B5_Hewlett-Packard Imaging Systems Division
-
Upload
saurabh-kanojia -
Category
Documents
-
view
11 -
download
2
description
Transcript of B5_Hewlett-Packard Imaging Systems Division
Hewlett-Packard Imaging Systems Division: Sonos 100 C/F
By : Group B5Ashish RanaNikhil Kumar
Nirmal RajSargam Malhotra
Vivek Busar
Hewlett-Packard Company is an American multinational hardware and software corporation.
Provides products, technologies, software, solutions and services to consumers, small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health and education sectors
Revenues : $14.5 Billion (Fiscal 1991)
The Medical Products Group (MPG) , a division of HP having revenues of $900 Million (Fiscal 1991) derived from a variety of product lines including patient monitoring systems , operating room systems, and clinical information systems
Key Person : Cynthia Danaher (Marketing Manager , Imaging Systems Business Unit(HP))
Company Background
Sonos 100
The Opportunit
y
The Potential
• Colour Flow is a cardiac imaging product which uses mechanical arrays to produce two-dimensional colour flow images
• Non-Hospital segment of cardiology
• Increased customer satisfaction
• Demand for ultrasound usage is expected to increase with aging population in USA
• New govt. Regulation may help in increasing in demand for medical imaging equipment
Product
Market in 1992
US, 41%
Europe, 33%
Japan, 12%
Others, 14%
Overall Market
US Europe Japan Others
Radiology; 328
Cardiology; 287
Others; 205
Product Market in US ($ mil-lions)
Radiology Cardiology Others
SegmentsH
igh
P
erf
orm
an
ce
Full feature SystemsColour Flow, 96/128 channel capabilities$150000 +47% market share and 64% revenue
Mid
-P
erf
orm
an
ce
Phased array or older technologies48/64 channels, lesser quality$90000-$15000016% market share and 17% revenue
Low
P
erf
orm
an
ce
Even lesser qualityOften lacked colour capabilities$55000-$9000037% market share and 20% revenue
How should the Sonos 100 CF be distributed: through ISY’s Direct sales force or through Manufacturers’ Reps(MR)?
Key Issues
Stagnating growth in USA ultrasound market (Mature market after initial growth in 80’s)
Increasing R&D cost in the wake of limited resources USA ultrasound market is going through transition phase,
which is moving from high-growth, technology driven market to a slower growth, market driven landscape
Management Decision Problem
Op
tions
Ch
oose D
irect S
ale
s
Team
Ch
oose M
an
ufa
ctu
rers
Rep
(MR
)
Positives:› Direct sales team would have long term orientation regarding
building relationship with customers› Direct sales team would be directly under the control of Sales
department› Direct sales team would be loyal to the company
Negatives:› Current Direct sales force doesn’t has relevant experience
and required skills to cater non-hospital segment of market› Increased cost due to investment in training of Direct sales
force
Positives:› MRs are usually former sales managers of major players in this market
having significant experience in this market, great negotiation skills and detailed knowledge of physician reimbursement procedures.
› Non-Hospital customers don’t care much about value added services to be offered by using Direct sales team
› Services of Direst team could be employed to target Hospital market segment
Negatives:› MRs work on commission basis, hence won’t spend much time in
developing the market or providing demonstrations and follow-up service› Loyalty to company or own interest› Lack of technical knowledge about the product› Turnover rate of MRs and additional costs of training and monitoring them
Choose direct sales team for the distribution of Sonos 100 CF because:› To emphasise on building long term
relationship with customers› Opportunity to develop skills of sales team
through training which will be an asset in evolving tougher market
› Greater control on the selling process › Loyalty issue
Suggestion
Thank You