BASIN ANALYSISdownload.e-bookshelf.de/download/0000/5989/79/L-G... · · 2013-07-23Basin Analysis...
Transcript of BASIN ANALYSISdownload.e-bookshelf.de/download/0000/5989/79/L-G... · · 2013-07-23Basin Analysis...
BASIN ANALYSIS
ABAPR 11/22/04 4:22 PM Page i
ABAPR 11/22/04 4:22 PM Page ii
Basin Analysis
Principles and Applications
Second Edition
Philip A. AllenDepartment of Earth Sciences,
ETH Zürich
John R. AllenBHP Billiton,
Australia
ABAPR 11/22/04 4:22 PM Page iii
© 1990, 2005 by Blackwell Science Ltda Blackwell Publishing company
BLACKWELL PUBLISHING350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
The right of Philip A. Allen and John R. Allen to be identified as the Author(s) of this Work has been asserted in accordance withthe UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or byany means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs, andPatents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
First edition published 1990Second edition published 2005 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Allen, P. A.Basin analysis : principles and applications / Philip A. Allen and John R. Allen. – 2nd ed.
p. cm.Includes bibliographical references and index.ISBN 0-632-05207-4 (pbk. : alk. paper)
1. Sedimentary basins. 2. Petroleum–Geology. I. Allen, John R. (John Richard), 1953– II. Title.
QE571.A45 2005552¢.5–dc22 2004005965
A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library.
Set in 9/11 pt Baskervilleby SNP Best-set Typesetter Ltd, Hong KongPrinted and bound in the United Kingdomby T J International, Padstow, Cornwall
The publisher’s policy is to use permanent paper from mills that operate a sustainable forestry policy, and which has been manufactured from pulp processed using acid-free and elementary chlorine-free practices. Furthermore, the publisher ensures thatthe text paper and cover board used have met acceptable environmental accreditation standards.
For further information onBlackwell Publishing, visit our website:www.blackwellpublishing.com
ABAPR 11/22/04 4:22 PM Page iv
Preface to second edition vii
PART 1 THE FOUNDATIONS OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS 1
1 Basins in their plate tectonic environment 3
Summary 31.1 Compositional zonation of the Earth 41.2 Rheological zonation of the Earth 71.3 Plate motion 81.4 Classification schemes of sedimentary
basins 12
2 The physical state of the lithosphere 20
Summary 202.1 Stress and strain 212.2 Heat flow: conduction and convection 312.3 Gravity and isostasy 452.4 Rock rheology 51
PART 2 THE MECHANICS OF SEDIMENTARY BASIN FORMATION 61
3 Basins due to lithospheric stretching 63
Summary 633.1 Introduction to rifts, failed rifts, and
passive continental margins 64
Contents
3.2 Geological and geophysical observations in regions of continental extension 65
3.3 Introduction to models of continental extension 73
3.4 Uniform stretching of the continental lithosphere 77
3.5 Modifications to the uniform stretching model 85
3.6 A dynamic approach to lithospheric extension 97
3.7 Mantle plumes and igneous activity associated with continental extension 106
3.8 Estimation of the stretch factor and strain rate history 112
4 Basins due to flexure 116
Summary 1164.1 Basic observations in regions of
lithospheric flexure 1194.2 Flexure of the lithosphere: geometry
of the deflection 1244.3 Flexural rigidity of the oceanic and
continental lithosphere 1304.4 Lithospheric buckling 1394.5 The dynamics of orogenic wedges 1444.6 The modeling of foreland basins 155
5 Effects of mantle dynamics 167
Summary 1675.1 Fundamentals and observations 1685.2 Dynamic topography 175
ABAPR 11/22/04 4:23 PM Page v
vi CONTENTS
6 Basins associated with strike–slip deformation 190
Summary 1906.1 Overview 1916.2 The structural pattern of strike–slip
fault systems 2016.3 Basins in strike–slip zones 207
PART 3 THE SEDIMENTARY BASIN-FILL 219
7 The sediment routing system 221
Summary 2217.1 Introduction 2227.2 Weathering 2227.3 Terrestrial sediment and solute
yields 2277.4 Measurements of erosion rates 2417.5 The functioning of sediment routing
systems 245
8 Basin stratigraphy 266
Summary 2668.1 A primer on process stratigraphy 2688.2 Stratigraphic cycles: definition and
recognition 2758.3 Driving mechanisms for stratigraphic
patterns 2868.4 Numerical simulation of stratigraphy 3068.5 Depositional systems 3118.6 Relation of depositional style to basin
setting 327
9 Subsidence and thermal history 349
Summary 3499.1 Introduction to geohistory analysis 3519.2 Porosity loss during basin subsidence 3519.3 Subsidence history and backstripping 3599.4 Introduction to thermal history 3669.5 Theory: the Arrhenius equation and
maturation indices 3679.6 Factors influencing temperatures and
palaeotemperatures in sedimentary basins 368
9.7 Measurements of thermal maturity in sedimentary basins 378
9.8 Application of thermal maturity measurements 391
9.9 Geothermal and paleogeothermal signatures of basin types 395
PART 4 APPLICATION TO PETROLEUM PLAY ASSESSMENT 403
10 The petroleum play 405
Summary 40510.1 From basin analysis to play concept 40610.2 The petroleum system and play
concept 40710.3 The petroleum charge system 41410.4 The reservoir 45210.5 The regional topseal 46710.6 The trap 474
References 495Index 532
ABAPR 11/22/04 4:23 PM Page vi
The first edition of Basin Analysis was written in 1988 and1989 and published in 1990. A decade and a half havetherefore passed since the writing of the first edition.Fifteen years is a long time between any two editions ofa popular textbook, but in the field of basin analysis it isan eternity. The field has exploded with new data, newtechnology, and new concepts. This second editionattempts to take account of these new developmentswhile retaining the successful basic structure and philo-sophy of the original text.
We originally defined basin analysis as the integratedstudy of sedimentary basins as geodynamic entities.This is even more the case today. It is now realized thatthe geodynamic system involving basin developmentmust also include the processes of rock exhumation,erosion and sediment transport in the source terrains ofsedimentary basins. In other words, the sediment supplyto a basin is more than simply a boundary condition. Thesediment efflux of eroding catchments is a thread linkingintimately coupled process systems governed by a wholespectrum of driving mechanisms. Tectonics affect catch-ment topography as well as basin subsidence. Climateaffects weathering and erosion as well as depositionalenvironments and sedimentary products. Base-levelchange affects river incision and sediment transport aswell as accommodation in the basin. To understand abasin as a geodynamic entity therefore requires an appreciation of the coupling between mantle, litho-sphere, oceans, atmosphere, and land surface. The per-spective is expansive and multidisciplinary. Basin analysisis no more the preserve of the geophysicist than the strati-grapher. It is the classic integrative topic in the curric-ulum and in our research portfolios.
The second edition of Basin Analysis is a major updat-ing and reassessment of the first edition. We have
retained the basic structure of first considering the fun-damental physical state of the lithosphere before dis-cussing the two grand classes of lithospheric deformationrelevant to basin development – stretching and flexure.We have added a chapter on the effect of mantle dynam-ics, since it is now generally accepted that flow in themantle related to the subduction of oceanic slabs, plumeactivity, and the slow incubation of heat beneath super-continental assemblies impinge on basin development.Basins related to strike–slip motion continue to be treatedin their own chapter because of their specific, intimatelinkage to deformation within the principal displacementzone. The chapters on the basin-fill have been radicallyrevised. A new chapter on the erosional engine for sedi-ment delivery to basins has been included to reflect themassive and exciting advances in this area in the lastdecade. The discussion of basin stratigraphy highlightsits structure or architecture and proposes explanations interms of the external driving mechanisms or of theunforced, internal dynamics responsible. The techniquesnow used routinely in approaching problems in basinanalysis have much expanded. We have updated subsi-dence analysis and measurements of thermal maturity oforganic and nonorganic components of the basin-fill asthe staple diet of basin analysts, but have included newthermochronological and exposure dating tools that haverevolutionized our understanding of the rates of denuda-tion of source regions, storage, and transfer to basins.Finally, the section on the application to the petroleumplay has been retained, condensed, and updated toinclude the important petroleum system concept. Itremains a useful summary of the scientific basis for petro-leum geology and how many of the concepts and tech-niques discussed earlier in the book can be applied in acommercial arena.
