BACE 2014 10-1-14... · Dr. Schaie’s “Seattle Study ... •A Policy approach can be effective &...
Transcript of BACE 2014 10-1-14... · Dr. Schaie’s “Seattle Study ... •A Policy approach can be effective &...
For the fitness for duty attendees: Please go to
www.pollev.com/vortex
Would You Fly With This Pilot? Assessing Fitness For Duty
Strategies for Safety
NBAA Safety Committee
Fitness for Duty Working Group
Quay Snyder, MD (Team Lead) – AMAS
Peter Agur – VanAllen Group
Paulo Alves, MD – MedAire
Fitness For Duty Working Group
• Quay Snyder (Lead)
• Gene Benson
• Dan Dominguez
• Debbi Laux
• Ed Thayres
• Jay White
• Leigh White
• Mark Larsen (NBAA)
• Peter Agur
• Paulo Alves
• Francois Lassale
• NBAA Safety Committee Leadership Team
Fitness For Duty
• NBAA Safety Focus Area – 2014 www.nbaa.org/ops/safety/top-safety-focus-areas/
• 3 Year Project
– Year 1 – Build Awareness / Needs Assessment
– Year 2 – Data Gathering / Refine Deliverables
– Year 3 – Field Industry Resources
Evaluation Barriers- Cockpit
Rationalization – “Just having a rough spell”
Sorry I missed all those radio
calls today.
“He’s OK – just having a rough spell.”
Evaluation Barriers - Management
• Legal / HR - Discrimination Suit
• Privacy concerns
• No Written Policy / Procedure
• Operational Demands
• Lack of Insurance / Disability Coverage
• Internal medical staff not trained for pilots
• Absence of Independent Expert evaluators
• Someone else’s responsibility
Bottom Line
Critical Threats & Risks to Safety
– Cockpit workload
– National Airspace System safety
– Puts Principals at risk
– Reputation of Aviation Department
Bottom Line
Critical Personal Health Issue
– Treatable conditions missed
– Physical / Psychological / Cognitive well being
Why Evaluate?
• SAFETY! SAFETY!! SAFETY!!!
• Staffing decisions
• Training Effectiveness / CRM
• Improved Health / Longevity
• Career Protection
• Financial Protection – Pilot – Insurance / Disability
– Company – Maximize Resources, Minimize Liability
Fatigue
NBAA Duty – Rest Guidelines
See Presentation by NBAA Fatigue Working
Group led by Leigh White
Wednesday 22 Oct 1330 Room S320H
Potential Causes - Medical
• Sleep Apnea / Sleep Disorders / Fatigue
• Medication Side Effects – NTSB-SS-14/01 (Includes OTC, Prescriptions, Illicit & Supplements)
• Acute Medical Condition (GI, ENT, Infection, etc.)
• Heart / Lung Disease
• Endocrine (diabetes, thyroid, adrenal)
• Hearing / Vision Deterioration
• Cancer
• Neurological disease
Potential Causes - Psychological
• Life Events (family, financial, legal, work)
• Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder – PTSD
• Depression
• Substance Abuse
• Anxiety Disorders
• Personality Traits
• Loss of Desire to Fly / Work
Potential Causes - Cognitive
• Mild Cognitive Impairment
• Alzheimer’s
• Substance dependence
• Surgery
• Brain injury / Bleed / Tumor
• Drug Use Trends in Aviation: Assessing the Risk of Pilot Impairment – NTSB-SS-14/01
Case 1
• 60 years old male
• LIMC-KCHS (Malpensa – Charleston) – Hawker 800
• Severe back pain and nausea
• Advil® (ibuprofen) 500 mg taken twice 45 minutes prior to contact
• Recommended diphenhydramine (Benadryl®) to relief nausea
Case 2
• 22 years old male co-pilot
• Shaking both hands, racing heart, difficulty breathing
• Van Nuys to Tapachula, Mexico
• Reports taking coffee and Rockstar® prior to the flight
Case 3
• 35 years old male
• G-650, EDDG-KBDL (return flight home)
• 5 hours to destination, 1 hour to EINN
• Vomiting, diarrhea initiated 3 days prior, now diarrhea with blood
• Tired and weak, severe stomach cramping
MedAire Experience 29 Months
• 89 cases Flight Deck-In Flight Medical Events were retrieved out of 59,143 total in-flight cases
• In 50 (60.9%) cases a medication was recommended or taken before contacting Ground Based Medical Support.
• NTSB – Study on Drug Use Trends in Assessing Risk of Pilot Incapacitation
Level of Impairment
• Loss of consciousness occurred in 10 cases (8 syncope and 2 seizures).
• In 29/82 (35.4%) cases treatment was deemed to interfere with cognitive function
Source: MedAire
Medical Incapacitation Categories
Loss of consciousness,
9, 31%
Gastro, 6, 21%
Neurological, 6, 21%
Cardiac, 5, 17%
Urologic, 3, 10%
Source: FAA
Summary
• Acute medical problems may cause various levels of impairment/incapacitation
• Gastrointestinal and neurologic events are responsible for more than 50% in-flight medical situations
• Prevention of acute cases requires applying I’M SAFE (Illness, Medication, Stress, Alcohol, Fatigue, Eating)
Aging Pilots’ Fitness for Duty
Are Aging Pilots a Threat?
