Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in...

150
Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 Background Chapter: 4 Reference Number: 32 Title: Air Pollution Test of Woodville Lime and Chemical Company US EPA September 1974

Transcript of Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in...

Page 1: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

Background Report Reference

AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17

Background Chapter: 4

Reference Number: 32

Title: Air Pollution Test of Woodville Lime and Chemical Company

US EPA

September 1974

EPA
Text Box
Note: This is a reference cited in AP 42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I Stationary Point and Area Sources. AP42 is located on the EPA web site at www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ The file name refers to the reference number, the AP42 chapter and section. The file name "ref02_c01s02.pdf" would mean the reference is from AP42 chapter 1 section 2. The reference may be from a previous version of the section and no longer cited. The primary source should always be checked.
Page 2: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

. . . . . , ... .. . . -- .. : . , .. .. :

. . , , . ~ . . . . , . .. . . , . . . , _ _ . . ..:~,.. - .. :

Page 3: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 4: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

PEDCO- ENVIRONMENTAL SUITE13 - ATKINSON SQUARE

CINCINNATI. O H I O 4 5 2 4 6 513 /771-4330

EMISSION TESTING REPORT EPA REPORT 74-LIM-3-B

WOODVILLE LIME AND CHEMICAL CO. WOODVILLE, OHIO

Contract No. 68-02-0237 Task 26

Submitted by :

PEDCo-Environmental Specialists, Inc. 13 Atkinson Square

Cincinnati, Ohio 45246

f li c

Septeinber 16, 1974

Prepared by:

W. G. DeWees Richard W. Gerstle, P. E.

Page 5: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

11.

111.

IV . V.

VI.

VII.

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

n .

I.

J.

K.

L.

1. TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

PROCESS DESCRIPTION

LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS

PROCESS OPERATION L TEST CONDITIONS

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

PARTICULATE RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS

GASEOUS RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS

VISIBLE EMISSIONS RESULTS

OPERATING RESULTS

FIELD DATA

-

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION LOG

LABORATORY REPORT

SAMPLI / EMTHODS ’

TEST LOG

RELATED REPORTS

PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

SUMMARY OF TESTING COSTS

- - - ~ ... \

u

i

1

. 3

9

12

14

19

Page 6: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

11. INTRODUCTION

Under the Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended, the Environ-

mental Protection Agency is charged with the establishment of

performance standards for stationary sources which may contri-

bute significantly to air pollution. A performance standard is

based on the best emission reduction systems which have been

shown to be technically and economically feasible.

In order to set realistic performance standards, accurate

data on pollutant emissions must be gathered from the stationary

source category under consideration.

Woodville Lime and Chemical Co. in Woodville, Ohio, was

designated as a possible representative well-controlled

stationary source in the lime production industry and therefore

was selected for an emission testing program. The process under

investigation in this test series was operation of the No. 1 lime

kiln at the Woodville plant, from which emissions are controlled

by a cyclone in series with a Buell electrostatic precipitator.

Preliminary tests were performed during the week of May 20,

1974, to ascertain composition and velocity of the gas stream

and to observe visible emissions. ..

The emission test program was conducted from July 8 to 10,

1974, on three test runs. Sampling was done at the kiln stack to

determine concentrations of filterable and total particulate,

1

Page 7: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

oxides of nitrogen, and sulfur dioxide. Determinations of

moisture content and dry molecular weight were performed

simultaneously. Samples of the kiln feed, kiln product,

kiln fuel, and effluent dust from the ESP unit were collected

for calculation of a sulfur balance. In addition, visible

emissions were recorded by two certified observers during this

time. Because of difficulties with process.operation and

above-normal production rates, further tests were scheduled

for August 5, 1974. In the interim between test periods the

kiln was shut down, at which time the ESP was cleaned and

inspected.

. .

c

2

Page 8: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

111. SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Data on particulate emissions from the lime kiln are

summarized in Table 1. Emissions of filterable particulate,

as measured by the probe and filter catch, averaged 9.27

pounds per hour at a concentration of 0.041 grain per DSCF.

Total particulate emissions averaged 18.3 pounds per hour

at a concentration of 0.077 grain per DSCF. Emissions of

filterable particulate were higher in the first two tests

than in the third. This can probably be attributed to discon-

tinuity in process operations and to problems with control

equipment, described in Section IV, "Process Operation".

Because of these difficulties, the emissions data reported

in this report are considered questionable with respect to

being representative of a welr-controlled lime-producing

process . Data on oxides of nitrogen emissions are summarized

in Table 2. These data show an average concentration of

3 3 9 ppm by volume and an hourly emission rate of 67.7 pounds

per hour of NO2.

Data on sulfur dioxide emissions are summarized in Table

3 . These data show an average concentration of 4 4 . 5 ppm

by volume and an hourly emission rate of 12.0 pounds per

3

1

Page 9: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

Tab le 1. SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE 3ATA

4 R u n Number - _. Date

1

7 / 8 / 7 4

--

, Volume of Gas S a m p l e d , DSCFa 237.923

Average S t a c k Tempera tu re , OF 6 2 1

11.3

S tack V o l u m e t r i c Flow R a t e , DSCFMb 2 7 6 1 9

Stack V o l u m e t r i c Flow R a t e , ACFM' 6 4 3 9 3

I s o k i n e t i c 1 0 2 . 9

i

a ' 5 P e r c e n t Mois tu re by Volume, %

. : 'Unit P roduc t ion Rate, t o n / h r ma>+

P a r t i c u l a t e s - probe , bypass , and f i l t e r c a t c h

1c1

s tPr'DSCF g 2

* .II" gr/DSCF

l b / t o n @ P a r t i c u l a t e s - t o t a l

g g r / A c F

iiYt:n ai

Dry s t a n d a r d c u b i c f e e t a t 70°F Dry s t a n d a r d c u b i c f ee t per m i n A c t u a l c u b i c f e e t p e r minute .

7 8 1 . 1

0 . 0 5 1

0 .022

1 2 . 0

1 7 0 4 . 6

0.111

0 .047

26 .2 -

3 -

7/9 /74

2 3 9 . 6 4 2

6 6 9

1 2 . 1

2 7 3 9 0

6 7 2 9 6

1 0 4 . 5

- 5 A 3

7 /10 /7 4

24.8.641 242 .07

6 7 4 6 5 5

11 .4 1 1 . 6

2 8 6 5 8 2 7 8 8 9

7 0 3 3 0 6 7 3 4 0

1 0 3 . 6 1 4 0

718.9

0 .046

0.019

1 0 . 9

4 4 3 . 5

989.9

0 .064

0 .026

1 5 . 0

._

2 9 . 9 2 i n H g . :e a t 7ODF, 2 9 . 9 2 i n . H g .

417.0 6 3 9

0.026 0 . 0 4 1

0.011 0 . 0 1 i

6.4 9 .77

' 6 5 3 8 0

8 8 9 . 3 1 1 9 4 . 6

0.055 0 .077

0 .022 0.03;

13.6 1 8 . 3

7374+7

4

Page 10: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

Y

u

tu

w

U

4

N d

a

. . m C a u U y1 W U

O P m u n

P P

m u m u m

'' " m a m N O I

Y

al U m 4

0 .* U U m a

a

0, E .* u Y a m al E

.A m U R 0 m a cn X

N m m N

.c1 0 U U 01 u U 0 U

W U Y C .* E

5

Page 11: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

Table 3. SUMMARY OF SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

Test No.

Date, 1974

Flow rate, DSCFMa

Sample volume , D S C F ~ SO2 in sample, grams

SO emissions, lb/hr

SO2 concentration, ppm by volume

2

2 4 6 Avg . 7/8 7/9 7/10

27619 27390 28658

166.917 165.549 166.705

0.867 0.130 0.649

19.1 2.42 14.4 12.0

70.2 10.6 52.6 44.5

a) .Dry standard cubic feet at 7 0 ° F 29.92 in. Hg.

6

Page 12: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i.

1 c

r -

i

hour of sulfur dioxide.

Visual determination of the opacity of emissions from

the lime kiln exit stack was performed independently by two

PEDCo personnel. Data on opacity measurements are summarized

in Table 4 . The average opacity was less than 5 percent

in all tests. A period of high emissions occurred, however,

for about 1 minute in the first test, during which opacity

levels exceeded 20 percent. Failure of a field in the-electro-

static precipitator caused the discontinuity; with the result

that the opacity values are not considered typical of those

occuring with well-controlled lime-product.ion operations.

During sample recovery on test 1, the probe glass liner

tip was found to be broken. This test was therefore not

representative of true emissions. Because of the higher

than expected opacity and various process problems, this

test series was terminated before enough measurements were

obtained to provide representative results.

Page 13: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

a I n t e r v a l of Observa t i ons

b D u r a t i o n o f Observat ion, min

T o t a l No. o f ReadingsC

No. o f Readings Unobservable

No. of Readings @ 0% O p a c i t y

5 %

10%

15%

20%

.252

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Percent Readings Unobservable

Percen t Readings @ 0% O p a c i t y

5%

10%

15%

20% . .

Pe rcen t Readings Cxceediny 20%

- 1 - 3 5 7 / 8 / 7 4 7 / 9 / 7 4 7 / 1 0 / 7 4

Obs. 1 . Obs. 2 Obs. 1 Obs. 2 Obs. 1

S t a r t

.End

0.2 20.2

a 24-hour c l o c k s t a r t and end t i i i i cs

Obs. :,

8 3 8

1 2 3 9

212 .5

8 5 0

0

7 8 2

66

1

1

-_ ~ . .

- --- - -

.- - .

- - - - -- 0

92 .0

7.8

0 .1

0.1

.

-- -.

-- -. .

- . -

Excluditi! l t h e t i r i ic t h a t r e a d i n g s were n o t r c c o r d e d f o r p e r i o d o f o b s e r v a t i o n .

l tcadit igs r e c u r d e d nL: 15-second i n t c r v a l s ultlcss o t h e r v i s e noted.

b

C

Observer 1 - R . S . Arn ick Observer 2 - W. G. DeWees

8

Page 14: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

Lime tone onsis

IV. PROCESS DESCRIPTION

ing primarily of calcium c n t C mbina-

tions of calcium and magnesium carbonate with varying amounts of

impurities is quarried at the Woodville Plant. The limestone is

calcined or burned to form lime, commonly divided into two basic pro-

ducts--quicklime and hydrated lime. Calcination expels carbon

dioxide from the raw limestone, leaving calcium oxide (quicklime).

With the addition of water, calcium hydroxide (hydrated lime) is

formed.

The basic processes in production are: (1) quarrying the lime-

stone raw material, ( 2 ) preparing the limestone for kilns by crushing

and sizing, ( 3 ) calcining the limestone, and ( 4 ) optionally processing

the quicklime further by additional crushing and sizing followed by

hydration. The majority of lime is produced in rotary kilns which

can be fired by coal, oil, or gas. Rotary kilns have the advantage

of producing high production per man-hour and a more uniform product.

However, they do require higher capital investment and unit fuel

costs than most vertical kilns.

The Woodville Lime and Chemical plant has cwo rotary kilns

each equipped with a Buell electrostatic precipitator. The kilns

are almost identical. The feed for both is a dolomitic stone,

quarried on the site and fed in sizes ranging from 1 inch to

2 1/4 inches at a rate of about 700 tons per day. There is no

~

9

Page 15: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

p r e h e a t e r . Normally t h e k i l n i s f u e l e d w i t h a mix tu re of

9 5 p e r c e n t Number 6 f u e l o i l and 5 p e r c e n t n a t u r a l gas . Both

k i l n s have two h e a t t r a n s f e r s e c t i o n s , each 20 f e e t long . The

p r o d u c t , about 3 5 0 t o n s p e r day , i s cooled i n a N e i m s c o o l e r b e f o r e

s t o r a g e . There i s no p r o d u c t c r u s h i n g , b u t u n d e r s i z e m a t e r i a l -

i s s e p a r a t e d and r e t u r n e d t o t h e k i l n . The m a j o r i t y of t h e

p roduc t is used i n t h e s teel i n d u s t r y , most ly i n b a s i c oxygen

f u r n a c e s ; none of t h e p r o d u c t i s h y d r a t e d .

