Bc 466737 the Corrupt Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles in False Vexatious...
4
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
jose-salazar -
Category
Documents
-
view
32 -
download
2
description
The Law is what the Judge on the Bench says the law is, regardless of the evidence, of the cases on record, of common sense, of the rules of the court, of the code of civil procedure. If Judge Hickok made a ruling using a fake case, it amounts as planting a gun, or drugs on any citizen of the United States. For years and years, the Los Angeles Superior Court is where Corruption is rampant by some clerks, court clerks and some judges that receive bribes to tip the balance in favor of represented civilians. It is in fact a white country club that one can ONLY receive substantive justice if you hire an Officer of the Court! Then, pray that the Judge on the bench, an attorney wearing a black robe, is not corrupt like DeVanon, Hickok, Miller, Drewry, Dodson, Levine, and others. Judge Glennon at the Van Nuys Courthouse said it clearly: "the old way of "doing business" in the court is over". He was forced to step down from my case! the system is protecting some crook judges!!! DeVanon was removed for his lies, and not because of the budget! for proof of his lies: "He never contacted the court" this is a lie that cost me my house! and then "let me get some", as DeVanon was soliciting money from an investment of $113,262.25 made at sonia maria mercado's bank with settlement money of my brother, who was killed at county jail!
Transcript of Bc 466737 the Corrupt Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles in False Vexatious...
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DATE: 06/29/12
HONORABLE CAROLYN B. KUHL
HONORABLE
J. O'NEAL, C.A.
JUDGEII R. AQUINO
JUDGE PRO TEM
Deputy Sheriff" NONE
DEPT. 1
DEPUTY CLERK
ELECTRONIC RECORDING MONITOR
Reporter
VSESTATE OF ROBERT BERKE ET AL
Defendant NO APPEARANCECounsel
2:30 pmlBC466737
JOSE CASTANEDA
(NO LEGAL FILE) Plaintiff
Counsel
NO APPEARANCE
FEE WAIVER PENDING/GRANTED
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:
COURT ORDER
Joseph Castaneda was deemed a vexatious litigantby the Los Angeles Superior Court in Case No.BC466737 pursuant to Code of civil Procedure Section391 and was barred from filing new litigationwithout leave of court pursuant to Code of CivilProcedure Section 391.7. Plaintiff's exhibit 7.
On 4/2/12, Plaintiff submitted a "Motion andOpposition to Illegal, Corrupt Order by the Courton March 28, 2012." On 4/5/12, Plaintiff submittedsupplemental papers requesting judicial noticeof certain cases and for sanctions. The courthas reviewed all of Plaintiff's papers.
Plaintiff's request to reverse Judge Hickok'sorder is denied. This court cannot vacate a
ruling by another judicial officer findingthat Plaintiff was a vexatious litigant.It is improper for one trial judge to reviewthe decision of another trial judge. Thisrule is designed to preserve the integrityof the courts and to prevent forum shopping.Geddes v. Superior Court (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th417, 425-426j In re Alberto (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 421. As such, Plaintiff's request to reverseJudge Hickok's order and for another evidentiaryhearing to review the evidence on which Judge
Page I of 4 DEPT. 1MINUTES ENTERED06/29/12COUNTY CLERK
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DATE: 06/29/12
HONORABLE CAROLYN B. KUHL
HONORABLE
J. O'NEALr C.A.
JUDGE I I R. AQUINO
JUDGE PRO TEM
Deputy Sheriffll NONE
DEPT. 1
DEPUTY CLERK
ELECTRONIC RECORDING MONITOR
Reporter
(NO LEGAL FILE) Plaintiff
Counsel2:30 pmlBC466737JOSE CASTANEDA
VSESTATE OF ROBERT BERKE ET AL
FEE WAIVER PENDING/GRANTED
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:
Hickok relied is denied.
NO APPEARANCE
Defendant NO APPEARANCECounsel
Plaintiff's motion to consolidate pending anddismissed cases filed in the Northeast DistrictrPasadena; the Southwest Districtr Torrance andthe Central District is also denied. The requestis properly made after all cases have been relatedinto a single departmentr and must be determinedby that department. L.A. County Superior CourtRule 3.3.