The data says, “Yes.”
• US Census data
• Dr. Schaie’s “Seattle Study”
• NAMI Study
• FSF BASS attendees
Aging Pilots Fitness for Duty US Census Auto Accidents by Age
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
20 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 75+
Aging Pilots Fitness for Duty
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
None Low Moderate High
1%
17%
58%
24%
How significant are Aging Pilot risks?
Source: BASS 2014 Responses
Aging Pilots Fitness for Duty
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Yes No
6%
94%
Do FARs address Aging Pilot risks?
Source: BASS 2014 Responses
Aging Pilots Fitness for Duty
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
No Some Yes
64%
18% 18%
Do you have Aging Pilot Policies?
Source: BASS 2014 Responses
Aging Pilots Fitness for Duty
Four Cases of Aging Pilots
• 57 years old Failing Eyesight
• 57 years old and 300 pounds
• 57 years old and Alzheimer's
• 85 years old and kicking ***
Aging Pilots’ Fitness for Duty
Why self-reporting / FARs are inadequate:
• FAR 61.53 – Honor System
• Sense of Self – I fly, therefore I am.
• Career – If I cannot fly, what will I do?
• Economic – My IRA has not recovered.
• Social – She/he married me for better or for worse, but not for lunch.
Aging Pilots’ Fitness for Duty
A “Policy” Approach:
• Include HR & Legal – Fair & defensible.
• Set an Age Limit – 65? 70?
• Set a Retirement Date – 12/31/XX. Celebrate!
• Physical Assurance – Approved AMEs only.
• Cognitive Assurance – Testing / observing?
Aging Pilots Fitness for Duty
Summary
• Aging Pilots are a “Threat”
• FARs are inadequate for Business Aviation
• We must address ALL “Threats,” even if it means it creates a career risk for some pilots
• A Policy approach can be effective & elegant
Fitness For Duty Evaluations
Quay Snyder, MD, MSPH
President/ CEO
Aviation Medicine Advisory Service a division of
Virtual Flight Surgeons, Inc.
What Have We Seen?
Business Aviation Community
• 32 FFD evaluations in 3 years
• 3 pilots evaluated but not entered into FFD program
• 3 pilots retired immediately after entry
Well Defined Process Exists
• Approval by Company and Pilot Group
• FAA Buy-In and Support
• Medical Providers Aeromedical / Safety Focus
Medical Causes Diagnoses Cases Pending* Grounded Flying
Sleep Apnea & Restless Legs 5 3 0 2
Medication Side Effects 2 1 0 1
Eyes 2 2 0 0
Hearing Loss 2 0 0 2
Heart Disease 3 1 1 1
Lung Disease 2 2 0 0
Anemia 1 1 0 0
Neurological Disorder 1 0 1 0
Cancer 1 0 0 1
Diabetes* (3 others not related) 3 2 1 0
Heavy Metal Toxicity 1 0 0 1
Total 23 12 3 8
Psychological Causes
Diagnoses Cases Pending Grounded Flying
Family Issues / Counseling 4* 1 0 3*
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder 3* 0 0 3*
Depression requiring Meds 2 1 0 1
Personality Issues 3 2 1 0
Total 11 4 1 6
Cognitive Causes
Diagnoses Cases Pending Grounded Flying
Alzheimer’s Disease - Probable 4 1 3 0
Mild Cognitive Impairment 11 5 1 1 retired
4
Note : All pilots had potential medical causes
of MCI treated before evaluation / treatment
Solutions
• Ethical – Fair to All
• Optimize Health
• Reduce Liability
• Reduce Costs
• Integral to Flight Department
Bottom Line:
Reduces Risk, Reduces Threats &
Enhances Safety
Key Elements - Company
• Leadership –understanding & support
• Process – clearly defined with timeline
• Legal – negligible liability profile – 3rd party
• HR – regular communication, benefits adequate
• Aviation Director – pilot availability estimate
• SAFETY PROGRAM – Principals, Pilots, Public
Key Elements – Pilots
• Confidentiality / Dignity / Respect
• Benefit Protection – Disability, Loss of License
• Evaluation – Comprehensive for Health
• Aeromedical Context & Expertise
• FAA Medical Certification Advocacy
• Health Safety Career
Results
• Ethical Program – unlike status quo
• Policy Emphasis, Not Regulatory
• Return to Optimum Health
• Financial Protections for All
• Graceful Exit, if necessary
• Safety Priority – Balances many factors
Questions
• Public – Now
• Private – Cards on Table
• NBAA Floor Exhibit – Safety Committee Counter 1100 – 1300 22 October – Booth 297
• BASS, IOC, S&D, BACE 2015, others
• [email protected] – Dr. Snyder
• [email protected] – Pete Agur
• [email protected] – Dr. Alves