BASIC VALUATION FOR AUTO COMPANY INC - iBusiness value · Financial Statements ..... 4 Adjusted...
Transcript of BASIC VALUATION FOR AUTO COMPANY INC - iBusiness value · Financial Statements ..... 4 Adjusted...
BASIC VALUATION
FOR
AUTO COMPANY, INC.
i
© 2011 iBusiness Value
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. i
Letter of Opinion............................................................................................................. 1
Purpose of the Assignment ..................................................................................... 1
Function of the Assignment .................................................................................... 1
Date of Value .......................................................................................................... 1
Standard of Value ................................................................................................... 2
Conclusion of Fair Market Value ........................................................................... 2
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 3
Company Description ............................................................................................. 3
Products and Services ............................................................................................. 3
Customer Base ........................................................................................................ 3
Competition............................................................................................................. 3
Company Outlook ................................................................................................... 3
Financial Statements ....................................................................................................... 4
Adjusted Balance Sheet .......................................................................................... 4
Adjusted Income Statement .................................................................................... 5
Ratio Analysis ................................................................................................................. 6
Valuation Methodology .................................................................................................. 7
Net Cash Flow/Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method .......................................... 7
Market Method........................................................................................................ 8
Historical Cost/Book Value Method ....................................................................... 8
Discounts......................................................................................................................... 9
Minority Interest Discounts .................................................................................... 9
Lack of Marketability Discount ............................................................................ 10
Value Summary ............................................................................................................ 11
Scedule 1 ....................................................................................................................... 12
Schedule 1A .................................................................................................................. 13
Schedule 1B .................................................................................................................. 14
Schedule 1C .................................................................................................................. 16
Schedule 1D .................................................................................................................. 17
Schedule 1E .................................................................................................................. 18
Schedule 1F ................................................................................................................... 19
Schedule 1G .................................................................................................................. 20
Schedule 2 ..................................................................................................................... 21
Schedule 3 ..................................................................................................................... 22
Schedule 4 ..................................................................................................................... 23
Sources of Information ................................................................................................. 24
Certification and Contigent and Limiting Conditions .................................................. 25
1
© 2011 iBusiness Value
10/3/2002
Mr. Robert Fong
President
Auto Company, Inc.
368 South Tustin Avenue
Tustin, California 91604-2226
Re: Basic Valuation Valuation of Auto Company, Inc. for Mr. Robert Fong’s
41.66% minority common stock interest.
Dear Mr. Fong,
Per your request, iBusiness Value (“IBV”) has performed a “Basic Valuation” valuation
of Auto Company, Inc. (“Auto” or the “Company”) for Mr. Robert Fong (“Mr. Fong” or
the “Client”). A “Basic Valuation” is not a full appraisal or full valuation, but an
estimate of fair market value given very limited information. The “Basic Valuation” does
not include an extensive detailed financial analysis, company analysis or industry
analysis. The “Basic Valuation” is intended solely for internal informational use by the
Company or Client and is not intended for other purposes such as IRS tax issues, tender
offer for securities or for any other purpose other than for internal information for Mr.
Fong or any individual within the Company, any third party legal counsel with whom Mr.
Fong wishes to share the “Basic Valuation”.
PURPOSE OF ASSIGNMENT
The purpose of IBV’s assignment is to determine an estimated “Basic Valuation” fair
market value of the Company’s operations as of June 30, 2001.
FUNCTION OF THE ASSIGNMENT
The function of this “Basic Valuation” valuation is to provide information for Mr. Robert
Fong regarding the approximate fair market value of Mr. Fong’s 41.66% minority interest
in the Company’s common stock.
DATE OF VALUE
The date of value utilized herein is June 30, 2001.
2
© 2011 iBusiness Value
STANDARD OF VALUE
IBV considered the following definitions of Fair Market Value, Going Concern Value
and Goodwill:
Fair Market Value: The amount at which an arm’s-length transaction
would be expected to occur between normally motivated investors under
open market conditions, without considering any special benefits for any
particular buyer or seller.
Going Concern Value: 1. The value of an enterprise, or an interest
therein, as going concern. 2. Intangible elements of value in a business
enterprise resulting from factors such as: having a trained work force; an
operational plant; and the necessary licenses, systems and procedures in
place.
