Beam Column Base Plate Design
Transcript of Beam Column Base Plate Design
Beam-Column Base Plate Design—LRFD Method
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / FIRST QUARTER / 1999
Richard M. Drake is Principal Structural Engineer, FluorDaniel, Irvine, CA.
Sharon J. Elkin is Structural Engineer, Fluor Daniel, Irvine,CA.
29
1
2
3
4
4
INTRODUCTION
RICHARD M. DRAKE and SHARON J. ELKIN
�
����
�
�
�
�
�
� �
�
IB
Nbdf
m
N . dm
nMP V
B . bn
x
tdx f
t
Fig. 1. Base Plate Design Variables
�
�
�
o o o oo oo o o
oo o oo o oo o o o
oo o o oo oo
o o o oo o oo o oo o o
oo o o o oo o oo o o o o
o oo
oo
o o oo o o oo o o
o o oo
o oo o
o
o o o o o o oo o o
o o oo oo o
o oo
o oo o o o
o oo o o o
o o o oo o o
o o o oo o
o o o o
where:
t is c mm n design practice t design a building r struc-base plate width perpendicular t m ment direc-ture beam-c lumn with a m ment-resisting r fixed base.ti n, in.Theref re the base plate and anch r r ds must be capablebase plate length parallel t m ment directi n, in.f transferring shear l ads, axial l ads, and bending m -c lumn flange width, in.ments t the supp rting f undati n.verall c lumn depth, in.Typically, these beam-c lumn base plates have been
anch r r d distance fr m c lumn and base platedesigned and/ r analyzed by using service l ads r bycenterline parallel t m ment directi n, in.appr ximating the stress relati nship assuming the c m-base plate bearing interface cantilever directi npressi n bearing l cati n. The auth rs present an therparallel t m ment directi n, in.appr ach, using fact red l ads directly in a meth d c nsis-
tent with the equati ns f static equilibrium and the LRFD 0 95(1)Specificati n. 2
The m ment-resisting base plate must have designbase plate bearing interface cantilever perpendic-strengths in excess f the required strengths, flexural ( ),ular t m ment directi n, in.axial ( ), and shear ( ) f r all l ad c mbinati ns.
A typical beam-c lumn base plate ge metry is sh wn0 80in Figure 1, which is c nsistent with that sh wn n page (2)211-61 f the LRFD Manual.
base plate tensi n interface cantilever parallel tm ment directi n, in.
(3)2 2
c lumn flange thickness, in.
The pr gressi n f beam-c lumn l adings, in rder f in-creasing m ments, is presented in f ur l ad cases.
Case A is a l ad case with axial c mpressi n and shear,with ut bending m ment. This case results in a full lengthunif rm pressure distributi n between the base plate andthe supp rting c ncrete. This case is summarized in theLRFD Manual beginning n page 11-54 and is summa-rized herein f r c mpleteness.
Case B ev lves fr m Case A by the additi n f a smallbending m ment. The m ment changes the full lengthunif rm pressure distributi n t a partial length unif rmpressure distributi n, but is n t large en ugh t cause sepa-rati n between the base plate and the supp rting c ncrete.
Case C ev lves fr m Case B by the additi n f a spe-cific bending m ment such that the unif rm pressure dis-tributi n is the smallest p ssible length with ut separati n
f
u
u u
f
f
f
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / FIRST QUARTER / 199930
5
5
CASE A: NO MOMENT—NO UPLIFT
CASE B: SMALL MOMENT WITHOUT UPLIFT
�
�
�
�
�
M Pe
MM
ePP
P NM
Ne
Y N e
N Ye
Y
Fig. 2. No Moment - No Uplift
Fig. 3. Small Moment Without Uplift
�
� �
� �
�
�
o o oo o o o o oo o o o o
o o o o oo o o o
o o o o o oo o o
oo o o o
o o oo
oo o
o oo o o o o
o o oo o o
o o o o oo o
o o o o o o oo o o o o o o
o o o o o o o oo o o o o o
o o o o o
o oo o o o oo o o o o o
o o o oo o o
o oo o
o o oo o o
o
between the base plate and the supp rting c ncrete. This 1. Assume that the resultant c mpressive bearing stressc rresp nds t the c mm n elastic limit where any addi- is directly under the c lumn flange.ti nal m ment w uld initiate separati n between the base 2. Assume a linear strain distributi n such that the an-plate and the supp rting c ncrete. ch r r d strain is dependent n the bearing area
Case D ev lves fr m Case C by the additi n f suffi- strain.cient bending m ment t require anch r r ds t prevent 3. Assume independent strain distributi n.separati n between the base plate and the supp rting c n-
All three meth ds summarized by AISC assume a lin-crete. This is a c mm n situati n f r fixed base plates
ear triangular distributi n f the resultant c mpressivein structural ffice practice. That is, a rigid frame with a
bearing stress. This implies that the beam-c lumn basefixed base plate will usually attract en ugh bending m -
plate has n additi nal capacity after the extreme fiberment t require anch r r ds t prevent uplift f the base
reaches the c ncrete bearing limit state. The auth rs pr -plate fr m the supp rting c ncrete.
