Bee on a gum flo on honey bee Outline - Puget Sound …...Nosema apis affected food glands and blood...
Transcript of Bee on a gum flo on honey bee Outline - Puget Sound …...Nosema apis affected food glands and blood...
1
1
Effect of Nosema on honey bee Physiology and behavior
Zachary HuangMichigan State University
Bee on a gum floNBG, ACTMarch 24, 2009
2
Outline• What is Nosema apis
Biology of the pathogen• Honey bee division of labor
Biology of the honey bee• The Nosema-JH connection
Extended phenotype?• The test of hypothesis
• Effect of Nosema ceranae on bees
3
The Nosema parasite
• Nosema apis Zander 1909• A spore forming microsporadian• Classification:
Protista (now a fungus!): Microsporidia: Microsporea: Microsporida
• Obligatory parasite of epithelial cells of midgut of honey bee adults (all castes)
• A new species (N. ceranae) was described in 1996, initially found in Apis cerana.
4
Life cycle of Nosema
• Transmitted by spores• Spore ingested by bees• Long, coiled, polar filament everts• Sporoplasm injected into host cell• Multiply through vegetative stages• Spores released when host cells burst• Spores voided and re-infect other bees or
re-infect other midgut cells
Photo: http://www.biol.lu.se/cellorgbiol/microsporidia/proj_descr.html
2
5
Life Cycle
http://www.ojhas.org/issue19/micro2.gif
6
Dysentery
7
DeadColonies
8
Nosema spores (x400)
3
9
Effect of Nosema on workers
Protein deficiency due to indigestionlower protein, lipid and sugar levels in blood
• Earlier regression of food glands: poor nursing• Earlier onset of foraging and guarding• Shorter life span (22-44% reduction)
Wang & Moeller, 1970; 1971
10
Regression of hypopharyngeal gland
Healthy nurse Infected nurse
11
Worker bees: behavioral developmentand changes with juvenile hormone
Days since emergence2 - 10 11 - 20 21 - 35
Low JH titer High JH titer
12
JH affects onset of worker foraging and hypopharyngeal gland development
JH treatment induces • Earlier regression of hypopharyngeal glands • Earlier onset of foraging and guarding• Shortening of life (due to limited foraging life)
Jaycox, 1976, Jaycox et al 1974, Robinson 1987, Sasagawa, 1989
4
13
Effect of Nosema on workers
Protein deficiency due to indigestionlower protein, lipid and sugar levels in blood
• Earlier regression of food glands: poor nursing• Earlier onset of foraging and guarding• Shorter life span (22-44% reduction)
Wang & Moeller, 1970, 1971.
14
Effect of JH on workers
Protein deficiency due to indigestionlower protein, lipid and sugar levels in blood
• Earlier regression of food glands: poor nursing• Earlier onset of foraging and guarding• Shorter life span
Jaycox 1976, Jaycox et al. 1974, Robinson 1986.
15
Nosema JH Foraging?
16
R. Dawkins (1982): “The Extended Phenotype.”
All phenotype is a means for replicating genes.
Host manipulation by a parasite(to increase the fitness of the parasite):
* Caterpillars climb high on grass when dying from virus* Slugs change color when parasitized * Honey bees forage early when infected by Nosema
-- cites a Science paper suggesting Nosema produces JH-- infected hemipterans have supernumerary instars-- allatectomized animals with Nosema show JH activity
5
17
Incubation
Quantification
Extraction
Radioimmunoassay for JH titers
Developed by Hunnicutt et al. (1989)
Validated for honey bees by Huang et al. (1994)
Allows JH measurement on individual bees
Results of this RIA agree with two other RIAs (Strambi, Goodman), both of which validated with GC / MS (Goodman et al. 1993).
Separation
Bleeding
18
Dissection
Incubation
Quantification
Extraction
Radiochemical Assay for JH biosynthesis
Developed by Pratt & T obe (1974), Tobe and Pratt (1974)
Validated for honey bees by Huang et al. (1991)
Allows JH level measurement on individual bees
Rates are significantly correlated with JH titers as measured by Strambi's RIA (Huang et al., 1991)
19
Nosema changes honey bee behavior
but how?
We asked:
1. Do nosema infected workers have higher JH titers?2. Do they have higher rates of JH production?3. Do they have lower rates of JH degradation?4. Does nosema produce JH directly?