The e l e c t r o s t a t i c p r e c i p i t a t o r on k i l n Number 1 w a s p u t i n

o p e r a t i o n i n J u l y 1 9 7 1 . I n t h i s k i l n t h e main p r o c e s s f a n i s

l o c a t e d b e f o r e t h e ESP , w i t h a c y c l o n e b e f o r e t h e f a n t o reduce

f a n b l a d e e r o s i o n . The p r e c i p i t a t o r on k i l n Number 2 was p u t i n

o p e r a t i o n i n December 1973. The main p r o c e s s f a n is a f t e r t h e

ESP and t h e r e i s no cyc lone .

I n bo th sys tems t h e i n l e t g a s t o t h e p r e c i p i t a t o r s i s cooled

t o about 600°F w i t h a c o n h i n a t i o n of w a t e r i n j e c t i o n and/or

tempering a i r . Each p r e c i p i t a t o r has 2 8 , 8 0 0 s q u a r e f e e t o f

c o l l e c t i n g s u r f a c e a r e a , which i n c l u d e s one c e l l and two f i e l d s ;

des ign gas v e l o c i t y i s 1 . 5 f e e t p e r second and t r e a t m e n t t ime ,

10.0 8econds-

emissim t e s t showed e x i t l o a d i n g s o f less t h a n 0 . 0 0 5 g r a i n

p e r d r y s t a n d a r d c u b i c f o o t .

The p l a n t manager r e p o r t e d t h a t an e a r l i e r

A t p r e s e n t t h e d u s t c o l l e c t e d from t h e p r e c i p i t a t o r s is

d i sposed of i n t h e q u a r r y . I t i s expec ted t h a t i n t h e f u t u r e t h e

10

Page 16: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

dust will be granulated and used as a component of dry mix

fertilizers that are blended in another part of the complex.

At the time of the initial plant inspection (February 8,

1974) the precipitators were working satisfactorily and had

been very well maintained. The plant is representative of

modern design; raw materials and products.are typical of those

in the industry.

.

11

_.

Page 17: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i i b b V . LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS

F igu re 1 shows t h e sampl ing p o r t s and sampling p o i n t s used

i n t h e N o . 1 l ime k i l n e x i t s t a c k . The sampling p o r t s were

l o c a t e d i n a 63.5-inch i n s i d e - d i a m e t e r v e r t i c a l s t a c k , . 4 f e e t

( 0 . 7 5 d i a m e t e r ) from t h e s t a c k e x i t , and 1 2 f e e t ( 2 . 2 6 d i a m e t e r s )

from t h e n e a r e s t downstream d i s t u r b a n c e . I n o r d e r t o meet t h e

sampling r equ i r emen t s of Methods 1 and 5 of t h e F e d e r a l R e g i s t e r ,

V o l . 36, No. 2 4 7 , i t was n e c e s s a r y t o i n s t a l l a s t a c k e x t e n s i o n

on t h e ESP e x h a u s t o u t l e t . F o r t y - e i g h t t r a v e r s e p o i n t s ( 2 4

a long each of two p e r p e n d i c u l a r d i a m e t e r s ) were used a s d e s c r i b e d

i n t h e F e d e r a l R e g i s t e r Method 1. A d d i t i o n a l sampling p o i n t s i n

t h e e x i s t i n g s t a c k a t a lower s i t e were used f o r some of t h e gas

sampling.

b 1 I

1 2

Page 18: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

Edge 0 1 r o o f

6 3 . 5 " I.D.

24 24 i ) . . .. . . .. ..

.. . *...

w b s I -1

C R O S S S E C T I O N

~. ! . Sc o f loldiiig Al l Oimenrions in Fcr.1 A r c Approximale

SIDE V I E W

F i g u r e 1. T e s t S i t e - N o . 1 K i l n P r e c i p i t a t o r O u t l e t .

13

Page 19: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i b c

. c i II ci t t € t f b

E B

VI. PROCESS OPERATION & TEST CONDITIONS

Before the test series began, EPA engineers had decided

to conduct tests at the Woodville plant only during periods

in which opacity of visible emissions from the kiln stack

was in the range of 0 to 5 percent. This range had been

described as typical of opacities during operation of the

No. 1 kiln and was judged to be typical of those occurring

in a well-controlled lime-producing plant.

Although plant operations appeared to be normal and

preliminary readings indicated 0 to 5 percent opacity values,

several problems developed during the first day of testing,

July 8,1974. After about 3 hours of testing, PEDCO'S team

of opacity readers stopped the tests at 8:22 p.m. because

opacity values were exceeding.the 5 percent limit. Testing

was resumed at 8:27 p.m. and continued until 9:13 p.m.,

when the "A" field of the kiln's electrostatic precipitator

malfunctioned, probably because of overload. Sampling was

resumed at 9:16 p.m., when the opacity values again dropped

'to the 0 to 5 percent range. The first test was completed

at 9:29 p.m. ..

The second test was started on July 9 at 8:41 a.m.

Opacities of visible emissions ranged between 0 and 5 percent

14

Page 20: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i ' I

Y -i f d i i i c t f f # E ;fs B I i

throughout the entire test sequence. The test was completed

at 12:48 p.m., and because no problems were encountered

in sampling or process operation the emissions were considered

representative of those occurring normally.

After completion of the second test, plant operators

performed a routine cleaning operation, shutting down a

fan on the inlet to the ESP for removal of adhering dust.

The fan was not re-started after cleaning, however, an.d

opacity readings during the afternoon ranged between 10

and 15 percent. The third test, therefore, was not begun

until the following day.

Testing was resumed at 0 : 2 4 a.m. on July 10. Operations

appeared normal except for a heavy load in the kiln, as

evidenced by the ampere meter on the kiln-drive motor.

Opacity readings ranged from 0 to 5 percent. Sampling was

hampered, however, by blockage in the silica gel impinger,

which was replaced several times.

the opacity readers reported an increasing number of 5 percent

readings, with occasional 'puffs' as high as 10 percent.

Observations of the plume were difficult because of cloudy

skies. Test No. 3 was completed at 12:55 p.m.

As testing progressed,

Operating variables for the three test runs are summarized

in Table 5, and sulfur contents of the various 'process streams

are shown in Table 6.

A fourth test, intended to provide values to replace

those obtained in Test No. I, was started at 3:OO p.m. July

1 5

Page 21: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

Table 5 . SU.XMARY OF OPERATING VARIABLES

Date Pa r t i cu la t e T e s t N o .

S tone Feed Rate, t on /h ra

O i l R a t e , g a l / h r F i r i n g Zone Temp, O F

Mid K i l n , Temp, OF

Ki ln Feed End Temp, O F

Before ESP Temp, OF Stack Temp, OF

ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR DATA

"A" F i e l d

Primary c u r r e n t , amps

P r i m a r y v o l t a g e , v o l t s P r e c i p i t a t o r c u r r e n t , amps

"B" F i e l d

Primary c u r r e n t , amps

P r i m a r y v o l t a g e , vo l t s P r e c i p i t a t o r c u r r e n t , amps

7 /8 /74

1

3 2 2

2 6 2 0 - 2 6 5 0

1 4 6 0 - 1 4 6 5

1 0 2 0 - 1 0 4 0

6 8 3 - 7 0 0

6 6 0 - 6 7 5

7 /9 /74

3

3 5 6

2 6 0 0 - 2 6 5 0

1 4 5 0 - 1 4 7 5

1 0 0 0 - 1 0 3 5

6 8 5 - 7 0 0

6 6 0 - 6 9 0

7 / 1 0 / 7 4

5

3 7 5

2 5 9 0 - 2 6 2 0

1 4 7 0 - 1 5 2 0

1 0 5 0 - 1 0 8 0

7 0 0 - 7 2 5

6 7 0 - 7 0 0

3 9 - 5 0 37 -46 4 8 - 6 1

2 5 0 - 2 7 5 2 5 0 - 2 6 5 2 5 0 - 2 7 0

0 .20 -0 .30 0 . 1 9 - 0 . 2 3 0 . 2 0 - 0 . 3 2

4 1 - 5 5 50 -54 5 3 - 6 1

2 4 0 - 2 6 0 2 4 0 - 2 5 0 2 4 0 - 2 5 0

0 .27-0 .35 0 .28-0 .30 0 .32 -0 .37

a ) Obta ined by m u l t i p l y i n g i n d i c a t e d tonnage by (see Appendix D ) .

16 ~

Page 22: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i

ci .I e I i b CI 1 c P f c ci E i I I

1 T a b l e 6 . SULFUR CONTENT OF KILN, FUEL OIL, FEED ROCK, PRODUCT

AND EFFLUENT DUST.

Sample Date - #1 ESP C o l . Dus t #1 ESP C o l . Dus t #1 ESP C o l . Dust

# 2 ESP C o l . Dust # 2 ESP C o l . D u s t # 2 ESP C o l . D u s t #1 S t o n e F e e d #1 Rock Feed

#1 Rock F e e d .

#1 Rock Feed #2 Stone F e e d # 2 Rock Feed

# 2 Rock F e e d

# 2 K i l n P r o d u c t

#1 Lime P r o d u c t

#1 Lime P r o d u c t

#1 Lime Product # 2 Lime P r o d u c t

# 2 Lime P r o d u c t

#1 F u e l O i l

#1 F u e l O i l

# 2 F u e l O i l

# 2 Fuel O i l

# 2 F u e l O i l

#1 F u e l O i l

7/8/74 7/9/74

7/10/74 7/8/74 7/9/74

7/8/74 7/10/7,4

7/9/74 7/10/74 7/10/74 7/8/74 7/9/74

7/10/74 7/9/74 7/8/74 7/9/74

7/10/74 7/8/74

7/9/74 7/10/74

7/8/74 7/9/74

7/10/74 7/8/74

7/10/74

Time

1 8 3 0

1015 0800 2 0 3 0 1255 1 0 3 0 1750 1100 1700 1000 2036 1 2 3 0

1 3 0 0

1 3 0 0

1 7 2 0 0930 1000 2030

1230 0930 1900 1 2 3 0

1 2 3 0

2 0 3 0

1100

- S u l f u r Con ten t % by weight

0.9 1 . 3 2

1 . 2 8

0.78 1.16 1.64 0.02 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.14 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.07 0.04 0 . 0 2

0.06 0.07 1.75 2 . 2 6

1.7 - 0.875

3 . 2 2

2 . 2 6

17

I

Page 23: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i i f

. c 1 E 1 >.

1 0 . Except f o r t h e h e a v i l y loaded k i l n , p r o c e s s o p e r a t i o n s

appeared normal. Because o p a c i t y r e a d i n g s rose t o t h e 15

t o 20 p e r c e n t r a n g e , t e s t i n g w a s s topped a t 4:30 p . m . Cleanup

o p e r a t i o n s l a t e r r e v e a l e d t h a t t h e sampling p robe w a s broken.

The v a l u e s o b t a i n e d i n t h i s t e s t were t h e r e f o r e d i s c a r d e d ,

and f u r t h e r sampling w a s s chedu led f o r t h e f o l l o w i n g day .

On t h e morning of Ju ly 11, however, stack o p a c i t y v a l u e s

were a g a i n r a n g i n g between 5 and 1 0 p e r c e n t . Al though p l a n t

p e r s o n n e l t r ied s e v e r a l v a r i a t i o n s i n k i l n o p e r a t i o n , t h e

h igh o p a c i t y r e a d i n g s p e r s i s t e d th roughou t t h e day and even ing .

A r e a d i n g a t 10:30 p.m. gave v a l u e s between 20 and 25 p e r c e n t .

A t 6:OO a . m . on J u l y 12, o p a c i t y r e a d i n g s s t i l l ranged

between 5 and 1 0 p e r c e n t . P e r s o n n e l of t h e Woodville p l a n t ,

EPA, and PEDCo a g r e e d t h a t t h e k i l n shou ld be shutdown b r i e f l y

for i n s p e c t i o n . Examination o f t h e ESP r e v e a l e d t h a t s e v e r a l

charge p l a t e s were covered w i t h a b o u t 1 i n c h of a s t i c k y

s u b s t a n c e , which p r e v e n t e d t h e d u s t p a r t i c l e s i n t h e e f f l u e n t

from r e c e i v i n g t h e p o s i t i v e c h a r g e and t h u s reduced c o l l e c t i o n

e f f i c i e n c y . It w a s e s t i m a t e d t h a t ' c l e a n i n g o f t h e p l a t e s

would r e q u i r e shutdown of t h e k i l n f o r a week or so. A

shutdown w a s s chedu led f o r t h e week o f J u l y 15 t o allow

Clean ing of t h e ESP, r e b r i c k i n g o f c e r t a i n k i l n s e c t i o n s , ,

and r o u t i n e p e r i o d i c main tenance . F u r t h e r emis 'sions t e s t i n g

w a s t o be conducted s h o r t l y a f t e r resumpt ion of k i l n o p e r a t i o n .