p se that a unif rm distributi n f the resultant c mpres-sive bearing stress is m re appr priate when utilizingLRFD.
If there is n bending m ment r axial tensi n at the base Case B, a beam-c lumn with a small m ment and nf a beam-c lumn, the anch r r ds resist shear l ads but uplift at the base plate elevati n, is sh wn in Figure 3.
are n t required t prevent uplift r separati n f the base The m ment is expressed as l cated at s me ec-plate fr m the f undati n. Case A, a beam-c lumn with centricity ( ) fr m the beam-c lumn neutral axis.n m ment r uplift at the base plate elevati n, is sh wnin Figure 2.
0
(4)0
06If the magnitude f the bending m ment is small relative
t the magnitude f the axial l ad, the c lumn anch r0r ds are n t required t restrain uplift r separati n f 6
the base plate fr m the f undati n. In service, they nly2resist shear. They are als necessary f r the stability f
the structure during c nstructi n.(5)AISC addresses three different variati ns f the elastic 2
meth d when using an ultimate strength appr ach f r thewhere:
design f beam-c lumn base plates subjected t bendingbearing length, in.m ment.
u u
u
uu
u
uu
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / FIRST QUARTER / 1999 31
3
1
�
CASE C: MAXIMUM MOMENT WITHOUTUPLIFT
CONCRETE BEARING LIMIT STATE
LRFD Specification Requirements
CASE D: MOMENT WITH UPLIFT
�
�
�
�
� �
�
�
N
Me
P
P NM
M Ne e
P
P NM
PNe
NY N e N
Y N
P P
NP . f A
Fig. 5. Moment With Uplift
Fig. 4. Maximum Moment Without Uplift
� �
�
� �
�
�
� �
�
o o oo o
o o oo oo oo o o
o o o oo oo
o o o
o o oo o o
o oo o o
o o
o oo o o o
o o oo
o oo
o o o o oo o o
shear. Case D, a beam-c lumn with sufficient m ment tcause uplift at the base plate elevati n, is sh wn in Figure5. This is the m st c mm n case in design practice, espe-The maximum m ment with ut base plate uplift is as-cially f r rigid frames designed t resist lateral earthquakesumed t ccur when the c ncrete bearing limit state isr wind l adings n the building r structure.reached ver a bearing area c ncentric with the applied
l ad at its maximum eccentricity. If the eccentricity ex-
ceeds , the tendency f r uplift f the plate is assumed t6
ccur. This assumes a linear pressure distributi n in acc r-dance with elastic the ry and n tensi n capacity betweenthe base plate and supp rting c ncrete surfaces. Case C, abeam-c lumn with the maximum m ment with ut upliftat the base plate elevati n, is sh wn in Figure 4.
(4)
06
(4) (7)6
06 T satisfy static equilibrium at the c ncrete bearing limit
state, the centr id f the c ncrete bearing reacti n ( )must be aligned with the line- f-acti n f the applied axial6l ad.