Plaintiff's motion for sanctions for conduct in
connection with the underlying Motion for an OrderFinding Defendant to be a Vexatious Litigant isdenied as that matter is properly brought beforethe trial court. AdditionallYr sanctions underCode of Civil Procedure Section 128.5 is deniedas that statute does not apply to conduct arisingfrom claims initiated after 12/31/94. Olmstead v.Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 804r 807.
Plaintiff's request for sanctions under Code ofCivil Procedure Section 128.7 is denied on theadditional ground that Plaintiff did not complywith the procedural requirements of that statuterequiring that the motion be made separately andbe filed with the court 21 days after service ofthe motion on opposing parties. California Codeof Civil Procedure Section 128.7.
Based on the foregoingr Plaintiff's motion is
Page 2 of 4 DEPT. 1MINUTES ENTERED06/29/12COUNTY CLERK
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DATE: 06/29/12
HONORABLE CAROLYN B. KUHL
HONORABLE
J. O'NEAL, C.A.
JUDGEII R. AQUINO
JUDGE PRO TEM
Deputy Sheriffll NONE
DEPT. 1
DEPUTY CLERK
ELECTRONIC RECORDING MONITOR
Reporter
VSESTATE OF ROBERT BERKE ET AL
Defendant NO APPEARANCECounsel
2:30 pmlBC466737
JOSE CASTANEDA
(NO LEGAL FILE) Plaintiff
Counsel
NO APPEARANCE
By:
FEE WAIVER PENDING/GRANTED
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:
denied in its entirety.
The Clerk is to give notice.
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, the below-named Executive Officer/Clerk of theabove-entitled court, do hereby certify that I amnot a party to the cause herein, and that on thisdate I served the minute orderupon each party or counsel named below by placingthe document for collection and mailing so as tocause it to be deposited in the United States mailat the courthouse in Los Angeles,California, one copy of the original filed/enteredherein in a separate sealed envelope to each addressas shown below with the postage thereon fully prepaid,in accordance with standard court practices.
Dated: 6/29/12
John A. ctarke, Exec~ive Officer/Clerk
i!'~NI--~~~_ .. R. AQUINO
Page 3 of 4 DEPT. 1MINUTES ENTERED06/29/12COUNTY CLERK
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DATE: 06/29/12
HONORABLE CAROLYN B. KUHL
HONORABLE
J. O'NEAL, C.A.
JUDGEII R. AQUINO
JUDGE PRO TEM
Deputy Sheriff II NONE
DEPT. 1
DEPUTY CLERK
ELECTRONIC RECORDING MONITOR
Reporter
VSESTATE OF ROBERT BERKE ET AL
Defendant NO APPEARANCECounsel
2:30 pmlBC466737
JOSE CASTANEDA
(NO LEGAL FILE) Plaintiff
Counsel
NO APPEARANCE
FEE WAIVER PENDING/GRANTED
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:
JOSE CASTANEDA1377 RUTAN WAYPASADENA, CA ,91104
R. SAMUEL PAZLAW OFFICES OF R. SAMUEL PAZ5711 WEST SLAUSON AVENUE, SUITE 100CULVER CITY, CA 90230
STEPHEN R. RYKOFF, ESQ.11355 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD, SUITE 100LOS ANGELES, CA 90064,
SARAH L. OVERTON, ESQ.CUMMINGS, MCLCLOREY, DAVIS, ACHO &
ASSOCIATES, P.C.3801 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 560RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
Page 4 of 4 DEPT. 1MINUTES ENTERED
06/29/12COUNTY CLERK
![VL-110 Request to File New Litigation by Vexatious Litigant › documents › vl110.pdfForm Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California VL-110 [Rev. September 1, 2018]](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/60c5177c8d3ae846c1659057/vl-110-request-to-file-new-litigation-by-vexatious-litigant-a-documents-a-vl110pdf.jpg)