18

Page 24: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

V I I . SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

Sampling p rocedures were d e s i g n a t e d by EPA. Analyses of

c o l l e c t e d samples w e r e performed by PEDCo. Appendix H p r e s e n t s

d e t a i l e d sampling and a n a l y t i c a l p rocedures .

V e l o c i t y and Gas Temperature

Gas v e l o c i t i e s were measured w i t h a c a l i b r a t e d t y p e S

p i t o t tube and i n c l i n e d d r a f t gage. V e l o c i t i e s w e r e measured

a t each sampling p o i n t a c r o s s t h e s t a c k d i ame te r t o de te rmine

an average v a l u e acco rd ing t o p rocedures d e s c r i b e d i n t h e

F e d e r a l Reg i s t e r ' - Method 2 .

t h e u s e of a thermocouple .

blolecular Weight

Temperatures were measured w i t h

A 4-hour i n t e g r a t e d sample of t h e s t a c k g a s e s was c o l l e c t e d

d u r i n g t e s t 1 by pumping t h e g a s i n t o a T e d l a r p l a s t i c bag a t

t h e r a t e of approximate ly 0 . 0 0 5 CFM. T h i s bag sample w a s t h e n

ana lyzed w i t h an O r s a t a n a l y z e r f o r CO

i n t h e F e d e r a l R e g i s t e r , Method 3.

Pa r t i cu la t e s

and CO as d e s c r i b e d 2 ' 0 2 t

C o n c e n t r a t i o n s o f p a r t i c u l a t e matter i n s t a c k g a s e s were

measured by Method 5 as d e s c r i b e d i n F e d e r a l R e g i s t e r ?

t r a i n c o n s i s t i n g of a h e a t e d g l a s s - l i n e d p robe , a 3- inch d i a m e t e r

A r i g i d

1) F e d e r a l R e g i s t e r , V o l . 36, N o . 2 4 7 , December 23, 1 9 7 1 . 2 ) F e d e r a l R e g i s t e r , V o l . 3 6 , N o . 1 5 9 , August 17, 1 9 7 1 .

19

Page 25: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i 1

c 1 c 'j ci i c 1 c e ii P li I

c r-

I I

glass-fiber filter, and a series of Greenburg-Smith impingers

was used for particulate sampling, as shown in Figure 2.

Sampling was conducted under isokinetic conditions by

monitoring stack-gas velocity with a pitot tube and adjusting

the sampling rate accordingly.

The particulate sample was recovered by triple-rinsing

the nozzle, probe, cyclone by-pass, and front half of the filter

holder with acetone into a glass container. The back'half of the

filter holder, impingers, and connecting tubes were rinsed with

distilled water and the washings placed in a glass container with

the impinger contents. These components were then triple-rinsed

with acetone into another glass container. The filter was

placed in a separate container. Blank samples of water and

acetone were also taken.

NO -X

Nitrogen oxides were collected in evacuated 2-liter

flasks containing 25 ml of a dilute sulfuric acid/hydrogen

peroxide absorbing solution.

procedure was as described in Method 7 of the Federal Register

except that the final flask vacuum was read immediately after

sampling.

so -2

The sampling and analytical 1

._ Sulfur dioxide sampling procedures followed chose described

in Method 6. However, due to the low expected concentrations,

1) Federal Register, Vol. 3 6 , No. 247 , December 23, 1971.

20

Page 26: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I

C I I

w I c

_I

4 V

21

Page 27: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

~

lib

I i .I 1 II c 0 c e e E P f a

’% i I

I ‘I

larger sampling equipment was used. Flue gas was passed

through a set of Greenburg-Smith impingers at a rate of

approximately 0.8 cubic foot per minute. The first impinger

contained 150 ml of 8 0 percent isopropanol; the second and

third impingers contained 100 ml each of 3 percent hydrogen

per6xide/water solution. After sampling, ambient air was passed

through the train for 10 to 15 minutes. The isopropanol solution

was discarded, and the peroxide solution rinsed into a.glass

container. The hydrogen peroxide solution was titrated with

barium chloride, using a Thorin indicator as described in

Method 6 .

Visible Emissions

Visible emissions were determined according to procedure,

in Method 9. Readings were difficult to determine at times due

to trucks loading and unloading ESP dust and quarry rock in the

vicinity of either the ESP unit or the observer and the light

colored plume against an overcast and partly cloudy sky caused

poor distinction. In additioh, certain ESP rappers set up

a visible emission condition (puffs) that read approximately

5 to 10 percent opacity for about 2 to 3 seconds every cycle.

Sulfur Analysis

Solid samples were analyzed using Standard Methods of

Chemical Analysis of Limestone, Quicklime and aydraded Lime,

C25-67, A.S.T.M. Standards, Part 9, Cement; Lime;’Gypsum, 1972,

American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.

22 .

Page 28: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i

Fuel oil samples were analyzed using Standard Method of Test

for Sulfur in Petroleum Products by the Bomb Method, D 129-64,

A.S.T.M. Standards, Part 17, Petroleum Products - Fuels, Solvents, Burner Fuel Oils, Lubricating Oils, Cutting Oils, Lubricating

Greases, Hydraulic Fluids, 1972, American Society for Testing

Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.

I b i

E Q

i. I I

.

23

Page 29: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i i b r 1 I i i c E i I c E N

'B . I' I I'

APPENDIX A

PARTICULATE RESULTS AND

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS

Page 30: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

Table Al. SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS 1

i 'i P

3 - 5 - 1 - 7/8/74 7/9/74 7/10/7 4

1713 0841 8 24 2129 1248

ESP O u t l e t ESP O u t l e t ESP O u t l c

0.375 0.375 0.375

240 240 240

29.48 29.48 29.40

11.26 12.14 11.40

.E874 .E786 .E860

21.66 21.0 19.6

8.0 8.67 11.4

0 0 0

70.34 . . io.33 69.0 ..

74.7 86.4 164

i I

Page 31: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

. . - . __

S t i i t i c 1'1-cssui-e oE S t a c k i l l : llq

1 -

30.23

.83

621

48

0.03

29.51

2928

21.992

27619

64393

102.9 -

%Lfa

781.1

1704.6

54.2

0.051

0.111 .

3 -

30.04

.83

669

48

0.03

29.51

3060

21.992

27390

67296

104.5 -

* 718.9

989.9

24.4

0.046

0.064

5 - 30.04

.83

67 4

48

0.03

29.43

3198

21.992

28658

70330

103.6 - -

417.0

889.3

53.1

0.026 . 0.055

Page 32: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

. . ---.. : : \ A 1 1 ;:f.J. Table A1 ( con t inued) ‘I

I b ‘ci

3 -

L

1 I

Page 33: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

e 6

c

: . c b L

, C a a I,

< 1

~

c

. 4 e .

Page 34: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I

I

I

I 0

r( 4 m . Q Ll N

0

0 f N

VI - I U U K - u :z

8

0 0

u

0' 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 35: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

b

I

4 I- Q a z 0 - v) In L W

-

8

0

8

0

b

-. "Icc . .*. . . . ! . . . . :: i.... ' .

0 0

_. . d 0

-

0

Page 36: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I I I I I I I , I I I I , , I 4

It d I I ' I I I I I I I I 1 . j # , ,

Page 37: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I I # I

I.

N

m YI N

n

0

D 0 N

UI -I 4 I- O I-

I 0

I # I I I I I I I

I

t

e

Page 38: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

a c \ D c \ c D

w I- 4 0

0

*1 -I J - > zl

3

. a a - a 2 c J E

J J J . > > 3 3 x

L

1

0 0

f .. N

VI m a a S "I c X U

I- VI

x 0 S

A W > I- t 3 u)

a

-

I I I I I I I

,

0 .4 N 4 .

. I- z w I- z 0 U

w

I- VI " 0 S

a a

I' i

i

I i

l

a

Page 39: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

. I *

I

0

Page 40: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I

si p: i

I I I

i I 1

I I I

i

I

a P . 0 . c 3

..

u c - 0

a J

J x J

c c J

I I J

.

. :' I ,

I , I!

I

, I 1

-- b

I t I I I I ' I I I I I b I I

b

I

b b

Page 41: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

V I , @ . @ .

8 I I

D. n > 4

b L

1 i I I

I

I !

I

, I

I !

c 1 L ..

I- z W I- r 0 U

w U I- u)

0 L

a -

I 8 I , I a

* a u t

I

I

0

0 0 c

Page 42: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

CALCULATIONS I i ci; 4 1.

1. Volume of d r y 3 g a s sampled a t s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s - 7 0 ° F , 2 9 . 9 2 " Ilg. f t .

1 7 . 7 1 X 2 5 6 . 9 1 1 ( 2 9 . 4 8 + 3.01 - - 1 3 . 6 - -

s td vrn

V o l u m e of water v a p o r a t 7 0 ° F & 2 9 . 9 2 " Hg, F t . 3

( 1 0 8 . 5 + 4 6 0 ) (Tm + 4 6 0 ) = 237 .710

2.

= 0 . 0 4 7 4 X Vw = F t . 3 = ( 0 . 0 4 7 4 ) ( 6 3 6 . 7 ) = 3 0 . 1 8 0 gas

vW

100 x vw %M = gas = 1 0 0 X 3 0 . 1 8 0 = 1 1 . 2 7

237 .710 + 3 0 . 1 8 0 + vw s td . gas 'm

4. Mole f r ac t ion of d r y gas

3. % m o i s t u r e i n s t a c k gas

= 100 - % M = 1 0 0 - 1 1 . 2 7 = .E873 100 100

Md

5. Average molecular w e i g h t of d r y s t a c k gas

M W = ( % C 0 2 . X 44) + ( % 0 2 X 3 2 ) + ( % N X 2 8 ) 2 - ~

100 100 i o 0 = ( 2 1 . 6 6 X . 4 4 ) + (8 X . 3 2 ) + ( 7 0 . 3 4 X . 2 8 )

= 3 1 . 7 9

Page 43: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

6. Molecular weight of s t a c k gas

M W = M W d X Md + 1 8 (1 - Md)

(31.79) ( .8873) + ( 1 8 ) (1-.8873) = 30.23

7 . S t a c k v e l o c i t y @ s t a c k c o n d i t i o n s , fpm

= 1062.6c X%P X (Ts +

= 2923

vs P

= (1062.6) ( . 83 ) C.389) (621+460) 1 (29.51) (30.23)

8. S t a c k gas volume @ s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s , SCFM

1 7 . 7 1 x v x A~ x M~ x pS s = (17.71) (2923) (21.992) (.E8731 (29.5 - Qs -

(621 + 460)

= 27576 (Ts + 4 6 0 )

9 . P r c e n t i s o k i n e t i c

1032 X (Ts + 460) X Vm

Vs X Tt X Ps X Md X (D,)

s t d - (1032) (621+460) (237.710) I - %I = I 2 (2923) (240) (29.51) (.E8731 ( .375)2 I

= 102.7

1 0 . P a r t i c u l a t e - p r o b e , c y c l o n e , & f i l t e r , gr/SCF

= 0.0154 X Mf - = (0.0154) (781.1) = 0.051 'an "rn s t d 237.710

Page 44: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I i i ‘ 1 e P t 1 ii c B f 5’ f

# c i

I I

11. P a r t i c u l a t e t o t a l , qr/SCF

M = - = (0.0154) (1704.6) = 0.11 ‘a0 . . I

V m s t d 237.710

12. P a r t i c u l a t e - probe , c y c l o n e & f i l t e r , qr/CF a t s t a c k c o n d i t i o n s

17.71 X Can X P X Ma S

= (17.71) (0.051) (29.51) (.8873) - - ‘at

(621 + 460) = 0.022 (Ts + 460)

13 . P a r t i c u l t 0 3 C c o n d i t .ons

17.71 X Cao X P X Ma S = (17.71) (0.11) (29.51) (.8873) - -

‘au (621 + 460)

(T, + 460) = 0.047

1 4 . P a r t i c u l a t e - probe , c y c l o n e , & f i l t e r , l b / h r .

