthy, non-smoking 28-year-old female vol-

    unteer drank a 700 ml beer (ethanol content; 40 mg/

    ml) within 15 min. Blood was collected in heparinized

    tubes (Becton Dickinson Co., NJ, USA) either before

    beer drinking or 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 4.5 h afterwards.

    The ethanol concentration in plasma was measured by

    gas chromatography at the KOTO microorganism lab-

    oratory (Tokyo, Japan).

    Isolation of lymphocytes and plasma

    Lymphocytes were isolated using LeucoPREP

    tubes (Becton Dickinson Co., NJ, USA). Each tube

    was centrifuged for 30 min at 3000 rpm, and a white

    layer containing mononuclear cells was collected by a

    pipette and transferred to a conical centrifuge tube

    (Becton Dickinson Co., NJ, USA). Phosphate-buff-

    ered saline (PBS) was added up to 14 ml, and the tube

    was centrifuged for 5 min at 1500 rpm. The resulting

    pellet was washed 5 once again in PBS and resuspend-

    ed in either the RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco-BRL,

    N.Y., USA) or the plasma 3 h after beer drinking. In

    order to avoid dilution by the separation liquid con-

    tained in LeucoPREP, the blood plasma was isolated

    Table 1.

    Parameters of dose-response for the induction of dicentrics and acentric fragments.

    X rays

    Dicentric Acentric fragment

    (

    10

    2

    )

    SD(Gy

    1

    )

    (

    10

    2) SD(Gy2) (102) SD(Gy1) (102) SD(Gy2)

    Non-treatment 14.21.8 7.10.4 15.9 4.1 14.90.8

    beer drinking 8.11.0* 5.70.2 11.74.8 14.91.1

    0.1 M ethanol 14.04.5 2.60.9 11.68.4 9.01.7

    0.01 M ethanol 24.13.0 2.40.6 23.67.1 10.41.4

    carbon ions

    Dicentric Acentric fragment

    (102) SD(Gy1) (102) SD(Gy2) (102) SD(Gy1) (102) SD(Gy2)

    Non-treatment 46.60.9 104.43.6

    beer drinking 28.70.7* 67.41.7

    0.1 M ethanol 39.40.9 104.62.1

    0.01 M ethanol 38.60.7 102.53.6

    Parameters and were derived from maximum-likelihood fits of data to linear quadratic dose response functions;

    Y = D + D2

    For carbon ions is not significantly different from zero. Thus, the coefficient for carbon ions was set to zero.

    *: p < 0.05

  • 7/29/2019 Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

    4/9

    M. MONOBE and K. ANDO240

    using heparinized tubes. Each tube was centrifuged for

    5 min at 3000 rpm, and the contents were transferred

    to a conical tube (Becton Dickinson Co., NJ, USA).

    In vitro ethanol experiments

    Ninety-nine (99%) ethanol was added to whole

    blood samples in vitro, providing a final concentration

    of 10 mM, which roughly corresponded to the blood

    ethanol concentration 3 h after beer drinking. Blood

    samples with a high concentration of 100 mM ethanol

    were also prepared. The samples were kept at room

    temperature for 1 h before irradiation.

    Blood cultures and chromosome analysis

    Either 1.0 ml of irradiated whole blood or lym-

    phocytes was suspended in 9 ml of a RPMI 1640

    medium (Gibco-BRL, N.Y., USA) supplemented with

    20% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, 0.06 mg/ml kanamycin

    (antibiotics) (Meiji Seika, Tokyo, Japan), 1.25 mg/ml

    sodium bicarbonate, 90 g/ml PHA-M (Murex Bio-

    tech Ltd., UK), and 0.05 g/ml colcemid (Wako pure

    Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan). Cells were

    plated in T-25 flasks and incubated at 37C in a

    humidified atmosphere containing 95% air plus 5%

    CO2. Colcemid was added to the medium at the begin-

    ning of the culture in order to obtain a sufficient num-

    ber of cells at the metaphase in the first cell division9)

    .

