Baker v carr

9
Baker v Carr 1961 District Reapportionment you want politics? - messy, nasty, important politics?

Transcript of Baker v carr

Page 1: Baker v carr

Baker v Carr1961 District Reapportionment

you want politics? - messy, nasty, important politics?

Page 2: Baker v carr

How are constitutional districts determined?

Representative Bobby Scott- 3rd district

Representative Eric Cantor-

7th District

Page 3: Baker v carr

Baker v Carr 1961•Tennessee: Republican Baker

complained Tennessee legislature had not drawn “updated” districts since 1901•SC said this was not a political

decision so the courts could make a judgement.

•SC said, “one person one vote”

•almost every state had to redistrict b/c of this ruling and urban areas gained and rural lost.....how did that affect politics?

Page 4: Baker v carr

So What?States in the 1960s - trying to avoid desegregation - often “drew new districts” which did NOT reflect true populations. This deceptive district drawing is called gerrymanderingReynolds v Sims 1964SC said: legislative districts mustbe roughly equal in populations

Page 5: Baker v carr

Minority Majority Districts

•Now states often create minority majority districts - purposefully drawn to create districts that represent minorities who may not otherwise be fairly represented

Page 6: Baker v carr

How are constitutional districts determined?

Representative Bobby Scott- 3rd district

Page 7: Baker v carr

The Politics of It All

•Redrawing districts is very important. What happens if the lines shift?

Page 8: Baker v carr

The politics of it all...

Page 9: Baker v carr

Virginia Redistricting for Incumbent ProtectionYou need to know:1. Who draws the congressional district maps?state legislatures

2.How often do they redraw them?every 10 years - based on the census

3. Why is it so important?incumbents (the current HoR member) is everything. 98% re-election rate