Caw = 0.00857 X Can X Q, = (.00857) (.051) (27576) = 12.05

.. 15. P a r t i c u l a t e - t o t a l , l b / h r .

Cax = 0.00857 X Cao X R, = (.00857) (0.11) (27576) = 26.0

Page 45: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I I

i

F

i.

f

APPENDIX E

GASEOUS RESULTS AND

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS

Page 46: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

NO; CALCULATIONS

TEST A

I

1. Sample Volume

w h e r e : V = S a m p l e v o l u m e a t s t d . c o n d . , d r y S b a s i s , ml.

= Volume of f l a s k antl v a l v e , m l . Pf = F i n a l a b s o l u t e p r e s s u r e of f l a s k , in.IIcj. P . = I n i t i a l a b s o l u t e p r e s s u r e of f l a s k , i n . HCJ.

Tf = F i n a l a b s o l u t e t e m p e r a t u r e of f1asl:;R.

T . = I n i t i a l a b s o l u t e t e m p e r a t u r e of f l a s k , R.

vO

1

1

Vs = 1 4 5 7 n i l .

2 . PPb1 NO2

" S

w h e r e : C = C o n c e n t r a t i o n of NO ,PPEl . (d ry b a s i s )

M = Mass Of N O i n q a s sample, mg.

V = G a s s a m p l e v o J u m e 0 7 0 F antl 2 9 . 9 2 " I J < I .

2

2

S ~

C = . 2 9 8 . 8 PPM

I' 111 I

Page 47: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

3 . L!3S/r117 NO2

M.W. EH = (PPM) (Q,) ( 6 0 G ) h r x 387 E t /lb-mole .- -

I

where: E-R = Emission R a t e in l h s / h r .

PPM= Parts per million N O 2 (dry basis) MW = Molecular weight of NO 4 6 . 0 1 2 '

E R = ( 7 . 1 3 3 ) (PPM) ( O s ) x

ER = ( 7 . 1 3 3 ) ( 2 9 8 . 8 ) ( 27619 , ) x

E17 = 58.9 LBS/€IR

Page 48: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I Q

I I

I

i I

I I 1 I I

!

i 1. 0 U

W S

A

2

3. 0 0 0 3

z 0

I-

U 0 A f t- I Q 0 I r- 0

c(

LI

z!

8 4

a

LI a

I I a

I-

0

. 0 2

I- u) W

i

I

I I I

1

I I

Ll S

0

n c 0 N

W S 3 -4 0 > Y In -4 U N N

*

a

z 0 i X u)

-1 Y

* 2

-1

t U In

a

I

a

i

N

N I 0

I I

. w a '* !I-

0

YI N

. i ! . I - ; 5

L.) U

' W

! U 0

a

I

i I I I

i I i !

i I I

1 I

-4

I- O c I

a II

a

m

a i

I

I I I ! I I

I

I

I

I

l a ro ro N

. C N l3 W -1 + 4 l3 W -1

2 a I- O c

D m a

4- II U

I D O n Q .. rtN

I N-l

4 0-c w w o 22I-

N 0 z Y 0

I l l 1

I !

! ?

! _ !

I

Page 49: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

- i i

I I

i i !

I

, .

I I

~

~

I I

I

t

I

I i

m f

*) .

~

i 1 !

~

~

I

~

! I I

i I

i I

I !

1 I

I

I

i I

I

i

I

I I

0 U

W S

-1

u 2 -1

> 0 0 0 3

z e 4 V 0 -1

f * I m 0 I

IC 0

c(

c.

2

I j j I !

j l p i 1c b

j I

'!

i

1

1 i

I i

I I

i

i

i I 1 i

!

! I

i I

!

I

I I

!

I

I

I

I

i I i t

!

i I I

I I I I

i

.i

I

!

i

i I

I

I I

I ! I I I

I I i

' ! i I i ! I j

I

I I I t I i I

j I i

I i

i ! I

I

i I I

,

a m rD N

. . I I

II N m W -1 + d 1?1 w -1 L 4

! g c

I t I r n

0 ! II

0 0 0 I T h * ) O

NnrD d d N

...

II N 0 w -1 +

. r ( m w A ' -1 U I- O I- I

II LL P

m n I. a

1 2 l a

' > I.

n 0 0 *)Lo

4 N ..

U

P '

0 . I-

* : O ! '

* a I

m v) S z Q 0 d n

I- 4

(u 0 2

U 0

-1 3 U -1 4 U

I- I> 0 c 3 0

i

In c U D: II) CI A -1

t c(

Page 50: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

j I i

i i

I

!

I i I i

I

I I I I ! j 1 j ,

I

I

i

i i I

i ! ! i i i i I I

!

~

1 i' i !

j j 1

I !

I

i

I

I ! 1 : i i

I

1 ; I ! !

0 u i i

-1 z w L s , C I ' -1

I

i i

! I I 1

! I

!

j . I I i I

I. i . m m . m

i II N 0 w 3 4 (I W -1

-1

I- O I-

a

m n

e- II n

l

* * c N

.

3

I- a

o,

i

'.' i i I

0.

i N

' 0 z IL 0

3 C - Y

Page 51: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

..I , / M I ,:. . i

i j

I b m 1 c i ii f c i b c

I

!

I I I

! !

I

i i

! 1

I I I I

, i : I

I

i H N W W i

1 -I

C \I U 11 C \I a i U

-1

I- O I- #

a

m a

a

I a 0 0

11 U

1

> N ? .. .+.IN

I 0

m a

a

I- t

I I I

I i . I- Ln m

i : +N-I

4 W W I - w w o -1AI-

N . + A WWI- U J O J I -

e a 1

I 1 1

1

. O

I .

m . u) f z 0 0 ru I

N 0 z I-

: a x : a Y I

In

- 1 .

Y 0

!

a. 0 2 . 1

l it

i

I 1 (L U W

r ! In w :

T i

Page 52: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

... . . ._ I" I, '. 1

I I

~

I !

! I

I

I i I

i I I I

I I !

i i ~

~

I I

!

1

! !

i !

j

!

I I

i I

I

!

I I I

I i I i I

!

I

!

i !

I

i

I ~

I

!

I i

!

I

i

h i 0 S cI -1

w A

> 0 0 0 3

z 0 c.( I-

u 0 A

c I m 0 I l-

2

a

b

o LI I- 4 0

i W

0 2

UI w I-

.. c?

I

!

I

I i

! !

!

i

i

!

i I

I I

!

i I

I !

I- CY A I-

i 2 n

io)

I i d I . ' 0 z z A Y

W S

-1

I W

- I

, ! !

, . . j

I

!

1 !

I

i i i

i I /

S U U UI 0

0 0

0 m m I. N

W I- 4 z x 0 J Y

.

.

I U N (D W J +

. r ( I 3 W J

N 0 N X

I- 2 W ul

Y [L

a

2 4 I- 0 I- * U n

m n

%

c E 1 f i I 1

c .

+ + Y U

0 0 m m

u II . M Y +I-

.. !

I

I 1

, I I

I

I I I I I

I

I I I : < I

,

!

i 0 0 0 t c m o ... N - 4 d d N

Y 0

0 d

d .

X u U I- In > K O

N A 4

(Doc Y W O A A ? . .

I I n

2

L

a

in

Y 0

v) e 4 K 0

-1 J

S

CI

M

A L 4 VI

n

i

II

I II a u w

Page 53: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I

i I

i .I

1

. !

I ~

i i

~

!

I

! I

I

i j

i

- i i I I

I j 1 i I I

I I

I

i I ! I

1 !

1 i I 0 U

dl 5 A W A A > 0 0 0 3

z 0

I- C U 0 A f r- I 0, 0 I r- 0

W I-

0

c(

I

a

I

4 0 z c m W

I i

!

i

i i i

I I

i

i

! ~

i I

i I

I 1

I i

I

i

!

I

I I

.I- W -1 I- 3 0

! P

1 :s.l

! O ' 2

Iz

1:

. .I ' X

I W l S , " ,-I

' Z

' I - i s : w i o " U

' W ; o

0

.n 0 N

L 3 A 0

X u)

A U

in

. m

L L

?

a

i i 0 z x v)

A LL

II

A P S 4 m

a

z,

I

i

i !

I

!

!

!

i i I

I ~

I

I

I I

I j

j I !

N 0 N I

: c

0 a ' w

K !

' 5

I:: W 0 * I-

-1 = 0

' i n ' N

i I I C ' 2 . w ' ( I) : a

W : a u

.

j o i U I: 3

: A

i g

i i

i I i I

I ! I !

I i i i

i I

i I

I

~

i

i I

i I

i I I I ' 0 0 0 lnr ( \D '. . . -Id01 w m i n

I

!

I

I ~

i 1

. .

I !

! r- m m . I 11 N c) w -1 + A II Y A A 4

0 I- I m a

9- I

II I

m m

v .

r-

A I- O I- I

a

m a

n I

I I U

n m . ( A

d N ..

4 : ' X . i v ) a 1-1

I

I ! i

i j I

I1 ! u :

X Y mu) A A ULL

a u

. 5 D 0 t

L U n D

0 P

D m c) b N

AI

L

I 3 4

.

r a

L . J 3 > L U a

I I

Page 54: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i

1: i e I k E b i t Y :

i

iil

1

! !

I i

I i

! i

i i i

I

i !

I I i I I

i i I

I i I I

~

1

I i I i I

I

I

~

I I

1 I

I

i

i i I

I I i

i

0 u I W S A

2 2 n w 0 0 0 x z 0 n c 4 V 0 2

t c I

01 0 1 c

I4

Ij

0 Ll a c 0

! !

e 0 z v) W c

. 6

I

I

i i

I I I

I 1

!

! i I

i

I

I

I I

I

1

I

!

I j

j ! !

! I

i i I I- . w

: A ' I - 3 0

! $

!; i W 3 . 4

, z I =

j x A n

' W ir,

! Z I Z

' I - : a i L I

W : n

' l b i o i o I

I I I ! I i i I

i

I

I

1 I I

I

!

!

!

! I

i

1 ! 1 i

' 2 N I

~

t- ; z W

I O , u W

i

i = ! g

!::

: w 0 *

i t -

0

Lo . N

. i I I-

' Z / W i a : a : w l a i l b 10

Y S

I 3 ' 2 10

,

I I

I

0 0 0.4

d.4 .. d N

W O W U A 2

4 R .n 0

II 0 9 t

u.

n 0 d

II I1 -u. *I-

. z n

0 e f

m N

I I

. m n - Y e 2 v) v) W LI n

I 11 LI u w

I ? ?

Page 55: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i i I ! I !

i I

! ! !

I

j i

I I j I I

i

I !

I

I

I i I

I I I I !

I

I I i

!

w z: A

-1 -1

> 0 0 0 3

c(

w CI

0 .. I. - - - 1 I I ! I I

I

! I i I

! !

1 $ i b

I .

I I i I ~

~i I

! I I I

I I

' I

i

i I

I I i

I I I I

I I

i I

I ! I

i

i I i

I ! I ! ; !

I

!

! 1 i I I !

i

I

I I

i I i I

i I i

I .

i I

i i I 5

;+ d 0

d . N 0 z u. 0

In e 4 X a A A

e

" "

I ! I

I ! .

!

I

j i I , I I

~ I !

I

j I I

j I I

i I i I

I I i

i

i I !

! I

I

I I

i

!

i I i I !

. .

i 1 I I

I

i I I !

! I I !

I

! i \

i I

I I

I

!

I ! 1 1

!

Page 56: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I

I

I I

" !

, !

! !

!

!

I i !

!

j ! I

i

I

!

j 1 ! I

i

1 ! ! I 1

I

I

1

i

I 1 !

i I

I

I I.

i i 1

~ I

I

I

~

j i

! !

I

! i

0 y il S

-1

-1

> 0 0 0 3

2 0

I- 4 U 0 A f r- 1 0 d 1 c 0

w I-

0

I

w d

I

a

i - 0 2

I- ln w c

*

!

. . . .

! I !

i

I

i i ~

I

!

j

!