Preface to second edition
ABAPR 11/22/04 4:23 PM Page vii
viii PREFACE
The educational or intellectual philosophy adopted inBasin Analysis is that it is necessary to build up under-standing by examining the underlying principles for theway in which basins function, rather than by presentinga blizzard of detail on the variability of the real world.We do not mean to be sectarian in the deductive versus
inductive debate. The messy ground-truth of sedimen-tary basins, their structure, thermal and subsidencehistory, and stratigraphic architecture, is that eachexample has its own set of attributes, or to be anthropo-morphic, its “individuality.” But it is not an easy task toinduct the functioning of basins from such a blizzard ofdetail. We therefore present wherever possible a simpli-fied but useful physical analysis, backed up where appro-priate with elementary calculus, as the means to enhanceour understanding of basins generically. A further advan-tage of this approach is that students become armed witha wider range of scientific tools that can be used in aspectrum of other Earth Science and non-Earth Scienceapplications. This is important in our current climate of fostering “transferable skills.” The use of this first-principles approach is necessarily uneven in the text.Where a mathematical derivation is an optional extra, itis boxed separately from the rest of the text so as not tointerrupt the flow. In most cases, however, the student willbenefit from working through the simple mathematicalanalysis, inserting typical parameter values, and derivinga quantitative result. We have tried to encourage this“interactiveness” by providing practical examples withsolutions on freely accessible web pages at ETH Zürich (www.erdw.ethz.ch/Allen).
Our perspective on developments over the last 15 yearsis that some hot issues have become luke warm, whereasothers that were previously invisible or dormant havebecome widely debated. Such is scientific progress. As anexample of the former, the art of sequence stratigraphy,with its controversial overemphasis on eustatic sea-levelchanges as the driving forces for stratigraphic packaging,has matured into a valuable observational tool with inter-pretation founded on a far better appreciation of thedynamics of accommodation generation and sedimentsupply. As an example of the latter, numerical models ofa multilayer lithosphere now provide new insights into arange of problems involving the dynamics of lithosphericcontraction and extension. A forceful and exciting com-munity of scientists is simultaneously providing keyobservations and models to enable such improved solid-Earth models to be coupled to basin development via thecritical interface of the Earth’s surface. Such a successfulmerging of geomorphology, geophysics, isotope geo-
chemistry, sedimentology, and structural geology sends a powerful message of the value of multidisciplinaryapproaches in the Earth Sciences.
The book is intended for undergraduates who havedone the prerequisite set of introductory courses in theEarth Sciences. Those who have emerged from a soundphysical sciences background will find this book more totheir liking, but those entering Earth Science from the lifeor environmental sciences should not despair. The bookshould also prove to be useful to postgraduate studentseither as a text for taught courses in basin analysis andpetroleum geology, or as a synthesis for doctoral studentsgrappling with research problems across a wide range ofEarth Science subdisciplines.
The writing of a textbook is a long, difficult road totread. Goodness knows why anyone volunteers to do it.Any attempt at “completeness” has to be abandoned atan early stage. First, completeness can mean vast docu-mentation of trivia. Second, attempts at completenessgenerally end in noncompletion. The book project thenbecomes a never-ending introspective diary. So to theacademic staff using this book, please be understandingif sufficient credit is not given to your work. To thestudent, please do not think that you should not be visit-ing the library for supplementary reading.
Apart from primary sources in research papers, thereare a number of textbooks and compilations or reviewsthat we have found valuable to consult and use. In thegeneral area of basin analysis is Ingersoll and Busby’svery useful compilation Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins
(1995). Einsele’s Sedimentary Basins (second edition, 2000),despite its title, is strongly focused on sedimentarygeology. Leeder’s Sedimentology and Sedimentary Basins
(1999) is a stimulating text whose subtitle “From Turbu-lence to Tectonics” perfectly reflects its contents. Theedited textbook by Reading (Sedimentary Environments, thirdedition, 1996) continues to be the best comprehensivesource of all matters sedimentological. In the area ofsurface processes, useful material can be found in Sum-merfield’s Global Geomorphology (1990) and its reincarna-tion as a multiauthor compilation in Geomorphology and
Global Tectonics (2000). Allen’s Earth Surface Processes (1997)provides a physically based approach to sediment routingand depositional processes, and Burbank and Anderson’sTectonic Geomorphology (2001) trail-blazes the importantarea of neotectonics and geomorphology. Turning togeophysics and dynamics, there is little competition forthe mighty Geodynamics by Turcotte and Schubert (secondedition, 2002). Very valuable material is also found inFowler’s The Solid Earth (1990) and Isostasy and Flexure of
ABAPR 11/22/04 4:23 PM Page viii
the Lithosphere by Watts (2001) is very helpfully focused onsome of the key issues underpinning basin development.Diagenesis: A Quantitative Perspective by Giles (1997) is a tour
de force in the area of compaction and diagenesis of thebasin-fill. Magoon and Dow’s edited volume The Petroleum
System (1994) is a valuable addition to the literature in thefield of petroleum geology.
The journal Basin Research has published a number of important thematic sets that provide ideal huntinggrounds for students of basin analysis: some examples are Foreland Basins edited by Allen, England, Watts andGrotzinger (1992), Cratonic Basins (1994) edited by Allen,Watts, Grotzinger and Royden, Supradetachment Basins
edited by Friedmann and Burbank (1995), Sediment Supply
to Basins edited by Hovius and Leeder (1998), Interactions
of Tectonics and Surface Processes in Landscape Evolution editedby Burbank and Pinter (1999), Processes and Controls in the
Stratigraphic Development of Extensional Basins edited byGupta and Cowie (2000), and Numerical and Physical Ex-
perimental Modelling of Stratigraphy edited by Burgess andPaola (2002). Readers are also referred to the compila-tion of papers entitled Tectonics and Topography, edited byEllis and Merritts, in the Journal of Geophysical Research
(1994), and Quantitative Dynamic Stratigraphy (1990) editedby Cross, which together kick-started many quantitativeapproaches to the coupling of tectonics, surfaceprocesses, and stratigraphy.
We are grateful for the help of many colleagues, espe-cially those who found time to look at drafts of bookchapters, including Alex Densmore and Nick Richardson(ETH Zürich), and Peter Burgess (Shell, Rijswijk). AlexDensmore has cotaught a basin analysis class with PAAfor several years and has provided much helpful input.Sonia Scarselli and Chris Krugh helped to assemble thepractical exercises and solutions available on the web.Maja Reichenbach kindly provided much secretarialhelp. We are once again grateful for the support of staffat Blackwell Publishing, particularly Delia Sandford andRosie Hayden in production and editor Debbie Seymour.Finally, we dedicate this volume to our families, Carolyn,Lorna, Frances, and Richard spread across England andSwitzerland, and Annette, Michael, and Robert in Mel-bourne, Australia.
PAA, JRA, Zürich
PREFACE ix
ABAPR 11/22/04 4:23 PM Page ix
ABAPR 11/22/04 4:23 PM Page x
PA R T
1 The foundations ofsedimentary basins
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 1
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 2
SUMMARY
Sedimentary basins are regions of prolonged subsidenceof the Earth’s surface. The driving mechanisms of sub-sidence are principally related to processes within therelatively rigid, cooled thermal boundary layer of theEarth known as the lithosphere. The lithosphere is com-posed of a number of plates which are in motion withrespect to each other. Sedimentary basins therefore existin a background environment of plate motion.
The Earth’s interior is composed of a number of com-positional and rheological zones. The main composi-tional zones are between crust, mantle and core, the crustcontaining relatively low density rocks overlain by a sedi-mentary cover. The mechanical and rheological divisionsdo not necessarily match the compositional zones.A fundamental rheological boundary is between the lithosphere and the underlying asthenosphere. The lithosphere is sufficiently rigid to comprise a number ofrelatively coherent plates. Its base is marked by a char-acteristic isotherm (c. 1330 °C) and is commonly termedthe thermal lithosphere, or alternatively mechanical lithosphere.The upper portion of the thermal lithosphere is able tostore elastic stresses over long time scales and is referredto as the elastic lithosphere. The continental lithosphere hasa strength profile with depth which suggests that a weak,ductile zone exists in the lower crust, separating a brittleupper crust and upper mantle, giving a jam-sandwichtype structure. The oceanic lithosphere, however, lacksthis low strength layer, its strength increasing with depthto the brittle–ductile transition in the upper mantle.