Goodwill: The intangible asset which arises as result of name, reputation,
customer patronage, location, products and similar factors that have not
been separately identified and/or valued but which generate economic
benefits.
CONCLUSION OF FAIR MARKET VALUE
As of the date of value, June 30, 2001, based upon the initial results of our research,
analysis and methods, the fair market value range for Mr. Fong’s 41.66% minority
interest in the Company’s common stock is as follows:
Fair Market Value Range: $900,000 to $1,400,000
The schedules that follow include an explanation of our research and analyses. Also
attached is list of information used in reaching our opinion. This initial valuation is
subject to the enclosed “Certification and Contingent and Limiting Conditions.”
Respectfully submitted,
Mr. Ryan W. Fong, CFA
Chief Executive Officer
iBusiness Value Enclosures
3
© 2011 iBusiness Value
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Company Description Auto Company, Inc. is an online auto parts retailer based out of Tustin, California. The
company provides auto parts for a wide market including the high-performance market
and traditional replacement part market.
Products and Services The company’s product line covers after-market high-performance brand, after-market
replacement part brand and original manufacturer dealer parts for all automobiles sold
and driven in the United States. It competes nationwide and not just locally in Tustin,
California.
Customer Base The company’s customer base includes car enthusiasts who modify their cars, auto
mechanics, and everyday people who are looking for discount after-market parts.
Competition The competition includes brick and mortar auto supply stores such as O’Rielly Auto
Parts, Pep Boys, Auto Zone and other independent stores. Online retailers are the direct
competition as they are online and have the ability to compete on cost with Auto
Company, Inc. because of their low overhead. Auto Dealers also compete, but aren’t as
competitive because they charge large premiums for parts. Auto mechanics and their
direct parts suppliers also compete with the company.
Company Outlook The company expects to continue as a going-concern business supplying auto parts to the
same market it is currently marketing too. It plans to reinvest cash flow and grow the
company’s market share. The company is entering into some exclusive contracts with
Chinese manufacturers of after-market performance parts which will give them the power
to compete on quality, proprietary manufacturing design and cost.
4
© 2011 iBusiness Value
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Below are your company’s historical and adjusted financial statements with adjustments.
The adjustments are made to present the financial statements as they would be if the
company was a public company. This is done so that the statements are comparable to
public companies for analysis of accounts and ratios associated with the financial
statements.
Adjusted Balance Sheet
Historical Adjustments Adjusted Historical Adjustments Adjusted Historical Adjustments Adjusted
Assets:
Current Assets 680,424 799,983 1,480,408 1,169,999 890,800 2,060,799 1,040,518 1,389,348 2,429,866
Other Assets 250 - 250 23,750 - 23,750 8,115 - 8,115
Intangible Assets - - - - - - - - -
Fixed Assets 471,141 - 471,141 460,221 - 460,221 1,582,739 - 1,582,739
Total Assets 1,151,816$ 799,983$ 1,951,799$ 1,653,970$ 890,800$ 2,544,770$ 2,631,372$ 1,389,348$ 4,020,720$
Edit Check (Should Equal 0) - - - - - - - - -
Liabilities:
Current Liabilities 404,010 - 404,010 745,429 (13,472) 731,957 1,031,721 (30,052) 1,001,668
Other Liabilities - - - - - - - - -
Noncurrent Liabilities 264,637 - 264,637 290,956 - 290,956 821,784 - 821,784
Total Liabilities 668,647 - 668,647 1,036,384 (13,472) 1,022,913 1,853,504 (30,052) 1,823,452
Stockholders' Equity 483,169 799,983 1,283,152 617,586 904,272 1,521,858 777,868 1,419,401 2,197,268
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity 1,151,816$ 799,983$ 1,951,799$ 1,653,970$ 890,800$ 2,544,770$ 2,631,372$ 1,389,348$ 4,020,720$