!

I I , i

.. I / ! i

j i !

1 I

j

I i

i

I

! i I

i I I t n n I

n N 0 W -1 + d 0 W -1

A I- O I-

#

. I

a

m a

n II I

I '

i i . I

I i i

I

i

I I

1 i

I I ~

! I

I I I

0 rn i . IC N

II N 0

' W

I 5 LL U 0) 0

0 0

m m \D 41 N

W I- 4 K

31 0 -1 Y

-1

> X c: 4 c v:

C

C 0 0 C

a

n

I. !

i 0

S . n m 0 N

S 3 -1 0

Ij

? x ln 4 -1 LL

Y) d

-1 +

-1

i I

I i 1 I i I

i I I

8 m a

n II U. u

I I Dln

! I

0 0 d d

d d N ... : ! AN,

U o 0 I - w w o -1-1I-

0

t a I

!.. 6 N

! 0 z X VI 4 A LL

e 1

-1

t 4 ln

+I

a

I- U -I 3

Y ln a

/ 2

U

S 4 I U

w i -1

c., ' I L

' - 1 4

l a i L i

. w i I n

I ' i ; ! I '

Page 57: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I !

I

j i

I

I !

I

i

i

1 I i

!

i

I

i

I I

!

I

i I !

, i

I !

j

I

I

!

i

I 1

! I

! !

I

1 i i

I I j U c

. -1 : I - ' 3 ' 0

i a ; 2 i l

14 ! Y

I 5

' 0 ' Z I

: w

I-1 : z 0

' 0 4 : c a Y

. o ' L L ' 0

.Id

: * c

a

n

: n

I

I I i I

! x U U 0) 0

0 0

a Y) rD Q N

w I- 4 e x 0 -1 U

-1 0 > Y u c ln

* K

.

. a

n

-1

d La Y 2

4 0 ro t I1 0 rD f

U . 0

I1 U I-

O

s c 0 N

w r 3 -I 0

Y ln 4 -1 U

.

?

6 i I

4

i i 0 z X ln 4 -1 LL

e z -1 a r

w

a ?

i

-1 4 I- '2

I

I m a 11 n

. I a I ! i

i

I

I

I !

! ! I

i

La x . 2 04

0 0 t

m N

I1 P

. n .

I U ! O

z 0

I- 4 U 0 -1

f c I 0 r. n e

O

U I- 4

w

n

i 3

0 z c In Y

.

0 d

r. .

u. 4 .

N 0 I

IT

a a

n .ln n. z 0 . 0 H . "

! % -I

: 3 ! U

W -1

I: u e ' S a

! L

V' L or' I

i

f r o a t . . j

It I1 a U W I

N

Page 58: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I 0 !

I

I

I

1 '

! :

! I !

! I ! N Ir . : o

! i

I ,

!

I

I

I I I i I ~

I . I I

I

i ! !

0 U

S n A

A

> 0 0 0 I

z 0 n I- 4 U 0 A f I- I 0 d B I-

lb

ILl

2

q W I- 4 0

! !

zc. 0 z

In W

i

j I

t

I

I

I

1 I

!

1

!

I

I !

:I- w A I- 3 : o a

!In ; w

I ? 0

' 2

' 2 A n

. x W

' A ' Z 0 n

:I- 4

i u ' Y ; a I O

IL 40

/ W . a ; *

- I I '

I ' I ! I !

I

I ,

i m N

N . I ii N W W A + d W W A 2

I- O I- t

a

m a 11 n

i 1 ! ! i I I

I I i i i I I

i ! i I i

2 a I-

o, B m a

a I1 LL

I 0 0 .-Id

d N

NLI

o m + Y Y O A A I -

.. I

a

II u 0 0 \o \o f f + * ULL

I. . d n m 4 )

Y X ' InIn: 4 4 . A A ! ULL

i I ' I 1 , ! !

W I . 5

i

! i i i I

i

!

I

i I

!

i i ~

I

! !

I i

I i

f la. U Y) 0

0 0

4) !n \o 4) N

W I-

.

a a I 0 A U

A 0 > Y U

I- UJ

. a

I

!

I i ! 1 I

!

I I I

~

I I

I I !

* ' a

i 0

rn 0 n z

0

, - 1 3

: u W A

I -

a

: I - Y : 3 U n 0 I- A 3

0 U ,

f, U

N 0 z II a a

i

I

I

Page 59: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

- - i 1 I

I I i ! !

!

1

I i I

I

I

! !

i

I I ! !

t I !

I

'!

I

i I

1 ! !

I i

!

!

I

I

i 0 N

* N

I1 N (I w A + .4 (I w

A 4 c 0 c I

.

+

m a

a II Y

i 1 : ! I

I I ! I

! '

I

i ; I !

I I

I I I

I

A .i I I

S

0

t I- O N

S 3 -1 0

Y v)

A Y

I

. u

w

a

rc !

0 i 2

i

i

i

!

1

i

I I I. ! I !

! j

I

i i I I

i i !

! I

j

I

!

I

~

j . ...

! I !

I ! i

i i I I ..

i i

i ! i I I I '

01 N

N

i

N 0 W -I + 4 (I W A

A

c O c 8

I1

. ii

a

m a

n c1

I ' i I '

j

i i

I I

i

!

$

I !

I

K

* f Y)

II 0 rp f

Y

* Q

II Y I-

.

!

i

i I ~

!

I

i ! i

I i i ! i I 1

I I

! I

!

!. I i

I i i

!

I I

i i i I I

!

! I

1 !

I

I

I

1

I I

!

I

i

s - : K ! ~

0 ;

I R N .Dm I-R O Q f

I . .

' i i

I I1

v w II a

, A i " : I - ' Y

l a

I 5 i I i i

Page 60: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

SO2 CALCULATIONS (Test 2 )

A H (Pbar + 13.6 Vmstd = Vm (Tstd)

(Tm) (Pstd) 1.90

( 180.062) (530) (29.48 + 13.6 Vmstd - ( 566) (29.92)

Vmstd = 166.917 std cu. ft.

- (Vt-Vtb) (N) (Vsoln) (.032) (24.5) (lo6) PPMS02 - (64) (28.316) (Va) (Vmstd)

PPMS02 = ( 28-52] (0.0188 ) (510 ) (.032) (24.5) (lo6) (64) (28.316) (10. ) (166.917)

PPMS02 = 70.8 ppm by volume

cS02 = (7.05~10-~) (Vt-Vth) ( H ) (Vsoln) (Vmstd) (Val

CS02 = (7.05~10-~) ( 28.52) (0.0188 ) ( 510) (166.917 ) (10 )

CS02 = 1.155~10-5 lb/std cu. ft.

Emission rate - (CS02) (Qsstd) (60) -5 Emission rate = (1.155X10 ) (27619 ) (60)

Emission rate = 19.1 lb/hr.