The relative motion of plates produces deformation,vulcanicity, and seismicity concentrated along theirboundaries, which are classified as divergent boundaries,such as the mid-ocean ridge spreading centres of the
ocean basins, convergent boundaries associated with largeamounts of shortening, such as continental collisionzones, and conservative boundaries characterized bystrike–slip deformation. Although the theory of plate tec-tonics has the premise that deformation is concentratedalong plate boundaries, the continental lithospheredeforms far from plate boundaries, and appears tobehave at geological time scales more like viscous sheetsthan as rigid stress guides.
Sedimentary basins have been classified principally interms of the type of lithospheric substratum (i.e., conti-nental, oceanic, transitional), their position with respectto the plate boundary (intracratonic, plate margin), andtype of plate motion nearest to the basin (divergent, con-vergent, transform). The formative mechanisms of sedi-mentary basins fall into a small number of categories,although all mechanisms may operate during the evolu-tion of a basin:• Isostatic consequences of changes in crustal/lithospheric thick-
ness, such as caused mechanically by lithosphericstretching, or purely thermally, as in the cooling andsubsidence of the oceanic lithosphere as it moves awayfrom oceanic spreading centres;
• loading (and unloading) of the lithosphere causes a deflec-tion or flexural deformation and therefore subsidence(and uplift), as in foreland basins;
• viscous flow of the mantle causes nonpermanent subsidence/uplift known as dynamic topography.From the point of view of lithospheric processes there
are two major groups of basins: (i) Basins due to litho-spheric stretching, belonging to the rift-drift suite, and (ii)basins formed primarily by flexure of continental andoceanic lithosphere.
C H A P T E R
1 Basins in their plate tectonic environment
Assumptions, hasty, crude and vain,
Full oft to use will Science deign;
The corks the novice plies today
The swimmer soon shall cast away
(A.H. CLOUGH, POEM (1840))
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 3
4 CHAPTER 1
Inspection of any map showing hydrocarbon occur-rences (e.g., St John et al. 1984) reveals their clusteredpattern. In general, provinces of hydrocarbon occur-rence correspond to the locations of sedimentary accu-mulations greater than about 1 km thick. Theseaccumulations include sedimentary basins in the strictsense, implying zones of pronounced subsidence (Ballyand Snelson 1980) but also carbonate bank build-ups on elevated oceanic crust, cratonic arches, and so on whichbecome fossilized in the geological record. However,sedimentary basins located at sites of prolonged and substantial subsidence are of overriding importance.
Historically, basin studies have developed from a numberof distinct viewpoints such as that of stratigraphicsequences and their relation to sea-level fluctuations (Sloss1950, 1963), the geosyncline (Kay 1947, 1951; Aubouin1965), and, more recently, the concept of plate tectonics(Dickinson 1974; Ingersoll 1988). The location of sedimen-tary basins and their driving mechanisms are intimatelyassociated with the motion of discrete, relatively rigid slabs,which together represent the cooled thermal boundarylayer of the Earth, and with the convective flow of theunderlying mantle. The outer shell of the Earth comprisesa relatively small number of these thin, relatively rigidplates, and they are in a state of motion with respect to eachother. Such motions set up plate boundary forces that maybe transferred considerable distances into the interior of theplates, so that sedimentary basins exist in a backgroundenvironment of stress set up by plate motion. The lithos-pheric plates are the surface manifestation of a slow thermalconvection in the mantle, and are subject to differentialthermal stresses along their bases. The mantle and litho-sphere therefore do not operate as independent systems. Wesee spectacular evidence for the interaction of mantleprocesses and the lithosphere in the volcanic and topo-graphic expression above plumes that have risen from thecore–mantle boundary. We also discern, though less spec-tacularly, the effects on mantle flow of the subduction ofcold slabs of oceanic crust at ocean–continent boundaries.
Some basic ideas on plate tectonics and Earth struc-ture are introduced in this chapter in so far as they helpto explain the location and evolution of sedimentarybasins. More exhaustive summaries can be found inWyllie (1971), Cox (1973), Le Pichon et al. (1973), Smith(1976), Bird (1980), Cox and Hart (1986), and Keareyand Vine (1996). Ingersoll and Busby (1995) is a collec-tion of individually written chapters of relevance to basinanalysis and plate tectonics.
The Earth’s interior is composed of a number ofessentially concentric zones that are defined on the basis
of either compositional changes, or mechanical/rheological changes.
1.1 COMPOSITIONAL ZONATION OF THEEARTH
There are three main compositional units; the crust,mantle, and core (Fig. 1.1).
1.1.1 Oceanic crust
The crust is an outer shell of relatively low density rocks.The oceanic crust is thin, ranging from approximately 4to 20 km in thickness, 10 km being “normal,” and withan average density of about 2900 kg m-3. It comprises anumber of layers that reflect its mode of creation: anupper veneer (layer 1) of unconsolidated or poorly consolidated sediments, generally up to 0.5 km thick; anintermediate layer 2 of basaltic composition, consistingof pillow lavas and associated products of submarineeruptions; and a layer 3 of gabbros and peridotites thatmay form the parent rocks which upon differentiationgive rise to the basalts of layer 2. The oceanic crust hasbeen thought to be distinctly layered in terms of velocityof seismic waves, but more recent views are that it pos-sesses a more gradual and continuous increase in veloc-ity with depth.
The lifetime of oceanic crust is short, despite the factthat it occupies about 60% of the surface of the Earth(c. 3.2 ¥ 109 km2). This is because as the oceanic crustcools during aging it becomes gravitationally unstablewith respect to the mantle; as a result it is consumed. Thisexplains why the oldest oceanic crust in today’s oceans isas young as Jurassic in age (c. 150 Ma). Compared to thecontinents, the oceanic crust therefore has a very shortlifespan.
1.1.2 Continental crust
The continental crust is thicker, ranging from 30 to 70 km, but with an “average” thickness of perhaps 35 km.It was originally thought to be divided into two layers,each with a distinct composition and density: (i) An upperlayer with physical properties similar to those of granites,granodiorites, or diorites overlain by a thin veneer ofsedimentary rocks. This so-called “granitic layer” has a thickness of between 20 and 25 km and a density of 2500–
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 4
2700 kg m-3. The term “granitic” is, however, misleading,since average densities are greater than that of granite;(ii) a lower layer of primarily basaltic composition, butthe pressure and temperature at depths in excess of
25 km imply that the rocks are granulites, or their highpressure, high temperature equivalents, eclogites oramphibolites. The density of this lower layer is2800–3100 kg m-3. These layers may not in reality be welldefined, and instead a more continuous variation of com-position with depth may exist.
Information on the density of crustal rocks has beenobtained largely by observations on seismograms of thespeed of seismic waves passing through the variouslayers, coupled with laboratory experiments on rockmaterials. The existence of a low velocity crust was dis-covered by the geophysicist Mohorovicic shortly after theturn of the century. At the crust–mantle boundary,seismic P (longitudinal) wave velocities increasemarkedly; this abrupt increase in velocity may reflect acorresponding increase in rock density (Fig. 1.1). Thishorizon is known as the Mohorovicic discontinuity orMoho. The Moho varies in depth considerably. The con-tinental crust thickens under orogenic belts, thins underzones of rifting, and attenuates completely at continen-tal margins (Fig. 1.2).
In some regions, particularly the attenuated margins of continents, the crust is intermediate in character andthickness between typical oceanic and continental varieties. This may be due to the injection of dense intrusions, to metamorphism, or to other processesaccompanying stretching. In particular, the depth to theMoho may be abnormally great due to the igneousunderplating of the crust during plume activity. Severalkilometers of underplate emplaced in the Early Tertiaryover the head of the Iceland plume have been interpretedfrom seismic experiments carried out on the northwestEuropean continental margin.
1.1.3 Mantle
The mantle is divided into two layers: the upper and lowermantle. The upper mantle extends to about 680 km ±20 km and is punctuated by phase transitions. The innermantle extends to the outer limit of the core at 2900 km,with an increasing density with depth.