2 26
2 The LRFD Specificati n defines the c ncrete bearing(6)3 limit state in Secti n J9.
(8)
When the m ment at the beam-c lumn base plate exceeds On the full area f a c ncrete supp rt:, anch r r ds are designed t resist uplift as well as
0 85 (LRFD J9-1)6
u
u
uu
u
u
uu
p
u c p
p c
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / FIRST QUARTER / 199932
12
11
2 2
1 1
12
2 1
12
12
1
22
1
22
1
2
1
2
2
1
12
2 1
1
�
�
� �
�
� �
Case B: Small Moment Without Uplift
Practical Design Procedure—Required Area
Case C: Maximum Moment Without Uplift
Case D: Moment with Uplift
Case A: No Moment - No Uplift
��
�
���
�
�
�
�
��
�
�
� �
�
�� �
�
A BYAP . f A
A Y N e
A AP . . f BY . . f BYA A
P qY
P q N efA
A q AA yy ee P
eN
P MP P
M P eN
eq
A BYA
q . f B . f BA Y N
Aq . . f B . . f B AA P . . f BY . . f BY
BYA
q . f B . f B AA P . f B N . f B N
B N
P . qNA
NA M P e P
M . qN
AA
P M f B f
A BN AP . f BY qYA AP . . f BN . . f BN
A Me
PP qN
���
� �
�
� �
�
� ��
�
�
��
� � � �� �
� �
�
�
� �
�
� �
� �� �
� �� �
�
�� �
�
� � �
�
� �
�
�
�� �
�� �
�
�
�
� �
�
o o o
o o oo o
o o o o o o oo o o oo
o o o o o o oo o o o oo o o
o o
o o oo o o o o
o
o
o o
o o o
o o o o oo o o o
o o o
o o o o
o o o o oo o o
o o o o o
o o
On less than the full area f a c ncrete supp rt:
0 85 (LRFD J9-2)( 2 )
2 (0 60)(0 85) (0 60)(0 85) (2)
where:
c mpressi n resistance fact r = 0.60 ( 2 ) (12)specified c ncrete c mpressive strength, ksi
N te that equati n 12 is n t a cl sed f rm s luti n be-area f steel c ncentrically bearing n a c ncretecause;supp rt, in.
maximum area f the p rti n f the supp rting is a functi n f ,surface that is ge metrically similar t and c n- is a functi n f ,centric with the l aded area, in. is a functi n f , and
is a functi n f .
H wever, if is defined as s me fixed distance r asSelect base plate dimensi ns such that: s me percentage f , the c rresp nding maximum values
f and can be determined directly.(8)
And n ting that:
(9) As previ usly stated, Case C is the situati n where uplift
is imminent and .F r c nvenience, define a new variable, , the c ncrete6bearing strength per unit width (K/in).
0 85 0 85 (2) 2(6)
3
(0 60)(0 85) (0 60)(0 85) (2)(0 60)(0 85) (0 60)(0 85) (2)
0 51 1 02 (10) 2 20 51 1 02
23 3F r m st c lumn base plates bearing directly n a c n- 3crete f undati n, the c ncrete dimensi n is much greaterthan the base plate dimensi n, and it is reas nable t 0 667 (13)
assume that the rati 2. F r m st c lumn( )
6base plates bearing n gr ut r a c ncrete pier, the c n-crete (gr ut) dimensi n is equal t the base plate dimen-
0 111 (14)si n, and it is reas nable t c nservatively take the rati
1.
Given the f ll wing:, , , , , inches & kips
0 85 (15)(0 60)(0 85) (0 60)(0 85) (2)
(4)(11)
p c
u c c
u
c u
c
u
u uu c p
u u
c cc c
c cu c c
c cu c c
u
u u u
u
u u c c
c p c c
u c cu
uu
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / FIRST QUARTER / 1999 33
3
vertical
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2 2
2
2
�
� �
�
�
�
ANCHOR ROD SHEAR AND TENSION LIMITSTATES
LRFD Specification Requirements
Required Strength
Practical Design Procedure—Rod Sizes
�
� �
�
�
� � �
�
� � �
�� �
� � ����� � � ���
�
� � �
��
�� � �
�
�� � � �
�
�
� � � �
T Y
F
T P P V F A
T qY P T F A
T F . f
N YP f P e f
F . fN Y
qY f P e f
VqYN qY .
qY f P e fFA
q N TY q f Y P e fFf
VY fA
aY bY c
Fb b acY
a
Fq f q f P f e
Y
f
N N P f e VY f f fq A
TY
T qY P
Y
N Y VqY f P e f V . F A
�
�
�
�
�
�
� � � �
� �
� �
� � � �
� � � �
� �
�
�
�
�
� �
� �
� �
� �
� �
� �
� �
�
� �
� �
� �
�
� � �
o o o o o oo o o o
o o oo o o o o o
o o
o oo o o oo o o
o o o
o oo o o
oo o o o
o oo
o oo o o
o
o o
o o o
oo o
o o oo o oo o o
o o o oo
o oo
Tw equati ns will be needed t s lve f r the tw un-kn wns, the required tensile strength f the anch r r ds,
, and bearing length, .T maintain static equilibrium, the summati n f verti-
cal f rce must equal zer : The LRFD Specificati n defines the anch r r d (b lts)shear and tensi n limit states in Secti ns J3.6 and J3.7,
0 and Tables J3.2 and J3.5.