Edit Check (Should Equal 0) - - - - - - - - -
1999 2000 2001
5
© 2011 iBusiness Value
Adjusted Income Statement
Historical Adjustments 1999 Adjusted Historical Adjustments 2000 Adjusted Historical Adjustments 2001 Adjusted
Revenues 6,612,970$ -$ 6,612,970$ 8,686,124$ -$ 8,686,124$ 9,370,100$ -$ 9,370,100$
Cost of Goods Sold:
Cost of Goods Sold 5,164,538 - 5,164,538 6,914,780 - 6,914,780 7,418,852 - 7,418,852
Total Cost of Goods Sold 5,164,538 - 5,164,538 6,914,780 - 6,914,780 7,418,852 - 7,418,852
Gross Profit 1,448,432 - 1,448,432 1,771,344 - 1,771,344 1,951,247 - 1,951,247
Operating Expenses:
Operating Expenses 1,154,677 - 1,154,677 1,493,494 - 1,493,494 1,543,678 - 1,543,678
Robert Fong's Salary and perquisites - (100,000) (100,000) - (112,540) (112,540) - (101,340) (101,340)
Steven Fong's Excess Compensation - (125,000) (125,000) - (125,000) (125,000) - (125,000) (125,000)
Total Operating Expenses 1,154,677 (225,000) 929,677 1,493,494 (237,540) 1,255,954 1,543,678 (226,340) 1,317,338
Operating Profit 293,755 225,000 518,755 277,850 237,540 515,390 407,569 226,340 633,909
Interest 37,497 - 37,497 30,142 - 30,142 86,301 - 86,301
Depreciation 36,434 - 36,434 20,705 - 20,705 57,618 - 57,618
Amortization - - - - - - 614 - 614
Other Income - - - - - - - - -
Other Expenses - - - - - - - - -
Income before Taxes 219,824 225,000 444,824 227,003 237,540 464,543 263,036 226,340 489,376
Provision for Income Taxes 81,814 84,652 166,466 92,586 96,665 189,251 102,754 88,942 191,696
Extraordinary Items:
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
Total Extraordinary Items - - - - - - - - -
Net Income 138,010$ 140,348$ 278,358$ 134,417$ 140,875$ 275,292$ 160,282$ 137,398$ 297,680$
Additions to Net Income:
Robert Fong's Salary and perquisites 100,000 112,540 101,340
Steven Fong's Excess Compensation 125,000 125,000 125,000
Total Additions to Net Income 225,000 237,540 226,340
Effective Tax Rate 37.6% 40.7% 39.3%
Taxes on Additions to Net Income 84,652 96,665 88,942
Adjustments to Net Income 140,348 140,875 137,398
Extraordinary Item Adjustments - - -
Adjusted Net Income 278,358$ 275,292$ 297,680$
Edit Check (Should Equal 0) - - -
Net Income 138,010 134,417 160,282
Interest 37,497 30,142 86,301
Taxes 81,814 92,586 102,754
Taxes on Additions to Net Income 84,652 96,665 88,942
Adjustments to Net Income 140,348 140,875 137,398
Extraordinary Item Adjustments - - -
Adjusted EBIT 482,321$ 494,685$ 575,677$
Edit Check (Should Equal 0) - - -
1999 2000 2001
6
© 2011 iBusiness Value
RATIO ANALYSIS
Below is a ratio analysis of the company’s financial information. The industry SIC code
that the company is being compared to is 5531 Auto and Home Supply Stores. The
differences highlighted in green indicate good attributes of the company and differences
highlighted in red indicate bad attributes of the company. Differences highlighted in
orange can be both good and bad depending on the other attributes of the company.
Ratio AnalysisCompany Historical RMA Difference
Current Ratio 1.01 1.70 (0.69)
Quick Ratio 0.27 0.30 (0.03)
Sales/Receivables 32.59 348.10 (315.51)
Days in Receivables 11.20 1.05 10.15
Cost of Sales/Inventory 10.22 2.40 7.82
Days in Inventory 35.72 152.08 (116.36)
Cost of Sales/Payables 8.95 7.50 1.45
Days in Payables 40.79 48.67 (7.88)
Sales/Working Capital 1,065.10 7.70 1,057.40
EBIT/Interest 4.05 3.00 1.05
Fixed/Worth 2.03 0.30 1.73
Debt/Worth 2.38 2.00 0.38
% Profit Before Taxes/Tangible Net Worth 33.82% 12.70% 21.12%
% Profit Before Taxes/Total Assets 10.00% 3.60% 6.40%
Sales/Net Fixed Assets 5.92 30.10 (24.18)
Sales/Total Assets 3.56 2.30 1.26
% Depreciation, Depletion Amortization/Sales 0.62% 60.00% -59.38%
2001 Officers', Directors', Owners'
Compensation 426,340$ 187,402$ 238,938$
% Officers', Directors', Owners' Comp/Sales 4.55% 2.00% 2.55%
Gross Profit 20.82% 35.30% -14.48%
Operating Profit 3.73% 2.70% 1.03%
All Other Expenses (net) 0.92% 0.40% 0.52%
Profit Before Taxes 1.10% 2.30% -1.20% Note: RMA is the Risk Management Association’s 2001 Annual Statement Studies Financial Ratio Benchmarks for SIC
Code 5531 Auto and Home Supply Stores.