Although there are of course no in situ measurementsof the composition of the mantle, it can be estimatedfrom the chemistry of volcanic and intrusive rocksderived by melting of the mantle, from tectonicallyemplaced slivers of mantle rock preserved in orogenicbelts known as ophiolites, from nodules preserved in vol-canic rocks, from minerals brought to the surface explo-sively in kimberlites, and importantly, from the remote
BASINS IN THEIR PLATE TECTONIC ENVIRONMENT 5
ContinentOcean
Moho
Low velocity zone
Phase boundary
Asthenosphere
Mesosphere
0 km
500 km
400 km
680 km
2900 km
5100 km
6378 km
0 km
Lower transition zone
Lithosphere
Core"D"
Crust Mantle lithosphere
(a)
(b)
Vp
Upper transition zone
Upp
erm
antle
Low
er m
antle
Out
erco
re
Inne
rco
re
[olivine]
[spinel]
[perovskiteand MgO]
8.0 8.5 9.0 km s–1
Fig. 1.1 The main compositional (a) and rheological (b)boundaries of the Earth. The most important compositionalboundary is between crust, mantle, and core. There are strongcompositional variations within the continental crust and com-positional variations caused by phase changes in the mantle. Vp
is velocity of P wave. The main rheological boundary is betweenthe lithosphere and the asthenosphere. P wave velocities increasemarkedly beneath the Moho, but decrease in a low velocity zonerepresenting the weak asthenosphere. The lithosphere is rigidenough to act as a coherent plate. P wave velocity in (a) fromwestern Europe after Hirn (1976).
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 5
20
20
20
30
30
25
40
50
30
40
4050
40
50
30
40
40
5050
30
4050
40
4050
30
30
20
3030
4030
40
30
15
45
40
NSNS
Alps
AP
PY
SC
H
25PB
C
5050
50
5040
20
3030
40
50
30
20
20
30
40
50
3020
203040
30
50
40
40
50
45
40
40
30
25
35
45
45
35
SR
SNAP
ME
GMGM
(a)
(b)
Contours in km below sea level
DEPTH TO MOHO
Fig. 1.2 Depth to the Moho below sea-level from (a) Europe and (b) North America, after Allenby and Schnetzler (1983) and Meissner (1986). In Europe, thick continental crust occurs in the Pyrenean–Alpine–Carpathian orogenic belt and in the Scandinavian Shield. Thin continental crust occurs along the Atlantic margin and in regions of continental stretching, such as theNorth Sea, western Mediterranean, Pannonian Basin, and Black Sea. In North America, thick continental crust is associated withthe batholiths of the Sierra Nevada region, the Appalachian orogenic belt, the American midcontinent and the Canadian–NE USAshield. Thin crust is associated with the plateau basalts of the Snake River area, sites of rifting such as the Mississippi Embayment,and along the western active continental margin, eastern passive continental margin and the Gulf of Mexico. NS, North Sea; SC,Scandinavian Shield; PY, Pyrenees; AP, Apennines; PB, Pannonian Basin; H, Hellenides; SR, Snake River; SN, Sierra Nevada; ME,Mississippi Embayment; AP, Appalachians; GM, Gulf of Mexico. Reproduced courtesy of Elsevier.
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 6
but sophisticated measurement of the mantle usingseismic waves. The main constituent of the mantle isthought to be olivine, mostly the Mg-rich varietyforsterite.
Olivine is known to undergo phase changes to denserstructures at pressures equivalent to depths of 390–450 km and c. 700 km in the Earth. At 390–450 kmolivine is thought to change to spinel via an exothermicreaction involving a 10% increase in density. At c. 700 kmspinel changes to perovskite and magnesium oxide in an endothermic reaction. These phase changes can be recognized by changes in the velocity of S waves(McKenzie 1983) and may determine the scale of con-vection in the mantle (Silver et al. 1988).
1.2 RHEOLOGICAL ZONATION OF THE EARTH
The mechanical or rheological divisions of the interiorof the Earth do not necessarily match the compositionalzones. One of the rheological zonations of primary interest to students of basin analysis is the differentiationbetween the lithosphere and the asthenosphere. This is because the vertical motions (subsidence, uplift) in sedimentary basins are principally a response to thedeformation of this uppermost rheological zone of theEarth.
1.2.1 Lithosphere
The lithosphere is the rigid outer shell of the Earth, com-prising the crust and the upper part of the mantle. It isof particular importance to note the difference betweenthe thermal and elastic thicknesses of the lithosphere. It is generally believed (e.g., Parsons and Sclater 1977;Pollack and Chapman 1977) that the base of the lithosphere is represented by a characteristic isotherm(1100–1330°C) at which mantle rocks approach theirsolidus temperature. This defines the thermal lithosphere.Typical thicknesses of lithosphere under the oceansvaries from c. 5 km at mid-ocean ridges to c. 100 km inthe coolest parts of the oceans. The lower boundary of the lithosphere is poorly defined under continents,depths of 100 to 250 km being typical. The stepwiseincreases in velocities of S and P waves with depththrough the lithosphere suggest that it contains composi-tional boundaries within it.
The rigidity of the lithosphere allows it to behave as acoherent plate but only the upper part of the lithosphereis sufficiently rigid to retain elastic stresses over geologi-cal time scales (say 107 years). Below this upper elastic
lithosphere creep processes efficiently relax elastic stresses,so that there is a physical and conceptual differencebetween the elastic lithosphere and the thermal litho-sphere. The lithosphere below the upper elastic portionmust therefore be sufficiently soft to relax elastic stressesbut sufficiently rigid to remain a coherent part of thesurface plate.
The oceanic and continental lithosphere differ in theirstrength (Fig. 1.3). The strongest part of the oceanic lithosphere occurs in the mantle between 20 and 60 kmdepth, below which it becomes increasingly ductile. Thecontinental lithosphere, however, appears to be markedlyzoned rheologically. In particular, the upper seismicallyactive brittle zone overlies a generally aseismic zone thatmay deform by ductile processes. This mid-lower crustalductile zone has been invoked as a level of detachmentof major upper crustal faults (e.g., Kusznir and Park1987) (§3.5.2 and §3.5.3). There is a second, deeperstrong layer in the mantle part of the continental litho-sphere where earthquakes occasionally occur (Chen andMolnar 1983).
There are also heterogeneities in the mantle part ofthe lithosphere, although they are small compared withthe crust. Seismological studies of western Europe (Hirn1976) suggest a highly stratified lithosphere beneath theMoho (Fig. 1.1). In particular, a “channel” of reduced Pwave velocities has been interpreted between 10 and 20 km below the Moho. This 10 km thick layer cannot beexplained in terms of partial melting since the solidustemperature is far in excess of the actual temperature –the hydration (serpentinization) of peridotites has beenpostulated as a possible mechanism. Whatever the cause,this upper low velocity channel may serve as a zone ofdecoupling of the upper lithosphere from the lowerportion of the lithosphere when acted upon by tangen-tial tectonic forces. There are few examples, however,where a process of decoupling can be unambiguouslydemonstrated at these levels.
1.2.2 Sublithospheric mantle
The underlying region, the asthenosphere is weaker than thelithosphere and is able to undergo deformation relativelyeasily by flow. The upper part of the asthenosphere isknown as the low velocity zone where P and S wave
BASINS IN THEIR PLATE TECTONIC ENVIRONMENT 7
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 7
8 CHAPTER 1
transmission speeds drop markedly, presumably due topartial melting (Fig. 1.4).
Studies of minute variations in the transmission speedsof seismic waves has allowed the structure of the deepmantle to be visualized and mapped (Dziewonski andWoodhouse 1987), a topic known as seismic tomography.Zones of faster than average seismic velocity are attrib-uted to propagation through denser rock which in turnis most likely due to a cooler temperature. Zones withslower than average seismic velocity are likewise thoughtto be due to warmer temperatures. Variations in tem-perature are probably caused by large-scale convection.Far from being inert, the mantle represents a vast volumeof rock which dynamically interacts with the lithosphere.Instabilities rise from the core–mantle boundary as plumes
of hot material which impinge on the base of the over-lying lithosphere and may have a major role in contin-
ental break-up (Burke and Dewey 1973; White andMcKenzie 1988). The thermal effects of the subductionof cold oceanic lithosphere and the insulating effects ofsupercontinental assemblies are also thought to be re-cognizable in the thermal structure of the mantle (Gurniset al. 1996).