    After 53 h of incubation, cultured cells were treated

    with a hypotonic solution (75 mM KCl) for 20 min at

    37C and fixed with methanol-acetic acid (3:1). Chro-

    mosome slides were made by the conventional method

    of air-drying under a warm and humid condition.

    Chromosome slides were stained by Giemsa in phos-

    phate buffered saline (pH 6.8), embedded in Eukitt (O.

    Kindler, Germany), and finally observed under a light

    microscope. with the highest magnification ( 1000).

    Fig. 2. Time course of the chromosome aberration frequency in lymphocytes and plasma ethanol concentrations after beer drinking. Lym-

    phocytes were exposed in vitro to 4 Gy of X rays (a) or carbon ions (b). The values of the chromosome aberration frequency repre-

    sent means SEM (n=100). The statistic significance (*; p < 0.05, t-test) was obtained between control and beer drinking.

    Fig. 3. Mitotic index of lymphocytes after 53 h culture. Lympho-

    cytes were collected either before beer drinking ( ) or 3

    h after beer drinking ( ), and were irradiated with 4 Gy

    of either X rays (left) or carbon ions (right). The mitotic

    index was determined as the percentage of dividing cells

    among 10000 cells. The statistic significance (*; p < 0.01,

    t-test) was obtained between before drinking and beer

    drinking.

  • 7/29/2019 Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

    5/9

    BEER AND CHROMOSOME ABERRATION

    241

    One hundred metaphase figures were examined to

    detect unstable types of chromosome aberrations, such

    as dicentrics and acentric fragments, while 1000 cells

    were examined for non-radiation control. The experi-

    ments were repeated twice, and all of the data were

    combined for analysis.

    Fig. 4.

    Effects of ethanol on radiation-induced chromosome aberrations of lymphocytes. Ethanol of either 0.01 M ( ) or 0.1 M ( ) was

    added to the collected blood in vitro 1 h before irradiation with X rays (a; dicentric, b; fragment) or carbon ions (c; dicentric, d;

    fragment). Closed circles ( ), before beer drinking. Data (n =100, mean SEM) were fit to a linear-quadratic dose response func-

    tion.

  • 7/29/2019 Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

    6/9

    M. MONOBE and K. ANDO242

    Curve fit and statistical analysis

    Dose-response data were fit to the following lin-

    ear-quadratic regression: Y =

    D +

    D

    2

    , where Y is

    the yield of induced chromosome aberrations per cell,

    D is the dose in Gy, and and are fit coefficients.

    No fragments or dicentrics were detectable for the

    non-radiation control. The data were analyzed by

    using a two-way factorial ANOVA test (Statview, SAS

    Institute Inc.).

    RESULTS

    Figure 1 shows the dose-response curve of either

    X rays or carbon ions before and 3 h after beer drink-

    ing. The chromosome aberrations induced by radiation

    were significantly lower (p < 0.05 by analysis of the

    two-way factorial ANOVA test; Statview, Macintosh)

    for lymphocytes collected from a donor 3 h after beer

    drinking than those without beer drinking. The alpha

    () components of both X rays and carbon ions were

    decreased (p < 0.05) after beer drinking (Table 1).

    The number of dicentrics per cell induced by 4

    Gy X rays was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased from

    1.75, a pre-beer drinking value, to 1.24 when lympho-

    cytes were collected as early as 30 min after beer

    drinking, and continued to be low up to 4.5 h after beer

    drinking (Fig. 2a). The number of dicentrics per cell

    induced by 4 Gy of carbon ions was also significantly

    (p < 0.05) decreased from 1.85 to 1.38 when lympho-

    cytes were collected 30 min after beer drinking (Fig.

    2b). During the period of 30 min through 4.5 h after

    beer drinking, the ethanol concentration in plasma

    changed ~ 8 times, and ranged from 2 to 16 mM (Fig.