0 (21)
(16) (22)
F r ASTM A307 b lts:T maintain static equilibrium, the summati n f m mentstaken ab ut the f rce must equal zer : 59 1 9 45 (Table J3.5)
F r ASTM A325 b lts, threads excluded fr m the shear( ) 0 plane:2 2
117 1 5 90 (Table J3.5)
( ) 0 (17) where:2 2required anch r r d shear strength, kipsanch r r d resistance fact r 0 75
( ) 0n minal shear strength, ksi2 2anch r r d n minal (gr ss) area, in.required anch r r d tensile strength, kips( ) 0 (18)
2 2 n minal tensile strength, ksianch r r d shear stress, ksi
This is in the f rm f a classic quadratic equati n, withunkn wn . (23)
0 (19) F r A307 b lts:
24 ksi (Table J3.2)4F r A325 b lts when threads are excluded fr m the shear2plane:
60 ksi (Table J3.2)4 [ ( )]
2The shear stress ( ) is calculated c nsidering the requiredshear strength f the c lumn base.
2 ( )(20) (24)2 2
where:T determine the ther unkn wn, , substitute the value
number f r ds sharing shear l ad, unitlessf r int the equati n:
N te that all the base plate anch r r ds are c nsidered(16)effective in sharing the shear l ad.
As a check, back substitute the value f r int theequati n:
( ) 0 (17) 0 75 (25)2 2
u
u u c p vub b
u u tub b
u t v
c p u
t v
u
ub
uv
b
ubut
v
ubv
b
v
vqN Nu
q
v
u ubv
v b
uv
u u
uu vub b
v
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / FIRST QUARTER / 199934
2
2
8 9
3 6
2
27
3
2
�
�
BASE PLATE FLEXURAL YIELDING LIMITSTATE
LRFD Specification Requirements
Required Strength—Tension Interface
Required Strength—Bearing InterfaceNominal Strength
�
�
�
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
����
�
� �
VF .
A mM f
TT . F A
nM f
f
dbn
nM f
c m n n
cM f
n
Fc
n
M M
M M
M x
MT xM
MB
m n f tM M F
P M
�
�
�
� �
� �
� �
� �
� �
�
�
�
�
� �
�
�
o o o
o o o
o o o o
o o o o o oo o o o
oo o o o oo o o o o
o o oo o o o o o o o o oo o o
o oo o o
o o oo o o o o
o o o oo o o
o o oo oo o
o o o o
o o oo oo o
o o o oo o o
oo o
oo o o o o o o
o o o oo
o o o oo
o o oo
o
oo oo
o oo
On secti n parallel t c lumn flanges:59 1 9 45 (26)
(29)2
0 75 (27)On secti n parallel t c lumn web:
where:
(30)number f r ds sharing tensi n l ad, unitless 2
N te that all f the base plate anch r r ds are n t c n- where:sidered effective in sharing the tensi n l ad. F r m st base
c ncrete bearing stress, ksiplate designs, nly half f the anch r r ds are required tresist tensi n f r a given l ad c mbinati n. The bearing pressure may cause bending in the base plate
The embedment, edge distances, and verlapping shear in the area between the flanges, especially f r lightly l adedc nes f the anch r r ds int the c ncrete must be checked c lumns. Yield line the ry is used t analyze this c n-t assure that the design tensile strength als exceeds the siderati n.required tensile strength. This check sh uld be in acc r-dance with the appr priate c ncrete design specificati n, (31)
4and is bey nd the sc pe f this paper.It sh uldben ted thatbaseplateh lesare ften versized ( )
(32)withrespect t theanch rr ds. In thiscase, s me“slippage”2may be necessary bef re the anch r r d shear limit state
is reached. F r large shear l ads, the designer may ch se Let the larger f , , and :t investigate alternate shear transfer limit states inv lvingpretensi ned b lts, fricti n and/ r shear lugs.
(33)2
where:
yield line the ry cantilever distance fr m c lumnThe entire base plate cr ss-secti n can reach the specifiedweb r c lumn flange, in.yield stress ( ).largest base plate cantilever, in.