1.3 PLATE MOTION
Plate tectonics can operate because the lithosphere iscomposed of a number of coherent rheological “plates”(Fig. 1.5). The underlying concepts of relative platemotion come from studies of focal mechanism solutionsof large earthquakes and observations of the distributionof earthquake epicenters, and from studies of magneticlineations in the ocean basins. The nature and rates of
Moho
Dep
th (
km)
Frictional sliding
Brittle-ductile transition
Plastic flow
(a) Oceanic lithosphere
Maximum rock strength
Plastic flow
Plastic flow
Frictional sliding
Brittle-ductile transition
Moho
Maximum rock strength
(b) Continental lithosphere
Olivine
Quartz
Brittlefailure50
100D
epth
(km
)
50
100
Fig. 1.3 Strength profiles for the oceanic (a) and continental (b) lithosphere, based on Molnar (1988) and Sammonds (1999). Theyield strength of the continental and oceanic lithosphere is plotted as a function of depth. The olivine rheology of the oceanic lithosphere provides a strong elastic core extending to depths of over 50 km. The quartz or quartz-felspar rheology of the contin-ental lithosphere causes a weak, ductile layer at equivalent depths. A second brittle–ductile transition occurs in the mantle litho-sphere because of the compositional change to an olivine rheology. The elastic lithosphere is the upper portion that is able to storeelastic stresses over long time periods. The base of the thermal lithosphere is a mechanical boundary separating the relatively strongouter shell of the lithosphere from the very weak asthenosphere.
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 8
relative plate motion (Minster and Jordan 1978) governmany aspects of the geodynamic environment of basins.Increasingly, reliable information on motion within platesis provided by measurement of geodetic strains involvingthe long-term occupation of triangulation networks andthe use of ground position satellite (GPS) technology(Clarke et al. 1998).
The global pattern of seismic activity is of continuousand narrow belts of high frequency of earthquakes,bounding extensive regions of relative stability(Barazangi and Dorman 1969). The narrow zones ofearthquake activity define plate margins. Oceanic plateboundaries are very sharply defined whilst continentalboundaries are rather more diffuse.
The fact that earthquake epicenters occur at depths asgreat at 650 to 700 km along some plate boundaries sug-gests that a process exists that is capable of transferringbrittle material to depths normally associated with
deformation by flow. This process of plate subduction is responsible for both the relative youth of the oceaniccrust and the distribution of earthquake epicenters. Thefact that the interiors of plates experience only infrequentearthquake activity reflects the concentration of large relative motions of plates along their boundaries. How-ever, this does not mean that the interiors of plates donot experience significant deformation. Continentalplates clearly undergo extensive deformation a long wayfrom plate boundaries (England 1987). In such cases, thedriving force is believed to be the excess potential energyof elevated continental crust.
The lithospheric plates can be easily deformed bybending about a horizontal axis, but are highly resistantto torsion about steeply inclined axes. This latter prop-erty of strength allows the motion of plates over theEarth’s surface to be modeled assuming no internaldeformation, except at plate boundaries. But how do theoceanic and continental lithosphere compare in terms offlexural strength? Different views exist on this problem.On the one hand, oceanic plates are stronger becausethey consist of more mafic mineral assemblages, whereasthe continents contain quartz which shows ductile flowat lower temperatures than olivine (see Fig. 1.3). Theyalso contain fewer intrinsic weaknesses such as old fun-damental fault systems. On the other hand, the oceanicplates are thinner and hotter, and therefore bend moreeasily under an applied force system. Whether continen-tal or oceanic lithosphere is stronger in terms of theirresistance to bending, or flexure, is therefore controver-sial and the strength must at least in part depend onparameters such as geothermal gradient and strain rate.Continental crust, however, appears to be weaker thanoceanic crust when subjected to extensional stresses(Steckler and ten Brink 1986).
Three classes of plate boundary exist: divergent, con-vergent, and conservative (Fig. 1.6):
Divergent boundaries are typified by the mid-ocean ridgespreading centres of the ocean basins. Here, the recog-nition of magnetic bands correlated with a magneticreversal chronology (Vine and Matthews 1963; Cox1973) allows the rate of divergent plate motion to be esti-mated. Transform faults with strike–slip displacementoffset the divergent boundaries, producing a highly seg-mented pattern.
Convergent boundaries are of two classes:• Subduction boundaries where oceanic lithosphere
constitutes the downgoing plate. Ocean–ocean
BASINS IN THEIR PLATE TECTONIC ENVIRONMENT 9
Temperature °C0 500
200
400
600
800
1000
1000 1500 2000 2500
Low velocity zone Partialmelting
Adiabat
Tm Solidus melting temperature formantle material
Geotherm
Dep
th (
km)
Fig. 1.4 Variation of temperature with depth, or geotherm,and the solidus temperature for mantle material (peridotite).Where the solidus curve (Tm) and the geotherm become tan-gential, partial melting in the mantle is likely to take place,resulting in a zone of low seismic wave velocities (low velocityzone).
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 9
PAC
IFIC
PLA
TE
EURA
SIA
NPL
ATE
NA
ZC
APL
ATE
PHIL
IPPI
NE
PLAT
E
Kuril
Tren
ch
Ryuk
u
Trench
Tong
aTr
ench
Kerm
adec
Tren
ch
Sout
heas
tIn
dian
Ridg
e
Macquarie
Trench
Paci
fic–A
ntar
ctic
Ridg
e
CO
CO
SPL
ATE
CA
RIBB
EAN
PLAT
E
Mid
dle
Am
eric
aTr
ench
Peru– Chile Trench
SCO
TIA
PLAT
E
Chi
le R
ise
East
er Is
land
Junc
tion
AN
TARC
TIC
PLA
TE
Bouv
etTr
iple
Junc
tion
Sout
hwes
t In
dian
Rid
ge
AFR
ICA
N P
LATE
Mid
-Atla
ntic
Ridge
Nor
thSe
a
Reykjanes Ridge
Red Sea
Sheb
a Ri
dge
EURA
SIA
N P
LATE
Kola
Peni
nsul
a
Ale
utia
nTr
ench
JUA
N D
EFU
CA
PLAT
E
Men
doci
noTr
iple
Junc
tion
Gal
apag
osTr
iple
Junc
tion EastPacificRise
Mariana Tre
nch
Java
Tren
ch IND
IAN
PLAT
E
New Hebrides
Trench
NO
RTH
AM
ERIC
AN
PLAT
EA
zore
sTr
iple
Junc
tion
Owen Fracture Zone
Carlsb
erg
Ridge
Indi
anO
cean
Trip
leJu
nctio
n
Central IndianRidge
Southeast Indian
R
idge
ARA
BIA
NPL
ATE
SOU
THA
MER
ICA
NPL
ATE
..
..
.
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
.
..
..
..
..
.
..
..
.
..
..
..
..
...
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
. ..
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
..
.. ..
.. .
.. .
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
.
..... ....
.... ....
..... ....
.... ....
.... ....
... ....
... ....
.. ....
....
..
...
..
.
.
.
Fig
. 1.5
The
lith
osph
eric
pla
tes,
show
ing
mid
-oce
an r
idge
s,tr
ench
es,a
nd t
rans
form
bou
ndar
ies
(Le
Pich
on e
t al
.197
3) a
nd a
bsol
ute
mot
ion
vect
ors
from
Min
ster
and
Jor
dan
(197
8).L
engt
h of
arro
ws
is p
ropo
rtio
nal t
o th
e pl
ate
spee
d.T
he f
aste
st p
late
mot
ion
is in
the
wes
tern
Pac
ific
and
Indi
an O
cean
s,w
here
as A
fric
a,A
ntar
ctic
a,an
d E
uras
ia a
real
mos
t st
atio
nary
with
res
pect
to
the
man
tle r
efer
ence
fram
e.R
epro
duce
d co
urte
sy o
fA
mer
ican
Geo
phys
ical
Uni
on.
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 10
boundaries, as for example, in the Mariana Islands, arecharacterized by a well-developed ocean trench andvolcanic island arcs, whereas ocean–continent bound-aries such as along the west of the Andes consist of anocean trench with an associated continental magmaticarc with intense plutonic activity.
• Collisional boundaries where continental lithosphereconstitutes the downgoing plate. Where both plates arecontinental, as in the Alps or Himalayan zones, thebuoyancy of the downgoing plate resists subduction,leading to intense and widespread deformation. Lesscommonly, oceanic lithosphere may override conti-nental lithosphere attached to subducting oceanic lithosphere, as in Taiwan.