7
© 2011 iBusiness Value
VALUATION METHODOLOGY
The valuation methodologies used in this analysis are the Market Method and Net Cash
Flow Method, also known as the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method.
Net Cash Flow/Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method
The net cash flow method uses the cash flow after reinvestment into operating net
working capital, other net operating assets, and capital expenditures that are required to
keep the firm in operations and to fuel growth of future cash flows. This net cash flow
measurement is the theoretical amount of cash the company can pay out in dividends and
is a controlling interest cash flow. It is a controlling interest cash flow because a
minority interest shareholder will not have control over whether this cash flow is paid out
in total to shareholders. (See Schedules 1, 1A, 1B)
The net cash flows are discounted using a discount rate that is a blended rate of the cost
of various forms of financing used to finance the company. The discount rate uses the
build-up method and weighted-average-cost-of-capital method to derive a discount rate.
The build-up method starts out with estimating betas of stock returns of comparable
public companies in the Company’s SIC codes SIC codes 5013 and 5531 to derive a cost
of capital. Then various company specific discount rate premiums are added for risks
such as the small company effect, local competition, and the local economy. This in
combination with the 10-year treasury yield (Risk-Free Rate) and the premium the stock
market returns over the risk free rate is used to estimate an adjusted cost of equity. The
estimated after-tax cost of debt and the estimated cost of preferred equity are all
incorporated into the final discount rate using the weight-average-cost-of-capital
(WACC), to derive a blended rate. The weights used are estimated market values of each
form of financing (equity and interest-bearing debt) the company uses. (See Schedule 1C)
We have included an EVA® (Economic Value Added), also known as economic profit,
reconciliation to DCF. EVA® represents the profit (Net Operating Profit Less Adjusted
Taxes or NOPLAT) earned above that which is required for an investor to invest in this
line of business given the risk of this line of business. The profit required to invest in the
business is represented by the WACC times the operating invested capital. The present
value of the EVA® is equal to Market Value Added which when added to the operating
invested capital as of the date of the valuation equals the DCF value. The Market Value
Added is an approximation of the value of the company’s goodwill. Goodwill is all the
value a company has over and above its operating invested capital. (See Schedule 1D)
The Return on Invested Capital is a performance measurement of management and the
company’s performance. The EVA® measurements can be a performance measurement
of the value the company creates for each period. (See Schedule 1D)
8
© 2011 iBusiness Value
Also included are sensitivity analysis tables and charts for you to understand how your
tax rate, discount rate and terminal growth rate (assumed growth rate of the free cash
flows at the end of the forecast for all future periods going forward) affect the value of
your firm. The assumed terminal growth rate is 5% as this is the average nominal growth
rate in GDP. (See Schedule 1E, Schedule 1F and Schedule 1G)
Market Method
The market method uses the price paid in an acquisition of a public or private company
(transaction method), or a public common equity value, as a multiple of net income, book
value, sales or some other financial statement item. Only comparable company
transactions in the Company’s SIC codes 5013 and 5531 were used.
Multiples that use the price paid in an acquisition of a public or private firm give a
controlling interest multiple, as we use only transactions that are for a 100% interest in
the firm being purchased.