N te that f r m st base plate ge metries, the cantileverdimensi n ( ) is very small and “c rner bending” f the
TheLRFDSpecificati n defines theflexuralyielding limitbase plate is neglected. When the dimensi n is large t
state in Secti n F1.acc mm date m re anch r r ds r m re bearing surface,c rner bending plate m ments sh uld be c nsidered and(28)used in the base plate thickness calculati ns.
(LRFD F1-1)
where:The tensi n n the anch r r ds will cause bending in the
required base plate flexural strength, in-K base plate f r the cantilever distance .flexural resistance fact r = 0.90 F r a unit width f base plate:n minal flexural strength, in-Kplastic bending m ment, in-K
(34)
The bearing pressure between the c ncrete and the baseF r a unit width f base plate:plate will cause bending in the base plate f r the cantilever
distances and . The bearing stress, (ksi), is calculated(35)c nsidering the required axial and flexural strength f the 4
c lumn base, and respectively.
ubt
bppl
utub b
t
pplt
p
,
f
,
ppl
ppl
y
nbpl
n p
pl
b
n
uppl
p pn p y
u u
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / FIRST QUARTER / 1999 35
( )
22
( )
( )
2( )
2
( )
( )
( )
23
( )
�
�
Practical Design Procedure—Bearing Interface Case D: Moment with UpliftBase Plate Thickness
Practical Design Procedure—Tension Interface BasePlate Thickness
DESIGN EXAMPLE 1
Case A: No Moment—No Uplift
Case B: Small Moment Without Uplift
Case C: Maximum Moment Without Uplift
�
�
�
� �
� � �
� �
� � �
Pf
BYt
M MT x
t .M M BF
t Y mcf . F
Pt . c
BYFf
t . cF Y m
P mt .
BF
M M
tT x. F
B
T xt .
BF
Pf
BN
Pt . c
BNF
P Pf
BY B N e
Pt . c
B N e F
P P . Pf
BY BNB Nm .
. Pt . c x .
BNF
Fig. 6. Design Example 1
Required:
Solution:
�� � �
� �
�
��
�
�
�
�
�
� � � �
� �
�
�
��
�
��
��
�
�
�
�
�
��
�
� �
o oo o o
o oo o
o o
o
(44)Setting the design strength equal t the n minal strengthand s lving f r the required plate thickness ( ): F r all cases:
(28)2 11 (45)
(LRFD F1-1)
If :0 90
2 41 49 (46)
1 49 (36)If :
2 11 (47)
Setting the design strength equal t the n minal strengthand s lving f r the required plate thickness:
(28)
0 904
2 11 (37)
(38)
1 49 (39)
(40)( 2 )
1 49 (41) a) Design anch r r ds( 2 )b) Determine base plate thickness
1. Dimensi ns:1 5(42)
22.0 in. 0.95(12.12 in.)5 24 in. (1)
2
1 5 16.0 in. 12.12 in. 0.605 in.1 49 (43) 2 24 in. (3)
2 2 2
up
p
nbplu
p reqn p y
pp y
up req
yp
p reqy
Yu
p reqy
pbpl
puy
up req
y
up
up req
y
u up
up req
y
u u up
up req
y
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / FIRST QUARTER / 199936
2
34
2
2
2
5
( )
2.27 in.2
( )
�
�
Select: Base Plate 2 20 1’-10
o.k.
DESIGN EXAMPLE 2
o.k.
o.k.
Select: 4 - 3/4 in. Diameter Anchor Rods
� �
� � �
�
�
� �
� � � �
� � � �
�
� �
� �
� �
�
� �
� �
� �
�
� �
� �� � �
� � �� �
� �
�
� � ��
e .
N. . e, Case D
q .
q .
Nf .
f e . .
.Y . .
.
. . .
T .
.V
F A .
V
.F . .
T
F A .
T
Y . . m, n nP
. Mt .
m .t .
x .controls
Fig. 7. Design Example 2
Required:
Solution:
��
�
� �
�
� �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
��
�
o o o oo o
o o o
oo o o
o o oo o
o o oo
o
o
2. Eccentricity:
6. Check bearing n c ncrete bel w gr ut layer120 ft-K(12 in./ft)11 08 in. (4) The gr ut is 2 in. thick. Assume that the c ncrete130K
extends at least 2 in. bey nd gr ut in each directi n.22.0 in.
3 67 in. 11 08 in. (7)6 6 (24 in.)(6.67 in.)
