Ballston Common Redevelopment › ... · Ballston Common Mall History • 1986 – Ballston Common...
Transcript of Ballston Common Redevelopment › ... · Ballston Common Mall History • 1986 – Ballston Common...
Ballston Common Redevelopment
June 16, 2015
• 1951 – 1986 Parkington Shopping Center Site History
Ballston Common Mall History • 1986 – Ballston Common Mall is developed
– 580,000 SF – Anchors
• Hecht’s • JC Penney
• 1999 Expansion – Regal Cinemas – 3 Restaurants – E-Trade Tower
• 2004 – Ballston Point
• 2006 – Ice Plex
The Need for Redevelopment • 29 Years old, suburban regional shopping mall with an inward-
focus • Steady decline in sales and occupancy • Major renovation required to attract new retailers – street
connectivity, visibility, accessibility from garage • Create an amenity that improves property values, attracts new
residents / employers and contributes to the overall vitality of the community
Redevelopment Vision • Complete transformation into a vibrant mixed-use district • Premier dining and entertainment destination • Unique retail shops and service providers • Highly experiential urban street and gathering place • Iconic and authentic architecture • Major improvements to the public parking garage • Significantly improved connectivity to the garage and Ice Plex
• 375,000 S.F. of Shopping, Dining, Service and Entertainment
• 400 Unit, 22 Story Residential Tower
• Open-air Pedestrian Shopping and Sidewalk Cafes
• Community Amenities Plaza
• $300 mm investment • $8 mm in incremental
sales, meals and real estate taxes annually
• $125 mm in net value to Arlington County over 30 years
• Major catalyst for Ballston
Why Now?
• Mall Vacancy, Tenant Expectations • Leasing Horizon, Market Competition • Stakeholder and Community Support • Unprecedented Opportunity
• Create Significant Value • Raise the Profile and Perception • Catalyst for Other Ballston Development
Challenges • Attracting the right tenants requires high
quality place-making and a major renovation
• Significant bonus density and height required
• Substantial public improvements, including major garage improvements
• Costly and complex phasing
• Critical timing window requires efficient yet comprehensive review and approval
The Need for
Partnership By November 2015: • Culminate a comprehensive, efficient review
process • Address required density, height and related
zoning considerations • Implement strategic public-private financing tools
that leverage significant value creation to meet the financial challenges of the redevelopment
• Facilitate the value creation