Public peer group common equity multiples provide minority interest multiples, as public
common equity shareholders hold only a minority (non-controlling) interest. The market
methods we have used in this “Basic Valuation” are the transaction method and the
public peer group common equity multiple method. (See Schedules 2 and 3)
Historical Cost/Book Value Method
The historical cost, or book value method, takes the equity book value from the balance
sheet and adjusts its value to the appropriate amount. Book value is a controlling
marketable value. The book value method however is not a going concern value. It is a
value that shows what the value of the equity is if we were to sell all the assets off at
historical cost and pay down all forms of financing other than equity. It is used here to
show that it is an inferior measure of value to the market and net cash flow/discounted
cash flow methods for a going concern value. (See Schedule 4)
9
© 2011 iBusiness Value
DISCOUNTS
The following discounts were applied in reaching our opinion:
Minority Interest Discounts
Controlling interest public equity transactions have typically shown a premium over the
purchased firm’s market equity value. The control premiums from the Houlihan, Lokey,
Howard & Zukin 2001 Mergerstat Review are presented below:
Control Premiums
Year Average Premium
All Companies
Median Premium
All Companies
Median Premium
Purchase Price -
$25 million or less
1996 36.6% 27.3% 32.2%
1997 35.7% 27.5% 36.9%
1998 40.7% 30.1% 39.8%
1999 43.3% 34.6% 35.5%
2000 49.2% 41.1% 42.9%
Average 41.1% 32.1% 37.5%
Median 40.7% 30.1% 36.9%
Source: Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin 2001 Mergerstat Review
The premium can be used to calculate an implied discount for lack of control using the
formula below.
Minority Interest Discount = 1 – (1/(1+Control Premium))
As the value represented by the DCF method and historical cost/book value methods
represents a controlling interest, we must apply a discount for lack of control to obtain a
minority interest value. The appropriate control premium to value the Company is the
36.9% median of the median premium purchase price for transactions with a purchase
price of $25 million or less. The implied minority interest discount is 26.95%. (See
Schedule 4)
10
© 2011 iBusiness Value
Lack of Marketability Discount
The Company does not trade in an established market and the Company’s shares are not
available for open public trade. As a result, consideration must be given for a discount for
lack of marketability. The discount for lack of marketability discount of 33.45% was
selected as follows:
Discount for Lack of Marketability
Restricted Stock Studies Discount
SEC 32.60%
Gelman 33.00%
Trout 33.45%
Moroney 0.00%
Maher 34.73%
Standard Research Concultants Study 45.00%
Willamette Managemnt Associates Study 31.20%
Silber Study 33.75%
FMV Opionions, Inc., Study 23.00%
Average 29.64%
Median 33.00%
Pre IPO Private Transaction Studies
Robert W. Baird & Company Studies 46.00%
Willamette Management Assoicates Studies 51.41%
Average 48.70%
Median 48.70%
Average of All Studies 33.10%
Median of All Studies 33.45%
11
© 2011 iBusiness Value
VALUE SUMMARY
Below is a summary of the results of the value methods herein.
Value Summary
Value Summary
DCF Value of Minority Interest 1,088,114$
Book Value of Minority Interest June 30, 2001 444,987$
Peer Group Comparable Values:
Price/Sales 1,688,593$
Price/Earnings 1,043,843$
Price/Cash Flow 738,500$
Comparable Transactions Values:
Price/Sales 778,022$
Price/EBIT 1,483,152$
Price/EBITDA 1,661,134$
Average 1,211,622$
Median 1,088,114$
Min 738,500$
Max 1,688,593$
Estimated Value of Equity Interest 1,200,000$
12
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SCHEDULE 1
Historical
Year 1999 2000 2001
Revenues 6,612,970 8,686,124 9,370,100
%Growth 31.3% 7.9%
Expenses 6,474,960 8,551,707 9,209,818
Net Income 138,010 2.1% 134,417 1.5% 160,282 1.7%
Interest 37,497 30,142 86,301
Taxes 81,814 92,586 102,754
