4 th CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), May 26-28, 2009 CLIC two-beam module integration issues
Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector
description
Transcript of Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector
![Page 1: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector
Shahin Sanaye Hajari
1. Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran
2. CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
![Page 2: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Results of the Longitudinal Dynamics
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.1 Envelop Equation
3.2 Emittance Growth
3.3 Simulations
![Page 3: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1. Introduction 1
1. Introduction1.1 Injector Layout
![Page 4: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2. Review of The Longitudinal Results 2
2. Review of The Longitudinal ResultsParameter Value Target valueRMS bunch length () 2.6 mm 3 mmRMS energy spread () 0.48 MeV < 0.5 MeVSatellite population 2.4 % < 5%Beam loss (chicane + satellite) 6.1 % As less as possible
![Page 5: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 3
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.1 Envelop Equation
πβ² β²+π02πβ πΎπ β
ππ‘2
π3 =0
Focusing term
Space charge term
Emittance term
π=2π₯πππ
{ πβ² β² (0 )=πβ² (0 )=0
π02πβ πΎπ β
ππ‘2
π3 =0 Matched Beam
βπ΅=2πΎππ½π
π β 2ππΌ4π π0ππ3 π½3πΎ 3π2 +
ππ‘2
π4
![Page 6: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 4
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.2 Emittance Growth
πβ² β²+π02πβ πΎπ β
ππ‘2
π3 =0
ππππ =π₯πππ π₯πππ β² =π
2
~π£π₯
π½ππβ₯=πΎπ~π£π₯
2
Sources of the emittance growth Non-stationary initial distribution Beam mismatching
![Page 7: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 5
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.2.1 Non-Stationary Initial Distributions
π (π )=π(0)πβπ½2π2π0
2π 2
2~π£π₯2 β
ππ π
ππΎ3 ~π£π₯2
1ππππ (π πππ
ππ )=β ππ0π (π )
Reiserβs formula:
Radial profile
![Page 8: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 6
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.2.2 Beam Mismatching
Wanglerβs formula:
![Page 9: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 7
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.3 Simulations3.3.1 Beam Initial Conditions
π₯πππ =2ππππ=10ππβππππ PARMELA
![Page 10: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 8
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.3 Simulations3.3.2 Matched Beam
Magnetic field map
![Page 11: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 9
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.3 Simulations3.3.2 Matched Beam
RMS Beam Size RMS Normalised Emittance
![Page 12: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 10
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.3 Simulations3.3.2 Bunching Effect
πΌππ£=πΌ 0(πΏππ£ )0πΏππ£
Average bunch length
![Page 13: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 11
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.3 Simulations3.3.2 Bunching Effect
πΌππ£=πΌ 0(πΏππ£ )0πΏππ£
Average bunch current
![Page 14: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 12
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.3 Simulations3.3.2 Bunching Effect
Magnetic field map
Average current profile
![Page 15: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 13
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.3 Simulations3.3.2 Bunching Effect
RMS Beam Size RMS Normalised Emittance
Wanglerβs formula:
![Page 16: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 14
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.3 Simulations3.3.2 Bunching Effect
Target beam size (mm) 2.0 2.5 3.0
21.5 24.1 33.3
Maximum magnetic field (G) 529 409 336
The larger the focusing field the smaller the beam size and the lower the emittance growth
![Page 17: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 15
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.3 Simulations3.3.3 Sensitivity to The Ideal Filed
![Page 18: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
3. Transverse beam dynamics studies 16
3. Transverse Beam Dynamics Studies3.3 Simulations3.3.3 Sensitivity to The Ideal Filed
RMS Beam Size RMS Normalised Emittance
πΎπ½π πππ (mmβmrad ) :24.1βΆ24.8
![Page 19: Beam Dynamics Studies of CLIC DB Injector](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568160c1550346895dcfea41/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Thanks for your attention