(0 51)(4 ksi)(20.0 in.) (10)(20 in.)(2.27 in.)
3. C ncrete bearing:76.6 K/in. 61.2 K/in. used in designAssume the bearing n gr ut area will g vern.
(0 51)(6 ksi)(20.0 in.) 1 61.2 K/in. (10)
16.0 in. 22.0 in.19 0 in.
2 2 2
16.0 in.11 08 in. 19 08 in.
2
2(130)(19 08)19 0 (19 0) (20)
61 2
19 0 16 73 2 27 in.
61 2 K/in.(2.27 in.) 130 K 8.92 K (16)
4. Anch r r d shear and tensi n:Check 4 in. dia. anch r r ds
30 0 K7.50 K (25)
4
0 75(24 ksi)(0.4418 in. )
7.96 K 7.50 K
7 50 K59 1 9 26 7 ksi (26)
0.4418 in.
8.92 K4.46 K (27)
2
a) Determine required tensile strength0 75(26.7 ksi)(0.4418 in. )b) Determine base plate thickness
8.85 4.46 K
N te that this pr blem is Example 16 fr m the AISCC lumn Base Plate Steel Design Guide Series.5. Base plate flexural yielding:
1. Required strength: (LRFD A4-2)2 27 in. 5 24 in. and n t applicable
1.2(21K) 1.6(39K) 87.6K(8 92 K)(2.24 in.) 1.2(171 in.-K) 1.6(309 in.-K) 700 in.-K2 11 0.35 in. (45)(20.0 in.)(36 ksi)
2. Dimensi ns:14.0 in. 0.95(7.995 in.)
3 20 in. (1)(130 K) 5.24 in. 22 11 (47)(20.0 in.)(36 ksi) 11.0 in. 7.995 in. 0.435 in.
1 72 (3)2 2 21.82 in.
u
ub
v b
ub
t
ub
t b
ub
u
up req
p req
�
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / FIRST QUARTER / 1999 37
3
2
5
( )
2.45 in.2
( )
14
5
14
14
12
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Required Tensile Strength 17.3 KREFERENCES
Select: Base Plate 1 14 1 -2
NOMENCLATURE
� �
� � �
� �
� � � �
� � � �
�
� �
� �
� �
� �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
e.
N. . e, Case D
q .
Nf .
f e .
. .Y . .
.
. . .
T .
Design Of Welded Structures
Y . . m, n nStructural Steel Design, LRFD Approach
.t . .
. Man-t .ual Of Steel Construction, Load & Resistance FactorDesign
controls Col-umn Base Plates
Engineering Journal,
Design.Of Anchor Bolts In Petrochemical Facilities
.Engineering Journal
.
Engineering Journal
.
A
��
�
� �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
� �
�
�
�
o o o oo o o o o
o o o
o o oo o o o o
o o oo o
o oo o o o
o oo o oo o
o o o o o oo o o
o oo o
o o oo o
o
o
oo o o
o o o o
o o o
o oo o o
o o o o o oo o o o
o oo oo
o o o o o o o oo o
o o o o oo
o o o o o oo o o o o
o oo o o o
o o o oo o oo
3. Eccentricity: f r the design f the anch r r ds is slightly smallerbecause the centr id f the c mpressi n reacti n is700 in.-K
7.99 in. (4) a greater distance fr m the anch r r ds.87 6 K
14.0 in.2 33 in. 7 99 in. (7)
6 6 A meth d l gy has been presented that summarizes the4. C ncrete bearing: design f beam-c lumn base plates and anch r r ds using
fact red l ads directly in a manner c nsistent with the(0 51)(3 ksi)(14 in.) 4 42.8 K/in. (10) equati ns f static equilibrium and the LRFD Specifi-
cati n. Tw design examples have been presented. A11.0 in. 14.0 in.12 5 in. direct c mparis n was made with a pr blem s lved by2 2 2
an ther AISC meth d.11.0 in. The step-by-step meth d l gy presented will be benefi-7 99 in. 13.49 in.
2 cial in a structural design ffice, all wing the design prac-titi ner t use the same fact red l ads f r the design f the
2(87 6)(13 49)steel structure, base plate, and anch r r ds. In additi n the12 5 ( 12 5) (20)
42 8 unif rm “rectangular” pressure distributi n will be easiert design and pr gram than the linear “triangular” pressure12 5 10 05 2 45 in.distributi n utilized in all wable stress design and ther
42 8 K/in.(2.45 in.) 87.6 K 17.3 K (16) published LRFD f rmulati ns.