Adjustments to EBIT:
Robert Fong's Salary and perquisites 100,000 112,540 101,340
Steven Fong's Excess Compensation 125,000 125,000 125,000
Adjusted EBIT 482,321 7.3% 494,685 5.7% 575,677 6.1%
Plus Amortization - - 614
Adjusted EBITA 482,321 7.3% 494,685 5.7% 576,291 6.2%
Estimated Cash Taxes @ 40.0% of Adjusted EBITA 192,928 197,874 230,516
NOPLAT 289,393 296,811 345,775
Plus Depreciation 36,434 20,705 57,618
Estimated Gross Cash Flow 325,827 4.9% 317,516 3.7% 403,393 4.3%
Less Change in Operating Net Working Capital 196,640 176,848
Less Change in Net Other Assets 23,500 (15,635)
Estimated Adjusted Cash Flow From Operations 97,376 1.1% 242,179 2.6%
Less Capital Expenditures 9,785 1,180,135
Free Cash Flow to the Firm 87,591 (937,956)
13
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SCHEDULE 1A
DCF Forecast
Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Revenues 12,957,922 16,845,299 19,372,094 21,309,303 22,374,768
%Growth 38.3% 30.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0%
EBIT 987,002 1,280,243 1,472,279 1,619,507 1,700,482
EBIT Margin 7.6% 7.6% 7.6% 7.6% 7.6%
Plus Amortization 1,604 738 738 738 738
EBITA 988,606 1,280,981 1,473,017 1,620,245 1,701,220
Estimated Cash Taxes @ 40.0% of Adjusted EBITA 395,442 512,392 589,207 648,098 680,488
NOPLAT 593,164 768,588 883,810 972,147 1,020,732
Plus Depreciation 57,618 57,618 57,618 57,618 57,618
Estimated Gross Cash Flow 650,782 826,206 941,428 1,029,765 1,078,350
Gross Cash Flow Margin 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Less Change in Operating Net Working Capital 513,347 522,743 381,896 292,787 161,033
Less Change in Net Other Assets 2,251 3,110 2,021 1,550 852
Estimated Adjusted Cash Flow From Operations 135,183 300,353 557,510 735,428 916,465
Less Capital Expenditures 57,618 57,618 57,618 57,618 57,618
Terminal Value
Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) 77,565 242,735 499,892 677,810 858,847 10,300,809
Discount Rate 13.8%
Date of Value June 30, 2001
Present Value Discount Factor 0.879086 0.772792 0.679350 0.597207 0.524996 0.524996
Present Value of FCFF As of June 30, 2001 68,186 187,584 339,602 404,793 450,891 5,407,885
Firm Value As of June 30, 2001 6,858,941
Edit Check (Should Equal 0) -
Estimated Outstanding Interest Bearing Debt As of June 30, 2002 1,486,021
Estimated Outstanding Preferred Equity As of June 30, 2002 -
Equity Value 5,372,921
% of Ownership 41.66%
Value of Equity Interest Before Discounts 2,238,359
Minority Interest Discount % 26.95%
Discount 603,327
Value of Minority Interest 1,635,032
Discount for Lack of Marketability % 33.45%
Discount 546,918
Value of Equity Interest 1,088,114$
14
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SCHEDULE 1B
15
© 2011 iBusiness Value
16
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SCHEDULE 1C
Discount Rate Analysis
Capital Structure
Estimated Market Value of Common Equity 1,232,207$
Estimated Market Value of Debt 903,471$
Estimated Market Value of Preferred -$
Total Value 2,135,678$
Discount Rate Calculation
Risk Free Rate (10-Year Treasury Rate) 3.00%
Market Risk Premium 6.00%
Industry Beta 1.20
Estimated Market Cost of Common Equity 10.20%
Small Company Premium 5.00%
Adjusted Estimated Market Cost of Common Equity 15.20%
Local Competition 1.00%
Local Economic Risk 5.00%
Final Adjusted Estimated Market Cost of Equity 21.20%
Common Equity Weight 0.58
Estimated Cost of Debt 6.00%
After Tax Cost of Debt @ 40% Tax Rate 3.60%
Debt Weight 0.42
Estimated Cost of Preferred Equity 9.00%
Preferred Equity Weight -
Estimated Discount Rate (WACC) 13.75%
17
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SCHEDULE 1D
EVA® / Economic Profit Check
EVA® Value
Historical Forecast
Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
NOPLAT 296,811 345,775 593,164 768,588 883,810 972,147 1,020,732
Operating Invested Capital 1,607,789 1,817,009 3,100,739 3,616,338 4,142,191 4,526,109 4,820,446 4,982,332
ROIC 18.5% 19.0% 19.1% 21.3% 21.3% 21.5% 21.2%