Page 61: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

~~~~

SO2 CALCULATIONS ( T e s t 4 )

AH V m s t d = Vm ( T s t d ) ( P b a r + 13.6 I

(Tm) ( P s t d )

( 1 8 1 . 1 1 ) ( 5 3 0 ) ( 29 .48+ 13.6 Vrns td - i i (574 ) ( 2 9 . 9 2 )

Vrnstd = 1 6 5 . 5 4 9 s t d c u . f t . P I

.I i 0 E i

PPMS02 - - ( V t - V t b ) ( N ) (Vso ln ) ( . 0 3 2 ) ( 2 4 . 5 ) ' ( l o 6 ) ( 6 4 ) ( 2 8 . 3 1 6 ) ( V a ) (Vms t d )

PPMS02 = ( 3 - 1 2 ) (0 .0188 ) ( 6 5 0 ) ( . 0 3 2 ) ( 2 4 . 5 ) ( i o 6 ) ( 6 4 ) ( 2 8 . 3 1 6 ) ( 1 0 ) ( 1 6 5 . 5 4 9 )

PPMS02 = 1 0 . 0 ppm by vo lume

CS02 = ( 7 . O ~ X ~ O - ~ ) ( V t - V t h ) ( H ) (Vsoln)

( V m s t d ) ( V a )

( 1 6 5 . 5 4 9 ) ( 1 0 )

CS02 = 1 . 6 2 4 ~ 1 0 - ~ lb/s td cu . f t .

E m i s s i o n r a t e - ( C S 0 2 ) ( Q s s t d ) ( 6 0 )

E m i s s i o n r a t e = (1 .624XlO ) ( 2 7 3 9 0 ) ( 6 0 )

E m i s s i o n r a t e = 2 - 6 7 l b / h r .

-6

Page 62: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i I I I 0 s I I

I I P

1 0 I I U

. P ll I I

i

SO2 CALCULATIONS (TEST NO. 6)

AH (Pbar + 13.6 Vmstd = Vm (Tstd)

(Tm) (Pstd) 1.85

( 180.024) (530) (29.40 + 13.6 Vmstd - (565 ) (29.92)

Vmstd = 166.705 std cu. ft.

PPMS02 = (Vt-Vtb) (N) (Vsoln) (.032) (24.5) (lo6) (64) (28.316) (Va) (Vmstd)

PPMS02 = (17.90 ) (0.0188 ( 590) (-032) (24.5) (lo6) (64) (28.316) (10 l(166.705)

PPMS02 = 51.5 ppm by volume

CS02 = (7.05~10-~) (Vt-Vth) (H) (Vsoln) (Vmstd) (Va)

CS02 = (7.05~10-~) (17.90 )(0.0188 ) (590 ) (166.705 (10 )

CS02 =8.398~10-~ lb/std cu. ft.

Emission rate - (CS02)'(Qsstd) (60) Emission rate = ( 8 .397x10q6 ) (28658 ) ( 6 0 )

Emission rate = 14.4 lb/hr.

Page 63: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i I

i c c e

e e

APPENDIX D

OPERATING RESULTS

L

C

Page 64: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

* C W 5 . w - 5 nn

Page 65: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I 1 i c1 E E c i I

Page 66: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 67: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 68: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 69: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

b I

EL c ii E li ii i: i

(u - .

Page 70: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 71: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

E E k b c i ci 1

?- .’

Page 72: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I Stone T c t a l i z e r ) ~ ' ~ ~ ~ - 5- Stone Riite

- r '-. , ,

%i,ing Zone Tempt

- ESP I n l e t Tempt ,

ESP Outlet Tenpt

ESP "A" Field

Primary Current

Prec ip i ta tor Current

ESP "B" Field

3$

t3/t1r

/,/

ainps ILz iE

4J.B

7- - 1 *2

c/G

. . .

t

/

- -. .

- /"

Page 73: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

S t o n e Rate #-

Feed Erid K.i.ln 7 m p t

ES? In le t T m p t

Un.i t s

ti.F\. . -- o n s / h r .

G a l s . --

a l s / h r .

" F

"F

OF

an:ps

\KJl tS

a i y s

I

3 S6 .r a-- i

q---

Page 74: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

- 1; ESP Outlet Yeinpt

1 , ESP "A" Field !.

1 I Primary Cwrent

Pt-eci p i t a t o r Current

ESP "E" Field

__ I ro: .- /Ob ; 7/11

Page 75: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

k 1 d ,Gk.L'/Z x /+fK ty*~> LWXL 4,6i/J/o

CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF NOTES TIIRQUGIiOUT PROJECT (NOT COVERED BY DAILY PERSONNEL AND LOG S H E E T )

Page 76: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 77: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i c E l c li c E

c: c; f c E l I 1

I

Office of (he Vice Presided Phone 849-4311

WOODVILLE. OHIO

August 2 3 , 1 9 7 4

EPA Mutual P l a z a Room 9 2 6 Research T r i a n g l e P a r k , N. C. 27711 '

At tn : M r . Gene R i l e y

Dear S i r :

Herewith e n c l o s e d p l e a s e - f h d c o p l e s o f your r e s e a r c h d a t a s h e e t s , w i t h t h e s t o n e ra te r e c a l c u l a t e d t o a more r e a s o n a b l e f i g u r e . T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n was p laces . i n your column f o r G a s T o t a l i z e r , which I have r e l a b l e d a s

The f a c t o r t h a t I used was S t o n e R a t e T/hr . T h i s f a c t o r t h e s t h e t D t a l inc?icatc$. tonnage

r e a s o n a b l e f i g u r e t o c a l c u l a t e t h e amount of 1 l i m e produced.

A s I i n d i c a t e d o u r o i l t o t a l i z e r gives u s a v e r y good i n d i c a t i o n of t h e t o t a l amount of o i l u s e d , b u t a s a whole I t e n d t o d l s c o u n t t h e hour by hour f i g u r e s .

Yours v e r y t r u l y , d

George Judd Chief C h e n i s t

..

Page 78: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I i i I P I 15 P # f ii I f i fi e L

1 c

APPENDIX E

FIELD DATA

Page 79: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

- e-

SCHEihlTIC OF SAidPLING LOCATION

-- '(RA'JEifSE $,,AT LOCATION

IT.O;il OUTSIDE DF NIPPLE DISTANCE 0

Page 80: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

C b h c E i ir li E E € c I I

Page 81: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I i‘ Lii c I I c cs 0 .. c

Page 82: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 83: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I i c

. c f 6 1

Page 84: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i i c II I c B c U 5 b 0 c 1 I B I I I

a 4:

0 0

T N 0

I

.

Q

D 0 7 a'

3- rsa

Page 85: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 86: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

c ; ci ci c I c li c C c c c c

Page 87: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i a b c c I c E II 5

i c c ci i b I I

i

Page 88: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

.. .

, -.

c

Page 89: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

k

r i e 1 C c B c E c c c Ifi B i c'

"ic

Page 90: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

.

Page 91: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 92: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

E i

i c' i

Page 93: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i

i k R 1 D E L c i i 1

5 5; c P c 1 :

I

L 3

-

N

a 0 - N' r.7

0 0

m - N

/3

a

13 Q

Iu

0

0 0 -

G.3 N

J < c 0 t

Page 94: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i i lii li 0 I 5 E

E n I

s L

0 >

& P h

Page 95: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

. . . . . -. ... .. . . . ..

Page 96: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

. , . .... 4 . i I ! . . .. S U I T E 6 . A T I ~ : I N ~ U N SOUA.HE

CINCINNATI . O H I O 4 5 2 4 6 513 /771-4330

ANALYTICAL DATA i

W6nD J l.LLF L I .Vr(^ co. Date 7 -&--I

2 . Sampling l o c a t i o n L ' \ ~ F U \ L ~ W , I e? O C V L a Run. N o . 1 3 . Sample Type sL~l.W~~c Rr i v Y M \ F , r Sample BOX N O . 4 4 . Clean-up Man F- ~ ~ V 0 1 ~ 5

I

MOISTURE MUTE: S \ L I ' ~ ( ) W L WfiS 5l\-Tuem IMP I NGE RS SILICA GEL

c 1 F i n a l Volume -1,58 ML F i n a l N t . 773.79. 9. g. ,558

3 3 . 2 g * /

ML N e t W t . . <>-Jg. g . '9. 3 9 f ' 7 I n i t i a l Volume 300 ML I n i t i a l W t . zoo&. 9.

TOTAL MOISTURE ,7,q1,> g. N e t Volume SSK

92or 3 - k . LABORATORY RESULTS .hpp!? at3 1 2 3 4 . 5 6 7

E C' 5

# k t I E 11 II

i

i

GROSS TARE BLANK

FRONT HALF

Acetone wash o f n o z z l e , p robe , cyc lone ( b y p a s s ) , f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r .

F i l t e r Number

Water wash of n o z z l e , p robe , cyc lone ( b y p a s s ) , f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r .

BACK HALF

I m p i n g e r , c o n t e n t s and water wash of imp inge r s , c o n n e c t o r s , and back h a l f o f f i l t e r h o l d e r .

Acetone wash o f i m p i n g e r s , connec tors , and back h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r

7

Conta ine r 1. m g

C o n t a i n e r 2 . my

Water 3. m g Con ta ine r

Con ta ine r Ether-Chloroform E x t r a c t i o n 4 . mg

FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL mg

Conta ine r Impinger Water ._ 5 . lllg

Con ta ine r Ether-Chloroform E x t r a c t i o n 6 . mg

Con ta ine r 7 . mg

BACK HALF SUBTOTAL mg

TOTAL WEIGHT mg

Page 97: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

,_ .. -. .... ~

Page 98: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i e h I # L

Page 99: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I - 'L;LLJLrJ-tLIuvl I \ 'Ol \ ln,L-_l \ l I A L S U I T E 8 . A T K I N S O N S Q U A R E

C I N C I N N A T I . O H I O 4 5 2 4 6 i 513 1771 .4330

ANALYTICAL DATA

1 1. P l a n t w->yi /L4 & /z Date 7- ?- 77 2 . Sampling l o c a t i o n //e& KILN &st/ d 7 ~ & Run No. 9 3 . Sample Type 3 D., Sample Box No. --

3 1-5 6 b/.' 4 . Clean-up Man J . L . P

MOISTURE 3 P F i n a l W t . q / / J g . 9. 9.

I n i t i a l Volume ,cm ML I n i ti a 1 W t . +'dd 09 . 9 . g . N e t Volume ? I 5 ML N e t W t . F [ g . 9. 9.

2IlK SILICA GEL

b & ML

0 IMPINGERS F i n a l Volume

TOTAL MOISTURE g . 3U6.l

LABORATORY RESULTS 1 2 3 ' 4 . 5 6 1

GROSS TARE BLANK

FRONT HALF

A c e t o n e wash of n o z z l e , p r o b e , cyc lone C o n t a i n e r 1. ( b y p a s s ) , f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r

h o l d e r .

F i l t e r Number C o n t a i n e r 2 .

Water wash of n o z z l e , p robe , c y c l o n e C o n t a i n e r ( b y p a s s ) , f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r Water 3 . h o l d e r .

C o n t a i n e r Ether-Chlorof orm E x t r a c t i o n 4 .

FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL

'BACK HALF

Impinger c o n t e n t s a.nd water wash of imp inge r s , connec to r s ' , and back C o n t a i n e r h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r . Impinger Water 5.

m9

m 9

m9

lllg

C o n t a i n e r Ether-Chloroform E x t r a c t i o n 6 . m9

Acetone wash of i m p i n g e r s , c o n n e c t o r s , I and back h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r C o n t a i n e r 1. m9

1 BACK HALF SUBTOTAL 'nY

TOTAL WEIGHT m9

Page 100: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

. . . . ..

Page 101: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 102: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I LLL)LU L 4 4 1 I 1 .S.JIUl\ 6 - i . 1 ,--\I SUITE e . ATKINSON S O U A R E

CINCINNATI, OHIO 4524p 5 1 9 /771-433,O

ANALYTICAL DATA

a 1. P l a n t x/z L l h - 4 Date 7-\0-7c( - 2 . Sampling l o c a t i o n < I A ~ A q 6 0 / X k r Run N o . b 3 . Sample Type sox Sample Box No.

4 . Clean-up Man f. E 4 ( i > O W S

'i b

MOISTURE IMPINGERS S I L I C A GEL

$0 3 M L F i n a l W t . 497,&. 9 . 9 .

N e t Volume %Lo 4 ML g . 9 .

F i n a l Vo lume I n i t i a l Volume 600 ML ;;;t;;: W t . +gy¶: 9. 9.

c ybp 60% i:,;TOTAL MOISTURE 9 .

vor LABORATORY RESULTS

1 2 3 4 . 5 6 7

GROSS TARE BLANK

FRONT HALF

1. m q Acetone wash of n o z z l e , p r o b e , c y c l o n e C o n t a i n e r ( b y p a s s ) , f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r

h o l d e r .

2 . F i l t e r Number C o n t a i n e r

Water wash of n o z z l e , p robe , c y c l o n e C o n t a i n e r Water 3 . mg ( b y p a s s ) , f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r

h o l d e r . C o n t a i n e r Ether-Chloroform E x t r a c t i o n 4 . mcJ

mY FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL

BACK HALF

Impinger c o n t e n t s and w a t e r wash of imp inge r s , c o n n e c t o r s , and back Con ta ine r h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r . Impinger water 5 . lllq

E x t r a c t i o n 6 . mcJ

C o n t a i n e r 7 . mq

BACK HALF SUBTOTAL m 9

C o n t a i n e r Ether-Chloroform

Acetone wash of i m p i n g e r s , c o n n e c t o r s , and back h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r

TOTAL WEIGHT mg

Page 103: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i. i il" c. I f c c c e i c f 5 E 1

Page 104: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

.

Page 105: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 106: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i

h I c li c f 0 1 C Y c E a E h ci

I

i PEDCo - EPlVII3ONMEIVTAL ..........................

C I N C l N N 4 T I . Gt.10 LIZ.,,,

Page 107: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I

Page 108: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

._

Page 109: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

.

c

Page 110: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i :I i. 9 11 B c e I! P E 4 I! h il c CI 1 c 1 I

c

F

Page 111: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 112: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

Projcct N O . 3082-y

PEDCo - ENVIRONMENTAL " " I T L $ ? . .7m1..,*11 . , c , Y L u r

Page 113: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

-

I 'II I I

! e e b I t R r CI 6 c I I I

I

n _- - __._

LOCATION

Page 114: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i E r-

p_- ... .......... . ..... 3 , - I I~ST NO. DA'I 'I~ LOCATION

Page 115: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

APPENDIX F

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION LOG

Page 116: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I .

Page 117: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

E?A I.!uinber Saniole Location Run c o n t e n t s Cornri:ents

Page 118: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION LOG _ - .

b 1 .

Page 119: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

&j% 1 \ I .

71: . I :

SBi*IPLE IDENTIFICATION LOG

Page 120: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

SAMPLE IDENT I F I CAT I ON LOG

--