    2 a, b).

    Figure 3 shows a mitotic index of lymphocytes

    that received 4 Gy of either X rays or carbon ions 3 h

    after beer drinking. The mitotic index was significant-

    ly (p < 0.01) higher for the post-beer drinking condi-

    tion than the pre-beer drinking condition. The ratio of

    post- to pre-beer drinking groups was 1.65 (3.07 /

    1.86) for X rays, and 2.05 (2.48 / 1.21) for carbon

    ions.

    The addition of ethanol to the blood samples

    before X rays significantly reduced the chromosome

    aberrations (p < 0.05 by analysis of the two-way fac-

    torial ANOVA test; Statview, Macintosh) (Fig. 4 a, b).

    The addition of 10 mM ethanol to the blood samples

    before 4 Gy of X-radiation reduced chromosome aber-

    rations; the number of dicentrics per cell decreased

    from 1.75 to 1.30, and the number of acentric frag-

    ments per cell decreased from 2.91 to 2.34, respective-

    ly. These numbers were similar to the values obtained

    for lymphocytes collected 3 h after beer drinking (Fig.

    Fig. 5. Effects of plasma on dicentric formation. Lymphocytes in peripheral blood that were collected either before ( ) or 3 h after ( )

    beer drinking were separated from plasma, and were then suspend either in serum that was collected 3 h after beer drinking or in a

    RPMI medium. Lymphocytes were exposed in vitro to 4 Gy of X rays (a) or carbon ions (b). The values represent means

    SEM

    (n=100).

  • 7/29/2019 Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

    7/9

    BEER AND CHROMOSOME ABERRATION

    243

    1a, b). Ethanol also showed reduced carbon-induced

    dicentrics (p < 0.05 by analysis of Two-way factorial

    ANOVA test; Statview, Macintosh). However, an

    increase of the ethanol concentration from 10 to 100

    mM did not increase the reduction of dicentrics (Fig.

    4c). Ethanol failed to reduce any acentric fragments

    induced by carbon-ion radiation (Fig. 4d).

    A possibility that plasma could contain aberra-

    tion-reducing substances was examined by separating

    the lymphocytes from the plasma. As shown in Fig. 5,

    replacing the plasma with RPMI 1640 medium did not

    affect the yields of chromosome aberrations. Less

    dicentrics were detected for the post-beer drinking

    lymphocytes than for the pre-beer drinking lympho-

    cytes

    DISCUSSION

    In the present study, we showed that beer drink-

    ing reduced the chromosome aberration in lympho-

    cytes that were in vitro irradiated with X rays or 50

    keV/

    m carbon ions.

    Beer drinking decreased the alpha component

    rather than the beta component of X rays as well as of

    carbon ions (Table 1). The alpha component is a coef-

    ficient that suggests the single track-2 hits event in

    DNA

    10)

    . Slow electrons of 700 eV would produce

    densely ionizing events over a dimension of ~ 10 nm,

    which could be responsible for mammalian cell killing

    by the single-hit mechanisms of X rays and charged

    particles as well. A scavenger of the hydroxyl (OH)

    radical, DMSO, protects mammalian cell kill by

    reducing the alpha component of not only X rays, but

    also of high-LET charged particles

    11)

    . The mechanismby which high-concentration DMSO suppresses high-

    LET radiation-induced cell killing is not yet under-

    stood.

    Some food elements, including vitamins, squ-

    alene and garlic extract, have recently been reported to

    possess radioprotective activities against damage

    caused by low-LET radiation68)

    . The protective effect

    observed in vitamins has been explained by the scav-

    enging of oxidizing free-radicals. The mechanism of

    radioprotection is, however, not clear. Ghiselli et al.12)

    report that beer increases the plasma antioxidant

    capacity in humans, and that ethanol alone dose not

    affect the plasma antioxidant capacity. Beer is effec-

    tive to inhibit salmonella mutations caused by hetero-

    cyclic amines (HAs), 2- chloro-4-methylthiobutanoic

    acid (CMBA) and N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguani-

    dine (MNNG)1315)

    ; this inhibition is not due to alco-

    hol. However, there is no report that beer decreases

    chromosome aberration.