Discount Rate 13.8% 13.8% 13.8% 13.8% 13.8% 13.8% 13.8%
Difference (EVA®/Economic Profit Percentage) 4.7% 5.3% 5.4% 7.5% 7.6% 7.7% 7.4%
Operating Invested Capital 1,607,789 1,817,009 3,100,739 3,616,338 4,142,191 4,526,109 4,820,446 4,982,332 Terminal Value
Required Return 221,144 249,921 426,493 497,411 569,740 622,546 663,031
EVA® 75,667 95,853 166,671 271,177 314,071 349,601 357,702 5,318,477
% Growth in EVA® 26.7% 73.9% 62.7% 15.8% 11.3% 2.3%
Discount Rate 13.8% Edit Check - - - - - - -
Present Value Discount Factor 0.87909 0.77279 0.67935 0.59721 0.52500 0.52500
PV EVA® As of June 30, 2001 146,518 209,564 213,364 208,784 187,792 2,792,180
Market Value Added (Goodwill Value) 3,758,202$
Operating Invested Capital as of June 30, 2001 3,100,739$
Firm Value As of June 30, 2001 6,858,941$
Edit Check (Should Equal 0) -$
18
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SCHEDULE 1E
Discounted Cash Flow Equity Value vs. Tax Rate vs. Discount Rate Sensitivity Analysis
Discount Rate
Tax Rate 7.8% 10.8% 13.8% 16.8% 19.8%
20% 6,656,094$ 2,889,557$ 1,713,186$ 1,142,982$ 808,646$
30% 5,639,237$ 2,408,673$ 1,400,650$ 912,668$ 626,979$
40% 4,622,381$ 1,927,789$ 1,088,114$ 682,354$ 445,312$
50% 3,605,524$ 1,446,905$ 775,578$ 452,040$ 263,645$
60% 2,588,667$ 966,021$ 463,042$ 221,726$ 81,978$
19
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SCHEDULE 1F
Discounted Cash Flow Equity Value vs. Growth Rate vs. Discount Rate Sensitivity Analysis
Discount Rate
Growth Rate 7.8% 10.8% 13.8% 16.8% 19.8%
3.0% 2,652,193$ 1,409,710$ 867,461$ 566,566$ 376,892$
4.0% 3,374,913$ 1,630,399$ 966,477$ 619,921$ 408,930$
5.0% 4,622,381$ 1,927,789$ 1,088,114$ 682,354$ 445,312$
6.0% 7,291,830$ 2,350,276$ 1,241,122$ 756,397$ 486,983$
7.0% 17,036,908$ 2,997,815$ 1,439,435$ 845,622$ 535,189$
20
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SCHEDULE 1G
Discounted Cash Flow Equity Value vs. Growth Rate vs. Tax Rate Sensitivity Analysis
Tax Rate
Growth Rate 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
3.0% 1,405,119$ 1,136,290$ 867,461$ 598,633$ 329,804$
4.0% 1,543,361$ 1,254,919$ 966,477$ 678,035$ 389,593$
5.0% 1,713,186$ 1,400,650$ 1,088,114$ 775,578$ 463,042$
6.0% 1,926,810$ 1,583,966$ 1,241,122$ 898,278$ 555,434$
7.0% 2,203,688$ 1,821,562$ 1,439,435$ 1,057,309$ 675,182$
21
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SCHEDULE 2
Peer Group
Comparables Min Max Average Median Input Base Value
% of
Ownership
Minority Interest
Discounts
Minority
Interest
Value
Lack of
Marketability
Discount
Indicated
Value
Price/Sales 0.29 1.56 0.80 0.65 0.65 9,370,100 6,090,565 41.66% 0.00% 2,537,329 33.45% 1,688,593
Price/Earnings 17.17 66.42 31.57 23.49 23.49 160,282 3,765,024 41.66% 0.00% 1,568,509 33.45% 1,043,843
Price/Cash Flow 6.11 21.99 14.43 12.19 12.19 218,514 2,663,686 41.66% 0.00% 1,109,691 33.45% 738,500
22
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SCHEDULE 3
Comparable
Transactions Min Max Average Median Input Base Value
% of
Ownership
Minority
Interest
Discounts
Minority
Interest
Value
Lack of
Marketability
Discount
Indicated
Value
Price/Sales 0.08 1.73 0.59 0.41 0.41 9,370,100 3,841,741 41.66% 26.95% 1,169,079 33.45% 778,022
Price/EBIT 0.87 40.71 9.03 7.42 7.42 987,002 7,323,554 41.66% 26.95% 2,228,629 33.45% 1,483,152
Price/EBITDA 1.31 19.35 7.85 7.84 7.84 1,046,224 8,202,395 41.66% 26.95% 2,496,068 33.45% 1,661,134
23
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SCHEDULE 4
Book Value
Book Value June 30, 2001 777,868$
% of Ownership 41.66%
Book Value of Interest Before Discounts 324,060$
Minority Interest Discount % 26.95%
Discount 87,347$
Book Value of Minority Interest 236,713$
Discount for Lack of Marketability % 33.45%
Discount 79,180$
Book Value of Equity Interest 157,532$
24
© 2011 iBusiness Value
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
1. Auto Company, Inc. externally compiled financial statements for the years ending
June 30, 1999 through 2001 and an internal six-month statement ending December
31, 2001.