Page 121: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

c c B c G G c c e E 1 I c c

I

I I

APPENDIX G

LABORATORY REPORT

I I

Page 122: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

~ U I T L u . ; ~ T K I N S O ~ ' ~ S ~ ) U A N : . CINCINNATI , OHIO 4 5 2 4 6

513 / 7 7 1 - 4 3 3 0

ANALYTICAL DATA

, 1. P l a n t h,/,F,C I, , P , , w e - Date 7/59 /74

2 . Sampling l o c a t i o n &5p &,,f/&f Run No. / :.

3 . Sample Type A r #l>//L, 766 Sample Box No. 2.

ML F i n a l W t . H 7 g . g . 4 - F i n a l Volume I

I n i t i a l Volume z&@ ML I n i t i a l W t . w g . g. 4. N e t Volume 5?Zz ML N e t W t . 447 g . 9. 4 .

TOTAL MOISTURE 6 7 g . LABORATORY RESULTS

1 2 3 4 5 . 6 I

FRONT HALF

Acetone wash of n o z z l e , p r o b e , cyc lone ( b y p a s s ) , f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r .

F i l t e r Number a//,% Water wash of n o z z l e , p r o b e , c y c l o n e

(bypass ) ; f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r .

C o n t a i n e r 197 1. e,/ mg

C o n t a i n e r Water 3 . m 9

C o n t a i n e r Ether-Chloroform E x t r a c t i o n 3 . m 9

FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL n/. / mg

BACK HALF

Impinger c o n t e n t s and water wash of imp inge r s , connectors, and back h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r .

Acetone wash o f i m p i n g e r s , c o n n e c t o r s , and back h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r

C o n t a i n e r 6'99 Impinger 1Jate.r 5 . y/: 2 lug

C o n t a i n e r 700 Ethe r -Ch lo ro fo r6 E x t r a c t i o n 6. 370.5q

C o n t a i n e r &9r 7 . &/,% mg

BACK HALF SUBTOTAL 723,gmq

Page 123: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

, ._ ,.. 'L: J I . . .. ." 0 I 'i LJ I . I I ' I i . 8 . , ! I L . .

S U I T E t3 . A T K I N S O N S O U A W L C I N C I N N A T I . OHIO 4 5 2 4 6

! 513 /771-4330

ANALYTICAL DATA

1 . 4 1. P l a n t ~ ~ . / ~ ; / / p . ~ , . ~ , - ~ 4 .

c I c

Date 7-7.-7+

2 . Sampling l o c a t i o n . ,=.%p f- - Run No. -3

4 ; Clean-up Man - JL.A

F i n a l Volume . 5 4 ~ ML F i n a l W t . 6.y-r-5g. 9.. 9. I n i t i a l Volume 2~) ' FTL . I n i t i a l W t g w g . 9. ' g - N e t Volume &A4 ML N e t W t . 98&7 * 9 . g .

3 . Sample Type /& j , A // /&7& ,sample Box N O . 4

MOISTURE IMPINGERS SILICA GEL

TOTAL MOISTURE B s F r;- g . . .

LABORATORY RESULTS 1 2 3 4 5 6~ 7

FRONT HALF

Acetone wash of n o z z l e , p r o b e , cyc lone C o n t a i n e r 75d 1. x+--?&mq ( b y p a s s ) , f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r

e I h o l d e r .

F i l t e r Number /m//+ Water wash of n o z z l e , probe, cyc lone

( b y p a s s ) , f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r .

BACK HALF

Impinger c o n t e n t s and water wash of imp inge r s , c o n n e c t o r s , and back h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r .

Acetone wash of impingers , c o n n e c t o r s , and back h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r

C o n t a i n e r zc&- 2 . .7c/T:ymg

Con ta ine r Water 3 . my

C o n t a i n e r Ether-Ch l o r o f orm E x t r a c t i o n 4 . ' mg

FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL 7/5.9 mg

Conta ine r 73-g Impinger Water 5 . &?7,d l l l r j

Con ta ine r y e Ether-Chloroform E x t r a c t i o n 6. #;Z/ nig

Con ta ine r 73'7 7 . 757 my

BACK HALF SUBTOTAL 271 0 m y

TOTAL WEIGHT 9-83, 9 "'9

Page 124: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I ,... L 2 L . 1 ... , . - , ~ J ' < . ,I'.L..JIuI\IL..,-I I . - \ L .

SU ITE o . ATKINSON SUUARL- C I N C I N N A T I . OHIO 45246

513 /771-4330 i l 1

!I ANALYTICAL DATA

i . 1. P l a n t Date 7-/& - 74 11 '2 . . Sampling l o c a t i o n P Run No. 5

3 . Sample Type diu I A47 Sample BD'X N O . ' / 1..

4 . Clean-up Man # # *

MOISTURE I M P I N G E R S S I L I C A GEL F i n a l Volume ML F i n a l W t . ,425- g . 9. 9. I n i t i a l Volume a/ M L I n i t i a l W t g . 9. 9. N e t Volume ML N e t W t . Z T 9. 9 - g.

TOTAL MOISTURE A75 9. - LABORATORY RESULTS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

FRONT HALF U

Acetone wash of n o z z l e , p r o b e , cyc lone Con ta ine r 777 1. /sz. 9 m g ( b y p a s s ) , f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r 1 h o l d e r .

F i l t e r Number ,!!~/,$1< Water wash of n o z z l e , p r o b e , cyc lone

( b y p a s s ) , f l a s k , f r o n t h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r .

BACK HALF

c r

Impinger c o n t e n t s and w a t e r wash of imp inge r s , c o n n e c t o r s , and back h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r .

L

Acetone wash of i m p i n g e r s , c o n n e c t o r s , and back h a l f of f i l t e r h o l d e r

C o n t a i n e r 77& 2 . 29. i m g

Con ta ine r Water 3 . mg

Con ta ine r Ether-Chloroform

4 . mg E x t r a c t i o n

FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL 4 / z & m g

C o n t a i n e r 77-c Impinger Water 5. /m, / r11(3

C o n t a i n e r 776- Ether-Chloroform

C o n t a i n e r 774 7 . /~3.7 mg

BACK HALF SUBTOTAL .+72.'3mg

Page 125: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

. . ,

. . I

Page 126: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...
Page 127: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

L:

r r

PEDCo-ENVIRONh\ENrAL SPECIALISTS, INC . MEMORANDUM

10: R . Gerstle DATE: O C t . 2 9 , 1 9 7 4

SUBJECT: W o o d v i l l e Lime

~

cc: Wm. DeWees

F o l l o w i n g are t h e r e s u l t s of a n l a y s i s of t h e r o c k a n d o i l samples

from Woodville Lime.

Sample

#1 ESP C o l D u s t #1 ESP C o l D u s t #1 ESP C o l D u s t # 2 ESP C o l D u s t # 2 ESP C o l D u s t # 2 ESP C o l D u s t #1 S t o n e #1 Rock #1 Rock #1 Rock # 2 S t o n e # 2 Rock # 2 Rock # 2 K i l n #1 L i m e ( '1 1 I #1 Lime #1 Lime # 2 Lime # 2 Lime

#1 K i l n F u e l O i l #1 F u e l O i l # 2 K i l n F u e l O i l # 2 F u e l O i l # 2 K i l n F u e l O i l #1 F u e l O i l

Date - 7/8/74

7 /10 /74 7 /8 /74

7 /10/74 7/8/74

7 /10/74 7 /10 /74

7 /9 /74

7 /9 /74

7/9/74

7/9/74

7 /9 /74 7 /8 /74

7 /10/74 7 / 8 / 7 4 7 /10/74

7 /9 /74

7 /9 /74 7 /8 /74

7 /10/74 7 /8 /74 7/10/74

R e s u l t s ~~ - Time Ef'd (mg S/grams of s a m p l e )

1 8 3 0 740 9 . 0 5 74- 061 -

1015 7 5 2 1 3 . 2 0 8 0 0 76f 1 2 . 8 2030 74 I 7 . 8 1 2 5 5 1 0 3 0 1 7 5 0 1 1 0 0 1.7 0 0 1 0 0 0

1 2 3 0 1 3 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 7 2 0 0 9 3 0 1 0 0 0 2030 1 2 3 0

0 9 3 0 1 9 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 . 2 0 3 0 1 1 0 0

2 0 3 6

7 5 3 1 1 . 6 2 7 0 1 6 . 4

7 93 0 . 7 0 . 6

7 33. 0 . 2

7

7 6 0 0 . 7 7 3 r 1 . 4

761 0 . 4 74 4 0: 4

7 5 0 1 . 0 737 0 . 7 z9 9 0 . 4 26; 0 . 2 7 3 b' 0 . 6 2 6 7 0 . 7

w 6 . 1 7 . 5 4 2 3 9 2 2 . 6 3 c/*ll.- 1 7 . 1 2 767 .> . 8 . 7 5 23 5 3 2 . 1 6 763 2 2 . 5 6

S o l i d s w e r e a n a l y z e d u s i n g S t a n d a r d M e t h o d s of Chemical A n a l y , s i s - of L i m e s t o n e , Q u i c k l i m e , and f l y d r a d e d L ime , C25-67 , A.S.T.M. S t a n d -

a r d s , P a r t 9 , Cement : L ime; Gypsum, 1 9 7 2 , Amer ican S o c i e t y fo r

- -

Page 128: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

e

I

TO: R. Gerstle - 2- Oct. 29, 1974

Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.

Fuel oil samples were analyzed using Standard Method of Test for Sulfur in Petroleum Products & the Bomb Method, D 129-64,

A.S.T.M. Standards, Part 17, Petroleum Products - Fuels, Solvents, Burner Fuel Oils, Lubricating Oils, Cutting Oils, Lubricating

Greases, Hydraulic Fluids, 1972, American Society for Testing

Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.

- - --

r I I

Page 129: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I 1

I I '

1 1 E E l! c ! 1 r e Q c c I I

?

I I ,

I APPENDIX H

SAMPLING METHODS

Page 130: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

_ _

I I

r I t .

k a I! E r 1

e b I! I! E e! c 1 I

I I I

1

DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS

The following method was used in this test program.

Sampling procedures followed those described in the Federal

Register. 1

SAMPLING APPARATUS

The particulate sampling train used in these tests met

design specifications established by the Federal EPA and was

assembled by PEDCo personnel. It consisted of:

Nozzle - Stainless steel (316) with sharp, tapered leading edge and accurately measured round opening.

Probe - Pyrex glass with a heating system capable of maintaining a minimum gas temperature of 25OOF at the exit end during sampling.

Pitot Tube - Calibrated type S attached to probe to monitor stack gas velocity.

Filter Holder - Pryex glass with heating system capable of maintaining minimum temperature of 225'F.

Draft Gage - An inclined manometer made by Dwyer with a readability of 0.01 inches H20 in the 0-1 inch range was used.

Impingers - Four impingers connected in series with ,

glass ball joints. The first, third, and fourth impingers were of the Greenburg-Smith de'sign, modified by replacing the tip with a 1/2 inch I.D. glass tube extending to 1/2 inch from the bottom of the flask. The second impinger was of the Greenburg-Smith design with a standard tip.

Thermometer - Dial type with long stem.

Federal Register, Vol. 36, No. 241, Part 11, December 23, 1971.

Page 131: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

c I I

Metering System - Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, ther- mometers capable of measuring temperature to within 5OF, dry gas meter with 2 % accuracy, and related equipment, to maintain an isokinetic sampling rate and to determine sample volume. The dry gas meter is made by Rockwell and the fiber vane pump is made by Gast.

Barometer - Bourden tube type to measure atmospheric pressures to - + 0.1 inches Hg.

SAMPLING PROCEDURE

After selecting the sampling site and the minimum

number of traverse points, the stack pressure, temperature,

moisture, and range of velocity head was measured according

to procedures described in Method 1 of the Federal Register

(December 23, 1971).

Approximately 200 grams of silica gel were weighed in a

sealed impinger prior to each test. Glass fiber filters*

(3'' diameter) were desiccated for at least 2 4 hours and

weighed to the nearest 0.1 milligram on an analytical

balance. One-hundred ml of distilled water was placed in

each of the first two impingers: the third impinger was

initially empty: and the impinger containing the silica gel

was placed next in series. The train was set up without the

probe as shown in Figure A-1. The sampling train was leak

checked at the sampling site by plugging the inlet to the

filter holder and pulling a 15 inch Hg vacuum. Leakage

rates of less than 0.02 cfm at a vacuum of 15 in. Hg were

recorded in all cases. The probe assembly was then attached,

and crushed ice placed around the impingers. More ice was

added during the run to keep the temperature of the gases

leaving the last impinger at approximately 70°F. - MSA 1106 BH

Page 132: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

Y u cz

+A, 0 W L n W

.r cc 0 w 2 m s u a

t- rn

u -2

Page 133: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

During sampling, stack gas and sampling train data were

recorded at each sampling point and when significant changes

in stack flow conditions occurred.

rates were set throughout the sampling period with the aid

of a nomograph.

Isokinetic sampling

SAMPLE RECOVERY PROCEDURE

The sampling train was moved carefully from the test

site to the cleanup area.

used in the sample recovery were taken for use as blanks.

Samples of the acetone and water

The sample fractions were recovered as follows:

Container No. 1 - The filter was removed from its holder and placed in a petri dish and sealed.

Container No. 2 - Loose particulate and acetone wash- ings from all sample-exposed surfaces prior to the filter were placed in a glass jar and sealed. Par- ticulate was removed from the probe with the aid of a brush and acetone rinsing.

Container No. 3 - The condensate from the first three Greenburg-Smith impingers was measured within -t 1 ml and placed into a glass jar. Water rinsings from the back half of the filter holder, all connectors, and the first three Greenburg-Smith impingers were placed in this container and the container sealed.

Container No. 4 - Acetone rinsings from the back half of the filter holder, support, all connectors, and the first three Greenburg-Smith impingers were placed in this container and sealed.

Container No. 5 - A minimum of 300 ml of acetone was taken for the blank analysis.

Container No. 6 - A minimum of 300 ml of..distilled water was taken for'a blank.

The silica gel from the fourth impinger was weighed and

recorded. The used silica gel was discarded.

Page 134: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I!

I I

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

The following procedures were used and follow the

methods described in the Federal Register of August 17,

1971. 1

Container No. 1 - The filter and any loose particulate matter from this sample container were placed into a tared glass weighing dish, desiccated to a constant weight and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg.

Container No. 2 - The acetone washings were transferred to a tared beaker and evaporated to dryness at ambient temperature and pressure; desiccated to a constant weight; and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg.