20
Materials and Methods
• Newly emerged workers obtained in incubator• Bees paint-marked or individually tagged• Bees individually fed with Nosema spores• Bees isolated for 30 min, introduced into colony • Foraging observation of marked/tagged bees
6
21
Obtaining Newly Emerged Bees
22
Tagging bees
23
Inoculation
24
Inoculation
7
25
Observation
26
Sampling Bees
27
Armed with bees that respond to Nosema infection,now we can ask the 1st question:
1. Are the earlier foraging in these bees mediated through JH (but not a nosema specific foraging-inducer)
if so, we expect higher JH titers in bees just before they embark on foraging (we did not know if foraging performance itself would elevate JH titers).
28
Collecting Hemolymph
8
29
JH titers are significantly higher in Nosema infected bees, even before foraging started (age=12 days)
JH T
iters
(ng/
ml)
Colony 20 Colony 8
Control Nosema-fed
50
100
150
t = 2.37P<0.01
t = 2.07P<0.02
30
Are the higher JH titers due to higher JH production by infected bees?
Corpora allata (CA)
JH biosynthesis:
remove CA, incubate in vitro with radioactive precursorand measure JH production
31
Rates of JH biosynthesis are also higher in young, Nosema infected bees
JH B
iosy
nthe
sis
( pm
ol/h
/CA
) ControlNosema Fed
Colony number
2
4
6
8
3 18 45
9 109 109 9 910
30
P<0.01 in each colony
32
Allatectomized bees
Do bees with corpora allata removed (allatectomized) still forage early?
Nosema
Control
Foragingobservation
Colony
9
33
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 18 45
Allatectomzied controlAllatectomized bees infected with Nosema
The majority of infected bees did not forage earlierafter CA removal
Colony number
37
G=4.6
*G=1.2
nsG=1.1
ns
5039 3264 30
34
Evidence that Nosema does not produce JH directly:
1. Allatectomized bees showed no behavioral changes
2. Allatectomized bees contained no JH in their blood
3. No radioactive JH was produced when midgut was incubated with radio-labelled methionine.
35
Conclusion:
Nosema does not produce JH directly.
Nosema-infected workers forage earlier: due to higher JH titers, higher rates of JH biosynthesis, and despite of higher rates of degradation.
Is this host manipulation? Probably not:1. There is genetic variation (some bees do not respond)2. Rates of degradation also high (no redundancy)
Alternative explanations?3. Possibly simply higher metabolism due to “stress?”4. “Malnutritioned” bees forage earlier because they are
not good nurses?
36
Hem
olym
ph p
rote
in c
once
ntra
tion
(µg
/µl)
Nosema-infectedControl bees
5
10
15
20
282420161284
5
10
15
20
25
5
10
15
20
25
Colony 28
Colony 26
Colony 27
Age of workers (days)
25
50
75
100
125
25
50
75
100
125
150
282420161284
25
50
75
100
125
Colony 27D
iam
eter
of h
ypop
hary
ngea
l gla
nd a
cinu
s (µ
m)
Colony 28
Nosema-infectedControl bees
Colony 26
Age of workers (days)
Nosema apis affected food glands and blood protein
10
37
New twist on Nosema
1. The original species was Nosema apis.2. A new species was discovered in 1996
by Ingma Fries, in Apis cerana, named Nosema ceranae.
3. In 2005 it was reported in our species (Apis mellifera) in Taiwan and Europe.
4. Now it seems all the nosema we can found in US is also Nosema ceranae.
5. Recent studies in Spain attribute 50% of colony loss to N. ceranae.
38Nosema apis
39
No nutrition x Nosema ceranae interaction, but pollen shows a huge impact on worker longevity.
No pollen -> pollen provided
No nosema
Num
ber o
f sur
vigi
ng b
ees
11
41
# Treatment
1 0 spores, control group
2 30,000 N. ceranae spores
3 30,000 N. apis spores
4 25k N. c + 5k N.a spores
5 20k N. c + 10k N.a spores
6 15k N. c + 15k N.a spores
7 10k N. c + 20k N.a spores
8 5k N. c + 25k N.a spores
Co-infected bees die much earlier than single-species-infected-bees
42
Co-infected bees died earlier in nucs
0102030405060708090
100
Surv
ial r
ates
(%)
Control (50% SugarSolution)
N. apis (50,000spores)
N. ceranae (50,000spores)
Mixed (25,000 Apis +25,000 Ceranae)
43
Co-infected bees foraged faster than others
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Control (50% SugarSolution)
N. apis (50,000 spores)
N. ceranae (50,000spores)
Mixed (25,000 Apis +25,000 Ceranae)
Cum
ulat
ive
% fo
rage
rs
44
Method of infection makes a difference
12
45
Funding Provided by:USDA (NRI)
Ron Lin
Laurent Clauda Jayne Michalek
Rebecca Michalek
Joerg Schmidt-Bailey
46
Thank you for your attention.
Bees on Protea, Mt Tomah BG, April 7, 2009 www.beetography.com