2. Conversations and correspondence with Mr. Robert Fong, President of Auto
Company, Inc.
3. Company information obtained from Auto Company, Inc. website (www.Auto.com).
4. SIC Code information obtained from Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987
and from the Occupational Safety & Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
5. Public company research from the Wall Street Research Net and Yahoo! Finance.
6. AICPA Practice Aid Series, Assets Acquired in a Business Combination to be Used
in Research and Development Activities: A Focus on Software, Electronic Devices,
and Pharmaceutical Industries, AICPA.
7. Copeland, Tom. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. New
York, NY: Wiley, 1996.
8. Damodaran, Aswath. Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining
the Value of Any Asset. New York, NY: Wiley, 1996. 192 – 197.
9. Fowler, Bradley A. “How Do You Handle It?” Business Valuation Review,
December 1993: 189.
10. Plummer, James L. QED on Venture Capital Financial Analysis. QED Research, Inc.
Palo Alto, CA: 1987.
11. Pratt, Shannon P., Robert F. Reilly and Robert P. Schweihs. Valuing a Business: The
Analysis and Appraisal of Closely Held Companies 3rd
edition. New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill, 1996.
12. Scherlis, Daniel R., and William A. Sahlman, A Method for Valuing High-Risk, Long
Term, Investments: The Venture Capital Method. Boston, MA: Harvard Business
School Publishing: 1987.
13. Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin. 2001 Mergerstat Review.
14. Valuation data and research.
25
© 2011 iBusiness Value
CERTIFICATION AND CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. The function of this “Basic Valuation” valuation is to provide information for Mr.
Robert Fong regarding the approximate fair market value of Mr. Fong’s 41.66%
minority interest in the Company’s common stock as of June 30, 2001.
2. Factual data and statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct to the
best of IBV’s knowledge and belief. No factors affecting the conclusions have been
knowingly omitted. IBV does not maintain responsibility for any change in its
conclusions due to undisclosed information, information unavailable at the time of
writing, or changes in financial market conditions, industry outlook or Company-
specific events.
3. The analyses, opinions and conclusions in this report are limited only by our
assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, unbiased professional
analyses, opinions and conclusions.
4. Our compensation is not contingent on any resulting action or event from the
analyses, opinions, or conclusions in, or use of, this report.
5. The valuation and its conclusions are subject to review upon presentation of new data
that is not disclosed or unavailable as of the date of this report.
6. No person or persons other than those indicated below have provided significant
professional assistance regarding the production, analysis, opinion, or conclusions of
this “Basic Valuation”.
7. This report is not for the appraisal of real estate, but only for the valuation of the
Company’s operations.
8. The “Basic Valuation” should not be construed as a formal appraisal.
9. No responsibility can be attributed to the appraisers for the inability of the owners to
sell the interest valued in this report.
10. This report assumes that the Company and/or the client is in compliance with all legal
matters, including the assumption of good title with respect to the ownership interest
valued in this report.
11. All ownership information provided by the client is assumed to be correct.
12. Only liabilities or commitments against the Company’s assets indicated in the
furnished financial statements are considered in this report.
13. No expert witness testimony before a court or other government agency is included in
the fees of this report. Expert witness testimony may be provided at Mr. Fong’s
request, provided additional compensation arrangements are agreed upon by IBV and
Mr. Fong.
26
© 2011 iBusiness Value
14. This report shall not be made public or shared with any party, by any means, other
than Mr. Fong, his legal counsel, or IBV, unless previously specified. Dissemination
of this report to those restricted above is contingent upon the approval of IBV.
15. The date of value for this report is June 30, 2001. The use of a different date of value
could materially impact the opinions herein.
16. The receipt and acceptance of this report is subject to the foregoing contingent and
limiting conditions.
Date: October 3, 2002
Mr. Ryan W. Fong, CFA
Chief Executive Officer
iBusiness Value