5. Base plate flexural yielding: 1. Bl dgett, Omer W., ,1966.2 45 in. 3 20 in. and n t applicable
2. Smith, J. C., ,2nd Editi n, 1996.(17 3 K)(1.72 in.)
2 11 0 51 in. (45) 3. American Institute f Steel C nstructi n (AISC),(14.0 in.)(36 ksi)“L ad and Resistance Fact r Design Specificati n f rStructural Steel Buildings”, December 1, 1993.
(87 6 K) 3.20 in. 4. American Institute fSteelC nstructi n (AISC),2 11 (47)(14.0 in.)(36 ksi)
, 2nd Editi n, V lume 2, 1994.1.24 in. 5. American Institute f Steel C nstructi n (AISC),
, Steel Design Guide Series, 1990./6. Shipp, J.G., and Haninger, E.R., “Design Of Headed
6. C mparis n: Anch r B lts,” V l 20, N . 2,AISC s luti n f r this pr blem: (2nd Qtr.), pp 58-69, AISC, 1983.
7. American S ciety f Civil Engineers (ASCE),Required Anch r R d Tensile Strength 21 2 K, pp 4-3 t
Select: Base Plate 1 / 14 1 -2 4-8, 1997.Length f triangular c mpressi n bl ck 5 1 in. 8. Th rnt n, W. A., “Design f Small Base plates f r
Wide-Flange C lumns,” , V l 27,Auth r’s s luti n f r this pr blem:
N . 3, (3rd Qtr.), pp 108-110, AISC, 1990a.Required Anch r R d Tensile Strength 17 3 K 9. Th rnt n, W. A., “Design f Small Base plates f r
Wide-FlangeC lumns-AC ncatenati n fMeth ds,”Select: Base Plate 1 / 14 1 -2, V l 27, N . 4, (4th Qtr.), pp 108-
Length f rectangular c mpressi n bl ck 110, AISC, 1990b.2 45 in.
Remarks:
area f steel c ncentrically bearing n a c ncreteThe auth rs’ s luti n yields the identical basesupp rt, in.plate size and thickness. Required tensile strength
u
p req
p req
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / FIRST QUARTER / 199938
2
2
2
���
� ���
�� �
�� �� ��� ��� ��
��
������
�����������
A def
AB f
fF fF mFM nMM nM
qN
tPtPxT
TVVYbc
��
�
�
o o o o o o oo o oo o o o o
o o o o o o oo o o o
o oo o oo
o o oo
o o o oo o o
o oo o oo o o
oo o o o
o oo oo o
o o ooo o
o o oo o o ooo o o
maximum area f the p rti n f the supp rting c lumn verall depth, in.surface that is ge metrically similar t and c n- axial eccentricity, in.centric with the l aded area, in. anch r r d distance fr m c lumn and base plateanch r r d n minal (gr ss) area, in. centerline parallel t m ment directi n, in.base plate width perpendicular t m ment direc- specified c ncrete c mpressive strength, ksiti n, in. c ncrete bearing stress, ksin minal tensile strength, ksi anch r r d shear stress, ksin minal shear strength, ksi base plate bearing interface cantilever parallelspecified minimum yield stress, ksi t m ment directi n, in.n minal flexural strength, in.-K base plate bearing interface cantilever perpen-plastic bending m ment, in.-K dicular t m ment directi n, in.required base plate flexural strength, in.-K yield line the rycantileverdistancefr mc lumn
web r c lumn flange, in.required flexural strength, in.-Kc ncrete ( r gr ut) bearing strength per unitbase plate length parallel t m ment directi n,width, kips/in.in.c lumn flange thickness, in.n minal bearing l ad n c ncrete, kipsbase plate thickness, in.required axial strength, kipsbase plate tensi n interface cantilever parallel trequired tensile strength, kipsm ment directi n, in.required anch r r d tensile strength, kipsanch r r d resistance fact r = 0.75required shear strength, kipsflexural resistance fact r = 0.90required anch r r d shear strength, kipsc mpressi n resistance fact r = 0.60bearing length, in.number f r ds sharing tensi n l ad, unitlessc lumn flange width, in.number f r ds sharing shear l ad, unitlesslargest base plate cantilever, in.
b
c
p
t v
v
y
n
p
pl
u
p f
pu
u
ub
u
bub
c
tf
v