    Ethanol protects DNA from X rays inducing

    strand breaks by OH radical scavenging1)

    . In the

    present study, the in vitro addition of 10 mM ethanol

    that corresponded to a plasma concentration of ethanol

    23 h after beer drinking, reduced the X-ray-induced

    chromosome aberrations (Fig. 1a, b; Fig. 4a, b). The

    OH radical scavenging by ethanol could be responsi-

    ble for the X-ray induced-aberration reduction by beer

    drinking. However, the plasma ethanol concentration

    at 4.5 h after beer drinking is around 2 mM, which is

    8-times lower than the highest concentration at 0.5 h,

    and much lower than the ethanol in vitro used (Fig. 2).

    Also, ethanol showed little efficacy to protect carbon-

    induced chromosome aberrations. An increase in the

    ethanol concentration from 10 to 100 mM was not

    effective to further reduce dicentrics (Fig. 4c). It is,

    therefore, unlikely that the beer-induced aberration

    reduction is solely due to ethanol. Figure 5 shows the

    possibility of an intracellular change. Schlorff et al.

    (1999)16)

    report that manganese-superoxide dismutase

    (Mn-SOD) activity significantly increases in a dose-

    dependent manner. SODs play a key role in preventing

    the DNA damage caused by reactive free radicals. Jok-

    sic et al (2000)17) report that Mn-SOD plays an impor-

    tant role in decreasing chromosome aberrationinduced by radiaton in lymphocytes. The intracellular

    changes induced by beer drinking may, in part, be due

    to increased SODs activity in lymphocytes.

    The densely-ionizing radiation induces severe

    cell-cycle delay1820)

    , which can modify the shape of

    the dose-response curve at M-phase analysis21)

    . The

    cell-cycle delay may not, however, contribute to the

    aberration reduction by beer drinking, because the

    mitotic indices rather increased upon beer drinking

  • 7/29/2019 Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

    8/9

    M. MONOBE and K. ANDO244

    (Fig. 3). Because our cell-culture method allows only

    few (1.6%) lymphocytes to progress to the second

    mitosis9)

    , it is not likely that the escape of cells from

    the colcemid block could largely contribute to the

    aberration reduction by beer drinking.

    The radiation-induced chromosome aberrations

    could be influenced by a hormonal condition in wom-

    en. The female estradiol concentration in serum varies

    depending on the sexual cycle. Kanda et al.22) have

    reported that estradiol in blood decreases mitosis and

    increases chromosome aberration in lymphocytes.

    Because the present studies were performed at a ran-

    dom period in the sexual cycle of a volunteer, the sex-

    ual cycle may not, if any, significantly contribute to

    the present results.

    Dicentrics and translocations of lymphocytes

    are most often used to estimate the radiation doses

    received by astronauts, people involved in radiation

    accidents and during radiation therapy2327)

    . Dicen-

    trics are well associated with long-term effects caused

    by radiation. Similar yields of dicentrics and translo-

    cations are induced by ionizing radiation2830)

    . Beer

    drinking may affect the biological dose estimation

    using human lymphocytes.

    Further studies are required to elucidate the

    mechanisms of chromosome aberration reduction

    induced by beer drinking.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-

    Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports

    and Culture of Japan and by the Special Coordination

    Funds for Research Project with Heavy Ions at theNational Institute of Radiological Sciences Heavy

    ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba (NIRS-HIMAC). We

    would like to thank Drs. K. Fujitaka, H. Yamaguchi,

    S. Kakinuma, Y. Shimada, K. Nojima and S. Koike for

    their helpful comments.