Container No. 3 - Organic matter from the impinger solution was extracted with three 25 ml. portions each of ethyl ether and chloroform. The extracts were combined into a tared beaker, and evaporated until no solvent remained at about 70'F. The sample was then desiccated to a constant weight and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg. The remaining water was evaporated by boiling in a tared beaker, and the residue weighed.

Container No. 4 - The acetone washings from the back half of the filter holder, connectors and first three Greenburg-Smith impingers were transferred to a tared beaker; evaporated to dryness at ambient temperature and pressure; desiccated to a constant weight; and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg.

Container No. 5 - The acetone blank was transferred to a tared beaker, and evaporated to dryness at ambient temperature and pressure. The blank was then desic- cated to a constant weight and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg.

Container No. 6 - The water blank was evaporated by boilinq in a tared beaker, desiccated to a constant weight; and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg. corrections were made in proportion to the amount of

Blank

reagent used. ..

Federal ,Register, Vol. 36, No. 159, Part 11, August 17, 1971.

I

Page 135: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

*I I

.I !I i

Il Q I! I! P I!

G G E c c !

i .

4

I I I

I

I

DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN OXIDES IN STACK GAS:

PHENOLDISULFONIC ACID METHOD

INTRODUCTION

The following method was used to determine total oxides

of nitrogen. Samples were collected in evacuated flasks con-

taining a dilute sulfuric acid-hydrogen perox

tion, and the nitrogen oxides, except nitrous

spectrophotometrically at 410 nm.

REAGENTS

de absorbing solu-

oxides were measured

The following reagents were used in this sampling program:

(All chemicals were ACS analytical-reagent grade.)

Water - Distilled - deionized water. - Hydrogen Peroxide ( 3 % ) - 10 ml. of 30 percent H202 was

diluted to 100 ml in a 100 ml volumetric flask with water.

Absorbing Reagent - 2 . 8 ml of concentrated H2S04 was diluted to one liter with distilled water. After mixing well, 6 ml of 3 percent hydrogen peroxide were added. The solution is prepared fresh every two or three days.

in distilled water and diluted to one liter. Sodium Hydroxide (1 N) - 4 0 gm of NaOH were dissolved

Ammonium Hydroxide (concentrated) c

Sulfuric Acid (fuming) - (15-18% SO3)

Phenoldisulfonic Acid Solution - 25 grams of pure white phenol were dissolved in 150 ml of concentrated H2S04 on a steam bath. After the solution cooled, 75 ml fuming sulfuric acid were added. It was then heated to l0O'C for two hours. The reagent was stored in a dark stoppered reagent bottle.

Page 136: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

~

1 I # I i

Q # c c f I!!

e I I e 1 I c I I

I I

I

Potassium Nitrate Solution (standard) - 0.5495 grams of KN03 were dissolved in one liter of water in a volumetric flask. 100 ml of this solution was diluted to one liter in a volumetric flask. One ml of the final solution was equivalent to 0 . 0 2 5 mg NO2.

SAMPLING APPARATUS

Flasks - Two-liter, Pyrex, round-bottom flask were encased in a simple container with a sleeve and accompanying stopcock valve as shown in Figure A-2.

Vacuum System - The vacuum system consisted of a vacuum pump, capable of producing a vacuum of 3 inches Hg absolute pressure, connected to a 0-36" Hg u-tube manometer.

Thermometer - Dial thermometer, range 25 to 125'F. 5-inch stem.

Probe - Pyrex glass, heated, with a filter to remove par- ticulateatter .

Variable Transformer - Rated at 12 amps, 0 to 140 volts. Spectrophotometer - A Bausch & Lomb Spectronic .70, capable

of measurinq optical density at 410 nm in 0 . 5 inch absorbance cells was used-.

-

SAMPLING PROCEDURES

25 ml of absorbing solution were pipetted into a sample

flask. The flask valve stopper was inserted into the flask

with the valve in the "closed" position. The sampling train

was assembled as shown in Figure A-2 with all valves closed.

The probe was placed at the sampling point. The probe valve

and the pump-manometer valve were turned to their "open" positions

and the probe purged. The probe valve was then closed and the

flask valve opened to its "evacuate" position.- The flask was

evacuated to at least 3 in. Hg absolute pressure. The manometer

reading was taken by turning the pump-manometer valve to the

"manometer" position. The pump was turned off and the system

was checked for leaks by observing any drop in the mercury level.

Page 137: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

. .

al L i 7 tn

Page 138: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

The initial flask pressure, volume, temperature, and barometric

pressure were recorded on the data sheet. The probe valve was

slowly turned to the "sample" position until a slight drop in

the manometer mercury level was observed. The sample was allowed

to enter the flask for about 3 to 4 minutes. The probe valve

was then closed when there was approximately a one inch mercury

vacuum left in the flask. The final flask pressure and temperature

were then recorded. The flask valve was closed and the flask

contents were shaken for five minutes.

Sample Recovery

The samples were allowed to remain in the flasks for at

least 24 hours. The sample was then transferred to a 250 ml

beaker using a small amount of water.

Analysis

The sample was evaporated to dryness in an oven and then

cooled. Two ml of phenoldisulfonic acid solution were added

to the dried residue and triturated thoroughly with a glass rod.

One ml of water and 4 drops of concentrated sulfuric acid were

then added. The solution was heated on a steam bath for three

minutes with occasional stirring. After cooling, 20 ml of water

were added and mixed well by stirring. Concentrated ammonium

hydroxide was added dropwise with constant stirring until alkaline

to litmus paper. The solution was transferred to a 100 ml volu-

metric flask and the beaker washed three times with 4 to 5 ml

portions of water. The solution was diluted to the mark and

mixed thoroughly.

at 410 nm using the blank solution as a zero. A half inch absor-

The absorbance of each sample was measured

Page 139: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I t -

bance ce l l w a s used.

CALIBRATION PROCEDURES

Flask Volume - The f l a s k and f l a s k va lve were assembled

and f i l l e d w i t h water t o t h e s topcock. The volume o f water was

measured t o + - 1 m l . The f l a s k s were numbered and t h e volume

recorded on each .

Spectrophotometer - Al iquo t s of 0 .0 t o 1 6 . 0 m l of potassium

n i t r a t e s o l u t i o n ( s t anda rd ) was added t o a series of beake r s ,

and 25 m l of absorb ing s o l u t i o n added t o each. Sodium hydroxide

(1N) was added dropwise u n t i l a l k a l i n e t o l i t m u s paper (about

25 t o 35 d r o p s ) . These s o l u t i o n s were t r a n s f e r r e d t o 1 0 0 m l

volumetric f l a s k s and t h e absorbance r ead a t 4 1 0 nm. The ca l i -

b r a t i o n curve was checked p r io r t o each set of samples.

._

Page 140: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

i

DETERMINATION OF SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS IN STACK GASES This method was used to measure sulfur dioxide in stack

the Federal Register', with gases and follows Method 6 of modifications as noted below. SAMPLING APPARATUS

Nozzle - Stainless Steel leading edge.

316) .with sharp, tapered

Probe - Pyrex glass with a heating system capable of maintaining a minimum gas temperature of 225 F at the exit end during sampling.and prevent condensation form occurring.

Pitot Tube - Type S, attached to probe to monitor stack gas velocity.

Filter Holder - Pyrex glass Impingers - Four as shown in Figure A-3. The first

and third are of the Greenburg-Smith design with standard tip. The second and fourth were modified by replacing the standard tip with a 1/2 - inch ID glass tube extending to within one-half inch of the bottom of the impinger flask.

Metering System - Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, ther- mometers capable of measuring temperature to within 5OF, dry gas meter with 2% accuracy, and related equipment, to maintain an isokinetic sampling rate and to determine sample volume.

c

1. Federal Register, Vol. 3 6 , No. 247 - December 23, 1971.

I I

Page 141: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I .

I !.

I 1 e e I! e I! e c I!! t I! ? ?

a w

al-

3r a 0

O Z I -4

I

m

I + I-

a

v, Ln 4

w

._

Y

4 l- v,

3 V

E .r

m L c,

m E .r 7

n E m VI

m. 0 v, \

0 In N

m

dc a, L 3 m .r

LL

Page 142: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

Barometer - Bourden tube type to measure atmospheric pressure to + 0.1 inches Hg. SAMPLING REAGENTS

-

Filters - Glass fiber, MSA type 1106 BH of a suitable size to fit in the filterholder.

Silica Gel - Indicating type , 6-16 mesh. Water - Deionized, distilled. Isopropanol, 80% - Mix 800 ml. of isopropanol with 200

ml. of deionized, distilled water. Hydrogen Peroxide, 3% - Dilute 100 ml. of 30% hydrogen

peroxide to 1 liter with deionized, distilled water.

ANALYTICAL REAGENTS Water - Deionized, distilled. Isopropanol Thorin Indicator - 1 - (O-arsonophenylazo)-2-naphthol-3,

6-disulfonic acid, disodium salt. Dissolve 0.20 gram in 100 ml . distilled water.

Barium Chloride (0.0200N) - Dissolve 2.4431 grams of barium chloride [BaCl21 in 200 ml. distilled water and dilute to 1 liter with isopropanol. Standardize with sulfuric acid.

Sulfuric Acid Standard (0.02N)- Standardize to + - 0.0002 N against 0.01N NaOH which has previously been standardized against primary standard potassium acid phthalate.

SAMPLING PROCEDURE One sampling point of average velocity was chosen ._

which was more than 2 feet from the inner walls of the stack. The train was assembled as follows: 150 ml. of 80% isopropanol in the first impinger, 100 ml. of 3 %

hydrogen peroxide in both the second and third impingers,

Page 143: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I I 1 .

I l

a 0 0 c ! ! I 1 e I] e c t I I

I I

1 l

and about 200 grams of weighed silica gel in the fourth impinger. A portion of the reagents were retained for use as a blank. The train was assembled without the probe and was leak checked at the sampling site by plugging the inlet of the first impinger and pulling a 15-inch Hg vacuum. A leakage rate not in excess of 0.02 cfm at a vacuum of 15 inches Hg was recorded in all cases. attached and the probe heating system turned on. The probe heater setting was adjusted during sampling to prevent any visible condensation. Crushed ice was placed around the impingers and more ice was added during the run to keep the temperature of the gases leaving the last impinger to 70'F or less.

The probe was then

For each run, the data were recorded at startup, on completion of the test and at 15 minute intervals. Sampling was begun by positioning the probe at the sample point. at a rate of approximately 0.8 cfm for a 240 minute period.

The pump was then started and sampling proceeded

At the completion of the test, the probe was removed from the stack and the train was pruged for 20 minutes by drawing ambient air through the system.

SAMPLE RECOVERY The solutions from the second and third impingers

were transferred to a Wheaton bottle. These impingers and their connecting glassware were rinsed with deionized distilled water and other washings added to the same container. The isopropanol from the first impinger and filter were discard6d.

e

Page 144: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I I 1 I I

I c G I! i e e c c c r ! r r I I

I

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES The volume of the sample was recorded. A 10 ml

aliquot of sample was pippetted into a 100 ml flask. 40 ml of isopropanol and 2 to 4 drops of thorin indicator were added. The sample was then titrated with barium chloride to a pink end point. Each titration was repeated with a second aliquot of sample. The blanks were titrated in the same manner as the samples.

Erlenmeyer

._

Page 145: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I

‘ I

APPENDIX I

TEST LOG

Page 146: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

CHRON‘OLOGICAL LIST OF NOTES THROUGHOUT PROJECT (NOT COVERED BY DAILY PERSONNEL AND LOG SHEET)

Page 147: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

CHRONOLOGICAL L I S T OF NOTES THROUGHOUT PROJECT (NOT COVERED BY DAILY PERSONNEL AND LOG SHEET)

Page 148: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

CHRONOLOGICAL L I S T O F NOTES THROUGHOUT P R O J E C T (NOT COVERED BY DAILY PERSONNEL AND LOG S H E E T )

I I I I

I I j

I I

I ! !

Page 149: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

I I i .

1 1 .

c E c e e I 1

c

APPENDIX J

RELATED REPORTS

(Supplied by EPA)

.

I I

Page 150: Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 1 1.17 4 · PDF fileFailure of a field in the-electro- static precipitator caused the ... In both systems the inlet gas to the ...

... ... r

e L

?

RELATED REPORTS

I Because of the process and control equipment problems

that were encountered, two additional test series were

performed at the Woodville Lime and Chemical Company. The

first test series began on May 21, 1974, and is discussed in

EPA Report No. 74-LIM-3A. The last test series performed

started on August 5 , 1974, and is presented in EPA’s Report

No. 75-LSM-8.