Babcock-Leighton Dynamo Theory and Solar Cycle #24Schatten.ppt Author: Phillip Traver Created Date:...
Transcript of Babcock-Leighton Dynamo Theory and Solar Cycle #24Schatten.ppt Author: Phillip Traver Created Date:...
Babcock-Leighton DynamoTheory and Solar Cycle #24
Kenneth SchattenAi-solutions
OUTLINE• SA PRED: FEEL+ TO PHYS. MODELS: DIKPATI +.
• PRECURSORS PREDS.: GEOMAGNETIC & SOLAR
• BABCOCK – LEIGHTON DYNAMO
• THE SUN’S POLAR FIELD
• PREDICTION FOR CYCLE #24
• ?s FOR MODELS PREDICTING LARGE CYCLE#24
• SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
SOLAR ACTIVITY
Geomagnetic Precursors, Kane
Solar Precursors : Brief Theory• General dynamo theory – DISK DYNAMO• Solar Babcock-Leighton model• Solar Dynamo Method - Magnetic fields at
the Sun’s Poles are the precursors forfuture active region fields.
• Near Solar Minimum, the Polar field of theSun extends past the Earth. This affectsgeomagnetic activity: hence geomagprecursors may serve to predict the Sun’sactivity.
General Dynamo Theory –DISKDYNAMO (MHD – FIELDS
AMPLIFY PRE-EXISTING FIELD)
Babcock-Leighton model Babcock-Leighton model
Traditional Solar Physics• Hale’s Laws• Spoerer Butterfly
Diagram• Joy’s Law
How the Sun ‘Broadcasts’ theState of its Internal Mag. Field
2 STEPS:
STEP 1: Polar field atsolar minimum actsas a precursor for thetoroidal field (activeregions).
How the Sun ‘Broadcasts’ theState of its Internal Mag. Field
Schatten, K.H., “Current Sheet MagneticModel for the Solar Corona," CosmicElectrodynamics, 11, 4, AsilomarConference on the Solar Wind, (1971).
STEP 2:Near solar min., the solar wind extends thepolar field into the interplanetary field. Whenit dips low enough to reach the ecliptic itcan affect geomag. activity. This allows it toserve as a precursor for next cycle’sactivity.
Shown are the computed field lines ontop of structure of the eclipse of Nov.12, 1966.
The Sun’s Polar Field
We often use a “SODA (Solar Dynamo Amplitude) Index, whichincorporates the Sun’s Toroidal and Poloidal Fields, but to reducecomplexity are showing the polar fields alone, as these have less“active region noise.”
Sun’s Polar Field, 10**-2 G
Mt Wilson Solar Observatory (MWO)
Wilcox Solar Obs. (WSO)
F10.7 Observations andPredictionsF10.7 Observations and Predicts
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Year
RadioFlux,F10.7
Obser vations Predic ted in Adv ance
#23 #24#22#21
Schatten et al. Predicted in advance
Observations
Solar Forecast for Cycle #24
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Time, Years
Rad
io F
lux, F
10.7
cm
Mean F10.7 Predicted +2 Sigma Uncertainty -2 Sigma Uncertainty
Where did the Sun’s Field go?‘Normal’ Polar
Coronal Holes atSolar Minimum
April, May, 2005 STAR SOHO/MDIApril, May, 2005 STAR SOHO/MDICoronal Hole MapCoronal Hole Map
October, 1996 Coronal Hole Drawing,October, 1996 Coronal Hole Drawing,Karen Harvey, using Karen Harvey, using KittKitt Peak He 10830 line Peak He 10830 line
Yohkoh Soft X-ray Image Aug.1996
2005
Idealized Model of“Typical” Solar MinimumCorona
Present Coronal Holes
?s FOR MODELS PREDICTINGLARGE CYCLE #24
• DIKPATI + MODEL: FEEL + TOWARDS PHYS.MODELS, BUT SOME ?s ARISE:1) DATAANALYSIS ? ,2) WHY SHOULD FLOW FOLLOWTHEIR PARTICULAR PATTERN?
• WHAT EXPLAINS THE OBSERVED DOWNTURNIN THE SUN’S POLAR FIELD FOR THE LASTSEVERAL YEARS?
• THE POLAR FIELD & ITS PROXIES (e.g. POLARFACULAE) CORRELATE WELL WITH THE NEXTCYCLE’S ACTIVITY. WHAT EXPLAINS THIS (IFNOT THE B-L MODEL)?
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
• BABCOCK-LEIGHTON DYNAMO THEORY• POLAR FIELD (OR PROXY) IS
PRECURSOR FOR NEXT CYCLE’SACTIVITY
• CURRENTLY POLAR FIELD IS LOW• THEREFORE, IF B-L THEORY & OUR
INTERPRETATION OF IT IS RIGHT, CYCLE #24 WILL BE LOW