Conservative boundaries occur where the adjoining plates aremoving parallel to each other and are therefore domi-nated by strike–slip or transform faults.
The relative movement between plates causes earthquakes, a fact demonstrated by the concentration of seismic activity along plate boundaries. Earthquakesoccur along trenches, ridges, and transforms, but they are distinctly different along the three types ofboundary:• Ridges are characterized by small to moderate earth-
quakes generated at shallow depths of <10 km;• transforms experience larger earthquakes originating
from depths of <20 km;
• subduction zones are sites of very large and deep earth-quakes, with foci occurring as deep as 700 km.
The disappearance of earthquakes at relatively shallowlevels along transforms and ridges is thought to be dueto the change in rheology from brittle (capable of storingelastic stresses before rupture) to ductile (flowing bycreep). This transition takes place in the range 600–900 °C, which corresponds to a depth of 20–30 km attransforms, but at shallower levels of about 10 km atridges where temperatures are elevated. In contrast,at subduction zones, if the plate is descending quickly itremains cool relative to its surroundings and is capableof brittle deformation to large depths. Hence, earthquakefoci along subduction zones (Fig. 1.7) may be very deep.The rate of slab subduction may affect the depth ofearthquakes, however. If the slab is only slowly sub-ducted, it may heat up sufficiently to prevent the occur-rence of earthquakes at great depths.
It is possible to study the type of motion that occurredduring a particular earthquake and to work out thestresses released at the time of the earthquake, andthereby the direction of plate motion that gave rise to thestresses. These methods are called first motion or focal
mechanism studies, since it is the first motion of the groundsurface, whether it is up/away from the source of theearthquake or down/towards the focus. Distinct radia-tion patterns result from first motion on strike–slip,normal, and reverse faults.
BASINS IN THEIR PLATE TECTONIC ENVIRONMENT 11
Mesosphere
Asthenosphere
Lithosphere Lithosphere
Transform
Ridge Subductionzone
Divergentplate boundary
Conservativeplate boundary
Convergentplate boundary
Fig. 1.6 The three types of plate boundary: convergent, divergent, and conservative (after Kearey and Vine 1996). Reproducedcourtesy of Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 11
12 CHAPTER 1
Sykes (1967) studied the first motion of earthquakesalong mid-Atlantic ridge transforms and suggested thatthe motion was strike–slip, to the east on the northernblocks and to the west on the southern blocks. This isright lateral motion – opposite to that indicated by theoffsets of the ridge – but the correct relative movementto support the plate tectonic interpretations of trans-forms as actively shearing only between the ridge seg-ments and not beyond. The earthquakes originating fromspreading centres are quite different from those beingproduced at transforms. First motion studies suggest thatfaults in the mid-ocean ridge are dip–slip and exten-sional. The situation at trenches is more complex. Firstmotion studies of earthquakes along the Benioff Zone
show that faulting takes place at roughly 45 ° to theinclined surface of the downgoing slab. At depths ofgreater than about 300 km, the focal mechanisms arecompressional, but at shallower depths they are tensional.This pattern supports the view that in the lowermost partof the subducting slab, the plate experiences compressionas it is forced into a zone of greater viscosity or strengthat depth. The upper part, however, is in a state of tensionbecause of the gravitational body forces on the cool plate“hanging” from its upper edge. This force constitutesslab-pull. Isacks et al. (1969) provide a detailed analysisof the use of seismological studies at sites of subduction.
The relative motion of plates with constructive, con-servative, and destructive plate margins creates a contin-
ually changing picture of continental splitting, oceanbasin creation, ocean closure, and continental collision.This cycle of plate motion involving the birth and closureof oceans is termed the Wilson cycle since it is based onearly ideas of the opening and closing of the Atlanticocean by John Tuzo Wilson (Wilson 1966) (Fig. 1.8).Many sedimentary basins can be fitted into a particularphase of the Wilson cycle.
1.4 CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS
Ideally, classifications are theories about the basis ofnatural order rather than dull catalogues compiled onlyto avoid chaos (Gould 1989, p.98, quoted in Ingersoll andBusby 1995, p.2). In this sense, classification schemes for sedimentary basins should both reveal something ofthe underlying mechanisms for basin development andreflect the natural variability of the real world.
Recent classification schemes of sedimentary basinsbased on plate tectonics have much in common. Theirlineage derives from Dickinson’s influential work in 1974which emphasized the position of the basin in relation tothe type of lithospheric substratum, the proximity of thebasin to a plate margin, and the type of plate boundarynearest to the basin (divergent, convergent, transform)(Fig. 1.9). The evolution of a basin could then be
NCKK, IB
M
P TNZ
CA, ALTNH NHKER IB NC
All others
100 km0
P
NC
TCA
NH
KK
ALT,ALK
M
IB
ALK0
100
200
300
Dep
th k
m
KERNZ
Fig. 1.7 Distribution of earthquake foci along Benioff zones, after Isacks and Barazangi (1977). NH, New Hebrides; CA, CentralAmerica; ALT, Aleutians; ALK, Alaska; M, Marianas; IB, Izu-Bonin; KER, Kermadec; NZ, New Zealand; T, Tonga; KK, Kuril-Kamchatka; NC, North Chile; P, Peru.
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 12
BASINS IN THEIR PLATE TECTONIC ENVIRONMENT 13
THE WILSON CYCLE
(a)
(b)
(c)
(f)
(e)
(d)Continental rift
New ocean crustin proto-oceanic
trough
Oceanic trench
Initiation ofsubduction
Closing of ocean basin
Subduction of ridge
Retroarc basinIntracontinentalstrike–slip faults
Fold–thrust beltand foreland basin
Continental collision andsubduction of continental lithosphere
Oceanic abyssal plain
Ocean basin withmid-ocean ridge
Passive continentalmargin
Stretchedcontinental
margin
Seafloorspreading
centre
Convergent margin withaccretionary prism
Forearc basins
Fig. 1.8 The Wilson cycle of ocean formation and ocean closure. Continental extension (a) is followed by the creation of a newoceanic spreading centre (b) and ocean enlargement (c). Subduction of ocean floor (d) leads to closure of the ocean basin. Subduc-tion of the oceanic ridge (e) takes place before continent–continent collision ( f ).
explained by changing plate settings and interactions.Dickinson (1974) recognized five major basin types onthis basis: (i) Oceanic basins, (ii) rifted continentalmargins, (iii) arc–trench systems, (iv) suture belts, and (v)intracontinental basins.
Strike–slip or transform related basins were conspicu-ously missing as a distinct basin type in this classification,a deficiency corrected in Reading (1982). Bally (1975)and Bally and Snelson (1980) differentiated three differ-
ent families of sedimentary basins based on their loca-tion in relation to megasutures, which in this context canbe defined to include all the products of orogenic andigneous activity associated with predominantly compres-sional deformation. The boundaries of megasutures areoften associated with subduction, whether it be of slabsof oceanic lithosphere (Benioff or B-type subduction) orof relatively buoyant continental lithosphere (Amferer orA-type subduction) and may also be the sites of impor-
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 13
14 CHAPTER 1
tant wrench tectonism along transform faults. Ingersolland Busby (1995) developed the classifications ofDickinson (1974) and Ingersoll (1988) to recognize 26 different types grouped into classes of divergent settings,intraplate settings, convergent settings, transform set-tings, and hybrid settings.
Industry-based classifications are typified by thescheme suggested by Halbouty et al. (1970) and laterdeveloped by Fischer (1975) and Klemme (1980).Klemme’s scheme recognizes eight main types of basinbased on their architectural characteristics such as lin-earity, asymmetry, cross-sectional geometry, which arethemselves related to the tectonic setting and basin evo-
lution. The goal of categorizing a sedimentary basin andthereby gaining some predictive insights into frontierbasins is common to industry classifications such as those of Huff (1978) and Klemme (1980). It is pursuedby an Exxon group (Kingston et al. 1983a, b) to theextent of devising a formula for each basin, thereby facil-itating easy comparisons between basins and providingan “instant” idea of hydrocarbon potential. This classification system (Fig. 1.10) once again places basinsprimarily in their plate tectonic setting (lithospheric sub-strate, type of plate motion, and location on plate),reminiscent of Dickinson’s analysis over a decade earlier,and categorizes a basin according to three critical factors:
Intracratonic sagsand coldspot basins
Oceanic abyssal plains
Intracontinental pull-aparts
Continental rifts
Failed rifts(aulacogens)
Convergence DivergenceStrike –Slip or Neutral
Con
tinen
tal c
rust
Oce
anic
cru
stTr
ansi
tiona
l
Peripheral and retroarcforeland basins
Oceanic rifts
Backarc basins
Forearc basins
Thrust-sheet-topbasins (piggy-backbasins)
Intra-arc/intermontanebasins
Oceanic trench
Passive margins
Trench-slope basins
Plate margins
Plate interiors
Oceanic moats(surrounding seamounts)
Interplate continentaltransform-related basins
Interplate oceanictransform-related basins
TYPE OF PLATE MOTION
TYPE
OF
LITH
OSP
HER
IC S
UBS
TRAT
E
Fig. 1.9 Classification of basins using the type of lithospheric substrate, type of plate motion, and location with respect to the plateboundary.