    REFERENCES

    1. Roots, R. and Okada, S. (1972) Protection of DNA mol-

    ecules of cultured mammalian cells from radiation-

    induced single-strand scissions by various alcohols and

    SH compounds. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys.

    Chem. Med. 21: 329342.

    2. Chapman, J. D., Dugle, D. L., Reuvers, A. P., Gillespie,

    C. J. and Borsa, J. (1975) Chemical radiosensitizationstudies with mammalian cells growing in vitro. In: Radi-

    ation Research, Biomedical, Chemical, and Physical Per-

    spectives. pp. 752760, Academic Press, New York.

    3. Littlefield, L. G., Joiner, E. E., Colyer, S. P., Sayer, A. M.

    and Frome, E. L. (1988) Modulation of radiation-induced

    chromosome aberrations by DMSO, an OH radical scav-

    enger. 1: Dose-response studies in human lymphocytes

    exposed to 220 kV X-rays. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat.

    Stud. Phys. Chem. Med. 53: 875890.

    4. Petkau, A. (1978) Radiation protection by superoxide dis-

    mutase. Photochem Photobiol. 28: 765774.

    5. Sigdestad, C. P., Connor, A. M., Scott, R. M. (1975)Chemical radiation protection of the intestinal epithelium

    by mercaptoethylamine and its thiophosphate derivative.

    Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1: 5360.

    6. Konopacka, M. and Rzeszowska-Wolny, J. (2001) Anti-

    oxidant vitamins C, E and beta-carotene reduce DNA

    damage before as well as after gamma-ray irradiation of

    human lymphocytes in vitro. Mutat. Res. 491: 17.

    7. Storm, H. M., Oh, S. Y., Kimler, B. F. and Norton, S.

    (1995) Radioprotection of mice by dietary squalene. Lip-

    ids. 28: 555559.

    8. Singh, S. P., Abraham, S. K. and Kesavan, P. C. (1995)

    In vivo radioprotection with garlic extract. Mutat. Res.

    345: 147153.

    9. Kanda, R., Jiang, T., Hayata, I. and Kobayashi, S. (1994)

    Effects of colcemid concentration on chromosome aber-

    ration analysis in human lymphocytes. J. Radiat. Res. 35:

    4147.

    10. Hall, E. J. (2000) DNA strand breaks and chromosomal

    aberrations. In: Radiobiology for the radiologist, 5th ed.,

    pp. 1730, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.

    11. Chapman, J. D. (1980) Biophysical models of mammalian

    cell inactivation by radiation. In: Radiation Biology in

    Cancer Research, Eds. Raymond E. Meyn and H. RodneyWithers. pp. 2132, Raven Press, New York.

    12. Ghiselli, A., Natella, F., Guidi, A., Montanari, L., Fan-

    tozzi, P. and Scaccini, C., (2000) Beer increases plasma

    antioxidant capacity in humans. Journal of Nutritional

    Biochemistry. 11: 7680.

    13. Arimoto-Kobayashi, S., Sugiyama, C., Harada, N.,

    Takeuchi, M., Takemura, M. and Hayatsu, H. (1999)

    Inhibitory effects of beer and other alcoholic beverages on

    mutagenesis and DNA adduct formation induced by sev-

    eral carcinogens. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 47: 221230.

  • 7/29/2019 Beer and Less Chromosome Aberration-Monobe and Ando (2002)

    9/9

    BEER AND CHROMOSOME ABERRATION 245

    14. Kimura, S., Hayatsu, H., Arimoto-Kobayashi, S. (1999)

    Glycine betaine in beer as an antimutagenic substance

    against 2-chloro-4-methylthiobutanoic acid, the sanma-

    fish mutagen. Mutat. Res. 439: 267276.

    15. Yoshikawa, T., Kimura, S., Hatano, T., Okamoto, K.,

    Hayatsu, H., Arimoto- Kobayashi, S. (2002) Pseudouri-dine, an antimutagenic substance in beer towards N-

    methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). Food Chem.

