Baby Boomers, Wealth and Home Buying - California Real Estate Market Snapshot
-
Upload
nathan-bragg-remax-commercial-real-estate -
Category
Real Estate
-
view
15 -
download
1
Transcript of Baby Boomers, Wealth and Home Buying - California Real Estate Market Snapshot
![Page 1: Baby Boomers, Wealth and Home Buying - California Real Estate Market Snapshot](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/589e95f31a28ab9f728b53ff/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Baby Boomers, Wealth and Home-Buying
Demographics and wealth in key areas determineshome-buying, home-ownership and movements in thehousing market. Baby Boomers, long a driver of theU.S. housing market, remain a strong presence whowill determine the future and location of housingdemand up and down for the next 5-10 years.
Boomers have been, until now, the largest age cohortin the history of the United States. Today in California,there are 7.6 million people in both the 24-32 year, and50-70 year age groups. This emergence of millennialshas reduced boomer's proportion of the totalpopulation (from 37% in 1990 to 24% today). However,baby boomers now constitute the largest population of50-70 year old, as a proportion of all adults ever. InCalifornia, this group went from 15% of the populationin 1970, to 22% today, an all-time high.
Boomers are both the largest age group, and thegroup with the most amount of wealth. FederalReserve data shows that a typical boomer in theUnited States has $200,000 savings; compared to$10,000 for millennials, a 20x difference.
Further, much of this wealth is in housing: themedian equity gain since purchase is $150,000 forbaby boomers. This means that boomers bothhave the wealth and the equity to purchase now(more so than they will be), and for now they remain a primary force in home-buying and selling.
But huge changes in wealth will be determined bywhere in California the boomers are living andbuying, and where they choose to retire. Theproportion of boomers living in particular countieshave changed dramatically over time: cities withjobs have remained young (eg. Los Angeles, SanFrancisco, Alameda, San Diego, Fresno, andSacramento) and more affordable areas aroundthem have gotten younger: Riverside and SanBernardino are counties close to jobs, haveremained relatively affordable, and thus draw moreand more young people.
In contrast, more wealthy suburban counties havebegun to age very quickly from relatively youngstarting medians: Orange and Ventura, Mendocino,Marin, Solano, Sonoma, and Santa Clara, allstarted with relatively few older residents and haverapidly aged in the past 15 years. These areas areboth close to jobs, but are now both less affordableand older, reflecting costs, affordability and wealthgains for boomers. Additionally, there are severalcounties that have aged very quickly from relativelyold starting points in the past 15 years or so:Alpine, Modoc, Nevada, Sierra, Trinity, Siskiyou,Tuolumne, Lake, and Plumas counties.
The question for the future will be: who will replaceBoomers in these wealthy older areas? Willmillennials have enough money to purchasehomes in wealthy suburbs when Boomers areready to retire, sell, and move? Or will Boomersdecide to retire in place in California?
Brought to you by:
Nathan BraggSenior Vice president Commercial Realtor®
Commercial Division RE/MAX TIME, 10535 Foothill Blvd Ste 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CADirect: 909-210-3175Email: [email protected] License: 01340519