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 14
Typ
e o
f li
tho
sph
eric
su
bst
rate
?
Con
tinen
tal
Oce
anic
Typ
e o
f p
late
mo
tio
n?
Typ
e o
f p
late
mo
tio
n?
Div
erge
ntD
iver
gent
Con
verg
ent
Con
verg
ent
Po
siti
on
rel
ativ
e to
pla
te b
ou
nd
ary?
Po
siti
on
rel
ativ
e to
pla
te b
ou
nd
ary?
Inte
rior
Mar
gin
Con
tinen
tal
inte
rior
sag
Con
tinen
tal
inte
rior
frac
ture
Con
tinen
tal
mar
gin
sag
Con
tinen
tal
wre
nch
Tren
chas
soci
ated
Oce
anic
tren
chO
cean
icw
renc
hO
cean
icfr
actu
reO
cean
icsa
g
Inte
rior
Adja
cent
to
subd
uctio
nm
argi
n
Mar
gin
Mar
gin
Inte
rior
Fig
. 1.1
0B
asin
cla
ssifi
catio
n sc
hem
e ba
sed
on K
ings
ton
et a
l.(1
983a
,b).
Not
all
basi
n ty
pes
appe
ar in
thi
s sc
hem
e.M
ost
nota
bly,
fore
land
bas
ins
are
mis
sing
.
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 15
16 CHAPTER 1
the basin-forming tectonics, the depositional sequencesfilling the basin, and the basin-modifying tectonics.
1.4.1 Basin-forming mechanisms
Although the classifications outlined above undoubtedlyhave their uses, particularly in predicting source pres-ence, reservoir quality, availability of traps, etc., they havethe effect of scrambling some of the essential differencesand similarities between basins from the point of view oflithospheric mechanisms. Ingersoll and Busby (1995) rec-ognized six subsidence mechanisms, operating to differ-ent degree in their 26 basin types (Table 1.1), which canbe summarized as:• Crustal thinning, such as caused primarily by stretch-
ing or surface erosion;• lithospheric thickening, such as caused by cooling fol-
lowing stretching or accretion of melts derived fromthe asthenosphere;
• sedimentary and volcanic loading causing isostaticcompensation;
• tectonic (supracrustal) loading causing isostatic compensation;
• subcrustal loading caused by subcrustal dense loadssuch as obducted mantle flakes or crustal densificationdue to phase changes;
• asthenospheric flow primarily due to the subduction ofcold lithospheric slabs.
From the point of view of fundamental lithosphericprocesses, the major mechanisms for regional subsidenceand uplift (isostatic, flexural, and dynamic) can be summar-ized as follows (Fig. 1.11):
Isostatic consequences of changes in crustal and litho-spheric thickness; the thickness changes may be broughtabout purely thermally by cooling of lithosphere, forexample where new oceanic lithosphere moves awayfrom spreading centres. Thickness changes causing thin-
ning may be caused by mechanical stretching, subaerialerosion or at depth by delamination or the removal(stoping) of a deep lithospheric root. Mechanical thicken-
ing of crust and lithosphere, as in zones of continentalconvergence, generally causes isostatic uplift. Thickeningof the lithosphere by cooling, however, causes subsidence.
Loading and unloading at the surface and in the subsur-face, including the far-field effects of in-plane stresses;loading of the lithosphere may take place on a small scalein the form of volcanoes or seamount chains, and on a
large scale in the form of mountain belts, causing flexure
and therefore subsidence. The sediment infilling a basinalso acts as a sedimentary load, amplifying the primarydriving mechanism.
Dynamic effects of asthenospheric flow, mantle convec-tion, and plumes; subsidence or uplift are caused by the buoyancy effects of changes in temperature in themantle. Since these temperature changes are transmittedby viscous flow, the surface elevation changes may betermed dynamic.
For a given basin type, some or all of the mechanismsgiven above may have a major or minor role. Conse-quently, rather than attempting an encyclopedic cover-age of all basin types, we focus on the main lithosphericprocesses in Part 2 of this book. After an introductorychapter on the fundamentals of lithospheric mechanics(Chapter 2), basin forming processes are considered byinvestigating basins primarily caused by lithosphericstretching (Chapter 3) and basins primarily caused byflexure (Chapter 4). Chapter 5 discusses the role ofmantle–lithosphere interactions in basin development.Basins related to strike–slip deformation are consideredin Chapter 6.
Basins formed by stretching or thinning of the contin-ental lithosphere fall within an evolutionary sequence(Kinsman 1975; Veevers 1981). The early stages of thesequence correspond to the development of intracratonicrifts often associated with crustal doming. Such rifts mayevolve into oceanic spreading centres or may be abortedto form failed rifts or aulacogens. With seafloor creationand drifting of the continental edge away from thespreading centre, passive margin basins develop. Thesequence has been termed the rift-drift suite of sedimen-tary basins. The mechanisms of interest within this evo-lutionary sequence are therefore primarily the thermaland mechanical behavior of the lithosphere undertension, and the thermal contraction of the lithospherefollowing stretching.
Basins formed by flexure fall into two groups. Flexureof oceanic lithosphere as it approaches subduction zonesis responsible for the formation of deep oceanic trenches.It was the investigation of the deflection of the oceaniclithosphere at arc–trench boundaries that provided muchof the framework for the general theory of lithosphericflexure. Flexure of the continental lithosphere in contin-ental collision zones gives rise to foreland basins. Theforce system that causes flexure can be varied. In the caseof ocean trenches, it is probably a combination of gravi-tational body forces on the downgoing oceanic slab and
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 16
Table 1.1 Basin classification adapted from Ingersoll and Busby (1995), modified from Dickinson (1974, 1976) and Ingersoll(1988), with modern and ancient examples.