    Toxicol. 40: 11651170.

    16. Schlorff, E. C., Husain, K., Somani, S. M. (1999) Dose

    and time dependent effects of ethanol on antioxidant sys-

    tem in rat testes. Alcohol. 18: 203214.

    17. Joksic, G., Pajovic, S. B., Stankovic, M., Pejic, S., Kasa-

    povic, J., Cuttone, G., Calonghi, N., Masotti, L., Kanazir,

    D. T. (2000) Chromosome aberrations, micronuclei, and

    activity of superoxide dismutases in human lymphocytes

    after irradiation in vitro. Cell. Mol. Life. Sci. 57: 842

    850.18. Scholz, M., Kraft-Weyrather, W., Ritter, S. and Kraft, G.

    (1994) Cell cycle delays induced by heavy ion irradiation

    of synchronous mammalian cells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 66:

    5975.

    19. Ritter, S., Nasonova, E., Scholz, M., Kraft-Weyrather, W.

    and Kraft, G. (1996) Comparison of chromosomal dam-

    age induced by X-rays and Ar ions with an LET of 1840

    keV/micrometer in G1 V79 cells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 69:

    155166.

    20. Geard, C. R. (1980) Initial changes in cell cycle progres-

    sion of Chinese hamster V- 79 cells induced by high-LET

    charged particles. Radiat. Res. 83: 696709.

    21. Durante, M., Furusawa, Y., Majima, H., Kawata, T. and

    Gotoh, E. (1999) Association between G2-phase block

    and repair of radiation-induced chromosome fragments in

    human lymphocytes. Radiat. Res. 151: 670676.

    22. Kanda, R. and Hayata, I. (1999), Effect of estradiol on

    radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in human lym-

    phocytes. J. Radiat. Res. 40: 95100.

    23. Obe, G., Johannes, I., Johannes, C., Hallman, K., Reitz,

    G. and Facius, R. (1997) Chromosomal aberrations in

    blood lymphocytes of astronauts after long- term space

    flights. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 72: 727734.

    24. Kamada, N. (1999) Biological dosimetry of atomic bomb

    survivors exposed within 500 meters from the hypocenter

    and the health consequences. J. Radiat. Res. 40: 15564.25. Engels, H., Menzel, H. G., Pihet, P. and Wambersie, A.

    (1999) Risk assessment for cancer induction after low-

    and high-LET therapeutic irradiation. Strahlenther.

    Onkol. 175: 4751.

    26. Hayata, I., Kanda, R., Minamihisamatsu, M., Furukawa,

    M., Sasaki, M. S. (2001) Cytogenetical dose estimation

    for 3 severely exposed patients in the JCO criticality acci-

    dent in Tokai-mura. J. Radiat. Res. 42: S149155.

    27. Sasaki, M. S., Hayata, I., Kamada, N., Kodama, Y.,

    Kodama, S. (2001) Chromosome aberration analysis in

    persons exposed to low-level radiation from the JCO crit-

    icality accident in Tokai-mura. J. Radiat. Res. 42: S107116.

    28. Straume, T. and Lucas, J. N. (1993) A comparison of the

    yields of translocations and dicentrics measured using

    fluorescence in situ hybridization. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.

    64:185187.

    29. Kanda, R. and Hayata, I. (1996), Comparison of the yields

    of translocations and dicentrics measured using conven-

    tional Giemsa staining and chromosome painting. J.

    Radiat. Res. 40: 701705.

    30. Lucas, J. N., Hill, F. S., Burk, C. E., Cox, A. B. and

    Straume, T. (1996) Stability of the translocation fre-

    quency following whole-body irradiation measured in

    rhesus monkeys. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 70: 309318.

    Solicited at the 44 th. JRRS Annual Meeting (OSAKA)

    Received on October 6, 2001

    1st. Revision on April 22, 2002

    2nd. Revision on May 10, 2002

    Accepted on May 27, 2002