Relative Basin type Basin description Modern Ancient exampleplate examplemovement
Divergent Terrestrial rift Rifts in continental crust, commonly Rio Grande Keeweenawansettings valleys with bimodal volcanism Baikal (Precambrian)
Rhine-Bresse Karoo (Jurassic)Graben Viking and Central
Grabens (Mesozoic)Proto-oceanic Incipient ocean basins floored by Red Sea East Greenland
rift troughs new oceanic crust, flanked by Gulf of California (Jurassic)young rifted continental margins
Intraplate Continental Mature rifted intraplate continental East coast, USA Early Paleozoic ofsettings rises and margins at continental–oceanic USA and Canadian
terraces boundary CordilleraContinental Progradation of sedimentary wedges Mississippi, Gulf Early Paleozoic
embankments at edge of rifted continental Coast, USA Meguma terrane,margins Canadian
Appalachians (?)Intracratonic Broad cratonic basins, commonly Chad Basin Paleozoic Michigan
basins with underlying rifts (Cenozoic) BasinCongo Basin Illinois Basin
Williston Basin (USA)Continental Stable cratons with thin, extensive Barents Sea Middle Paleozoic,
platforms sedimentary cover North AmericanMidcontinent
Active ocean Basins floored by oceanic crust at Pacific Ocean Various ophiolite-basins active divergent plate boundaries bearing complexes
(Semail, Oman),NeoproterozoicArabian Shield
Oceanic islands, Sedimentary aprons and platforms Emperor–Hawaii Mesozoic Snowaseismic ridges in intra-oceanic settings seamounts Mountain Volcanicand plateaus Complex
(Franciscan, California)
Dormant ocean Basins floored by oceanic crust, Gulf of Mexico Phanerozoic Tarimbasins neither spreading nor subducting Basin (China)
Convergent Trenches Deep troughs formed by subduction Chile Trench Cretaceous, Shumaginsettings of oceanic lithosphere Island (Alaska)
Trench–slope Structurally confined basins on Central America Cretaceous Cambriabasins subduction complexes Trench slab (California)
Forearc basins Basins within arc–trench gaps Sumatra Cretaceous GreatValley (California)
Intra-arc basins Basins along arc platform, including Lago de Early Jurassic, Sierrasuperimposed and overlapping Nicaragua Nevada (California)volcanoes
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 17
Table 1.1 Continued
Relative Basin type Basin description Modern Ancient exampleplate examplemovement
Backarc basins Oceanic basins behind intra-oceanic Marianas Jurassic Josephinemagmatic arcs, and continental ophiolite (California)basins behind continental margin magmatic arcs without foreland fold–thrust belts
Retroarc Foreland basins on continental sides Andes foothills Cretaceous Sevierforeland basins of continental margin arc–trench foreland (Wyoming-
systems Utah)Remnant ocean Shrinking ocean basins between Bay of Bengal Pennsylvanian-
basins colliding continental margins Permian Ouachitaand/or arc–trench systems Basin(eventually subducted or deformed)
Peripheral Foreland basins superimposed on Persian Gulf Tertiary North Alpineforeland basins rifted continental margins during Indo-Gangetic Foreland Basin
continental collision Plain (Switzerland)Po Basin (Italy)
Piggy-back Basins carried above moving thrust Peshawar Basin Neogene, Apennines(thrust sheet sheets (Pakistan) (Italy)top) basins Meso-Hellenic Trough
(Greece)Foreland Basins formed among basement Sierras Laramide basins
intermontane cored uplifts in foreland settings Pampeanas (USA)basins (broken (Argentina)forelands)
Transform Transtensional Basins formed by local extension Salton Sea, Carboniferoussettings basins along strike–slip fault systems California Magdalen Basin (Gulf
of St Lawrence)Transpressional Basins formed by local compression Santa Barbara Miocene Ridge Basin
basins along strike–slip fault systems Basin (California)(California)
Transrotational Basins formed by rotation of crustal Western Aleutian Miocene Los Angelesbasins blocks about vertical axes within forearc Basin, California
strike–slip fault systems
Hybrid Intracontinental Basins on continental crust Qaidam Basin Pennsylvanian-settings wrench basins associated with strike–slip (China) Permian Taos Trough
tectonics caused by distant (New Mexico)collisional processes
Aulacogens Former failed rifts reactivated during Mississippi Paleozoic Anadarkoconvergent tectonics Embayment Basin (Oklahoma)
Impactogens Rift basins caused by stresses Baikal Rift Rhine Graben (Europe)transmitted from convergent plate (Siberia)margin
Successor Basins in intermontane settings Southern Basin Paleogene Sustut Basinbasins following cessation of orogenic and Range (British Columbia)
activity (Arizona)
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 18
the excess in mass of the magmatic arc. In the case offoreland basins it is a combination of topographic loadsrepresented by the mountain belt, lateral density varia-tions of lithospheric material (caused, for example, byprior stretching of the continental lithosphere in theoverridden plate or by obduction of dense mantle flakes)and horizontal “in-plane” forces set up by the shallow“end-on” collision of buoyant continental lithosphere.
Processes within the mantle have an important role inbasin development. Mantle plumes originating at thecore–mantle boundary impinge on the base of the litho-sphere and spread out laterally over a length scale of103 km. They are instrumental in continental splittingand the formation of new ocean basins, and have a major
role in igneous underplating and isostatic regional uplift.Present day hotspots over plumes or ascending limbs ofmantle convection systems are characterized by topo-graphic doming and commonly rifting. Basins locatedover downward limbs of convection systems, cold-spot
basins, appear to be broad, gentle sags. The onset ofsubduction of cold oceanic slabs at ocean–continentboundaries causes far-field tilting of the continental platetowards its margin and therefore has a potentially majoreffect in forearc, intra-arc, and retroarc settings. In addi-tion, it is believed that supercontinental assemblies in thegeological past have experienced very long wavelengthtopographic doming caused by elevated sublithospherictemperatures generated by an overlying insulating lid.
BASINS IN THEIR PLATE TECTONIC ENVIRONMENT 19
Foreland basins
Rifts
Postrift andpassivemargins
Flexural
Lithosphericthicknesschanges(stretching)
Lithospheric cooling
Dynamic (mantle)
Supracrustal, sub-crustal, end loads,and torques
Dynamic topography
Isostatic response to crustal thinning;brittle fault displacements
Induced convection
Thermal contraction/re-equilibration of lithosphere
Sediment loads
Isostatic
Crustal flakes, push-up ranges
Mantle involvementin local stretching
Pull-aparts inPrincipal
Displacement Zone
Strike–slip basins
Fig. 1.11 Fundamental mechanisms of basin formation: flexural, isostatic, and dynamic. The importance of these mechanisms inforeland, rift, postrift and passive margin, and strike–slip basins is indicated by the size of the boxes.
ABA1 11/22/04 4:31 PM Page 19
SUMMARY
A knowledge of the behavior of the lithosphere is essen-tial if we are to understand the initiation and develop-ment of sedimentary basins. Lithospheric processes are responsible for the highly dynamic nature of the tectonic processes near the surface of the Earth. TheEarth’s outer layer or lithosphere can be regarded as athermal boundary layer between the cool atmosphere oroceans and the hot interior. The lithosphere is thereforea thermal entity but it also has a physical significance.The upper half of the lithosphere is sufficiently rigid that it is able to store and transmit stresses. Because the deformations caused by applied forces are generallyrecoverable, this outer zone is known as the elastic lithosphere.
Applied forces of whatever origin cause stresses whichresult in deformation or strain. The simplest view ofapplied forces is of those due simply to the weight of anoverlying rock column, known as lithostatic stress. The difference between the actual stress and the lithostaticstress is a tectonic contribution known as deviatoric stress.Deviatoric stresses can be either tensile or compressive.
In an elastic solid there is a clear relationship betweenthe stresses and resultant strains. The exact relationshipdepends on material properties known as Young’smodulus and Poisson’s ratio. Where only one of the prin-cipal axes is nonzero, a uniaxial state of stress is said tooccur and the relation between stress and strain is calledHooke’s law. If there are two nonzero components ofprincipal stress, we have the condition termed plane stress.In an analogous fashion, uniaxial strain and plane strain
refer to the coordinate system of principal strains. In astate of stress where all the principal stresses are equal,an isotropic state of stress, the fractional volume change
caused by isotropic compression is given by the bulk
modulus or its reciprocal, the compressibility.The lithosphere is able to bend. The shape of the
flexure of the lithosphere depends on its rigidity and thenature of the applied force or load causing the bending.Bending is accompanied by longitudinal stresses andbending moments in the plate. The bending moment isrelated to the local radius of curvature by a coefficientcalled flexural rigidity.
Whereas the upper 15–50km of the Earth is thoughtto behave more or less elastically over geological timescales, rocks below this level deform with a creep-likebehavior and thus relax stresses.
In order to understand the mechanical behavior ofthe Earth it is necessary to understand its thermal struc-ture, since this determines its rheology. In the lithosphere,heat transfer is predominantly by conduction, whereas inthe mantle convection is extremely important. Convec-tion is the natural result of differential heating above a critical Rayleigh number and estimates for Earth’smantle strongly suggest that convection must be takingplace. A thermal boundary layer develops along theupper surface of the convecting fluid because heat is lostby conduction to the surface. This cool boundary layer,the lithosphere, detaches and sinks due to gravitationalinstability along subduction zones. For conduction, theheat flux is related to the temperature gradient by a coefficient, the thermal conductivity. Heat fluxes in the continents are determined primarily by conduction from radioisotopic heat sources, whereas in the oceansthey reflect cooling of newly created oceanic lithosphere.The variation of temperature with depth is known as the geotherm. Measurements of continental heat flowsindicate a linear relationship between radiogenic heatgeneration and surface heat flow, with the intercept
C H A P T E R
2 The physical state of the lithosphere
The kindly Earth shall slumber, lapt in universal law
(ALFRED LORD TENNYSON, IN MEMORIAM (1850))
ABA2 11/22/04 4:34 PM Page 20